polk transportation planning organization 2035 mobility vision plan july 2010 steering committee -...

Polk Transportation Planning Organization2035 Mobility Vision Plan

July 2010

July 2010

Steering Committee - January 28, 2010


Polk Transportation Planning OrganizationPolk Transportation Planning Organization


July 2010

Topics

• Project Prioritization

• Transit

• Highways

• Non-Motorized Facilities

• Financial Resources

• Public Outreach

• Schedule


July 2010

Transit Prioritization


July 2010

Eight Scoring Criteria address:

•Previous Planning Efforts (2060

TVP, PTA Expansion Plan)

•Regional Connectivity and

Accessibility (Transit

Centers/Park and Ride Lots)

•Demographic and Socio-

Economic Indicators (Transit

Potential Areas)

•Urban Form and Planned Growth

(TSDA, TCCO)

•Public Input

Transit Evaluation Criteria & Scoring


July 2010


July 2010

Additional Considerations

• PTA Plan represents first five years of cost affordable transit improvements

• Subsequent phasing will be based on project ranking with the following considerations emphasized:

– Anticipated route productivity (ridership)

– Available projected revenues

– Public input

– Timing of growth – implement improvements in growth areas concurrent with anticipated development


July 2010

Highway Prioritization


July 2010

State Intermodal System (SIS) Cost-Feasible Projects in Polk County

Road From To Improvement Type

Phase Cost (YOE $M)

Period

US 98 Manor Dr CR 540-A Widen to 6L Const 30.707 2015-2019

US 27 N of SR 540 N of SR 542

Widen to 6L Const 25.485 2015-2019

US 98 CR 540A SR 540 Widen to 6L Const 69.825 2020-2025

US 27 Richie Rd Barry Rd Widen to 6L ROW & Const

89.487 2020-2025

US 27 Barry Rd Lake Co Line

Widen to 6L ROW & Const

148.006 2031-2035

Source: SIS Long Range Capacity Plan (Approved 2009)


July 2010

Highway Project Prioritization – Non-SIS Roads

Based on Approved 2035 Goals & Objectives

• Multi-Modal System Development

• Environmental Sustainability

• Regional Support

• Freight & Goods Movement

• Efficiency & Interconnectivity

• Safety & Security

• Public Input


July 2010

Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)• Candidate projects evaluated by whether they

would:

– Complete or fill gap(s) in system

– Connect directly to desired destinations or facilities

– Be within specific designated areas

– Address problems or enhance designated facilities

– Satisfy need(s) expressed by public to date

Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)

Project Completes:

Sidewalk Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1

Sidewalk Gap Fills Sidewalk Facility Gap/Need = Y 1

Bicycle Top 100 In Top 100 = Y 1

Bicycle Facility Gap Fills Bicycle Facility Gap/Need = Y 1

Project Connects Directly to:

Airport Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Park & Ride Lot Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Transit Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Regional Intermodal Hub Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Regional Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Freight Activity Center Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

High Speed Rail Station Y=Direct Connection/Access 1

Project is Within:

Environmental Justice (EJ) Area F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None

F=2, P=1, N=0

Multimodal LOS District District I, II or III III=3, II=2, I=1

Transit Supportive Development Area

F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None

F=2, P=1, N=0

Transit Corridors and Centers Overlay

F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None

F=2, P=1, N=0

100-Year Flood Hazard Area H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low

H=0, M=1, L=2

ETDM Environmental Screening Tool Analysis:

Potential Cumulative Degree of Effect

H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low (see EST Results tab)

H=0, M=1, L=2

Project Evaluation Criterion Assessment Scoring (Points)

Project Enhances or Improves:

Evacuation Route Y = Evac Route 1Regional Road Network Y = on Regional Network 1Regional Transit Route Y = Serves regional or inter-county

transit route1

Strategic Intermodal System Facility Y = on SIS 1

Major Truck Route Y = on Truck Route 1Major Road Network Connectivity Y = Makes New Connection between

Major Roads1

Current Congestion LOS D; LOS E; LOS F; all others = A-C (based on 5 yr LOS)

F=5, E=3, D=1, A-C=0

Future Congestion Volume to Capacity Ratio (based on 2035 E+C Network V/C)

>1.50 = 5, 1.25 to 1.50 = 3, 1.00 to

1.24 = 1, <1.00 = 0

Safety Top 50 Crash Locations (2005 - 2009) # = Number of Locations

intersected by project

Public Involvement:

Public Input on Project Public comments received on facility or corridor (as of April 2010)

# = Number of times cited as need

in surveys

Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology


July 2010

Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology (Cont’d.)•Environmental Screening GIS Tool Used to Evaluate Potential Degree of Effect on Natural & Man-Made Environment•Analyzed project impact within 500’ buffer•Scores based on # of features found or % of buffer area falling within:

Wetland Areas Recreational Areas

Wildlife & Habitat Areas Prime Farmlands

Flood Hazard Areas Historic/Arch. Sites

Special Areas (e.g. Green Swamp Contaminated Sites


July 2010

2030 TRIP 2035 MVP

Criteria Relative Weight Criteria Relative Weight

Existing Congestion

12.5% Efficiency & Interconnectivity

20%

Future Congestion 12.5%

Freight/Economic Competitiveness

20% Freight & Goods Movement

15%

Community Impacts

10% Multi-Modal System Dev.

