1. Why Porsche Cayenne ?

2. Porsche Cayenne Vs.Q7 M ClassEvoque Sport 3. Match # 1Porsche Cayenne Mercedes-Benz M-ClassVs. 4. US News RatingsMercedes-Benz M-ClassWinnerOverall 8.27.6Critics Rating 8.17.6Performance 8.46.8Interior8.27.2Reliability 3.53.5 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632 5. Specs Comparison Mercedes-Benz M-Class ManualTransmission Automatic *Automatic OptionalDrivetrain All Wheel Drive Rear Wheel DriveFuel/EngineGas V6 3.6L/220 Gas V6 3.5L/213MPG15 City / 22 Hwy18 City / 23 Hwy 6. Price CheckPorsche Cayenne & Mercedes-Benz M-Class PKR 17,941,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/porsche/porsche-~1.65 Curor cayenne-cayenne-s-detail.html 7. Transmission Mercedes-Benz M-Class* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode7-Speed AutomaticManual6-Speed Manual 8. What Customers have to say !!! Mercedes-Benz M-Class Conservative exterior COMAND interface Indecisive shifts (Bluetec) Cons: "Annoying ergonomics, balky transmission." Cons: "Bit pricey, laggy acceleration, not as sporty" Cons: "HID lights should be standard." Cons: "Terrible Bluetooth phone quality" Cons: "Coolant leaked 4 times...bought is brand new 2 months ago :("http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/mercedes-benz_m-class_2013 9. Users Comment #1Mercedes-Benz M-Class The worst vehicle I ever own. By neversummer78 on 10/04/12 16:14 PM (PDT) Vehicle 2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML350 BlueTEC 4dr SUV AWD (3.0L 6cyl Turbodiesel 7A) Review I purchased my 2012 ML350 Bluetec back in November 2011. After 2 weeks, the first problem I had was car was pulling to the right at highway speed. After left it with the dealer for about a week, they finally realized that it was bad tire which took them a few more days to get replacement. Next, I was having problem with car loosing power when driving over a long distance or for a few hours. There is no error message on the dashboard nor that the dealer can replicate. Anyway, I start documenting them on video using my phone. They finally acknowledge but still no solution for it. Along with the car loosing power, I was getting error with PRE-SAFE Inoperative error and Ad-Blue low levelhttp://www.kbb.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class/ml350-consumer_reviews/?vehicleid=379345&intent=buy-new&p=1&perpage=5&sort=0&r=179227532018904960 10. Users Comment # 2Mercedes-Benz M-ClassLook elsewhere.....Mercedes has lost its edgeBy mabcpa1 on 01/04/12 19:01 PM (PST)Vehicle2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML350 4MATIC 4dr SUV AWD (3.5L 6cyl7A)ReviewRecently leased the new 2012 ML 350 and what a disappointment.Interior fit and finish not up to usual Mercedes quality and requiredreplacement parts.....on a new Mercedes. Ride is terrible. There is aproblem with the rear suspension that makes this car bounce like crazyover any little road bump and the dealer claims there is nothing wrong.The precise handling I have read about in other reviews of this car iscompletely lacking in the car I got......my Honda minivan drove withless effort!!! I am so sorry I got this car and especially at over $700 permonth for the lease. The BMW X5 drives much, much better. Maybe Ishould just go back to my Honda!!!http://www.kbb.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class/ml350-consumer_reviews/?vehicleid=379345&intent=buy-new&p=1&perpage=5&sort=0&r=179227532018904960 11. Users Comment #3 Mercedes-Benz M-ClassBenz if you think I made this up, contact me!by Quocnamon 10/20/12ConsCoolant leaked 4 times...bought it brand new 2 months ago :(Purchased As NewGreat looking car, great interior, been in the service department 4 times within thepast 2 months to rell the coolant....now they want to take the car apart to gureout this coolant situation...oh and the engine knocks now...we are hesitant now toeven think about taking it out of town. First time buying a benz, and realizedsomething everybody should know bf buying one: "if you are going to buy a benz, donot use it for road trips, city driving only...get rid of it before warranty expired" 12. Users Comment #4Mercedes-Benz M-Classnot reliable carby alex limon 03/29/12Purchased As NewNot very reliable car. A month after purchase, the car does not start at ashopping center. So called emergency service person, he could not start the careither. He said something is wrong with a key. So I had to bring a extra key fromhome to start the car. About 2 months later, the car had fuel injection problems.So it stayed in MB service center for 10 days for repair. Few weeks after I got mycar back, while driving, the car had another engine problem and stopped in themiddle of road. It was towed to MB service center for 14 days for another repair.This car was in MB service center for over 3 weeks since I had it for 4 months. 