phase ii environmental site assessment report … · environmental site assessment report water...

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT

WATER LINE REPLACEMENT IN BRIAR COURT AREA WBS NUMBER S-000035-0228-4

HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

PREPARED FOR: CHARLES D. GOODEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INCORPORATED

2320 HOLMES ROAD, SUITE A HOUSTON, TX 77051

PREPARED BY: HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC.

HOUSTON, TEXAS OCTOBER 11, 2016

REPORT NO. HG1313166.4-E KEY MAP NOS.: 489R&V AND 490J

October 11, 2016 Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated 2320 Holmes Road, Suite A Houston, TX 77051 Re: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area WBS Number S-000035-0228-4 Owner: City of Houston HVJ Project No.: HG1313166.4-E Dear Madam/Sir: Presented herein is our Phase II Environmental Site Assessment final report for the above referenced project. The assessment was performed in general accordance with our revised Proposal No. HG1313166.4-E dated July 14, 2016; current ASTM Standard Practice E-1903 - 97 (2002) “Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process” as modified by the City of Houston (COH) Department of Public Works and Engineering Infrastructure Design Manual “Geotechnical and Environmental Requirements.” This report presents HVJ Associates' understanding of the project's scope, the methodology we employed in executing the work, and the conclusions we reached subject to the limitations discussed in Section 5 of the report. It has been a pleasure to work with you on this project, and we appreciate the opportunity to be of service.

Sincerely,

HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. Texas Firm Registration No. F-000646

Edward Hawkinson, PG, MS, MBA Project Manager EH/NL Copies submitted: 4 final & 1 electronic (CD) The following lists the pages which complete this report:

● Main Text – 11 pages ● Appendix B – 7 pages ● Plates – 5 pages ● Appendix C – 24 pages ● Appendix A – 23 pages ● Appendix D – 4 pages

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... i

1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Objective and Rationale ......................................................................................1 1.2 Project Scope ..................................................................................................................2 1.3 Basis of Report ...............................................................................................................2 1.4 Qualifications of Personnel .............................................................................................2

2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................3 2.1 Results of Previous Environmental Studies .....................................................................3 2.2 Planned Construction Description ..................................................................................3 2.3 Boring Sampling Activities ..............................................................................................3 2.4 Laboratory Analysis Performed .......................................................................................4 2.5 Waste Management .........................................................................................................4

3. ASSESSMENT RESULTS ........................................................................................................4 3.1 Site Specific Soil Conditions ...........................................................................................4 3.2 Analytical Findings and PPCA ........................................................................................4

4. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................4 4.1 Summary and Conclusions ..............................................................................................4 4.2 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................5

5. LIMITATIONS .........................................................................................................................5

6. REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................6

PLATES

SITE VICINITY MAP ..................................................................................................................................... 1

BORING LOCATION MAPS ......................................................................................................... 2A & 2B

PPCA LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................................ 3

APPENDICES

CITY OF HOUSTON FACILITY PERMITS ........................................................................................... A

BORING LOGS .............................................................................................................................................. B

ANALYTICAL LAB REPORT/CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION ............................ C

WASTE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION .............................................................................................. D

i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

HVJ Associates, Inc. was contracted by Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated to perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA). The work will involve water line replacement in the Briar Court Area in west Houston, Texas. A site vicinity map is provided as Plate 1.

The objective of this assessment is to determine the nature of possible environmental contamination associated with five sites with recognized environmental conditions (RECs) that occupied the Subject Project Alignments and to determine if soil and/or groundwater contamination from these locations might impact the design and construction of the proposed project. Based on information contained in the Phase I ESA report for this project, it was determined that impacts (if any) to the Subject Project Alignments could be assessed with six borings. This assessment was performed in general accordance with our revised Proposal No. HG1313166.4-E dated July 14, 2016 and current ASTM Standard Practice E-1903 - 97 (2002) “Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process” as modified by the City of Houston (COH) Department of Public Works and Engineering Infrastructure Design Manual “Geotechnical and Environmental Requirements.”

The available information for this Subject Project Alignments and subsurface assessment, conducted during September 2016 are summarized below:

• Six borings were drilled or attempted using GeoProbe soil boring equipment at locations near the REC sites on or very near the Subject Project Alignments.

• One soil sample from each boring was obtained for laboratory analysis of chemicals of concern (COCs). Groundwater was not found in sufficient quantities for sampling at any of the boring locations.

• The subsurface soils consist of (in general) brown to gray sandy clay and brown fine sand.

• No total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were found above the reporting limit in any soil sample collected along the Subject Project Alignments.

• The volatile organic compound MEK was found above the reporting limit in the boring EB2 soil sample collected along the Subject Project Alignments. No VOC compounds were detected in any other soil samples collected along the Subject Project Alignments.

• One Potentially Petroleum Contaminated Area (PPCA) was identified along the Subject Project Alignments from the location of boring EB1 at approximate Station 0+50 to boring EB3 at approximate Station 3+75 along Longworth Lane (see Plate 3).

It is likely that the majority of the soils will be non-hazardous and possible that no soil excavated during construction along the Subject Project Alignments will require special handling. Using the City of Houston criteria, one potentially petroleum contaminated area (PPCA) was identified along the Subject Project Alignments.

Based on the results of this assessment, we recommend no further soil testing of the REC areas along the Subject Project Alignments. This executive summary does not fully summarize our findings and opinions. Those findings and opinions are related through the full report only.

1

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Objective and Rationale HVJ Associates, Inc. (HVJ Associates) was contracted by Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated to perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) project involving water line replacement in the Briar Court area in west Houston, Texas. A site vicinity map is provided as Plate 1. The assessment was done in accordance with City of Houston, Department of Public Works and Engineering Infrastructure Design Manual Chapter 11 “Geotechnical and Environmental Requirements” and the current ASTM Standard Practice E-1903 - 97 (2002) “Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process.” The sites to be assessed, sample analysis, approximate depth of construction, boring depth, concern documentation and comments are listed in Table 1 below.

Table 1 Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area Project

Name and Location of Concern/Boring No.

Sample Analysis

Approx. Depth of Construction (ft.)

Concern Documentation/Comment

Westheimer Mobil 10146 Westheimer Road EB1, EB2, EB3

VOCs, TPH 8

This site is listed as priority code “groundwater impacted, no apparent threats or impacts to receptors” and status code “final concurrence issued case closed.” Tanks installed during 1978 were removed at this facility during 2000. This site is also listed for failure to maintain the site vapor recovery system in proper operating condition. There was no reported resolution of this violation. This facility is a recognized condition due to the proximity of this LPST facility to the Subject Project Area and the possibility that remnant petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in site area soil and/or groundwater could impact the Subject Project Area.

Texaco Service Station 10202 Westheimer Road EB1, EB2, EB3

VOC, TPH 8

This site is listed with priority code “groundwater impacted, no apparent threats or impacts to receptors” and status code “final concurrence issued, case closed.” This facility is a recognized condition due to the proximity of this LPST facility to the Subject Project Area and the possibility that remnant petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in site area soil and/or groundwater could impact the Subject Project Area.

Esquire Fine Cleaners 10230 Westheimer Road EB1, EB2, EB3

VOC, TPH 8

This facility is listed in the city directories from 1981 to 2008 as a dry cleaners location and workers at this may have handled (or disposed) dry cleaning related solvents at this facility. This facility is a recognized condition and possible concern to project construction due to its proximity to the Subject Project Area and possible subsurface contamination from dry cleaning chemicals.

Shell 12490 Memorial Drive EB4, EB5, EB6

VOCs, TPH 8

This site is listed with priority code “groundwater impacted, public/domestic water supply well within 0.25 -0.5 miles” and status code “final concurrence issued, case closed.” This facility is a recognized condition and possible concern to project construction due to its proximity to the Subject Project Area and the possibility that remnant petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in site area soil and/or groundwater could impact the Subject Project Area.

Pilgrim Cleaners 12442 Memorial Drive EB4, EB5, EB6

VOCs, TPH 8

This facility is listed as a drop station in the DCR database with no evaluations, violations and/or enforcement action but may have (or have handled) dry cleaning related solvents since it is in a remediation program. This facility is a recognized condition and possible concern to project construction due to its proximity to the Subject Project Area and possible subsurface contamination from dry cleaning chemicals.

2

The objective of the assessment was to determine the nature of possible environmental contamination associated with the various REC sites on the Subject Project Alignments. Groundwater was not encountered in sufficient quantity for sampling at any of the boring locations. 1.2 Project Scope The following tasks were performed:

1. Prepared a site-specific health and safety plan per 29 CFR 1910.120 (a copy of this document is not attached but is available upon request).

