request background and project description · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848...

23
Applicant: Art City Investments, LLC. Location: 600 S Slant Prepared by: Sean Conroy, Community Development Director Public Hearing: Y Zone: R-2 Attachments: 1. Standard Findings. 2. Application Information. 3. General Plan. 4. Previous approvals. 5. DRC Comments. 6. PC Minutes. December 6, 2017 REQUEST Consideration of an Ordinance amending the R-2 zoning text to allow for lot sizes less than 10,000 square feet, and preliminary plat approval for the Sky Ridge Estates subdivision consisting of 20 lots located at approximately 600 South Slant Road. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is a 6.38-acre triangular shaped parcel located at approximately 600 South Slant Road. The property was annexed into the City in 2016 and is zoned R-2 with a general plan designation of High Density Residential (HDR). The property is bordered to the north by the South Hollow subdivision consisting of primarily ½ acre lots, to the south by the Mapleton Grove subdivision consisting of primarily ¼ acre lots and the Harvest Park subdivision to the east consisting primarily of 5,000 to 6,000 square foot lots. In 2008 a previous property owner had submitted an application to annex the subject property into Mapleton City. On April 1, 2009 the City Council approved the annexation of the property with a development agreement and concept plan that included 84 condominium units (see attachment “4”). However, the previous applicant never finalized the annexation and the approvals expired. On March 2, 2016 the previous property owner discussed the possibility of reestablishing the 2009 project approvals with the City Council. The Council indicated that it would not be supportive of such a dense project, but would be open to smaller lots and possibly townhomes on this site. The current property owner is now proposing the following: An amendment to the R-2 zoning text to allow for lot sizes as small as 8,000 square feet (developments would still need an average of 10,000 square feet per lot); A 20-lot subdivision with lot sizes ranging from 8,000 square feet to approximately 19,000 square feet; Two access points off of Slant Road and street improvements along Slant Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this project on October 26, 2017.

Upload: dinhhanh

Post on 07-Feb-2019

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Applicant: Art City

Investments, LLC.

Location: 600 S Slant

Prepared by: Sean Conroy,

Community Development

Director

Public Hearing: Y

Zone: R-2

Attachments:

1. Standard Findings.

2. Application

Information.

3. General Plan.

4. Previous approvals.

5. DRC Comments.

6. PC Minutes.

December 6, 2017

REQUEST

Consideration of an Ordinance amending the R-2 zoning text to allow for

lot sizes less than 10,000 square feet, and preliminary plat approval for the

Sky Ridge Estates subdivision consisting of 20 lots located at

approximately 600 South Slant Road.

BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The subject property is a 6.38-acre triangular shaped parcel located at

approximately 600 South Slant Road. The property was annexed into the

City in 2016 and is zoned R-2 with a general plan designation of High

Density Residential (HDR). The property is bordered to the north by the

South Hollow subdivision consisting of primarily ½ acre lots, to the south

by the Mapleton Grove subdivision consisting of primarily ¼ acre lots and

the Harvest Park subdivision to the east consisting primarily of 5,000 to

6,000 square foot lots.

In 2008 a previous property owner had submitted an application to annex

the subject property into Mapleton City. On April 1, 2009 the City Council

approved the annexation of the property with a development agreement and

concept plan that included 84 condominium units (see attachment “4”).

However, the previous applicant never finalized the annexation and the

approvals expired.

On March 2, 2016 the previous property owner discussed the possibility of

reestablishing the 2009 project approvals with the City Council. The

Council indicated that it would not be supportive of such a dense project,

but would be open to smaller lots and possibly townhomes on this site.

The current property owner is now proposing the following:

• An amendment to the R-2 zoning text to allow for lot sizes as small

as 8,000 square feet (developments would still need an average of

10,000 square feet per lot);

• A 20-lot subdivision with lot sizes ranging from 8,000 square feet to

approximately 19,000 square feet;

• Two access points off of Slant Road and street improvements along

Slant Road.

The Planning Commission recommended approval of this project on

October 26, 2017.

Page 2: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

City Council Staff Report

December 6, 2017

Page | 2

EVALUATION

Zoning: The property is zone R-2. Mapleton City Code (MCC) Chapter 18.84.020 establishes the

following objective of the R-2 zone:

“The objective in establishing the R-2 residential zone is to provide a residential environment

within the city which is characterized by a more compact and somewhat denser residential

development and somewhat higher volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic than is

characteristic of one-family zones.”

The R-2 zoning currently requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet (1/4 acre) per lot. The

applicant is proposing to amend the R-2 zone to allow for lot sizes as small at 8,000 square feet

provided the average lot size of the development remains at 10,000 square feet. The proposed

amendment would not allow for an increase in density, just greater flexibility on lot sizes. The

proposed amendments would also only apply to project sites of five acres or more located west of

Highway 89. See attachment “3” for the proposed zoning text.

Staff is supportive of the proposed zoning text as it would allow for more flexibility and variety in lot

sizes within developments. By limiting the text amendments to projects west of Highway 89, it also

avoids having lot sizes smaller than 10,000 square feet in areas east of Highway 89 that are typically

surrounded by larger lots.

Subdivision Review Criteria: MCC Chapter 17.04.050.B outlines the review standards that shall be

used by the City in making its determination. These standards are shown in attachment “1”. The

proposed project complies with these standards. However, if the requested subdivision amendments

are not approved, the subdivision plat as currently proposed could not be approved until the lot sizes

were amended to ensure each lot was at least 10,000 square feet in size.

Irrigation Ditch: There is an existing irrigation ditch that runs along the frontage of this property

that is being piped as part of the project. Due to the required flow line of the ditch, the road entrances

will have a hump to them. While this is not ideal, the roadway can still function. However, if the

ditch was completely piped north of this property (approximately 500 additional feet), the pipe could

be lowered to eliminate the hump in the road. The applicant is willing to participate in the cost of this

offsite improvement, but the City would also need to participate approximately $20,000. Staff will

have more information to present to the Council the night of the meeting.

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the ordinance with the attached special condition.

SPECIAL CONDITION

The applicant shall comply with all outstanding DRC comments prior to plat recording.

Page 3: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

ORDINANCE NO. 2017-

CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE R-2 ZONING TEXT TO ALLOW FOR LOT SIZES LESS THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE SKY RIDGE ESTATES SUBDIVISION CONSISTING OF 20 LOTS

LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 600 SOUTH SLANT ROAD.

WHEREAS, the objective in establishing the R-2 residential zone is to provide a residential environment within the city which is characterized by a more compact and somewhat denser residential development and somewhat higher volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic than is characteristic of one-family zones; and

WHEREAS, the proposed text amendments are consistent with this objective; and WHEREAS, title 17 of the Mapleton City Code (MCC) outlines the process and

requirements for subdivision approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and approved the preliminary plat

for this subdivision and the proposed text amendments; and WHEREAS, the proposed project complies with title 17 of the MCC as outlined in the findings for decision attached to the City Council Staff Report.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mapleton, Utah, to

amend Mapleton City Code Title 18.84 as described in Exhibit “A” and the preliminary plat for the Sky Ridge Estates subdivision with the findings and conditions contained in the City Council Staff Report.

PASSED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLETON, UTAH, This 6th Day of December, 2017.

________________________________ Brian Wall Mayor

ATTEST: ___________________________ Camille Brown City Recorder Publication Date: Effective Date:

Page 4: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Exhibit “A” R-2 Zoning Text Amendments

18.84.060: AVERAGE LOT SIZE PROVISIONS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS:

A. Purpose. The purposes for allowing the average lot size provisions for single-family detached dwellings include the following:

1) To allow for a variety of lot sizes within a development;

2) To allow for the protection of open space; and/or

3) To allow for flexibility in addressing unique site configurations and constraints.

B. Location. The provisions contained in this section shall only apply to property zoned R-2 located west of Highway 89.

C. Overall Size Requirement: The minimum overall size requirement for any development utilizing these provisions within the R-2 zone is no less than five (5) acres.

D. Density: The average lot size provisions contained in this section do not allow higher density than otherwise would be allowed in the R-2 zone.

