24 September2013

PERSEUS a large research initiative

addressing complex challenges through new capabilities

DG Enterprise and Industry paolo.salieri@ec.europa.eu

P. Salieri

Outline of Presentation

EU Security Research in FP7 (as related to Maritime Border Surveillance)

PERSEUS

Outlook for Security Research in Horizon 2020

EU R&D

Policy objectives:

Contribute to setting up a European Research Area,

Support the implementation of EU policies,

Support the competitiveness of the EU Industry.

PRINCIPLES:

• Collaborative R&D Min 3 entities from 3 countries (EU

and associated)

• Competitive selection of projects based on independent

Peer Review

• Grants (subvention): calls for proposals (shared costs,

IPR to proposers)

4

Security

1.400 M€

4% of FP7 CP

Space

1.400 M€

4% of FP7 CP

Energy

2.350 M€

7% of FP7 CP

Socio-economics

623 M€

2% of FP7 CP

Environment

1.890 M€

6% of FP7 CP

ICT

9.050 M€

28% of FP7 CP

Transport

4.160 M€

13% of FP7 CP

NMT

3.475M€

11% of FP7

CP

Food

1.935 M€

6% of FP7 CP

Health

6.100 M€

19% of FP7 CP

FP7 Cooperation Programme: 32.413 M€

The 10 Themes

MISSION DRIVEN R&D

Develop technologies and produce knowledge to reduce capabilities gaps

Overcome fragmentation of markets

Stimulate collaboration between technology providers and users

4 Missions

Security of citizens

Security of infrastructure and utilities

Intelligent surveillance and border security

Restoring security and safety in case of crisis

FP7-Security Research (2007-2013):

1,400 Mio EUR (20% to SMEs

20% to border security)

More than 250 projects and 2,500 participants

EU funding: 40% of total European funding

Research routes in R&D for Maritime (Border) Security

System development and validation

- Combination of capabilities

- Mission specific

SEABILLA (10 M€ EC contr.)

I2C (10 M€ EC contr.)

CLOSEYE (9 M€ EC contr.)

Systems of systems demonstration

- Combination of IP results

- Multi-mission

-Demonstration Programme

PERSEUS (27 M€ EC contr.)

Capability development

- Technology development (e.g.

detection) -> (WIMAAS, AMASS,

SECTRONIC) -Road mapping:

OPERAMAR POV CISE ?

Challenge for R&D in support to policy

Today: in average 5-6

yrs from definition of

R&D topics to project

completion.

Projects to feed results

of R&D to policy setting

Need to minimize this

interval and

synchronize with

interval of policy

making and

implementation

Internal Security Strategy -implementation

Threat assessment:

MS, EEAS (SitCen),

agencies

Monitoring

and evaluation:

EP, Council, COSI,

COM annual report

Implementation:

MS, COM, agencies

Decision making:

EP and Council

Policy development:

COM with EEAS

Operational planning: COSI,

COM, EEAS (e.g. CSDP missions)

9

10

Topic SEC-2010.3.1-1 European-wide integrated maritime border control system – phase II

For the 2015 time horizon, innovative solutions should be set up to permanently monitor and track all type of ship traffics, vulnerable lanes and extended border zones, and to detect abnormal behaviour to understand and identify risks and threats at an early stage and to respond as appropriate (in full respect of human rights and in particular of asylum seekers).

This future generation of maritime surveillance capabilities should allow:

• Permanent and all weather coverage of maritime areas;

• Continuous collection and fusion of heterogeneous data provided by various types of sensors and other intelligent information from external information sources;

• Supervised automatic detection of abnormal vessel behaviours (tracks and activities) and to generate documented alarms;

• Understanding of suspicious events and early identification of risks and threats from series of detected spatiotemporal abnormal vessel behaviours (alarms);

• Detection and tracking of scrapping vessels used for illegal migration;

• Detecting and preventing illicit movements of persons and goods through multilayered and end-to-end surveillance.

By the 2015 time horizon significant technical progress is expected with respect to wide maritime area coverage, combining different sets of sensors and platforms, heterogeneous data processing and fusion, using new methodologies for detecting

abnormal behaviours. 11

Topic SEC-2010.3.1-1 European-wide integrated maritime border control system – phase II

The most important challenges were identified as:

- detection of small craft,

- fusion of information in order to detect anomalies,

- interoperability,

- affordability.

"to be initially tested at a selected portion of the maritime external borders of the European Union" …

"in a pre-operational scenario, to be defined by representatives of institutional users belonging to different Member States" …

"Tthe research nature of the proposed DP implies restricting its perimeter to one or a number of demonstration exercises in a clearly identified place and time, specifying the target (or targets), the threats and the associated scenarios".