2. Obtained City of Houston facility permits for all boring locations. Copies of these permits and related documents are provided in Appendix A.

3. Installed six borings to approximately five feet below the proposed depth of construction, to the top of the water table or to auger refusal. All borings were installed using GeoProbe equipment.

4. Performed soil sample field screening with an organic vapor meter (OVM) and obtained selected samples for subsequent laboratory analyses.

5. Prepared boring logs (copies of these logs are provided in Appendix B).

6. Submitted selected samples to A&B Laboratory for TPH and VOC analysis depending. Laboratory results, QA/QC documentation and chain-of-custody forms are provided in Appendix C.

7. Coordinated drilled cuttings and related drummed non-hazardous waste disposal. Project derived soil waste was transported to a state approved landfill for disposal by an agent of USA Environment. Waste disposal documentation is provided in Appendix D.

8. Prepared this report summarizing our findings with conclusions and recommendations.

1.3 Basis of Report Although this assessment has been a reasonably thorough attempt to identify soil and groundwater contamination at the REC locations, there is a possibility that contamination may have escaped detection due to the limitations of this assessment, or the presence of undetected and unreported environmental releases. HVJ Associates reserves the right to alter our conclusions and recommendations based on our review of any information obtained after the date of this report.

Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar conditions, by environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional information included in this report.

1.4 Qualifications of Personnel The primary assessor for this Phase II ESA is Mr. Edward Hawkinson, PG. Mr. Hawkinson holds BS and MS degrees in geology from The Ohio State University and the University of Cincinnati, respectively. Mr. Hawkinson is a registered Professional Geologist in Texas (license #45). His career encompasses a period exceeding 30 years involving environmental assessments, hydrogeology, water resource evaluations and energy exploration.

3

2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

2.1 Results of Previous Environmental Studies HVJ Associates September 29, 2014 Phase I ESA report “Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area” listed five locations with recognized environmental conditions (RECs) based on a Subject Project Alignments reconnaissance, aerial photos interpretation and regulatory data search. These REC locations along with concern documentation and other information are listed in Table 1. Based on our ESA report findings, HVJ Associates concluded that there is a potential for environmental contamination to affect the Subject Project Alignments at these REC locations and recommended further environmental assessment since the proposed project construction activity involves excavation deeper than five feet below the existing grade. 2.2 Planned Construction Description The project involves water line replacement in the Briar Court area. The invert depth for the open-cut sections will be about eight feet below the existing grade.

2.3 Boring Sampling Activities HVJ Associates performed this Phase II ESA in general accordance with the guidance contained in the American Society for Testing and Materials Designation E 1903-97 (2002), Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ASTM E 1903) as modified by the City of Houston Public Works and Engineering Infrastructure Design Manual “Geotechnical and Environmental Requirements”. Prior to conducting our on-site assessment, City of Houston maps were reviewed to determine the location of water and sewer utilities along the Subject Project Alignments. Texas One-Call was contacted to mark other near surface utilities in the Subject Project Alignments. Prior to mobilization, a site-specific health and safety plan was prepared in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120. Prior to drilling and sample screening, all sampling equipment was thoroughly cleaned to prevent cross contamination. All environmental soil borings were installed by driller Alpine Field Services using GeoProbe sampling equipment.

Based on HVJ Associates’ understanding of the proposed construction plans, borings were installed to a total depth of 12 feet below ground surface (bgs). At each location, four-foot long soil cores were collected from the ground surface to the top of the water bearing zone or to the approximate depth of construction provided by Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated. Borings were spaced at regular intervals on or very near the locations of the proposed construction activity (see plan of borings on Plates 2A and 2B). The soil borings were placed in the best practicable locations, considering the location of utilities and other site-specific conditions. Soil samples obtained were continuously examined for impact using visual and olfactory methods. Samples were also screened for organic vapors with a properly calibrated Organic Vapor Meter (OVM). Descriptions of the materials encountered are presented on the boring logs (see Appendix B).

One soil sample was collected from each boring and submitted for laboratory analysis. OVM readings, along with visual evidence of impact and a physical description of the soils, were recorded on a boring log. The soil samples were obtained for laboratory analysis from the zone of the highest OVM readings. If there were no OVM readings (above background), a soil sample was obtained from the top of the water table. If no groundwater was encountered, the soil samples were obtained from the approximate depth of construction listed in Table 1, Section 1.1. Groundwater was not encountered in sufficient quantity for sampling at any of the boring locations. The on-site screening was conducted by cutting a sub-sample from each one-foot interval of core with a decontaminated knife. The soil samples were placed in airtight containers (sealable plastic bags) and held for approximately twenty minutes to allow the volatilization of organic vapors. At the end of this period, the headspace air inside the container was screened with the OVM. This was accomplished by inserting the OVM probe tip into a narrow opening in the plastic bag seal. The headspace reading and corresponding depth was recorded on the boring log. Following OVM

4

screening, one soil sample from each borehole was selected for laboratory analyses (OVM readings are presented on the boring logs). Samples were selected for analysis based on criteria described above. The samples selected were placed into pre-labeled laboratory-supplied glass jars, placed on water ice in an insulated cooler and shipped under chain-of-custody to A&B Laboratory in Houston, Texas for analysis. Subsequent to the drilling and sampling activities, each borehole was plugged from total depth to the surface using bentonite plugging material in accordance with standard drilling practice. 2.4 Laboratory Analysis Performed A&B Laboratory performed the following analyses on selected soil samples from the environmental borings installed along the Subject Project Alignments as follows: • TPH using TCEQ TX Method 1005; and • Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method SW-846 8260C.

Copies of laboratory reports by A&B Laboratory as well as the standard chain-of-custody documentation are included in Appendix C.

2.5 Waste Management Assessment derived wastes (primarily soil cuttings) were generated in a small amounts during this assessment. Approximately five kilograms of soil cuttings were generated per boring. These materials were containerized and transported to HVJ Associates property for temporary storage until the results of the laboratory analyses were received in order to determine disposal requirements. Landfill disposal of these materials took place under Republic Services Non-Hazardous Waste Manifest by an agent of USA Environment. Copies of the Republic Services Special Waste Profile and manifest documents are provided in Appendix D.

3. ASSESSMENT RESULTS

3.1 Site Specific Soil Conditions The subsurface soils consist of (in general) brown to gray sandy clay and brown fine sand. Specific soil descriptions and field observations for the soil borings are included on the boring logs contained in Appendix B. Soil classifications presented on the boring logs are based on visual field classification and have not been verified by geotechnical laboratory tests. Actual soil conditions may differ from those presented on the boring logs.

3.2 Analytical Findings and PPCA Soil analytical results show that for all borings levels of TPH are below the reporting limit. The VOC MEK was found above the reporting limit in boring EB2 soil sample. No VOC compounds were detected in any other soil samples collected along the Subject Project Alignments.

Using the City of Houston criteria, one PPCA was identified along the Subject Project Alignments. This PPCA extends from the location of boring EB1 at approximate Station 0+50 to the location of boring EB3 at approximate Station 3+75 (see Plate 3). The City of Houston Guide Specifications 02105 (03-18-2005) Chemical Sampling and Analysis and 02120 (03-18-2005) Transportation and Disposal for construction defines a PPCA as “an area within station-to-station locations identified on drawings where petroleum contamination has been detected in soil or groundwater.”

4. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Summary and Conclusions The subsurface soils consist of (in general) brown to gray sandy clay and brown fine sand. We conclude that all soil samples collected were not found to contain TPH at or above the reporting limit and at or below the TCEQ Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Rule for TotSoilComb and GWSoilIng

5

exposure pathway for surface soil listed in TCEQ Table 1 – Tier 1 Residential Soil PCLs for a 0.5-acre source area. We conclude that the soil sample collected from boring EB2 was found to contain MEK above the reporting limit and below the TCEQ Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Rule for TotSoilComb and GWSoilIng exposure pathway for surface soil listed in TCEQ Table 1 – Tier 1 Residential Soil PCLs for a 0.5-acre source area which are 40,000 and 29 mg/kg respectively. We conclude that all other soil samples collected were not found to contain VOCs at or above the reporting limit.

Based on the information contained in this report and using the City of Houston Potential Petroleum Contaminated Areas (PPCA) criteria, we conclude that one PPCA is present along the Subject Project Alignments. This PPCA extends from the location of boring EB1 at approximate Station 0+50 to the location of boring EB3 at approximate Station 3+75. During construction, a decision regarding PPCA soil classification will be made after the analysis of stockpiled soil.