E. Lot Size Requirement: The minimum lot size requirement for any development utilizing the average lot size provisions shall be no less than eight thousand (8,000) square feet. The average lot size for all lots within a development shall be a minimum of ten thousand (10,000) square feet.

F. Lot Width: Each lot shall have an average width of at least seventy (70) feet.

G. All other standards of the R-2 zone shall apply.

Page 5: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Attachment “1” Findings for Decision No. Findings

1. The plans, documents and other submission materials (including technical reports where required) are sufficiently detailed for proper consideration.

2. The submitted plans, documents and submission materials conform to applicable city standards.

3. The proposed development conforms to city zoning ordinances and subdivision design standards.

4. There are not natural or manmade conditions existing on the site or in the vicinity of the site defined in the preliminary plan that, without remediation, would render part or all of the property unsuitable for development.

5. The project provides for safe and convenient traffic circulation and road access to adjacent properties under all weather conditions.

6. The project does not impose an undue financial burden on the City. ✔

7. The location and arrangement of the lots, roads, easements and other elements of the subdivision contemplated by the project are consistent with the city's general street map and other applicable elements of the general plan.

8. The project plan recognizes and accommodates the existing natural conditions. ✔

9. The public facilities, including public utility systems serving the area are adequate to serve the proposed development.

10. The project conforms to the intent of the Subdivision Ordinance as described MCC Chapter 17.01.

Page 6: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations
sconroy
Polygonal Line
sconroy
Callout
Subject Propety
sconroy
Text Box
Attachment "2" Application Materials
Page 7: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

10065 S.F.

1

12220 S.F.

6

19043 S.F.

13

8993 S.F.

12

9392 S.F.

11

15867 S.F.

16

8150 S.F.

5

9045 S.F.

4

9596 S.F.

8

8996 S.F.

3

8145 S.F.

2

8726 S.F.

7

9172 S.F.

10

9329 S.F.

9

S

T

O

P

S

T

O

P

9354 S.F.

18

9459 S.F.

17

11606 S.F.

14

14662 S.F.

20

12848 S.F.

19

12719 S.F.

15

4002040

NO

RT

H

1" = 40'

1

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

SHEET

CO

VE

R

SCALE: 1" = 40'

LEGEND

VICINITY MAP

TABULATIONS

ENGINEER

PROJECT NAME

LEI CONSULTING ENGINEERS

3302 NORTH MAIN

SPANISH FORK, UTAH 84660

(801)798-0555

MAPLE RIDGE

EXISTING

WATER METER

WATER

WATER VALVE

FIRE HYDRANT

SEWER

SEWER MANHOLE

STORM DRAIN

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

STORM DRAIN CURB INLET

PI

PI VALVE

FENCE

PROPOSED

WATER

WATER VALVE

FIRE HYDRANT

SEWER

SEWER MANHOLE

STORM DRAIN

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

STORM DRAIN CURB INLET

PI

PI VALVE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SHEET 1

SHEET 2

SHEET 3

SHEET 4

SHEET 5

SHEET 6

SHEET 7

SHEET 8

SHEET 9

SHEET 10

SHEET 11

SHEET 12

x

EX-SS

E

X

-S

S

EX-SS

EX

-SS

SITE

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

5

1

U

N

I

O

N

P

A

C

I

F

I

C

R

A

I

L

R

O

A

D

1600 S

400 N

MAPLE STREET

800 S

S

L

A

N

T

R

D

HIG

HW

AY

8

9

NO

RT

H

DEVELOPER/OWNER

KW WESTFIELD KELLER WILLIAMS

REAL ESTATE

560 WEST 800 N STE 204

OREM, UT 84057

COVER

FINAL PLAT

UTILITY PLAN

GRADING PLAN

SLANT ROAD P&P

2340 W P&P

560 S P&P

IRRIGATION DETAILS

DETAILS 1

DETAILS 2

IRRIGATION DIVERSION DITCH

EROSION CONTROL PLAN

EROSION CONTROL DETAILS

TOTAL AREA:

# OF UNITS:

SLANT ROAD AREA:

INTERNAL ROAD AREA:

LOT AREA:

DENSITY:

6.51 ACRES

20 BUILDING LOTS

0.64 ACRES

0.88 ACRES

4.99 ACRES

3.07 U/A

GENERAL NOTES

PLAT "A"

MAPLE RIDGE

1. CLEARING AND GRUBBING WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE.

2. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MAPLETON CITY/APWA STANDARDS.

3. ALL VERTICAL DATA IS BASED ON NGVD 29 DATUM.

4. CONCRETE COLLARS TO BE PLACED ON ALL MANHOLES & WATER VALVES.

5. ALL CULINARY WATER LINES TO BE D.I. CLASS 350 W/POLY WRAP WITH TRACE WIRE.

6. ALL PI LINES TO BE C900/C905 SDR-18 PVC WITH TRACE WIRE.

7. ALL SEWER LINES TO BE SDR35 PVC OR D.I. CLASS 250.

8. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS AS PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.

9. DRIVEWAY APPROACHES TO BE COORDINATED WITH DEVELOPER FOR LOTS WITH

STORM DRAIN INLETS TO ENSURE PROPER HOME ORIENTATION & ELIMINATE

DRIVEWAY CONFLICTS.

10. ALL EXISTING INTERIOR FENCES TO BE REMOVED.

11. STORM DRAIN RUNOFF TO BE COLLECTED USING A FILL & SPILL SUMP SYSTEM.

12. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY SIZES & ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO

CONSTRUCTION.

13. CENTERLINE IN PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS HAS BEEN OMITTED FOR CLARITY.

14. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOR PLACEMENT OF

LIGHTS & RELOCATION OF NECESSARY POWER POLES.

15. GRANULAR BORROW IS REQUIRED FOR ALL FILL TRENCHES AND ROADWAYS (A-1-a,

A-1-b, A-2-b, & A-3).

16. PROPOSED FENCE ALONG SLANT ROAD (LOTS 1, 13-16, & 20) SHALL BE CONSISTENT

FOR EACH LOT.

17. ALL CURB INLETS TO SUMPS SHALL BE 4x4 BOXES W/SNOUT PRETREATMENT OR

EQUIVALENT. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 9.

18. SHALLOW SEWER MAY REQUIRE SUMP PUMPS FOR ANY HOMES WITH BASEMENTS

(LOTS 8 - 11 & 15 - 17).

IRRIGATION NOTES

1. APPLICANT MUST NOTIFY FRANSON CIVIL ENGINEERS (FCE) AND EBCC AT LEAST 24

HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ON EBCC FACILITIES. CALL TODD ADAMS WITH FCE

AT 801-756-0309 AND J MERRILL HALLAM WITH EBCC AT 801-376-9790. FAILURE TO DO

SO MAY RESULT IN A $5,000 FINE.

2. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DONE TO EBCC STANDARDS.

3. EBCC CONTACT DURING CONSTRUCTION: TODD ADAMS, 801-756-0309.

4. ALL CONCRETE USED IN CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE

STRENGTH OF 4,000 PSI. THE CONCRETE MIX SHALL INCLUDE BETWEEN 5% AND 7%

AIR ENTRAINMENT.

5. APPLY SWELLSTOP, WATERSTOP RX, OR EBCC ENGINEER APPROVED EQUIVALENT

TO ALL CONCRETE COLD JOINTS TO PREVENT WATER SEEPAGE.

6. ALL BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% STANDARD

PROCTOR DENSITY.

7. “IRRIGATION” MARKING TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED 18 INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE TO

HELP PROTECT PIPE FORM FUTURE EXCAVATIONS.

8. KNOCK-OUT BOXES ARE NOT ALLOWED. ALL BOXES SHALL BE PRE-CAST WITH

CORED OPENINGS FOR THE PIPES OR SHALL BE CAST-IN-PLACE.

9. NO TREES ALLOWED WITHIN 10' IRRIGATION EASEMENT ALONG SLANT ROAD.

SHRUBS OR SMALL BUSHES AS APPROVED BY THE IRRIGATION COMPANY.

