redacted erm - creek realignment project plan for the creek realignment project (the...

07211253

Creek Realignment ProjectThird SiteZionsville, Indiana

March 12, 1996

Project No. 5045

ERM-EnviroClean-North Central, Inc.540 Lake Cook Road, Suite 300

Deerfield, Illinois 60015

ERM

CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

1.1 BACKGROUND 1

1.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES 1

2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION 3

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORICAL LAND USE 3

2.2 GEOLOGY 4

2.3 NA TURE AND EXTENT OF VOXS 42.3.1 VOX Distribution 52.3.2 SVOC Distribution 62.3.3 Inorganics Distribution 6

2.4 POND CONDITIONS 7

2.5 STREAMLINED RISK EVALUATION 7

3.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT 9

3.1 SCOPE OF WORK 9

3.2 SCHEDULE 10

4.0 FUTURE REMEDIATION ACTIONS 11

APPENDIX:

A A UTHORIZA TION LETTER TO CONDUCTSUR VEY

LIST OF TABLES

1 Concentrations of Compounds Detected in Subsurface Soils

2 Concentrations of Compounds Detected in Ground Water

u

LIST OF FIGURES

1 Surface Water Sampling Locations

2 Historical Land Use

3 Soil Boring Locations, ERM-North Central, Inc.

4 Soil Boring Locations, CHJti Hill, 1988

5 VOC Distribution in Soil Samples, 872-880 Depth Interval

6 VOC Distribution in Soil Samples, 864-872 Depth Interval

7 Surface Seepage Samples Detected Compounds (August 1987)

7A Key to Analytical Abbreviations

8 Soil Sample Data

9 Pond and Berm Cross Section

10 Creek Realignment Components

in

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This plan for the Creek Realignment Project (the "Project") has beenprepared as a Time Critical Action at Third Site, located north ofZionsville, Indiana. Third Site is located approximately 300 feet south ofthe Enviro-Chem Corporation (ECC) Superfund Site on a bend in FinleyCreek between an artificial pond (Bankert's Pond) and the creek(Figure 1).

1.1 BACKGROUND

Between 1987 and 1990, field investigations of Third Site wereconducted by ERM-North Central, on behalf of the ECC PotentiallyResponsible Parties, and CH2M Hill, on behalf of the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (USEPA). The results of the soil and ground waterinvestigations indicate that Third Site consists of the area shownapproximately on Figure 1, and that the primary significant chemicalconstituents are chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOXs) asdiscussed in Section 2.3 of this document. The extent of the VOXs, ifany, in the soil under Bankert's Pond is unknown.

1.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of the proposed Project to be conducted at Third Site is tosignificantly reduce the risk of a sudden discharge of VOXs to FinleyCreek. This will be accomplished by realigning the "oxbow" bendportion of Finley Creek that is presently adjacent to Third Site so as toshift the creek channel approximately 40 feet away from soils containingVOXs.

This project consists of realigning the "oxbow" bend in Finley Creekadjacent to Third Site. This Project is being undertaken as a TimeCritical Action because of the following conditions:

• There exists the potential for contamination of drinking watersupplies;

• There are VOXs in the soils at Third Site at or near the surfacethat may migrate;

• There are weather conditions such as spring rains andaccompanying high flows in Finley Creek that may cause VOXsto be suddenly released to Finley Creek through rapid erosionand/or a breach of the berm; and

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL. INC. I CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

• Finley Creek feeds the Eagle Creek Reservoir, which is source ofdrinking water to the City of Indianapolis.

As a Time Critical Action, the Project should begin as soon as possibleto reduce the immediate threat to public health and the environment.

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL, INC. / CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION

This section summarizes the available geological and chemicalinformation for Third Site, obtained from the following reports:

• CH2M Hill, Technical Memorandum No. 2, September 16, 1988.

• ERM-North Central, So/7 Boring Investigation, Vicinity of FinleyCreek, August 21, 1987.

• ERM-North Central, Third Site, Ground Water Sample Results, July1992.

• ERM-North Central, Third Site, Investigation of Fishing Pond, April1990.

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORICAL LAND USE

Third Site is located north of Zionsville, Indiana, about 10 milesnorthwest of Indianapolis, 300 feet south of the ECC Superfund Site,and some 350 to 400 feet southwest of the Northside Sanitary LandfillSuperfund Site. The Site is within the Rosston, Boone County, Indiana,U.S. Geological Survey topographic map quadrangle.

ERM-North Central conducted a review of the historical land use ofThird Site area by examining aerial photographs, dated from 1950 to1986. The results of this historical aerial photograph review aresummarized in a September 21, 1987, letter to USEPA. As illustrated onFigure 2, portions of the area were used for truck parking and tank anddrum storage during in the middle to late 1970s. A portion of the areato the north of Third Site was developed as a fishing pond after May 3,1986 (i.e., the date of the most recent aerial photograph available at thetime of the review). According to the property owners, the pond wascreated by excavating materials from the area to depths of up to 15 feetand using those materials to build a berm around the southwestern,southern, and southeastern sides of the pond and to regrade the areabetween the pond and Finley Creek. These excavation activities appearto have concentrated the VOXs into the berm and regraded areas. TheVOXs were apparently associated with the activities described above.

Third Site is estimated to cover an 0.6 acres. An unpaved roadwayprovides construction access to the area. The nearest residence is the

resident located approximately 220 feet to the north, northwestof the western Third Site boundary.

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL. INC. J CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

2.2 GEOLOGY

The subsurface geologic setting in the Third Site area is complicated dueto the depositional history as well as the excavation and earth movingthat led to the creation of the fishing pond. Soil borings were drilled atthe site by ERM-North Central in 1987 and are identified as "SB"locations as shown in Figure 3. USEPA drilled a series of borings in1988, which covered the area between ECC and Third Site as shown inFigure 4.

In general, the surficial materials consist of up to 10 feet of fill with ahigh clay content overlying a discontinuous clay till or alluvium.Several sand lenses within this upper alluvial unit were not fullypenetrated during the advancement of the soil borings (i.e., at soilborings Nos. 4, 5, 9, 10, and 11). However, the sand or sand and gravelappear to be discontinuous lenses within the alluvium. Also, a sandand gravel unit of variable thickness underlies the alluvium. Becausethis sand and gravel unit varies both in color and apparent composition,it is likely an admixture of sands derived from glacial outwash andsands deposited by more recent alluvial processes associated with theFinley Creek drainage system.