13. Users Comment #5 Mercedes-Benz M-ClassMercedes Should Be Ashamed..............By glacierdon on 06/01/09 10:05 AM (PDT)Vehicle2000 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML430 4dr SUV AWDReviewIts apparent that the 2000 ML 430 is a lemon. I have gone on various sites andpeople from all over are having the same exact problems. The windows wontroll down, the doors wont lock, the brakes always need replacing, the exteriorlights are always blowing, the power steering went out, the sun roof gets stuck,the interior is coming apart, and now when I stop at lights it cuts off and wontstart for about 30 to 40 minutes. this happens at least once a week. From myunderstanding these vehicles were built in the U.S. If I wanted an American car Iwould have bought a Ford. Mercedes should do a recall on these vehicles. Therepairs needed on the vehicle are more than its worth. Seriously!http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2000/consumer-reviews/mercedes-should-be-ashamed...............html?style=17814&sub=&reviewId=5112c6a538e7829e0275f16a 14. Research Sources Used for Review Mercedes-Benz M-Class AutoWeek http://www.autoweek.com/article/20110713/CARREVIEWS/110719946 Consumer Guide http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class-1.htm EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ndacar.shtml EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=32846&id=33279&id=32851 Inside Line http://www.insideline.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2012/2012-mercedes-benz-ml350-rst-drive.html Kelley Blue Book http://www.kbb.com/mercedes-benz/m-class/2013-mercedes-benz-m-class/ml350-expert_car_reviews/?vehicl... Manufacturer Warranty http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/service_and_parts/warranty Motor Trend http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1201_2013_mercedes_benz_ml63_amg_rst_drive/ powertrain warranty https://secure.drivers.lexus.com/lexusdrivers/info/my-lexus/service/warranty.do 15. Match # 2Porsche Cayenne Audi Q 7Vs. 16. US News Ratings Audi Q 7WinnerOverall 8.27.7Critics Rating 8.17.8Performance 8.47.3Interior8.26.8Reliability 3.53.0 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632 17. Specs ComparisonAudi Q 7 ManualTransmission Automatic *Automatic OptionalDrivetrain All Wheel Drive All Wheel Drive Supercharged Gas V6 3.0L/Fuel/EngineGas V6 3.6L/220 183MPG15 City / 22 Hwy16 City / 22 Hwy 18. Price CheckPorsche Cayenne & Audi Q7 PKR 17,941,400 PKR 13,000,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/porsche/porsche- http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/audi/audi-q7-q7- cayenne-cayenne-s-detail.htmldetail.htmlhttp://www.audi.com.pk/sea/brand/pk/models/q7.html 19. TransmissionAudi Q 7* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode8-Speed Automatic Manual6-Speed Manual 20. What Customers have to say !!! Audi Q 7 Gas mileage isnt great with the supercharged V-6 Its heavy, and feels like it Prices can rise quickly with optionsCons: "Brake job at 50,000 miles was expensive"Cons: "Repair cost are high without warranty"Cons: "Small 3rd Row Seating, Gas Guzzler"Cons: "noisy, quirky, slow, poor quality, high maint cost" http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/audi_q7_2013 21. Users Comment # 1Audi Q 7I would chose another modelBy Jpat0973 (OH) on Friday, August 24, 2012"To put it nicely, I would choose a different vehicle. I owned this car for a year and was astounded at thetechnical, engineering, quality and performance deficiencies in this car. The ride quality was below what Iwould expect for an entry level SUV. Every crack or ripple in the pavement could shake a filling out of yourteeth. I get "sport" suspension- this was something else. Every seem, seat joint and panel in the interiorrattled when you hit a bump- which obviously was often. The MMI system controls are clumsy and far tooattention grabbing to be safe. They are also located directly in front of the cupholders yet have no gusseting toprevent the smallest of spills to fry the entire MMI system that runs every feature inread morehttp://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/ 22. Users Comment # 2 Audi Q 7 Lemon By Psalsa (Irvine,ca) on Friday, April 13, 2007 2.0 overall rating 2 of 10rating details Reviewer Ratings "I bought the car almost two months ago.It has been at the dealers for repair three times total of more than 20 days.Still at the dealer.Piece of a junk.I would never recommend it." http://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/ 23. Audi Q7"Its looking a bit dated now,.................................................... The maindemerits are sub-par cargo space and 3rd-row room, and interior trimthat doesnt quite live up to the high standards weve come to expectfrom an Audi." -- Consumer Guide http://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/ 24. Audi Q7Mediocre fuel economy with 3.0T, surprisingly small third row and cargo bay, agingand needlessly heavy underpinnings. - AutoTrader Reviewhttp://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/ 25. Research Sources Used for ReviewAudi Q 7Autobloghttp://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/27/rst-drive-2011-audi-q7-downsizes-with-an-upside/Automobile Magazinehttp://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/driven/1005_2011_audi_q7/index.htmlCar and Driverhttp://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/10q2/2011_audi_q7_3.0t_supercharged-rst_drive_reviewCar and Driverhttp://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/11q1/acura_mdx_vs._audi_q7_3.0t_bmw_x5_xdrive35i_lan...Consumer Guidehttp://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2013-audi-q7-1.htmEdmundshttp://www.edmunds.com/audi/q7/2013Kelley Blue Bookhttp://www.kbb.com/audi/q7/2013-audi-q7/Manufacturer Warrantyhttp://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/owners/benets.html#source=http://www.audiusa.com/us/brand/en/ow...Motor Trendhttp://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1005_2011_audi_q7_3_0t_rst_drive/index.html 26. Match # 3Porsche Cayenne Turbo Range Rover SportVs. 