peer editing barry gilmore february 11, 2009. peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content...

42
Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009

Upload: arleen-jenkins

Post on 17-Jan-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

“I never liked peer editing. I always felt like the person editing my paper couldn’t really help me because they didn’t know anything I didn’t already know.” -12 th grade student “The best students like peer editing the least. They feel like they’re getting ripped off. I tell them that’s too bad; it’s good for everyone else.” -English Teacher

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer EditingBarry GilmoreFebruary 11, 2009

Page 2: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973).Structured peer editing resulted in much higher writing proficiency in low-achieving 10th graders (Karegianes 1980). Peer-editing resulted in second drafts with more words and longer sentences; teacher-edited papers contained more deletions (Lagmay 2004).Peer revision training improved students’ ability to critique others’ writing (McGroarty and Zhu 2002).Teacher editing while the writer served as a peer editor resulted in greater self-editing acquisition (Jodlowski 2000).

Page 3: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

“I never liked peer editing. I always felt like the person editing my paper couldn’t really help me because they didn’t know anything I didn’t already know.”-12th grade student

“The best students like peer editing the least. They feel like they’re getting ripped off. I tell them that’s too bad; it’s good for everyone else.”

-English Teacher

Page 4: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer Editing: The Limitations(most cited by teachers—Graner 1987)

Unskilled commenting

Non-critical commenting

Loss of classroom control

Lack of student preparation

Loss of instructional time

Who benefits?

Is it worth it?

Page 5: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Is it worth it? (Instructional time)

Yes

English

Social Studies

Arts

No

Math

Science

Most AP courses

Page 6: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer Learning

Editing Collaboration

Group work

Coaching Review Discussion

Page 7: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer Learning

Peer Learning (Content Areas)

Chemistry Class:1. Some students came early and learned the lab so they could help the others the next day (space issue) 2. Students worked with partners to hypothesize and brainstorm procedures3. First pair finished with 1st procedure taught the second procedure to all others4. Partners checked written results against one another

Page 8: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing
Page 9: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing
Page 10: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

AP Statistics Class:1. Students work with partners to develop topics for an essay

2. Students complete first draft and receive teacher feedback

3. Students complete second draft and present to peers

4. Peers ask questions and make suggestions5. Students complete final draft

Peer Learning (Content Areas)

Page 11: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer Learning

Editing Collaboration

Group work

Coaching Review Discussion

Page 12: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Is it worth it? (Instructional time)

Style Information

Long term Short term

Good practice is the point

Correct answers are the point

FocusRepetition

H.O.C.

Page 13: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer Editing: The Limitations(most cited by teachers—Graner 1987)

Unskilled commenting

Non-critical commenting

Who benefits?

Page 14: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Who benefits?

Author? Editors?

Teachers?

Long termShort term

?

Self-editing

Correction Time (?)New Ideas Expansion

DraftsPaper LoadStudent Skill

Social Skill

Page 15: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Peer Editing

Classic Model

Students write

Peers edit

Students rewrite

Alternate Model

Brainstorming

Topic developmentThesis review

Group editing

Peer editing

Guided editing (checklists,

models)

Teacher follow-upReward /

Punishment

Positive / Negative Ratios

Low / high stakesJigsaw editing

Page 16: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

1.Groups – choose a topic• Safe and unsafe places• Reactions of townspeople• Characters who change their

minds• Important words• Imitation

2. List of quotations3. The Electronic Conversation

Page 17: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Allison: but, the time was not come yet; and every time that wind blew over france shook the rags of the scarecrows in vein, for the birds fine of song and feather, took no worning. book 1, ch 5Jenny: ok…what does that mean?Caitlin: the scarecrows are the aristocracyLucy: once again the birds are dirtyCaitlin: i thinkJenny: wait a seecLucy: no,no,the wind is the scary mean people and the scarccrow are the porr people fighting the revolutionAllison: yeah lucy that’s what I was sayinLucy: and rthe poor are scarred away until the revolution comesJenny: I think that there were so many times the thwe revolution could have occurred that (wind in vien) that when it actually cam the rich had no idea it was coming

Page 18: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

1.Groups – choose a topic2. List of quotations/scenes3. The Electronic Conversation4. My response5. Group Summary

Page 19: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Although the barbaric human is often mentioned, we feel that the most important thematic issue within animal imagery is how the poor people are referred to as dogs and pigs. But social class differences are also illustrated symbolically by other images, such as the description of the ragged scarecrows (symbolizing the poor), while birds symbolize the upper class.

Page 20: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

1.Groups – choose a topic2. List of quotations3. The Electronic Conversation4. My response5. Group Summary6. Formal Writing (Individual)

Page 21: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

In addition to the obvious use of imagery as a way of categorizing social groups, Dickens uses such symbolic language to foreshadow the coming revolution. In portraying the broken wine cask early in the book, he offers a general statement of “warning” for the reader that is wholly missed by the aristocracy, who, like “birds fine of song and feather,” go about their usual business heedless of the coming turmoil.

Page 22: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Do students coach and lead?

Is process rewarded?Is ownership encouraged?Are intrinsic rewards emphasized?

