Reprint of “Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice”

Download Reprint of “Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice”

Post on 01-Feb-2017




0 download

Embed Size (px)


  • Rrd












    Field Crops Research 165 (2014) 3648

    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

    Field Crops Research

    journa l homepage: www.e lsev ier .com/ locate / fc r

    eprint of Morphological and physiological traits of roots and theirelationships with water productivity in water-saving androught-resistant rice

    uang Chua, Tingting Chena, Zhiqin Wanga, Jianchang Yanga,, Jianhua Zhangb,1

    Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaSchool of Life Sciences and State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    r t i c l e i n f o

    rticle history:eceived 7 September 2013eceived in revised form 5 November 2013ccepted 12 November 2013vailable online 17 July 2014

    eywords:ater-saving and drought-resistant rice

    Oryza sativa L.)oot morpho-physiological traitsrain fillinglternate wetting and dryingrain yieldater productivity.

    a b s t r a c t

    Water-saving and drought-resistant rice (WDR) could substantially reduce irrigation water and mean-while produce higher grain yield compared with paddy rice under water-saving irrigation. Themechanism underlain, however, is yet to be understood. We investigated if improved root traits wouldcontribute to an increase in water productivity inWDR. Two rice varieties, each forWDR and paddy rice,were field-grownwith two irrigationmethods, continuous flooding (CF) and alternatewetting anddrying(AWD) irrigation, which were imposed during the whole growing season. Under CF, grain yield, waterproductivity (grain yield over amount irrigation water and precipitation) and root morpho-physiologicaltraits, such as root biomass and root oxidation activity (ROA), showed no significant difference betweenWDR and paddy rice. Under AWD, however, WDR exhibited greater root dry weight, root length density,ROA, total absorbing surface area and active absorbing surface area of roots, greater zeatin (Z) + zeatinriboside (ZR) contents in both roots and leaves, and higher activities of enzymes involved in sucrose-to-starch conversion in grains during grain filing, in relative to paddy rice. Grain yield under AWD wassignificantly decreased for paddy rice comparedwith that under CF, but showed no significant differenceforWDR between the two irrigation treatments. TheWDR variety increased grain yield by 9.213.4% andwater productivity by 9.013.7% over the paddy rice variety under AWD. The root dry weight was signif-

    icantly correlated with shoot dry weight, and ROA and root Z +ZR content were significantly correlatedwith leaf photosynthetic rate, Z +ZR content in leaves and activities of key enzymes involved in sucrose-to-starch conversion in grains. Collectively, the data suggest that improved morpho-physiological traits,as showing a greater root biomass, root length density, ROA and root Z +ZR content, contributes to highergrain yield and water productivity for WDR under water-saving irrigation.

    2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.. IntroductionRice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important food crops inhe world and consumed by more than 3 billion people (Fageria,

    DOI of original article: AGPase, adenosine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase; AWD,

    lternate wetting and drying; CF, continuous flooding; DAT, days after transplan-ing; DW, dry weight; ROA, root oxidation activity; StSase, starch synthase; SuSase,ucrose synthase; WDR, water-saving and drought-resistant rice; Z, zeatin; ZR,eatin riboside. This article is a reprint of a previously published article. For citation purposes,leaseuse theoriginal publicationdetails Field Crops Research 162 (2014) 108119. Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 514 8797 9317, fax: +86 514 8797 9317.

    E-mail addresses:, (J. Yang), (J. Zhang).1 Tel.: +852 3943 6288, fax: +852 2603 6382.

    ttp:// 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.2007). It is estimated that, by the year 2025, it will be necessary toproduce about 60% more rice than what is currently produced tomeet the food needs of a growingworld population (Fageria, 2007).Rice is also the greatest consumer of water among all crops andconsumes about 80% of the total irrigated fresh water resources inAsia (Bouman and Tuong, 2001). Fresh water, however, is becom-ing increasingly scarce because of population growth, increasingurban and industrial development, and the decreasing availabilityresulting frompollution and resource depletion (Belder et al., 2004;Bouman, 2007). To meet the major challenge that rice productionneeds to increase to feed a growing population under increasingscarcity of water resources, water-saving and drought-resistant

    rice (WDR) varieties have been bred (Luo, 2010) and alternatewetting and drying (AWD) irrigation has been developed as a novelwater-saving technique (Bouman and Tuong, 2001; Yang et al.,2007; Yao et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2009).

  • s Research 165 (2014) 3648 37








    Table 1Precipitation, sunshine hours, and mean temperature during the growing season ofrice in 2011 and 2012 in Yangzhou, Southeast China.