The City of Houston Guide Specifications 02105 (03-18-2005) Chemical Sampling and Analysis and 02120 (03-18-2005) Transportation and Disposal for construction defines a PPCA as “an area within station-to-station locations identified on drawings where petroleum contamination has been detected in soil or groundwater.” 4.2 Recommendations Based on a comparison of analytical results detailed in this report with TCEQ Protective Concentration Levels and other information, we recommend no further environmental assessment along the Subject Project Alignments. We recommend no additional worker protection since contaminant levels are relatively low. We recommend no petroleum resistant piping/gaskets and other petroleum contaminated design considerations for this project. In the event that environmental contamination is found during construction, we recommend health, safety and other procedures as outlined in the current COH Guide Specifications 02105 and 02120.

5. LIMITATIONS

This report is an instrument of service of HVJ Associates, Inc. The report was prepared for and is intended for the exclusive use of Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated and the COH. The report’s contents may not be relied upon by any other party without the express written permission of HVJ Associates. With the written permission of Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated and/or the COH, HVJ Associates will meet with a third party to help identify the additional services required, if any, to permit such third party to rely on the information contained in this report, but only to the same extent of Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated and/or the COH reliance, and subject to the same contractual, technological, and other limitations to which Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Incorporated and the COH has agreed. The report’s findings are based on conditions that existed on the date of HVJ Associates site visit and field assessment and should not be relied upon to precisely represent conditions at any other time. The scope of service executed for this project is not equivalent to the scope of service needed to provide the information to completely establish the quantities and distribution of the petroleum hydrocarbon and/or other compounds affected soils present at the Subject Project Alignments. HVJ Associates has based the conclusions included in this report on its observation of existing Subject Project Alignments conditions, its interpretation of Subject Project Alignments history, its interpretation of the Subject Project Alignments usage information it was able to access, and the results of a limited program of subsurface exploration, sample screening and chemical analysis. The concentration of contaminants HVJ Associates measured may not be representative of conditions between locations sampled. Be aware that conditions may change at any sampled or unsampled location as a function of time, in response to natural conditions, chemical reactions, and/or other events.

6

Conclusions about Subject Project Alignments conditions under no circumstances comprise a warranty that conditions in all areas within the Subject Project Alignments (and below existing grade) are of the same quality as the Subject Project Alignments sampled.

The scope of service HVJ Associates implemented was based, in part, on the rules and regulations for contaminated sites as promulgated by the TCEQ and the COH. The rules, regulations and guidelines by which this assessment was conducted were understood to be current or expected at the time HVJ Associates developed its proposal. Any additional information about this Subject Project Alignments that becomes available should be provided to HVJ Associates for its review, so HVJ Associates can modify its recommendations as necessary.

6. REFERENCES

The following references were used to compile this report:

• Bureau of Economic Geology, 1982. Geologic Atlas of Texas, Houston Sheet, University of Texas at Austin.

• USDA Soil Conservation Service (Natural Resources Conservation Service), 1976. Soil Survey of Harris County, Texas.

• ASTM Standard Practice E-1903 – 97 (2002) “Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process.”

• City of Houston, Department of Public Works and Engineering Infrastructure Design Manual Chapter 11 “Geotechnical and Environmental Requirements.”

• ASTM Standard Practice E-1903 – 97 (2002) “Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Process.” ”

• City of Houston Guide Specifications 02105 and 02120.

• TCEQ TRRP Residential Soil and Groundwater Protective Concentration Limits (PCLs) Tables (November 12, 2014).

• HVJ Associates Phase I Environmental Site Assessment – “Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area” (September 29, 2014).

PLATES

APPROVED BY:

6120 S. Dairy Ashford RoadHouston, Texas 77072-1010281.933.7388 Ph281.933.7293 Fax

PROJECT NO.:

PREPARED BY:

DRAWING NO.:

DATE: 9/14/2016 EH NL

HG1313166.4-E PLATE 1

SITE VICINITY MAP Phase II ESA - Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area

WBS No. S-000035-0228-4

SUBJECT PROJECT AREA

APPROVED BY:


PROJECT NO.:

PREPARED BY:

DRAWING NO.:

DATE: 9/9/2016 EH NL

HG1313166.4-E PLATE 2A

LEGEND:

APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS

BORING LOCATIONS MAP Phase II ESA – Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area

WBS No.: S-000035-0228-4

EB1 EB2 EB3

APPROVED BY:


PROJECT NO.:

PREPARED BY:

DRAWING NO.:


HG1313166.4-E PLATE 2B

LEGEND:



WBS No.: S-000035-0228-4

EB4

EB5

EB6

APPROVED BY:


PROJECT NO.:

PREPARED BY:

DRAWING NO.:

DATE: 9/26/2016 EH NL

BORINGS AND PPCA LOCATION MAP WATER LINE REPLACEMENT IN BRIAR COURT AREA

WBS NO.: S-000035-0228-4

HG1313166.4-E PLATE 3

LEGEND:


EB1

SCALE: NTS

APPENDIX A

CITY OF HOUSTON FACILITY PERMITS

FACILITY PERMIT

ARTICLE XII, CHAPTER 40,

CITY OF HOUSTON CODE OF ORDINANCE

PERMIT NO: CIP-16-08-01

Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Article XII, Chapter 40, City of Houston Code

of Ordinances, having been approved and adopted by the City of Houston, Texas; the

application made for this permit having been approved; said Facility Permit is hereby

issued to:

HVJ, Permittee,

For the placement or maintenance of:

X Environmental test bore

At the following location:

Near Tealwood Dr & Longworth Ln Intersection (EB-1) (A Minimum of 10 feet between the

facility and any existing sanitary sewer lines and a minimum of 5 feet between the facility and

any existing water and storm lines and traffic signal conduits shall be maintained) on the

condition that, by acceptance of this permit, Permittee expressly covenants and agrees to

comply with each and every term, provision and condition contained in Article XII, Chapter

40, City of Houston Code of Ordinances.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Maher Tanbouz, P.E., Supervising Engineer

Department of Public Works and Engineering

1. The Permittee shall contact a Utility Coordinating Committee at (713) 223-4567 or

(800) 245-4545 minimum of (48) hours prior to construction to have utilities field

located.

2. The Permittee shall contact the Traffic Management Branch at (832) 395-3020 for lane

closure permits.

3. The Permittee shall be fully responsible for any damages to existing water, wastewater,

storm sewer lines and traffic signal conduits. All damages shall be repaired in

accordance with City of Houston, Dept. of Public Works and Engineering “Standard

Construction Specifications” with latest addenda and amendments thereto, at no cost to

the City of Houston.

4. The Permittee shall notify the Supervising Engineer at [email protected] a

minimum of (48) hour prior to drilling or plugging to arrange for an inspection.

Maher Tanbouz

FACILITY PERMIT







issued to:

HVJ, Permittee,










-----------------------------------------------------------------





located.


closure permits.








Maher Tanbouz

FACILITY PERMIT







issued to:

HVJ, Permittee,




Near Seagler Rd & Westheimer Rd Intersection (EB-4) (A Minimum of 10 feet between the






-----------------------------------------------------------------





located.


closure permits.








Maher Tanbouz

FACILITY PERMIT







issued to:

HVJ, Permittee,










-----------------------------------------------------------------





located.


closure permits.








Maher Tanbouz

APPROVED BY:


PROJECT NO.:

PREPARED BY:

DRAWING NO.:


HG1313166.4-E PLATE 1A

LEGEND:



WBS No.: S-000035-0228-4

EB1 EB2 EB3

APPROVED BY:


PROJECT NO.:

PREPARED BY:

DRAWING NO.:


HG1313166.4-E PLATE 1B

LEGEND:



WBS No.: S-000035-0228-4

EB4

EB5

EB6

August 31, 2016 Mr. Tuan Nguyen City of Houston Department of Public Works & Engineering 611 Walker, 14th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Re: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)

Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area WBS No. S-000035-0228-3 Owner: City of Houston HVJ Proposal No.: HG1313166.4-E Dear Mr. Nguyen: Please find attached an “Application for Monitoring Well/Boring Permit” for environmental borings we propose to install within the City of Houston (COH) right of way in 6 various locations in Houston area. The proposed boring locations are annotated on the attached GIMS maps. We understand that because this is a COH project there will be no permit costs for the permit we are requesting. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Edward Hawkinson at 281.804.5766 or Niem Ly at 281.983.8825. Sincerely, HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. Texas Firm Registration No. F-000646

Edward Hawkinson, PG Project Manager Attachments NL:eh

Approved Legal 03/05 CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS

Public Works & Engineering Department

Application for Monitoring Well/Boring Permit

ARTICLE XII, CHAPTER 40, CITY OF HOUSTON CODE OF ORDINANCES ALL PERMITS SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ONE (1) YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE

I: APPLICANT INFORMATION

Today’s Date : August 31, 2016

Permit Status: Are you obtaining this permit for a City project? Yes No

If yes, what is the CIP/GFS number of this project? WBS No.: S-000035-0228-4

Who is the City’s Project Manager for this project? Maher Tanbouz at 832-395-2260

Is this a renewal application? Yes No

Applicant: Name of Owner/Operator: HVJ Associates, Inc.

