poznaŃ and wielkopolska region intermodal conditions · poznaŃ and wielkopolska region intermodal...

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

1

POZNAŃ AND WIELKOPOLSKA REGION INTERMODAL CONDITIONS

Instytut Logistyki i Magazynowania

Marcin Foltyński


2

AGENDA

• LOGISTICS CENTERS

• INTERMODAL TERMINALS

• MAJOR COMPANIES

• MAIN DIRECTIONS

• SUMMARY – CONCLUSIONS


3

LOGISTICS CENTERS IN POLAND

There are three logistic centres in Poland that meet Western European standards. Their location resulted from local initiatives only, and their development was not supported by the state in a systematic way. That’s why their organisations and levels of development and availability of basic logistic infrastructure components much differ.

• Śląskie Centrum Logistyki S.A. w Gliwicach,

• Euroterminal Sławków Sp. z o.o.,

• Centrum Logistyczno Inwestycyjne Poznań (CLIP Logistics Sp. z o.o.).

The existing centres neither cooperate with each other, nor undertake initiatives fort development of the national intermodal logistic network.


4

LOGISTICS CENTERS IN POLAND

Existing logistic centres

Most advanced plans of logistic centre development

Plans with no implementation structure

International transportation corridors Source: Own study – map: http:// www.pr.pkp.pl/

Existing logistic centres

Most advanced plans of logistic centre development

Plans with no implementation structure

International transportation corridors:


5

LOGISTICS CENTERS IN WLKP REGION


6 Source: Own study – map: http:// www.pr.pkp.pl/

CLIP – CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNO INWESTYCYJNE POZNAŃ

Parameter Warehouse 1 Warehouse 2

warehouse space [m2] 45 300 28 500

height of the hall at the highest point [m] 13,10 10,50

number of loading docks 24 16

number of unloading gates at level "0" 3 3

number of unloading rail gates 3 0

CLIP Group is a developer and logistics operator of

industrial - warehouse facility with a private railway siding

and an intermodal container terminal.


7

CLIP – CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNO INWESTYCYJNE POZNAŃ


8

LOGISTICS CENTER – POZNAŃ FRANOWO

Logistics Center Poznań – Franowo is planned at the 105

hectare site in south - east of Poznan. The plan is to create there

throughout the Special Economic Zone, which will provide an

incentive for potential investors. The planned location of the project

creates favorable conditions for its operation - it adheres on one

side to the express road Poznań - Katowice, on the other to the

railway tracks of distribution – transshipment station Poznań –

Franowo, where PKP Cargo is planning to build a container

terminal.


9

LOGISTICS CENTER – POZNAŃ FRANOWO


10

Wielkopolskie Centrum Logistyczne (WCL) is a zone of

intensive investment with infrastructure prepared for the

logistics company profile, importers pursuing distribution

throughout the country and platforms of supply of store chains.

WIELKOPOLSKIE CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNE - KONIN

Konin

WCL is currently only a warehouse

park but because of the planned

further development of infrastructure

and the projected growth of freight

flows in the region, intermodal

investment is considered, i.e. the

construction of a container terminal.


11

WIELKOPOLSKIE CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNE - KONIN


12

Gdynia

Warszawa

Sosnowiec

Kraków

Łódź

Swarzędz

Piotrków

Trybunalski

Gdańsk

Kutno

Gliwice

Frankfurt

Szczecin

Pruszków

Wrocław

Dąbrowa

Górnicza

Gądki

Kobylnica

Mława

Małaszewicze

Medyka

Brzeg Dolny

Kąty

Wrocławskie

Poznań

Sławków

Braniewo

Radomsko

Zamość

GądkiYear 2005 2007 2010 2011 2012

Number of

container

terminals

20 23 29 29 32

CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POLAND

Source: Own study – map: http:// www.pr.pkp.pl/


13


No Location Terminal owner

1. Gdynia BTC - Bałtycki Terminal Kontenerowy Sp. z o. o.

2. Gliwice Cargosped Sp. z o.o.

3. Kobylnica Cargosped Sp. z o.o.

4. Mława Cargosped Sp. z o.o.

5. Gądki Cargosped Sp. z o.o.

6. Warszawa Praga Cargosped Sp. z o.o.

7. Braniewo Cargosped Sp. z o.o

8. Swarzędz- Jasin Clip logistics Sp. z o. o.

9. Piotrków Trybunalski CTL Logistics Sp. z o. o.

10. Gliwice DB Schenker Rail Polska Sp. z o.o.

11. Szczecin DB Schenker Rail Polska Sp. z o.o.

12. Gdańsk DTC Gdańsk S.A.

13. Sławków Euroterminal Sławków Sp. z o.o.

14. Gdańsk Gdański Terminal Kontenerowy S.A.

15. Gdynia Gdynia Container Terminal S.A.

16. Brzeg Dolny PCC Intermodal S.A


14


No Location Terminal owner

17. Gliwice PCC Intermodal S.A

18. Frankfurt nad Odrą PCC Intermodal S.A

19. Kutno PCC Intermodal S.A

20. Małaszewicze PKP Cargo Centrum Logistyczne Małaszewicze Sp. z o.o.

21. Medyka-Żurawica PKP Cargo Centrum Logistyczne Medyka-Żurawica Sp. z o.o.

22. Dąbrowa Górnicza Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o

23. Gądki Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o

24. Pruszków Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o

25. Wrocław Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o

26. Kąty Wrocławskie Schavemaker Poland Sp. z o. o.

27. Kraków Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o.

28. Łódź Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o.