    May June July August September October

    Precipitation (mm per month)2011 103 195 309 232 48.2 38.62012 38.2 32.2 195 213 60.6 27.2

    Sunshine (h per month)2011 241 118 143 115 159 1632012 202 101 173 122 172 171

    Mean temperature (C)2011 21.9 24.4 27.5 26.7 22.7 20.42012 22.1 25.3 29.3 27.9 22.2 19.5G. Chu et al. / Field Crop

    WDR is a new type of rice variety which has high yield potentialnd good quality as the current paddy rice, as well as the capacityf water-saving or drought resistance (Luo, 2010; Luo et al., 2011).here are reports showing thatWDR could reducewater consump-ion by about 50% meanwhile could not markedly decease grainield compared with paddy rice (Luo, 2010; Luo et al., 2011; Zhangt al., 2012a), although there is an observation that the super hybridice variety Yangliangyou 6 produced 21.5% higher grain yield thanheWDRvarietyHanyou3under AWDconditions (Yao et al., 2012).he mechanism that WDR has high yield potential and capacity ofater-saving has yet to be understood.In AWD, irrigation is applied a few days after water has dis-

    ppeared from the surface so that periods of soil submergencelternatewithperiodsofnon-submergenceduring thewholegrow-ng season (Belder et al., 2004; Tuong et al., 2005; Yao et al.,012). This technique could substantially reduce irrigation waternd maintain or even increase grain yield because of the enhance-ent in nutrient uptake by rice plants, root growth, grain filling

    ate, and remobilization of carbon reserves from vegetative tissueso grains, in relative to continuous flooding (CF) irrigation (Beldert al., 2004; Liu et al., 2013; Tuong et al., 2005; Yao et al., 2012;hang et al., 2008, 2009, 2012b). Although the AWD technology haseen researched extensively in countries such as China, India, andhilippines, the physiological mechanism involved in the effect ofWD on the yield andwater productivity remains to be elucidated.As an integral part of plant organs, roots are involved in acqui-

    ition of nutrients and water, synthesis of plant hormones, organiccids and amino acids, and anchorage of plants (Yang et al.,004a,b). Root morphology and physiology are closely associatedith the growth and development of aboveground plants (Osakit al., 1997; Samejima et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2008; Zhang et al.,009). However, information on root morphology and physiologynd their relationship with grain yield and water productivity inDR is unavalable.The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate the yield

    erformance ofWDR under both CF and AWD conditions, (2) makeomparison between WDR and paddy rice in root morphologicalnd physiological traits, and (3) analyze the relationship betweenoot morpho-physiological traits and shoot growth and activity.oot biomass, root oxidation activity (ROA), root length density,oot diameter, root total absorbing surface area, root active absorb-ng surface area and zeatin (Z) + zeatin riboside (ZR) contents inoots were defined as root morphological and physiological traitsSamejima et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2009). Shootiomass, leaf photosynthetic rate, Z +ZR content in leaves, andctivities of some key enzymes involved in sucrose-to-starch con-ersion in grains, sucrose synthase (SuSase, EC, adenosineiphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase, EC, andtarch synthase (StSase, EC, were used as indices of shootrowth and activity. The hypothesis is that improved root traits canenefit shoot growth, and consequently, contribute to an increasen water productivity in WDR under water-saving irrigation.

    . Materials and methods

    .1. Plant materials and growth conditions

    Field experiments were conducted at a research farm ofangzhou University, Jiangsu Province, China (32o30N, 119o25E,1m altitude) during the rice growing season (MayOctober) in011, and repeated in 2012. The soil was a sandy loam (Typic

    uvaquents, Etisols, US classification) that contained 24.2 gkg1

    rganic matter, 103mgkg1 alkali hydrolysable N, 34.5mgkg1

    lsen-P and 68.6mgkg1 exchangeable K in 020 cm soil depth.he field capacity soil moisture content, measured after constantPrecipitation and sunshine hours aremonthly totals. Temperatures are themonthlyaverages.

    drainage rate and made gravimetrically, was 0.188gg1, and bulkdensity of the soil was 1.33g cm3. The average air temperature,precipitation, and sunshine hours during the rice growing seasonacross the two study years measured at a weather station close tothe experimental site are shown in Table 1.