Telephone Number: 281.983.8825 Fax: 281.933.7293

Street Address: 6120 S. Dairy Ashford Road

Houston, Texas 77072-1010 E-mail Address (If applicable): [email protected]

If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, or association, then the applicant shall provide evidence of its existence, of its authority to maintain the facility, and of the authority of the person signing the application to act on behalf of the entity.

Person authorized to file application: Name: Edward F. Hawkinson Title: Project Manager

Phone Number: 281.804.5766

E-mail Address (If applicable): [email protected]

Type of Business Entity: Corporation

(i.e. corporation, partnership, association, sole proprietorship). Organization documents of business entity should be attached. (certificate of incorporation, assumed name certificate, etc.)

Corporate Registered Agent (If applicable): Name: Herbert V. Johnson Title: President

Address: 6120 S. Dairy Ashford Rd., Houston, TX 77072

Phone Number: 281.933.7388 E-mail Address (If applicable): [email protected]




Emergency Contact Information: List two(2) persons

Name: Edward F. Hawkinson Mobile Telephone: 281.804.5766

Business Address: 6120 S. Dairy Ashford Rd., Houston, TX 77072-1010

Business Telephone: 281.983.8829

Home Address: 1415 Welch Street, Houston, TX 77006 Home Telephone: 713.520.1116

Name: Hossam Esmail Mobile Telephone: 281.415.7723

Business Address: 6120 S. Dairy Ashford Rd., Houston, TX 77072-1010

Business Telephone: 281.933.7388

Home Address: 22535 Holly Lake Drive, Katy, TX 77450 Home Telephone: 281.395.9762

Agents, Contractors, Engineers: List every agent, contractor, or engineer that will perform work in the installation, monitoring and removal of the facility. (Additional information may be attached). A copy of the Driller’s State license for drilling monitoring well facilities must also be attached.

Name: MEDI, Inc. (tentative - reserve the right to employ an alternate driller) Telephone: 713.896.6260

Address: 12243B FM 529 Houston, TX 77041

Work Performed: Boring installation using Geoprobe

Name: Telephone:

Address:

Work Performed:

II: MONITORING WELL / BORING INFORMATION

Applying for multiple facilities? Yes No

(Identify the type of each facility.)

Number of Facilities: 2 (estimate) Monitoring Well or other Device(s)

6 Environmental Test Boring(s)

8 TOTAL




Detailed Facility Location Description: SEE ATTACHED LIST AND MAPS

Attach additional descriptions for multiple locations if necessary.

Key Map:

489V & 490J

Location on GIMS map must be attached

There must be minimum of 10 feet between the facility and any existing sanitary sewer lines and a minimum of 5 feet between the facility and any existing water and storm lines and traffic signal conduits shall be maintained

Attach plan(s,) showing design, dimension and depth of the facility, the manner in which it will be placed, and the process that will be used for its removal and closure.(Information is required for both monitoring wells and borings)

Registered Engineer/Surveyor: City of Houston

Address: 611 Walker St, Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: 832-395-2260

Plan Number:

III. PERMIT INFORMATION

NOTE: ALL PERMIT FEES ARE WAIVED FOR THOSE APPLICANTS APPLYING FOR A PERMIT FOR A CITY PROJECT.

PERMIT TYPE APPLICATION FEES CALCULATIONS

ORIGINAL $ 200* (1st facility) + $25* (each additional facility if applicable) → $

RENEWAL $25* for each facility → $ $5* Administrative fee to process all applications → $ 5.00

TOTAL FEE: $ 0 (City Project) Make a Certified or Cashier’s Check payable to “City of Houston.”

* ALL FEES ARE NON-REFUNDABLE

IV. INSURANCE AND BOND INFORMATION

NO PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT AN INSURANCE AND BOND CERTIFICATE

Restoration Bond No. (Original Bond Attached): N/A Restoration Bond Sum: N/A

Bond Surety Name: Telephone:

Address:

Contact Person:

E-mail Address(If applicable):

STATEMENT REGARDING THE REQUIREMENT TO “Attach plan(s) showing design, dimension and depth of the facility, the manner in which it will be placed, and the process that will be used for its removal and closure.” Six borings will be installed to access five locations with recognized environmental concerns. These locations of concern, type of concern and other information is shown in the following table:

Location of Concern Type of Concern Max. Depth of

Construction (ft.)Recommended

AnalysisWestheimer Mobil 10146 Westheimer Road Texaco Service Station 10202 Westheimer Road Esquire Fine Cleaners 10230 Westheimer Road EB1 – EB3

Dry Cleaners & PST/LPST

8 VOC, TPH

Shell 12490 Memorial Drive Pilgrim Cleaners 12442 Memorial Drive EB4 – EB6

Dry Cleaners & PST/LPST 8 VOC, TPH

The objective of the investigation is to determine the nature of possible environmental contamination associated with the industrial sites and their impact to the design, construction and operation of the proposed facilities. It has been determined that none of the proposed location may require pavement cores. The borings will be advanced using direct push (Geoprobe) techniques and will be continuously sampled from the surface to the boring total depth below ground surface (bgs). Soil samples will be screened for evidence of impacts in the field using an organic vapor meter (OVM). In accordance with City of Houston guidelines, one soil sample will be collected from each boring and submitted for laboratory analysis. Should groundwater be encountered, two temporary monitoring wells will be installed and water sampled for laboratory analysis. No more than one monitoring well will be installed at each location. Subsequent to the drilling and sampling activities (the same day or the next day), the temporary monitoring well screen and riser pipe will be removed and each borehole will be plugged from boring total depth to the surface using excess soil cuttings/bentonite slurry and the surface repaired with either topsoil, asphalt patch or concrete as appropriate.

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD

CERTIFICATE HOLDER

© 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2014/01)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

CANCELLATION

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

LOCJECTPRO-POLICY

GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

OCCURCLAIMS-MADE

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $DAMAGE TO RENTEDEACH OCCURRENCE $

MED EXP (Any one person) $

PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $

GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $

$RETENTIONDED

CLAIMS-MADE

OCCUR

$

AGGREGATE $

EACH OCCURRENCE $UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

INSRLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER

POLICY EFF(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS

PERSTATUTE

OTH-ER

E.L. EACH ACCIDENT

E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE

E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT

$

$

$

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE

If yes, describe underDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below

(Mandatory in NH)OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

WORKERS COMPENSATIONAND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

ANY AUTOALL OWNED SCHEDULED

HIRED AUTOSNON-OWNED

AUTOS AUTOS

AUTOS

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

BODILY INJURY (Per person)

BODILY INJURY (Per accident)PROPERTY DAMAGE $

$

$

$

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIODINDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THISCERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

INSDADDL

WVDSUBR

N / A

$

$

(Ea accident)

(Per accident)

OTHER:

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THISCERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIESBELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject tothe terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to thecertificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

INSURED

PHONE(A/C, No, Ext):

PRODUCER

ADDRESS:E-MAIL

FAX(A/C, No):

CONTACTNAME:

NAIC #

INSURER A :

INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORETHE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED INACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INS025 (201401)

12/2/2015

Weiser Insurance Agency8303 Southwest FreewaySuite 510Houston TX 77074

Tammy Wilson(713)777-8100 (713)777-8101

[email protected]

HVJ Associates, Inc6120 S. Dairy Ashford Rd.

