realising benefits from ehealth – european strategies and success cases –
DESCRIPTION
Realising benefits from eHealth – European strategies and success cases –. Dr. Karl Stroetmann Communication & Technology Research Bonn, Germany. Bonn - Brussels. Epigraph. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 1
Realising benefits from eHealth
– European strategies and success cases –
Dr. Karl Stroetmann
Communication & Technology ResearchBonn, Germany
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 2
Bonn - Brussels
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 3
"Too many of us spend our time worrying where technology is taking us, instead of working out the right way to go ourselves. We should not try to give computers the job of making our world a better place!“
David Golumbia, The Cultural Logic of Computation, 2009
Epigraph
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 4
Outline
• Health policy context• The promise of eHealth• Europe – a global leader in eHealth
application• European benchmark cases• The Digital Agenda – a European
eHealth vision
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 5
Hard facts facing public health policy makers (in 1970 !)
• “Rising expectations and demands for healthcare
• Rising costs of healthcare, especially hospital care
• Demands for involvement of the consumer
• The acceptability, availability & accessibility of healthcare, including ... a more convenient portal of entry into the system”
Burney, J o School Health, V. 40 (1970), p. 3
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 6
eHealth must be guided by health policy priorities
eHealth cannot be instrumental in defining in what type of future health
system we want to operate,
BUT
once a “better” health system paradigm has been established, eHealth can
deliver much help and support
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 7
What eHealth can do:
• Support and facilitate the realisation of clearly defined health policy and health system (sustainability) goals
• Meet system needs and objectives, not that of individual interest groups (“The Commons” approach)
• Enable new health delivery models and processes
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 8
WHO covereH IMPACT cover
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 9
Europe – a global leader in eHealth application
• General practitioners (GPs) installed patient record systems: – USA: only 20-25% of offices
– Europe/EU:
• 80% have electronic medical data storage
• 66% of all European GPs use them in a patient encounter,
• Various EU Member States (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, UK) have 95% to 99% coverage
Ashish K. Jha et al. (2006) HEALTH AFFAIRS, 11 October 2006 empirica/EC (2008). eHealth Indicators - use of ICT by primary care physicians
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 10
Europe – a global leader in eHealth application
12 EU Member States – as of 2011 about 25 (incl. CH, NO, TR) - cooperate in epSOS (European Patient Smart Open Services) project on cross-border transfer/sharing of
– fully coded patient summary– fully coded ePrescribing data– translated into the respective language across
multiple Member States
Globally, the most ambitious and complex interoperability project ever
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 11
European benchmark cases and success
stories
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 12
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 13
Socio-economic impact of interoperable electronic health record
and ePrescription systems in Europe
www.ehr-impact.eu
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 14
“Small is beautiful”- the Emergency Care Summary
(ECS) system of Scotland -adapted from
Alan HyslopeHealth Strategy, Scottish Government Health
Directorates, Edinburgh, UK
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 15
NHS Scotland
• Separate National Health Service (NHS)
• ca. 5 million patients registered with 1050 general practices – GPs (family doctors)
• All GPs have electronic patient record (EPR), connected to NHS broadband network
• Out-of-hours GP and NHS 24 telephone service
15
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 16
• Allow GPs to keep their offices closed after 17 o’clock
• A “useful summary” was therefore needed for new Out-Of-Hours Services (OOH)
• Also to be used by Accident & Emergency Services (A&E), NHS24 (telephone helpline service), Ambulance Service
• Patient safety = key driver
• Decision to develop Emergency Care Summary, based on extract from GP EPRs
• Simple dataset
• ‘View only’ access by authorised users
Decision in 2001 to implement an ECS
16
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 17
“Small” information content
• Patient identity (address, telephone, CHI number, GP)
• Allergies and adverse reactions to medications
• Medication history
- Repeat prescriptions in past 12 months
- One-off prescriptions in past 30 days
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 18
System Overview
ECSSyste
m
Request & display
NHS 24
A&E
Ambulance
OOH
PracticeServer
GP consultation
Check audit log
HealthBoard
GP Practiceadmin
TBD
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 19
Patient consultation & publicity campaign
• Scottish Consumer Council
