rapid tissue tests as indicators of yield, plant composition, and soil fertility for corn and...
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]On: 22 May 2013, At: 00:26Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Communications in Soil Science andPlant AnalysisPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lcss20
Rapid tissue tests as indicators ofyield, plant composition, and soilfertility for corn and soybeansP. W. Syltie a , S. W. Melsted a & W. M. Walker aa University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign, Urbana, Illinois,61801Published online: 11 Nov 2008.
To cite this article: P. W. Syltie , S. W. Melsted & W. M. Walker (1972): Rapid tissue tests asindicators of yield, plant composition, and soil fertility for corn and soybeans, Communicationsin Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 3:1, 37-49
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103627209366348
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make anyrepresentation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. Theaccuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independentlyverified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions,claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever causedarising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of thismaterial.
COMM. IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 3(l) 37-^9 (1972)
RAPID TISSUE TESTS AS INDICATORS OF YIELD, PLANTCOMPOSITION, AND SOIL FERTILITY FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS
KEY WORDS: Simple correlation analysis, cross-nutrient relationships,critical sap concentration.
P. W. Syltie, S. W. Melsted, and W. M. Walker
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana, Illinois 61801
ABSTRACT
Corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) rapid tissue
test data for N, P, K, Mg, and Mn were obtained at two locations from
experimental plots receiving varying rates and combinations of N, P, and
K. Soil test, plant composition, and yield data for each plot were also
obtained. Relatively precise tissue test readings were obtained by using
color standard sheets. A simple correlation matrix was used to relate
specific pairs of variables for corn and soybean data at both locations.
The correlation analysis of five rapid tissue tests with plant
composition, fertility, and yield levels for corn and soybeans revealed
several significant positive nutrient-same nutrient, and many negative
cross-nutrient relationships. Most negative correlations could be
explained by ionic antagonism effects. The K tissue test proved to be the
most applicable for both crops. Critical sap nutrient concentrations were
established for four nutrients, in the case of K through the use of
critical plant composition values.
INTRODUCTION
Rapid tissue tests, or sap analyses, have as their objective the
determination of a nutrient stress in a plant in the region where
deficiency symptoms are not visible but where a decrease in yield, or
37Copyright ® 1972 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. NO PART of this work may be reproduced or utilized in anyform or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including xerography, photocopying, microfilm, and re-cording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the publisher.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
SYLTIE, MELSTED, AND WALKER
growth, may occur. This is often referred to as "hidden hunger" in
crops. The value of rapid tissue tests lies in the detection of mild
nutrient stresses, distinguishing between disease and nutrient disorders,
and supplying this information in the field while other grox.'th factors
are being observed and evaluated.
The tests are designed, where possible, in such a way that negative
results indicate a nutrient stress in the plant. This is true for
nitrate, Mg and Mn tests where these elements essentially disappear from
the plant sap with the onset of a deficiency stress. Positive tests,
therefore, only indicate degrees of luxury consumption, while negative
tests do not reflect the severity of the deficiency. For P and K, both
immobile nutrients in soil, nutrient stress can occur in the plant before
these elements disappear from the sap. As a result, the P and K tissue
tests may indicate the degree of deficiency stress, if low, and the degree
of luxury consumption if very high.
Considerable research effort was expended in the area of rapid
chemical tissue testing during the mid-1920's to the early 1950's.
During this period a host of workers including Hof fer1 , Morgan2 , Emmert3 ,
Thornton, Conner and Fraser4, Bray6, and Melsted6, to mention a few,
developed several methods for determining a plant's nutritional status on
the basis of its sap nutrient concentration.
Rapid tissue tests are based on colorimetric methods for the estimation
of a particular nutrient level in the sap as measured against a prepared set
of color standards. Lynd and Turk7 utilized permanent plastic standards,
but more recent work, including this study, has employed color paper
standards. Precision is influenced to some extent by visual limitations
in detecting color changes.
Acceptance of tissue tests by agronomists has been rather slow,
due mainly to lack of understanding of the tests and their quantitative
38
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
TISSUE TESTS AS INDICATORS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS
precision. Perhaps another reason for slow acceptance is the scarcity
of detailed studies showing how well one or more of the rapid tissue
tests for particular plant nutrients indicates respective plant composi-
tion, soil fertility, or yield levels. Only generalized studies regarding
these relationships have been made, including those of Lynd and Turk7,
Lynd, Turk and Cook8, Shear9, Yuen and Pollard10, and Melsted6.
