personalized medicine: current and future perspectives personalized medicine: current and future...
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Personalized Medicine: Current and Future Perspectives
Patricia Deverka, MD, MBeDuke University, Institute for Genome Sciences and
PolicyRick J. Carlson, JD
University of Washington
Background
• Pat Deverka– Fellow at Duke’s Center for Genome Ethics, Law and Policy– Member of PMC– Preventive Medicine, outcomes research, health economics
research, bioethics– Industry experience
• Rick Carlson• --Clinical Professor, Department of Health Services, Affiliate
Professor, Department of Pharmacy, School of Public Health, University of Washington
• --Advisor, Public Policy, UW Genomics Research Projects; • --Advisor on Stakeholder positions, CDC, HRSA, NHGRI• --35 years, Health Care industry experience
Personalized Medicine
• What is It: definitions
• What are some examples
• What are the key issues confronting health care system stakeholders
• What are the major policy issues
• What does it mean for you
What Is It?
• Personalized health care is a broad term for interventions that are targeted to individuals based on their risk in order to provide a more coherent and focused approach to health care. Personalized health care includes preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions, with risk defined through genetics as well as clinical and family histories.*
• More technology-focused definition relies on use of molecular testing to define risk, e.g., genetics, genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.
• Goals include greater effectiveness and efficiency of health care delivery as well as improved health outcomes and quality of life
*Kathyrn Phillips, UCSF
Personalized Medicine: Vision vs. Reality
• Disruptive developments in science and technology
• Convergence of molecular biology, genetics, advanced technology, bioinformatics, broadband
• “Team science”• Transformational changes in medicine
– Molecular-based products and services– Shift towards prevention – Reclassification of disease – Integration and coordination– IT solutions; Interoperability – Consumer-centered– Premise that knowledge will change behavior
• Huge public & private investments in R&D• Health as a national asset• Ethical, legal and policy issues addressed in
parallel with the science
• Healthcare delivery focused on “sick care”– Standardization for quality improvement
• Fragmented, lack of coordination• Costs growing and unsustainable
– Pressures of expensive new technologies– Aging population in search of new services– Millions of Americans under- or uninsured
– Employer-based system tenuous– No evidence of healthier citizenry
• Inefficient use of information– Lack of IT investment, connectivity
• Evidence base for medicine inadequate– Continuing debate about role of cost-effectiveness
• Huge provider knowledge gaps re genomics• Complicated regulatory framework• Reimbursement hurdles and uncertainties• Powerful stakeholders in current system resist
change
©2005 RALPH SNYDERMAN
Tools Needed for Prediction and Personalized Care
Dis
ease
Bur
den
Time
Cos
t
1/re
vers
ibili
ty
Typical Current
Intervention
Earliest Clinical
Detection
Earliest Molecular Detection
Initiating Events
Baseline Risk
Decision Support Tools:
Baseline Risk Preclinical Progression
Disease Initiation and Progression
Assess Risk Refine Assessment Predict/Diagnose Monitor Progression
Predict Events
Inform Therapeutics
Sources of New Biomarkers:
Stable Genomics: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Haplotype Mapping Gene Sequencing
Dynamic Genomics: Gene ExpressionProteomics Metabolomics Molecular Imaging
Therapeutic Decision Support
©2005 RALPH SNYDERMAN
Prospective Health Care
Risk Assessment and Decision Support Tools
Personal Lifestyle Plan
Disease Management
Risk Modification
Dis
ease
Bur
den
Time
Low Risk High Risk
Early Chronic
Cos
t
1/re
vers
ibili
ty
Personalized Health Plan
Late Chronic
Participating Population
What are some examples?
Biomarker Application
Her-2/neu receptor Select Herceptin (trastuzumab) for breast cancer
BRCA1/2 Breast and ovarian cancer inherited risk, prophylactic tamoxifen and surgery
Transcriptional profile – 21 genes Avoid use of chemotherapy in breast CA patients with low risk of recurrence
CYP2D6/CYP2D19 Guide prescribing/ adjust dose of ~25% of commonly used drugs
VKOR/CYP2C9 Dosing of warfarin
The Leading Edge: Pharmacogenomics (PGx)
• Using an individual’s genetic profile to predict response to certain drugs
• Clinical goal is to enable better drug treatment decisions and safer medical care
• Pharmaceutical industry goal is to develop more predictable and more effective drugs
• Genetic tests already in use to predict patient response to therapy in the fields of cancer and infectious disease
• PGx has the potential to revolutionize how drugs are developed and prescribed in the future
• Faces fewest hurdles to clinical integration because does not require major healthcare delivery system redesign
Key distinctions between PGx testing and traditional genetic testing
Disease predisposition testing often does not have an obvious treatment
For PGx testing, an FDA approved drug is the treatment - goal is an adjustment in what managed care is already covering
Less likely to create new consumer demand for services
PGx more likely to be cost-effective in short-term as the treatments and alternatives are known
If PGx testing has adequate +/- predictive value, may be unethical to prescribe without testing
Key Stakeholder Positions
Private Payers
• Poor understanding of genomics;• Poor and inconsistent technology assessment• Apprehensive about specialty drug prices• Most don’t see the business case yet• Assessing proportional value for diagnostic
health information• More prepared for PGx than predictive testing
Decreased healthcare costsDecreased healthcare costsAvoid use of expensive drugs in Avoid use of expensive drugs in
non-respondersnon-respondersSave patients avoidable adverse Save patients avoidable adverse
effectseffectsImprove complianceImprove compliance
Improved health outcomesImproved health outcomesSystem cost offsetsSystem cost offsets
Decreased healthcare costsDecreased healthcare costsAvoid use of expensive drugs in Avoid use of expensive drugs in
non-respondersnon-respondersSave patients avoidable adverse Save patients avoidable adverse
effectseffectsImprove complianceImprove compliance
Improved health outcomesImproved health outcomesSystem cost offsetsSystem cost offsets
Increased healthcare costsIncreased healthcare costsHigher drug pricesHigher drug prices
Expanded patient populations for Expanded patient populations for drugsdrugs
Enforcement of privacy Enforcement of privacy safeguardssafeguards
Extended patent protectionExtended patent protectionDiagnostic tests requiredDiagnostic tests required
Increased healthcare costsIncreased healthcare costsHigher drug pricesHigher drug prices
Expanded patient populations for Expanded patient populations for drugsdrugs
Enforcement of privacy Enforcement of privacy safeguardssafeguards
Extended patent protectionExtended patent protectionDiagnostic tests requiredDiagnostic tests required
Payer perspective: what will be the impact of pharmacogenomics on total healthcare costs?
