public works, parks, & human services committee meeting …council/committees/pwphs/... ·...

Public Works, Parks, & Human Services Committee Meeting Minutes Date: July 20, 2018

Attendance: Toby Nixon, Kurt Triplett, Tom Phillips, Lynn Zwaagstra, John Lloyd, John Starbard, Mary Gardocki, Kathy Brown, John MacGillivray, Jon Pascal (on phone), Kyle Butler, Jin Muse

Agenda Item: Action Items:

1. King County Construction Waste Recycling Notes: Seeking joint recommendation before taking back to PED. - Intent to lower to eliminated banned products from KC transfer stations (items that are easily recyclable) and diverted to a recycling station. - Requires that contractor provides a plan or assessment of how much material can be diverted from the landfill. - Required to put two bins on construction site: one for garbage and other for recycling. - Reconciliation of transfer station receipts matches or exceeds plan for sign off. - Concerns from building department is that there is no capacity for the amount of building going on.

Alternatives: 1. Do this at transfer station level rather than City level but King County is opposed (separate at site, policed at transfer station).

Recommends requiring 2 bins and writing some language on exceptions for sites that cannot fit two bins. Initial inspection after bins are placed but not policed. (Materials attached)

What does city have to do beyond informing contractors? 1. Inspectors would have to inspect bins and write correction notice if necessary (then follow up on correction). Section 9 of the presentation is the challenge to the city. - Verification of compliance is the burden that is the greatest concern. Design on incentives rather than enforcement. Have any other cities adopted an ordinance to this? Concerns with threshold? - Shoreline and Issaquah have adopted an ordinance but are not strict enforcement. - 1000 sq. ft. threshold is small enough to not require two bins when recycling can be loaded into the back of a truck (i.e. small remodel). Staff recommendations to be presented again at future committee meeting.

2. State Minimum Wage and Sick Leave Changes Notes: John Lloyd, Deputy Parks and Community Services Director, reviewed the minimum state wage increases along with an estimated impact in 2019 and 2020. Next steps are for the proposed wage chart to be reviewed by HR and the calculations to be reviewed by Finance. The new wages would be considered part of the base budget package. 2018 - $11.50 2019 - $12.00 2020 - $13.50 (Handout attached)

No council committee action is needed. Staff can submit a white paper with the budget submission to provide additional information.

3. Locke Pavilion Signage John Lloyd, Deputy Parks and Community Services Director, provided a concept design of the signage to honor Al Locke and the naming of the Marina Park Pavilion to “Al Locke Pavilion”. Staff are working with Mr. Locke’s family to schedule a sign unveiling for September. (Handout attached)

No council committee action is needed. Councilmembers requested to make sure sign placement does not block access since the pavilion can be accessed by all sides. Staff will pursue making and installing the sign and scheduling the sign unveiling for the fall.

4. Planned Unit Development Chapter of Kirkland Zoning Code Notes: David Barnes, Senior Planner, presented on the Planned Unit Development Chapter of Kirkland Zoning Code.

Briefed subcommittee on Code Amendments for Kirkland Zoning Code Chapter 125 - Planned Unit Developments (PUD)

Verified that Council members need additional financial information that compares the value of the PUD public benefits provided to the value of the benefits received by the applicant

Received feedback on revising list of public benefits which included adding adopted City-Plans to help applicants identify desirable City projects to consider providing as a public benefit

Received confirmation that Council would be supportive of funding a PUD benefits valuation tool that could be used in addition to existing requirement to make decisions on PUDs.

(Presentation attached)

Tentative Next Agenda August meeting is canceled.

CITY OF KIRKLAND Planning and Community Development Department 123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033 425.587-3225 - www.kirklandwa.gov

MEMORANDUM

To: Kurt Triplett, City Manager

From: Eric Shields, Director of Planning and Community Development Tom Phillips, Building Official

Date: January 24, 2018

Subject: Presentation by King County staff regarding the disposal of Construction and Demolition materials.

