Plant Pathogens in Irrigation Water: Challenges and Opportunities

Download Plant Pathogens in Irrigation Water: Challenges and Opportunities

Post on 23-Feb-2017

218 views

Category:

Documents

5 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • This article was downloaded by: [Purdue University]On: 28 August 2014, At: 10:11Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

    Critical Reviews in Plant SciencesPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/bpts20

    Plant Pathogens in Irrigation Water: Challenges andOpportunitiesC. X. Hong a & G. W. Moorman ba Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia PolytechnicInstitute and State University, Hampton Roads Agricultural Research and Extension Center ,Virginia Beach, VA, 23455-3315b Department of Plant Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA,16802-4506Published online: 18 Jan 2007.

    To cite this article: C. X. Hong & G. W. Moorman (2005) Plant Pathogens in Irrigation Water: Challenges and Opportunities,Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24:3, 189-208, DOI: 10.1080/07352680591005838

    To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352680591005838

    PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

    Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the Content) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.

    This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

    http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/bpts20http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/07352680591005838http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352680591005838http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

  • Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24:189208, 2005Copyright c Taylor & Francis Inc.ISSN: 0735-2689 print / 1549-7836 onlineDOI: 10.1080/07352680591005838

    Plant Pathogens in Irrigation Water: Challengesand Opportunities

    C. X. HongDepartment of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and StateUniversity, Hampton Roads Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Beach, VA 23455-3315

    G. W. MoormanDepartment of Plant Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-4506

    Plant pathogens in irrigation water were recognized early inthe last century as a significant crop health issue. This issue has in-creased greatly in scope and degree of impact since that time and itwill continue to be a problem as agriculture increasingly dependson the use of recycled water. Plant pathogens detected from wa-ter resources include 17 species of Phytophthora, 26 of Pythium, 27genera of fungi, 8 species of bacteria, 10 viruses, and 13 species ofplant parasitic nematodes. There is substantial evidence demon-strating that contaminated irrigation water is a primary, if not thesole, source of inoculum for Phytophthora diseases of numerousnursery, fruit, and vegetable crops. These findings pose great chal-lenges and opportunities to the plant pathology community. A va-riety of water treatment methods are available but few have beenassessed for agricultural purposes under commercial conditions.Investigations into their technical feasibility and economics are ur-gently needed. Aquatic ecology of plant pathogens is an emergingfield of research that holds great promise for developing ecologi-cally based water decontamination and other strategies of pathogenmitigation. Pathogen detection and monitoring as well as biologicaland economic thresholds are much-needed IPM tools and shouldbe priorities of future research. Teaming with hydrologists, agri-cultural engineers, ecologists, geneticists, economists, statisticians,and farmers is essential to effectively attack such a complex issueof growing global importance. Research should proceed in con-junction with nutrient and pesticide management studies in a co-ordinated and comprehensive approach as they are interrelatedcomponents of water resource conservation and protection.

    Keywords aquatic ecology, biological threshold, pathogen detectionand monitoring, IPM, water resource conservation andprotection

    I. INTRODUCTIONOne factor common to all crop production is the need for

    water. As a common denominator in growing plants, water and

    Address correspondence to C. X. Hong, Department of Plant Pathol-ogy, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute andState University, Hampton Roads Agricultural Research and ExtensionCenter, Virginia Beach, VA 23455-3315. E-mail: chhong2@vt.edu

    all that it contains is a potential risk factor, particularly if it mustbe repeatedly applied to crops to compensate for limited rainfallor made available at a specific time in the crops development.If the water carries undesirable chemicals or microbes, an entirecrop can be lost. The subject of this review, the risk posed bythe plant pathogens in irrigation water, was recognized earlyin the last century as a significant crop health issue (Bewleyand Buddin, 1921; Oyler and Bewley, 1937). Whether the initialsource of water harbors pathogens or pathogens enter the wateralong the path of distribution, one consequence is the repeatedinoculation of plants with the pathogens.

    The problem of plant pathogens in irrigation water is aggra-vated by the increasing use of recycled water. Recycling irri-gation in some locales is crucial to comply with stringent wa-ter policies and regulations. As the concern over water scarcityspreads, agricultural use of water resources is being more closelymonitored and regulated by governments. In some localities, it ismandated or considered highly desirable that runoff and leachatefrom irrigated agricultural areas be captured to prevent nitro-gen, phosphorus, and pesticides from contaminating ground-water and surface supplies (Kabashima, 1993; von Broembsenet al., 2001; Norman et al., 2003). The trend in the United Statesis for farms to be viewed as point sources of pollution. If desig-nated as such by regulatory agencies, farmers will be requiredto comply with some of the same regulations as manufacturers.Although farmers are forced to look at production methods innew ways because of this possibility, it is important to note thatmost farm families live close to and utilize for personal purposesthe same water resources used as for growing crops or raisinglivestock (Scarpa, 2000). Farmers too are very interested in pre-venting the degradation of the water and conserving this vitalresource. In the course of devising and implementing best waterconservation management practices, the issue of plant pathogensin water has come to the forefront.

    There are reports of the presence of almost every majorpathogen group in water. In this review, we will discuss the possi-ble sources of plant pathogens in irrigation water, how irrigationmay distribute these pathogens, the methods used to detect and

    189

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    Purd

    ue U

    nive

    rsity

    ] at

    10:

    11 2

    8 A

    ugus

    t 201

    4

  • 190 C. X. HONG AND G. W. MOORMAN

    monitor the presence of plant pathogens, and the current tech-nology available for the mitigation of pathogens in water. Ourobjectives are to highlight selected papers that are the basis ofour current understanding of the problem of plant pathogens inwater and to point out what additional knowledge is needed toattack this issue of global importance.