The objective of this study was to utilize N, P, K, Mg, and Mn
chemical tissue tests from corn and soybean samples, and (a) determine
its relationship to plant composition, soil fertility, and yield data
for the same nutrient, (b) to establish critical sap nutrient concentra-
tions when possible, and (c) examine some "cross-nutrient" relationships.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Corn and soybean yield, tissue test, and leaf composition data
were obtained from 102 experimental plots at the Brownstown and Toledo
Experiment Fields in 1968 in south central Illinois. At early tassel,
when silk was just beginning to appear, corn leaf samples (the leaf oppo-
site and below the ear) were gathered from six randomly selected plants
from plots receiving fertilizer rates ranging from 0 to 269, 0 to 58,
and 0 to 141 kg/ha of N, P, and K, respectively. Six soybean plants
per plot were sampled at Toledo when they were in the early pod stage,
utilizing the youngest mature leaf and its petiole below the crown. Soil
test data for P, K, and pH were determined by modified Bray Pj/and P2
methods11, the cobaltinitrite K method12, and the glass electrode pH
meter13, respectively. At maturity corn was harvested from each
plot and adjusted to 15.5% moisture. Individual plots were about 10 m
wide and 20 m long with rows 76 cm apart. Primary soil types at both
locations were in the Hoyleton-Cisne-Huey Association. Plant populations
for corn averaged about 56,000 plants per hectare.
39
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
SYLTIE, MELSTED, AND WALKER
All leaf samples were washed and dried a short time in the field.
Three leaves from each plot were bagged, oven dried and ground, prior to
laboratory analysis. Nitrogen was determined by standard Kjeldahl
procedures and P, K, Mg and Mn were analyzed on ashed samples using
emission spectroscopy.
Tissue Testing Methods. Sap concentrations for nitrate-N, P, K, Mg and
Mn were determined using the rapid tissue tests on each of three leaves
from each plot and the values averaged. Standard color charts were
used to obtain readings as precise as possible. Standard solutions used
in preparation of the color charts were adjusted to the range of nutrient
concentrations known to be present within the corn and soybean sap. For
the K and Mg tests the actual reagents were used, while for N, P and Mn
pencil colored paper strips that matched the actual colors of the standard
were used since these reagent colors were not stable13.
For each test sap was expressed onto a filter paper test strip or
nitrate powder by squeezing the corn leaf midrib, or the base of a soybean
petiole, with a pliers to wet the reagent. Additional reagents, if
required, were applied and developed color was compared to the appro-
priate color standard.
Nitrate-N. The reagent of Nelson, Kurtz, and Bray14 was employed. One
hundred grams of dry BaS04, 10 g of M11SO4.H2O, 2 g of finely powdered
Zn (to reduce nitrate to nitrite), 75 g of citric acid, 4 g of sulfanilic
acid, and 2 g of ry-napthy lamine were finely ground as separate portions
with a pestle and mortar, then thoroughly mixed and stored in a blackened
container. Any degree of red color produced on reaction with plant sap
indicated the presence of nitrates.
Phosphorus. A Mo-blue reaction similar to that employed for color-
imetrically measuring P in the Bray P^ and P2 tests was used to measure
sap P5 . Ten g of ammonium molybdate were dissolved in 85 ml of HoO to
ko
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
TISSUE TESTS AS INDICATORS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS
produce solution A. Solution B was composed of a cold solution of 16 ml
of H2O in 170 ml of concentrated HC1. Finally, solutions A and B were
mixed, and 2 g of boric acid (reagent grade) per 50 ml of solution were
added. A portion of this final solution was diluted 10 times for the test
reagent. A freshly-prepared dilute SnCl2»2H20 solution was used to reduce
the sap spot on the filter paper strip.
Potassium. Melsted's spot test6 method was utilized to determine sap K.
Solution A contained 0.6 g of dipicrylamine (2,2', 4,4', 6,6'-hexanitro-
diphenylamine) and 0.6 g of Na2CO3 boiled in 25 ml of H2O. Solution B was
prepared by diluting 8 ml of A to 25 ml with H2O, and solution C by diluting
10 ml of B to 15 ml with H2O. Three 8 mm diameter spots, one from each
solution A, B, and C were placed along a filter paper strip and dried.
The spots, when treated with plant sap and 0.5 N HCl, were sensitive
to K concentrations of approximately 750 ppm to 3000 ppm and were inter-
polated to as low as 600 ppm and as high as 4000 ppm K with standards.
Magnesium. Cheng and Bray's spot method16 was used to determine sap Mg.
