process simulation test- islamabad

Upload: ajmalnasir

Post on 13-Apr-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    1/33

    ROCESS SIMULATION TEST

    IN INJECTABLE

    VALIDATION

    (MEDIA FILL)

    DR. AJMAL NASIRDirector Technical

    BF Biosciences ltd

    LAHORE

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    2/33

    INJECTABLES

    Injections must be sterile and as per definition shall be Free

    from Organisms,

    Sterility is One of the most examined areas of pharmaceutical

    and medical device manufacturing .

    he favored method to assure sterility is erminal Sterili!ation" #utoclaving or Irradiation etc$.

    %aterials sensitive to heat can not be terminally sterili!ed.

    &ence ASEPTIC PROCESS andASEPTIC FILLING .

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    3/33

    ASEPTIC PROCESSING?

    The Production Of Sterile Drug Products By Bringing

    Together The Product, Container & Closure sterilized

    through different Sterilization Methods Separately, And

    Assemled !n An"#tremely $igh %uality "nironment

    By S'illed Personnel (sing The )ight "*uipment And

    Techni*ues+

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    4/33

    ASEPTIC FILLING

    #septic filling is an #septic 'rocessthat re(uires the close coordinationand complex interaction bet)een *

    Personnel,

    Sterilized Product,

    The ill-inish "*uipment System, Cleanroom - Support acilities,

    Sterilized illing Components+

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    5/33

    HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

    S+'+%+- //0* #fter 12 years F3# replaced older guidelines In September

    //0,)ith an updated document,

    Guidance for Industry - Sterile Drug ProductsProduced by Aseptic Processing - Current GoodManufacturing Practices.

    +urope made some changes to the *

    'EC Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice Anne!I Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products"

    hese documents initiated a thought process at various

    forums. %ore focus on sterility #ssurance

    #septic 'rocess Simulations faced significant

    changes as compared to other parts .

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    6/33

    ASEPTIC FILLING

    #septic processing is a process being operated in a controlled 4

    but NOT STERILE ENVIRONMENT .

    'robability of non5sterility cannot be calculated.

    Involves a great deal of process control, )ith sensitive handling

    of components until they are sealed )ithin their final

    containers.

    #ll efforts are made to minimize the ris o! contamination"

    he industry )or6s to a recogni!ed, accepted contamination

    levels, 'robability of viable contamination is recogni!ed and calculated

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    7/33

    To "nsure The Sterility Of ProductsPurporting To Be Sterile, Sterilization,

    Aseptic illing And Closing Operations Must

    Be Ade*uately .alidated /0 122+2234+

    he goal of even the most effective

    sterili!ation processes can be defeated if the

    sterili!ed elements of a product "the drugformulation, the container, and the closure$

    are brought together under conditions that

    contaminate any of those elements.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    8/33

    STERILITY ASSURANCE CHALLENGE

    7ontamination Is #n +ver5'resent hreat .

    %aterials , surfaces and inefficiencies in air filtration may

    carry organisms.

    'otential viable contamination comes from o#erators

    running the process.

    Sterility testing Sample numbers are too small to detect

    lo$ le%el contamination.

    Only GROSS contamination is li6ely to be detected.

    Sterility #ssurance need another ool to 8uarantee .

    Process Sim&lations 'Me(ia Fills) supported byenvironmental monitoring and other related processes

    demonstrates control of the process to the industry

    standard for allo)able contamination levels.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    9/33

    STERILITY TEST VERSUS MEDIA FILL

    Sterility est %edia Fill

    8uidance3ocuments

    F3# 8uidance for Industry7ode of Federal

    -egulations%ultiple 'harmacopeia

    F3# 8uidance for Industry+9 8uide to 8ood

    %anufacturing 'ractice-evision to #nnex 1

    Sample si!e:;ot %aximum / #ll

    %edia Soybean57asein 3igest%edium "S$Fluid hioglycollate %edium"F%$

    ryptic Soya roth"Soybean57asein 3igest %edium "S$$"F% in case anaerobesdetected in sterility Failure$

