turkey - 3rp regional refugee & resilience plan … turkey regional refugee & resilience...

TURKEY

CONTENTSINTRODUCTION & CONTEXT

NEEDS, VULNERABILITIES &TARGETING

STRATEGIC VISION & RESPONSEPLAN

PARTNERSHIPS & COORDINATION

ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK

SECTOR RESPONSES:

- PROTECTION- FOOD SECURITY- EDUCATION- HEALTH- BASIC NEEDS- LIVELIHOODS

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

3 - 6

7 - 8

8 - 9

10

11

12 - 88

12 - 2829 - 4142 - 5253 - 6869 - 7980 - 88

89

2

TUR

KEY

3

TURKEY Regional Refugee & Resilience Plan 2016 - 2017

As the Syrian refugee crisis enters into its fifth year, the protracted situation is having a growing impact beyond its neighbouring countries. Instability in the region is expected to persist, and consequent displacement, inside Syria and across the border into Turkey, will continue. Given the fluid situation on the ground, it is uncertain what the scale of refugee flows from Syria or Iraq in 2016 will be.

Turkey now hosts the largest number of refugees in the world, including more than two million Syrian refugees, out of which more than half are children. Amidst all the challenges facing Turkey in receiving this large number of displaced people, Turkey has established a strong asylum framework through the Law on Foreigners and International Protection and the Temporary Protection Regulation, not only attempting to address the immediate humanitarian needs of refugees, but also envisioning to building up the resilience of the displaced population by offering health care and education, and with plans for enabling Syrians to gain access to the labour market. The access to the labour market is still pending the announcement of the secondary regulation which will determine the principles and procedures for Syrian’s access to employment.

However, inconsistent interpretations and practices on rights and service provisions have been observed across 3RP sectors and locations in the country following the announcement of the Temporary Protection Regulation in October 2014. In addition, an increased number of new actors in the Syrian response, including government and non-governmental partners, underline the continued need for integrated strategies for advocacy and capacity building.

INTRODUCTION &CONTEXT

©UNHCR / Ayberk Yurtsever

4

More than one year after its inauguration, the Directorate General of Migration Management (DGMM) is operational in all provinces. DGMM launched its registration database, GOC-NET, on 18 May 2015, a platform for streamlining all refugees and asylum-seekers into a national database system. 3RP partners provided extensive financial and technical support to strengthen the registration capacity of the Government. As of 1 October 2015, 2,072,290 Syrian refugees were registered in Turkey. In addition, there are an increasing number of Syrians (and other nationalities) moving through Turkey to reach Europe.

The 3RP anticipates a total of 2.5 million Syrians registered in Turkey by the end of 2015, and a total of 2.75 million by end 2016. It is estimated that 300,000 will be hosted in the official refugee camps managed by the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) and 2.45 million will live within host communities.

The overall response to the Syrian crisis in Turkey demonstrated strong national ownership, with the Government of Turkey playing a firm leading role in the

©UNFPA/ Nergis Guler

provision of protection and assistances. AFAD continues to provide services in 23 refugee camps hosting Syrians in the southeast of Turkey. Turkey has assured that it will maintain an “open door policy”, although tightened measures are implemented for security reasons. In as much as resources permit, 3RP partners

will continue supporting Turkey in its efforts to provide humanitarian assistance to the newly arrived and vulnerable families, support efforts to increase the resilience of the refugee community, as well as to promote social cohesion. The combined interventions through all sectors to improve resilience and counter destitution

©UNHCR / Emrah Gurel

5


may have some positive impact on the onward movements to Europe.Building on the results of the 2015 implementation, 3RP sectors envisage the below highlights in 2016:

The Protection sector will continue to support Turkey for the adoption of a protection-sensitive registration system to ensure those at risk are systematically identified and their needs addressed with specialized interventions and services. In close cooperation with DGMM, AFAD, the Ministry of Family and Social Policies and other relevant line ministries, further investment in community-based protection initiatives through engagement of and consultation with women, girls, boys and men for prevention, identification, and response to specific needs will be prioritized. The sector will continue to support national protection systems, civil society and communities in order to ensure persons with special needs have access to specialized protection services and psychosocial support, including for children and women at risk. While 3RP

partners continuing to provide technical support to the government partners, capacity building of national/local NGOs is underlined as a priority to ensure that national actors are capable of taking over service provisions in the longer-term. In addition, more public awareness initiatives will be carried out to inform the refugee community on all protection related issues.

The Food Security sector plans to continue the provision of food assistance through various transfer modalities to the most vulnerable Syrians residing in Turkey; and to support national safety nets and food security strategy development through a coordinated, large-scale and harmonised response. In camps, in cooperation with AFAD, e-vouchers enable the purchases of sufficient nutritious food to meet families’ needs. Whilst in off-camp settings, food security and protection of livelihoods remain a top priority and an urgent need for Syrian refugee households. 3RP partners plan to continue working with national and local

authorities to deliver targeted assistance to those most in need. The Education sector, in close collaboration with the Ministry of National Education, aims to increase access to formal schooling to the more than 400,000 children who remain out of school. Existing initiatives to enhance support teacher incentives and training, increase provision through Temporary Learning Centres, pre-schooling and access to Turkish State schools, and improve the data and monitoring of refugee children in education will be expanded in 2016. Greater attention will be paid to providing educational opportunities for adolescents and youth by increasing the number of higher education scholarships, Turkish language, non-formal education and skills training opportunities. The huge demand for higher education is evidenced by the almost 6,000 DAFI scholarship applications for less than 100 places.

The Health sector will continue to support the Ministry of Health in strengthening the health service delivery for Syrian refugees

1 The Albert Einstein German Academic Refugee Initiative (DAFI), in partnership with the UN, grants scholarships to refugees at universities, colleges and polytechnics in their host countries.

©UNHCR / Nayana Bose

6

Investing in the future –No Lost Generation: basic, secondary and higher education for refugees in Turkey

When exploring ways to strengthen the resilience of the refugee population, the potential of one particular stakeholder cannot be underestimated – the refugees themselves. Heeding the call to avoid a lost generation of Syrians, Turkey is again setting an example by prioritizing access to certified, quality education for Syrian children and youth of all ages. Under the leadership of the Ministry of National Education 3RP partners and the Government of Turkey managed to enroll 215,000 Syrian children in primary and secondary school by the end of the 2014-2015 school year, an over 100% increase from the previous academic year.