A mixture of 0.15 g of F241 (l-hydroxy-2-naphthylazo)-5-2-naphthol-4-sulfonic
acid) and 0.5 g of sodium borate was finely ground with a pestle and mortar
and dissolved in 25 ml of hot methanol. Complexing solution A was prepared
by dissolving 10 g of potassium oxalate, 0.1 g of sodium borate, and 0.05 g
of NaHCOß in 50 ml of H2O. Complexing solution B contained 10 ml of A in
20 ml of H2O. Three 8 mm spots of the F241 solution were placed along a
filter paper strip and dried. Then a small amount of each complexing
solution was placed over separate F241 spots to produce sensitivities of
from approximately 10 to 100 ppm Mg. A saturated sodium borate solution
was used to buffer sap acidity.
Manganese. Feigl's tetrabase determination16 for Mn was utilized to
determine sap Mn. Reagent I was prepared by dissolving 2 g of K0H and 5 g
of KIO4 in 100 ml of H20. Reagent II contained 0.8 g of NaOH, 0.25 g of
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
SYLTIE, MELSTED, AND WALKER
p,p'-methylenebis(N,N-dimethylaniline), and 20 ml of glacial acetic acid in
80 ml of H2O. A drop of reagent I was applied to sap expressed on a filter
paper strip, followed 30 seconds later by a drop of reagent II to give a
blue color in the presence of Mn.
STATISTICAL METHODS
Simple correlation techniques were used for analyzing data. Coefficients
of variability for each tissue test were also calculated from the three
individual plant analyses with 20 randomly selected plots. Each tissue
test was correlated with plant composition, soil fertility, and yield data,
using specific variables of agronomic interest. The correlation analysis
was performed over both Toledo and Brownstown corn, and over Toledo soybeans.
A limitation in the data analysis was the necessity for fixing absolute
values to tissue test readings at either extreme of a specific test's
range of values, e.g. negative values and those above the highest standard.
Also, there may be some question whether it was appropriate to correlate
the nitrate tissue test, a positive or negative indicator of nitrate with
other variables of interest. Recognizing limitations, correlations of sap
nitrate are presented in this report.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Coefficients of variability (CVs) for tissue test values from the
three leaves selected per plot indicated variability among individual
plants under uniform growing conditions. "-rage CVs and 20 randomly
selected corn and soybean plots were 40%, .„, 10%, 23%, and 37% for the N,
P, K, Mg, and Mn tissue tests, respectively. Sap concentrations of Mn, .,
and Mg were found to be higher, on the average, for corn than for soybeans.
Concentrations of Mn were 10 to 50 or more times higher in corn than
soybeans. Soybean sap P concentrations were usually higher and more uniform
than for corn, while K concentrations varied little between the two plant
species. Some representative sap concentrations are shown in Table 1.
1*2
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
TISSUE TESTS AS INDICATORS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS
Table 1. Sap concentrations of N, P, K, Mg, and Mn for five corn and fivesoybean plots at Toledo, Illinois.
Treatment
N
13567269135202
00000
kg/ha
P
2915292915
2915292915
K
743774037
743774037
N
15712155
0.32.02.02.00.7
P
2881110012
100100100100100
Sap concentrations.
K
Corn
360011004000600
2000
Soybeans
20001800200014001900
ppm
Mg
20002000130020001200
800100060013001500
Mn
321583318
0.10.10.21.30.1
Table 2 displays selected correlation coefficients between tissue
test, plant composition and soil fertility data for the same nutrient, and
between tissue test and yield. Several correlations were significant at
the 1% probability level, while a lesser number were significant at the 5%
probability level. The nitrate tissue test correlated very well with both
plant composition (Figure 1 C) and fertilizer N for corn, but not for
soybeans. This might be expected since the soybean, a symbiotic N fixer,
supplies most of its own N. Phosphorus tissue tests correlate very well
with plant composition for corn (Figure 1 D), although soil test P levels
show only slight relationships with tissue test values in both corn and
soybeans. Soybean P fertilization levels were highly correlated with
the P tissue test. Potassium tissue tests correlate very well across all
but one parameter for corn and soybeans, indicating this tissue test to
be the most quantitatively precise of the five studied. Only soybean
«*3
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
SYLTIE, MELSTED, AND WALKER
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between t issue t e s t values and plantcomposition, s o i l , t e s t , f e r t i l i z e r , and yield values for thesame nutr ient for corn and soybeans+
Factors Brownstown Toledo ToledoCorrelatedT Corn Corn Soybeans
N t t vs N 0.447**N c t vs N 0.478**P t t vs P 0.423**P t t vs P 0.273*P t t vs P 0.082P t t vs P 0.155
K t t vs K 0.857*K t t vs K 0.625**K,.,. vs K 0.829**Mgtt vs Mg 0.037Mntt vs Mn 0.957**
N t t vs Yld 0.020P t t vs Yld -0.571**K t t vs Yld 0.316*Mgtt vs Yld -0.223Mntt vs Yld -0.337*
* * P50.01 * O.OKPS0.05 +A dash indicates no correla t ion coefficientvas obtained. TSublet ters mean the following: t t= t i s sue t e s t ; pc=plantcomposition; st=soil test; f=fertilizer treatment; P^ = soil P test(adsorbedP); P2 = soil P test (adsorbed + acid-soluble P); Yld » yield.
soil test K values were not significantly correlated with K tissue tests.
The Mg tissue test showed no significant correlations with total Mg in
the leaf for either corn or soybeans. Corn leaf Mn tissue tests, however,
showed a very good relationship to total Mn in the leaf, but this correla-
tion was not significant in soybeans. This was probably due to the wider
range in soil pH on the corn plots, and thus a wide range in Mn
solubility levels. T he much lower Mn values and narrow range in the soy-
beans also may have tended to obscure the correlation.
Several highly significant tissue test-yield relationships were
observed (Table 2). For corn, the P and Mn tissue tests showed
0.426*0.490*0.628**0.1450.0260.121
0.937**0.904**0.904**0.3650.668**
0.0020.425*0.723**0.2980.485*
0.223
0.2970.373
-0.472*0.616**
0.625**0.3990.783**0.349
-0.088
-0.579**0.4020.728**
-0.206*-0.293
hk
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
TISSUE TESTS AS INDICATORS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS
ccO.B-I
R - 0.937T - 0.33 • O.O0OM9X
0.0looo eooo 300O qooo
TISSUE TEST K. PPM IN SOP
R - 0.147Y - 2.14 • 0.OIJ6X
TISSUE TEST N. PPM IN SflP
2?.5
ena
ccl.O-
0.5.1000
R - 0.625Y - 0.218 « 0.0O086X
0.5
°-0.3ut
CO
>-
<x
1300 1600 1900 2200
TISSUE TEST K. PPM IN SRP
R - 0.122Y - 0.23 « 0.00065X
20 40 SO 80TISSUE TEST P. PPM IN SfiP
F I G . 1
significant negative correlations with yield. Similarly, soybeans
displayed negative yield relationships with sap N and Mg levels, but not
with P and Mn. Only K tissue test values showed positive significant
correlations with yield for both crops. The value of the N, P, and K
tissue tests as related to plant composition, fertility, and yield data
for the same nutrient is summarized in Table 3.
—itoo
«»5
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
SYLTIE, MELSTED, AND WALKER
Table 3. Summary of the value of tissue tests for corn and soybeans asdeterminants of plant composition, soil fertility, and yieldlevels for the same nutrient*
Plant compositionSoil fertilityYield
Plant compositionSoil fertilityYield
Nitrate
ExcellentGoodN. S.
N. S.N. S,GoodT
Tissue Test
Phosphorus
Corn
ExcellentPoorExcellent"1"
Soybeans
N. S.GoodPoor
Potassium
ExcellentExcellentExcellent
ExcellentGoodExcellent
*Descriptive terms have the following meanings: Excellent = all correlationcoefficients are highly significant; Good •= most correlation coefficientsare highly significant; Poor = only one correlation coefficient is signifi-cant. +This P-Yield correlation is negative, though considered to be anexceptional case. £such a correlation has little or no value for soybeans.
Tentative critical sap nutrient concentrations were established for N,
P, K, and Mn. For certain nutrients, such as N, P, and Mn, any amount of
detectable nutrient in the sap has been shown to be sufficient for normal
plant growth17. This study supports these N, P, and Mn critical levels,
since yields for corn and soybeans were usually seriously reduced only when
one or more of these tissue tests was negative. Figure 1 C illustrates how
tissue test values below a plant composition value of about 2.3% N, near
Melsted, Motto and Peck's18 critical corn leaf composition level of 3.07. N,
were' all negative, indicating plant stress. For nutrients such as K and Mg,
however, sap nutrient deficiency concentrations can be more precisely
determined within the tissue test's range. Critical K sap concentrations
.were determined by using Melsted's et al18 critical plant composition levels
of 1.90% (corn) and 2.20% (soybeans). Extension of these plant composition
values to curves of Figures 1 A, and 1 B, corresponding critical tissue test
1*6
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
TISSUE TESTS AS INDICATORS FOR CORK AND SOYBEANS
values of about 3000 ppm (corn) and 2000 ppm (soybeans) were obtained. The
soybean critical value agrees with Melsted's value6, but the corn critical
value is 1000 ppm above his estimation. Critical Mg sap concentrations
could not be determined since Mg plant composition and tissue test values
were not significantly correlated. This was probably due to a narrow range
of Mg tissue and composition values caused primarily by a lack of Mg-
deficient plants at the two locations.