    II. WATER SOURCES, IRRIGATION METHODS, ANDPLANT PATHOGENS

    Well water seldom contains plant pathogens (McCarter-Zorner et al., 1984; Pottorff and Panter, 1997; Themann et al.,2002; Yun, 2003). If, however, the well is not cased or if the headis not sealed near the surface, runoff carrying sediment can enterthe well and contaminate the water with plant pathogens. Whenwater is collected in cisterns recharged by rainfall from the roof,it may not necessarily be free of pathogens, but the number ofcontaminant species would be limited (Rattink, 1991). Runoff ofsurface water or wind-blown soil can contaminate water storagetanks, regardless of how the water is initially collected. Surfacewater supplies including ponds, lakes, rivers, and streams aswell as manmade reservoirs and canals are all possible sourcesof plant pathogens that originate from the underlying and sur-rounding soil or plant debris (Tables 16). Through these variousavenues, the initial water used for irrigation may be the sourceof plant pathogens.

    If the water source is free of pathogens, then pathogens mayenter the water at several points along the distribution path. Anyirrigation method in which the water comes in contact with soilor plant debris has an increased likelihood of acquiring plantpathogens. Furrow flooding and runoff from other methods ofirrigation can then carry soilborne pathogens throughout thewatered area. In outdoor production facilities where plants aregrown in containers and excess water and leachate are capturedand recycled, underlying soil may be a significant source ofpathogens if containers rest directly on the soil. Even if the areaunder and between containers is covered with impervious fabricfor capturing the excess water, most facilities do not have lined,soil-free channels directing water back to a holding pond, noris the pond itself lined. The water comes in direct contact withunderlying, possibly contaminated, soil. Pathogens in facilitiesgrowing containerized plant material can also originate from in-fected crop plants placed in the system. In greenhouses for exam-ple, pathogens may originate from infected plants started else-where and then placed in the system. Also potting soil that wasnot pasteurized may be the initial inoculum source. Pathogen-contaminated soil from immediately outside or on the floors ofthe greenhouse may fall into holding tanks, be brought in contactwith the plants or potting soil via contaminated tools, or be blownabout by strong ventilation systems. Shoreflies (Scatella stag-nalis) also can move pathogens within greenhouses (Goldbergand Stanghellini, 1990; Stanghellini et al., 1999), although theimportance of such vectoring has not been fully assessed. Mod-ern greenhouses have benches raised off the ground for holdingpotted plants away from untreated soil. Some operators employ

    impervious ebb and flow or flood and drain benches that aretemporarily flooded with water and then drained to tanks wherethe water is stored until pumped back onto the benches at the nextirrigation cycle. A variation of this technique, termed floodedfloor irrigation, positions containers of plants on an impervi-ous floor with a surrounding low curbing that allows the entireproduction floor to be flooded to the depth of a few centime-ters during irrigation and then drained away to a storage tank forreuse. Equipment driven across these floors and workers travers-ing the area can be the means of introducing contaminated soilto the water used to flood this area and ultimately to the holdingtank and all the connecting plumbing. In hydroponic, nutrientfilm, and other methods of producing plants with bare roots, themain sources of pathogens are the initial water source, plantsinfected as seedlings and then placed in the system, pathogen-contaminated soil allowed to get into the system, and the activityof insect vectors.

    To summarize, the initial contamination with plant pathogensof the water supply used for irrigation can originate from severalsources. The pathogen may be a natural inhabitant of the watersource or reside in the soil or in infected resident plants nearthe water and only be a transient inhabitant of the irrigationwater. Alternatively, a pathogen may not be endemic to an areabut may be brought to the production area from some distanceon infected plants transplanted into the watershed or placed inthe production area. Because the reduction or elimination ofwaterborne pathogens is time consuming, expensive, and nota simple task, it is important to determine the point source ofpathogens suspected of being carried in water so that those pointsof entry can be specifically targeted for treatment.

    III. PLANT PATHOGENS IN WATERThere are many examples in the literature associating crop

    losses with plant pathogens in water. Although almost everymajor pathogen group is represented among these cases, thereis limited field data directly demonstrating the epidemiologi-cal and economic significance of these waterborne pathogens(Hong et al., 2002a). When a particular species of pathogen isisolated from infected plants and also from the associated watersource, sediment, or particulates in the water source, a causallinkage is assumed. For example, there are reports from surveysof microbes in water noting the presence of species known to bepathogenic (Klotz et al., 1959; McIntosh, 1966; Taylor, 1977;Ali-Shtayeh and MacDonald, 1991; MacDonald et al., 1994;Oudemans, 1999; Bush, 2002; Yamak et al., 2002; Bush et al.,2003). The implication is that the isolates from the various posi-tions in the production area are one and the same. Until recently,techniques have not been available to prove that those differ-ent isolates of the same genus and species are actually identical.DNA analyses now can more clearly establish such relationships.Evidence that a particular isolate from an infected plant is thesame as one in water is more direct when experiments are per-formed. In some cases, an isolate known to have been responsiblefor an epidemic was put in the water used to irrigate test plants

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    by [

    Purd

    ue U

    nive

    rsity

    ] at

    10:

    11 2

    8 A

    ugus

    t 201

    4

  • PLANT PATHOGENS IN IRRIGATION WATER 191

    and re-isolated from newly infected plants. Also, plants havebeen inoculated, put into a production area, and the pathogenlater was detected in water that had been previously free of thatpathogen. The evidence, including circumstantial evidence, thatirrigation water can be a very significant avenue of introducingpathogens or moving pathogens within a crop is overwhelming.

    A. Phytophthora and Pythium Speciesin Irrigation Water

    Some of the earliest reports of plant pathogens in waterhave implicated the water molds, Phytophthora (Table 1)...

Recommended

View more >