research in the teaching and learning of physics part i: survey of cognitive science

89
Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Upload: ursula-craig

Post on 26-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics

Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Page 2: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Motivation

• Scientific approaches to science education– Research-based vs. seat-of-the-pants

• Is teaching an art?

Page 3: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Cognitive “Science”

• Caveat: Why the “science?”– Context of results

• What is it?• Why study it?

– Intellectual curiosity (how does the brain work? What is “genius?”)

– Practical applications (HCI, AI, education)– Implications for other fields (sociology, economics,

political science…)

Page 4: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

History• Plato, Aristotle (~400 B. C.)

– Empiricism vs. Nativism

• Scientific beginnings of psychology (1879)– Research by introspection– Free association experiments

• Behaviorism (1920)– Consciousness is neither definable nor useful

• Information-processing model (1960)– Research on human factors– Rise of computer science, artificial intelligence– Inadequacy of behaviorism in linguistics

Page 5: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Information processing

• Sternberg (1969)– Subject given a

string of one to six digits (e.g., 397)

– Measure time to determine if a single digit is in the string

Perceivestimulus 9 = 3? 9 = 9? 9 = 7? Make

decisionGenerateresponse

9 Yes

Page 6: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Features of IP model

• Discussion of what is going on in the brain, with no reference to physiological processes

• No reference of how symbols are encoded in brain

• Use of a computational metaphor

• Time measurement important

Page 7: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Domain of analysis

• Cognitive science <==> physiology

• Computer science <==> electrical engineering

• Emerging field: Cognitive neuroscience

Page 8: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Recent controversies

• Ecological approach (situated cognition)– Structure of the mind, environment, or both

• Connectionism– How can high-level functions be achieved by

connections of neural-like elements

Page 9: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Some areas of research

• Perception and attention– How do we recognize what we see and hear?

• Memory– How do we remember and forget things?– How does memory work?

• Problem solving– How do we solve problems we’ve never seen before?

• Development of expertise– How do we become skilled at cognitive tasks?

• Others: language, knowledge representation, child development, etc.

Page 10: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

What is memory?

• How is it organized?• How do we get stuff in and out?• How is stuff stored?

Page 11: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Sensory store

Attention

Short-term memory

Rehearsal

Long-termmemory

Organization of memory

• Rehearsal was necessary for getting ideas into long-term memory

• More rehearsal resulted in better memory

• Many experiments showed decrease in accuracy of recall with time

Page 12: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Memory

• Craik and Lockhart (1972)– Subjects given a 4-digit number– They then rehearsed a word for 2, 6, or 18 seconds– They were then asked what word they rehearsed– Subjects recalled 11%, 7%, and 13% of the words

• Rehearsal time is not the key, crucial part is processing of material

Page 13: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Working memory

• Contents can originate from sensory memory

• Contains information that one is conscious of at the moment

• Contents can be acted on and processed, or maintained by rehearsal

• 7 ± 2 elements

Page 14: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

5 0 7 2 3 6 1 2 4 8 2 9

Page 15: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science
Page 16: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

1 7 7 6 1 8 6 5 1 9 4 1

Page 17: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science
Page 18: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

dogrockchairbayropestinkdark

Page 19: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science
Page 20: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

universityaluminum

biographicalconstitutional

auditoriumorganizationuntargetable

Page 21: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science
Page 22: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Rehearsal and working memory• Has an articulatory loop• Holds 1.5–2 sec of infoOther evidence (Conrad 1964):• When subjects asked to recall

a string of letters (HBKLMW)– Mistakes consisted of

replacing a letter by one that sounds alike (T with G), as opposed to looks alike (Q with G)

– Harder to memorize letters that rhyme (BCTHVZ) than ones that don’t (HBKLMW).

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

1 2 3 4 5

Number of syllables

% correct

# words readable

(Baddeley 1986)

Page 23: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

37x 28296

+ 7401036

Page 24: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

374x 288

Page 25: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Working Memory

• Consists of a visuospatial sketchpad and a phonological loop, both controlled by a central executive.

• Physiological evidence--frontal cortex

Central executive

Phonologicalloop

Visuospatialsketchpad

Page 26: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Area 46• Test:

– Monkey shown food item that is hidden in 1 of 2 covered wells

– Monkey is prevented from looking at wells for 10 seconds

– Monkey allowed to retrieve food

• Human infants unable to perform similar task until 1 year (maturation of frontal cortex)– Increased blood flow to area 46 when retaining working-

memory information

• Monkeys with damage to frontal cortex unable to perform task– Neurons in area 46 fire only during delay period

Page 27: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Memory and meaning

• We normally remember the meaning of a linguistic message, rather than its exact wording.

