r. m. wagner: agn observations with magic – p.1 r. m. w agner max-planck-institut für physik,...
TRANSCRIPT
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.1
R. M. WAGNERMax-Planck-Institut für Physik, München
on behalf of the MAGIC COLLABORATION
AGN Observations in the GeV/TeV Energy Range
with the MAGIC Telescope
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.2
Contents
Blazars & jets – how can TeV observations help?
MAGIC blazar observation activitiesBlazars observed by MAGIC, some highlights
• Markarian 421• 1ES 1959+650• 1ES 1218+304• PG 1553+113• Markarian 501• Markarian 180• 1ES 2344+514• BL Lacertae
Conclusions
16 sources (incl M87) to date and counting
seen in VHE -rays
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.3
Jets observed under small angle• Rapid variability at all wavelengths• Most violent and rapid often in VHE• High Doppler factors: amplified
emission, deep insight into jet
Kino et al.
synchrotronpeak
Inverse Compton
peak
(Buckley 1999)
Hadronic
TeV Blazars | E>100 GeV
Mkn 501 HEGRA, Kranich 2001
How can TeV observations help? -rays are crucial messengers:• Dynamics of emission regions in the jets• Study acceleration & energy loss timescales • Decide: leptonic vs hadronic acceleration?
- Hadronic models challenged by observed X/VHE correlations and by very rapid -ray variability
- Variability needs to be explained: Matter crossing the jet? sub-shocks? ...jet structure
• Decide SSC/EIC
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.4
The MAGIC Telescope
• 17m Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescope: currently largest single-dish instrument
• 3.5° FOV
Optimized for extragalactic point-like sources
• Trigger threshold: 50 – 60 GeV Analysis thresh: 70 – 100GeV
• Energy resolution 30% at 150 GeV
• Sensitivity: 2.5% Crab Nebula in 50 hours at E=250 GeV
• Enhanced duty cycle (moon observations)
• 2nd telescope under construction
Major Atmospheric Gamma-ray Imaging Cherenkov Telescope
Extensive blazar observation program: approx. 500 hours/year
Simultaneous optical monitoring during observations MWL campaigns with Suzaku and other satellite experiments (results: see ICRC’07)
Numerous ToO agreements with optical; X-ray, -ray satellites; telescopes, and
Global Network of Cherenkov Telescopes initiative
simultaneous observations w/HESS: wider energy coverage
sequential observations w/VERITAS: ext’d time coverage
Ongoing blazar monitoring of known bright sources: low state, flare statistics, blazar duty cycle
MAGIC | AGN & blazar observation activities
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.5
Mkn 421 | z=0.030 | Nov 2004 - Apr 2005
• 25.6 h observations, clear diurnal signal
• Energy threshold: 150 GeV• Source-inherent cutoff 1.40.3 TeV
ApJ 663 in press
astro-ph/0603478
historical
TeV spectra
MAGIC
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.6
Mkn 421 | z=0.030 | Nov 2004 - Apr 2005
• Variable fluxes on day-to-day scale, 0.5–2 Crab, but no flares shorter than 1h
ApJ 663 in press
astro-ph/0603478
F(E>200GeV)
2-10 keV
optical
Intra-night, 10 min bins:
6 nights, night-by-night
• Clear TeV/X-ray correlation,slope hardens with intensity: IC favored
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.7
Mkn 501 | z=0.034 | June/July 2005ApJ submitted
astro-ph/0702008
• Clear signal each night: > 85 • Energy threshold 150 GeV• No strong evidence for correlated optical/X/VHE emission
June 30 July 09Clear variability in -rays
<F>Mkn501 ~ 0.5 Crab (‘low’)
Unprecedented
fast variations!
(<3 min)Emission region
severely constrained!June 30 July 09
<F>Mkn 501
2 min bins 2 min bins
Obs during moontime!
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.8
Mkn 501 | Intra-night flaresApJ submitted
astro-ph/0702008
• Two flares behave rather differently• June 30 flare: No high (>600 GeV) energies• July 09: all energies, “pre-flare“?
June 30 July 09
150-250 GeV
250-600 GeV
600-1200 GeV
1200 GeVand above
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.9
Constant fit : 2/ndf = 76.6/25 (P=4×10-7)
Spectrum hardens with increasing flux
Peak Peak
Peak in VHE distribution clearly observed in high-flux nights
Peak location seems to depend on the source luminosity
Mkn 501 | Spectral variations
EBL corrected EBL corrected(Kneiske et al. 2004 “low IR”)
(Kneiske et al. 2004 “low IR”)
measured
measured
ApJ submitted
astro-ph/0702008
Flux-Spectral index correlation
SED
MAGIC
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.10
1ES 2344+514 | z=0.044 | Aug 2005 – Dec 2005ApJ 663 in press
astro-ph/0612383
First time-resolved observation of the low blazar emission state
Energy spectrum• Discovery: Whipple, Flare Dec 1995, F(>350GeV) = 63% Crab Catanese et al. 1997
• UL from Whipple (1997, 2000), HEGRA (1998-2002), TACTIC (2004-2005)
• MAGIC: observation Aug-Dec 2005 F(>350GeV)=6% Crab
• 11 - Clear detection
• Only marginal hints of variability
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.11
PG 1553+113 | z>0.09 ApJL 654 (2007) 119
Blazar at unknown distance• No emission lines: Jet outshines core? Very close alignment of jet axis to observer?• High z? Small host galaxy? • Discovery by H.E.S.S. & MAGIC• Steepest observed –ray spectrum: spectral slope =4.2±0.3 – how much absorption is intrinsic?
MAGIC VHE
KVA optical
2005
2005
2006
2006
SSC modeling:• Models based on different z: Disfavor z>0.56 on 4.5 level
• Light curve: No correlation with optical flare. Time lag?