12

PERSEUS

Protection of European seas and borders through the intelligent use of surveillance Topic: 3.2-02 (2010) www.perseus-fp7.eu

Content: Design of a system of systems architecture integrating surveillance systems to address complex security missions, focusing on irregular migration and trafficking.

• Funding: 27,847,579 Euros

Consortium:INDRA SISTEMAS (ES), CASSIDIAN (FR), DCNS (FR), ENGINEERING (IT), ISDEFE

(ES), EADS-CASA (ES), DEMOKRITOS” (GR), GUARDIA CIVIL (ES), PRIO (NO), SAAB (SE), SES-ASTRA (LU), AJECO (FI), INTUILAB (FR), METEOSIM (ES), LUXSPACE (LU), SOFRESUD (FR), INOV (PT), SKYTEK (IE), LAUREA (FI), DFRC (CH), BOEING R&T EUROPE (ES), ECORYS (NL) , CORK INST. OF TECHNOLOGY (IE), MOI France (FR), FORÇA AÉREA PORTUGUESA (PT), SATWAYS (GR), MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GREECE (GR), MINISTRY OF CITIZENS PROTECTION (GR), CMRE (NATO)

Expected outcome:

* A system of systems representative of what would be available from 2015;

* A target vision for an integrated European maritime border surveillance system;

* A set of recommendations and best practices to instantiate this target vision in different contexts and to extend it to more countries, testing CONOPS being defined at Frontex, based on the users and providers feedbacks acquired through two real-life exercises operating in the Western and Eastern Mediterranean regions

14

PERSEUS Roadmap – Present Status

Step 0 - Define & Deploy 2011 Design phase to elaborate the PERSEUS target vision.

Step 1 – 2013 Validate Western Campaign Demonstration

Step 2 – 2014 Validate

Eastern Campaign Demonstration

Step 3 – 2014 Contribute

Set-up and propose a European "standard" for Maritime Surveillance Systems for 2015/2020

Today

15

PERSEUS West Campaign

On-going

Exercise 1:

Communication of

Perseus nodes

Exercise 3: Alboran Sea

Exercise 2: Canary Islands

Exercise 4: West

Mediterranean Basin

1st Half 2013

2nd Half 2013

16

West Campaign Systems and Assets- Real exercises

Asset Description

MPA Maritime Surveillance Platform CN 235

CPV Guardia Civil Patrol Boat

TOPV Transoceanic Patrol Vessel

LOPV Light optionally patrolled vehicle

Coastal Station Radar and Infrared Sensors

MSU Mobile Surveillance Unit

PSR Air surveillance radar

Other AIS and Satellite stations, Meteo services

Threat Rubber boats for simulation of Cayucos

National Coordination Center (NCC) Perseus Work Station

Regional Coordination Center (RCC) Perseus Work Station

Local Coordination Center (LCC) Perseus Work Station

17

West Campaign - Real exercises- Example of scenario

Demand Driven R&D: POV Topics

Pre-Operational Validation invites Public Authorities in cooperation to assess in a realistic user-defined operational scenario the performance levels of innovative technological solutions and their fitness for purpose.

As a test bed for future initiatives in Horizon 2020,

Call FP7-SEC-2012-1 Indicative budget: M€ 10 Topic SEC-2012.3.1-2

Pre-Operational Validation (POV) at EU level of common application of surveillance tools at sea - CLOSEYE

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Topic SEC-2013.5.3-2 Testing the interoperability of maritime surveillance systems - Pre-Operational Validation (POV)

Solution 1 Guardia Civil (ES)

Guardia Nacional

Republicana (PT)

Marina Militare (IT),

Guardia di Finanza

Associated to ASI (IT) as

3rd party

EU Satellite Center

Public

authorities

100% EU

75 % EU

100% EU

Solution 2

Solution X

Vision, Validation Strategy

Document

leading to publication & evaluation

of Call for Tenders

Development Testing

and implementation

ISDEFE (ES) as Common

Entity to procure tests to

be validated

Joint Validation

and Conclusions

STEP 1:

Definition Phase

STEP 2:

Execution Phase

STEP 3:

Assessment Phase

CSA CP CSA

POV CLOSEYE (EC Contr. 9.2 M€)

Funding rate

LESSONS being learnt

Security Authorities realise that demand based R&D approach can bring them benefits.

However:

Big effort (both by EC and participants) needed to mobilise demand side constituency. Much more for a POV project than for a collaborative R&D project.

