Program Review:

Beyond Compliance to Program Improvement

Kathleen Gorski, Ed.D

National Louis University

Founded in 1886 College of Professional Studies and Advancement• Allied health• Applied behavioral sciences• Human services• Business and Management

National College of Education• School of Teacher Preparation• School of Advanced Professional

Programs

Campus Locations:Illinois:

Chicago, Elgin, Lisle, Skokie, and Wheeling

Wisconsin: Milwaukee and Beloit

Florida: Tampa

Enrollment: 7000

Gender: F=80% M=20%

Diversity: 44% Minority

Age: 35

NLU Mission & Values

• Mission Statement: National Louis University provides access to quality higher education that nurtures opportunity for students through innovative teaching, scholarship, community engagement, and service excellence.

• Values: Excellence, Respect, Access, Collaboration, Passion, Inquiry, Innovation, Engagement

NLU Serves

• Working adults that have attended multiple institutions

• Historically underserved populations• Immigrants and first generation English

speakers.

PROGRAM REVIEW HISTORYNational Louis University

The 30 Page Report

• Culture of Quality• Financial Viability• Innovative Teaching and Scholarship• Community Engagement • Service and Operational Excellence

What happened to the report?

It was “Put on a Shelf”

Does this sound familiar?

What are your Institutions doing for Program Review?

We thought we were doing the right thing, but it wasn’t working

How did we know it wasn’t working?

Prior to 2012 • There were a few or no students enrolled in several programs.

• There were programs that were not aligned with the University mission and vision.

• The University did not have the resources to invest in the programs to gain an appropriate and sustainable market share.

• Overall Debt Concerns

A REMARKABLE AND COURAGEOUS DEPARTURE IN THE WAY THAT NLU HAS DONE BUSINESS

Program Prioritization

Academic Portfolio Prioritization

Eliminated 12 programs Reengineered 37

Maintained 12

The University used an engaging transparent process that involved stakeholders from throughout the institution with the end result of reducing overall budgets by 15% and re-positioning the institution to support strategic priorities that would advance growth and improve customer service in the process.

High level academic visionWe will position NLU for a vibrant sustainable future where…….

Excellence permeates our work and we have the evidence to prove it.

Students are engaged in learning that connects conceptual learning and practice. They are exposed to real life situations. Programs are relevant and market driven.

The NLU experience advances student professional identity, enhances career goal achievement and instills a commitment to lead and to serve

We needed a new Process

What We Knew

We didn’t want to reinvent the wheel

• Culture of Quality• Financial Viability• Innovative Teaching and Scholarship• Community Engagement • Service and Operational Excellence

We wanted to:

• Use data to help programs understand their programs.

• Use data across programs to understand how their program fit within the University portfolio of programs.

• Use data for improvement, not elimination.

• Incorporate University assessment

And we wanted to:

2013-2014 Created a new process

• We Defined Program Review Criteria • Worked with Colleges to select preferred metrics• We Created a Rubric for review• We decided to use existing reports as evidence instead of

completing ANOTHER report.(Reports completed for the state, for external accreditors etc.)

• New process = Four annual updates. • Fifth year = Review = Trend analysis over time. Approvals at

and by University Curriculum Council, Provost and College Dean.

2014-2015 Implement the process

• Bad Timing…• Senate had their 3 - year committee

commitment end. • New term began and we had almost all new

faculty members.

Criteria and Ratings

Why Are We Being Rated?

• What does Needs Improvement mean?

• What is Acceptable?

• What is Effective?

• What is Distinctive?

Please Define The Following Words:

Quality and Effectiveness became Health

HEALTH

Quality

Effectiveness

The Data

The Web Form

The Results

From:Faculty PrepareProgram Review

College Committees Review Programs

Reviewed by the Dean

Review by the UCC

Accepted by Faculty Senate

Reviewed by the Provost

To:

5-Year Review Process

Stage 1 Program Faculty Prepare

for Program Review

Stage 2 College Leadership Team

Discussion: Alignment and Resources

Stage 3 Review and Acceptance by

UCC and Provost

“Health” refocused the purpose from elimination to support

Areas Of:Concern

CompetenceExcellence

% in each category all programs to compare years with the goal of continuous improvement.

How did we SIMPLIFY?

• All data provided to programs through a Share Point site.

• A Web form was created to enter data• Annual update report was designed to be

completed at program faculty meetings.• Programs can use their existing college

reports. • We reduced the approval process

How did we improve?

• Programs receive data on an annual basis• Programs review university assessment data• Programs can set goals as they relate to their

place within the university portfolio• Results of the Areas inform the budget cycle,

programs most in need can receive funds. • All goals linked to the Mission• Accountability on goals and the opportunity to

share best practices