ANALYTIC RUBRIC 1

Power Point Presentation – Analytic Rubric

Table 1: ANALYTIC SCORING RUBRIC FOR POWER POINT PRESENTATION

Score Currency of

Topic

Application and

Integration of

Concepts

Organization Spelling /

Grammar / APA Originality

5

Topic is of major

discussion in

healthcare.

Project includes

all material

needed to gain a

comfortable

understanding of

the topic. Content

is

comprehensive,

accurate and

persuasive.

There is a

complete

discussion of the

treatment as

supported by the

cited literature.

Student discusses

care for this

patient based on

findings.

Application of

research

implications and

integration into

the clinical care

area thoroughly

discussed.

Information is

organized in a

clear, logical way.

It is easy to

anticipate the type

of material that

might be on the

next slide.

Transitions are

logical and

maintain the flow

of thought

throughout the

presentation.

Conclusion is

logical and flows

from the content

of the analysis.

Conclusion

includes opinions,

views, claims,

and/or

clarification.

Presentation has

no misspellings

or grammatical

errors. Rules of

grammar, usage,

and punctuation

are followed.

Language is clear

and precise;

sentences display

consistently

strong, varied

structure. Article

is less than 5

years old.

Presentation

shows

considerable

originality and

inventiveness.

The content

and ideas are

presented in a

unique and

interesting

way.

4

Topic is of

frequent

discussion in

healthcare.

Project includes

most material

needed to gain a

comfortable

understanding of

the material but is

lacking one or

two key

elements.

Few implications

of literature

discussed.

Comparisons to

patient care are

given but not

discussed

thoroughly.

There is

discussion of

application to

patient care, but

it is not

complete.

Most information

is organized in a

clear, logical way.

One slide or item

of information

seems out of

place. Transitions

are present and

conclusion is

logical.

Presentation has

1-2 misspellings,

but no

grammatical

errors. Rules of

grammar, usage,

and punctuation

are followed with

minor errors.

Article is more

than 5 years old.

Presentation

shows some

originality and

inventiveness.

The content

and ideas are

presented in

an interesting

way.

3

Topic has been

identified as a

healthcare issue.

Few comparisons

to patient care are

given. No

Some information

is logically

sequenced. An

Presentation has

1-2 grammatical

errors but no

Presentation

shows an

attempt at

ANALYTIC RUBRIC 2

Project is missing

more than two

key elements.

nursing

implications of

research are

discussed.

Student does not

point out how

improvements

may or may not

be made or

support current

practice.

occasional slide or

item of

information seems

out of place.

Conclusion is

unclear and not

summative.

misspellings.

Rules of spelling,

usage, and

punctuation are

followed with

minor errors.

Article is more

than 5 years old.

originality and

inventiveness

on 1-2 slides.

2

Topic is of little

relevance to

healthcare

Project is lacking

several key

elements and has

inaccuracies that

make it a poor

guide for

scholarly

research

Practice

implications are

highlighted, but

no comparison is

given. Student

does not integrate

findings into

clinical scenario.

There is no clear

plan for the

organization of

information.

Conclusion is

missing, or if

provided does not

flow from the

body of the

presentation.

Presentation has

more than 2

grammatical

and/or spelling

errors. Language

lacks clarity or

includes the use

of some jargon or

conversational

tone. Article is

not research

based or peer-

reviewed

Presentation is

a rehash of

other people's

ideas and/or

graphics and

shows very

little attempt

at original

thought.

1

Topic is of little

relevance to

healthcare.

Project includes

no key elements

to assignment

and several

opinions of the

student.

Little to no

implications are

given or

discussed. Few

comparisons are

made.

Discussion is

irrelevant to

topic. Treatment

support by

literature is weak.

Organization and

structure detract

from the message.

Paragraphs are

disjointed and

lack transition of

thoughts.

Elements of

content are

missing.

Presentation

lacks many

elements of

correct

formatting. No

in text citation

provided

Presentation

contains

numerous

grammatical,

punctuation, and

spelling errors.

Language uses

jargon or

conversational

tone. Article is

not reliable or

peer reviewed.

Presentation is

stark and

shows no

effort at

creativity or

originality.

0

Topic is not

relevant to

healthcare.

No integration to

clinical practice

or application to

nursing care is

given.

Presentation not

organized.

Presentation

follows no

scholarly context.

Presentation is

plagiarized.

ANALYTIC RUBRIC 3

References

Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (2009). Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric. Retrieved

from Insight Assessment: www.insightassessment.com

Feingold, C. E., Calaluce, M., & Kallen, M. A. (2004). Computerized patient model and

simulated clinical experiences: Evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. Journal

of Nurse Education , 43, 156-163.

Hueckel, R., & Wilson, D. (2007). The child with respiratory dysfunction. In M. J. Hockenberry,

& D. Wilson, Wong's nursing care of infants and children (8th ed., pp. 1314-1386). Saint

Louis, MO: Elsevier.

King, J. E. (2004). Blunt abdominal trauma. In S. D. Melander, Caes studies in critical care

nursing: a guide for application and review (3rd ed., pp. 430-445). Saint Louis, MO:

Elsevier.

Landis, M., Swain, K. D., Friehe, M. J., & Coufal, K. L. (2007). Evaluating critical thinking in

class and online: Comparison of the Newman Method and the Facione Rubric.

Communication Disordes Quarterly , 28 (3), 135-143.

Linn, R., & Grounlund, N. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Upper Saddle

River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

M, K. J., & DeWitt, D. A. (2009). Strategies for assessing/evaluating learning outcomes. In D.

M. Billings, & J. A. Halstead, Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (3rd ed., pp. 409-

428). Saint Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Mertler, C. A. (2003). Classroom assessment. Los Angeles: Pyrczak.

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurment and assessment in teaching

(10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

ANALYTIC RUBRIC 4

Oermann, M. H., & Gaberson, K. B. (2009). Evaluation and testing in nursing education (3rd

ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

Walsh, C. R. (2004). Diabetic ketoacidosis. In S. D. Melander, Case studies in critical care

nursing: a guide for application and review (3rd ed., pp. 337-350). Saint Louis, MO:

Elsevier.