ptr-ms / ptr-tof-ms voc fluxes during nomaads
DESCRIPTION
PTR-MS / PTR-TOF-MS VOC fluxes during NOMAADS. NCAR, NOAA, NILU, UIBK. PTR-MS. Proton transfer reaction. Calculation of the neutral concentration. Target compounds: Isoprene, isoprene oxidation products. PTR-MS. Slides into 1 bay of C-130 rack - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PTR-MS / PTR-TOF-MSVOC fluxes during NOMAADS
NCAR, NOAA, NILU, UIBK
PTR-MS
)()(1][
3
OHcps
VOCHcpstk
VOC
Proton transfer reaction
Calculation of the neutral concentration
OHVOCHVOCOH k23
Target compounds: Isoprene, isoprene oxidation products
PTR-MS• Slides into 1 bay of C-130 rack
• 2nd bay needed for additional options: i.e. inlet pump, calgas
• HIMIL inlet on C-130 requested
• For EC flux measurements we can only monitor 2-3 compounds (ie. isoprene, MVK+MAC and perhaps Meoh or MT)
Rack during MirageMIRAGE/INTEX-B
Note: For NOMAADS we will need to request space adjacent to PTRMS for inlet pump and calibration unit
Alternative or complimentary
• Due to a broader chemistry focus of NOMAADS, a PTR-TOF-MS is proposed to be flown in collaboration between NILU, NOAA, UIBK and NCAR instead or along with PTR-MS
• Instrument comes already prepackaged in a NASA P-3 rack
• Inlet requirements will be the same as for PTR-MS
PTR-TOF-MS footprint
POWER: 120V/1000WWeight: 600 lbs
PTR-MS (NCAR) vs PTR-TOF-MS (NILU/NOAA/UIBK/NCAR)
• PTR-TOF-MS advantages: no pre-selection of compounds needed – we can measure the entire mass spectrum at 10 Hz
• LOD: similar btw. PTR-TOF-MS and PTR-MS for a nominal mass (i.e. compound), but much lower for PTR-TOF-MS, when considering that the instrument scans over the entire mass range
• PTR-TOF-MS disadvantage: somewhat lower sensitivity, but probably acceptable for isoprene flux measurements
• PTR-TOF-MS will also have the option of a SRI (selective reagion ionization) capability
EC flux leg flight patterns
• Horizontal gradients (land cover characterization)
• Vertical gradients (flux divergence measurements)
Will need 20 Hz data stream post-flight
2011 CIRPAS Twin OtterNCAR/UC Berkeley/CIRPAS
Horizontal PBL gradients
160.76 160.78 160.8 160.82 160.84 160.86 160.88 160.9 160.920
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
doy
Alti
tude
(m)
Radar Altimeter (m)Ground elevation (m)Altitude (m a.s.l)Altitude (m a.g.l.)
PBL soundings
Altitude above ground – PBL height
160.75 160.8 160.85 160.90
500
1000
1500
2000Extrapolated PBL
Forest: fetch about 10 x PBL height
20 nm
1 nm
View from top
PBL
Flight track
Race track
Sounding (up to 4000-7000 ft depending on PBL) at beginning and end of each profileSounding can be a “sawtooth” on the outbound leg, should be a spiral between consecutive profiles and a “saw tooth” on the inboundleg: climb rate 500 ft/min
Saw tooth sounding on outbound and inbound legs
Spiral
surface
Synoptic Wind
1 track is about 30 minutesEntire profile is about 1.5 hours at
70 m/s
Profiles flown during CABERNET
wind
Flux divergence
-0.3 -0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
isoprenewTqw
normalized flux
z/zi
Determine OH:4 x 106 molecules / cm3
Surface flux
Entrainment flux
MEGAN - Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature
OA
K W
OO
DLA
ND
S
Flux processing (FFT and wavelet decomposition)
-6000 -4000 -2000 0 2000 4000 6000-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5 x 104
0 20 40 60 80 100-10
0
10
[c -
mea
n(c)
]/sqr
t(c) a) VOC
0 20 40 60 80 100
2 4 8
163264
b) Wavelet Cross Spectrum
Perio
d (s
)
0
0.5
1
0 20 40 60 80 100-10
0
10
Distance [km]
Av.
cro
ssva
rianc
e d) Scale-average Time Series
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Hz
f x
CoS
<w' 'T' 'fft>
<w' 'VOC' 'fft>
<w' 'T' 'wave>
<w' 'VOC' 'wave>
566.4342 56.64342 5.664342 0.5664342 0.05664342km
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Hz
f x C
oS
<w' 'T' 'fft>
<w' 'VOC' 'fft>
<w' 'T' 'wave>
<w' 'VOC' 'wave>
Flux divergenceEntrainment Flux
z/h
PBL top
Flux
Surface Flux
Reactive compound
More reactive compound
Flux profile = function of Dahmkoehler number Da
Da = mixing timescale / chemical timescale