promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:the case for rangelands

23
Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes: The case for rangelands Jimmy Smith THE WORLD BANK Meeting of the Norwegian Climate Network, Oslo, 31 August 2011

Upload: ilri

Post on 25-May-2015

1.630 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented by Jimmy Smith to a meeting of the Norwegian Climate Network, Oslo, 31 August 2011

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Promoting carbon sequestration and payment

for ecosystem service schemes:

The case for rangelands

Jimmy Smith

THE WORLD BANK

Meeting of the Norwegian Climate Network, Oslo, 31 August 2011

Page 2: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Rangelands are important for livelihoods and the environment

There are opportunities for rangeland management to contribute to:Carbon stocksBiodiversityWater resources

Incentives for good management need to contribute to livelihoods

Challenges for measuring, monitoring and payments remain

Key messages

Page 3: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Climate – carbon stocks

Biodiversity

Water and sediment management

Wind erosion control

Payment for ecosystem services

Page 4: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Carbon in most rangelands below saturation level

Under saturation offers scope to sequester carbon:

Improved grazing management Management to build organic matter Managing fire Restoring degraded lands (pasture species and

management)

Carbon sequestration in rangelands

Page 5: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Getting the science right -measuring, monitoring and reporting carbon stocksIncentives structure for good rangeland managementAssessing and rewarding good management Co-benefits (water, soil health, biodiversity)

Mechanisms for fundingResearch and payments

Institutional –local and globalEquityCollective action vs. individualManaging mobility

Carbon sequestration -the challenges

Page 6: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Why rangelands?

Page 7: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Tropical arid and semi-arid rangeland based systems

population density less than 20 persons/km²length of growing period (LGP) less than 60 days/annum

no significant crop production possible

Page 8: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Largest land use system on earth

35 million km2 – 24% of the total land area

Support 50% of the World’s livestock

Page 9: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

200 million people depend on rangelands for livelihoods

Half live on less than $2/day

Page 10: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Multipurpose rangelands for livelihoods and the

environment

Livestock productivity“sustainable

intensification”Environmental

stewardship“Payment for Ecosystem

Services”

Page 11: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Potential of rangelands for carbon

sequestration?

Page 12: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Atmospheric C

C sequestration

Reduce emissions

X

Page 13: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Where is the carbon?

G T Carbon

Total forestsTemperate grasslandsTropical grasslandsOther

Page 14: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Potential C sequestration by 2040

Agrofo

restr

y

Grazin

g manage

ment

Fore

st manage

ment

Cropland m

anagement

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

M T

C y

r-1

Page 15: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Potential for carbon sequestration (Tg C/yr) in global rangelands of different grazing intensity

light moderate Strong extreme Total

Africa

Australia/

Pacific

Eurasia

North

America

South

America

Total

1.9

4.5

0.8

0

6.1

13.3

8.6

-0.1

3.2

1.6

11.3

24.4

6.1

0.0

0.6

0.7

7.4

0.1

0.3

0.4

16.7

4.4

4.3

2.2

18.1

45.7

Moderate grazing improves sequestration!

Page 16: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Potential of rangelands for other ecosystem services?

Page 17: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Importance of rangelands for global biodiversity

Hotspots of biodiversity “Gene-banks” for animal and forage diversity High level of endemism Migrations of large herbivores

Page 18: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Payment for wildlife conservation Example: Olare Orok group ranch

2002-2004 – preparation:• Visioning future income from tourism• Inventorying resources and opportunities • Connecting tourist operators and land owners • Develop business plan PES for wildlife conservation

2006: Establishment of Olare Orok Conservancy (OOC) and institutional arrangements

Over 40 community based conservancies in Kenya (also southern Africa); I million ha

Payments from $1 to $40/ha – sufficient to impact poverty levels

Page 19: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Poverty impacts of PWC on Olare Orok Conservancy, (OOC) Maasai Mara, Kenya

N Mean income (US$/person/day)

CV % Contribution to household income

Agriculture Wildlife Conservation

Mara Group Ranches (1998-2004)

210 0.84 116 70 21

OOC – PWC 2009 58 1.51 157 79OOC + PWC 2009 73 2.45 93 42 40

1. Individuals: Higher income for those benefitting from PWC in Olare Orok Conservancy (OOC)

2. Households: Significant % household income derived from PWC payments

3. Equity income among households increased because families received more or less same area of land

Page 20: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Water resources

Upstream livestock grazing impacts on sediment loads downstream :ReservoirsHydro plants

Potential for incentives to manage grazing upstream

Page 21: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Wind erosion (China)Flood preventionWater release

Other potential opportunities for payments for rangeland management with ecosystem benefits

Page 22: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Rangelands are important for livelihoods and the environment

There are opportunities for rangeland management to contribute to:Carbon stocksBiodiversityWater resources

Incentives for good management need to contribute to livelihoods

Challenges for measuring, monitoring and payments remain

Key messages

Page 23: Promoting carbon sequestration and payment for ecosystem service schemes:The case for rangelands

Thank you