    AWDR (Oryza sativa L.) varietyHanyou8 (HY8, a japonicahybridfrom the cross Huhan 2AHuhan 2B) and a high-yielding paddyrice variety Lingxiangyou 18 (LXY18, a japonica hybrid from thecross Lingxiang AYC418) were grown in the field. Both vari-eties are currently planted in local production. Except for droughtresistance, both varieties have similar traits with plant height105110 cm, the whole growth period 152155 days, 17 leaves inthe main stem, thick culms and erect upper leaves, and are suit-able for planting in the lower reaches of Yangtze River of China(Li et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2011). Seeds of HY8 were provided byShanghai Agrobiological Gene Center (Shanghai, China) and thoseof LXY18were obtained fromCollege of Agriculture, YangzhouUni-versity (Yangzhou, China). Seedlings were raised in the field withsowing date on 15 May and transplanted on 10 June at a hill spac-ing of 25 cm16 cm with two seedlings per hill. N (60kgha1 asurea, P (45kgha1 as single superphosphate) and K (60kgha1

    as KCl) were applied and incorporated before transplanting. N asurea was also applied at mid-tillering (40kgha1), panicle ini-tiation (25kgha1) and at the initial of spikelet differentiation(25kgha1). Bothvarieties (50%ofplants) headedon2526August,and were harvested on 1516 October.

    2.2. Treatments

    The experiment was laid out in a complete randomized blockdesign with three replicates. Plot dimension was 8m4.8m andplotswere separated by a 1-mwide alley using plastic film insertedinto the soil to a depth of 50 cm. Two irrigation regimes (treat-ments), alternate wetting and soil drying (AWD) and continuousflooding (CF), were conducted from 10 days after transplanting(DAT), at which seedlings were recovered from transplantinginjury, to maturity. In AWD, plants were not re-watered untilthe soil water potential reached 15kPa (soil moisture content0.172gg1) at 1520 cm depth. Except drainage at themid-season,the CF regimewas continuously floodedwith 23 cmwater level inthe plot until oneweek before harvest in linewith traditional farm-ing practice. Soil water potential in the AWD plot was monitoredat 1520-cm soil depth with a tensionmeter consisting of a sen-sor of 5 cm length. Four tensionmeters were installed in each plot,

    and readings were recorded at 12:00h each day. When the read-ing reached the threshold, a flood with 23 cm water depth wasapplied to the plots. The amount of irrigationwater wasmonitoredwith a flow meter (LXSG-50 Flow meter, Shanghai Water Meter

  • 3 s Rese







    8 G. Chu et al. / Field Crop

    anufacturing Factory, Shanghai, China) installed in the irrigationipelines.

    .3. Sampling and measurements

    Leafwaterpotentialsof the top full-expanded leavesweredeter-ined at midday (11:30h) at 41, 52, 66, 90, and 101 DAT in 2011nd at 40, 51, 74, 91 and 102 DAT in 2012 when days were clearnd soil water potential was approximately 15kPa in the AWDegime. A pressure chamber (Model 3000, SoilMoisture Equipmentorp., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was used for leaf water potentialeasurement, with six leaves for each treatment.Root and shoot biomass, root length, root length density, spe-

    ific root length, root diameter, root total absorbing surface areand root active absorbing surface area were determined at 1920,041, 7576 and 124125 DAT. The growth stages correspond-ng above dates weremid-tillering, panicle initiation, heading timend maturity, respectively. ROA, Z +ZR contents in both roots andeaves, leaf photosynthetic rate, and activities of SuSase, AGPasend StSase in grains were determined at 9091 (D1) and 101102D2) DATwhen soil water potential was about15kPa in the AWDlot and at 9293 (W1) and 103104 (W2) DAT when plants wereewatered. To maintain canopy conditions, the vacant spaces leftfter sampling formeasurements of root and shoot biomassesweremmediately replaced with hills taken from the borders and theseeplanted hills were not subjected to sampling any more.

    For each root sampling, a cube of soil (25 cm in length16 cm inidth20 cm in depth) around each individual hill was removedp using a sampling core. Such a cube contains approximately 95%f total root biomass (Kukal and Aggarwal, 2003; Yang et al., 2008).

    lants of five hills from each plot formed a sample at each mea-urement. The cube of soil was cut into two parts, with 10 cmepth for each part. The roots in each cube of soil were carefullyinsed with hydropneumatic elutriation device (Gillisons Variety

    ig. 1. Soil water potentials for the water-saving and drought-resistant rice variety HY8nd alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation in 2011 (A and C) and 2012 (B and D)ars represent standard error of the mean (n=12) where these exceed the size of the syarch 165 (2014) 3648

    Fabrications, Benzonia, MI, USA). After combining roots of five hillsand recording freshweight, about 10g roots fromeach samplewerefrozen in liquid N for 1min and then stored at8...


View more >