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council hear a presentation by King County staff regarding regulating the disposal of Construction and Demolition (C&D) materials through a model ordinance and discuss whether such an ordinance would be fitting for Kirkland.

BACKGROUND DISCUSSION King County Solid Waste has been meeting with City building officials, permitting staff, recycling coordinators and any other applicable staff to discuss King County’s C&D materials diversion model ordinance.

King County Ordinance 18166 (effective January 1, 2016) banned C&D materials of value from disposal in a landfill and established a system of designated facilities to which all C&D materials from jobsites in King County (outside of Seattle) should be going. However, while the city where a jobsite is located has authority over materials at that site, King County has authority over them once the materials leave the jobsite. King County has developed model C&D code language (attached) that cities in King County can adopt to ensure that permitting requirements are consistent and expectations around C&D materials are clear throughout the County.

Kinley Deller, King County’s C&D Materials Diversion Specialist, met with Kirkland staff on August 2, 2017 to explain the proposed model ordinance. Staff took the issue to the Planning and Economic Development Committee (PED) on October 9, 2017 for discussion. During the PED committee meeting staff identified two concerns. First, the proposed model ordinance would require additional staff to ensure compliance through field inspections, monitoring disposal activity and reviewing and approving required reports. Second, many of the building sites in Kirkland are too small to accommodate separate garbage and recycle containers. Therefore staff suggested that it would be more appropriate to regulate the disposal of C&D materials at the transfer station instead of the job site.

http://www.kirklandwa.gov/

Alternate formats available 206-477-4466, TTY Relay: 711 Printed on recycled paper – Jan18-AR

Department of Natural Resources and ParksSolid Waste Division

Building in King County?Here’s what you need to know about recycling and

disposal of construction and demolition (C&D) materials

(Clean, Untreated, Unpainted)

(Clean, Untreated,

Unpainted)

(New)

(New)

Wood Cardboard Metal

BricksAsphalt Paving

Concrete

Gypsum Scrap

Garbage

Additional information:

•• Readily recyclable materials from construction and demolition (C&D) projects are required to be

recycled. See the “Director’s List” of readily recyclable C&D materials at www.greentools.us

(search Director’s List”)

• Non-recyclable C&D waste and mixed C&D (recyclable material mixed with non-recyclable waste),

when generated in King County (outside of the cities of Seattle and Milton) must be sent to King

County designated C&D recycling and disposal facilities

• Single commodity recyclables (e.g. metal) from job sites can go directly to appropriate recycling

facilities (not required to go to designated C&D facilities)

• Abatement paperwork is required for all demolition loads at all facilities

• Bulk shipping containers can no longer be used to transport C&D waste from job sites to landfills

(Enforcement is currently being deferred under certain conditions - additional info available

at www.greentools.us - search “direct disposal”)

• Washington State regulations (WAC 173-345-040) require a separate collection container be

provided for waste at job sites that conduct recycling

• These requirements are detailed under King County Ordinance 18166 which became effective

January 1, 2016

For more informationContact the King County Solid Waste Division at 206-477-4466

711 (TTY Relay) or visit www.greentools.us

Recyclable materials

from construction and

demolition projects are

required to be recycled.

These readily recyclable

materials should be

separated at the job site

from garbage and

other waste. C&D waste cannot be

taken in dump vehicles

or dump trailers to King

County-owned transfer

stations.

See other side for designated C&D recycling and disposal facilities.

Construction & Demolition (C&D) Recycling and Disposal FacilitiesThese facilities have agreements with King County to properly manage C&D materials.