• We tend to remember a meaningful interpretation of a picture.

• Less meaningful material can be remembered better by converting it to meaningful material.

What do we remember?

Page 28: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

• When you score your results, do nothing to correct your answers but mark carefully those answers which are wrong.

• When you score your results, do nothing to correct your answers but carefully mark those answers which are wrong.

• When you score your results, do nothing to your correct answers but mark carefully those answers which are wrong.

• When you score your results, do nothing to your correct answers but mark carefully those answers which are wrong.

To begin the test, please turn to page 2 of the answer booklet and judge which of the sentences printed there occurred in the instructions you just heard.

(Wanner 1968)

Page 29: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

(Wanner 1968)

Page 30: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Target picture(77% recog.)

Token change(60% reject)

Type change(94% reject)

(Mandler and Ritchey 1977)

Subjects studied 8 pictures for 10 sec each

Page 31: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

• 70% correctly reconstructed when given labels with which to study the picture

• 51% correctly reconstructed without labels

(Bower, Karlin, Dueck 1975)

Page 32: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Implications of memory for meaning

• Mnemonic techniques can be useful for learning things that don’t initially have much meaning– associating nonsense syllables– learning a foreign language (carciofi, Atkinson

and Raugh, 1975)– telephone numbers, names for faces, etc.

• Good memory for material results when it is processed more elaborately

Page 33: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Processing for memory

• Bobrow and Bower (1969)– People memorized simple subject-verb-object

sentences– Condition 1: Sentences provided by

experimenter– Condition 2: Sentences generated by people– Task: Given subject, supply object – Success rate was 29% and 58%

Page 34: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Processing and meaning

• Subjects’ show better memory for sentences printed upside down (Kolers 1979).

• Slamecka and Graf (1978):Generating vs. reading synonyms or rhymes for words

• Processing need not be focused on meaning of material.

Page 35: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Processing and intention

• Subjects shown 24 words spaced 3 seconds apart

• Half of the subjects told to check whether word contained an “e” or “g,” other half told to rate word for pleasantness.

• Half of the subjects told that the purpose of the test was to check for letters or to rate the words, other half told that purpose was to memorize the words

rate check e/gincidental 68%intentional

39%69% 43%

(Hyde and Jenkins 1973)

• Whether or not you intend to learn doesn’t matter! It’s the level of processing in which you engage.

Page 36: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Implications of processing for memory

• Study strategies (SQ3R, PQ4R)– Preview: Survey chapter, identify sections

– Questions: Make up questions about each section

– Read: Read section with questions in mind

– Reflect: Reflect on text, construct examples, relate to prior knowledge

– Recite: Recall info, answer questions for section

– Review: Review main points, answer questions for chapter

• Strategies designed to encourage deep processing

Page 37: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Some studies

• Frase (1975)– Control: Nothing special (50%)– Group 1: Make up study questions while

reading (70% / 52%)– Group 2: Answer study questions while reading

(67% / 49%)

• Rothkopf (1966)– Control: Nothing special (30%)– Group 1: Interspersed preview Q’s (72% / 29%)– Group 2: Interspersed review Q’s (72% / 42%)

Page 38: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Application

• Reciprocal teaching– Student/teacher play both roles inventing

questions

Page 39: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Practice effects

• Time to recognize sentences vs. number of days of practice (Pirolli and Anderson, 1985)

• Power law of learning y = A xB

Page 40: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Physiological basis

• When a neural pathway is stimulated with high frequency current, cells on that pathway become more sensitive to further stimulation.

• Measured percent increase in excitory postsynaptic potential (decrease in difference of electric potential between inside and outside of neuron) due to stimulating the hippocampus of rats

Barnes (1979)

Page 41: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Non-practice effects

• Success at word recognition (from a learned list) as a function of delay T

• Power law

y = Ax–B

Page 42: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Physiologically…

Barnes 1979

Page 43: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

But forgetting is not just a matter of time…

Interference effects

Page 44: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Pre-existing knowledge• Subjects learned 0-4 fantasy

facts about well-known people (e.g., Napoleon Bonaparte was from India)

• Subjects then judged three types of sentences, (a) fantasy facts, (b) actual facts, (c) false statements

• The more fantasy facts learned, the longer the delay in recalling actual facts (fan effect).

