pranic agriculture research results

Pranic Agriculture

Comparative Trials fromGermany, India and Colombia

Presented by Rainer Krell

First Pranic Healing Research Conference, Bogota, Colombia 14 Sept. 2015

PRAG project scales and teams:

1. Germany - organic, commercial grainsAuthor: Stefan Riebesell

2. India - conventional horticultureAuthor: Jois N. Srikanth

3. Colombia - organic family farming, annual and perennial crops

Team: Adriano de Jesús Quintero, Alvaro Gutiérrez Lozano, Ana de Dios Castro, Arcesio Váquiro, Desined Figueroa, Leonardo Sarmiento, Rainer Krell, Roberto de Mendoza

PRAG results:

Germany Yields – kg/ha

Crop Year PRAG Demeter Difference Spelt 2011 3,840 2,000 + 92% 2012 2,340 0 *

Oats 2013 4,200 ? 2014 4,840 3,120 + 55%

Lupines 2014 3,500 2,400** + 46%

* Total crop loss due to cold, ** Average conventional yield in Bavaria


Pranic agriculture Demeter

Spelt on May 25th 2012

PRAG results:

India Tomato plant behaviourApprox. 2600 plants each per pranic and control groupFertilized on day 8 & 21 with 17-17-17 NPK; day 45 with DAPTreated on day 15 & 28 with Dimethoate

Measured Difference to Control Height + 18.5 %Stem diameter + 12.05 %Number of flowers + 31.75 %Yield in kg + 31.1 %

24% higher yield in a similar slightly smaller study in 2014


Control Group Pranic Group


0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

20

40

60

80

100

120

Height

Stem ø

Average height and stem diameter of tomato plants

cm

Visits

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

5

10

15

20

25

30


Average number of flowers per plant

Visits

#


Average yield per row of plants

kg

Visits0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRAG results:ColombiaCrops under trial: Tomato, lettuce, onions,

yuca, cacao, coffee & sugar caneIn 3 different ecological zones; Pranic treatments and observations conducted by small scale family farmers on working farms

Advers weather conditions, especially on annual crops, and Longterm crops showing no significant difference in growth yet

Preliminary observations:Level of pests on coffee appears lower Quality and concentration of sugar in pranic sugar cane appears to be better


Colombia Coffee

Yucca

Sugar cane

PRAG results:

ColombiaSugar cane harvest (100 plants of pranic and organic controls each)

Measure Pranic ControlHeight (average in cm) 234 252Internodal distance (cm) 23.6 22.3Stem diameter (cm) 3.1 3.2Total weight (kg) 142 154Syrup volume (lt) 49.5 51.5Syrup weight (kg) 56.2 51.5Panella (sugar) weight (kg) 9 9.5

Next tests: non-sugar residues and repeat trial with sugar concentration

Potential difference in quality of the end product and concentration of syrup.


Conclusions:- Productivity increases in major commodities, and horticultural crops

(for organic & conventional)- Potentially less disease and pest pressures- Measurable quality differences

- Greater income with lower costs, &- Reduced risks for organic practices

- More controlled research into factors that influence efficiency of pranic techniques


Conclusions:

Conscious pranic agriculture practice will lead to:(apart from healthier food and environment and more prosperity)

New collaborative awareness:

From I to We


ThereforeConscious pranic agriculture practice will lead to:

Economically more secure farms under most conditions

Healthier food and environment

Farmer and farm experience as connection to all:One with All

=

Food & nutrition that reconnects us, (in-)forms us


Thank you

For more information contact:

Rainer Krell - [email protected]

Stefan Riebesell – [email protected]

Jois N. Srikanth - [email protected]


mailto:[email protected]