King County Designated C&D Recycling and Disposal Facilities

Designated C&D recycling facilities (for mixed recyclable C&D materials)•• Alpine Recycling

(note: no drop-offs, call for info)253-531-2127

• DRS Renton 701 SW 34th St. Renton, WA 98057 425-245-8015

• DRS Woodinville 5906 238th St SE, Suite B Woodinville, WA 98072 425-245-8015

• DTG Enterprises 22014 W Bostian Rd Woodinville, WA 98072 425-549-3012

• Maltby Container & Recycling (note: no drop-offs, call for info) 425-778-3688

• Recovery 1 1805 Stewart St. Tacoma, WA 98421 253-627-1180 / 800-949-5852

• United Recycling Seattle 74 S. Hudson St.Seattle, WA 98134206-209-1300

• United Recycling Woodinville

18827 Yew Way

Snohomish, WA 98296

360-668-4300

Designated C&D waste disposal facilities (for non-recyclable C&D waste)• 3rd & Lander Transfer Station

(owned by Republic Services) 2733 3rd Ave S Seattle, WA 98134 206-336-1365

• Black River (owned by Republic Services)501 Monster Road Renton, WA 98059 425-235-0269

• CRC/Cascade Recycle Center (owned by Waste Management) 425-419-7015 This facility is not open to public drive-in customers but is open to commercial customers.

• Eastmont (owned by Waste Management) 7201 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106 425-419-7015

• RNW/Recycle Northwest (owned by Waste Management) 355 H St. NW Auburn, WA 98001 425-419-7015

!(

")

!(

!(

!(

!(

")

")

")")

")

")

§̈¦90

§̈¦405§̈¦5

§̈¦5

UV520 UV202

UV167

UV518

UV522

§̈¦405

DRS Renton

Recovery 1

DTG Enterprises

DRS Woodinville

United Recycling Woodinville

United Recycling Seattle

Eastmont

Maltby Container & Recycling (No drop-off service)

Black River

RNW/Recycle Northwest

CRC/Cascade Recycle Center

3rd & Lander Transfer Station

Bothell

Lynnwood

Edmonds

MountlakeTerrace

Brier

Auburn

Tacoma

Seattle

Kent

Bellevue

Auburn

Renton

Kirkland

Federal Way

Sammamish

Redmond

Burien

SeaTac

Issaquah

Tukwila

Shoreline

Bothell

Kenmore

Covington

Newcastle

Pacific

Des Moines

Woodinville

Maple Valley

Mercer Island

Black Diamond

Medina

Lake Forest Park

Algona

Normandy Park

Milton

") Material Recovery Facility

!( Waste Transfer Facility

«

The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited ex cept by w ritten permission of King County.

Map Document: (Q:\SWD\working\projects\recycling_facilities\apps

\c&d_dropoff_facilities_july17.mxd

0 21Miles

September 12, 2017

Background for C&D Permitting Ordinance Proposal

Through the established Interlocal Agreements (ILAs) between King County Solid Waste and each of the incorporated jurisdictions within King County (excluding Seattle and Milton), King County Solid Waste has the responsibility to ensure that solid waste generated within the ILA contracted jurisdictions is managed in such a way as to protect human health and the environment.

In order to uphold King County Solid Waste’s commitment to this responsibility, with regard to materials generated through construction and demolition activities, King County adopted Ordinance 18166 which became effective January 1, 2016. This ordinance made amendments to King County Code Chapters 4A and 10.

The primary effects of this ordinance were to: 1) ban readily recyclable C&D materials of value from disposal in a landfill,2) establish and maintain a C&D facility designation/certification system for C&D material recovery

facilities and C&D waste transfer facilities, and3) establish and maintain an enforcement mechanism

While King County Solid Waste is charged with ensuring the safe disposal of the waste once it is transported from jobsites, authority over the jobsites and thus how C&D materials are collected, managed, and prepared for delivery off-site, falls under the purview of the building code permitting department for each incorporated jurisdiction.

For this reason, we are asking each of the building permitting jurisdictions within King County to encourage their elected officials to codify language which dovetails with King County Ordinance 18166 and requires building permit applicants to comply with the requirements which pertain to the materials generated on their jobsites once they leave the site. To facilitate this process, participants in the Regional Code Collaboration have developed the attached code language template.

Please direct questions to Kinley Deller at [email protected] or 206-477-5272.