Houston TX 77072

The HartfordUtica National Insurance Co. 13998Commerce and Industry InsuranceTexas Mutual Insurance Company 22945

15-16

AX

X

X

61 UUNZP0869 12/31/2015 12/31/2016

1,000,000300,00010,000

1,000,0002,000,0002,000,000

Employee Benefits 1,000,000

B X4889657 9/15/2015 9/15/2016

1,000,000

PIP-Basic 2,500

CX

EBU011414922 9/15/2015 9/15/2016

10,000,000

D TSF0001230889 12/1/2015 12/1/20161,000,0001,000,0001,000,000

Larry Weiser/ASW

City of Houston Geo-Environmental Services Public Works/Engineering Dept 611 Walker Houstn, TX 77002

ADDITIONAL COVERAGESRef # Description Edition DateForm No.Coverage Code

Limit 1 Limit 2 Limit 3 Deductible Amount Deductible Type Premium

Ref # Description Coverage Code Form No. Edition Date




















Copyright 2001, AMS Services, Inc.OFADTLCV

UM/UIM CSL BI UUBI

1,000,000 1,000,000

Increased employer's liability INEL

COMMENTS/REMARKS

COPYRIGHT 2000, AMS SERVICES INC.OFREMARK

The General Liability Policy includes a blanket automatic additional insured endorsement that provides additional insured status to the certificate holder only when there is a written insured contract between the insured and certificate holder that requires such status. Commercial General Liability Form # HG00 01 06 05 The General Liability policy includes a blanket automatic Primary & Non-Contributory endorsement that provides Primary & Non-Contributory status to the certificate holder only when there is a written insured contract between the insured and certificate holder that requires such status. Commercial General Liability Coverage Form HG00 01 06 05 The General Liability Policy includes a blanket automatic waiver of subrogation endorsement that provides this feature only when there is a written contract between the insured and certificate holder that requires it. Commercial General Liability Coverage form # HG00 01 06 05 The General Liability Policy includes an endorsement providing that 30 days' notice of cancellation will be furnished to the certificate holder except 10 days notice of nonpayment of premium. Common Policy Conditions form # IL 001711 98 The Commercial Auto Policy includes a blanket automatic additional insured endorsement that provides additional insured status to the certificate holder only when there is a written insured contract between the insured and certificate holder that requires such status. Commercial Automobile Extension Form # 8-E-2419 The Commercial Auto Policy includes a blanket automatic waiver of subrogation endorsement that provides this feature only when there is a written contract between the insured and certificate holder that requires it. Commercial Automobile Extension Endorement Form # 8-E-2419 The Work Comp Policy includes a blanket automatic waiver of subrogation endorsement that provides this feature only when there is a written contract between the insured and certificate holder that requires it. Form # WC42 03 04B The Umbrella is Follow Form

APPENDIX B

BORING LOGS

NOHYDROCARBONODOR

NOHYDROCARBONODOR

NOHYDROCARBONODOR(SAMPLE TOLAB 8-12 FT.)

Brown and gray Sandy Clay

***BORING TERMINATED AT 12 FEET BELOWGROUND SURFACE (BGS)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.6

10.6

10.6

10.6

PID

(ppm

)

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Blow CountRec./RQD

RemarksWell

ConstructionDep

th

Sam

ple

Lith

olo

gy

Description

Date Completed:

Checked By:

Driller:

Equipment:

GW Level: Time/Date:

Ground Surface Elevation:

Well Construction Data

9/8/16

NL

ALPINE

GEOPROBE

12.0Outer Casing/Stick Up:

9/8/16

EH

0 0

- To:

- To:

- To:

- To:

From:

From:

From:

From:

Screen:

Pack:

Seal:

Grout:

Inner Casing:

Date Started:

Logged By:

Drilling Co.:

Method:

Boring Depth:

Initial GW Level:

Client:

Project:

Page 1 of 1

EB1Charles D. Gooden Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area

Job No.:HG1313166.4-E (WBS No. S-000035-0228-4)

Boring/Well:

5

10

5

10

HVJ Associates, Inc.

Telephone:Fax:

LAE

WN

L03

HG

131

3166

.4-E

WL

RE

PLA

CE

ME

NT

IN B

RIA

R C

OU

RT

AR

EA

.GP

J L

AE

WN

L03.

GD

T 9

/9/1

6

NOHYDROCARBONODOR

NOHYDROCARBONODOR



Light gray Sandy Clay


0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PID

(ppm

)

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Blow CountRec./RQD

RemarksWell

ConstructionDep

th

Sam

ple

Lith

olo

gy

Description

Date Completed:

Checked By:

Driller:

Equipment:




9/8/16

NL

ALPINE

GEOPROBE


9/8/16

EH

0 0

- To:

- To:

- To:

- To:

From:

From:

From:

From:

Screen:

Pack:

Seal:

Grout:

Inner Casing:

Date Started:

Logged By:

Drilling Co.:

Method:

Boring Depth:

Initial GW Level:

Client:

Project:

Page 1 of 1



Job No.:HG1313166.4-E (WBS No. S-000035-0228-4)

Boring/Well:

5

10

5

10


Telephone:Fax:

LAE

WN

L03

HG

131

3166

.4-E

WL

RE

PLA

CE

ME

NT

IN B

RIA

R C

OU

RT

AR

EA

.GP

J L

AE

WN

L03.

GD

T 9

/9/1

6

NOHYDROCARBONODOR

NOHYDROCARBONODOR


Brown Sandy Clay


Reddish brown Sandy Clay


0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PID

(ppm

)

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Blow CountRec./RQD

RemarksWell

ConstructionDep

th

Sam

ple

Lith

olo

gy

Description

Date Completed:

Checked By:

Driller:

Equipment:




9/8/16

NL

ALPINE

GEOPROBE


9/8/16

EH

0 0

- To:

- To:

- To:

- To:

From:

From:

From:

From:

Screen:

Pack:

Seal:

Grout:

Inner Casing:

Date Started:

Logged By:

Drilling Co.:

Method:

Boring Depth:

Initial GW Level:

Client:

Project:

Page 1 of 1



Job No.:HG1313166.4-E (WBS No. S-000035-0228-4)

Boring/Well:

5

10

5

10


Telephone:Fax:

LAE

WN

L03

HG

131

3166

.4-E

WL

RE

PLA

CE

ME

NT

IN B

RIA

R C

OU

RT

AR

EA

.GP

J L

AE

WN

L03.

GD

T 9

/9/1

6

NOHYDROCARBONODOR

NOHYDROCARBONODOR


Fill: Gray Sandy Clay w/ Shells

Brown Sand

Brown and gray Sandy Clay w/ Calcareousnodules

Brown and light gray Sandy Clay


0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PID

(ppm

)

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Blow CountRec./RQD

RemarksWell

ConstructionDep

th

Sam

ple

Lith

olo

gy

Description

Date Completed:

Checked By:

Driller:

Equipment:




9/8/16

NL

ALPINE

GEOPROBE


9/8/16

EH

0 0

- To:

- To:

- To:

- To:

From:

From:

From:

From:

Screen:

Pack:

Seal:

Grout:

Inner Casing:

Date Started:

Logged By:

Drilling Co.:

Method:

Boring Depth:

Initial GW Level:

Client:

Project:

Page 1 of 1



Job No.:HG1313166.4-E (WBS No. S-000035-0228-4)

Boring/Well:

5

10

5

10


Telephone:Fax:

LAE

WN

L03

HG

131

3166

.4-E

WL

RE

PLA

CE

ME

NT

IN B

RIA

R C

OU

RT

AR

EA

.GP

J L

AE

WN

L03.

GD

T 9

/9/1

6

NOHYDROCARBONODOR

NOHYDROCARBONODOR


Gray Sandy Clay w/ Shells

Brown Sandy Clay w/ Calcareous nodules

Brown Sandy Clay


0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PID

(ppm

)

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Blow CountRec./RQD

RemarksWell

ConstructionDep

th

Sam

ple

Lith

olo

gy

Description

Date Completed:

Checked By:

Driller:

Equipment:




9/8/16

NL

ALPINE

GEOPROBE


9/8/16

EH

0 0

- To:

- To:

- To:

- To:

From:

From:

From:

From:

Screen:

Pack:

Seal:

Grout:

Inner Casing:

Date Started:

Logged By:

Drilling Co.:

Method:

Boring Depth:

Initial GW Level:

Client:

Project:

Page 1 of 1



Job No.:HG1313166.4-E (WBS No. S-000035-0228-4)

Boring/Well:

5

10

5

10


Telephone:Fax:

LAE

WN

L03

HG

131

3166

.4-E

WL

RE

PLA

CE

ME

NT

IN B

RIA

R C

OU

RT

AR

EA

.GP

J L

AE

WN

L03.