In addition, recognizing the importance of higher education to develop the skills and capacity of the refugee community, the Government of Turkey has waived the tuition fees for all Syrian refugee students attending state universities and is offering 1,000 university scholarships in Turkish universities every year in a consecutive five-year span. Higher education access develops the skills and capacity of the refugee community, improves individuals’ earning capacity, builds human and social capital and has been linked with faster national economic growth. Access to post-secondary education also stimulates enrolment in primary and secondary education and encourages more students to complete the full secondary education cycle. Successful refugee students also serve as role models for their communities. 3RP partners are actively reinforcing this initiative by supporting the Turkish language courses for refugee students and coupling the government scholarship programme with additional spaces.

In 2016 Turkey will actively contribute to all three pillars of the No Lost Generation initiative with an ambitious scale-up of access to certified quality education, as well as expanding the protective environment for children and youth and ensuring that adolescents and youth are better able to contribute to resilience and social cohesion in their communities.

and host populations at different levels of care. The role of the family and community health centres as primary care providers for Syrian refugees will be strengthened to respond, together with secondary and tertiary care, to the increasing needs of the Syrian and host communities. Health sector partners will support the Ministry of Health through establishing more temporary health centres to integrate Syrian health professionals into the Turkish health system, which will also address the language barrier for Syrian patients and decongest Turkish health facilities.

In the Basic Needs and Essential Services sector, partners will support the provision of basic needs (shelter, non-food items and camp infrastructures) to the refugee camps in close coordination with AFAD and DGMM. For refugees in the community, basic needs support is provided through non-food items distributions and cash-based interventions in close coordination with the authorities, 3RP participating agencies and partners. Given the size of the population living in urban, peri-urban and rural areas and the decreasing resources of its members, particular focus will be placed on this group. Basic needs assistance varies from emergency assistance, regular assistance and seasonal assistance. The resilience component of the basic needs looks at supporting the hosting communities.

The Livelihoods sector considers the legal framework in Turkey as the most crucial element in regard to accessing the labour market. Awarding the right to work will enable Syrian refugees to gain formal and legal employment and earn incomes, while contributing to the local host environment and will be a determining factor in shaping the Livelihoods sector response. In the current context, livelihoods interventions are focused on training programs to equip the Syrian population with skills for employment, including adolescents, youth and adults, as well as supporting self-employment activities. Interventions based on solid market assessments are essential for resource optimization and quick results. Entrepreneurship - the key for economic

development – also plays a crucial role in the Turkey context. With no political solution to the Syrian crisis in sight, and as the displaced population is becoming progressively destitute, it is of crucial importance that the international community steps up its support to the refugee host countries to ensure the protection space is maintained, immediate life-saving needs are met, and to stabilize population movements. In addition, the protracted nature of the crises underlines the urgency of a medium to longer-term strategy exploring ways to build up the resilience of both the refugee population and the host communities.

Although 2015 has seen a larger amount of contributions to Turkey in comparison to previous years, the level of support is still far from sufficient. 3RP partners are calling for increased international responsibility sharing to support Turkey, in terms of technical advice, financial contributions and resettlement places.The response to the Syria situation within the 3RP is coordinated by UNHCR (Refugee Response) and UNDP (Resilience Response) with the participation of FAO, ILO, IOM, UNDP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIDO, WFP, WHO and international and national NGOs.

7


NEEDS, VULNERABILITIES AND TARGETING

A. Population Group Age Groups

Refugee Resilience

Population In Need

Target Population2 Population In Need

Target Population

Syrian Refugees in Camps

Men 68,400 68,400 68,400 68,400

Women 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000

Boys 84,000 84,000 84,000 84,000

Girls 78,600 78,600 78,600 78,600

Sub Total 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000

Syrian Refugees in the Community

Men 558,600 558,600 558,600 558,600

Women 563,500 563,500 563,500 563,500

Boys 686,000 686,000 686,000 686,000

Girls 641,900 641,900 641,900 641,900

Sub Total 2,450,000 2,450,000 2,450,000 2,450,000

Members of Affected Communities

Men - - - -

Women - - - -

Boys - - - -

Girls - - - -

Sub Total 8,200,000 400,000 8,200,000 565,078

Grand Total 10,950,000 3,150,000 10,950,000 3,315,078

2 The columns for target population are only for direct beneficiaries where accurate numbers are available. If you have estimates of indirect beneficiaries for resilience building (i.e.: of systems-strengthening, institutional capacity-building, etc.), please include this in the narrative section below rather than in the table.

8

Since DGMM became operational in April 2014, it has streamlined the registration of all foreigners in Turkey, including refugees and asylum-seekers. However, detailed information on registration and vulnerability is not available to the UN and aid agencies. In the meantime, surveys and assessments are coordinated by the authorities, and a limited number of assessments were carried out in 2015. Given the vast majority of the Syrians are living out of the camps and dispersed across the entire country, outreach and identification of vulnerable refugees in the community remains a key challenge across all sectors in the design, implementation and evaluation of 3RP.

In the absence of a comprehensive needs assessment, an AFAD survey Syrian Women in Turkey of 1,500 camp households and 1,200 non-camp households in late 2014 gives a snapshot of the refugee profile. The findings

showed that around 97 percent of female Syrians living outside of the camps have not been able to earn an income in the month prior to the survey, and 78 percent of the respondents indicated not having a sufficient amount of food for the next seven days, nor having money to purchase it. More than half of the respondents indicated that they or their family members require psychological support.

As refugees in camps are provided with shelter, food rations, non-food items and basic services, outreach and identification of vulnerable families living in host communities is a priority gap. The existing targeting process is conducted through various outreach centres established by aid agencies as well as through outreach activities. 3RP partners are working together to improve the vulnerability assessment framework as well as harmonize the vulnerability

1. Families and communities are strengthened, engaged, and empowered in order to contribute to their own protection solutions, while the most vulnerable women, girls, boys and men are identified and their needs addressed through appropriate services and interventions.

2. The most vulnerable Syrians continue to receive food assistance through various transfer modalities, and national safety nets are supported with the development of food security strategy to ensure a coordinated, large-scale and harmonised response.

3. Refugee children, youth and adults have increased access to an enhanced quality of educational services.

4. Syrian refugees and host communities have improved access

STRATEGIC VISION & RESPONSE PLANS

to health services that respond to the needs and expectations of the served population.

5. Syrians refugees residing in refugee camps and the most vulnerable Syrians in the community are supported to live in adequate shelters in satisfactory conditions of sanitation and hygiene, and their basic needs are met.

6. Both Syrians and host communities have improved livelihoods and living conditions, including better and decent work conditions.