LEI PROJECT #:

DRAWN BY:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

SHEET

2017-0050

DSE

NKW

5 -

--

REVISIONS

4 -

--

3 -

--

2 -

--

1 -

--

09/12/2017

ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERS

3302 N. Ma in St reetSpanish Fork, UT 84660Phone: 801.798.0555F a x : 8 0 1 . 7 9 8 . 9 3 9 3o f f i c e @ l e i - e n g . c o mw w w . l e i - e n g . c o m

MA

PL

E R

ID

GE

MA

PL

ET

ON

, U

TA

H

- A Utah Corporation -

NOT FO

R

CONSTRUCTI

ON

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

SOUTH HOLLOWPLAT "A"

MAPLETON GROVEPLAT "A"

HARVEST PARKPLAT "L"

HARVEST PARKPLAT "C"

HARVEST PARKPLAT "L"

R

I

V

E

R

B

I

R

C

H

R

D

SIL

VE

R L

EA

F D

R

AU

TU

MN

DR

560 S

O

U

T

H

2340 W

E

S

T

S

L

A

N

T

R

O

A

D

PROPOSED

FENCE

AutoCAD SHX Text
D
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
D
AutoCAD SHX Text
SD
AutoCAD SHX Text
SS
AutoCAD SHX Text
EX-SS
AutoCAD SHX Text
EX-SD
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
PI
AutoCAD SHX Text
EX-PI
AutoCAD SHX Text
WM
AutoCAD SHX Text
EX-W
AutoCAD SHX Text
W
AutoCAD SHX Text
SPANISH FORK
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAPLETON
sconroy
Text Box
sconroy
Text Box
Page 8: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

S6°38'00"E

120.00

N6°38'00"W

118.00

N6°38'00"W

199.85

N6°38'00"W

133.98

S83°33'1

0"W

206.0

9

80.0

0

80.0

0

80.56

N

8°05'46"W

105.73

N

7°06'08"W

100.01

N

1

1

°1

3

'1

7

"W

1

1

5

.5

3

N6°41'22"W

120.00

S85°02'5

7"W

111.5

4

S

2

4

°

4

4

'4

7

"

E

1

0

7

.

5

6

S88°07'02"W 87.49

N

7

5

°

0

5

'5

6

"

E

1

0

5

.1

9

S83°22'0

0"W

109.8

5

N

7

5

°

0

4

'2

0

"

E

1

0

0

.2

1

N

8°34'21"E

106.55

S83°22'0

0"W

160.0

0

10065 S.F.

1

12220 S.F.

6

19043 S.F.

13

8993 S.F.

12

9392 S.F.

11

15867 S.F.

16

8150 S.F.

5

9045 S.F.

4

9596 S.F.

8

8996 S.F.

3

8145 S.F.

2

8726 S.F.

7

9172 S.F.

10

9329 S.F.

9

44.5

6

L3

7

7

.7

6

79.3

1

4.31

21.64

79.89

76.04

37.11

48.53

80.04

98.00

60.0

0

35.5

2

3

3

.7

1

4

6

.5

6

44.5

6

N6°38'00"W

214.67

L

1

C

1

N6°38'00"W

266.58

S6°38'00"E

178.04

S

4

7

°

2

2

'

2

9

"

W

1

0

4

0

.

7

7

N55°06'47"W 15.01

N

2

0

°

1

1

'5

3

"

W

8

3

.

1

5

R=2023.54

D=9°24'42"

L=332.40

CH=N10°42'51"W 332.02

N1°30'47"W 190.43

N83°22'00"E 879.45

6

3

.

3

9

N83°22'0

0"E

135.5

2

C

2

N

7

6

°

3

4

'4

5

"E

8

0

.2

7

C

3

N83°22'0

0"E

44.5

6

C

4

L

2

45.7

6

226.3

3

N

4

7

°

2

0

'

2

0

"

E

2

1

5

.

3

6

N

4

7

°

2

0

'

2

0

"

E

5

0

3

.

1

5

N

5

0

°

1

4

'

2

3

"

E

9

7

.

9

5

S83°22'0

0"W

95.5

2

S83°22'0

0"W

83.6

2

S

7

6

°

3

4

'4

5

"W

8

0

.2

7

S

7

6

°

3

4

'4

5

"W

8

0

.2

7

S83°22'0

0"W

44.5

6

S83°22'0

0"W

44.5

6

C5

C

6

C

7

C8

C

9

C10

C

1

1

C

1

2

C13

C

1

4

C15

C

1

6

C17

C

18

C

1

9

C

20

C

2

1

C

2

2

C

2

3

C

2

4

C

2

5

C

2

6

C

2

7

C

2

8

C

2

9

C

3

0

C

3

1

C

3

2

C

3

3

C

3

4

C35

C

3

6

103.6

5

93.0

1

86.0

8

74.1

2

79.9

1

98.6

4

71.9

5

126.75

63.68

C

3

7

C

3

8

C

3

9

C

4

0

C

41

C42

1

9

.

7

6

6

.

7

5

6

.

3

6

9.05

160.0

0

46.0

9

4

1

.

9

3

2

0

2

.

9

1

9

8

.

9

2

1

5

9

.

3

9

119.29

9354 S.F.

18

9459 S.F.

17

11606 S.F.

14

14662 S.F.

20

12848 S.F.

19

12719 S.F.

15

N6°38'00"W

183.43

NAD 27 COORDINATE TABLE

POINT NORTHING

654464.19

652888.33

652698.02

652371.89

652293.87

652285.30

652989.88

EASTING

1970215.56

1970225.99

1970231.02

1970292.73

1970321.43

1970333.73

1971099.29

CURVE TABLE

CURVE

C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

C8

C9

C10

C11

C12

C13

C14

C15

C16

C17

C18

C19

C20

C21

C22

C23

C24

C25

C26

C27

C28

C29

C30

C31

C32

C33

C34

C35

C36

C37

C38

C39

C40

C41

C42

RADIUS

250.00

750.00

750.00

120.00

22.00

140.00

140.00

140.00

770.00

770.00

770.00

730.00

730.00

730.00

730.00

20.00

45.00

45.00

45.00

45.00

20.00

270.00

270.00

270.00

22.00

22.00

230.00

20.00

770.00

770.00

770.00

730.00

730.00

730.00

100.00

22.00

2023.54

2023.54

2023.54

2023.54

2023.54

2023.54

DELTA

26°01'40"

6°47'15"

6°47'15"

43°58'20"

71°59'22"

24°26'22"

24°26'22"

11°31'20"

6°36'42"

0°10'33"

6°36'42"

6°32'53"

0°10'59"

6°32'53"

0°03'23"

46°11'13"

64°18'00"

64°18'00"

57°04'06"

61°00'20"

46°11'13"

9°12'11"

9°12'11"

11°38'59"

77°43'33"

111°04'06"

14°57'34"

90°00'00"

3°18'41"

3°18'41"

3°28'34"

2°39'46"

2°39'46"

4°07'30"

14°01'08"

129°57'10"

1°37'10"

1°37'10"

2°16'01"

2°35'12"

2°21'20"

0°34'59"

LENGTH

113.57

88.85

88.85

92.09

27.64

59.72

59.72

28.15

88.86

2.36

88.86

83.43

2.33

83.43

0.72

16.12

50.50

50.50

44.82

47.91

16.12

43.37

43.37

54.90

29.84

42.65

60.05

31.42

44.50

44.50

46.72

33.93

33.93

52.55

24.47

49.90

57.19

57.19

80.07

91.35

83.19

20.60

CHORD

N19°38'50"W 112.59

N79°58'23"E 88.80

N79°58'23"E 88.80

S74°38'50"E 89.85

N83°20'02"E 25.86

N72°53'28"W 59.27

N72°53'28"W 59.27

S89°07'40"W 28.11

S79°53'06"W 88.81

S83°16'44"W 2.36

S79°53'06"W 88.81

S80°02'11"W 83.38

S76°40'15"W 2.33

S80°02'11"W 83.38

S83°20'19"W 0.72

S73°32'23"E 15.69

S82°35'47"E 47.89

S82°35'47"E 47.89

N36°43'10"E 42.99

N22°19'03"W 45.68

N29°43'36"W 15.69

N11°14'05"W 43.32

N11°14'05"W 43.32

N21°39'40"W 54.80

N11°22'37"E 27.61

S77°07'37"E 36.28

S14°06'47"E 59.88

S38°22'00"W 28.28

S81°42'40"W 44.50

S81°42'40"W 44.50

S78°19'02"W 46.71

S77°54'38"W 33.92

S77°54'38"W 33.92

S81°18'16"W 52.54

N89°37'26"W 24.41

N17°38'16"W 39.87

N14°36'37"W 57.19

N14°36'37"W 57.19

N12°40'01"W 80.06

N10°14'25"W 91.34

N7°46'09"W 83.18

N6°17'59"W 20.60

LINE TABLE

LINE

L1

L2

L3

DIRECTION

N32°39'40"W

S52°39'40"E

S76°34'45"W

LENGTH

17.25

19.79

2.50

SCALE: 1" = 40'

4002040

STATE OF UTAH

S.S.