Providers, Physicians
• Lack of genetics literacy• Intensifying payer pressures for evidence-based
practice and the lag in Genomics R&D• Lack of IT designed for docs, “how to deliver”
genomics; specialization or primary care• The problematic economics of personalized
medicine; will reimbursement match the time it takes to target?
Developers of Bio-Pharmaceutical Products and Services
• Need to make the business case payers won’t make for them;
• Quantifying the value of information;
• Work out relationships between Rx and DX;
• Participate vigorously in policy for technology assessment and regulatory model development.
Government
• Need for proactive policy
• Lead IT and standardization
• CMS to jawbone; fix the FDA
• Proportionate funding for “translational” work
• Keep pushing IT and align IP with genomics agenda
• Facilitate early bioethics dialog
Consumers
• First, distinguish between those who are sick and everyone else; very differing views; both to be respected
• Beginning to “think” genetics• Need for trusted information, access and choice• Fears of exploitation, aggravation of existing
disparities, and job and health care discrimination
• Bio-engineering soon?
Emerging ethical, legal, policy ( ELP) issues
ELP concerns in clinical research
• Informed consent in the era of DNA banking• Privacy and confidentiality concerns
– Degree of anonymization is critical– Procedures to limit unauthorized disclosures– Potential for discrimination
• Harms to families or groups– Collateral information– Race-related information
• Stratification – Orphan subgroups– Genetically homogenous groups resulting in less safety data
• Incentive structure– IP issues– Focus by pharmaceutical companies on new drugs, rather than
marketed drugs (branded and generic)
PGx research requires creation of biorepositories linking genotypic and
phenotypic information– Informed consent framework adapting to unique aspects of biorepositories– Shift in emphasis from protecting subjects from physical harms to primarily
informational harms – Consent to all unspecified future research studies (blanket consent) may not be
considered sufficient to meet the standards of informed consent• Difficulties associated with reconsent procedures
– Exclusive focus on the individual research subject is arbitrary from an ethical standpoint
– Recognition of potential for group harms, even with anonymized samples– Debate over the importance of research participants having some measure of
control over the research done with their stored tissue– Narrow criteria for recontact and disclosure of results
• Do investigators have a duty to contact participants years after a study is completed?– Separation of informed consent for collection and storage of tissue samples for
PGx testing from participation in clinical trials
ELP issues in clinical practice• Marketplace introduction of PGx testing without adequate validation
– Lack appropriate regulatory framework– Failure to define a clinically and economically relevant evidence base for PGx tests and test-
drug combinations• Suboptimal access to and use of PGx testing
– Professional and payer knowledge gaps about genetics– Defining physician obligations to offer a PGx test and obligations to follow PGx test results
Liability – Physicians, pharmacists, pharmaceutical companies
• Testing without adequate consent• Inappropriate uses of PGx testing as a result of direct marketing (DTC advertising)• Secondary information conveyed by PGx results that may produce psychosocial
harms– Likelihood of other diseases; Progression of current disease– Unsolicited information about family members
• Discriminatory uses of PGx information by third parties– Insurers/Employers - based on belief that disease cannot be adequately treated given
currently available therapies or based on knowledge of disease predisposition• Higher drug costs leading to barriers to access
Rapid and unmanaged introduction of genetic tests into marketplace
• Inappropriately induces demand for services• Hype
– Reinforces notion of genetic determinism and essentialism
• Predictive values of PGx tests may be too low to be clinically useful– Shift public and private resources away from more effective
ways of improving public health
• Lack of information about PGx tests may lead to real harms to patients by physicians and payers– Inaccurate test results– Poor counseling from physicians (unable to accurately interpret
test results)– Coverage policies that are not justified by the science
When might direct consumer access to PGx testing be permissible?
• When tests meet appropriate standards of analytic and clinical validity and results are conveyed in an accurate and understandable manner
• When test contains information about response to over-the-counter drugs, dietary regimens, etc
• When individual has insurance coverage for the drug, but not the corresponding PGx test
• When individuals are concerned about stigmatization or discrimination
• DISSENTING OPINION: None of the above.
What Are the Major Policy Issues?
• Costs, overall, and specialty drugs---constraints on research
• Regulatory reform• Access and equity concerns• The uses of genetic information• Setting levels for regulation and evidence for
public payment• Provider and consumer literacy• Significant bioethical issues.
What Does it Mean for You?
• Your experience, however painful, becomes the experience of everybody
• The economics of health care services suppress basic public research $$$’s
• An orphan disease for everyone; managed care must solve the coverage challenge of allocating resources in an era of specialty drugs
PM requires coordination across multiple stakeholders
Producers
ConsumersPGX
Diagnostic Companies
Government & Universities Biopharmaceutical Co’s
Genetics Companies
(data miners, technology co’s, etc.
Patients and HC
consumers
Healthcare Professionals Managed
Care
Payers
Ethicists, Legislators