The deepest unit penetrated in any of the soil borings in the vicinity ofThird Site is a clayey, dense silt till encountered at a maximum depth ofapproximately 20 to 30 feet. Although this lower till was not penetratedto determine its total thickness, the density and dryness of samplescollected from this unit are indicative of low permeability. Therefore,any downward migration of ground water would be effectively limitedby this layer.

The water level in Bankert's Pond is approximately 6 feet above theaverage water level in Finley Creek. The higher water level in the pondcreates a significant head difference between Bankert's Pond and FinleyCreek, which increases the potential for discharge of VOXs to FinleyCreek. The head difference between the pond and the underlying sandand gravel layers and Finley Creek causes any water flow to be fromthe pond to the sand and gravel layers, and then into Finley Creek.

2.3 NATURE AND EXTENT OF VOXs

The nature and extent of VOXs at the site was determined by evaluatingdata collected by:

• ERM-North Central in 1987, which includes field screening resultsfor VOXs, and laboratory analytical data for soil, ground water,seepage soil, and seepage water samples.

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL. INC '* CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

CH2M Hill in 1988, which included laboratory analytical resultsfor soil and ground water samples.

ERM-North Central in 1992, which included samples of groundwater that were split with Ecology and Environment. Theanalytical results for VOXs, semivolatile organic compounds(SVOCs), and inorganics are discussed in the followingsubsections.

2.3.1 VOX Distribution

Based on field screening results obtained for soil samples collected byERM-North Central during 1987, an area of VOX-impacted soil existswithin a larger area of minimally impacted soil between Bankert's Pondand Finley Creek. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the approximate horizontaland vertical distribution of VOXs at Third Site based on headspacemeasurements of soil samples collected during the August 1987 ERM-North Central investigation. The seepage samples, collected during thesame year, consisted of surficial soil and water samples from two areasof observable ground water seepage. These samples also containedVOXs. The seepage sample locations as well as their VOXconcentrations are shown on Figure 7. Examples of the types ofcompounds encountered in the seepage samples and their ranges ofdetected values are:

Compound Seepage/Water Surficial Soil

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 to 120 mg/L 4.9 to 36.5 mg/g

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.8 to 23 mg/L 1.4 to 1.6 mg/g

1,2-Dichlorobenzene .185 to 4.6 mg/L 8.8 to 38.4 mg/g

Xylenes .1 to 2.48 mg/L 2.0 to 7.4 mg/g

Vinyl chloride .444 to 1.64 mg/L nondetect

The analytical results for Third Site soil samples collected by ERM-North Central and CH2M Hill are presented in Figure 8 and in Table 1.The VOXs detected in the near-surface soils at borings SB-11 and SB-12appear to be related to the use of this area for truck parking in themiddle 1970s. The compounds detected are those typically found indiesel fuel, notably toluene and total xylenes. The VOXs at Third Siteconsist primarily of halogenated VOXs, toluene, and xylenes, and areconcentrated along the southeastern bank of Bankert's Pond. Thissoutheastern bank of the pond was formed when an estimated 6 to 8feet of fill materials were placed in the area between the Pond andFinley Creek. Total VOXs in the soil samples ranged from not detectedto 6,018 mg/kg. Examples of the types of VOX compounds encountered

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL. INC. O CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

in the soil samples taken from soil borings and their ranges of detectedvalues are:

Compound Subsurface Soil Samples

Chloromethane Not detected to .003 mg/kgChloroethane Not detected to .018 mg/kgCarbon disulfide Not detected to .004 mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethene Not detected to 2.1 mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethane Not detected to 5.2 mg/kgcis-l,2-Dichloroethene Not detected to 58.5 mg/kgtrans-l,2-Dichloroethene Not detected to 1.6 mg/kg1,2-Dichloroethene (total) Not detected to 14.000 mg/kgMethylene chloride Not detected to .008 mg/kgChloroform Not detected to 2.8 mg/kg2-Butanone Not detected to 1.7 mg/kgTetrachloroethene Not detected to 588 mg/kg1,1,1-Trichloroethane Not detected to 913 mg/kgVinyl chloride Not detected to .070 mg/kgTrichloroethene Not detected to 3310 mg/kgToluene Not detected to 57 mg/kgEthyl benzene Not detected to 164 mg/kgXylenes (total) Not detected to 1020 mg/kg

VOXs were also detected in ground water samples but their source(s) isuncertain. The analytical results for Third Site ground water samplescollected by ERM-North Central and CH2M Hill are presented in Table2.

We know of no data concerning VOX concentrations or SVOCconcentrations, if any, in the pond water.

2.3.2 SVOC Distribution

The following SVOCs were detected in the soil samples collected fromthe Third Site area limits shown in Figure 8: 1,2-dichlorobenzene; di-n-butyl phthalate; and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. Only the ground watersamples collected from the MW-19 well pair contained SVOCs, and onlytwo SVOCs were detected in these samples (i.e., 1,2-dichlorobenzeneand 1,4-dichlorobenzene). The source(s) of SVOCs detected in theground water is uncertain. In general, the dichlorobenzenes wereassociated with the VOXs and were detected at concentrations withinthe same order of magnitude or less than the VOX concentrations. Theanalytical results for Third Site ground water samples collected by ERM-North Central and CH2M Hill are presented in Table 2.

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL. INC. O CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

2.3.3 Inorganics Distribution

No inorganics were detected above background levels in the groundwater samples collected by CH2M Hill. Aluminum, antimony, barium,cadmium, and silver were detected slightly above background in somesamples collected by CH2M Hill. These results are shown on Figure 8.

2.4 POND CONDITIONS

The configuration of the bottom of the pond was determined byERM-North Central in March 1990 (see Figure 9). As shown in Figure 9,the bottom of the pond is deeper than Finley Creek, and a headdifference of approximately 6 feet exist between the water surfaces ofthe pond and Finley Creek at the time of the pond bottom wassurveyed. A sand and gravel unit was identified in monitoring wellMW-19B during CH2M Hill's 1988 study. A limited volume of seepagefrom this unit was observed by ERM-North Central in 1987 along FinleyCreek. The existence of this head difference and the low seepage rateindicate that the sand and gravel unit is not continuous from the pondto the creek.

2.5 STREAMLINED RISK EVALUATION

During the ERM-North Central investigation, VOXs were found insamples of seepage migrating into Finley Creek. Based on the analyticalresults for the water samples collected by the USEPA under normalflow conditions from Finley Creek, Eagle Creek, and Eagle CreekReservoir, the VOXs volatilize as they are transported by the creekwater.

During periods of high flows in Finley Creek there is a risk that rapiderosion and resulting instability of the stream bank adjacent to the sitecould greatly and suddenly increase the amount of soils containingVOXs entering the Creek. An increase in the rate of flow is typicallyobserved during springtime and early summer. In view of theconnection of Finley Creek to the Eagle Creek Reservoir, which is asource of drinking water for the City of Indianapolis, a Time CriticalAction is warranted because:

• There exists the potential for contamination of drinking watersupplies;

• There are VOXs in the soil at or near the surface that maymigrate; and

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL, INC. / CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

There are weather conditions (i.e., spring rains and subsequenthigh flows in Finley Creek) that may cause VOXs to be suddenlyreleased through rapid erosion and/or a breach of the berm.

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL, INC. 8 CREEK REALIGNMENT PROfECT

3.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT

The objective of the Project is to significantly reduce the risk of asudden discharge of VOXs to Finley Creek. To reduce this risk, the"oxbow" bend in Finley Creek, which is adjacent to Third Site, will berealigned away from the soil area containing VOXs.

The components of the Project (Figure 10) consist of:

• Excavation of a creek cutoff to divert Finley Creek from the"oxbow" bend adjacent to the VOX containing soil at Third Site,and

• Closure of the upper end (upstream) of the "oxbow" with a soildam and then fill the former "oxbow" creek bed adjacent to ThirdSite with excavated material from the creek cutoff.

Diverting the creek water through an excavated cutoff that bisects theFinley Creek meander (Figure 10) will: (1) reduce the potential for eithergradual or sudden migration of VOXs into the creek, (2) reduce the riskthat surface water from Finley Creek will enter the VOX containingsoils, and (3) stabilize the creek bank to prevent erosion or sloughing ofsoils during future remediation.

Diverting Finley Creek will require meeting the substantiverequirements of: (1) the Indiana Department of Natural Resourcespermit for construction in a floodway, and (2) the Department of theArmy, Nationwide Permit, 33 CFR 325. As this work meets theUSEPA's National Contingency Plan definition of on site, actual permitsare not required. A review of aerial photographs of the site takenbetween 1950 and 1986 shows there has been no industrial or disposalactivities to the south of Finley Creek in the area of the creekrealignment.

3.1 SCOPE OF WORK

Figure 10 indicates a preliminary location plan for the proposed channeldiversion. The final location and channel design will be determinedbased on completion of the following items:

• Site survey and analysis of proposed location for the channeldiversion,

• A cross-sectional survey of the existing "oxbow" bend along withsections upstream and downstream of the proposed channeldiversion,

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL, INC. 7 CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

• A hydraulic study of the Finley Creek at the "oxbow" bend todetermine 100-year flood elevations and flow designrequirements, and

• A site survey indicating property boundaries.

Authorization from the property owner to conduct the necessarysurveys has been obtained. A copy of the authorization letter has beenincluded as Appendix A. On completion of the design, we will providethe USEPA and Indiana Department of Environmental Managementwith one design report (deliverable) containing the following:

• Existing site survey,• Hydraulic Assessment of the affected section of Finley Creek,• Plans and cross sections of proposed construction,• Erosion control plan for use during and after construction,• Construction specification, and• Schedule.

Upon approval of design documents, the construction of the proposedditch diversion will be conducted in accordance with the designdocuments and the applicable regulations.

3.2 SCHEDULE

The existing site survey and hydraulic assessment of the affected sectionof Finley Creek have been completed. The proposed schedule goingforward is as follows:

Task Schedule

Submit Revised Creek Realignment March 15, 1996Project (CRP)

Submit Design Report On or before March 18,1996

Submit Revised Design Report (if Within 10 days of receiptnecessary) of USEPA comments

Begin On-Site Mobilization and Within 10 days afterConstruction Activities USEPA's authorization to

do so based on DesignReport

The construction schedule will be provided in the Design Report.

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL, INC. 10 CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

4.0 FUTURE REMEDIATION ACTIONS

After implementation of the Project, a streamlined EngineeringEvaluation/Cost Analysis will be prepared to analyzeremoval/treatment alternatives to address the VOXs at the site.

ERM-ENVIROCLEAN-NORTH CENTRAL. INC. 11 CREEK REALIGNMENT PROJECT

TABLE ICONCENTRATIONS OF COMPOUNDSDETECTED IN SUBSURFACE SOILS <1»

THIRD SITE

ZIONSV1LLE, INDIANA

(Page 1 of 3)

Compounds

MP87-02 (2)

7/31/87

2-4' 10-12' •

MPS7-03A <2)7/31/87

4-6'

Volatile Organic Compounds

LrJoromethane

Chloroethane

Carbon Disuifide

1,1-Dichloroethene1.,1-Dichloroe thanec:is-l,2-Dichloroethenetrans-l,2-Dichloroethene1.2-Dichloroethene (Total)Methylene ChlorideAcetoneChloroform2-ButanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,1-Trichloroe thaneVinyl chlorideTrichloroetheneTolueneEthyl benzeneXvlenes (Total)

10 U

10 UNA

1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U5 U

10 U1 U

10 U1 U1 U

10 U1 U1 U1 U1 U

10 U10 U

NA1 U1 U

2.71 U

2.75 U

10 U1 U

10 U1 U1 U

10 U1 U1 U1 U

1.0

10 U10 U

N'A1 U1

24.6

1 U24.6

5 U10 U1 U

10 U7.64.910 U

15.61 U

1.711.8

1M4'

:o u:o u

N'A2.12J2.5

2 U2.510 U10 U

1 U10 U

548913

23 U331057.0164

10213

MP87-04 (2)

8/4/87

4-61 10-12'

10 U

10 UNA

1 U1.2

56.01.6

57.65 U

10 U1 U

10 U9.17.810 U

6.42.74.2

22.9

Semivolatile Organic Compoundstli-n-Butyl phthalate1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1,4-Dichloro benzeneChlorobenzenebis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButvl benzvl ohthalate