COUNTY OF UTAH

ON THE DAY OF , A.D. 20 , PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME

THE SIGNER(S) OF THE FOREGOING DEDICATION WHO DULY ACKNOWLEDGE TO ME THAT THEY DID EXECUTE THE SAME.

APPROVED THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20 , BY THE

PLANNING COMMISSION

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, ALL OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF ALL OF THE PROPERTY

DESCRIBED IN THE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE HEREON AND SHOWN ON THIS MAP, HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SUBDIVIDED

INTO LOTS, BLOCKS, STREETS AND EASEMENTS AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE THE STREETS, EASEMENTS AND OTHER PUBLIC

AREAS AS INDICATED HEREON FOR PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC.

IN WITNESS HEREOF WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS THIS

DAY OF , A.D. 20

THE OF

COUNTY OF UTAH, APPROVES THIS SUBDIVISION AND HEREBY ACCEPTS THE DEDICATION OF ALL STREETS; EASEMENTS, AND

OTHER PARCELS OF LAND INTENDED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES FOR THE PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC

THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION

DATE SURVEYOR

(See Seal Below)

OWNERS DEDICATION

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

ACCEPTANCE BY LEGISLATIVE BODY

APPROVED BY MAYOR

APPROVED

ENGINEER

(See Seal Below)

CLERK-RECORDER

(See Seal Below)

ATTEST

BOARD OF HEALTH

APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS

CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT

PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL

DIRECTOR-SECRETARYCHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION

PLAT "A"

SUBDIVISION

MAPLETON

UTAH COUNTY, UTAH

SCALE: 1" = 40'

This form approved by Utah County and the municipalities therein.

MAPLE RIDGE

I, CHAD A. POULSEN, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, AND THAT I HOLD CERTIFICATE NO.

501182 IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 58, CHAPTER 22, OF UTAH STATE CODE. I FURTHER CERTIFY BY AUTHORITY OF THE

OWNER(S), THAT I HAVE COMPLETED A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION

17-23-17, OF SAID CODE, AND HAVE SUBDIVIDED SAID TRACT OF LAND INTO LOTS, BLOCKS, STREETS, AND EASEMENTS, AND THE

SAME HAS, OR WILL BE, CORRECTLY SURVEYED, STAKED, AND MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND

THAT THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

NO

RT

H

COUNTY-RECORDER SEALCITY-COUNTY ENGINEER SEALNOTARY PUBLIC SEALSURVEYOR'S SEAL

VICINITY MAP

ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERS

3302 N. Main S t re etSpanish Fork, UT 84660Phone: 801.798.0555F a x : 8 0 1 . 7 9 8 . 9 3 9 3of f i c e @ l e i - e n g . c o mw w w . l e i - e n g . c o m

- A Utah Corporat ion -

A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 3 EAST, SALT LAKE BASE AND

MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PLAT “A” SOUTH HOLLOW SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT

THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE UTAH COUNTY RECORDER, SAID POINT BEING LOCATED S0°03'01”E ALONG THE

QUARTER SECTION LINE 1576.35 FEET AND EAST 9.05 FEET FROM THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF

SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 3 EAST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN; THENCE N83°22'00”E ALONG THE SOUTH

BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PLAT AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF 879.45 FEET; THENCE S47°22'29”W 1040.77 FEET; THENCE

N55°06'47”W 15.01 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF PLAT "A" MAPLETON GROVE SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT

THEREOF; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: N20°11'53”W 83.15 FEET; THENCE

NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 2023.54 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS

BEARS: N74°34'48"E) 332.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9°24'42" (CHORD: N10°42'51"W 332.02 FEET); THENCE

N1°30'47”W 190.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINS: ±6.51 ACRES

NOTARY PUBLIC FULL NAME:

COMMISSION NUMBER:

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAH

40' SUVPS

EASEMENT

NORTH 1/4 CORNERSECTION 16, T8S, R3E, SLB&M(1955 UTAH COUNTY MONUMENT )

9

16

15

76

.3

5

9

16

NORTHEAST CORNERSECTION 16, T8S, R3E, SLB&M

(2003 UTAH COUNTY MONUMENT )

10

15

SECTION LINE-S89°40'26"W 2660.27

MAPLE RIDGE, PLAT "A"

LOCATED IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 16,

TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 3 EAST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN

BLUFFDALE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

SITE

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

5

1

U

N

I

O

N

P

A

C

I

F

I

C

R

A

I

L

R

O

A

D

1600 S

400 N

MAPLE STREET

800 S

S

L

A

N

T

R

D

HIG

HW

AY

8

9

NO

RT

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

P.U.E. & SETBACK DETAIL

STREET

ST

RE

ET

FRONT P.U.E. 10' FROM BACK OF WALK

10' P.U.E. 10' P.U.E.

10' P.U.E.

30' FRONT SETBACK/ 20' SETBACK FROM BACK OF

WALK FOR GARAGES THAT FACE THE STREET

10' SIDE

SETBACK

10' SIDE

SETBACK

20' REAR SETBACK

30' FRONT SETBACK/ 20' SETBACK

FROM BACK OF WALK FOR

GARAGES THAT FACE THE STREET

DOMINION ENERGY APPROVES THIS PLAT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIRMING THAT THE

PLAT CONTAINS PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS. DOMINION ENERGY MAY REQUIRE OTHER

EASEMENTS IN ORDER TO SERVE THIS DEVELOPMENT. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE

ACCEPTANCE, APPROVAL OR ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ANY TERMS CONTAINED IN THE PLAT,

INCLUDING THOSE SET FORTH IN THE OWNERS DEDICATION AND THE NOTES AND DOES NOT

CONSTITUTE A GUARANTEE OF PARTICULAR TERMS OF NATURAL GAS SERVICE. FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT DOMINION ENERGY'S RIGHT OF WAY DEPARTMENT AT

1-800-366-8532.

APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2017

DOMINION ENERGY COMPANY

BY-

TITLE-

DOMINION ENERGY ACCEPTANCE

APPROVED THIS DAY OF ,2017.

ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER CENTURY LINK

COMCAST

APPROVED THIS DAY OF ,

A.D. 2017, BY MAPLETON IRRIGATION COMPANY.

EAST BENCH CANAL COMPANY

1. #5 REBAR & CAP TO BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS.

2. NAIL AND WASHER TO BE SET IN TOP OF CURB @ PROJECTION OF SIDE LOT LINES.

3. TYPE II MONUMENT (ALUMINUM CAP & REBAR) TO BE SET

4. HOMES BEING CONSTRUCTED ARE TO HAVE FLOOR SLABS NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION.

5. VERTICAL DATUM BASED ON NGVD 29 PER COUNTY MONUMENT TIE SHEET.

6. NDCBU MAIL DELIVERY UNIT.

7. SUVPS (SOUTHERN UTAH VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS)

APPROVED THIS DAY OF ,2017.

APPROVED THIS DAY OF ,2017.

NOTES

EAST BENCH CANAL COMPANY NOTES

1. NO TREES OR SHRUBS IN IRRIGATION COMPANY EASEMENTS.

2. NO TELEPHONE BOXES OR POWER BOXES IN IRRIGATION COMPANY EASEMENTS.

3. FENCES DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE REPLACED AND RETURNED TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITION OR

BETTER.

4. IRRIGATION BOXES MAY NOT BE FENCED IN YARDS. DIRECT ACCESS (NOT THROUGH FENCES) MUST BE PROVIDED TO EAST BENCH

CANAL COMPANY FROM CITY STREETS.

23' P.U.E. &

PED. EASE.