GD

T 9

/9/1

6

NOHYDROCARBONODOR

NOHYDROCARBONODOR


Gray Sandy Clay


Brown Sandy Clay


0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PID

(ppm

)

Sam

ple

Num

ber

Blow CountRec./RQD

RemarksWell

ConstructionDep

th

Sam

ple

Lith

olo

gy

Description

Date Completed:

Checked By:

Driller:

Equipment:




9/8/16

NL

ALPINE

GEOPROBE


9/8/16

EH

0 0

- To:

- To:

- To:

- To:

From:

From:

From:

From:

Screen:

Pack:

Seal:

Grout:

Inner Casing:

Date Started:

Logged By:

Drilling Co.:

Method:

Boring Depth:

Initial GW Level:

Client:

Project:

Page 1 of 1



Job No.:HG1313166.4-E (WBS No. S-000035-0228-4)

Boring/Well:

5

10

5

10


Telephone:Fax:

LAE

WN

L03

HG

131

3166

.4-E

WL

RE

PLA

CE

ME

NT

IN B

RIA

R C

OU

RT

AR

EA

.GP

J L

AE

WN

L03.

GD

T 9

/9/1

6

APPENDIX C

ANALYTICAL LAB REPORT/CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION

16090375

10100 East Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, TX 77029 tel: 713-453-6060, fax: 713-453-6091, http://www.ablabs.com

Laboratory Analysis Report

Job ID :

Total Number of Pages: 23

City, State, Zip:

HG1313166.4-E / Water Line Replacement in Briar Court Area

Niem Ly

Client Address:

Client Name:

Client Project Name :

P.O.#.:

Sample Collected By:

16-0912H

6120 S. Dairy Ashford

HVJ AssociatesReport To :

Attn:

Houston, Texas, 77072

Niem Ly

Date Collected: 09/08/16

Client Sample ID A&B Sample ID

A&B Labs has analyzed the following samples...

Matrix

EB-1 (8-12') 16090375.01Soil

EB-2 (8-12') 16090375.02Soil

EB-3 (8-12') 16090375.03Soil

EB-4 (8-12') 16090375.04Soil

EB-5 (8-12') 16090375.05Soil

EB-6 (8-12') 16090375.06Soil

This report cannot be reproduced, except in full, without prior written permission of A&B Labs. Results shown relate only to the items tested. Samples are assumed to be inacceptable condition unless otherwise noted. Blank correction is not made unless otherwise noted. Air concentrations reported are based on field sampling information providedby client. Soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis unless otherwise noted. Uncertainty estimates are available on request.

9/15/2016

Title:

Released By:

Senior Project Manager

Shantall Carpenter

Date Received : 09/08/2016 14:42

This Laboratory is NELAP (T104704213-16-14) accredited. Effective: 04/01/2016; Expires: 03/31/2017

I am the laboratory manager, or his/her designee, and I am responsible for the release of this data package. This laboratory data package has beenreviewed and is complete and technically compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted in the attached exception reports.I affirm, to the best of my knowledge that all problems/anomalies observed by this laboratory (and if applicable, any and all laboratories subcontractedthrough this laboratory) that might affect the quality of the data, have been identified in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and that no information ordata have been knowingly withheld that would affect the quality of the data.

Date:

Scope: Non-Potable Water, Drinking Water, Air, Solid, Biological Tissue, Hazardous Waste

Page 1 of 23

General Term Definition

BRL

Front-Wt

Below Reporting Limit

Front Weight

Back WeightBack-Wt

cfu colony-forming units

Conc. Concentration

D.F. Dilution Factor

LCS Laboratory Check Standard

LCSD Laboratory Check Standard Duplicate

MS Matrix Spike

MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate

Molecular WeightMW

RPD

ppm parts per million

Relative Percent Difference

TNTC Too numerous to count

Post-Wt

Pre-Wt Previous Weight

Q Qualifier

RegLimit Regulatory Limit

RptLimit Reporting Limit

T Time

Post Weight

surr Surrogate

SDL Sample Detection Limit

16090375

L A B O R A T O R Y T E R M A N D Q U A L I F I E R D E F I N I T I O N R E P O R T

Date:Job ID : 9/15/2016

Qualifier Definition

Matrix Spike and/or Matrix Spike Duplicate recovery is below laboratory control limits.M9

LCS/LCSD RPD exceeds control limit. Recovery meets acceptance criteria.R4

Page 2 of 23

L A B O R A T O R Y T E S T R E S U L T S

Soil

16090375.01

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:

AnalystDate TimeQReg LimitRpt LimitDFUnitsResultParameter/Test DescriptionTest Method

EB-1 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:

HG1313166.4-E / Water Line Replacement in Briar Court AreaProject Name:

HVJ AssociatesClient Name:

Date16090375Job ID :

9/15/2016

09/08/16

12:15 14.2% Moisture

% MoistureSM 2540G

LEB09/12/16 14:450.11%14.2% Moisture

Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsTX 1005

VMN09/15/16 11:3827.10.98mg/KgBRLC6-C12

VMN09/15/16 11:3823.20.98mg/KgBRL>C12-C28

VMN09/15/16 11:3820.20.98mg/KgBRL>C28-C35

VMN09/15/16 11:380.98mg/KgBRLTotal C6-C35

VMN09/15/16 11:3860-1430.98%67.31-Chlorooctane(surr)

VMN09/15/16 11:3860-1500.98%71.8Chlorooctadecane(surr)

SW-846 8260C

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,1,1-Trichloroethane



JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,1-Dichloroethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,1-Dichloroethylene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,1-Dichloropropene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2,3-trichlorobenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2,3-Trichloropropane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2-Dibromoethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2-Dichlorobenzene


JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL1,2-Dichloropropane






JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL2-Chlorotoluene


JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRL4-Isopropyltoluene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLBenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLBromobenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLBromochloromethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLBromodichloromethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLBromoform

Soil results reported on dry weight basis

Page 3 of 23


Soil

16090375.01

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-1 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


SW-846 8260C

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLBromomethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLCarbon tetrachloride

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLChlorobenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLChloroethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLChloroform

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLChloromethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLcis-1,3-Dichloropropene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLDibromochloromethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLDibromomethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLDichlorodifluoromethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLEthylbenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLIsopropylbenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00920.79mg/KgBRLm- & p-Xylenes

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLMEK

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLMethylene chloride

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLNaphthalene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLn-Butylbenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLn-Propylbenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLo-Xylene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLsec-Butylbenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLStyrene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLt-butylbenzene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLTetrachloroethylene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLToluene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLTrichloroethylene

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLTrichlorofluoromethane

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00460.79mg/KgBRLVinyl Chloride

JKD09/13/16 10:270.00470.79mg/KgBRLXylenes

JKD09/13/16 10:2770-1300.79%1041,2-Dichloroethane-d4(surr)

JKD09/13/16 10:2770-1300.79%96.4Dibromofluoromethane(surr)

JKD09/13/16 10:2770-1300.79%111p-Bromofluorobenzene(surr)

JKD09/13/16 10:2770-1300.79%102Toluene-d8(surr)


Page 4 of 23


Soil

16090375.02

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-2 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


% MoistureSM 2540G

LEB09/12/16 14:450.11%18.2% Moisture


VMN09/15/16 08:3427.80.96mg/KgBRLC6-C12

VMN09/15/16 08:3423.80.96mg/KgBRL>C12-C28

VMN09/15/16 08:3420.80.96mg/KgBRL>C28-C35




SW-846 8260C































Page 5 of 23


Soil

16090375.02

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-2 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


SW-846 8260C















JKD09/13/16 11:000.00420.68mg/Kg0.01MEK






















Page 6 of 23


Soil

16090375.03

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-3 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


% MoistureSM 2540G

LEB09/12/16 14:450.11%13.2% Moisture


VMN09/15/16 09:00270.99mg/KgBRLC6-C12

VMN09/15/16 09:0023.20.99mg/KgBRL>C12-C28

VMN09/15/16 09:0020.20.99mg/KgBRL>C28-C35




SW-846 8260C































Page 7 of 23


Soil

16090375.03

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-3 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


SW-846 8260C















JKD09/13/16 11:320.0030.52mg/KgBRLMEK






















Page 8 of 23


Soil

16090375.04

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-4 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


% MoistureSM 2540G

LEB09/12/16 14:450.11%9.31% Moisture


VMN09/15/16 09:2626.11mg/KgBRLC6-C12

VMN09/15/16 09:2622.41mg/KgBRL>C12-C28

VMN09/15/16 09:2619.51mg/KgBRL>C28-C35

VMN09/15/16 09:261mg/KgBRLTotal C6-C35

VMN09/15/16 09:2660-1431%64.71-Chlorooctane(surr)

VMN09/15/16 09:2660-1501%63.8Chlorooctadecane(surr)

SW-846 8260C































Page 9 of 23


Soil

16090375.04

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-4 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


SW-846 8260C















JKD09/13/16 12:040.00310.56mg/KgBRLMEK


















JKD09/13/16 12:0470-1300.56%103Dibromofluoromethane(surr)


JKD09/13/16 12:0470-1300.56%99.4Toluene-d8(surr)