Lewis and Anderson (1976)

Page 45: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Redundancy

• Subjects learned:– a single fact (92% immediate recall, 62% recall after one week)

• Newton became emotionally unstable and insecure as a child

– a single fact + 2 irrelevant facts (80%, 45%) • Locke was unhappy as a student at Westminister• Locke felt fruits were unwholesome for children• Locke had a long history of back trouble

– a single fact + 2 related facts (94%, 73%)• Mozart made a long journey from Munich to Paris• Mozart wanted to leave Munich to avoid a romantic entanglement• Mozart was intrigued by musical developments in Paris.

• Additional knowledge can sometimes be helpful (but not always…)

Bradshaw and Anderson 1982

Page 46: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Retrieval and inferences

• “She was deaf, dumb, and blind.”– Carol Harris: 5%– Helen Keller: 50%

• Evidence for inference being made at test

Carol Harris’ Need for Professional Help

Carol Harris was a problem child from birth. She was wild, stubborn, and violent. By the time Carol turned eight, she was still unmanageable. Her parents were very concerned about her mental health. There was no good institution for her problem in her state. Her parents finally decided to take some action. They hired a private teacher for Carol.

Page 47: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

The heir to a large hamburger chain was in trouble. He had married a lovely young woman who had seemed to love him. Now he worried that she had been after his money after all. He sensed that she was not attracted to him. Perhaps he consumed too much beer and french fries. No, he couldn’t give up the fries. Not only were they delicious, he got them for free.

Retrieval and plausibility

Page 48: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Retrieval and plausibility• The heir married a lovely

young woman who seemed to love him.

• The heir got his french fries from his family’s hamburger chain.

• The heir was careful to eat only healthy food.

Reder 1982

• Judged for recognition or plausibility.• Recognition time increases with # facts. Plausibility time decreases

Page 49: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Elaboration and inferences

Nancy went to see the doctor. She arrived at the office and checked in with the receptionist. She went to see the nurse, who went through the usual procedures. Then Nancy stepped on the scale and the nurse recorded her weight. The doctor entered the room and examined the results. He smiled at Nancy and said, “Well, it seems my expectations have been confirmed.” When the examination was finished, Nancy left the office.

Nancy woke up feeling sick again and she wondered if she really were pregnant. How would she tell the professor she had been seeing? And the money was another problem.

Page 50: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Elaboration and inferences

• Studied propositions recalled:– 29.2 for theme condition– 20.3 for neutral condition

• Inferred propositions:– 15.2 for theme condition– 3.7 for neutral condition

• Many in the theme condition reported that the doctor told Nancy she was pregnant.

Page 51: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Implications for advertising

“Wouldn’t it be great,” asks the mother, “if you could make him coldproof? Well, you can’t. Nothing can do that.” [Boy sneezes.] “But there is something that you can do that may help. Have him gargle with Listerine Anti-septic. Listerine can’t promise to keep him coldfree, but it may help him fight off colds. During the cold-catching season, have him gargle twice a day with full-strength Listerine. Watch his diet, see he gets plenty of sleep, and there’s a good chance he’ll have fewer colds, milder colds this year.”

Replaced “Listerine” with “Gargoil.” After hearing this commercial, all 15 subjects checked “gargling with Gargoil Anti-septic helps prevent colds” as a true statement.

Page 52: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Schemas

• A representational structure in memory that includes characteristics of an object.

• House– Isa: building

– Parts: rooms

– Materials: wood, brick, stone

– Function: human dwelling

– Shape: rectangular, triangular

– Size: 100-10,000 square feet

Page 53: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science
Page 54: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Schemas and inference• Thirty subjects brought to room shown and told it was

experimenter’s office. Asked to wait there while experimenter checked on previous subject. Left for 35 seconds.

• Subject taken to nearby room, asked to write down everything they could recall about experimenter’s office.

• Descriptions influenced by “office schema”– nearly all recalled desk, chair, walls– only 8 recalled skull, bulletin board– 9 recalled books (there weren’t any)

Page 55: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Minerals

Metals

Rare Common Alloys

Stones

Precious Masonry

PlatinumSilverGold

AluminumCopperLeadIron

BronzeSteelBrass

SapphireEmeraldDiamondRuby

LimestoneGraniteMarbleSlate

Misc.: Organization and recall

Page 56: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Organization and recall

• Subjects studied 4 trees for one minute each– Words either organized or random– 4 trials

• Results:– Organized: 73.0, 106.1, 112 (max), 112– Random: 20.6, 38.9, 52.8, 70.1

Bower, Clark, Lesgold, and Winzenz 1969

Page 57: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Contextual effects• Divers learned a list of 40 unrelated words either

while sitting on shore or 20 feet under the water.• Divers asked to recall words in same environment

or different environment.

