pedagogical introduction u we do multiplying interferometry. (correlator) u we do ``1-photon’’...
Post on 17-Jan-2018
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTIONWe REALLY do ``one-photon’’ interferometry: u Example: u Typical flux density at 3mm~ 1 mJy = 1.3E-7 photons / sec / m 2 / Hz. u 2 x 15-m dishes => collecting area = 230 m 2. u In 1-MHz band, power to 2 dishes = 30 photons/sec. u For clock rate of 320 MHz, sample time = 3.1 nsec. u So we record ~10 million samples before getting one photon from the sky. u Is this OK ? Can we get interference?
Pedagogical Introduction u We do multiplying interferometry. (correlator) u We do ``1-photon interferometry, not ``2-photon interferometry. u We measure phases. We need phase stability. We must phase-lock oscillators. u ``Detection occurs in the correlator. u We cannot detect individual photons. : 2 kinds. : 2 kinds. We do this. We dont do this. (One-photon interferometry) We REALLY do ``one-photon interferometry: u Example: u Typical flux density at 3mm~ 1 mJy = 1.3E-7 photons / sec / m 2 / Hz. u 2 x 15-m dishes => collecting area = 230 m 2. u In 1-MHz band, power to 2 dishes = 30 photons/sec. u For clock rate of 320 MHz, sample time = 3.1 nsec. u So we record ~10 million samples before getting one photon from the sky. u Is this OK ? Can we get interference? ``1-photon interference: A students experiment in u Geoffrey Taylor (student of J.J. Thompson). u NB: Max Plancks theory of quanta (1900). u Taylor 1909, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 15, 114 Geoffrey Taylors 1909 prototype of the Plateau de Bure interferometer. Geoffrey Taylors 1909 prototype of the Plateau de Bure interferometer. Taylors physics experiment, built at home: Left: strong, many-photon light. Right: 1-photon at a time. (no difference). ``A photon only interferes with itself. --- Dirac (1932) Dirac got this by pure thought. Taylors paper was long-forgotten. (In fact, only ``probabilty amplitudes interfere, not the photons). But what about the 2-path, 2-dectector interferometer? Suppose you send it only ``one photon at a time? Try it in the lab. Detectors One beam splitter: 2 paths, 2 detectors post-detection correlation; try one photon: get zero correlation ! u Conclusions: u Photon not a wave. u Can identify path. u No interference. u NOT WHAT WE DO. u What saves us? Detector Grangier, Roger, Aspect (1986) 1 photon2 photons Beam splitter Correlation vs. photon number Add a 2nd beam-splitter: (Mach-Zehnder) now have 2 paths, correlate at end, just like our mm interferometer. M-Z like Plateau de Bure interferometer: 2 paths, correlate at end. Single- photon input Antenna 1 path Antenna 2 path One photon input to M-Z: fringes as function of path delay. Grangier, Roger, Aspect, 1986, Europhys. Lett., 1, 173 Hanbury Browns radio interferometer of Almost right for us. BUT WE DONT DO THIS : Our ``detector is here : ( the Correlator ) Note: Cables not necessary. Hanbury-Brown used WiFi (in 1952 !!). Importance of phase-locking: Can lasers interfere? Enloe & Rodda 1965, Proc. IRE, 55, 166 Bell Labs, Holmdel, N.J. Lasers on shock- mounted concrete bloc, in a concrete vault. Can two lasers interfere? Yes, if you phase-lock. This is Youngs 2-slit experiment, without the slits !! ``One photon comes from two lasers !! Now Repeat Taylors experiment of Reduce flux to 1-photon. Just like PdB mm interferometer: 2 phased paths, 1-photon-at-a-time. The interference pattern will still build up. ( ``A photon only interferes with itself. ) Another way to think of it. Loudon, Quantum Theory of Light, in agreement with W.E. Lambs ``Anti-photon critique. Another way to think of it. Loudon, Quantum Theory of Light, in agreement with W.E. Lambs ``Anti-photon critique. 1. A ``photon is not a globule of light, traveling like a bullet through the interferometer. 2. Regard the interferometer as a tuned, (phase- locked) resonant cavity, that allows traveling- wave modes. 3. A 1- photon excitation of a mode is distrubuted over the entire interferometer, including the two internal paths.. Yet another way to think of it: u Think of the two antennas (2 slits) as a filter. u The filter takes one QM state and gives you another (like an ``operator on a Hilbert space). u The filter convolves 2 delta-functions of position with the original state to give you a different state on the other side of the 2 slits. u In contrast, you give the detector a QM state, and it gives you back a number. u Filters and detectors are very different things. The ``quantum limit for receivers is irrelevant for interferometry. u The receiver ``quantum limit means k T R = h. u So the receiver steadily emits 1 photon in (1/ ) sec. u In a 1-MHz band, a receiver at the ``quantum limit emits 10 6 photons /sec. u But in a 1-Mhz band, 2 x 15m antennas looking at a 1-mJy source at 3mm collect only 30 photons/sec. u So there is no way we can recognize that an individual photon comes from the sky. Question in an interferometry course: Suppose we could detect an individual photon (e.g. on a hard disk at one antenna of the Plateau de Bure interferometer). Then how can we get interference? The usual way to think of it. The usual diagram of radio interferometry is a space-space diagram. Its a snapshot at an instant in time. Radio interferometry An interferometers measures coherence in the electric field between pairs of points (baselines). wavefront Correlator B Direction to source Bsin Incoming signals are corrected for geometric delay and multiplied to yield a complex visibility, V = |V|e i , which has an amplitude and phase. cc T1 T2 (courtesy Ray Norris) Usual diagram of Another way: a space-time diagram: 1 Photon in from sky to interferometer which is at rest in space, moving only in time (vertical straight line). Change the Lorentz frame: One photon in, two photons out. One is an induced photon, One is spontaneous emission. Which is which? No way to tell. Hence we cannot identify the path. Hence we can do inteferometry. Basic Concepts An interferometer measures coherence in the electric field between pairs of points (baselines). Direction to source Because of the geometric path difference c , the incoming wavefront arrives at each antenna at a different phase. wavefront Correlator B Bsin cc T1 T2 (courtesy Ray Norris) Aperture Synthesis As the source moves across the sky (due to Earths rotation), the baseline vector traces part of an ellipse in the (u,v) plane. B sin = (u 2 + v 2 ) 1/2 v (k ) u (k ) T1 T2 Actually we obtain data at both (u,v) and (-u,-v) simultaneously, since the two antennas are interchangeable. Ellipse completed in 12h, not 24! B Bsin T1 T2