Classroom Culture

Are students involved in decision making?Is authentic collaboration encouraged?Is there an audience for student work?

Page 23: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Effective peer groups: assigning roles

Leader

Recorder

Researcher

Responder

Presenter

Artist

Grammar

Syntax

Punctuation

Verbs

Citations

Thesis

Rwandan govt.

U.S.

French

U.N. Admin.

U.N. Forces

RPF

Calculations

Process

Clarity

Graphs

Format

Page 24: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Practical Considerations

Pairing Students

Conferencing

Publication / Audience

Color-Coding/ Track Changes

Technology: Using a wiki

Page 25: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing
Page 26: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Practical Considerations

Pairing Students

Conferencing

Publication / Audience

Color-Coding/ Track Changes

Technology: Using a wiki

Teacher modeling

Page 27: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing
Page 28: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing
Page 29: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing
Page 30: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Names are a very important part of one’s personality. The name Sarah, for instance, comes from the Bible. This shows that names have a long tradition for many people. Tradition helps to determine the adult one becomes.

Peer Editing: Sample Assignment

Page 31: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Dear Joel,Did you know that my name comes from the Bible? Actually, I’m not sure who Sarah was, but my mom told me she learned about my name in Sunday School when she was a kid.

Sarah

Page 32: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Dear Sarah,That’s cool. Joel is a religious name, too. It means God. So I’m like God, only I don’t really think that so don’t think I’m full of myself please. You should find out more about your name. Let me know if you do.

Your friend (but not God),Joel

Page 33: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Hey Joel,I don’t think your God either.

Sarah

P.S. Hey I’m just kidding and I think Joel is a cool name.

Page 34: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Sarah.

HA HA HA.

I just asked Ms. R about you’re name and she says Sarah was Abraham’s wife and she had a baby when she was 90!!! I don’t know who Abraham was, though, but he’s in the bible too. You should write about that.

Joel

Page 35: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

That’s a good idea but I don’t want to have a baby when I’m 90 because I couldn’t pick it up or something. Babys are gross anyway. Do you want babies someday?

Sarah

Page 36: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Dear Sarah,

No way.

Joel

Page 37: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

The correct way to pronounce my name is “a’-kee-eh”. Each sylable pronounced distinctly and sharply without blending into the next sylable. Unfortunately, when people try to pronounce it “in the right way,” they actually mispronounce it by creating a whole different word, sound, and meaning: a’-ki-ya. Which means an “empty house” in the Japanese language. In my opinion, being “a key” is better than being an “empty house,” because akie is from the word aki. Which in Japanese language means autumn the best season of the year! Even though the pronunciation of autumn aki is different from the English word “a key” I am willing to be “a key”. I could lock door of an empty house. -Akie Maekawa

Page 38: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

In regards to the object I would bring to college with me, I have chosen the cork bulletin board that hangs on the wall above my bed. This object may seem to be just a bunch of simple words and pieces of paper to the casual observer, but due to a large number of years during which the bulletin board has been collecting scraps and mementos of my life, it has become a meaningful repository of memories that I treasure. There are a pictures, concert tickets, and even immature love letters, all of which are like a puzzle that together forms the pieces of my life. Knowing its with me, college will be easier to take and I won’t feel homesick, but instead I will look forward to the new tacks, nametags and bumper-stickers I can fill it with depending on my future.

Page 39: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Re-examining vision:topic, approach, voice, point of view,

direction

Revisiting organization:structure, order, argument

Editing for style:reconsidering syntax,

imagery, clarity

Proofreading:grammar

The Revision Cone

Page 40: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

It was the playbill that won the first tack in the cork board; “The Phantom of the Opera” inspired me not only to seek out the ones refused compassion from the world, but also to learn the ways of the theatre, to desire to create the next Don Juan who would bring the ghosts of people’s hearts up from the basements to the center stage. Then, rolling across the board, a time-stream of pictures: friends, family, boys, better times. The one my eyes always find amidst the multitude is of a young girl and a handsome boy, his arms wrapped around her with a smile and glowing face, the same tack pinning down a ticket to a concert, a first date, a first kiss.

Page 41: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

The simple words, the simple pieces of paper, the simple incidents that make a person; how can someone put into words the colorfulness of the mind and soul without showing the cork board, filled with not only thousands of tacks, but empty holes, from papers taken out and never replaced? Try reading between the lines of immature love letters, asking what happened at the birthday parties, concerts and movies after reading the invitations and tickets, studying the expressions of faces in the dozens of pictures, attending the various conventions commemorated by nametags, laughing at all the cheap bumper-stickers with mind-provoking sayings, or crying on the drawings from appreciative camp children. Here before me, staring me in the face at every break and eve, is all the inspiration I need to fit together the puzzle of my life: just a smaller piece of the puzzle I will find myself connected to when my new cork-board is being filled on the first day of college.

Page 42: Peer Editing Barry Gilmore February 11, 2009. Peer-editing resulted in both higher scores on content and grammar usage (Ford 1973). Structured peer editing

Barry [email protected]

www.barrygilmore.wikispaces.com