As Turkey leads the response and has already developed a rights based national asylum framework, the overall strategy of the 3RP responses is to strengthen national capacity to ensure sustainability and national ownership of interventions. In the meantime, as significant gaps

still exist between the national capacity and the needs of accommodating over two million refugees, continued advocacy, fund raising and capacity building is needed to ensure consistent implementation of the national asylum laws and regulations. This strategy will allow an eventual phase out of 3RP partners when the national institutions are ready to take over the service provision to the entire refugee population, most particularly to the populations living in urban, peri-urban and rural areas.While Turkey maintains high standards in the assistance and service provision in the refugee camps, such standards are not sustainable without the support from the international community. 3RP partners will continue to assist the government to provide food rations and non-food items to camp residents, as well as support camp education, protection, health care services, and camp infrastructure in 2016.

criteria.

The geographic targeting approach is also used in the absence of access to registration data and to concentrate limited resources to localities hosting high numbers of refugees, such as southeast provinces and Istanbul. However it should be underlined that there are an increasing number of Syrian refugees living outside of these areas, who have minimal access to services and assistances and who will need increasing support.

With a significant investment in supporting the national capacity in responding to the Syrian crisis, a large portion of the 3RP interventions will benefit the entire refugee population and local communities through technical knowledge sharing with government partners as well as supply of equipment and infrastructure support to national institutions

9


Outreach to, and vulnerability identification of, Syrians in the community remains a challenge for all sectors. While 3RP partners actively advocate for integrating refugees into the national system, substantial inputs need to be invested to support the government’s efforts to strengthen the capacity of education, health, employment, social welfare and justice systems to support the large number of refugees.

In the meantime, most vulnerable refugees in the community will be supported through various interventions, including the expansion of outreach centres (multi-service centres, community centres, women centres, child friendly spaces) in southeast provinces and other locations hosting large numbers of refugees. While in-kind food and non-food items support

will continue to be provided, in particular for winterization, cash-based interventions will be scaled up in several sectors to allow refugees to respond to their own needs and make financial injections to the local economy. The identification of beneficiaries is planned to be carried out in coordination with national and local institutions and social structures.

As the Syrian crisis protracts further, both the Government of Turkey and aid agencies are focusing more on a medium to longer-term strategy. Resilience strategies, particularly relating to education, livelihoods and social cohesion will become fundamental components of a longer-term plan. 3RP partners will seek active participation of development partners and the private sector in this regard. Turkey should be recognized for

©UNFPA

its remarkable generosity in awarding full-span education to Syrian refugees, from primary to higher education, and plans to open the labour market. 3RP partners will firmly support Turkey in moving towards the longer-term planning through advocating for strengthened international support, mobilizing resources and providing expertise in these areas.

The Refugee Response attempts to address the immediate needs in receiving over two million refugees, and the Resilience Response plans to address the medium and long-term needs given that there is no political solution to the Syrian crisis in sight. 3RP partners appreciate the support that the Government of Turkey extends to 3RP interventions and to the work of other aid agencies in both responses.

10

PARTNERSHIPS & COORDINATIONThe Government of Turkey is the main responder to the emergency and provides protection of refugees and asylum-seekers in the country. Under the leadership of the central government, a field government coordination structure is established at the governorate level, with the provincial governors taking the lead in field coordination, with the field presence of AFAD, DGMM and other concerned ministries. 3RP partners are providing inputs to these government coordination meetings.AFAD remains the sole authority in determining the terms of camp management and the creation of new camps. 3RP partners support AFAD through the provision of camp facilities and non-food items to camp residents. The UN coordination structure features a dual leadership with UNHCR leading the Refugee Response and UNDP leading the Resilience Response in order to better

bridge humanitarian assistance with development interventions. This platform allows for increased engagement with development actors (both donors and partners), and was welcomed by the Government of Turkey, which is seeking enhanced international solidarity given the magnitude of the presence of refugees and asylum-seekers from Syria and other countries.In the meantime, NGOs are playing an increasingly active role in the response. As of October 2015, 139 international NGOs were accredited in Turkey – nearly half of them were accredited after the beginning of the Syria crisis, and many are responding to it. They reinforce local NGOs on various fronts to strengthen the protection and service delivery to non-camp refugees and asylum-seekers. Many of them are already United Nations’ partners and implementing 3RP activities.Under the 3RP framework, inter-sector

coordination mechanisms and sector working groups/ sub-working groups were created at both Ankara and field levels. These coordination mechanisms interact not only among the 3RP partners, but involve government partners to ensure a common understanding of needs and priorities, as well as a harmonized approach in delivery of services and assistance wherever possible, such as the provision of multi-purpose cash-based interventions.With the much anticipated opening of the labour market and as both refugee and host communities are struggling with limited resources, an increasing number of private sector actors are seeking to join the 3RP partners in responding to the Syrian crisis and to help mitigate the impact on the host communities. 3RP partners welcome this new development and are actively exploring ways to engage with the private sector.

©UNHCR/ E.Drofman

11


ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK In the absence of access to population registration information and varying levels of permission to conduct assessments and surveys, the challenge remains for 3RP partners to establish a concrete accountability framework to monitor and evaluate the impact of the interventions. In addition, proper mapping of donor funding channelled to services and assistance is not yet in place. However, the Syrian Task Force Group and sector working groups have already established coordination mechanisms in Ankara and in the field, and are monitoring 3RP activities to the extent possible to strengthen the accountability of the 3RP implementation. Meanwhile, refugee communities are involved in the planning, implementation and evaluation processes through focus group discussions, refugee representatives, and increasingly refugee volunteers.

In order to enhance accountability within the existing context, the 3RP planning process endeavours to reach out to all stakeholders, including government and NGO partners as well as refugee communities, to ensure participatory and realistic planning. Inter-agency coordination meetings and sector working groups are platforms for agencies to exchange information on planning and implementation to avoid overlapping. The application of new technologies is also being explored. Meanwhile, 3RP partners will continue advocating with the Government of Turkey for increased flexibility and cooperation in organizing surveys and assessments which could improve the 3RP accountability framework.