15%

Environmental Impacts

10% Environmental Sustainability

20%

Safety 20% Safety & Security 20%

Project Status 10% Regional Support 5%

Short-Term Need 5% Public Input 5%

Total 100% Total 100%


July 2010

Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d)

•Relative Weight (%) assigned to each category divided by maximum points for that category to arrive at weighted scores

•Ranking based on weighted scores

•Ranked project list divided into Tiers I, II and III


July 2010


July 2010

Non-Motorized Prioritization


July 2010

PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST

5 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,560,461.30

9 US 17/92 (SEVENTEENTH ST)* HINSON AVE CR 547 $126,970.00

19 US 98* EDGEWOOD DR LAKE PARKER AVE $379,640.30

20 US 98* SR 540 EDGEWOOD DR $355,516.00

22 US 98* LYLE PKWY CR 540A $812,608.00

35 SR 546 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* I-4 WABASH AVE $609,456.00

36 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $634,850.00

39 US 17/92 (HINSON AVE)* US 27 10TH ST $153,633.70

40 US 27* SR 60 TOWERVIEW BLVD $761,820.00

44 US 92/98 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* LAKE PARKER AVENUE SR 659 $589,140.80

51 US 98* CR 540A SR 540 $961,162.90

52 SR 542* CARL FLOYD RD US 27 $711,032.00

54 SR 542 (CENTRAL AVE)* 14TH ST CARL FLOYD RD $457,092.00

55 SR 35 (BARTOW RD)* LAKE PARKER AVE S MAIN ST $152,364.00

70 SR 60* CR 655 US 27 $2,056,914.00

75 US 17/92* ROCHELLE AVE US 27 $1,409,367.00

87 US 92* SR 659 SR 655 $1,498,246.00

88 US 98* DAUGHTERY RD CR 35A $1,485,549.00

95 US 17* SR 60A CONNECTOR SPIRIT LAKE RD $1,193,518.00

$15,909,341.00

Cumulative Total for Top 100 Sidewalk Projects $51,750,305.63

Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $15,909,341.00

$35,840,964.63


July 2010

PRIORITY ROAD FROM TO COST

3 CR 557* US 17/92 I-4 $1,721,239.98

24 WABASH AVE S* ARIANA ST US 92 $284,656.38

25 US 17 (FIFTH ST)* CRYSTAL BEACH RD GILBERT ST $473,540.52

34 US 17/92 (LAKE SHORE WAY)* COLUMBIA ST ROCHELLE AVE $170,261.76

35 US 92 (WABASH AVE)* GEORGE JENKINS BLVD SR 546 $242,090.94

39 US 92/98 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* FLORIDA AVE LAKE PARKER AVE $268,694.34

49 SR 544 (AVE T NW)* US 17 1ST ST NW $133,017.00

50 US 17/92 (HINSON AVE)* US 27 10TH ST $327,221.82

55 US 17 (SIXTH ST NW)* 6TH ST SW @ AVE A SW SR 544 $465,559.50

64 CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)* US 92 10TH ST $675,726.36

85 SR 60 (HESPERIDES RD)* US 27 SR 17 $316,580.46

88 US 92/98 (MEMORIAL BLVD)* LAKE PARKER AVENUE SR 659 $569,312.76

99 SR 37* ALAFIA RIVER (NORTH PRONG) SR 60 $106,413.60

$5,754,315.42

Cumulative Total for Top 100 Bike Projects $39,960,967.14

Less Projects Included in Highway Needs $5,754,315.42

$34,206,651.72


July 2010

Other Arterials (State & Fed.), $423

Enhancement Funds (Fed.), $12

TRIP, $30

Local Ad Val Tax, $650

Local Op. Gas Tax, $117

Impact Dist A, $17

Impact Dist B, $57

Impact Dist C, $76

Impact Dist D, $58

Impact Dist E, $79

Highway Funding Forecast by Source($M, 2015 - 2035)

Total Funding = $1,668 MTotal Project Cost Est. = $6,946 M

Difference = ($5,278 M)

DRAFT


July 2010

Federal Cash Grants, $210

State Cash Grants, $79Federal

Discretionary Grants, $28

State Service Development

Grants, $7

Passenger Fares, $40

Proposed Local Tax, $892

Transit Funding Forecast(2015 - 2035, $M) Total Funding = $892 M

Total Capital Cost Est. = $2,004 MTotal Operating Cost Est.* = $998 M

Difference = ($2,110 M)

* Assumes constant rate of growth in service & rail service starting in 2035

DRAFT


July 2010

Next Steps:• Finalize project evaluation & rankings (still

draft at this point)• Assign funding sources to candidate

projects to determine cost feasibility• Break large projects into smaller segments• Confirm funding assumptions• Obtain and consider public input on project

priorities


July 2010

Public Involvement – Outreach

Website - www.2035mobilityvisionplan.org

Public Workshops

August/September

West, Central and East/Ridge

Updated Newsletter

Specific input on projects in the Plan


July 2010

Project ScheduleSept

2009

Dec Mar

2010

June Sept Dec 2010

2011

Draft GOPs

Draft Needs Plan

Project Eval./Priorities

Draft Cost Feasible Plan

TPO Approves Draft

Community Workshops

TPO Adoption

Final MVP Document

July 2010July 2010


July 2010

Questions / Comments Review & Concur with Project

Prioritization

polk transportation planning organization 2035 mobility vision plan july 2010 steering committee -...

Documents

transit prioritization

date slide

highway prioritization

anticipated development

previous planning efforts

sis long range capacity

project ranking

period us