For authorities to be motivated strong (political) support is needed at national level. Encouraging a consortium of Member States to jointly approach the supply side (and take joint liability for R&D investments) requires much more commitment than encouraging "typical" participants in FP7 to file a grant application to recuperate a percentage of costs of R&D

Economic crisis made it more difficult to leverage additional resources

Horizon 2020

European Security Strategy (Solana-2003)

Internal Security Strategy (2010)

• Serious and organised Crime

• Terrorism

• Cyber Security / Crime

• Border Control

• Natural and man-made disasters

EU Cyber Security Strategy (2013)

Innovation Union (2010): Strengthen the innovation chain and boost levels of investment throughout the Union

Maritime Security Strategy?

SECURITY Societal Challenge: political environment

22

23

"Secure Society" in Horizon 2020

Mission areas

1. Fighting crime and terrorism

2. Strengthening security through border management

3. Providing cyber security

4. Increasing Europe’s resilience to disasters

5. Ensuring privacy in the Internet and enhancing the societal dimension

6. CFSP related issues (‘dual-use’ research)

24

"Secure Society" in Horizon 2020

Implementation aspects

Mission driven approach maintained

Civilian Focus

Strengthened coordination with relevant EU-Agencies: FRONTEX, EUROPOL, ENISA, EMSA, etc.

Security challenge and technology development

EU Council (e.g. recent conclusions on strengthening the internal security authorities' involvement in security-related research and industrial policy (9814/13)) recognizes importance of using modern and adequate technologies in the field of internal security, "which necessitates an increased involvement of internal security authorities in research and a proactive involvement with suppliers of modern security technologies".

25

Outlook for 1st call

• End June 2013 political agreement on H-2020

• Autumn 2013: consultations with the MS on work

programme

• WP being drafted

• 1st call winter 2013

Security research in H-2020

PCP - Pre-Commercial Procurement

What •Public sector buys R&D to steer development of solutions to its needs, gather info about pros / cons of alternative solutions.

When Challenge requires R&D to get new solutions developed. Problem clear, but pros / cons of several potential competing solutions not compared / validated yet.

How Public sector buys R&D from several suppliers in parallel (comparing alternative solution approaches), in form of competition evaluating progress after critical milestones (design, prototyping, test phase), risks & benefits of R&D (e.g. IPRs) shared with suppliers to maximise incentives for commercialisation.

Supplier B

Supplier C

Supplier D

Phase 1 Solution design

Phase 2

Prototype

development

Phase 3 Original development of limited volume of first test products / services Supplier A

Supplier B

Supplier C

Supplier D

Supplier B

Phase 0 Curiosity Driven Research

R&D / Pre-commercial Procurement (PCP)

Phase 4 Deployment of commercial end-products Diffusion of newly developed products / services

Supplier D

Public Procurement of

Innovative Solutions (PPI)

PCP to steer development of solutions towards concrete public sector needs, whilst comparing/validating alternative solution approaches from various vendors

PPI to act as launching customer / early adopter / first buyer of innovative commercial end-solutions newly arriving on the market

… in line with WTO proc. rules, EU Treaty, State aid free

Supplier(s)

A,B,C,D

and/or X

Also normally multiple sourcing here, to keep competition going

PCP and PPI Complementary tools in Horizon 2020

Status of PCP implementation across Europe (May 2013)

More info about EU funded cross border PCP projects: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/pcp/projects_en.html

More Info about national PCP initiatives in Member States: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/pcp/msinitiatives_en.html

Pilots started

Framework identified and/or Pilots in preparation

Hungary

Belgium

Netherlands

Awareness Raising Exploring possibilities

Denmark

Austria

Finland

Sweden

Poland

Working on framework

Germany

France

Luxembourg

Ireland

Cyprus

Romania

Slovenia

Slovakia

Bulgaria

Czech Republic

Estonia

Greece

Latvia Lithuania

Malta

Portugal

Spain

Norway

Switzerland

Italy

Projects in dotted-line are cross-border EC funded PCP projects that have started:

SILVER: started January 2012 (Supporting Independent Living of Elderly through Robotics)

CHARM: started September 2012 (Common Highways Agency / Rijkswaterstaat Model for traffic management of the future)

V-CON: started October 2012 (Virtual Construction / Modelling of Roads)

SMART@FIRE: started Nov 2012 (Integrated ICTs for Smart Personal Protective Equipment for Fire Fighters and First Responders)

DECIPHER: started February 2013 (new applications based on Distributed EC Individual Personal Health Records)

PRACE 3IP: started July 2012 (PRACE 3rd phase on high energy efficient high performance computing)

SILVER

UK Iceland

CHARM

V-CON

SMART@FIRE

DECIPHER

PRACE 3IP