Page 10 of 23


Soil

16090375.05

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-5 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


% MoistureSM 2540G

LEB09/12/16 14:450.11%14.1% Moisture


VMN09/15/16 09:52291.05mg/KgBRLC6-C12

VMN09/15/16 09:5224.81.05mg/KgBRL>C12-C28

VMN09/15/16 09:5221.61.05mg/KgBRL>C28-C35




SW-846 8260C































Page 11 of 23


Soil

16090375.05

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-5 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


SW-846 8260C















JKD09/13/16 12:360.00290.50mg/KgBRLMEK






















Page 12 of 23


Soil

16090375.06

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-6 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


% MoistureSM 2540G

LEB09/12/16 14:450.11%12.9% Moisture


VMN09/15/16 10:4527.51.01mg/KgBRLC6-C12

VMN09/15/16 10:4523.51.01mg/KgBRL>C12-C28

VMN09/15/16 10:4520.51.01mg/KgBRL>C28-C35




SW-846 8260C































Page 13 of 23


Soil

16090375.06

Sample Matrix

Job Sample ID:


EB-6 (8-12')

Other Information:

Time Collected:

Client Sample ID:

Date Collected:

Niem LyAttn:




9/15/2016

09/08/16


SW-846 8260C















JKD09/13/16 13:080.00290.51mg/KgBRLMEK






















Page 14 of 23

Q U A L I T Y C O N T R O L C E R T I F I C A T E

Date :16090375Job ID :

LEBell

Samples in This QC Batch :

Qb16091250

% Moisture

16090375.01,02,03,04,05,06

Reporting Units :

09/12/16QC Batch ID :

Method :

Created Date :

Analysis :

Created By :

%SM 2540G

9/15/2016

Prep Date : 09/12/16 14:22SM 2540GPrep Method :PB16091226Sample Preparation : LEBellPrep By :

QC Type: Method Blank

D.F. RptLimitParameter Result Units QualCAS #

% 0.1BRL 1% Moisture

QC Type: Duplicate

16090372.01QC Sample ID:

Parameter UnitsSampleResult QualRPD

RPDCtrlLimit

QCSampleResult

%% Moisture 16.3 0.6 2016.4

Refer to the Definition page for terms.

Page 15 of 23



Jdongre


Qb16091430

Volatile Organic Compounds

16090375.01,02,03,04,05,06

Reporting Units :


Method :

Created Date :

Analysis :

Created By :

mg/KgSW-846 8260C

9/15/2016

Prep Date : 09/12/16 09:30SW-846 5035APrep Method :PB16091418Sample Preparation : JdongrePrep By :



mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2,3-trichlorobenzene 87-61-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropa 96-12-8

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8





mg/Kg 0.005BRL 12-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 14-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 14-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Benzene 71-43-2

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Bromobenzene 108-86-1

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Bromochloromethane 74-97-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Bromoform 75-25-2

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Bromomethane 74-83-9

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Chlorobenzene 108-90-7

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Chloroethane 75-00-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Chloroform 67-66-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Chloromethane 74-87-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-59-2

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Dibromomethane 74-95-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8


Page 16 of 23



Jdongre


Qb16091430


16090375.01,02,03,04,05,06

Reporting Units :


Method :

Created Date :

Analysis :

Created By :

mg/KgSW-846 8260C

9/15/2016



mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Ethylbenzene 100-41-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Isopropylbenzene 98-82-8

mg/Kg 0.01BRL 1m- & p-Xylenes 108-38-3&106-42-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1MEK 78-93-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Methylene chloride 75-09-2

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Naphthalene 91-20-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1n-Propylbenzene 103-65-1

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1o-Xylene 95-47-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Styrene 100-42-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1t-butylbenzene 98-06-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Toluene 108-88-3

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Trichloroethylene 79-01-6

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4

mg/Kg 0.005BRL 1Xylenes 1330-20-7

% 70-13097.3 1Dibromofluoromethane(surr 1868-53-7

% 70-130103 11,2-Dichloroethane-d4(surr 17060-07-0

% 70-130100 1Toluene-d8(surr) 2037-26-5

% 70-130111 1p-Bromofluorobenzene(surr 460-00-4

%RecoveryCtrlLimit

LCSDResult

LCSResult

RPDCtrlLimitRPD

LCSSpk Added

LCSD% Rec

LCS% RecParameter

LCSDSpk Added

QC Type: LCS and LCSD

Qual

0.01000.02 71.4-131100 300.021,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.02 0.02

5.1950.02 69.6-140100 300.021,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.02 0.019

4.91050.02 66.6-128100 300.021,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.02 0.021

0.01000.02 72.8-125100 300.021,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 72.7-129100 300.021,1-Dichloroethane 0.02 0.02

0.0950.02 71.4-13195 300.0191,1-Dichloroethylene 0.02 0.019

0.01000.02 75.9-132100 300.021,1-Dichloropropene 0.02 0.02

4.91050.02 56.7-153100 300.021,2,3-trichlorobenzene 0.02 0.021

0.01050.02 61.6-138105 300.0211,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.02 0.021

0.01000.02 55.9-150100 300.021,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.02 0.02

0.01100.02 71.1-131110 300.0221,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.02 0.022

4.71100.02 52.4-150105 300.0211,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropa 0.02 0.022

0.01050.02 72.9-125105 300.0211,2-Dibromoethane 0.02 0.021


Page 17 of 23



Jdongre


Qb16091430


16090375.01,02,03,04,05,06

Reporting Units :


Method :

Created Date :

Analysis :

Created By :

mg/KgSW-846 8260C

9/15/2016

%RecoveryCtrlLimit

LCSDResult

LCSResult

RPDCtrlLimitRPD

LCSSpk Added

LCSD% Rec

LCS% RecParameter

LCSDSpk Added


Qual

4.91050.02 76.1-126100 300.021,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.02 0.021

0.01000.02 66.4-134100 300.021,2-Dichloroethane 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 70.2-128100 300.021,2-Dichloropropane 0.02 0.02

0.01100.02 75.1-127110 300.0221,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.02 0.022





0.01100.02 71.7-128110 300.0222-Chlorotoluene 0.02 0.022

0.01100.02 72.2-126110 300.0224-Chlorotoluene 0.02 0.022

0.01100.02 77.5-125110 300.0224-Isopropyltoluene 0.02 0.022

0.01000.02 74-126100 300.02Benzene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 73.3-129100 300.02Bromobenzene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 68.8-131100 300.02Bromochloromethane 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 69-135100 300.02Bromodichloromethane 0.02 0.02

4.91050.02 62-146100 300.02Bromoform 0.02 0.021

0.0950.02 58.7-13995 300.019Bromomethane 0.02 0.019

0.0950.02 68.7-13595 300.019Carbon tetrachloride 0.02 0.019

0.01000.02 73.3-129100 300.02Chlorobenzene 0.02 0.02

0.0950.02 66.2-12995 300.019Chloroethane 0.02 0.019

0.01000.02 73.7-134100 300.02Chloroform 0.02 0.02

0.0900.02 51.4-13590 300.018Chloromethane 0.02 0.018

0.01000.02 72.4-132100 300.02cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 67.7-134100 300.02cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 73.2-126100 300.02Dibromochloromethane 0.02 0.02

4.91000.02 69.9-134105 300.021Dibromomethane 0.02 0.02

5.4900.02 36.8-14495 300.019Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.02 0.018

0.01000.02 72.2-128100 300.02Ethylbenzene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 71.2-131100 300.02Isopropylbenzene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.04 70.7-131100 300.04m- & p-Xylenes 0.04 0.04

4.91050.02 52.5-152100 300.02MEK 0.02 0.021

0.01050.02 70.6-129105 300.021Methylene chloride 0.02 0.021

0.01100.02 60.7-145110 300.022Naphthalene 0.02 0.022

0.01050.02 66.5-136105 300.021n-Butylbenzene 0.02 0.021

0.01100.02 73.3-126110 300.022n-Propylbenzene 0.02 0.022

0.01000.02 71.6-130100 300.02o-Xylene 0.02 0.02

4.71050.02 77.9-124110 300.022sec-Butylbenzene 0.02 0.021

0.01000.02 71.1-131100 300.02Styrene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 74.4-130100 300.02t-butylbenzene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 62.6-157100 300.02Tetrachloroethylene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 73.3-127100 300.02Toluene 0.02 0.02


Page 18 of 23



Jdongre


Qb16091430


16090375.01,02,03,04,05,06

Reporting Units :


Method :

Created Date :

Analysis :