27. US News RatingsPorsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover SportWinnerOverall 8.27.8Critics Rating 8.17.9Performance 8.48.2Interior8.28.0Reliability 3.53.0 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632 28. Specs Comparison Porsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover SportTransmission AutomaticAutomaticDrivetrain All Wheel DriveFour Wheel Drive Turbocharged Gas V8Fuel/Engine Gas V8 5.0L/305 4.8L/293MPG15 City / 22 Hwy 13 City / 18 Hwy 29. Price CheckPorsche Cayenne Turbo & Range Rover Sport PKR 29,035,500Cost~2.35 Curor * Pakwheels.com 30. TransmissionRange Rover SportAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode6-Speed Automatic Manual8-Speed Automatic 31. What Customers have to say !!! Range Rover Sport Ride can be harsh Low, low gas mileage Small cargo area, tight knee room"It remains massively heavy and the fuel economy is woeful, but its still a joy to drive and ride in." -- Car and Driver"Despite its elaborate technology, our Range Rover Sport underwhelmed in snow." -- Cars.com (2012)Cons: "Poor quality of the car and of service, it breaks!"Cons: "no voice command for this year model."Cons: "poor gas and bulky"http://www.thecarconnection.com/review/1076225_2013-land-rover-range-rover-sport_green_7 32. Users Comment # 1 Range Rover SportI was told It had Quality Issues - They wererightBy eduwad (FL) on Friday, August 10, 2012"I purchased this Range Sport HSE, although I was told that Land Rovers had Quality Issues.The car is so beautifull and drives so well that I could not resist it! What a Mistake! I keephaving quality issues on: the bearings, the dashboard clock, the parking brake, now its thesteering.... What next??? It is a shame, since the car is great, but I am terribly sorry for mypurchase decision." 33. Users Comment # 2 Range Rover SportPOOR GAS MILAGEBy rovingtiger (HI) on Thursday, March 22, 2012I own this car - My approximate mileage is 42,300"looks good on the outside, it is more of a status symbol and not aperformance or dependability type vehicle. The automatic height sensorswent out at 41000 miles without any warning. Thankfully, it was still onwarranty otherwise, I would of payed $2000 . This vehicle can be fun butthe interior seems to be bulky, cumbersome and is more size thansubstance. I believe there are beter vehiclesof this nature out there like the2012-13 Ford explore with equal or better bells and whistles. Ohh andbetter gas milage without having to feed it premium fuel. good luck tothose seeking this vehicle." 34. Users Comment # 3 Range Rover SportNo TrustBy Gary on 04/02/10 21:34 PM (PDT)Vehicle2010 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE 4dr SUV 4WD (5.0L 8cyl 6A)ReviewThis SUV has left my wife locked out three times. I have driven with out turn signals andthe mirrors turned in parking position. No air conditioning, no Navigation no radio and hasspent 20 plus days in the shop in less then 5000 miles. The windows dont always close andit may not nd the "smart key for 30 minutes which means it wont start until it does butthe alarm is sounding for the duration. We know any drive is our last but if we dont getkilled by the police because they think we are stealing it, some bad people will kill us whilewe wait for the "smart key" the alerts them easy prey. My favorite was a scary guy askingmy wife if she needs help in a Fort Lauderdale garage at night. 35. Research Sources Used for Review Range Rover Sport Car and Driver http://buyersguide.caranddriver.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013/land-rover-range-rover-sport Cars.com http://www.cars.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013/expert-reviews/ Cars.com http://www.cars.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2012/expert-reviews/ Consumer Guide http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2012-land-rover-range-rover-sport.htm EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&path=1&year1=2013&year2=2013... Edmunds http://www.edmunds.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013/ Kelley Blue Book http://www.kbb.com/land-rover/range-rover-sport/2013-land-rover-range-rover-sport/?r=242126950201013... Manufacturer Warranty http://www.landrover.com/us/en/rr/owners/care-and-maintenance/limited-warranty/ 36. Match # 4Porsche Cayenne Range Rover EvoqueVs. 