rbm for improved dev results
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Results-Based Management
UNDP Myanmar
23 October 2013
Field Implementation Unit, Pillar 1
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
2
5 key principles
1.Ownership: Developing countries set their own strategies for poverty reduction, improve their institutions and tackle corruption.
2.Alignment: Donor countries align behind these objectives and use local systems.
3.Harmonization: Donor countries coordinate, simplify procedures and share information to avoid duplication.
4.Results: Developing countries and donors shift focus to development results and results get measured.
5.Mutual accountability: Donors and partners are accountable for development results.
The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
Accra Agenda for Action and 2005 Summit Outcome
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
3
Defining results begins with analysis of the country situation, review of the
comparative advantages of the UNCT, a stakeholder analysis and a
vision of desired outcomes
How to Define Results?
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
4
• The essence of causal analysis is the examination of the underlying causes of a condition, problem, or event.
• Most social scientists accept that the concept of causal relations is essential to the understanding of social systems, even though cause and effect, invariably cannot be observed directly.
Causal Analysis
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
5
Role/Pattern Analysis
- Identifies those whose rights have been affected (rights holders) and those who are responsible for ensuring the realisation of those rights (duty bearers)
- Allows to define the valid claims of rights holders and the corresponding obligations of duty bearers.
- Allows to understand the complex web of relations between rights holders and duty bearers at different levels of analysis
rights holders vs. duty bearers
Capacity Analysis
Capacity analysis examines ‘why’ duty bearers lack the capacities to fulfil their obligations as well as ‘why’ rights holders lack the capacities to claim their rights (capacity gap).
Capacity entails different elements, all of which need to be analyzed to identify capacity development needs.
Rights-based results
Consider…
– Whose rights are not being met?
– Who has an obligation to act?
– What do these people need to be able to act? (knowledge, skills, resources)
8
Based on the SWOT exercise results in order to optimizing the supports, building on strengths, addressing weaknesses, capitalizing on opportunities and minimizing threats,
the following comparative advantages…..
focused on maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness
What comparative advantages?
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
9
Stakeholder Analysis Stakeholder importance and influence matrix
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
10
11
Result Based Management
1.Overview of RBM
2. RBM in Planning
3.RBM in Managing
4.RBM in Monitoring
5.RBM in Evaluation
6.RBM in Reporting
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
12
The RBM life-cycle approach
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
13
Part I: Overview of RBM
14
A key component of RBM is performance monitoring which is to objectively measure how well results are being achieved, and to report on measures taken to improve them.
Part I: Overview of RBMWhat is results based management?
RBM is a management approach aimed at ensuringthat activities achieve desired results (outputs, outcomes and impacts)
RBM rests on clearly defined accountability for results
Result = Change
UNDP Asia-Pacific Regional Centre, Management Support Unit
APRC, Management Support Unit - MSU
16
What is a Result ?
A describable or measurable change resulting from
a cause and effect relationship
- UNDG agreed RBM terminology
APRC, Management Support Unit - MSU
1717
Why is it important to choose key results?
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
18
use “change language” rather that the customary ‘action language’.
Change language has three characteristics:
• (a) it describes changes in the conditions/quality of life of people;
• (b) it sets precise criteria for success; and
• (c) it focuses on results,
leaving options on how to achieve them – hence the need to avoid expressions such as “through this and that” or “by doing this and that”.
Results are about Change
(a) expresses would-be results from the providers’ perspective – and usually starts with “to do this or that”;
(b) can be interpreted in may ways because it is not specific or measurable (e.g., “to reduce HIV transmission”); and
(c) focuses only on the completion of activities (e.g., “to open 25 new youth-friendly centers”)
Action language??
APRC, Management Support Unit - MSU
20
The power of measuring results
If you do not measure results, you can not tell success from failure
If you cannot see success, you can not reward it
If you cannot reward success, you are probably rewarding failure
If you can not see success/failure, you can not learn from them
If you can not recognize failure, you can not correct it
If you can demonstrate results, you can win public support
Adapted from Osborne & Gaebler, 1992
Management Support Unit - MSU
21
Why RBM?....intended gains….
Provides crucial information – data/evidence
Provides the status of a project, program, or policy – same data collected over time
Focus on results instead of activities - measurement of programme achievements
Transparency - promotes credibility and public confidence by reporting on the results of programs
RBM MfDR
Result based management Managing for development Results
a broad management strategy aimed at achieving improved performance and demonstrable results
the emphasis on development results rather than organizational results
focused more on internal results and performance of agencies
keep the focus on development changes in the people
Typical pitfalls
Wordy (..and no change language)To promote equitable economic development and
democratic governance in accordance with international norms by strengthening national capacities at all levels and empowering citizens and increasing their participation in decision-making processes
Too ambitiousStrengthened rule of law, equal access to justice and the
promotion of rights
Containing multiple resultsThe state improves its delivery of services and its
protection of rights—with the involvement of civil society and in compliance with its international commitments
Typical pitfalls
Wishy-washy, not a result (ie. Support provided to improve..)Support to institutional capacity building for improved governance
So general, they could mean anythingTo promote sustainable development and increase capacity at municipal level
Overlapping with National goals/ MDGs (impacts) Substantially reduce the level of poverty and income inequality in accordance with the MDGs
Confusing means and endsStrengthen the protection of natural resources through the creation of an enabling environment that promotes sound resources management
Part II: RBM in Planning
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
25
Part II: RBM in Planning
Results chain Developing result matrix Determining the indicators, baseline
and target Assumption and Risk
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
26
Part II: RBM in Planning2.1 The Results Chain
The causal sequence for a development intervention that stipulates the necessary sequence to achieve desired objectives – beginning with inputs, moving through activities and outputs, and culminating in outcomes, impacts and feedback.