NA1 U1 U1 U

NANA

NA5.1

1 U1 U

NANA

NA23.4

1 U1 U

NANA

NA1.2SO

2 U2 U

NANA

NA31.9

1 U1 U

NANA

10 u10 U

NA1.51.6

58.51 U

58.55 U

10 U1 U

10 U450245

10 U775

10106578

MPS7-OS (2)

S/19/872-4' 12-14'

10 U

10 U

NA1 U1 U

18.01 U

18.05 U

10 U1 U

10 U1 U1 U

10 U1 U1 Ui u1 U

10 U10 U

NA1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U5 U

10 U1 U

10 U1 U1 U

10 U1 U1 UI U1 U

NA527

1 U1 U

NANA

NA2.6

1 U1 U

NANA

NAU U

1 U1 U

NANA

InontinicsAluminum/AntimonyArseniciJariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopp«rironLead

MagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA



NANANANANANANANANANANANANA

. NANANANANANANANANANA





Note:(1) Concentrations in mg/kg.(2) Samples taken during the Soil Boring Investigation, Vicinity of Finley Creek, "Soil Bonr.g Investigation. Vicinity of Finley Creek", August 21,1987.(3) Samples taken during the Ceotechnical, Hydrogeological and Supplemental Predesign Investigation, "Technical Memorandum No. 2,

G«otechnical, Hydrogeological and Supplemental Predesign Investigation", November 9,1988.

Key:

U a Compound was not detected. The value shown is the associated detection limit.J a Estimated value; or the report value a less than the contract-retired detection Umit, but greater than the instrument detection limit.

B 3 Compound detected in the associated blank sample.NA a Not analyzed.

R ' Data unusable, indicates possible false negative or very low spike sample recovery.• • » Sample results reported as "— a All compounds in all samples underwent analysis. If concentration is not listed, the compound was not

detected above instrument detection limit" in Technical Memorandum No. 2,GeotechnicaL Hydrogeological and SupplementalPredesign Investigation", November 9,1988.

TABLE 1CONCENTRATIONS OF COMPOUNDSDETECTED IN SUBSURFACE SOILS (U

THIRD SITEZIONSV1LLE, INDIANA

(Page 2 of 3)

Compounds

MP87-06 (2)3/4/87

4-6' 10-12'

SB15(3)4/7/8822-24'

Volatile Organic CompoundsChloromethaneChloroethaneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanecis- 1 ,2-Dichlo roethenetrans-l,2-Dichloroethene1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)Vtethylene ChlorideAcetoneChloroform2-ButanoneTetrachloroethene1,1, 1-TrichloroethaneViriyl chloride 'PrichloroetheneToluene:thyl benzeneXylenes (Total)

10 U10 U

NA1 U1 U

6.61 U

6.65 U

10 U1 U

10 U4.71.810 U

2.11.24.5

21.9

10 U10 U

NA1 U1 U

21.51 U

21.55 U

10 U1 U

10 U1 U1 U

10 U25

I U1.46.6

.-

--....

N'AN'A--

O.OC8O.CC8 J

--------.---

0.022----

Semivolatile Organic Compoundsdi-n-Butyl phthalate1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene.,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorobenzene)is(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

Bulvl benzvi phthalate

NA46.8

1 U1 U

NANA

NA13

I U1 U

NANA

--........

0.000]

SB15A (3)4/19/88

6-8'

SB13 (3)4/14/8S

26-28'

SB18A (3)4A9/88

2-4' 4-6' 6-8'

- -

------

NANA

0.008 J------

0340 J0.0350.013 J

0.046 1 --0.0770.020 J0.024 f

---.

.-

.-

0.650 JNAN'A4.4----.-

1.2 J--1.0.-

17.0--

0.740 J--

----

-.•

..

N'AN'A

33--------

5138

--240

3 J1250

..-.--....

NANA

2.4--------

0.470 J0320 J--

13000320 I0.220 J

1.1

..

..

N'ANA

1.5

..

0.240 J1.4

0.75014

' 2377

NANANANANANA

2.9 B..--....-.

NANAN'ANAN'AN'A

--16

-.....--

N'AN'AN'ANANANA

InorganicsAluminumAntimonyArsenicSaiiumieryllium

CadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperron

LeadMagnesiumManganesedercury

NickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc



4,620.-

3344.--.

854009.7

5119 J,B

11,6006-3 J

29400 J2650.215

1,000 J0.15 J

2 1210 J, B

.-9.4 J51


3330 J79JS3J29 J

0.42 J6.2 J

110,000 J----17 J,B

9,910 J8.21

23,100 J332 J--• -

1,030 J

6.1 I134 J-•1386


18,1009.4 R65

97.70.63 J--

39,800233 B103273 B

20,400 J9.6 J

12,900618--22.4

3,1303.4 J

-----.

48 R108

N'ANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

Note:(1) Concentrations in mg/kg.(2) Samples taken during the Soil Boring Investigation, Vicinity of Finley Creek. "Soil Boring Investigation, Vicinity of Finley Creek", August 21,1987.(3) Samples taken during the Geotechnical, Hydrogeological and Supplemental Predesign Investigation, Technical Memorandum No. 2,

Geotechnical, Hydrogeological and Supplemental Predesign Investigation", November 9,1988.

Key:U a Compound was not detected. The value shown is the associated detection limit

J » Estimated value; or the report value is less than the contract-required detection limit, but greater than the instrument detection limitB a Compound detected in the associated blank sample.

NA » Not analyzed.R a Data unusable, indicates possible false negative or very tow spike sample recovery.

- - » Sample results reported as "— a All compounds in all samples underwent analysis. If concentration is not listed, the compound was notdetected above instrument detection limit" in Technical Memorandum No. 2,C«otechnical, Hydrogeological and SupplementalPredesign Investigation", November 9,1988.