• 8 patient focus groups held as part of planning, including people living with HIV and mental health problems
• Letter to all GPs and Practice Managers• Leaflet sent to every household in Scotland,
written by Scottish Consumer Council• Helpline dedicated to enquiries: Opt out,
general enquiries, odd requests• Very few requests to view records• Very few opt outs
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 20
Implementation and progress
• Successful pilot + evaluation in 2004 with 100K records in defined geographical area
• National roll-out 2005/6• Now 99%+ of population
• 1800 patients have opted out (0.03% of all possible)
• Over 4500 registered users
• Use:– over 3.5 million accesses to date– c. 50k per week– steady increase
20
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 21
Benefits from the ECS (I)
Citizens– Patient safety – medication-related in particular– Some avoided admissions & referrals– Time saving for patients
• fewer repeat questions at OOH, NHS24 and A&E– More efficient consultation at NHS 24 – time & satisfaction
Doctors & nurses– Comfort to GPs
• patients are taken care of efficiently out of hours
– No manual writing of medication records – Doctors’ and nurses’ life made easier
21
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 22
Benefits from the ECS (II)
Benefits to NHS Scotland– Reduction in exposure to risk - better clinical governance
• Drugs are recorded correctly and fully
• Advice is based on better information
– Time savings – redeployment of resources:• Fewer repeat questioning about medications by doctors and
nurses at OOH and A&E
• Fewer calls to GPs by A&E pharmacists
• No manual input of medication lists at NHS24 - 1 min per call
– Avoided admissions & visits• Avoided referrals by NHS24 to OOH and A&E
• Faster treatment and some avoided admission at A&E
– no overnight waiting for clarification with GP
22
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 23
ECS – annual socio-economic performance
0
1.000.000
2.000.000
3.000.000
4.000.000
5.000.000
6.000.000
7.000.000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
₤
Present value of total annual costs Present value of annual benefits
23
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 24
ECS – cumulative socio-economic performance
0
5.000.000
10.000.000
15.000.000
20.000.000
25.000.000
30.000.000
35.000.000
40.000.000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
₤
Present value of cumulative costs Present value of cumulative benefits
24
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 25
The integrated health information system of Andalusia, Spain
adapted from
Francisco Perez TorresHead of Information Systems Department
Servicio Andaluz de Salud (SAS)Andalusia, Spain
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 26
26
Healthcare in Andalusia
• Spain: National Health System (universal coverage & free access, publicly
funded by taxes) • Regional responsibility for health
Andalusia since 1984 • 8.3 million population• In 2010 healthcare budget amounts
to 9.80 billion EUR• 100% of primary care (1500 PHCs)
and 72% of specialised care facilities are publicly owned (44 hospitals, 93% of all beds)
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 27
Integrate the healthcare information of every citizen
Diraya´s objective
A SINGLEHEALTHRECORD
A SINGLEHEALTHRECORD
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 28
28
Diraya: integrated healthcare in Andalusia
• Unique health record number for all citizens
• Regional EHR shared between- Primary care- Hospital outpatient specialised care- Hospital-based emergency care- Pharmacies (prescription database)- Hospital inpatient care: under implementation
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 29
KEY
SDiraya’s key elements
A SINGLE Health Record for each citizen1
Unified ACCESS to all services 2
All relevant information STRUCTURED3
Developed by the practitioners/users4
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 30
Diraya Building blocks
HEALTH RECORD
DATA ANALYSIS
Citizens Data Base
Central Booking
Orders / CPOE
Maco Structured Resources
ePrescription RECETA XXI
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 31
31
Diraya facts & figures
• More than 7.5 million EHRs with clinical data
• Connected:– 795 primary healthcare centres (96% of inhabitants)
– 26 hospital organisations
– 3,500 pharmacies
• Users:– Over 17,000 healthcare professionals
– 3,500 pharmacists
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 32
32
Utilisation 2009
• 37.8 million primary care consultation sheets
• 2.7 million hospital emergency care episodes (76%)
• 790,000 hospital outpatient specialised care episodes (103,000 in march-2010: 25%)
• 93 million consultations scheduled through Diraya:
– Primary care: 82 million (5.6 million by internet)
– Specialised care: 11 million
• 70 million electronic prescriptions
• 89 million dispensing procedures
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 33
33
Number of dispensations accordingto type of prescription (2004-2009)
0,18 0,88
6,10
19,46
39,71
50,31
0
20.000.000
40.000.000
60.000.000
80.000.000
100.000.000
120.000.000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
0,00
10,00
20,00
30,00
40,00
50,00
60,00
Recetas manuales Recetas impresas RXXI % Receta XXIManual prescript. Printed prescript.