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.12
BL Lacertae | z=0.069 | Aug – Dec 2005
LBL-type blazar: Synchrotron peak in the optical:Expect steep slope at VHE profit from low energy threshold!
First LBL discovered in VHE –rays!
Relatively steep –ray spectrum: spectral slope =3.6±0.5
ApJL submitted
astro-ph/0703084
Leptonic model, no EIC components necessary as required to explain 1997 flare seen by EGRET
Epeak=250 GeV216 Excess eventsSignificance: 5.1
Sky map
Ravasio et al. 2002
O/VHE correlation?
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.13
Summary & Conclusions• There are now 16 blazars observed in -rays above 100 GeV with more
observations & detections in the pipeline • VHE observations are crucial for modeling non-thermal emission
regions in jets, but...• Will need full time-dependent modeling & MWL observations• Increased instrumental sensitivity helps precision observations
of bright blazars Mkn 421, Mkn 501, 1ES 2344.
• Leptonic nature of acceleration?flux-hardness correlation, IC peak detected
• Fast blazar flaring: First time minute-scale variability in VHE!• Low blazar emission state was mostly elusive before:
• now removing observational bias towards flaring sources in the VHE regime
1) Many new sources discovered with interesting properties:• Mkn 180: source detected upon optical trigger • 1ES 1218: high redshift (now confirmed by VERITAS)• PG 1553: probably very close alignment to jet axis• BL Lacertæ: First LBL -ray source
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.14
Backup slides
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.15
Detection of E>100 GeV -rays
showers
• Narrow images
• Aligned towards source direction
, 100 GeV Proton, 100 GeV• Cosmic rays initiate extensive air showers
• Cherenkov light is emitted by relativistic particles in the shower
• Showers induced by -rays and hadronic cosmic rays (104 times more numerous) develop differently in the atmosphere
• Image parametrization
• Background suppression: Cuts in image parameters
candidate eventsfrom pointing direction
hadronic showers
• Spread images
• Isotropic arrival direction
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.16
Kino et al.
synchrotronpeak
Typical Spectral Energy Distribution
Inverse Comptonpeak
(Buckley 1999)
• Inverse Compton scattering on different possible target photon fields
• In particular in blazars: Synchrotron Self-Compton model: synchrotron photons target field for IC process
• Natural explanation of X-ray / -ray correlated variability
Acceleration and VHE productionPrimary acceleration by diffusive shock acceleration in jetsPower law
• Electrons emit synchrotron radiation
Electron
Electron
• Protons: 0 decay from photo-pion production or synchrotron emission from protons
• Difficult to accomodate X-ray / -ray correlations
• Should observe simultaneous -emission
Hadronic acceleration models:
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.17
Low-level blazar emission
1ES 2344+514 Discovery: Flare during the night of 1995/12/21
• Up to now VHE -ray observations biased towards flaring states: • What are the properties of blazars at non-flare times?
• MAGIC: Clear 11 signal from 23 observation nights
MAGIC 2005VHE -ray light curve
• and with previous <5observations
• Profit from MAGIC’s higher sensitivity
• Integral flux 5.7 times lower than during 1995 flare
• Light curve well compatible with low emisson state of the source
All-time VHE -ray light curve
1995 flare
MAGICsignificance well below 5
1995 flare data & 2005 MAGIC low emission data could be modeled using a one-zone SSC model.
ApJ in press
astro-ph/0612383
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.18
PG 1553 probablydistant source!
Possibility to constrain redshift by assumptions on EBL and acceleration mechanism:
z < 0.42 (Mazin & Goebel 2007)Once distance is known: Source probably
decisive for EBL determination!
Attenuation of VHE -rays in the universePG 1553+113 blazar with unknown distance• Simultaneous discovery by MAGIC, H.E.S.S. • MAGIC: 8.8 signal from 19 h observations• Steepest observed –ray spectrum:
spectral slope =4.20.3
MAGICH.E.S.S.
Crab nebula
Modification of spectrum due to Extragalactic Background Light (EBL)
VHE + EBL e+e–
VHE is “lost” to observer
IR(dust)
Vis(starlight)
Peak in e+e– GeV energies probe a specific energy range of the EBL spectrum
Net effect in the >100 GeV range: Steepening of (power-law) spectra
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.19
Mkn 180 | z=0.045 | 2006 March 23-31
New sources discovered by IACT:
Mkn 180• Successful optical trigger• 11.1 h, 5.5 ,
F(>200GeV) = 11% Crab,
spectral slope =3.3 ± 0.7rather hard spectrum
• Earlier UL at comparable level• No significant variability• Need to understand whether
O/VHE correlation
ApJL 648 (2006) 105
SEDModel: FO98
Model: CG02
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.20
1ES1218+304 | z=0.182
• Whipple: F(>350GeV)<8% C.U.
• HEGRA: F(>750GeV)<12% C.U.
• MAGIC: DISCOVERY!
• Jan 2005, 8.2 h
• 6.4 , F>120GeV = 13% C.U., spectral slope =–3.0 ± 0.4
2 plot sky map
ApJL 642 (2006) 119
SED
R. M. Wagner: AGN observations with MAGIC – p.21
• High-peaked BL Lac objects
Cycle-I: 181 hours, 13 source candidates
Cycle-II: 99 hours• Low-peaked BL Lac objects
Cycle-I: 76 hours
Cycle-II: 86 hours• Monitoring of TeV-bright blazars
Cycle-II: 38 hours (70% done)
• Time-of-Opportunity observations (externally triggered)
Cycle-II: 11 hours
Upper limit publication of cycle-I HBLs upcoming...
MAGIC blazar observations