TABLE!CONCENTRATIONS OF COMPOUNDSDETECTED IN SUBSURFACE SOILS (1)

THIRD SITEZIONSVILLE, INDIANA

(Page 3 of 3)

Compounds

SB18A (3)4/19/88

8-10'Volatile Organic CompoundsChloromethaneGilo roe thaneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichlo roe thanecis-l,2-Dichloroethenetrans-l,2-Dichloroethene1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)Methylene ChlorideAcetoneChloroform2-ButanoneTetrachloroethene1,1,1-TrichIoroethaneVinyl chlorideTrichloroetheneTolueneEthyl benzeneXylenes (Total)

- ---- ---

0.640 JNANA

14,000.-

--1218

--512.74.415

10-12' 26-28' 28-30'

--------• -

NANA--• •

•----

0350 J0.180 J

• -0.740

2.6-•

0.170 I

0.003 J0.0180.004 J0.250 J

5.2 JNANA

5.6 J----2-3 J

--31!39 J

0.070 J150 J

2 J6^00 ;

25 J

. ..

------

0390 JNANA

14• ---

0.650 J17J8.712

--552.7 I1-5 I

• 5.7 J

SB19 (3)VI 4/8824-26'

----------

NANA

0.002 J.

----

0.170------

0.0120.160

----

Semivolatile Organic Compoundsdi-n-Butyl phthalate1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobenzeneChloro benzenebis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateButyl benzvl phthalate

NANANANANANA

0.250 JB28

--------

0490 B2.9

--------

0.170 JB9.9 J

0.065 I--

0.070 J--

34 B------

0.025 J--

InorganicsAluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperironLeadVfagnesiumVfanganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc


9,980154 R5.8

56.2046 J

101,00015.6 B

7 J24.3 B

15,900 J5.9 J

28,100355--1532940..1.4 J....354 R414



6390 J74 J

4 J57 J--53 J

95300 J93J--18 J, B

12400 J6.1 J

26,900]307 I----

1,910

53 J1821--2262

Note(1) Concentrations in mg/kg.(2) Samples taken during the Soil Boring Investigation. Vicinity of Finley Creek, "Soil Boring Investigation. Vicinity of Finley Creek*, August 21,1987.(3) Samples taken during the GeotechnicaL Hydrogeological and Supplemental Predesign Investigation, Technical Memorandum No. 2,

Geotechnical, Hydrogeological and Supplemental Predesign Investigation", November 9,1988.

Key:U a Compound was not detected. The value shown is the associated detection limitJ a Estimated value; or the report value is less than the contract-required detection limit, but greater than the instrument detection limitB a Compound detected in the associated blank sample.

NA a Not analyzed.R a Data unusable, indicates possible false negative or very low spike sample recovery.

- - a Sample results reported as "— a All compounds in all samples underwent analysis. If concentration is not listed, the compound was notdetected above instrument detection limit" in Technical Memorandum No. 2,Geotechnical, Hydrogeological and SupplementalPredesign Investigation", November 9,1988.

TABLE 2CONCENTRATIONS OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN GROUND WATER (1)

THIRD SITEZIONSV1U.E, INDIANA

(PigelofJ)

Compounds

MPS7-02 (2)Temporary

07/31/87Volitile Organic Compound*U.I-Trichloroethaiwl.l-Dfchloroethanel.l-Okhlomethenecis-I,2-Dichlororetrienetrans-l,2-Dichlorore*heneU-Dichlororethene (Total)AcetonetenzeneMethylene ChlorideChloroethane:thyl benzene*etrachk)roetheneToluene'richlofoetheneVinyl chlorideXvlene (Total)Semivoljtile Organic Compounttwnol

Diethylphthalatedi-n-Diitylphlhalarel̂ -Dkhloroben7ene,4-Dkhlorobenzenel-Melhylnaphthalene

2.4-OichlorophenolChlorobenzene>is<2-Elhvlhei<vl)phthalatenorRanic Compounds•illered SamplesAluminumAntimonyArseniclariumkryllium

CadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperron

LeadMagnesiumManganese-iercury

Nickel'otassium

SeleniumSilverSodiumnallium

VanadiumZinc

Unfiltertd SamplesAluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel

PotassiumSelenium5*lv«rBodiumThalliumVanadiumline

13.2

0461

0235378

0133

379330010 U0050 U0250 U0.500 U0419

00580161

0.2770934

1.5s

NANANA

189005 UNANA

005 UNA



MFS7-03A 12)

Temporary07/3 1/17

1251.76.

0.500 U12.8

0.500 U13.3

0.010 U0.500 U

2.5 U5.0 U

2.72

8.52.95

2815.0 U

13.1

NANANA

7.72

0.50 UNANA

050 UNA



MP»7-4 (2)

TemporaryMAJ4/S7

71

0.005 U998163

0.194163.194

0.14000090025 U

1.13

4.115.8

2.23

1813.62

217

NANANA13.1

0.005 UNANA

0.007NA

MPS745I2)

TemporaryOSAH/S7

0.41

08040.014il

0.0812.1810.010 U0001 U0.005 U0.5670.0020.0180.0150.0400.6070078

NANANA

0.0790.001 U

NANA

0.001 UNA




NANANANANANANANANA-NANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

MPB7-0* (2)Temporary

09/04/17

0.071100690018

4.90.0864.9860010 U0.001 U0.005 U0.0140001

0016

0010

0.0470.2700.060

NANANA

0.0020.001 U

NANA

0001

NA

ECC-MW-15 (3)MW-1504/27/SS

..

.-NANA

--

0006 J

- -

0.021 8

ECC-MW-17U)MW-1704/27/8*

NANA....

-.

..

..

.-

- -0.004 J

- -

--

0013 JB

ECC-MW-UU)MW-ll04/27/8*

-.

NANA

.-

-.