©WFP/BernaCetin

12

PROTECTIONSECTOR RESPONSE Lead Agencies UNHCR

Partners IOM, UNFPA, UNICEF, UNDP and partners

Objectives

1. Refugees fleeing Syria can access the territory and receive effective protection under a legal framework

2. Families and communities are strengthened, engaged, and empowered in order to contribute to their own protection solutions, while the most vulnerable women, girls, boys and men are identified and their needs addressed through appropriate services and interventions

3. The risks and consequences of SGBV experienced by women, girls, boys, and men are mitigated and the access to quality services is improved

4. Girls and boys affected by the Syria crisis have increased and more equitable access to quality child protection interventions

GENDER MARKER 2a

REFUGEE FINANCIAL RE-QUIREMENT 2016

US$ 69,426,500

RESILIENCE FINANCIAL RE-QUIREMENT 2016

US$ 41,464,500

3RP TOTAL FINANCIAL RE-QUIREMENT 2016

US$ 110,891,000

TOTAL INDICATIVE REQUIREMENTS 2016

US$ 110,891,000

CONTACT INFORMATION Refugee Component: Luca CurciResilience Component:

713

37,168

13,056

873,500

23,888

131,448

13

11

2,092,790

4,539

4,702

2,083

2,633

3

8,800

189,400

42,000

500,000

126,000

106,000

17

12

2,500,000

10,000

6,000

650

725

8

%0 %20 %40 %60 %80 %100

# of most vulnerable children (cases) supported through governmentservices

# of children who receive child protection services

# of applicants who receive PSS (individual and in groups) (SGBV)

# of persons provided with SGBV brochures

# persons reached through information campaigns or cross-culturalactivity events

# of Persons benefitting from services in the community centers

# of partners empowered to support community based protection andpsycho-social support interventions

# of Community Centers established or supported

# of Syrians registered by the Government of Turkey

# of Syrians submitted for resettlement by UNHCR

# of youth attending specialized training courses

# of persons trained on access to territory an international protection

# of persons trained on strengthening SGBV response

# of partners supported with specialized activities to promote socialengagement and cohesion of youth

Total Assisted Planned Response, by end 2015 End Year Target

SECTOR ACHIEVEMENTS (SEPTEMPER 2015)

13


PROTECTION

CURRENT SITUATION

Turkey applies strict controls on admission of refugees while maintaining an open door policy for those fleeing immediate harm to their lives. In June 2015, fighting between various armed groups in Syria resulted in an influx of nearly 25,000 refugees to Sanliurfa, Turkey. The Government of Turkey (GoT) coordinates the refugee response and is responsible for the registration, ensuring Syrian refugees have access to services. As of 1 November 2015, 2,181,293 Syrian refugees, of whom over 1.2 million children, were biometrically registered by the GoT. However, the level of information collected varies substantially throughout the country and there is no reliable estimate of the number of unregistered Syrian refugees, nor of refugees who were registered by the GoT but are no longer in the country.With a continuously growing refugee population, government services have become overwhelmed and resources are stretched. Increased destitution

among refugees living in communities is resulting in the engagement in negative coping mechanisms, such as child labour and child marriages, while aggravating tensions with impacted communities. The difficult conditions are inevitably contributing to irregular onward movements of refugees out of Turkey. In addition an increasing number of Syrians are using Turkey as a transit country in order to reach Western Europe.

During 2015, 3RP partners have continued trainings for governmental counterparts and partner staff on international refugee protection, SGBV prevention and response, child protection, working with vulnerable people, and humanitarian work ethics. Expert assistance and best practices were shared to tackle protection gaps and challenges. Advocacy was carried out regarding the implementation of Turkish law and procedures. In 2015, Working Groups that include representatives of ministries, were established on SGBV and Mental Health

and Psychosocial Support Services. The establishment of a Working Group on Child Protection is under discussion.

3RP partners continued to support the expansion of outreach mechanisms in order to strengthen community mobilization and improve the provision of assistance and services to refugees. In 2015 3RP partners facilitated the establishment and operation of over 40 outreach centres, including community centres, child friendly spaces (CFS) and safe spaces for women. Refugees with urgent protection needs, including children and women at risk, were identified and referred to national protection mechanisms and UN Agencies. 3RP partners supported the creation and empowerment of refugee committees in all camps, including committees of women, youth, and the elderly. Moreover, with the support of 3RP partners the first urban refugee committee has been established in southeast Turkey.

©UNICEF / YURTSEVER

14

NEEDS, VULNERABILITIES AND TARGETS

Population Group Age Groups

Refugee Component Resilience Component

Population In Need

Target PopulationPopulation In

NeedTarget Population


Men 68,400 68,400 68,400 479

Women 69,000 69,000 69,000 483

Boys 84,000 84,000 84,000 588

Girls 78,600 78,600 78,600 550

Sub Total 300,000 300,000 300,000 2,100


Men 558,600 530,670 558,600 9,745

Women 563,500 535,325 563,500 9,830

Boys 686,000 651,700 686,000 11,967

Girls 641,900 609,805 641,900 11,198

Sub Total 2,450,000 2,327,500 2,450,000 42,740

Members of Impact-ed Communities

Sub Total 8,216,534 1,095 8,216,534 2,100

Grand Total 10,966,534 2,628,595 10,966,534 46,940

(1) Non-Syrian refugees and Asylum-seekers in Turkey

15


PROTECTION

RESPONSE STRATEGY

For a comprehensive response strategy and improved identification of persons with special needs, a country wide, systematic and protection-sensitive registration system needs to be put in place, which captures vulnerabilities disaggregated by age and gender and identifies protection needs. Concerted efforts to strengthen access to information through outreach mechanisms remains a necessity with particular focus on the strengthening of community networks and participation. Birth registration also remains a challenge due to the lack of awareness among refugees and service providers on national procedures.

SGBV incidents continue to be underreported due to cultural barriers, fear of stigmatization, rejection by family and the community. Despite a robust national legal framework regulating the protection of women, girls, boys and men, challenges remain in terms of the prevention and early identification of SGBV survivors. Lack of awareness of

existing legislation, referral and response mechanisms, lack of psychosocial support, as well as language barriers all remain obstacles for survivors to access services and benefit from appropriate responses. Coordination between relevant service providers, including health and social assistance, and with other sectors will be strengthened. In addition to the already established women’s cultural centres and safe spaces for girls, further safe spaces for SGBV survivors and those at risk need to be established.

More than half of the Syrian refugees are children. Continued access to national child protection services for unaccompanied and other children-at-risk, including child survivors of violence and abuse, is critical. Continued engagement of 3RP partners in dialogue with relevant authorities, providing technical assistance for the implementation of a quality system of care and assistance in line with the Turkish law is required. Child marriage and child labour remain areas of serious

concern. Based on GoT figures, nearly 15% of refugee girls between 15 and 17 are married. There is an urgent need to provide continued support to the national authorities and local (NGO) partners on the identification of children/ youth at risk and the strengthening of prevention and response mechanisms. The lack of a national Best Interest Determination (BID) mechanism remains an obstacle to identifying the most appropriate interventions for unaccompanied and separated children. Increasing synergies and collaboration with other sectors such as education, basic needs and livelihoods will be crucial to address issues such as child labour and early marriage.

As many refugees need psychosocial support, 3RP partners are enhancing existing mechanisms for the identification of refugees in need, and expanding psychosocial support through national institutions.