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 34
Costs and financing of Diraya
• IT costs – 50% of overall costs
• Organisational costs (non-IT costs)– Development, engagement, adaptation
• Total value of socio-economic investment over 12 years:– 245 million EUR
• Financed from the regional budget
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 35
Andalusia: annual socio-economic value of impact to society
0
25.000.000
50.000.000
75.000.000
100.000.000
125.000.000
150.000.000
175.000.000
200.000.000
225.000.000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
EU
R
Present value of total annual costs Present value of annual benefits
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 36
36
Lessons learnt from Diraya• Align the EHR and ePrescribing development with the regional
government’s health strategy– assure that booking and response times are guaranteed– improve clinical management– streamline healthcare processes– rational drug usage … It’s not an IT project
• Alliances - collaborative model: Involve professionals in the inception of the system
– create useful tools for the clinical practice– provide support to the staff (balance usability vs. regulation)– agreement to assure a win-win with the Andalusian Council of
Colleges of Pharmacists and with vendors
• Aim for a sensible balance: adding functionalities vs. improving ICT infrastructure - take risks
• Peer to peer training and support to professionals• Analyse the information in the system & use feedback for
improvement
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 37
eHealth priority and activity fields mentioned in Member State policy documents
preliminary results
Reported eHealth activities Total 2007eH ERA
Total 2010 eH Strategies
DELTA
EHR/Patient summary 27 27 +0
Standards (technical and semantic)
19 25 +6
ePrescription 16 18 +2
Citizen card 22 23 +1
Professional card 7 10 +3
Patient ID 24 26 +2
Professional ID 13 17 +4
Telemedicine 23 27 +4
Evaluation 5 13 +8
Legal Activities 14 18 +4
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 38
The future: A Digital Agenda for Europe (I)
• Continued strong European support for eHealth
solutions
• Just published on 19.05.2010 - COM(2010) 245
• One of seven flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020
strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth
“To exploit the full potential of new eHealth services, the EU needs to remove legal and organisational barriers,
particularly those to pan-European interoperability, and strengthen cooperation among Member States.”
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 39
A Digital Agenda for Europe (II) • Action Line 7 “ICT-enabled benefits for EU society” -
Smart use of technology and exploitation of information to address the challenges facing society like climate change and the ageing population– there sub-objective 7.2. “Sustainable healthcare and
ICT-based support for dignified and independent living”
• Key Action 13: Undertake pilot actions to equip Europeans with secure online access to their medical health data by 2015
• Key Action 14: Propose a recommendation defining a minimum common set of patient data for interoperability of patient records to be accessed or exchanged electronically across Member States by 2012
© Slovakian eHealth Conference, Bratislava, 27th of May, 2010 40
Acknowledgement
We thank the European Commission for financial and non-financial support !This presentation is part of various research supported by the European Commission, Directorate General Information Society and Media, Brussels. It reflects solely the views of its presenters. The European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein