provisional end of key stage outcomes v4 this includes provisional indications of performance by...

14
Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As at 07 September 2015 1

Upload: cordelia-little

Post on 02-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4

This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early

Years and at Key Stage 2

As at 07 September 2015

1

Page 2: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Early Years Foundation Stage Provisional results for 2015 show that performance has

improved in Cambridgeshire and nationally.

Cambridgeshire performance is broadly in-line with the provisional national level.

Vulnerable groups have improved but only three groups have improved at a faster rate than their peers: Those speaking languages ‘Other than English’ Those speaking Central/Eastern European languages And boys

2

Page 3: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Year 1 Phonics Cambridgeshire’s performance has provisionally improved by

around 1ppt.

Nationally performance has provisionally improved by around 3ppt.

Performance in Cambridgeshire is around 2ppt below the national level.

3

Page 4: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Key Stage 1 Cambridgeshire’s performance has provisionally improved by

around 1ppt.

Nationally performance also improved slightly and performance in Cambridgeshire is broadly in-line with the national level in both Writing and Maths but marginally (1ppt) below in Reading.

Note that in 2013, this cohort was just below the national level in the EYFSP %GLD.

4

Page 5: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Key Stage 2 Cambridgeshire performance has provisionally improved by 1ppt in both

Writing (to 86%) and Maths (to 85%) and by 2ppt in Reading, Writing and Maths combined (to 78%) but declined by 1ppt in Reading (to 88%).

Nationally, performance improved by 1ppt in Writing (to 80%), in Maths (to 87%) and in Reading, Writing and Maths combined (to 80%). Nationally, performance in Reading was unchanged (89%).

Cambridgeshire performance is still below the level seen nationally in each subject and in all three combined but has closed the gap by 1ppt in Reading, Writing & Maths combined.

Although performance across our statistical neighbours was unchanged in all three subjects and in Reading, Writing and Maths combined, it remains above that of Cambridgeshire for all four benchmarks.

5

Page 6: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

KS2 Reading L4+ recent trends

KS2 Writing TA L4+ recent trends

KS2 Maths L4+ recent trends

86

89

87

8485

8685

8988

76

78

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Cambridgeshire

Statistical Neighbours

England

6971

67

71

76

81 81

84 85

64666870727476788082848688

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Cambridgeshire

Statistical Neighbours

England

80 8079 79

80

8482

8485

7072747678808284868890

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Cambridgeshire

Statistical Neighbours

England

Source: DFE SFR but note that 2015 figures are provisional 6

Page 7: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

66

74

72

76

78

64

66

68

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% a

ttai

ning

L4

or a

bove

Cambridgeshire

England

Statistical Neighbours

%L4+ in Key Stage 2 Reading, in Writing and in Maths (144 LAs)

DFE (SFR) 2012 2013 2014 2015 Direction of Travel

Cambridgeshire 74 72 76 78 +2ppt

England 75 75 79 80 +1ppt

Revised Statistical Neighbours

76 77 80 80 In-line

7Source: DFE SFR but note that 2015 figures are provisional

Page 8: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Key Stage 1 to Key Stage 2 Progress

The proportion of Cambridgeshire pupils making expected progress between Key Stage 1 and key Stage 2 improved by 2ppt in Writing (to 93%) and was unchanged in Maths (87%) but declined by 1ppt in Reading (to 89%).

Nationally, performance improved by 1ppt in Writing (to 94%) and was unchanged in Maths (90%) and in Reading (91%).

Performance across our statistical neighbours was unchanged in Reading (91%) and Writing (93%) but declined by 1ppt in Maths (to 88%)

Cambridgeshire’s performance is below the national level in all three subjects and below that seen across our statistical neighbours in Reading and Maths but now in-line with our statistical neighbours in Writing.