The strategy seeks to empower communities, local NGOs, other partners and national institutions to develop their capacities and resilience to become capable to respond to the immediate and longer term needs. The promotion of self-reliance is a priority in 2016, and the 3RP partners will continue to promote the development of skills, employability, and access to the labour market, in close cooperation with the authorities and the private sector. This will counter destitution and negative coping mechanisms and promote resilience and social stabilisation. The involvement of local communities, authorities and civil society will be vital to improve peaceful coexistence.

The continuing support to national institutions and NGOs has a strong resilience component and aims to ensure that sufficient resources and the institutional mechanisms are available to facilitate the effective identification of and response to vulnerable refugees

and strengthen social cohesion and community stability. The Government continues to receive technical and material support for a comprehensive and protection-sensitive registration system that will enable it to verify initial registration and to identify refugees with special needs disaggregated by age and gender and facilitate its planning and response to those identified with needs.

As refugees are scattered throughout the country, community based protection needs to be strengthened and communities will be increasingly engaged in protection responses. In the impacted communities, 3RP partners will facilitate the creation of more outreach centers, strengthen protection networks and support community empowerment. This will enable both host and refugee communities to utilize the resources available to address their needs. Community self-management, representation and leadership in and

out of camps will be strengthened through support to diverse refugee committees. Identified community assets will be utilized to provide and facilitate preventative as well as responsive protection activities relating to SGBV, child protection, persons with special needs etc. The Syrian refugee population will continue to benefit from the strategic use of resettlement as a protection tool.

The empowerment of refugee communities will be encouraged through their participation in needs assessments and identification of solutions adapted to their age, gender and diversity, while refugee outreach volunteers will be increasingly engaged and supported. Specific activities including non-formal educational initiatives, peer-to-peer support for youth and awareness on social cohesion and peace-building will be prioritised.

Relevant authorities and (local) NGO partners will be increasingly supported

16

to carry out public awareness initiatives, through social media and community mobilization. Information will be provided to refugees on protection issues such as child marriage, the Turkish legal framework, their duties, rights and how they can access services.

Training and technical advice to national service providers will support the identification of SGBV survivors, including victims of trafficking, and devise responses in accordance with the legal framework. To support their efforts, national institutions, (local) NGOs and partners will be further capacitated to prevent and respond to SGBV and to ensure the presence of community based initiatives.In line with the No Lost Generation

initiative, 3RP partners will facilitate an increased and more equitable access for boys and girls to quality child protection interventions, by supporting relevant partners to identify and provide responses to vulnerable children, and to refer them to state institutions and service providers. Community centres will be strengthened with the presence of specialists who will support a variety of projects and activities in support of child protection. The Protection sector will support the authorities to reinforce child protection responses for all refugee children, among others through the establishment of a national Best Interest Determination mechanism for unaccompanied children and the implementation of family tracing and reunification. Support will be provided to Turkey to expand

and strengthen care arrangements for children. Capacity-building activities will be carried out for authorities, (national) NGOs and other partners to agree on standards for timely identification and referrals of child protection cases to the responsible national institutions. The promotion of consistent implementation of birth registration regulation will be a key priority in 2016. Increasing synergies and collaboration with other sectors will be a priority to provide alternatives to child labour and child marriage.

3RP partners will engage with all Government interlocutors to strengthen and facilitate access to justice, remedies, and legal assistance under national law for all refugees, in particular women and children at risk.

©UNICEF/ YURTSEVER

17


PROTECTION

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ET -

ED

LOC

ATI

ON

PA

RTN

ER

S

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

ATI

ON

UN

IT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

O

F IM

-P

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

-N

ITIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 1

.1: A

cces

s to

te

rrito

ry, j

ustic

e an

d in

-te

rnat

iona

l pro

tect

ion

is

impr

oved

for a

ll Sy

rian

natio

nals

and

sta

tele

ss

pers

ons

from

Syr

ia

# of

indi

vidu

als

train

ed o

n ac

-ce

ss to

terri

tory

an

d in

tern

atio

nal

prot

ectio

n in

clud

ing

acce

ss

to ju

stic

e

Trai

ning

act

ivity

st

atis

tics

on

num

ber o

f sta

ff tra

ined

by

rele

-va

nt a

genc

ies/

partn

ers

# of

indi

-vi

dual

s-

-1,

095

-1,

095

Thro

ugho

ut

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R,

AFAD

, Lin

e M

inis

tries

, Lo

cal

auth

oriti

es,

Lega

l Ser

-vi

ce S

taff

incl

udin

g Ba

r Ass

o -ci

atio

ns,

UN

ICEF

(for

le

gal s

er-

vice

sta

ff)

and

othe

r re

leva

nt

Partn

ers

2,75

0,00

020

0,00

05

54

# of

bro

chur

es

mad

e av

aila

ble

to re

fuge

es o

n ci

vil d

ocum

en-

tatio

n

Agen

cy d

ata

on

info

rmat

ion

tool

s de

velo

ped

and

mad

e av

aila

ble

to re

fuge

es o

n do

cum

enta

tion

(i.e.

mar

riage

, bi

rth a

nd d

eath

)

# o

f in

form

a -tio

n to

ols

deve

l-op

ed

--

--

2

Out

put 1

.3: P

rote

ctio

n se

nsiti

ve (g

ende

r dis

-ag

greg

ated

) reg

istra

-tio

n an

d ve

rific

atio

n is

in

pla

ce fo

r all

refu

gees

# of

Syr

ian

indi

vidu

als

regi

ster

ed b

y th

e G

over

nmen

t of

Turk

ey

Gov

ernm

ent r

eg-

istra

tion

data

# of

indi

-vi

dual

s30

0,00

02,

450,

000

--

2,75

0,00

0Th

roug

hout

Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

AFAD

, D

GM

M,

Loca

l au

thor

ities

22,0

50,0

002,

250,

000

55

3

Out

put 1

.5: R

eset

tle-

men

t and

pro

tect

ion

solu

tions

iden

tifie

d

# of

Syr

ian

indi

vidu

als

subm

itted

for

rese

ttlem

ent b

y U

NH

CR

UN

HC

R Re

settl

emen

t un

it su

bmis

sion

st

atis

tics

# of

indi

-vi

dual

s50

09,

500

--

10,0

00Th

roug

hout

Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

DG

MM

, Lo

cal

auth

oriti

es

4,50

0,00

01,

700,

000

25

4

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

29,

300,

000

4,1

50,0

00

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

Ref

ugee

s fle

eing

Syr

ia c

ontin

ue to

be

able

to a

cces

s th

e te

rrito

ry a

nd re

ceiv

e ef

fect

ive

prot

ectio

n un

der a

lega

l fra

mew

ork

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f ref

ugee

s re

gist

ered

with

th

e au

thor

ities

(age

and

gen

der

disa

ggre

gate

d w

here

pos

sibl

e)