    Incubationconditions

    S 10 days < /5=>7F% 10 days < ?/5?=>7

    S 2 days < /5=>7S 2 days < ?/5?=>7

    8ro)th promotion @es @es

    est method 3estructive*Sample contents transferred

    Aon5destructive*Integral container

    Sensitivity False positives3etects high level sterility

    failure

    Ao false positives3etects single vial failure

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    10/33

    PROCESS SIMULATION

    7ommonly Bno)n as *MEDIA FILL+"

    7arried out to demonstrate that the process is capableand robust enough to produce products )ith highest

    degree of Sterilit, Ass&rance"

    %edia fills utili!e culture media in place of product to

    evaluate contamination levels and validate #septic

    'rocessing .

    %edia Fill 'rogram 'rovides +valuation Of %ultiple

    Systems.

    he media fill should be designed to mimic, as closely as

    possible to the aseptic processes used in practice.

    'rocess Simulation is ONE element in the

    validation of an aseptic process.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    11/33

    DEFINITION

    he C%edia FillC, or Croth FillC, techni(ue, is one

    in )hich a li-&i( micro.iolo/ical n&trient /ro$th

    me(i&mis prepared and filled in a simulation of a

    normal manufacturing operation. he nutrient

    medium processed and handled in a manner )hich

    sim&lates the 0normal0 man&!act&rin/ #rocess as

    closely as possible )ith the same exposure topossible contamination '!rom o#erators1

    en%ironment1 e-&i#ment an( s&r!aces) as )ould

    occur during routine manufacture. he sealed

    containers of medium thus produced are thenincubated &n(er #rescri.e( con(itions and

    examined for evidence of microbial gro)th, and

    thus of an indication of the level of contaminated

    units produced. Health Canada

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    12/33

    PROCESS SIMULATION TEST

    est shall be designed to accurately represent the

    aseptic process.Follo)ing 'arameters shall be addressed in est

    3esign*

    S93@ 3+SI8A

    %+3I# FI;; 3O79%+A F-+D9+A7@

    %+3I# FI;; -9A SIE+ S'++3

    +AGI-OA%+A#; 7OA-O;

    %+3I# D9#;I@

    IA79#IOA FI;;+3 9AIS #A#;@SIS

    -+S9;S IA+-'-+#IOA

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    13/33

    PRE - REQUISITES

    Galidated manufacturing process.

    Galidated e(uipment.

    Galidated sterili!ation cycles.

    rained and (ualified 'ersonnel.

    #ll materials suitable for sterile manufacturing :

    processing.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    14/33

    STUDY DESIGN

    Shall cover all possible contamination -is6s.

    Shall closely simulate process.

    Horst case scenarios incorporated .

    Shall contain*

    ;ongest possible runs

    Aormal and non routine interventions.

    ;yophili!ation "if applicable$. #ssembling of e(uipment " start up and during processing$

    Aumber of )or6ers : activities

    #septic additions " container , closure 7harging, transfers$

    8o)n changes, shift 7hanges,

    #septic sampling

    ;ine speed

    Height chec6s

    7ontainer closure systems

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    15/33

    MEDIA FILL DOCUMENT

    # )ritten approved atch -ecord.

    Same vigilance as In -outine -un.

    7lear 3efinition of -ationales.

    # separate 3ocument approval for each -un.

    3etailed instructions for the test .

    7omplete list of planned interventions

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    16/33

    LIST OF PERMITTED INTERVENTIONS

    DURING FILLING

    #djustment of )eight in the dosing )heel.#djustment of Stopper holding spring.

    ransfer of li(uid from container to hopper.

    ransfer of stoppers from bag to hopper.

    'ic6ing un stoppered vials from the out feed bac6 to conveyor for

    stoppering.

    #djustment of separator.

    'ic6ing up of fallen vials from turn table.

    7leaning of machine )ith vacuum cleaner.

    #djustment of stoppering channel height.

    #djustment of stoppering pressure rollers.