37. US News Ratings Range Rover EvoqueWinnerOverall 8.28.1Critics Rating 8.18.7Performance 8.48.2Interior8.26.5Reliability 3.52.5 http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/compare/?trims=12166-353526_12200-354916_12152-353632 38. Specs Comparison Range Rover Evoque ManualTransmissionAutomatic *Automatic OptionalDrivetrain All Wheel DriveAll Wheel DriveTurbocharged Gas I4 2.0L/Fuel/EngineGas V6 3.6L/220122MPG15 City / 22 Hwy 18 City / 28 Hwy 39. Price CheckPorsche Cayenne &Range Rover Evoque PKR 17,941,400Cost http://www.gari.com.pk/cars/porsche/porsche-~ PKR 1.30 Curor cayenne-cayenne-s-detail.html 40. TransmissionRange Rover Evoque* Porsche Cayenne has an option for AutomaticAutomaticAutomatic Transmission w/Manual Mode6-Speed AutomaticManual6-Speed Manual 41. What Customers have to say !!! Range Rover Evoque Sporty SUV still a logic trap Pricey, even for a Euro ute Turbo fours gristly noisesCons: "Everything else"Cons: "New model bugs, could use more storage"Cons: "Interior not as luxurious for the money"Cons: "Limited storage when back seats are not folded."http://www.thecarconnection.com/overview/land-rover_range-rover-evoque_2013 42. Users Comment # 1Range Rover EvoqueWorst carBy eEK (IL) on Thursday, February 07, 2013I own this car - My approximate mileage is 1,125"Bought car January 2. Towed after 1 week. All warning lights came on nopower steering, car would not shift to another gear. Everything. Took oneweek to repair. Module replaced. Smart keys stopped working this week.Called everyone to complain. Called first time and this time also. Said I havewarranty and they stand behind. No help. Poor service to make sure car onemonth old repaired. I have owned 20 cars from for focus to Infiniti and this isthe worst. Car towed again today." 43. Users Comment # 2 Range Rover Evoque Disappointed By Auntie (MA) on Wednesday, November 21, 2012 I own this car - My approximate mileage is 5,500 "I am disappointed with my Evoque. I have had it 4 months and it has been back to the dealer twice within two weeks. It has 5,500 miles but now I am having issues with the tires and coolant. When the temperature drops more than 10 degrees, the tires lose air and the sensor light comes on. The dealer has had to fill the tires twice so far. The next thing that just happened was the coolant light came on. Brought it in again and it needed coolant. Dealer said to expect to bring it back a few more times. For the money I paid, I am disgusted and thinking of trading it already. Now I am thinking I should have gotten the Infinit FX35 or FX50 or the Lexus." 44. Users Comment # 3Range Rover EvoqueGarbage car , very poor customer service by vick on 04/11/12Consits a land roverPurchased As NewBiggest piece of garbage, never buy a landrover!!!! the worst brand ever. verypoor customer service. run run fast and dont look back. very poor reliability 45. Users Comment # 4Range Rover EvoqueWaste of Money by Ricky on 10/13/2012.Trim: 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure Plus 5-Door.Cons:Everything else. Temperamental, seatbelt in front hard to insert, driver window to high forATM or drive up. Towed 2 times and have had one month.Overall review:Bought car January 2. Towed one week later. Took one week to replace module. Called landrover and did receive $500 in land rover certicates. This week both smart keys stoppedworking. Made appt. to repair and called land rover. Said I have warranty and certicatesone time. Not helpful or willing to go extra mile to help with car repair. Today car wouldnot start and car towed again. Land Rover has terrible service and pretty much yourproblem even if car 1 month old. I regret the purchase of this car. 46. Research Sources Used for Review Range Rover Evoque See the full 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque specs http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Land-Rover_Range-Rover-Evoque/2013/specs/ AutoWeek http://www.autoweek.com/article/20110411/CARNEWS/110419992 Car and Driver http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/11q3/2012_land_rover_range_rover_evoque-rst_drive_review Consumer Guide http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2012-land-rover-range-rover-evoque-1.htm EPA http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33333 EPA http://fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33333 Edmunds http://www.edmunds.com/land-rover/range-rover-evoque/2012/ Kelley Blue Book http://www.kbb.com/land-rover/range-rover-evoque/2013-land-rover-range-rover-evoque/ Manufacturer Warranty http://www.landrover.com/us/en/lr/owners/care-and-maintenance/limited-warranty/ Motor Trend http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1108_2012_land_rover_range_rover_evoque_test/viewall.html Motor Trend http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1104_2012_land_rover_range_rover_evoque_drive/index.html Popular Mechanics http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/reviews/drives/2012-range-rover-evoque-test-drive Road and Track http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/drives/2012-land-rover-range-rover-evoque