portfolio - inspirations play.docx

2
Assignment/Activity Title— Inspirations Play Year— Freshman Skill— Public Performance, Group Dynamics Portfolio Category— Social Awareness In the process of brainstorming and writing our script for the Inspirations play I assumed the role of leadership. As I assumed this status I found myself continuously telling my group to focus and how we should go about brainstorming and deciding what happened next in the play. In general we would share our ideas in the group and see which one we liked the most based on; interest in the topic, hilarity of possible scenarios, and how we could fit our 6-person group into a script surrounding the topic. We finally decided on the broad topic of NASA. We agreed on the subject because we knew it would be relatively easy to incorporate the 6 of us as astronauts, scientists, or professors. I then explained to the group that we needed to narrow down the subject of NASA so we could focus on something in the 10 minutes of stage time that we had. This was where things got dicey. It took us almost an entire class to decide on the theme of whether NASA’s funding was sufficient or if we should stop or diminish the funding that goes to NASA. Almost every person in the group wanted to perform the play on a different aspect of NASA. One thing we could agree on was the play had to incorporate space exploration. As the leader of the group I took it upon myself to get our group past this stage of preproduction. I sacrificed my idea so that we had at least one person to second an idea. However before I could go with one idea, another person in my group gave up their idea. At this point we were left with four ideas and two unbiased voters. I explained that we had to limit the options to two. We finally eliminated the other options and voted on the funding option. The next class we had the task of starting, the most difficult part of scriptwriting. I knew if we didn’t have some outline of a plot there was no way we could just start writing, so I explained to the group that we had to brainstorm the general plot. There was less disagreement on this aspect and I led the group through it in one class. We spent the next week debating what to say and when to incorporate information we got from interviews with NASA employees.

Upload: john-carter

Post on 10-Nov-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Assignment/Activity Title Inspirations Play Year FreshmanSkill Public Performance, Group DynamicsPortfolio Category Social Awareness

In the process of brainstorming and writing our script for the Inspirations play I assumed the role of leadership. As I assumed this status I found myself continuously telling my group to focus and how we should go about brainstorming and deciding what happened next in the play. In general we would share our ideas in the group and see which one we liked the most based on; interest in the topic, hilarity of possible scenarios, and how we could fit our 6-person group into a script surrounding the topic. We finally decided on the broad topic of NASA. We agreed on the subject because we knew it would be relatively easy to incorporate the 6 of us as astronauts, scientists, or professors. I then explained to the group that we needed to narrow down the subject of NASA so we could focus on something in the 10 minutes of stage time that we had. This was where things got dicey. It took us almost an entire class to decide on the theme of whether NASAs funding was sufficient or if we should stop or diminish the funding that goes to NASA. Almost every person in the group wanted to perform the play on a different aspect of NASA. One thing we could agree on was the play had to incorporate space exploration. As the leader of the group I took it upon myself to get our group past this stage of preproduction. I sacrificed my idea so that we had at least one person to second an idea. However before I could go with one idea, another person in my group gave up their idea. At this point we were left with four ideas and two unbiased voters. I explained that we had to limit the options to two. We finally eliminated the other options and voted on the funding option. The next class we had the task of starting, the most difficult part of scriptwriting. I knew if we didnt have some outline of a plot there was no way we could just start writing, so I explained to the group that we had to brainstorm the general plot. There was less disagreement on this aspect and I led the group through it in one class. We spent the next week debating what to say and when to incorporate information we got from interviews with NASA employees. This portion of the process required the least supervision, each group member participated in equal amounts. From a leaders perspective starting the script was surprisingly not the hardest part, I found getting an original idea for our script was the most difficult. I had to organize everyone and choose between many applicable ideas based on an array of categories. Unfortunately the fact that we will perform the play in front of the class biased my decisions throughout the process. I, along with the majority of my group, would rather not perform the play. If a scene that was considered embarrassing was put forth and it was not necessary to the plot, I would speak for the majority and shoot it down. This weeding out changed the course of our play, not making it any better or worse. If we were more comfortable on stage our play wouldve turned out a significantly different way.

Student SignatureDate

Teacher SignatureDate