Created By :

mg/KgSW-846 8260C

9/15/2016

%RecoveryCtrlLimit

LCSDResult

LCSResult

RPDCtrlLimitRPD

LCSSpk Added

LCSD% Rec

LCS% RecParameter

LCSDSpk Added


Qual

5.1950.02 80-120100 300.02trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.02 0.019

0.01000.02 71.5-124100 300.02trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.02 0.02

0.01000.02 69.2-133100 300.02Trichloroethylene 0.02 0.02

33.3750.02 63.9-140105 300.021Trichlorofluoromethane 0.02 0.015 R4

0.01000.02 40.9-159100 300.02Vinyl Chloride 0.02 0.02

0.01000.06 69.2-133100 300.06Xylenes 0.06 0.06

QC Type: MS and MSD


ParameterSampleResult

RPDCtrlLimit

MSResult

MSSpk Added RPD Qual

MS% Rec

MSDSpk Added

MSD% Rec

%RecCtrlLimit

MSDResult

BRL1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 71.4-13195

BRL1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 69.6-14095

BRL1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.02 95 5.10.02 0.020.019 35 66.6-128100

BRL1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.02 100 0.00.02 0.020.02 35 72.8-125100

BRL1,1-Dichloroethane 0.02 100 0.00.02 0.020.02 35 72.7-129100

BRL1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.02 105 4.90.02 0.020.021 35 71.4-131100

BRL1,1-Dichloropropene 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 75.9-13295

BRL1,2,3-trichlorobenzene 0.02 90 0.00.02 0.0180.018 35 56.7-15390

BRL1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.02 95 5.10.02 0.020.019 35 61.6-138100

BRL1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.02 85 0.00.02 0.0170.017 35 55.9-15085

BRL1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 71.1-13190

BRL1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropa 0.02 90 5.40.02 0.0190.018 35 52.4-15095

BRL1,2-Dibromoethane 0.02 95 5.10.02 0.020.019 35 72.9-125100

BRL1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 76.1-12695

BRL1,2-Dichloroethane 0.02 100 0.00.02 0.020.02 35 66.4-134100

BRL1,2-Dichloropropane 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 70.2-12895

BRL1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 75.1-12790





BRL2-Chlorotoluene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 71.7-12895

BRL4-Chlorotoluene 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 72.2-12690

BRL4-Isopropyltoluene 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 77.5-12590

BRLBenzene 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 74-12695

BRLBromobenzene 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 73.3-12995

BRLBromochloromethane 0.02 105 0.00.02 0.0210.021 35 68.8-131105

BRLBromodichloromethane 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 69-13595

BRLBromoform 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 62-14695


Page 19 of 23



Jdongre


Qb16091430


16090375.01,02,03,04,05,06

Reporting Units :


Method :

Created Date :

Analysis :

Created By :

mg/KgSW-846 8260C

9/15/2016

QC Type: MS and MSD



RPDCtrlLimit

MSResult


MS% Rec

MSDSpk Added

MSD% Rec

%RecCtrlLimit

MSDResult

BRLBromomethane 0.02 105 0.00.02 0.0210.021 35 58.7-139105

BRLCarbon tetrachloride 0.02 90 0.00.02 0.0180.018 35 68.7-13590

BRLChlorobenzene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 73.3-12995

BRLChloroethane 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 66.2-12995

BRLChloroform 0.02 100 0.00.02 0.020.02 35 73.7-134100

BRLChloromethane 0.02 105 100.02 0.0190.021 35 51.4-13595

BRLcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.02 100 0.00.02 0.020.02 35 72.4-132100

BRLcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.02 90 5.70.02 0.0170.018 35 67.7-13485

BRLDibromochloromethane 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 73.2-12695

BRLDibromomethane 0.02 100 0.00.02 0.020.02 35 69.9-134100

BRLDichlorodifluoromethane 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 36.8-14490

BRLEthylbenzene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 72.2-12895

BRLIsopropylbenzene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 71.2-13195

BRLm- & p-Xylenes 0.04 97.5 2.60.04 0.0380.039 35 70.7-13195

BRLMEK 0.02 90 5.40.02 0.0190.018 35 52.5-15295

BRLMethylene chloride 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 70.6-12990

BRLNaphthalene 0.02 95 5.10.02 0.020.019 35 60.7-145100

BRLn-Butylbenzene 0.02 90 5.70.02 0.0170.018 35 66.5-13685

BRLn-Propylbenzene 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 73.3-12690

BRLo-Xylene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 71.6-13095

BRLsec-Butylbenzene 0.02 95 5.40.02 0.0180.019 35 77.9-12490

BRLStyrene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 71.1-13195

BRLt-butylbenzene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 74.4-13095

BRLTetrachloroethylene 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 62.6-15795

BRLToluene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 73.3-12795

BRLtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.02 100 5.10.02 0.0190.02 35 70-13095

BRLtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.02 85 0.00.02 0.0170.017 35 71.5-12485

BRLTrichloroethylene 0.02 95 0.00.02 0.0190.019 35 69.2-13395

BRLTrichlorofluoromethane 0.02 80 M9,R4370.02 0.0110.016 35 63.9-14055

BRLVinyl Chloride 0.02 95 5.10.02 0.020.019 35 40.9-159100

BRLXylenes 0.06 96.7 1.70.06 0.0570.058 35 69.2-13395


Page 20 of 23



VNair


Qb16091507

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

16090375.01,02,03,04,05,06

Reporting Units :


Method :

Created Date :

Analysis :

Created By :

mg/KgTX 1005

9/15/2016

Prep Date : 09/14/16 15:00SW-846 5035APrep Method :PB16091505Sample Preparation : VNairPrep By :



mg/Kg 23.7BRL 1C6-C12 TPH-1005-1

mg/Kg 20.3BRL 1>C12-C28 TPH-1005-2

mg/Kg 17.7BRL 1>C28-C35 TPH-1005-4

mg/KgBRL 1Total C6-C35

% 60-15094.3 1Chlorooctadecane(surr) 3386-33-2

% 60-14387.1 11-Chlorooctane(surr) 111-85-3

%RecoveryCtrlLimit

LCSDResult

LCSResult

RPDCtrlLimitRPD

LCSSpk Added

LCSD% Rec

LCS% RecParameter

LCSDSpk Added


Qual

2.176.8500 75-12578.4 20392C6-C12 500 384

5.180.4500 75-12584.6 20423>C12-C28 500 402

12.383.6500 75-12594.6 20473>C28-C35 500 418

QC Type: MS and MSD



RPDCtrlLimit

MSResult


MS% Rec

MSDSpk Added

MSD% Rec

%RecCtrlLimit

MSDResult

BRLC6-C12 490 83.7 10.2490 454410 20 75-12592.7

BRL>C12-C28 490 78.2 0.5490 385383 20 75-12578.6

BRL>C28-C35 490 82.9 6.2490 432406 20 75-12588.2


Page 21 of 23

Sample Condition Checklist

pH Paper ID : n/a Thermometer ID : 140539631

Sample pH : n/a Temperature : 1.0+0.5cf=1.5°C

Client Name : HVJ Associates

Time Received : 2:42PMDate Received : 09/08/2016 A&B JobID : 16090375

Received 6 pre weighed vials and a 4oz bulk jar per sample, terra core method 5035. -AR 09.08.2016

Comments : Include actions taken to resolve discrepancies/problem:

X Has client been contacted about sub-out18

X Sample accepted.17.

X VOA vials completely filled.16.

X Samples were received within the hold time.15.

X Sample volume is sufficient for analyses requested.14.

X Bottle count on C-O-C matches bottles found.13.

X Sample ID labels match C-O-C ID's12.

X All samples were logged or labeled.11.

X Sample(s) were received with proper preservative10.

X Sample(s) were received in appropriate container(s).9.

Matrix:

Sludge Cassette Tube BulkSolidLiquidSoilWater Badge Food Other8.

X Sample containers arrived intact. (If no comment).7.

X Sample(s) received with signed sample custody seal.6.

X C-O-C signed and dated.5.

X Sample(s) received with chain-of-custody.4.

X If yes, ice in cooler.3.

X Sample(s) in a cooler.2.

X Cooler seal present and signed.1.

N/ANoYesCheck Points

Received by : Check in by/date : AReyes / 09/08/2016AReyes

Phone : www.ablabs.com 713-453-6060

Page 23 of 23

APPENDIX D

WASTE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION

SPECIAL WASTE PROFILE

I. Generator Information

II. Billing Information

III. Waste Stream Information

IV. Representative Sample Certification

Sample ID Numbers:

phase ii environmental site assessment report … · environmental site assessment report water...

Documents