KING COUNTY DOCUMENT

mailto:[email protected]

CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION MATERIALS DIVERSION (Model Ordinance)

Code Proposal:

16.xx DIVERSION OF BUILDING MATERIALS FROM LANDFILLS

Sec. 1. Title

This article shall be known as the Diversion of Building Materials From Landfills Ordinance of

______ (City/Town/County).

Sec. 2. Purpose

The purpose of this ordinance is to increase the reuse and recycling of construction and

demolition materials.

Sec. 3. Definitions

Unless otherwise expressly stated, the following words and terms shall, for the purposes of this

code, have the meanings shown in this section:

A. “Demolition” means the process of razing, relocation, or removal of an existing

building or structure, or a portion thereof.

B. “Divert”, “Diverted” and “Diversion” mean the reuse, recycling, or beneficial use of

construction and demolition materials.

C. “Reuse” means the diversion of a material, product, component, module, or a

building from entering the waste stream in order to use it again.

D. “Beneficial Use” means the use of solid waste as an ingredient in a manufacturing

process, or as an effective substitute for natural or commercial products in a manner

that does not pose a threat to human health or the environment.

E. “Deconstruction and salvage assessment” means a report which summarizes the

building components within an existing building (prior to demolition) that have the

potential to be reused after removal.

F. “Recycling” means transforming or remanufacturing waste materials into useable or

marketable materials for use other than landfill disposal or incineration. “Recycling”

does not include combustion of solid waste or preparation of a fuel from solid waste.

Sec. 4. Applicability

All projects that require a building permit and meet the following thresholds are subject to this

article:

A. Area of construction or demolition greater than 1,000 gross square feet floor area

[note: if permitting system does not track square feet make minimum threshold

$30,000] , or

B. Commercial tenant improvements with an area of construction greater than 2500

gross square feet.

Sec. 5. Diversion Requirement

A. Projects meeting the applicability thresholds outlined in Section 4 must divert all

banned materials from disposal.

B. (Optional) Projects meeting the applicability thresholds outlined in Section 4 must

also divert, by weight, a minimum of 50% of construction and demolition materials

removed from a building site.

Sec. 6. Exemptions

http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/greenbuilding/construction-demolition.asp

A. The code official may exempt the following:

1. Emergency work or disaster response performed in conjunction with an

emergency. [Reference local code provisions defining emergencies or disaster

response.]; and

2. Removal of buildings or structures determined to be hazardous or

dangerous.

Sec. 7. Documents to be Submitted with Application

A. The applicant shall submit the following:

1. A Waste Diversion statement of intent for projects that include new

construction, alterations, and whole building removal. The waste diversion

statement of intent shall clearly state that the project will comply with King

County disposal bans on readily recyclable materials (KCC 10.30.020. Statement

may be included as a check box on the demolition permit application form.

2. A deconstruction and salvage assessment for projects that include alterations

and whole building removal.

a. Projects that include whole building removal shall be prepared by a

third party approved by King County, prior to permit issuance;

3. Asbestos/Demolition project notification number from the Puget Sound Clean

Air Agency (PSCAA). Notifications are required for all demolitions with a roof

area greater than 120 square feet regardless of whether or not the building

contains any asbestos and any project involving 10 linear feet and/or 48 square

feet or more of friable asbestos containing material. Notifications are obtained at

www.pscleanair.org and a printed copy is required to be kept on site during the

asbestos/ demolition project.

Sec. 8. Additional Requirements

A. All construction and demolition loads that contain more than a single commodity

shall be sent to a facility designated under King County Code 10.30.020.

B. All jobsites shall have at least one clearly identified bin for recyclable materials that

will be sent to a designated processing facility for recycling or beneficial use, and a

separate bin for waste destined for a landfill.

C. For demolitions, an asbestos survey must be conducted by an AHERA certified

building inspector. These professionals can be found on the web or in phone books

under “Asbestos Consulting and Testing”. The results of the survey must either be

posted at the work site or communicated in writing to anyone who may come into

contact with the material. The only exception is if this is a single-family, owner-

occupied home, where owners may conduct their own survey for suspect

asbestos-containing materials (ACM).