--

0.013 JB

MW-1 (4)MW-U

04/23/92

0.010 U0.010 U0010 U

NANA

0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0010 U

0.01 U001 U0.01 U001 U0.01 U001 U001 U0.01 U

0002 DJ



0.031 J.B—

—0.348 B

—0.0021 )

9040.011 J.B

—0.005 J.B0516 J

0.0039 |34.2

0.045—

0006 J1 18 J.B

— R

—148

——

0.038 J.B

9.2 >

0.01 1 J0.513

- -

0.005 J222

0.0260.012 J0.114 J

42.6 J0.074 J

60.9

0.781 J

—0.042 J1910 )

— R

—15.2

—0.025 J0195 |

0123 J.B—

00021 J0508

—

—966

0.008 J.D_

0004 J.B0.408 J.B

—341

009700002 J0.008 J

1.92 J— R_

16 J_

_

0.1 J3

211 )—

0.028 J1.14

00025 J0014 J

5160.05

0.05 J0.423 J

88.9 J0.723 J

14026 J

00009 J0.135 J596

0.147 J—

16.2_

0045 J0.416 J

0.382 J—

—054

—0.0031 J,B

1790.01 J.B

—0.008 J.B

6.22 J0.011 J370

0.40200002 J0006 J

1.46 J.B__ ft_

13.8

——

0.126 I.B

942 )

—0.011 J0.578

—0.0068 J

3050.073 B0016 J0064 J457 J

0.033 J7441.02 J

—0049 J

327 J

— R—

13.6_

0.019 J0.143 J


NANANANANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

(1) Concentrations in mg/L.(2) Simples taken during the Soil Doring Investigation, Vicinity of Finley Creek, "Soil Boring Investigation, Vicinity of Ftnley Creek', August 21,1987.(3) Samples taken during the Ceolechnical, Hydrogeological and Supplemental Pradesign Investigation, "Technical Memorandum No. 2,

Geotechnical, Hydrogtologtcal and Supplemental Predesign Investigation", November 9,19M.(4) Samples taken during the April 1992 ground water sampling event, " Ground Water Sample Results, " July 1992.

Kty:U * Compound w*s not detected. The value shown is the associated detection limit

J * Estimated value; or the report value b leu than the contract-required detection limit, but greater than the instrument detection limitB « Compound detected In the associated blank sample

NA • Not analyzedR * Data unusable, indicates possible bbe negative or very low spike sample recovery.

• • • Sample results reported as"— « Alt compounds in all samples underwent analysis. If concentration b not listed, the compound was notdetected above instrument detection limit" In Technical Memorandum No. 2,Ceotechnkal, Hydrogeological and SupplementalPredesign Investigation", November 9, 1988.

TABU ICONCENTRATIONS OF CONFOUNDS DETECTED IN GROUND WATER (1)

THIRD SOTZIONSVILIE. INDIANA

(Fage2of2)

>om pound*

Volatile Orgjnk Cotnpouod*U^Trichloroethane

1,1-Dkhloroctham1,1 Dkhtoroethatn*

ci*- U-Dkhlororrthen*tram- 1 ̂ -OKhlororvthcn*

1,2-Dkhloforethcm (Total)AC«K>rtC

Icnzen*rfrihylcne Chloride

ChJoroethaniEthyl benzene'etr ac hloroel hene

'oluentrriehloro«lh«m

Vinyl chloride

Xvlene (ToUl)Stm.voUtik Organ k Compound*

Phenol

Dtethylphlhalate

di-n-Butytphthaiat*

I J-Dk hlorobenzen*1 ,4-DtcMorobcnzcn.i

I-Mcthvlnaj>hlhal«m2,4-DicMofoph*r>oJ

Chlorobenzen*•tot? ElhylhexYOphthaJatc

tnorx*nic Compounds,:iliei*d Sample*AluminumAntimony

ArsenicBariumBeryllium

CadmiumCalcium

ChromiumCobaltCopper

ronLead

MagnesiumManftarttseMercury

NkkelPotassium

Selenium

SilverSodium

Thallium

VanadiumZinc

Un fill* red Samplet

AluminumAntimony

AncnkBariumBerylliumCadmium

CakiumChromiumCobalt

Copper

ronLtad

MagnesiumManxaneMMercuryNkkel

'otassiumSelenium

SilvertediumrhsllhimVanadiumZinc

MW-HA

04,-a/M

11.0

NANA

350

O.SS J

1! J

110

2.0 1

OJ10.0650.006 J

0015 IB

OLS34 J—

0024 10-404 B

——

9140012 )3

—0009 is5.72 1

0.004 |

3120-430

—0.011 JITS J

— R—

21.1—

0.006 J0213 J

7*3 |—

0.02? J0657

—0.0053 J

3200.0270-014 J

OJM IS271

0013 1

91.11.0* J

—OJM2 J

2.H J— R—

214—

0.029 JOOM J

MW-KA

M/23/n

1300.27 J

1.0 UNANA12.01.0 U1.0 U1.0 U1.0 U

0.161.0 U1.0 U

0.45 J1.0 U

034

0.002 10.01 U0.01 UU D

0.0110.002 I0.001 J

1.0 U0.002 Bl



Mtv-ni04/21/M

0340-22

NANA

OJ3

0.11

170..

..

-.0066

-.

0.034 B

0043 J.B—

0002 |0.404 B

——

9050009 J.B

— "0004 J32.11 J

—' 27.40.069

—

—1.48 J

— R

—110

——

0.052 J3

0.171 I

——

0.392

——

81-20.009 J3

—0.005 192.95

—27.4

0.079 J—

0.007 J

1.41 J— R

—132

—0005 )0003 |

Mw-in<M/23/n

035 J0.540.40 UNANA2.9

0.40 U040 U010 BJ0.40 U0.« U0.12 J0.40 U

4.6040 U040 U

0.01 U0001 J001 U

0.0650.01 U0.01 U0.01 U0.4 U

0.003 Bl

NANA .NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA


MW-20

Ot/27/M

O.OOS

0.026

NANA

0.23

0.027

0.10

-.

.-

0-ooe IB

0 026 1,80.015 J.B0.004 |0.57

—0.002 1,8

10.20.011 J.B

—0.003 J3

0.092 R—

42.90.200

—0.013 J7.06

_ g

—56.4

—0.004 J0.025 J.B

27.9 )