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

90%

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 95

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Gov

ernm

ent

regi

stra

tion

data

55

4

SE

CT

OR

RE

SP

ON

SE

OV

ER

VIE

W T

AB

LE

18

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 1

.2: L

egal

ai

d m

echa

nism

s ar

e st

reng

then

ed

thro

ugh

capa

c-ity

-bui

ldin

g an

d aw

aren

ess-

rais

ing

to

ensu

re a

vaila

bilit

y to

re

fuge

es

# of

trai

ning

, w

orks

hop,

ev

ents

co

nduc

ted

aim

ing

to

stre

ngth

en

lega

l aid

m

echa

nism

s

Trai

ning

, w

orks

hop,

ev

ents

act

iv-

ity s

tatis

tics

on le

gal a

id

mec

hani

sms

from

rele

vant

ag

enci

es

# of

tra

inin

g ac

tivi -

ties

21Th

roug

hout

Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, G

over

nmen

t au

thor

ities

, Ba

r Ass

o -ci

atio

ns,

Judi

ciar

y

480,

000

120,

000

55

3

Out

put 1

.4: A

utho

r-iti

es a

re s

uppo

rted

to id

entif

y an

d re

fer

case

s in

nee

d of

a

rese

ttlem

ent s

olut

ion

# of

Syr

ian

indi

vidu

als

refe

rred

by th

e au

-th

oriti

es fo

r re

settl

emen

t so

lutio

ns

(age

and

ge

nder

di

sagg

re-

gate

d w

here

po

ssib

le)

Gov

ernm

ent

refe

rrals

to

UN

HC

R

# of

in

divi

d-ua

ls1,

000

19,0

0020

,000

Thro

ugho

ut

Turk

eyU

NH

CR,

D

GM

M1,

425,

000

100,

000

55

4

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

1,9

05,0

00

220

,000

19


PROTECTION

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

Fam

ilies

and

com

mun

ities

are

stre

ngth

ened

, eng

aged

, and

em

pow

ered

in o

rder

to c

ontri

bute

to th

eir o

wn

prot

ectio

n so

lutio

ns, w

hile

vul

nera

ble

wom

en, g

irls,

boy

s an

d m

en a

re id

entifi

ed a

nd th

eir n

eeds

add

ress

ed th

roug

h ap

prop

riate

pr

otec

tion

and

assi

stan

ce c

hann

els

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f ref

ugee

s su

ppor

ted

thro

ugh

com

mun

ity-b

ased

pro

tect

ion

prog

ram

mes

(age

and

gen

der

disa

ggre

gate

d w

here

pos

sibl

e)

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

27.0

6%

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 28

.2%

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

Num

ber o

f in

divi

dual

s re

ache

d th

roug

h in

form

atio

n ca

mpa

igns

, be

nefit

ting

from

C

Cs,

etc

.

55

4

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ET -

ED

LOC

ATI

ON

PA

RTN

ER

S

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

O

F IM

-P

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

-N

ITIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 2

.1: E

xist

ing

mec

hani

sms

for

the

iden

tific

atio

n of

pe

rson

s w

ith s

peci

al

need

s ar

e en

hanc

ed

so th

at in

divi

dual

s ar

e id

entif

ied

and

refe

rred

to a

ppro

pria

te

inte

rven

tion/

serv

ices

, in

clud

ing

com

mu-

nity

-bas

ed s

uppo

rt gr

oups

of a

dole

scen

ts,

yout

h, a

dults

, eld

erly

an

d pa

rent

s

"# o

f tra

in-

ing,

wor

ksho

p,

even

t act

iviti

es

aim

ing

to

enha

nce

the

mec

hani

sms

for i

dent

ifi-

catio

n an

d re

ferra

l of

vuln

erab

le

refu

gees

Agen

cy/

partn

er re

le-

vant

trai

ning

st

atis

tics

# of

tra

inin

g ac

tivi -

ties

7750

00

Gov

er-

nora

tes

with

hig

h co

ncen

tra-

tion

of S

yria

n re

fuge

es

UN

HC

R,

MoF

SP,

Loca

l au-

thor

ities

and

in

stitu

tions

(i.

e. S

ASF,

M

unic

ipal

i -tie

s), c

amp

auth

oriti

es,

Partn

ers

1,55

2,50

018

5,00

05

53

# of

vul

nera

ble

indi

vidu

als

iden

tifie

d an

d re

ferre

d (g

en-

der d

isag

gre-

gate

d w

here

po

ssib

le)

Partn

er/

govt

refe

rral

reco

rds

and

refu

gee

com

mitt

ee

info

rmat

ion

# of

in

divi

d -ua

ls60

09,

000

9,60

0

20

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(AS

PA

RT

OF

THE

O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI -

TY?

Out

put 2

.3:

Com

-m

unity

sel

f-man

age-

men

t, re

pres

enta

tion

and

lead

ersh

ip

is s

uppo

rted

and

enco

urag

ed in

urb

an,

peri-

urba

n, ru

ral a

nd

cam

p se

tting

s

# of

Com

mu -

nity

Cen

ters

/ M

ulti-

Serv

ice

Cen

ters

/Saf

e Sp

aces

es -

tabl

ishe

d or

su

ppor

ted

"Age

ncy/

partn

er

stat

istic

s on

th

e nu

mbe

r of

CC

/MSC

su

ppor

ted

(par

tially

), or

es

tabl

ishe

d &

the

num

ber o

f be

nefic

ierie

s fro

m th

ese

cent

ers

# of

ce

nter

s12

Gov

er-

nora

tes

with

hig

h co

ncen

tra-

tion

of S

yria

n re

fuge

es

UN

HC

R,

IOM

, Cam

p of

ficia

ls,

Partn

ers

20,1

80,0

004,

560,

000

44

4

# of

indi

vid-

uals

ben

efit-

ting

from

ser

-vi

ces

in th

e C

omm

unity

/M

ulti-

serv

ice

cent

ers

(age

an

d ge

nder

di

sagg

re-

gate

d)

Serv

ice

cent

er

reco

rds

# of

in

divi

d-ua

ls16

4,00

016

4,00

0

Out

put 2

.5:

Out

reac

h an

d In

form

atio

n di

s-se

min

atio

n m

echa

-ni

sms

are

mai

ntai

ned

and

stre

ngth

ened

to

sup

port

two-

way

co

mm

unic

atio

n an

d ra

isin

g aw

aren

ess

of

the

refu

gee

and

host

po

pula

tions

as

wel

l as

of t

he h

uman

itari -

an c

omm

unity

# of

indi

vidu

-al

s re

ache

d

info

rmat

ion

cam

paig

ns,

activ

ities

to

rais

e pu

blic

aw

aren

ess

on ri

ghts

, en

title

men

ts,

serv

ices

, as

sist

ance

Agen

cy/

partn

er

info

rmat

ion

on

the

num

ber

of m

entio

ned

activ

ity/

initi

ativ

es u

n -de

rtake

n su

ch

as b

roch

ures

/le

afle

ts a

nd

num

ber o

f in -

divi

dual

s w

ho

wer

e re

ache

d w

ith th

ese

activ

ities

&

serv

ice

cent

er

reco

rds

# of

in

divi

d-ua

ls35

,000

357,

000

392,

000

Thro

ugho

ut

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R,

AFAD

, D

GM

M,

Loca

l au

thor

ities

, Pa

rtner

s,

Com

mun

ity

2,58

8,50

026

0,00

04

42

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

24,

321,

000

5,0

05,0

00

21


PROTECTIONB

. RE

SIL

IEN

CE

CO

MP

ON

EN

T

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

ATI

ON

UN

ITS

YR

LI

VIN

G IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

M-

MU

NI-

TIE

S

ME

M-

BE

RS

O

F IM

-P

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

-N

ITIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 2

.2: C

ontin

-ue

d an

d st

reng

th-

ened

sup

port

to

natio

nal i

nstit

utio

ns

and

partn

ers

to

prov

ide

targ

eted

as

sist

ance

and

su

ppor

t to

the

mos

t vu

lner

able

refu

gees

an

d ho

st c

omm

u-ni

ties

# of

Gov

ernm

ent

oper

ated

PSS

ce

nter

s in

cam

ps

and

in u

rban

ar

eas

supp

orte

d or

stre

ngth

ened

UN

HC

R pr

ojec

t w

ith M

oFSP

#

of

cent

ers

31

Thro

ugho

ut

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R,

IOM

, MoF

-SP

, AFA

D,

Partn

ers

10,3

00,0

002,

285,

000

55

4

# of

indi

vidu

als

iden

tifie

d an

d re

-fe

rred

for t

arge

ted

assi

stan

ce (a

ge/

gend

er d

isag

-gr

egat

ed w

here

po

ssib

le)

UN

HC

R an

d pa

rtner

dat

a on

indi

vidu

als

iden

tifie

d as

vu

lner

able

/PSN

# of

in

divi

d -ua

ls50

09,

500

10,0

00

Out

put 2

.4: S

uppo

rt to

loca

l par

tner

in

stitu

tions

in o

rder

to

stre

ngth

en c

om-

preh

ensi

ve s

uppo

rt se

rvic

es, i

n pa

rticu

-la

r psy

cho-

soci

al

supp

ort,

com

mun

i-ty

-bas

ed e

ngag

e-m

ent,

prot

ectio

n fo

r w

omen

, girl

s, b

oys

and

men

and

to

supp

ort o

ppor

tu-

nitie

s to

pro

mot

e so

cial

coh

esio

n,

mut

ually

ben

efic

ial

rela

tions

hips

and

pe

acef

ul c

o-ex

ist -

ence

# of

par

tner

s em

-po

wer

ed to

sup

-po

rt co

mm

unity

ba

sed

prot

ectio

n an

d ps

ycho

-soc

ial

supp

ort i

nter

ven -

tions

Agen

cy/p

artn

er

info

rmat

ion

on p

artn

ers

supp

orte

d fo

r co

mpr

ehen

sive

su

ppor

t ser

vic-

es s

uch

as P

SS

or s

truct

ured

op

portu

nitie

s as

men

tione

d

# of

pa

rt -ne

rs15

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, IO

M, U

ND

P,

AFAD

, D

GM

M,

Mun

ici -

palit

ies,

G

AP -R

DA,

Pa

rtner

s

16,0

40,0

0035

0,00

05

55

# of

par

tner

s an

d lo

cal i

nstit

utio

ns

supp

orte

d w

hich

pr

omot

e so

cial

co

hesi

on, m

u-tu

ally

ben

efic

ial

rela

tions

hips

and

pe

acef

ul c

o-ex

-is

tenc

e

Agen

cy/p

artn

er

info

rmat

ion

on p

artn

ers

supp

orte

d fo

r co

mpr

ehen

sive

su

ppor

t ser

vic -

es s

uch

as P

SS

or s

truct

ured

op

portu

nitie

s as

men

tione

d

# of

pa

rt-ne

rs

and

loca

l in

stitu

-tio

ns

24

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

26,

340,

000

2,6

35,0

00

22

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

The

risks

and

con

sequ

ence

s of

SG

BV

expe

rienc

ed b

y w

omen

, girl

s, b

oys

and

men

are

miti

gate

d, a

nd th

e ac

cess

to

qual

ity s

ervi

ces

is im

prov

ed.

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f ide

ntifi

ed S

GB

V su

rviv

ors

who

hav

e ac

cess

to e

ffect

ive

and

surv

ivor

-cen

tere

d SG

BV

prev

entio

n an

d re

spon

se

mec

hani

sms

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

95%

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 95

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Prog

res

and

part

ner

info

rmat

ion

on

iden

tified

and

as

sist

ed S

GB

V su

rviv

ors

and

thos

e at

risk

55

4

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ET-

AR

Y R

E-

QU

IRE

ME

NT

FOR

201

6 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TA-

BIL

ITY

?