23' P.U.E. &

PED. EASE.

SOUTH HOLLOWPLAT "A"

MAP

LETO

N G

ROVE

PLAT

"A"

HARVEST PARKPLAT "L"

(P

U

BLIC

- 4

0' W

ID

E)

560 S

O

U

T

H

(P

U

BLIC

- 40' W

ID

E)

2340 W

E

S

T

S

L

A

N

T

R

O

A

D

HARVEST PARKPLAT "C"

HARVEST PARKPLAT "L"

R

I

V

E

R

B

I

R

C

H

R

D

S

I

L

V

E

R

L

E

A

F

D

R

A

U

T

U

M

N

D

R

IRRIGATION EASE.

WIDTH VARIES

IRRIGATION EASE.

WIDTH VARIES

IRRIGATION EASE.

WIDTH VARIES

GRID FACTOR: 0.99969

BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED

ON THE COORDINATE SYSTEM, 1927 CENTRAL ZONE

NOTE: 30' SETBACK OFF OF SLANT ROAD ROW

SOUTH 1/4 CORNERSECTION 16, T8S, R3E, SLB&M(2003 UTAH COUNTY MONUMENT )

16

21

SE

CT

IO

N L

IN

E-B

AS

IS

O

F B

EA

RIN

G: S

0°0

3'0

1"E

5

31

0.3

2

POINT OF BEGINNING

NDCBU

EASEMENT

(RADIUS BEARS: N74°34'48"E)

AutoCAD SHX Text
SPANISH FORK
AutoCAD SHX Text
MAPLETON
sconroy
Text Box
sconroy
Text Box
Page 9: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

I

R

R

I

R

R

I

R

R

I

R

R

E

X

-

P

I

E

X

-

P

I

E

X

-

W

E

X

-

W

E

X

-

S

S

E

X

-

S

S

E

X

-

S

S

E

X

-

S

S

E

X

-

S

S

E

X

-

S

S

9

+

8

0

1

0

+

0

0

1

1

+

0

0

12

+

00

13

+

00

14

+

00

15

+

00

P

C

:

1

0

+

0

4

.

0

0

PT

: 11+

17.57

PI: 13+

84.15

10065 S.F.

1

W

W

W

P

I

P

I

P

I

P

I

PI

P

I

PI

PI

PI

PI

PI

P

I

PI

PI

P

I

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

9045 S.F.

4

9596 S.F.

8

8996 S.F.

3

8145 S.F.

2

8726 S.F.

7

SS

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

P

I

P

I

PI

S

S

W

S

S

S

S

W

SS

W

W

SS

W

SS

W

W

SS

SS

S

S

W

W

I

R

R

21.41' of 12" RCP @ 8.00%

7.71' of 12" RCP @ 0.54%

CURB INLET (72)

STA: 12+23.19 OFF: -18.75L

TBC: 4715.39

INV OUT: 4712.13 12" E

16.09' of 12" RCP @ 0.20%

CURB INLET (73)

STA: 12+23.19 OFF: 18.75R

TBC: 4715.39

INV OUT: 4712.13 12" W

S

T

O

P

CURB INLET (52)

STA: 10+46.81 OFF: -0.77L

TBC: 4712.90

INV OUT: 4710.80 12" SE

9354 S.F.

18

14662 S.F.

20

19

4695

4700

4710

4720

4730

4695

4700

4710

4720

4730

9+70 10+00

4713.13

4712.81

4716.29

11+00

4712.61

4716.36

4712.52

4715.98

12+00

4712.12

4715.61

4711.59

4715.23

13+00

4711.13

4714.86

4710.86

4714.48

14+00

4710.66

4714.11

14+50

4710.61

4713.73

S

=

8

.

0

0

%

L

=

1

4

.

1

6

S=-0.75%

L=499.25

GR

AD

E B

RE

AK

S

TA

=

10+

06.40

ELE

V =

4713.52

EX

. S

MH

(12)

ST

A: 9+

83.05 O

FF

: 42.91L

RIM

: 4713.12

IN

V IN

: 4703.60 8" N

48" S

MH

(13)

ST

A: 10+

31.52 O

FF

: 4.26L

RIM

: 4715.34

IN

V IN

: 4703.95 8" N

IN

V O

UT

: 4703.85 8" S

L=63.28 S=0.40% 8" SDR-35

L=87.22 S=0.40% 8" SDR-35

48" S

MH

(15)

ST

A: 11+

17.57 O

FF

: 5.00L

RIM

: 4716.13

IN

V IN

: 4704.40 8" N

IN

V O

UT

: 4704.30 8" S

L=291.18 S=0.40% 8" SDR-35

48" S

MH

(17)

ST

A: 13+

84.15 O

FF

: 25.11L

RIM

: 4713.95

IN

V O

UT

: 4705.56 8" S

HIGH PT STA: 10+68.56

HIGH PT ELEV: 4716.58

PVI STA:10+46.81

PVI ELEV:4716.76

K:6.00

LVC:52.50

BV

CS

: 10+

20.56

BV

CE

: 4714.66

EV

CS

: 10+

73.06

EV

CE

: 4716.56

60" S

DM

H S

UM

P #(75)

ST

A: 12+

23.19 O

FF

: 2.66R

RIM

: 4715.38

IN

V IN

: 4710.42 12" (W

)

IN

V IN

: 4712.10 12" (E

)

S=

1.5

9%

L=

22.3

4

2001020

NORTH

1" = 20'

6

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

23

40

W

ES

T/5

60

S

OU

TH

P

LA

N &

P

RO

FIL

E

SCALE: 1" = 20'

SHEET

LEI PROJECT #:

DRAWN BY:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

SHEET

2017-0050

DSE

NKW

5 -

--

REVISIONS

4 -

--

3 -

--

2 -

--

1 -

--

09/12/2017

ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERS

3302 N. Ma in St reetSpanish Fork, UT 84660Phone: 801.798.0555F a x : 8 0 1 . 7 9 8 . 9 3 9 3o f f i c e @ l e i - e n g . c o mw w w . l e i - e n g . c o m

MA

PL

E R

ID

GE

MA

PL

ET

ON

, U

TA

H

- A Utah Corporation -

NOT FO

R

CONSTRUCTI

ON

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

STORM DRAIN NOTE:

ALL CURB INLETS TO SUMPS SHALL BE 4x4 BOXES W/SNOUT

PRETREATMENT OR EQUIVALENT. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 9.

560 S

O

U

T

H

2340 W

E

S

T

2340 WEST PLAN VIEW

PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GRADE

8" CULINARY

8" PI (DRY)

8" SEWER

CENTER LINE OMITTED FOR CLARITY

36" IRRIGATION

SEWER

MANHOLE

#17

SUMP #75

INSTALL FIRE

HYDRANT

(TYP)

SEWER

MANHOLE

#15

SEWER

MANHOLE

#13

CONNECT TO EX

SEWER MANHOLE

#12

4" SEWER LATERAL (TYP)

1" WATER SERVICE (TYP)

6' CONCRETE MASONRY FENCE, SHALL

BE CONSISTENT FOR EACH LOT

6' CONCRETE

MASONRY FENCE

PI CROSSING

WATER CROSSING

FLOWABLE FILL AT ALL ROADWAY CROSSINGS.

CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE PIPE DOES NOT

FLOAT DURING PLACEMENT OF FLOWABLE FILL

(SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 10)

BEND CULINARY AND PI

UNDER IRRIGATION AS

NECESSARY

AutoCAD SHX Text
S
sconroy
Polygonal Line
sconroy
Polygonal Line
sconroy
Polygon
sconroy
Text Box
Road Hump
Page 10: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

E

X

-

P

I

E

X

-

P

I

E

X

-

P

I

E

X

-

W

E

X

-

W

E

X

-

W

E

X

-

W

E

X

-

W

E

X

-

S

D

E

X

-

S

D

E

X

-

S

D

E

X

-

S

D

E

X

-

S

D

E

X

-

S

D

E

X

-

S

D

14

+

00

15

+

00

1

6

+

0

0

1

7

+

0

0

18

+

00

1

9

+

0

0

1

9

+

4

0

.