—0032 J

1.050-0026 J0.013

5140.065

0052035 |92.9 |

0.271 J130233 J

0.0004 )0.165 J

11-5— R

—57.0

—0066 J0.534 J

MW-20

04/23/92

033 U063033 UNANASB

033 U033 U033 U033 U033 U033 U033 U033 U0.47033 U

0.01 U0.01 U0-01 U0-01 U001 Uaoi u0.01 U033 U

0.002 Bl



MW-21Oi/Z7/U

NANA

--

0005 I

0026 8

0.254 I——

0320 B——

1040.006 13

—0.004 J31 44 1

0.0048 j303

0.142——

1.2S J3— R

—12-8

——

0056 J3

143 |—

0.017 J06*0

—0.0075

51400250025 ]0113 |76-0 J

0122 J103

2.22 /0.0002 I0.076 J

4.440 J— R

—133

—0.022 |0324 J

MW-2104/13*2

0.01 U001 U0.01 UNANA0.01 U0.01 U001 U0.01 U0.01 U001 U0.01 U001 U001 U001 U0.01 U

0.01 U001 U0.01 U001 U0.01 U001 U001 U0.01 U

0002 Bl

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANA 'NANANANANANANANANA


ECC-MW-22 <3>

MW-Z>

OMO/W

NANA

0.006 JB

0.005 1

1.97 J

0.0069 |

0398 J.B

——

1020.0123 IS0.0065 J.B

0.0212 1,8

5.14 I0.0165 J

35.10.196

0.0248 J.B2.97 |

_ £

51.4— R

0.144 J.B

2K> )— R

0.0022 J2.43 J

0.0108 J

2.439

0.2330.245

138 |825 J

00151 J738I4J J

0.599 J40.0

— It0.0031 J.B

513— R

0341 J2.43 J

MW-«(4>Mw-a04/ZM2

03S U0.60038 UNANA5.10038 U038 U0.05 J031 U038 U038 U038 U038 U0.45038 U

0.01 U0.01 U0.01 U0.01 U001 U0.01 U001 U038 U

0.002 Bl


NANANANANANANANANANANA

• NANANANANANANANANANANANA

(1) Concentrations in a»x/L(2) Samplo Ukin dura* Hit Soil Boring InrasHpllon, VkMly of Rnby Cmk. -Soil Boring Invonpllon. Vicinity at Hnley Cn*k', August 21.1987.(3) Sarnpkt tajccn diving Utt OotcchncaL Hydrogcologka] and SuppkmmtaJ Pnxteign Investigation, Technical Memorandum No. 2.

Ceotechnk*!. Hydre*eolo|rkal and Supplemental Predcalgn Inveaogatton*. November 9.1988.(4) Simple* taken during the April 1992 graunhnter sampling rnnt,' Cround Water Sample Analytical Reaulla,' July 1992.

Xer

U « Compound »» not octected. The value shown is the asaecfeted detection limit.

) - Estimated vstuc; or Inf report value is less thsn the contract-required detection limit, but greater than the Instrument detection KmiLB -Compound delected In the associated blank sample.

NA > Not analyied.R . Data umaubt s possible ISSM negative or very low spile sample recovery.

• Sample resulb reported ss'— • Ai compounds In alt samples midenvent analysis. If concentration Is not listed, the compound v/aa notdetected above instrument detection kmif In Tschreol Ktemorandum No. 2,Ceotechnicsl, HydrogeologKal and SupplementalPredesign Investigation'. November 9.1988.

I K:\CPm£S\ERtl\a«ir\a4006VC»0\STATi;EY\FlC1AD«C ftH 01. 1996 11:17 AM

APPROXIMATE THIRDSITE AREA LIMITS

SYMBOL LEGEND

0 STREAM SAMPLINGLOCATION

(45.1) TOTAL VOC«

P' o

FIGURE 1SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS

THIRD SITEZIONSVILLE. INDIANA

NOTES:BASED ON FIGURE SOF TECH MEMO 2. BYCH2M HILL. 1988.

SAMPLING LOCATIONSARE APPROXIMATE.

.ERM\

(

1~uCUil- I K.\CPfTt£S\ERy\BAT\9*OD6\*CAO\STAT^^ FEB 01. I996

\


NOTE:BASED ON FIGURE 5OF TECH MEMO 2. SYCH2M HILL, 1988.

FIGURE 2HISTORICAL LAND USE

THIRD SITEZIONSVIUE, INDIANA

.ERM

SB87-21-0-

SB87-20

® TEMPORARY MONITORING WELLS

V SURFACE SEEPS

•0- SOIL BORINGS

HJ SOIL GAS SAMPLES

0 STREAM SAMPLES SPRING 1987

FIGURE 3SOIL BORING LOCATIONS

ERM-NORTH CENTRAL, INC.THIRD SITE

ZIONSVILLE, INDIANA

NOTE:SAMPLING LOCATIONSARE APPROXIMATE.

.ERM

02/01/86 [Tun- l**KACl'fXES\E«l«\B*A94006\ACAC\ST*TRtV\nC4A[HrS FIB 01. 1996 11;13«l


SYMBOL LEGEND

CH2M HILL SOIL BORING

FIGURE 4SOIL BORING LOCATIONS

CH2M HILL 1968THIRD SITE

ZIONSVUJLE, INDIANA

NOTES:BASED ON FIGURE 5OF TECH MEMO 2. BYCH2M HILL. 1988.

SAMPLING LOCATIONSARE APPROXIMATE.

-ERM

FIGURES

VOC DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL SAMPLES872-380 DEPTH INTERVAL

THIRD SITE, ZIONSVBLLE, INDIANA

Elevation: 878-880 feet


Elevation: 874-S76 Feet

Elevation: 872-874 Feet


0.0 0.5 10 1.5 20Log rfheadspace Wai WCs (PFMV)

Source: ERM-North Central, 'Soil Boring Investigation Vicinity of Finley Creek", August, 1987.

FIGURE 6VOC DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL SAiMPLES

864-872 DEPTH INTERVALTfflRD SITE, ZIONSVILLE, INDIANA

00 0.5 1.0 1.5 ZO

Log of hea&pau total VOQ (PPMV)





Source: ERM-Noith Central, "Soil Boring Investigation Vicinity of Finley Creek", August, 1987.

L!

MPB; -07VOCs

1.2 DCBCt.2 DCEPCE1.1.1 TCATCEXYL

ma/cT964.94.71.64.22.0

MPB; -o?VOCl

CBE1.2DCB1.1 OCA1.1 DCECI.2 DCET1.2 DCEPCETOL1.1.1 TCA1.1.2 TCATCEVCXYI

mo/ LI.0032.185.322.0607

7.8.022.003.0069

1.8.0042.0099444

.1

-^fc-1

SYMBOL LEGEND

® TEMPORARY MONITORING WELLS

<? SURFACE SEEPS

•$• SOIL BORINGS

'S SOIL GAS SAMPLES

0 STREAM SAMPLES SPRING 1987

\

\HPB; -OB

vrSci1.2 OCBC1.2 DCE1,1.1 TCATCEXYL

mo/a)38.436.5

1.41.27.4

MP67-08VOCi

BENZCBECEA1.2 DCB1.1 OCA1.1 DCECI.J DCET1.2 DCEEBPCETOL1.1.1 TCA1.1.2 TCATCEVCXYL

ma/Li.0026.0174.635

4.62.43

.0086120

.635

.0656

.0189

.040723

.0164

.03191.642.48

FIGURE 7SURFACE SEEPAGE SAMPLES

DETECTED COMPOUNDS (AUGUST 1887)THIRD SITE

ZIONSVILLE, INDIANA

NOTES:DATA FROM ERM-NORTH CENTRAL.1987, SOIL BORING INVESTIGATION.VICINITY OF FINLEY CREEK.