29. Sosnowiec Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o.

30. Warszawa Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o.

31. Poznań ATC Rail

32. Radomsko ATC Rail


15

CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POZNAŃ AGLOMERATION


16

CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POZNAŃ AGLOMERATION

Parameter CARGOSPED

Sp. z o.o. (Gądki)

POLZUG

Sp. z o.o.

(Gądki)

CARGOSPED

Sp. z o.o.

(Kobylnica)

CLIP Sp. z o.o.

(Swarzędz) ATC Rail

(Poznań)

SPEDCONT

Sp. z o.o. **

(Poznań)

Total area

[m2] 9 300 320 000 14 000 6 500 no data 6 200

Storage area

[m2] 1 720 no data 4 000 2 150 1 200 5 700

Daily handling capacity

[ITU*]

60

235 target 640

190 190 no data no data

Number of tracks for reloading

[pcs.]

3 4 1 1 3 3

Length of tracks for reloading

[m]

3 x 376 4 x 610 1 x 750 1 x 1190 3 x 600 3 x 150

Reloading equipment

[pcs. x payload]

1 mobile crane

Q=45 t

6 mobile cranes

Q=45 t each

1 mobile crane

Q=45 t

1 mobile crane

Q=45 t

2 moblie cranes

Q=45 t each none

* ITU - Eng. Intermodal Transport Unit (container, swap body, semitrailer appropriate for combined transport)

** Restrictions on transportation and location of the terminal right in the center cause that its status should be described as very

limited or even closed


17

KOBYLNICA – CARGOSPED


18

SWARZĘDZ – CLIP


19

GĄDKI - CARGOSPED


20

GĄDKI - POLZUG


21

POZNAŃ – ATC RAIL


22

POZNAŃ – SPEDCONT


23

CONTAINER TERMINALS MAJOR COMPANIES


24

CONTAINER TERMINALS MAIN DIRECTIONS


25

NO. Assessment parameter Weight of

parameter

Swarzędz

(CLIP)

Kobylnica

(Cargosped)

Gądki

(Polzug)

Gądki

(Cargosped)

Poznań

(ATC Rail)

Parameter

assessment Value

Parameter

assessment Value

Parameter

assessment Value

Parameter

assessment Value

Parameter

assessment Value

1 Extensive network of regular rail

connections 2 0 0 0,5 1 1 2 0 0 0,5 0

2 Equipment 2 0,5 1 0,5 1 1 2 0,5 1 0,5 1

3 Capacity of the terminal 1 0,5 0,5 0 0 1 1 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5

4

Connection with the national road

network (access to highways,

expressways, etc.)

1 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 1 1 1 1 0,5 0,5

5 Local impact on surroundings 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0,5 0,5

6 Potential for development 2 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0,5 1

7

The capacity to operate in complex

structure of networks of other

terminals

2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 0,5 1

8

The scope of offered extra services

(warehousing, washing containers,

repair, connection to the mains, etc.)

2 1 2 0,5 1 0,5 1 0,5 1 0,5 1

9 Adjusting the connection grid to the

relevant transport corridor - RBGC 2 0 0 0,5 1 1 2 0,5 1 0,5 1

10

Subjective assessment of the

possibility of establishing possible

cooperation in the RBGC project

2 0,5 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0,5 1

POINTS TOTAL – – 7 – 6,5 – 16 – 7,5 7,5

CONTAINER TERMINALS MAIN PARAMETRIC EVALUATION


26

CONCLUSIONS (1)

• increasing the attractiveness of the RBGC corridor requires integrated

actions of individual logistics centers and container terminals to create

a new product – the service offered to the global flow of goods

• Poznań agglomeration area has a well developed point infrastructure

designed to serve intermodal transport. Worth mentioning is a new

container terminal open in 2011, belonging to Polzug Intermodal acting

mainly as a hub for container traffic primarily from German sea ports

• the parametric analysis of facilities (intermodal terminal, logistics

center) located in Poznań agglomeration has shown that the container

terminal POLZUG in Gądki is recommended for further action within

work package of the project Rail Baltica Growth Corridor


27

CONCLUSIONS (2)

• the analysis also showed a lack of coordination of activities related to

planning, management and development of point intermodal

infrastructure of the whole region. In this scope, close cooperation of

representatives of regional authorities, intermodal operators and

shippers is required

• provisions in trade agreements concluded between shippers,

forwarders and intermodal operators prevented the complete

identification of freight flows through the analyzed points. Detailed

studies in this area require establishing close cooperation with

individual shippers


28

Marcin Foltyński MA

[email protected]

Thank you for your attention!

mailto:[email protected]

poznaŃ and wielkopolska region intermodal conditions · poznaŃ and wielkopolska region intermodal...

Documents