4

4

PI: 1

3+

84.1

5

PC

: 15+

19.67

P

T

: 1

6

+

0

8

.5

2

P

C

: 1

6

+

8

8

.7

9

PT

: 17+

77.64

PC

: 18+

22.20

P

T

:

1

9

+

1

4

.

2

9

9392 S.F.

11

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

W

PI

PI

P

I

PI

PI

PI

P

I

P

I

P

I

P

I

P

I

P

I

PI

W

9596 S.F.

8

8726 S.F.

7

9172 S.F.

10

9329 S.F.

9

P

I

W

P

I

P

I

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

SS

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

SS

SS

P

I

P

I

P

I

PI

W

W

W

S

S

W

S

S

W

S

S

W

S

S

W

SS

W

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

W

W

N83°22'0

0"E

135.5

2

C

2

N

7

6

°

3

4

'4

5

"E

8

0

.2

7

C

3

N83°22'0

0"E

44.5

6

C

4

L

2

6

.

3

6

I

R

R

I

R

R

I

R

R

I

R

R

CURB INLET (64)

STA: 16+27.63 OFF: -0.75L

TBC: 4712.18

INV OUT: 4709.59 12" SE

8.25' of

12" RCP @ 0.50%

CURB INLET (70)

STA: 16+02.24 OFF: -18.76L

TBC: 4712.65

INV IN: 4709.41 12" S

CURB INLET (67)

STA: 16+02.22 OFF: 18.73R

TBC: 4712.66

INV OUT: 4709.41 12" N

16.70' of 12" RCP @ 0.20%

20.79' of 12" RCP @ -8.00%

S

T

O

P

17

11606 S.F.

14

SS

road 1 PROFILE

4695

4700

4710

4720

4730

4695

4700

4710

4720

4730

14+50

47

10

.6

1

47

13

.7

3

15+00

47

10

.5

6

47

13

.3

6

47

08

.6

2

47

12

.9

8

16+00

47

06

.4

5

47

12

.7

0

47

06

.4

0

47

12

.9

7

17+00

47

06

.5

1

47

13

.4

2

47

06

.7

4

47

13

.8

8

18+00

47

07

.4

5

47

14

.3

3

47

09

.0

9

47

14

.7

8

19+00

47

10

.8

9

47

13

.3

5

19+50

S

=

-

8

.

0

0

%

L

=

1

9

.

9

3

S=0.91%

L=225.30

GR

AD

E B

RE

AK

S

TA

=

1

9+

14

.0

4

EL

EV

=

4

71

2.2

3

S=

1.3

6%

L=

-26.2

2

48

" S

MH

(8

)

ST

A: 1

5+

08

.7

9 O

FF

: 1

.7

2L

RIM

: 4

71

3.2

6

IN

V O

UT

: 4

70

6.5

3 8

" E

L=241.13 S=0.40% 8" SDR-35

48

" S

MH

(6

)

ST

A: 1

7+

50

.0

0 O

FF

: 5

.0

0L

RIM

: 4

71

3.7

8

IN

V IN

: 4

70

5.5

6 8

" W

IN

V O

UT

: 4

70

5.4

6 8

" E

48

" S

MH

(4

)

ST

A: 1

8+

60

.2

7 O

FF

: 6

.9

8L

RIM

: 4

71

4.7

4

IN

V IN

: 4

70

5.0

1 8

" W

IN

V O

UT

: 4

70

4.9

1 8

" S

E

L=66.12 S=0.40% 8" RCP

48

" S

MH

(2

)

ST

A: 1

9+

24

.5

5 O

FF

: 1

4.5

7R

RIM

: 4

71

1.8

6

IN

V IN

: 4

70

4.6

5 8

" N

W

IN

V O

UT

: 4

70

4.5

6 8

" S

W

L=112.06 S=0.40% 8" RCP

LOW PT STA: 16+02.20

LOW PT ELEV: 4712.70

PVI STA:16+05.31

PVI ELEV:4712.57

K:39.82

LVC:66.00

BV

CS

: 1

5+

72

.3

1

BV

CE

: 4

71

2.8

1

EV

CS

: 1

6+

38

.3

1

EV

CE

: 4

71

2.8

6

HIGH PT STA: 18+66.72

HIGH PT ELEV: 4714.92

PVI STA:18+78.86

PVI ELEV:4715.05

K:3.42

LVC:30.50

BV

CS

: 1

8+

63

.6

1

BV

CE

: 4

71

4.9

1

EV

CS

: 1

8+

94

.1

1

EV

CE

: 4

71

3.8

3

60" S

DM

H S

UM

P #(68)

ST

A: 16+

02.24 O

FF

: 2.03R

RIM

: 4712.66

IN

V IN

: 4709.38 12" (S

)

IN

V IN

: 4707.75 12" (E

)

IN

V IN

: 4707.75 12" (W

)

IN

V O

UT

: 4707.75 12" (N

)

60" S

DM

H S

UM

P #(84)

ST

A: 15+

91.27 O

FF

: 2.00R

RIM

: 4712.68

IN

V O

UT

: 4707.73 12" (E

)

60" S

DM

H S

UM

P #(80)

ST

A: 16+

13.22 O

FF

: 2.00R

RIM

: 4712.68

IN

V IN

: 4707.72 12" (E

)

IN

V O

UT

: 4707.73 12" (W

)

60" S

DM

H S

UM

P #(82)

ST

A: 16+

24.22 O

FF

: 2.00R

RIM

: 4712.72

IN

V O

UT

: 4707.70 12" (W

)

L=11.00 S=-0.20% 12" RCP

L=11.00 S=-0.20% 12" RCP

L=11.00 S=-0.20% 12" RCP

2001020

NO

RT

H

1" = 20'

7

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

56

0 S

OU

TH

P

LA

N &

P

RO

FIL

E

SCALE: 1" = 20'

SHEET

LEI PROJECT #:

DRAWN BY:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

SHEET

2017-0050

DSE

NKW

5 -

--

REVISIONS

4 -

--

3 -

--

2 -

--

1 -

--

09/12/2017

ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERS

3302 N. Ma in St reetSpanish Fork, UT 84660Phone: 801.798.0555F a x : 8 0 1 . 7 9 8 . 9 3 9 3o f f i c e @ l e i - e n g . c o mw w w . l e i - e n g . c o m

MA

PL

E R

ID

GE

MA

PL

ET

ON

, U

TA

H

- A Utah Corporation -

NOT FO

R

CONSTRUCTI

ON

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

STORM DRAIN NOTE:

ALL CURB INLETS TO SUMPS SHALL BE 4x4 BOXES W/SNOUT

PRETREATMENT OR EQUIVALENT. SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 9.

560 SOUTH PLAN VIEW

PROPOSED GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GRADE

8" CULINARY

8" PI (DRY)

8" SEWER

CENTER LINE OMITTED FOR CLARITY

36" IRRIGATION

SUMP #68

SEWER MANHOLE #2

4" SEWER LATERAL (TYP)

1" WATER SERVICE (TYP)

6' CONCRETE MASONRY FENCE, SHALL

BE CONSISTENT FOR EACH LOT

6' CONCRETE

MASONRY FENCE

INSTALL FIRE

HYDRANT

(TYP)

SEWER MANHOLE #4

SEWER MANHOLE #6

SEWER MANHOLE #8

NDCBU

560 S

O

U

TH

2340 W

E

S

T

PI CROSSING

WATER CROSSING

FLOWABLE FILL AT ALL ROADWAY CROSSINGS.

CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE PIPE DOES NOT

FLOAT DURING PLACEMENT OF FLOWABLE FILL

(SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 10)

BEND CULINARY AND PI

UNDER IRRIGATION AS

NECESSARY

sconroy
Polygon
Page 11: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

NA

8

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

DE

TA

IL

S

SHEET

LEI PROJECT #:

DRAWN BY:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:

SHEET

2017-0050

DSE

NKW

5 -

--

REVISIONS

4 -

--

3 -

--

2 -

--

1 -

--

09/12/2017

ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERS

3302 N. Ma in St reetSpanish Fork, UT 84660Phone: 801.798.0555F a x : 8 0 1 . 7 9 8 . 9 3 9 3o f f i c e @ l e i - e n g . c o mw w w . l e i - e n g . c o m

MA

PL

E R

ID

GE

MA

PL

ET

ON

, U

TA

H

- A Utah Corporation -

NOT FO

R

CONSTRUCTI

ON

U:\0

_

LE

I P

RO

JE

CT

S\2

01

7\2

01

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

M

PL

TN

S

UB

\C

AD

\1

7-0

05

0 W

ES

TF

IE

LD

W

OR

KIN

G.D

WG

9/1

2/2

01

7 1

0:3

1 A

M

BOTTOM OF CONTRACTION

JOINT

8"

6"

24"

4"

12

"

6"

6

3

4

"

2"

8"

R=

3

4

"

UNTREATED BASE COURSE

24" CURB & GUTTER

S = 2.0%

40'

10'

STORM

DRAIN

CULINARY

WATER

2'

CURB

12" GRANULAR BORROW

ON NATIVE SOIL

18' ASPHALT8' PLANTER

CL

R/W

8" BASE COURSE

R/W

2'

CURB

S = 2.0%

18' ASPHALT

10' 5'

10'

PI

SEWER

3" ASPHALT W/ 1"

OVERLAY AT 1 YEAR

40' SECTION - ALL STREETS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE

5'

WALK

10' P.U.E8' PLANTER

5'

WALK

10' P.U.E

23' PEDESTRIAN & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) 23' PEDESTRIAN & PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.)

1 ROAD DETAILS

±68'

2'

CURB

26' ASPHALT

CL

R/W

8" BASE COURSE

R/W

EX. 2'

CURB

S = 1.5% MIN.

EXISTING 26' ASPHALT

10' IRRIGATION

EASEMENT

EX. 5'

WALK

SLANT ROAD

4" ASPHALT W/ 1"

OVERLAY AT 1 YEAR

5'

STORM DRAIN

12" GRANULAR BORROW

ON NATIVE SOIL

5'

WALK

IRRIGATION PIPE

SAWCUT EXISTING EDGE OF

ASPHALT TO PROVIDE CLEAN

EDGE

WIDTH VARIES

Page 12: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations
sconroy
Text Box
Attachment "3" General Plan Orange = High Density Purple = Low Density
sconroy
Polygonal Line
Page 13: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations
sconroy
Text Box
Atttachment "4" Previous 2009 Approval
Page 14: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations
Page 15: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations
Page 16: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

MAPLETON CITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES October 13, 2017 at 8:30am

125 West Community Center Way (400 North), Mapleton, Utah 84664

On September 14, 2017 plans were submitted for the Maple Ridge subdivision consisting of 20

lots. The items below include 1) requested changes to the submitted plans, 2) other items

required as part of the application and/or 3) informational items regarding city standards.

Community Development Division

Sean Conroy, Community Development Director, Phone: (801) 806-9101

Email: [email protected]

Please note the following and/or submit revised drawings and the following corrections:

• The project will require review by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Once

preliminary plat approval has been granted, all final plats must be approved by the DRC.

• Please select a new name for the subdivision as Maple Ridge has already been used in

Mapleton.

• Show all rights-of-way in cross hatching on the plat.

• The proposed wall along Slant Road shall be setback a minimum of 6” from the back of

sidewalk and shall not be located within the clear vision triangle as defined by the

following:

“At intersections of public streets, the triangle shall be defined by drawing a line

between the two (2) points that are a minimum of thirty feet (30') from the

intersection along the property lines.”

• Include the addressed on the plat as shown in the attached plan.

• Submit a preliminary title report or certificate of title insurance.

• Any rollback taxes must be paid prior to plat recording.

Engineering and Public Works Division

Steven Lord, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer, Phone (801) 489-6253

Email: [email protected]

Miscellaneous

• Show proposed mailbox location (contact the post office regarding mailbox installation

(see attached letter).

• Current Mapleton City and/or APWA standards will apply, please note as such.

• All roadway trenching must be repaired using APWA standard T-Patch, please include T-

Patch detail in plan set.

• As-Builts must be collected electronically using GPS or other Survey grade equipment

during construction and prior to backfill. All appurtenances including tees, bends,

crosses, hot taps etc. must be collected. Surface features such as manholes, valve lids,

water meters, sewer laterals etc must also be collected. As-Built data will be delivered to

the City in either GIS or AutoCAD format prior to passing final inspection. Please add

note to plan set.

• All utilities will be marked in the curb.

sconroy
Text Box
Attachment "5" DRC Comments
Page 17: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

• Any work with irrigation ditches/pipes will require Irrigation Company review and

approval.

Roadway

• Please adjust roadway alignments to be perpendicular to Slant Road.

• Please reduce curb return grades to less than 8%.

• Adjust grades to eliminate flat curb section 2340 W 13+32.24 – 13+46.68.

• Adjust Slant Road curb grades to remove hump over HDPE pipe in 2340 West.

• Adjust curb grades in Slant Road to minimize cross slopes over 2%.

• Vertical curves are required in roadways wherever there is an algebraic grade break

greater than 1% on road sections or 2% at intersections.

• Crest curves must have a K value greater or equal to 12 for a 25mph road.

• Label ADA ramps.

Pressurized Irrigation

• Utility sheet does not show PI main.

• Replace word “BEND” with “LOOP” on water/PI crossing of HDPE pipe and provide

LOOP detail.

• Install a 2” drain from the low point in the system to a storm drain inlet.

Storm Drain

• Move label for sumps #53 and #59.

Water

• Connections to existing water main will be hot taps, please note as such.

• Water Main may be C900 PVC with trace wire and warning tap.e

• A hydraulic water analysis must be performed for the development at the developer’s

expense. Contact Carl Cook at RB&G Engineering (801) 374-5771.

FYI, Prior to plat recording:

Revise drawings to address any outstanding issues raised in the DRC comments

and/or project conditions.

Submit Final Plat for each phase, and receive DRC approval of Final Plat.

Applicant may choose to either 1) establish a performance bond and durability

bond agreement prior to plat recording (amount to be determined by City

Engineer) or 2) to install any required improvements (i.e. utilities, roads, curb,

gutter, sidewalk, etc.) without a performance bond (durability bond still

required). If option 2 is selected, the plat will not be recorded until the City has

accepted the improvements.

Payment of impact fees of $90,560 ($4,528 per lot). An additional impact fee of

$6,968 per lot will be required at the time of building permit issuance.

Submittal of 17 acre feet of water shares/rights.

Payment of engineering inspection fees of $3,400 ($170 per lot).

Payment of street light fee $9,000 ($450 per lot).

Payment of slurry road fee ($.18 a sq. ft. of asphalt).

Page 18: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Submit a SWPPP and Land Disturbance application and fee ($500). Contact JD

Shepherd at Public Works (489-6253) to review this requirement.

Submit final mylar with all required signatures.

Submit a check made out to Utah County Recorder ($30 per page and $1 per lot).

Coordinate with the Postal Service regarding location of cluster mailbox (CBU).

The purchase and placement of the CBU is the responsibility of the developer (see

attached letter).

Page 19: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Planning Commission Minutes – October 26, 2017

MAPLETON CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES

October 26, 2017

PRESIDING AND CONDUCTING: Chairman Golden Murray

Commissioners in Attendance: Therin Garrett

Christy Nemelka

Staff in Attendance: Sean Conroy, Community Development Director

Brian Tucker, Planner

Minutes Taken by: April Houser, Executive Secretary

Chairman Murray called the meeting to order at 6:30pm. An invocation and the Pledge of

Allegiance was given.

Items are not necessarily heard in the order listed below.

Alternate Commissioner Christy Nemelka was seated as a voting member this evening.

Item 1. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – October 12, 2017.

Motion: Commissioner Nemelka moved to approve the October 12, 2017 Planning

Commission Meeting Minutes.

Second: Commissioner Garrett

Vote: Unanimous

Item 2. Consideration of a request to amend the R-2 Zoning Text to allow for lot sizes

less than 10,000 square feet and Preliminary Plat approval for the Maple

Ridge Subdivision consisting of 20 lots located at approximately 600 South

Slant Road.