SAMPLING LOCATIONS AREAPPROXIMATE.

SEE FIGURE 7A FOR THE KEY TOTHE COMPOUND NAMES.

.ERM

FIGURE 7A

KEY TO ANALYTICAL ABBREVIATIONSTHIRD SITE

ZIONSVILLE, INDIANA

Compounds/ Analysis Abbreviation

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

AcetoneBenzeneChlorobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformCarbon disulfide1,1-DichloroethaneDichloroethene1,1-Dichloroetheneds-l,2-Dichloroethenetrans-l,2-Dichloroethene1,2-Dichloroethene (total)Ethyl benzeneMethylene chlorideMethyl ethyl ketoneTrichloroetheneTetrachloroethene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTolueneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)

ACEBENZCBECEACHLCS2

1,1 DCADCE

1,1 DCEC1,2DCETl, 2 DCE1,2 DCE

EBMC

MEKTCEPCE

1,1,1 TCA1,1,2 TCA

TOLVC

XYL

Semivolatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)

bis (2-€thylhexyl)phthalate1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,4-Dichlorobenzene2-BethylnaphthaleneDiethyl phthalateDi-N-butyl phthalateFlourantheneFluorene2-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthalenePhenanthrene

Not analyzedNot detected

B2EHP1,2 DCB1,4 DCB2M-NAP

DEPDN-BPFLTHFLUO2MNNAP

PHEN

NA 'ND

2/1/96 I Ckiu- | K \CPni^ERU\B*r\94006\ACAO\STAratV\fXil 1AOWC FTB 01. IW« ll;47 til

LANDFILL

sail

UEXTOL

•«•.

12-14-.45J.23.92

1.202

' NOI

sat 4KTA, O -ly iB -M

1.2 DECCHLUEKTCETOLm.TOTAL

1.2 ocaFUHTOT/M.

.007

.003

.002

.002NO

.002

.016

.016

.008.OS6.1 1

.013NO

.023

.002

.087NO •

.105

NONO

.047

.047

APPROXIMATETHIRD SITE

AREA LIMITS

sa:.

Vutjfti2EHf> 1 n

\ NO

I 94

saiwWOC 4 -• 10-121,1 OCAt.2 DCCCHL1.1,1 TCATC£PCETOLLBmTOTAi.

NO2.4

NO-33U.47.3732

1.1C.13

SEMIVaL1.2 DCS h«.000

NONONO

.18

.74

.352-8

NO.17

4.04

$8162* -28 UED

5.25.62.8

31153126.8

25132.4

28,000INORGANICSAUJUtNUUAND MONT8MQUUCAOumySILVER

18,100NO•7.7

M)NO

NONONONONO

N/A

78NONO

(.28.1

SYMBOL LEGEND:

vtrvi LOCAISM

H CaflUM.

CKH NIL SOL •

VMftcf mm

AU. CONCtHHUncXS M

SAUPUNC LOUHONS ARC

FIGURE 8SOIL SAMPLE DATA

THIRD SITEZIONSVLLE, INDIANA

OATA FKOy ERU-NORTH CENTRAL,1987. SOL BORING MVCSTKATION.VKMTY Of FINLEY CHEEK, ANOCH2U HU. 1ECH UEMO 2. 1988.

SCI FtCUKE 1IA FOB IK KEYTO THE COMPOUNDS- HAUCS.

.ERM

880 —

9 870 -

860 -

830 —

VE- APPRQX. 5.1

r-890

-880

870

— 860

— 850

MONITORING WELLSHOWING SCREEN INTERVAL'

•

^[1=

FIGURE 9POND AND BERM CROSS SECTION

THIRD SITEZIONSVILLE, INDIANA .ERM

i!

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFEXISTING OVERFLOW PIPE

\

N

-*jf-'S

/

PROPOSED CHANNELREALIGNMENT(SEE NOTE 1)

. -PROPOSED EXTENSION OF' OVERFLOW PIPE

SYMBOL LEGEND

QVOX CONTAINING SOIL

NOTE: ,\\

FIGURE 10CREEK REALIGNMENT COMPONENTS

THIRD SITEZIONSVILLE, INDIANA

i. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PROPOSEDCHANNEL REALIGNMENT MAY VARYDEPENDING ON THE DESIGN SURVEYRESULTS. .ERM

APPENDIX A

AUTHORIZATION LETTER TO CONDUCT SURVEY

KUNZ AND KUNZ

Kuw. Kl*«

BWML MATTB 330 N. WPSiCU-S1 SIHEfel

November 30, 1995 F«* NO

aarn«* fi Thornturg1319 «*rehant« BuOc Building11 Sotltft Keridlan 6tr*-CIndlan«polia, Indiana 46204

Attention.1 John Kyi aRe i Acc«s« to third .lit*

Our Fil«: B318

Dear Johnt

Thin vill confirn our convarsation this Barning rec/trdingacea«» to th« so c*ll*d third «it« along Finlay Cr«ek. Xouindicated that you.need to nave acc«»« to this slt« in order <ortn« ar«« to bo Initially surveyed in anticipation of poecibl*future remedial vork th«r«.

He have checked wiUi our elien«e and they are willing to grantaccess to your survey taan at tais tino to do such preliminary•urvay worx. v* tru*t th«y vill identify th«nselv«i at the officeco we vill taow who vill be present In this area and whan.

If you have any gueecioru, pl«a»o advise ua and v« vill clearthe cane with our client*.

truly,

Halbert w. Kunz

tans-.vm

redacted erm - creek realignment project plan for the creek realignment project (the...

Documents