Godden and Baddeley 1975

Page 58: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

State-dependent learning

• Subjects learned a free recall list after smoking either a marijuana cigarette or an ordinary cigarette.

• Subjects tested 4 hours later after smoking one or the other

Study Tobacco Marijuana Average

Tobacco 25% 20% 23%

Marijuana 12% 23% 18%

Test

Page 59: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Summary

• The crucial factor determining how well new material is learned is how deeply it is processed by functions such as elaboration, question posing, comparison with prior knowledge, organizing hierarchically, etc.

• Prior knowledge has a great effect on what we think we learn and also on what we infer about the information we are presented with.

• Don’t smoke marijuana while studying.

Page 60: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Problem Solving

• What is problem solving?– When there is a goal you want to accomplish,

you don’t immediately know how to achieve the goal, and you devise and carry out a set of steps to meet the goal.

• IP model: Problem solving consists of moving through a problem space using operators

Page 61: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Modeling Problem Solving

• IP approach uses production systems• Production rules for multi-column subtraction problems

– If the goal is to solve a subtraction problem,Then make the subgoal to process the rightmost column

– If there is an answer in the current column,Then make the subgoal to process the column to the left

– If the goal is to process a column and there is no bottom digit,Then write the top digit as the answer

– If the goals is to process a column and the top digit is not smaller than the bottom digit,Then write the difference between the digits as the answer.

Page 62: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Early Research

• Cryptarithmetic puzzles

(Newell and Simon, 1972)

• Analyze protocols in terms of production rules

• Production rules explain 80 - 90% of protocols

CROSS+ROADSDANGER

Page 63: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Problem-solving strategies

• Difference reduction

• Means-end analysis

• By analogy

• Working backwards

Page 64: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Suppose you are a doctor faced with a patient who has a malignant tumor in his stomach. It is impossible to operate on the patient, but unless the tumor is destroyed, the patient will die. There is a kind of ray that can be used to destroy the tumor. If the rays reach the tumor, all at once at a sufficiently high intensity, the tumor will be destroyed. Unfortunately, at this intensity, the healthy tissue that the rays pas through on the way to the tumor will also be destroyed. At lower intensities the rays are harmless to healthy tissue, but they will not affect the tumor either. What type of procedure might be used to destroy the tumor with the rays, and at the same time avoid destroying the healthy tissue?

Page 65: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

A small country was ruled from a strong fortress by a dictator. The fortress was situated in the middle of the country, surrounded by farms and villages. Many roads led to the fortress through the countryside. A rebel general vowed to capture the fortress. The general knew that an attack by his entire army would capture the fortress. He gathered his army at the head of one of the roads, ready to launch a full-scale attack. However, the general then learned that the dictator had planted mines on each of the roads. The mines were set so that small bodies of men could pass over them safely, since the dictator needed to move his troops and workers to and from the fortress. However, any large force would detonate the mines. Not only would this blow up the road, but it would also destroy many neighboring villages. It therefore seemed impossible to capture the fortress. However, the general devised a simple plan. He divided his army into small groups and dispatched each group to the head of a different road. When all was ready he gave the signal and each group marched down a different road. Each group continued down its road to the fortress so that the entire army arrived together at the fortress at the same time. In this way, the general captured the fortress and overthrew the dictator.

Page 66: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Analogies

• Similar to learning from examples

• However, subjects often try to use analogies based on surface similarities

• Implications for solving physics problems

Page 67: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Representation

• Mutilated checkerboard problem

Page 68: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Representation

• Imagine 27 apples packed in a crate 3 x 3 x 3 apples. A worm is in the center apple and its ambition in life is to eat its way through all the apples in the crate, but it does not want to waste time by visiting any apple twice. The worm can only move from apple to apple by going directly up, down, or to the side. It cannot move diagonally. Is such a path possible? If not, can you prove it?

Page 69: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Representation

• You and an opponent take turns picking a number 1 through 9. No number can be picked twice. The winner is the first person to have a collection of numbers such that exactly three of them can be combined to add up to 15.