Some highly significant "cross-nutrient" relationships between tissue
test results and plant composition and fertility levels are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Highly significant "cross-nutrient" relationships between tissuetest results and plant composition or soil fertility levels forToledo and Brownstown soybeans.
FactorsCorrelated* Corn Soybeans
N t t vs P p c
N t t vs MgpcPtt vs Mgpc
Ntt vs Ktt
Ntt vs Kpc
Ntt vs KfPtt vs Npc 0.441+Ptt vs Nf 0.481+
Ptt vs Ktt 0.614Ptt vs Kpc 0.684Ptt vs Kf 0.577Ktt vs Ppc 0.559Ktt vs Mgpc ' 0.867 0.660Ktt vs Mn p c 0.667Mgtt vs P2 0.612Mntt vs NpC 0.659Mntt vs Kst 0.592+Mntt vs pH s t 0.560+
*Subletters mean the following: tt = tissue test; pc = plant composition;st » soil test; f = fertilizer treatment; P2 "».soll.P test (adsorbed +acid-soluble P). "Trom Brownstown corn.
1*7
Positive
0.408
0.807
Negative
correlations
correlations
0.576
0.5400.7100.514
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
SYLTIE, MELSTED, AND WALKER
Most of these correlations vere negative, supporting the contention of
Cook et al. 9 and Russell30 that as the concentrations of certain ionic
species increases, the concentration of other ions will decrease within
both plant tissue and sap (ion antagonism). Various other biological
interactions are also known to be operative that may cause these negative
tissue test-plant composition and fertility correlations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by the University of Illinois Agricultural
Experiment Station, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana,
Illinois.
REFERENCES
1. Hoffer, G. N. Purdue U. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 298. 1930.
2. Morgan, F. M. Connecticut Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 372. 1935.
3. Emmert, E. M. Kentucky Agr. Exp. Sta. Cir. 43. 1934.
4. Thornton, S. F., S. D. Connor, and R. R. Fraser. Purdue U. Agr. Exp.Sta. Cir. 204. 1945.
5. Bray R. H. Soil Sci. 60: 219-221. 1945.
6. Melsted, S. W. Better Crops with Plant Food 34 (1): 26, 42-45. 1950.
7. Lynd, J. Q., and L. M. Turk. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 40: 940-941.1948.
8. Lynd, J. Q., L. M. Turk, and R. L. Cook. Agron. Jour. 42: 402-407.1950.
9. Shear, G. M. Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bul. 84. 1943.
10. Yuen, S. H., and A. G. Pollard. Jour. Sei. Food Agr. 2: 537-542.1951.
11. Laverty, J. C. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27: 360-361. 1963.
12. Jackson, M. L. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. EnglewoodCliffs, N. H. 498 p. 1958.
13. Syltie, P. W. Correlation studies of rapid tissue tests with yield andplant and soil analyses. M. S. Thesis, Department of Agronomy,University of Illinois, Urbana, 61801. 1971.
48
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3
TISSUE TESTS AS INDICATORS FOR CORN AND SOYBEANS
14. Nelson, J.L., L. T. Kurtz, and R. H. Bray. Anal. Chem. 26: 1081-1082.1954.
15. Cheng, K. L., and R. H. Bray. Soil Sci. 72: 449-458. 1951.
16. Feigl, Fritz. Spot tests in inorganic analysis. Elsevier Pub. Co.New York. 1967.
17. Melsted, S. W. Unpublished data.
18. Melsted, S. W., H. L. Motto, and T. R. Peck. Agron. Jour. 61: 17-20.1969.
19. Cook, R. L., L. S. Robertson, K. Lawton, and P. J. Rood. Soil Sci. Soc.Am. Proc. 12: 279-381. 1948.
20. Russell, R. W. Soil conditions and plant growth, 7th Ed. Interscience,New York. 1966.
^9
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f Il
linoi
s at
Urb
ana-
Cha
mpa
ign]
at 0
0:26
22
May
201
3