Sean Conroy, Community Development Director, went over the Staff Report for those in

attendance. The subject property is just over 6 acres in size. It is just northwest of the Maple

Ridge Elementary School. In 2008 the City had an annexation application in front of them for this

property that included a 3 story condominium unit on it. The applicants never moved forward with

this request, and the approval time lapsed. The property was then annexed into the City in June

2016 with R-2 Zoning. The applicants are hoping to have some flexibility with the lot size due to

the land configuration, with an access road connecting to Slant Road. The proposed amendments

sconroy
Text Box
Attachment "6" PC Minutes
Page 20: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Planning Commission Minutes – October 26, 2017

would only apply to properties in the R-2 Zone on the west side of Highway 89. The amendment

would not allow for an increase in density, it just allows for lot size flexibility. If approved, the

project would meet zoning standards. Staff does not feel this would prohibit any other

developments on the west side of Highway 89 if the R-2 zone text was amended.

Chairman Murray opened the Public Hearing. Adam Loser, with D.R. Horton, feels lot

averaging is common, and lend their support to the applicant. Brad Morgan, applicant, echoes

what Adam stated. He feels the text amendment would benefit other projects. The diversity is

nice to have through developments. No additional comments were given and the Public Hearing

was closed.

Commissioner Nemelka asked if the applicant could amend the size requirement in the future,

allowing for smaller lot sizes. Sean stated that most of the properties undeveloped on the west

side of Highway 89 are larger in size, and would likely develop under a SDP or PRC zone. Staff

feels this proposal is better than previous ones that have been brought before the Commission and

Council on this parcel.

Motion: Commissioner Nemelka moved to recommend approval to the City Council of an

ordinance amending the R-2 Zoning Text to allow for lot sizes less than 10,000

square feet and Preliminary Plat approval for the Maple Ridge Subdivision

consisting of 20 lots located at approximately 600 South Slant Road, with the

condition that the applicant shall comply with all outstanding Development Review

Committee (DRC) comments prior to plat recording.

Second: Commissioner Garrett

Vote: Unanimous

Item 3. Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new

church building located at 825 East Hawks Rest Drive.

Brian Tucker, Planner, went over the Staff Report for those in attendance. This would be lot 22

in the Eagle Rock Subdivision. This 3.3-acre parcel was dedicated as a church site since the

development was recorded. The property is zoned RA-1-C, which would allow for this type of

use. The building would be approximately 18,308 square feet in size. The applicant would expand

the retention basin that is located across the street at the City Park, at the applicant’s expense.

They plan to beautify the retention area as well, when they expand it. Setback and parking

standards are met with the proposal this evening. The parking area being proposed would take up

about 52% of the site, with landscaping covering 28% of the property. A landscape plan was part

of the Staff Report this evening. Brian went over the landscaping requirements listed in the

ordinance. Amendments to the landscape requirements can be approved if the Planning

Commission grants it, with the understanding that the amendments are more beneficial, and the

reason for believing such. Brian went over the proposed conditions of approval being

recommended by Staff. He also went over the alternative actions that could take place if the

Page 21: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Planning Commission Minutes – October 26, 2017

Commission desired to do so. The request is for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval.

Chairman Murray asked about the larger trees along the perimeter, and the possibility that they

may overhang into adjacent properties.

Mark Greenwood, with ALM Associates, stated that he enjoys working with Mapleton. This is

somewhat of a difficult site. They spoke with their landscape architect about adding in some

Crimson King trees, which is a possibility. The difficulty with the landscape islands along the

ends and middle of parking stalls causes issues with snow removal and the convenient access for

Emergency vehicles. These reasons are why they are requesting the amendment to the current

proposed landscape parking areas. The applicant has proposed additional landscaping than what

is required, with the hopes that it will allow them to eliminate the island parking. Miles

Malcovich, Project Manager for the LDS Church, stated that he is not aware of why the previous

buildings did not have specific landscape wording as part of their approvals. The interior islands

become very problematic for snow removal. When snow is plowed in the parking lots that have

these islands, you essentially lose 2 parking stalls per island due to the lack of area to put the snow.

This creates a real hazard and problem for the members of the church visiting the meeting house.

They are willing to provide a landscaping plan that shows they can meet the 25% landscaping with

the long linear islands. Mr. Malcovich was very complimentary of staff. They have the best

interest of the property in mind. They are willing to work with neighboring property owners as

well, if there is a concern with the trees shading or dropping leaves on their property. The long

linear islands are proposed at 8’ in width, which allows for trees to grow and gain adequate access

to water.

Chairman Murray allowed for public comment. Joan Roth lives on Hawks Rest Drive. They

have some concerns with the street during and after construction. The street parking is something

they feel could be a problem. The construction workers have been a problem with being onsite

before the allowed 7am timeframe on other projects in the area, and hope this can be avoided while

building the church. They would like some extra speed limit signs installed, with additional police

coverage to ensure individuals are not speeding. On a project this large, there would be a pre-

construction meeting, which could include the police department to ensure these concerns are

being addressed. The City Engineer would address any need to additional speed limit signs, or

concerns with individuals driving recklessly along Hawks Rest Drive. There is existing curb and

gutter along this property now. Jesse McLean is in favor of the church. He had a concern with

no sidewalks in the area, as people may walk to church. He hopes measures could be taken to

ensure safety. The Commission could ask the City Engineer to evaluate the safety of allowing

street parking. The fence would be the 6’ chain link privacy fencing. They do require all

construction vehicles to park onsite, aside of the times when pavement, etc. could be under

construction. They will comply to the noise ordinance requirements, which is 7am to 10pm. The

applicant wants to be a good neighbor. There will be some grade mitigation, with retaining walls

where needed. The applicants prefer a little larger parking stall. The 25% landscape tree coverage

may be difficult, but they feel they could reach 20%, or 25%, of the parking stalls themselves.

Commissioner Garrett would like to see the concrete section of the retention area at the park

Page 22: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Planning Commission Minutes – October 26, 2017

fixed if possible.

Motion: Commissioner Garrett moved to approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a

new church building located at 825 East Hawks Rest Drive, with the below

conditions:

1. Violations of the terms of this use permit or other ordinances of the City

may constitute grounds for revocation of this permit and associated

business license by the Planning Commission.

2. If the proposed use is abandoned for a period of six months or more, the

use permit will become null and void.

3. Deciduous trees shall be planted within said parking area landscaping

in a manner such that, at maturity of said trees, near twenty five percent

(25%) of the paved surface area of the parking area will be shaded when

the sun is directly overhead. A landscaping plan shall be submitted that

shows the canopies of the required shade trees with an accurate

calculation of the shaded area when the sun is directly overhead.

4. Interior parking lot landscaping areas shall be dispersed throughout the

parking lot, with the allowance for linear landscaped areas, due to the

below listed reasons:

a. Benefits the site for snow removal and maintenance.

b. Will provide additional landscaping than required.

c. If islands were required it would reduce the available parking

stalls during the possible snowy months.

5. City Engineer address the safety of parking on both sides of the street

along Hawks Rest Drive.

Second: Commissioner Nemelka

Vote: Unanimous

Item 4. Consideration of a request to construct an accessory building prior to the

construction of the main residence on a lot in the Nemelka Lane subdivision

located at 1505 East 900 South.

Sean Conroy, Community Development Director, went over the Staff Report for those in

attendance. The applicant is proposing to build a single-family home on the site, and are hoping

to build an accessory building before the home construction takes place. The A2 Zone allows for

agricultural buildings to be built. If it is an accessory structure, what is it accessory to. Staff’s

typical concern is to avoid property owners from building accessory structures without living in

the development. The living parcel of the structure could not exceed 1,000 square feet in size.

Commissioner Garrett felt inclined to hold to the ordinance, but was amenable to conditions of

approval.

Motion: Commissioner Nemelka moved to deny the request to construct an accessory

Page 23: REQUEST BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION · 9459 s.f. 17. 11606 s.f. 14. 14662 s.f. 20. 12848 s.f. 19. 12719 s.f. 15. 40 20 0 40. north. 1" = 40' ... legend vicinity map tabulations

Planning Commission Minutes – October 26, 2017

building prior to the construction of the main residence on a lot in the Nemelka

Lane subdivision located at 1505 East 900 South.

Second: Commissioner Garrett

Vote: Unanimous

Item 5. Adjourn.

__________________________________________ ____________________________

April Houser, Executive Secretary Date