8

Page 9: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Making Expected progress: KS1 to KS2 Reading recent trends

Making Expected progress: KS1 to KS2 Writing recent trends

Making Expected progress: KS1 to KS2 Maths recent trends

89

86

9089

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

2012 2013 2014 2015

Cambridgeshire

Statistical Neighbours

England

89 8991

93

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

2012 2013 2014 2015

Cambridgeshire

Statistical Neighbours

England

86

84

87 87

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

2012 2013 2014 2015

Cambridgeshire

Statistical Neighbours

England

9Source: DFE SFR but note that 2015 figures are provisional

Page 10: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Percentage Achieving L4+ R, W & M2013 2014 2015

Direction of Travel

13/14

Direction of Travel 14/15

Change since 2013

All Pupils (6240 pupils) (An increase of 93 pupils) 71.9 75.9 77.8 4 2 6

Boys (3195 pupils) (+17) 68.2 74.1 74.2 6 - 6

Girls (3045 pupils) (+76) 75.8 77.9 81.6 2 4 6

FSM (Jan Census) (687 pupils) (+29) 46.7 51.2 53.1 5 2 6

Non-FSM (Jan Census) (5452 pupils) (-37) 75.2 78.9 81.4 4 3 6

FSM-6 (1277 pupils) (+25) 53.0 56.1 60.5 3 4 8

Non-FSM-6 (4862 pupils) (+102 – there are less unknown pupils) 77.0 81.1 82.9 4 2 6

Any SEN (1144 pupils) (-169 pupils) 27.9 30.4 31.2 3 1 3

Non-SEN (5043 pupils) (+209 pupils) 85.6 88.5 88.7 2 - 3

Home Language: English (5500 pupils) (-76) 73.0 76.1 78.4 3 2 5

Home Language: Central/Eastern European (246) (+43) 47.9 51.7 65.9 4 14 18

Home Language: Other than English (682 pupils) (+111) 63.6 70.2 75.5 7 5 12

Combined FSM Jan & Any SEN (257 pupils) (-60) 15.8 23.5 18.9 8 5 3

Combined Non-FSM Jan & Non-SEN (4569 pupils) (+108) 86.1 89.4 90.4 3 1 4

Note. 2015 figures are Provisional (Nexus). Percentage point changes have been rounded.

See

nex

t sl

ide

Page 11: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

Key Stage 4 (GCSE)

11

Note that the Key Stage 4 results for 2014 and 2015 are not comparable with those in previous years.

Early indications are that Cambridgeshire’s end of Key Stage 4 performance has improved:

A 4ppt rise in the proportion of pupils gaining 5+ GCSE grades A*-C, including English and Maths (to 59.6%)

A 2ppt rise in the proportion of pupils making expected progress in English (to 73.7%), and an

8ppt rise in the proportion making expected progress in Maths (to 72.2%).

However, the proportion of disadvantaged pupils achieving 5+ GCSE grades A*-C, including English and Maths has provisionally only improved by 1ppt (to 32.2%) and therefore the gap has widened.

Page 12: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

The Percentage of pupils achieving 5+ GCSE grades A*-C including English and Maths (all pupils), ‘First Entry’ only

55.959.6

53.457.2 59.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2014 2015

5+

A*-

C in

c E

n &

Ma

(%

)

Cambridgeshire England East of England Statistical Neighbours

12Source: DfE LAIT and Academy data returns

Note that in 2014: 56.6% of pupils at ‘state funded schools’ achieved 5+ GCSE grades A*_C, inc English & Maths

Page 13: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

The Percentage of KS4 pupils making expected progress in English

13Source: DfE LAIT and Academy data returns

72 73.771.6 72.6 72.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2014 2015

% 3

+ L

vls

Pro

g E

ng

lish

Cambridgeshire England East of England Statistical Neighbours

Page 14: Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As

The Percentage of KS4 pupils making expected progress in Maths

14Source: DfE LAIT and Academy data returns

63.8

72.2

65.5 66.9 68.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2014 2015

% 3

+ L

vls

Pro

g M

ath

s

Cambridgeshire England East of England Statistical Neighbours