D. When disposing of asbestos containing material at a disposal site authorized

to accept asbestos waste, a waste shipment record form must be completed.

Keep or request a copy for your records. This form can be downloaded at

www.pscleanair.org.

Sec. 9. Compliance with diversion requirements

A. Inspection Authority. During construction or building removal, [City/Town] and King

County may inspect project sites to determine compliance with this code.

B. Waste Diversion Report. A Waste Diversion Report shall be submitted prior to

permit finalization or issuance of a certificate of occupancy. A partial or temporary

http://www.pscleanair.org/

http://www.pscleanair.org/business/Asbestos/Pages/asbestosdisposal.aspx

certificate of occupancy may be issued prior to submittal of the Waste Diversion Report.

In instances where shared construction and demolition collection containers are used by

2 or more projects, periodic Waste Reports may be submitted in place of a final Waste

Diversion Report, as determined by the Code Official. The Waste Diversion Report shall

identify the weight of generated construction and demolition material removed from a

project site (documented by facility tip receipts); the hauler; and the receiving facility or

location for each commodity.

C. Proof of Diversion. The permitee shall provide proof of compliance, to be submitted

with the Waste Diversion Report:

1. For C&D recycled or disposed, the owner must provide receipts from the

designated facility which received each material for processing or transfer,

showing the actual weight of the material and whether the material has been

disposed in a landfill or diverted for reuse, recycling, or beneficial use. Each

receipt must clearly state the project title, the date materials were accepted and

whether the materials were disposed or diverted. All materials taken to a C&D

transfer station shall be counted as disposed (unless documentation is provided

that the materials were transferred to, and processed at, a C&D material

recovery facility). If the receipt provides information for multiple projects, the

project names and the amounts of material for each project must be clearly

identified.

2. For materials salvaged for reuse, the applicant must provide documentation

of the weights or a numerical inventory of material salvaged for reuse. Each

piece of documentation must clearly state the project name and the date

materials were accepted. If the receipt provides information for multiple

projects, the project titles and the amount of material for each project must be

clearly identified. A signed statement from the receiving location or photo

documentation must be included for salvaged materials for which a tip receipt

cannot be obtained.

3. Any additional information needed to support claims of compliance.

4. [Optional] When required documentation is not able to be provided a

notarized affidavit of compliance may be allowed as proof of diversion.

D. [Optional] [The Department] shall not take enforcement actions under this section

for one year after the effective date of this section.

Sec. 10. Determination of compliance [Optional]

[The Department] shall review the Waste Management Report and determine whether the

applicant has complied with the diversion requirement.

Sec. 11. Rules and regulations [Optional]

[The Department] is authorized to make all necessary and reasonable rules and regulations with

respect to the enforcement of this article. All such rules and regulations shall be consistent with

the provisions of this article.

Division Wages Benefits Wages Benefits Wages BenefitsMaintenance & Operations $0 $0 $56,019 $15,864 $101,349 $28,733

Admin $22,620 $4,864 $0 $0 $0 $0

Event Services $14,391 $3,075 $0 $0 $0 $0

Peter Kirk CC $114,507 $25,621 $0 $0 $0 $0

Recreation Services $31,546 $8,201 $0 $0 $0 $0

North Kirkland CC $195,759 $45,851 $0 $0 $0 $0

Aquatics $173,012 $51,187 $0 $0 $81,761 $23,898

Total $551,835 $138,799 $56,019 $15,864 $183,110 $52,631


Admin $22,620 $4,864 $0 $0 $0 $0

Event Services $14,391 $3,075 $0 $0 $0 $0

Peter Kirk CC $123,737 $27,507 $0 $0 $0 $0



Aquatics $197,286 $56,147 $0 $0 $97,331 $27,081

Total $594,946 $147,609 $56,986 $16,061 $200,694 $56,225Increase $43,111 $8,810 $967 $197 $17,584 $3,594

Total Increase by Fund


Admin $22,620 $4,891 $0 $0 $0 $0

Event Services $15,150 $3,247 $0 $0 $0 $0

Peter Kirk CC $141,289 $31,284 $0 $0 $0 $0



Aquatics $222,560 $62,335 $0 $0 $107,888 $29,710

Total $668,566 $164,314 $58,909 $16,738 $213,327 $59,792Increase $116,731 $25,515 $2,890 $874 $30,217 $7,161

Total Increase by Fund

Biennial Increase $159,842 $34,325 $3,857 $1,071 $47,801 $10,755Biennial Increase by Fund

$21,178$1,164$51,921

$194,167 $4,928 $58,556

$142,246 $3,764 $37,378

Parks & Community Services Personnel Recaps

2020 Summary - Updated Wages010 General Fund

010 General Fund 125 Parks Maint Fund 128 Park Levy

125 Parks Maint Fund 128 Park Levy

2019 Summary - Base Wages (before wage corrections)

125 Parks Maint Fund 128 Park Levy

010 General Fund2019 Summary - Updated Wages

Inspiration:

Proposed Layout:

Al Locke Pavilion

The residents of Kirkland owe a debt of gratitude to the city’s first City Manager, Al Locke, serving in this role from 1965-1985. Mr. Locke was known as a champion of waterfront parks and a watchful steward of city finances. Among the many projects during his career with the City of Kirkland, Marina Park and Pavilion stands out as a symbol of his desire to provide a place for families while enhancing and protecting the shoreline. Upon completion, the pavilion

ultimately became the logo of the City of Kirkland. By naming the pavilion after Locke, his legacy will forever be remembered by future generations. Locke retired from the City of Kirkland on July 1, 1985 after serving in his role for

20 years and six mayors, a feat he attributed to a good sense of humor and being left handed.

Career Highlights and Accomplishments

• Developed the first Parks Master Plan in 1965 • Oversaw the merger of Houghton and Kirkland in 1968 • Expanded the Parks system from 35 acres to over 70 acres by 1980 including 12 acres of waterfront parks • Played a key role in convincing Costco to locate its corporate headquarters in Kirkland • Worked behind the scenes to convince the Seahawks to locate their original practice facility in Kirkland

Planned Unit Development (PUD)KZC Chapter 125 Code Update

CAM18-00380

PW-PK-HS Committee

July 20, 2018

Agenda

• Background

• Review key issues

• Discuss and provide staff direction on key issues

What is a PUD?

A PUD is a mechanism that allows an applicant to propose a development that is beneficial to the City, but may not strictly comply with all code requirements (although some code requirements, such as those pertaining to critical areas such as wetlands and streams may not be modified using a PUD).

How Have PUD’s Been Used Recently?

• Residential subdivision

Public Benefit:

-Rapid Rectangular Flashing Traffic Beacon

-Open Space over detention vault

Value to developer

-Reduced lot sizes, measuring height from finished grade, averaging lot coverage and floor area over entire site, increased density

How Have PUD’s Been Used Recently?

• Commercial development

Public Benefit-

-Extra 100’ buffer between development and adjacent residential zone

-810’ of sidewalk across street from development

Value to developer

-Land encumbered by wetland and streams is now

developable (approximately 3.74 acres)

Trigger for PUD Code Amendments

• City Council’s desire to identify dollar value of public benefits provided to the City compared to benefits received by the applicant

Key Issue - 1

• Establishing method to value the public benefits vsthe value of the PUD to the applicant

- Applicant provides a report overseen by City

- Applicant provides their own report

- City contracts with economic firm to develop valuation tools for City use (Staff surveyed 2 local Economic Development firms)

Feedback on Key Issue 1

• Discuss and provide direction to staff

1. Is the comparison between developer value and public benefits the needed financial information required to make informed decisions?

2. Rough cost to produce a valuation tool $30-40K

Key Issue - 2

• Revising criteria in KZC 125.25(3) to update list of beneficial public benefits

- Update list based on Comprehensive Plan and other adopted city-wide plans

Staff recommends updating the list

Next Steps

• Return to Planning Commission on August 9th 2018