In some agencies, reach is part of the results chain. It is based on a theory of change, including underlying assumptions.
Results Chain in RBM
InputsInputs
• Staff time
• Handouts
• Coffee break
Activities
Activities
• Develop a training module
• Deliver the training
• Administer the certification exam
Outputs
Outputs
Judges have
increased knowledge in basic
human rights
instruments
Outcomes
Outcomes
Judicial process
improved
ImpactImpact
More people have
access to justice and are able to exercise
their rights
• Setting clear results to be achieved
• Cause-effect relationship throughout the results chain
Planned Results
If............, then…….
UNDP Asia-Pacific Regional Centre, Management Support Unit
BEFO
RE
AFTER
Result Matrix with outcome and output levels
National development priorities or goalsIndicators, baseline, targets MoV Risks and
AssumptionsResponsible
personsIndicative resources
Outcome 1
Output 1.1
Output 1.2
Outcome 2
Output 2.1
Output 2.2
What is an indicator?
A tool / variable to measure evidence of progress towards a result or that a result has been achieved
Result Matrix
Indicators
Indicators describe how the intended results will be measured - accountability
Objectively verifiable, repeatable measures of a particular condition
Must be accompanied by baselines and targets
Management Support Unit - MSU
32
Assumption: A Definition
A necessary condition for the achievement of results at different levels.
Part of the cause-effect logic
Stated as though it is actually the case
Less probable at the higher level of the hierarchy
Management Support Unit - MSU
33
Risk: A Definition
A potential event or occurrence beyond the control of the programme/project that could adversely affect the achievement of the desired results
A threat to success not just the negative of an assumption; a trigger for reconsideration of strategic direction
Risk assessments should consider a wide range of potential risks, including strategic, environmental, financial, operational, organizational, political and regulatory risks
Risk mitigation strategies: prevention; reduction; transference; contingency plan; acceptance
APRC, Management Support Unit - MSU
34
then
Assumptions and Risks
There is good distribution system
Unable to comply with international food regulations
if
then
and if
and ifif
Increased standards of living
among fishing communities
Increased standards of living
among fishing communities
Family & company incomes increase from previous year
Family & company incomes increase from previous year
65 tons of fish caught each day
Rate of fishing is sustainable
Inflation reduces value of income
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
35
Part III. RBM in Managing
Part III. RBM in Managing
Managing effectively for results requires flexibility to change your strategies and activities to better achieve the results better
using a team-based approach to ensure that all stakeholders agree with any proposed changes or actions
Results matrices can be updated once a year with agreement of all stakeholders
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
36
Part III. RBM in Managing
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
37
Key Challenges to RBM Strategies to Overcome Them
Defining realistic results Results should be commensurate with your resources and reach
Ensuring a cause and effect relationship and coherence between output, outcome and the goal
Be realistic with the definition of results so that outputs and outcomes can be realistically achieved.
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
38
Part IV. RBM in Monitoring
Part IV. RBM in Monitoring
A single, coherent Results Framework and a operational M&E Plan, embedded within a National System for M&E are ideal for promoting coherence and national ownership
Key Monitoring Tools
The Results Matrix (discussed in previous section) The M&E plan
Provides opportunity to:
- Track progress in the achievement of results;- Know whether the original strategies are still appropriate- Make necessary adjustments to resources, both human and/or financial
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
39
M & E Plan in M&E Components
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
40
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
41
Part V. RBM in Evaluation
External and Independent – free of conflict of interest Impartial – removing bias 3 key functions:
• Utilization – as an input to provide decision-makers with knowledge and evidence about performance and good practices;
• Accountability – to donors, stakeholders and general public• Contribution – to institutional policymaking, development
effectiveness and organizational effectiveness A key tool used in planning an evaluation is
• to review results achieved to data, • five other variables: relevance, efficiency effectiveness, impact and
sustainability
Management Support Unit - MSU
42
Part V. RBM in Evaluation
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
43
Part VI. RBM in Reporting
results-based reporting shifts attention away from activities
to results at output and outcome levels
results matrix (important aid) articulates the results at the
output and outcome level and the indicators, baselines and
targets - along with the review of indicators, assumptions and
risks
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
44
Part VI. RBM in Reporting
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
45
In writing the results story, you will need to consider:
1.achieved & indicators of success
2.actual results compare to expected results
3.illuminating findings with quotes, testimonials, photos, etc.
4.reasons for over or under achievement
5.involvement of others (partners, stakeholders, beneficiaries) and degree of attribution, if possible..
Part VI. RBM in Reporting (contd.)
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
46
Part VI. RBM in Reporting (contd.)
An effective report can also be one that highlights areas of inefficiency and poor results, etc.
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
47
Part VI. RBM in Reporting (contd.)
Quality criteria for results reporting, when reviewed and rated, include:
1.completeness;
2.balance (good and bad);
3.consistency(between sections);
4.substantiveness and reliability;
5.clarity. (include ‘source’)
The Secretary-General wants everyone to support a united UN system.
“The true measure of success for the United Nations is not how much we promise but how much we deliver for those who need us most”.
Thank You
October 2010 Management Support Unit - MSU
49
UNDP Gov IPs