Page 70: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Set effectsProblem Jug A Jug B Jug C Desired

1 21 127 3 100

2 14 163 25 99

3 18 43 10 5

4 9 42 6 21

5 20 59 4 31

6 23 49 3 20

7 15 39 3 18

8 28 76 3 25

9 18 48 4 22

10 14 36 8 6

Page 71: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Insight problems

• Control group (given 30 minutes): 55%• Experiment 1 (half hour break in which they

performed other activities): 64%• Experiment 2 (4 hour break): 85%• Interviews showed that subjects did not come back

to problem with finished solutions.

You are given four separate pieces of chain that are each three links in length. It costs $0.02 to open a link and $0.03 to close a link. All links are closed at the beginning of the problem. Your goal is to join all 12 links of chain into a single circle at a cost of no more than $0.18.

Page 72: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Development of expertise

• Like memory, expertise develops on a power law

• Experiment in training to read inverted text

Page 73: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science
Page 74: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Expertise

• What differentiates experts from novices in chess?

Page 75: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 76: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Recall of pieces

722Master

612Intermediate

56Novice

RandomMeaningful

Page 77: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Expert memories

• Untimed chessboard-reproduction task (move pieces in meaningful chunks)

• No loss in recall after 30-second delay (better long term memory)

• Estimated that masters have 50,000 chess patterns stored

• Timing information: Masters recall more and larger patterns

Page 78: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Transfer

• After 200 hours of practice, subject was able to remember a string of 81 digits, repeated 1 per second.– Transfer to recall of letters = zero

• Brazilian children’s math skills– Situated context–– 98% accuracy– Lab context–– 37% accuracy– Word problems–– 74% accuracy

Page 79: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Expert problem-solving

• Development of useful strategies suited to a given domain– Physics and geometry: Working forward vs.

means-end analysis• Efficient use of working memory–no need to keep

track of goals and subgoals

– Computer programming: Breadth-first vs. depth-first

• Subgoals of a problem may interact

• Use of more abstract representations well-suited to problem-solving operations

Page 80: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Summary

• Problem-solving is typically analyzed from an information-processing point of view involving a problem space, operators, and production rules

• Generating an effective representation of a problem is a key step in its solution

• Transfer of skill is hard!

Page 81: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Implications for instruction

• LISP tutor– Guides students closely on relatively simple

programming problems– Monitors student performance on 500 production

rules– Research showing students learn faster using tutor

than ordinary university classroom instruction.– Same principle now used in algebra, geometry

tutors

Page 82: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science
Page 83: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Perception and attention

• What is attention?“Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession

by the mind, in a clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought. Focalization, concentration of consciousness are of its essence. It implies withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others.” William James (1890)

• Automatic processes

Page 84: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

red orange blue orange

purple black green black

blue purple green red

green blue orange purple

Page 85: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

red orange blue orange

purple black green black

blue purple green red

green blue orange purple

Page 86: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Stroop effect• Congruent: Shape has same ink

color as its associated color

• Control: White shapes or unassociated shapes

• Conflict: Shape has different ink color than its associated color 450

500

550

600

650

700

750

Congruent Control Conflict

Color namingShape naming

Condition

450

500

550

600

650

Congruent Control Conflict

Color namingShape naming

ConditionMcLeod and Dunbar (1988)

Interference depends on use of common resources (hard to disprove)

Page 87: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

RepresentationA label machine cuts labels and prints a letter on one side (either an A or a B) and a number on the other (either a 2 or a 3). It has no other characters and never prints anything but these and on the proper side. However, on every label that has an “A” it is supposed to print a “2” on the other side. Sometimes it slips, however, and makes a mistake on this.

If you are a checker checking labels as they come past you on the assembly line out of the machine, which of the following labels flowing past you would you have to turn over to check that they are done correctly?

A 3 B 2

Page 88: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

Representation

In a crackdown against drunken drivers, state police are revoking liquor licenses left and right if they find out that persons under the age of 21 are being served alcohol. You are a bouncer in a bar and it is your job to enforce the law. When a person orders a drink, the wait-staff writes the drink on one side of a napkin and the person’s age on the other.

Below are 4 napkins for the people at one table. Which napkins must you turn over to check if a person is breaking the law?

beer coke 25 16

Page 89: Research in the Teaching and Learning of Physics Part I: Survey of Cognitive Science

276951438