    LIST OF PERMITTED INTERVENTIONS

    DURING FILLINGLIST OF PERMITTED INTERVENTIONS

    DURING FILLING

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    17/33

    LIST OF PERMITTED INTERVENTIONS

    DURING FILLING

    -eplacing of a piston from the )heel.

    #djustment of turn table over load sensor.

    ;ifting and closing of the ;#F cabinet door.

    7hec6ing the )eight in balance.

    #djustment of dosing air.

    7leaning of vacuum pot.

    'ushing stopper in the channel by forceps.

    'o)er interruption "samples should be mar6ed$

    Aumber of personnel in sterile filling area " persons$.

    %ultiple dosing of the li(uid. -unning the machine at a slo)er speed than actual production

    run.

    7overing the )or6ing shift usually 1 hours and shift 7hange

    over

    +ntry of maintenance person for repairing of %:7

    LIST OF PERMITTED

    INTERVENTIONS DURING FILLING

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    18/33

    FREQUENCY

    Initially at least ? consec&ti%e1 se#arate1 s&ccess!&l, runs on

    each line.

    -outine semi Ann&al Dualification for each ;ine .

    #ll authori!ed personnel for aseptic processing including

    technicians an( maintenance #ersonnel, should participate in a

    media fill at least once a year.

    'articipation should be consistent )ith the nature of each

    operatorJs duties during routine production.

    +ach 7hange shall be controlled through )ritten 7hangecontrol.

    7hanges and events )ith potential to effect sterility should be

    assessed through a((itional%edia Fill.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    19/33

    FREQUENCY (Cont!"

    7#9S+S OF FO- -+G#;I3#IOA OF &+

    S@S+%*

    Facility and e(uipment modifications,

    ;ine configuration changes,

    Significant changes in personnel,

    #nomalies in environmental testing results,

    7ontainer closure system changes,

    +xtended shutdo)ns,

    +nd product sterility testing sho)ing contaminated

    products.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    20/33

    MEDIA FILL RUN SI#E $ SPEED

    -un si!e should be sufficient to provide a high probability of detecting a lo$inci(ence of microbial contamination.

    # generally acceptable starting point for run si!e is in the range of =,/// to

    1/,/// units.

    For operations )ith production si!es under =,///, the number of media

    filled units should at least e(ual the maximum batch si!e made on the

    processing line. he media fill program should ade(uately address the range of line

    speeds employed during production.

    +ach media fill run should evaluate a single line speed, and the speed

    chosen should be justified.

    For example, use of high line speed is often most appropriate in theevaluation of manufacturing processes characteri!ed by fre(uent

    interventions or a significant degree of manual manipulation.

    9se of slo) line speed is generally appropriate for evaluating

    manufacturing processes )ith prolonged exposure of the sterile

    drug product and containers:closures in the aseptic area.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    21/33

    ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL

    %edia fills should be ade(uately representative of #ctual

    'rocess 7onditions

    Stressful conditions 'ermitted as per SO's shall be

    simulated."e.g., maximum number of personnel present

    and elevated activity level$, .

    7hallenges shall be supportive to the study design.

    Stressful conditions do not include artificially created

    environmental extremes, such as reconfiguration of &G#7

    systems to operate at )orst5case limits .

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    22/33

    MEDIA QUALITY 8enerally soybean casein digest medium, is used.

    #naerobic gro)th media "e.g., fluid thioglycollate medium$should be considered in special circumstances.

    %edia must 'romote promote gro)th of gram5positive, gram5

    negative bacteria, yeast and mold "e.g., 9S' indicator

    organisms$.

    +nvironmental monitorin/ an( sterilit, test isolates can besubstituted "as appropriate$ or added to the gro)th promotion

    challenge.

    8ro)th promotion units should be inoculated )ith a K1// 7F9

    challenge.

    In case of failure of 8ro)th 'romotion test the origin of any

    contamination found during the simulation should nonetheless

    be investigated and the media fill promptly repeated.

    +ach unit should be filled )ith enough (uantity and type of

    microbial gro)th medium to contact the inner container closure

    surfaces ")hen the unit is inverted or thoroughly s)irled$ and

    permit visual detection of microbial gro)th.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    23/33

    INCUBATION $ FILLED UNITS ANALYSIS

    Incubation temperature should be at no time be

    outside the range of /5?=o7.

    Incubation temperature should be maintained

    )ithin L.=o7 of the target temperature.

    Incubation time should not be less than 10 days.

    If t)o temperatures are used for the incubation

    of the media filled units, the units should be

    incubated for at least 2 days at each temperature

    "starting )ith the lo)er temperature$.

    S 2 days < /5=>7

    S 2 days < ?/5?=>7

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    24/33

    INCUBATION $ FILLED UNITS ANALYSIS

    Filled units to be inspected by Traine( sta!! onl,

    under supervision of Dualified %icrobiologist.

    +ach 'ositive unit must be brought in notice of

    D7 %icrobiologist

    Only integral units shall be incubated.

    #ll intervention units must be recorded in the

    %edia fill document separately .

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    25/33

    RESULTS $ INTERPRETATION

    Hhen filling fe)er than =/// units, no contaminate(

    &nits sho&l( .e (etecte(.

    One "1$ contaminated unit is considered cause for

    revalidation, follo)ing an investigation.

    Hhen filling from =,/// to 1/,/// units*

    One "1$ contaminated unit should result in an investigation,including consideration of a repeat media fill.

    )o "$ contaminated units are considered cause for

    revalidation, follo)ing investigation.

    Hhen filling more than 1/,/// units*

    One "1$ contaminated unit should result in an investigation. )o "$ contaminated units are considered cause for

    revalidation, follo)ing investigation.

    For any run si!e, intermittent incidents of microbial contamination in

    media filled runs can be indicative of a persistent lo)5level

    contamination problem and that should be investigated.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    26/33

    G#-I#IOAS FO-

    3IFF+-+A 3OS#8+

    FO-%S

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    27/33

    STERILE PO%DERS

    )o possible procedures* Fill the chosen inert po)der into the containers "e.g.

    ampoules:vials$ )hich are already filled )ith sterile li(uid

    medium. Fill the inert po)der first, and then add the sterile li(uid

    medium.

    7ommonly sterile '+8 /// is used as po)der .

    In both these variations, a po)der fill is simulated, but an

    additional, non5routine step "i.e. the filling of the li(uid

    gro)th medium$ is involved.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    28/33

    SUSPENSION PRODUCTS&

    Simulate the entire normal process as closely

    as possible,

    9se sterile inert po)der in place of the

    normal po)der product.%icroni!e etc. "if part of the normal process$

    and form suspension.

    9se sterile li(uid gro)th medium in place of

    the normal li(uid phase of the suspensionproduct.

    Fill as normal and incubate.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    29/33

    FREE#E-DRIED PRODUCT&

    Simulate the entire normal process i.e.

    preparation of bulk solution,

    filling of solution,

    loading of freeze-dryer, running of freeze-drying cycle,

    sealing/closing of containers,

    inspection.

    #ctual free!e5drying of the medium solution isnot practicable, but exposure, holding times in

    the free!e dryer should be as normal.

    .

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    30/33

    SEMI-SOLID PRODUCTS('!! )t'*+,' o+nt'nt) .n /*'.)"&

    Simulate the normal process cycle as

    closely as possible,Fill a sterile li(uid gro)th medium made

    to similar consistency as the normal

    product by the addition of agar

    "approximately 0 g. per liter$ orcarboxymethylcellulose

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    31/33

    DO) AND DON0T)

    Galidate %aximum number of )or6ers in the area.

    -un line at slo)er speed to give maximum exposure to

    open containers.

    3o planned interventions

    Galidate all si!es of containers specially )ith large mouth

    si!e.

    ;oading of containers and stoppers shall be an essential

    part of study.

    3on not use inert gases to in the media fill run. Insteaduse filtered air.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    32/33

    I '#@S IA &+ ;OA8 -9A

    %O-+ 7OAFI3+A7+

    -+89;#O-@ #''-OG#;S

    AO -+M+7IOA.

  • 7/26/2019 Process Simulation Test- Islamabad

    33/33

    T2AN3S