Out

put 3

.1: R

efug

ees

and

mos

t vul

nera

ble

amon

gst

the

impa

cted

pop

ulat

ions

ha

ve in

crea

sed

acce

ss

to in

form

atio

n on

thei

r rig

hts,

saf

e, c

onfid

entia

l an

d qu

ality

mul

ti-se

ctor

al

SGBV

ser

vice

s, re

ferra

l m

echa

nism

s, a

nd to

rel -

evan

t nat

iona

l pro

tect

ion

mec

hani

sms

adap

ted

to

thei

r age

, gen

der a

nd

dive

rsity

# of

per

sons

re

ache

d th

roug

h in

form

atio

n,

educ

atio

n an

d co

mm

unic

atio

n m

ater

ials

Agen

cy/p

art -

ner i

nfor

mat

ion

on b

roch

ures

/in

form

atio

n le

afle

ts o

n SG

BV p

rinte

d an

d di

strib

uted

# of

br

o -ch

ures

di

strib

-ut

ed

300,

000

2,44

0,00

010

,000

2,75

0,00

0 Th

roug

hout

Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

DG

MM

, M

oFSP

, AF

AD,

Partn

ers

3,87

0,00

036

0,00

03

53

Out

put 3

.3: R

isks

to

SGB

V m

itiga

ted

and

redu

ced

thro

ugh

com

-m

unity

bas

ed in

itiat

ives

an

d in

crea

sed

capa

c-ity

of a

ll hu

man

itaria

n w

orke

rs in

rele

vant

se

ctor

s

# of

trai

ning

, w

orks

hop,

ev

ent a

ctiv

ities

co

nduc

ted

or

supp

orte

d on

co

nfid

entia

l, su

rviv

or-c

en-

tere

d an

d qu

al-

ity re

spon

se to

SG

BV

Trai

ning

/w

orks

hop/

even

t sta

tistic

s fro

m re

leva

nt

agen

cies

/par

t -ne

rs ta

rget

ing

hum

anita

rian

wor

kers

# of

tra

inin

g ac

tivi-

ties

89

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

UN

HC

R,

UN

FPA

, U

NIC

EF,

MoF

SP,

AFA

D,

DG

MM

, Pa

rtne

rs,

Com

mu-

nity

2,40

5,50

01,

315,

000

34

3

23


PROTECTIONA

. RE

FUG

EE

CO

MP

ON

EN

T

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

OM

-M

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TA-

BIL

ITY

?

Out

put 3

.5: S

urvi

vors

of

SG

BV h

ave

acce

ss

to e

xpan

ded

supp

ort

prog

ram

mes

# of

par

tner

s an

d ac

tors

su

ppor

ted

with

SG

BV-s

pe-

cific

act

ivity

pr

ogra

mm

ing

Agen

cy

info

rmat

ion

on

partn

ers

and/

or g

over

nmen

t in

stitu

tions

su

ppor

ted

with

SG

BV s

peci

fic

prog

ram

min

g

# of

ac

tors

su

p -po

rted

22

Gov

er-

nora

tes

with

hig

h co

ncen

tra-

tion

of S

yria

n re

fuge

es

UN

HC

R,

UN

FPA,

U

NIC

EF,

MoF

SP,

AFAD

, D

GM

M,

Partn

ers

2,78

0,00

01,

365,

000

55

5

# of

indi

vidu

als

who

rece

ive

supp

ort,

incl

ud-

ing

PSS

and

spec

ialis

t sup

-po

rt (in

divi

dual

an

d in

gro

ups)

(a

ge/g

ende

r di

sagg

rega

ted

whe

re p

ossi

ble)

Agen

cy/g

ov-

ernm

ent/p

art-

ner i

nfor

mat

ion

on h

ow m

any

indi

vidu

als,

re

ceiv

e SG

BV

spec

ific

PSS,

sp

ecia

list c

are

in in

divi

dual

s or

in g

roup

s

# of

in

divi

d -ua

ls16

,830

136,

170

153,

000

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

9,0

55,5

00

3,0

40,0

00

24

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

T-N

ER

S

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R L

IVIN

G

IN C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

M-

MU

NI-

TIE

S

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 3

.2: C

apac

ity

of g

over

nmen

t act

ors

and

serv

ices

in a

ll se

ctor

s ar

e st

reng

th-

ened

to e

ffect

ivel

y re

spon

d to

incr

ease

d SG

BV c

asel

oad

# of

indi

vidu

als

train

ed o

n st

reng

then

ing

SGBV

resp

onse

fro

m g

over

n -m

ent a

nd s

er-

vice

pro

vide

rs

Agen

cy/

partn

er

info

rmat

ion

on n

umbe

r of

gove

rnm

ent

staf

f an

d se

r -vi

ce p

rovi

ders

ta

rget

ed

thro

ugh

train

-in

g on

SG

BV

# of

in

divi

d-ua

ls87

587

5Th

roug

hout

Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

UN

FPA,

IO

M,

UN

ICEF

, AF

AD,

DG

MM

, M

oFSP

3,14

2,00

058

0,00

05

54

Out

put 3

.4: N

atio

nal

polic

ies

that

add

ress

SG

BV p

reve

ntio

n an

d re

spon

se a

re

impl

emen

ted

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

the

natio

nal l

egal

fra

mew

ork

and

inte

r-na

tiona

l sta

ndar

ds

and

are

avai

labl

e to

re

fuge

es

# of

SO

Ps d

evel

-op

ed a

nd ro

lled

out t

o ef

fect

ivel

y pr

even

t and

re-

spon

d to

SG

BV,

cons

ider

ing

spec

ific

need

s of

WG

BM a

nd

pers

ons

with

di

sabi

litie

s

"Age

ncy/

partn

er/

gove

rnm

ent

info

rmat

ion

on

deve

lopm

ent

of S

OPs

"

# of

SO

Ps1

Thro

ugho

ut

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R,

UN

FPA,

AF

AD,

DG

MM

, M

oFSP

, Ac

tors

in

the

just

ice/

lega

l sec

-to

r, la

w e

n-fo

rcem

ent

offic

ials

520,

000

55,0

005

54

# of

adv

ocac

y m

eetin

gs/

even

ts/ c

onsu

l -ta

tions

/ tra

inin

gs

cond

ucte

d fo

r im

plem

enta

-tio

n of

lega

l fra

mew

orks

on

SGBV

that

are

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

inte

rnat

iona

l st

anda

rds

and

in a

gen

der

resp

onsi

ve w

ay

SGBV

WG

an

d su

b-W

G

mee

tings

un

derta

ken

# of

ad -

voca

cy

actio

ns48

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

3,6

62,0

00

635

,000

25


PROTECTIONO

BJE

C-

TIV

E43

Girl

s an

d B

oys

affe

cted

by

the

Syria

cris

is h

ave

incr

ease

d an

d m

ore

equi

tabl

e ac

cess

to q

ualit

y ch

ild p

rote

ctio

n in

terv

entio

nsQ

1: C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t?Q

2: S

usta

inab

le

bene

fits?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 4

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f chi

ldre

n w

ho re

ceiv

e ch

ild

prot

ectio

n se

rvic

es

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

10%

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 10

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

# of

chi

ldre

n be

nefit

ting

from

C

FS a

nd o

ther

ch

ild p

rote

ctio

n se

rvic

es th

roug

h C

Cs,

etc

55

4

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

OM

-M

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(AS

PA

RT

OF

THE

O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 4

.1: C

hild

ren

at ri

sk

are

prom

ptly

iden

tifie

d an

d re

ferre

d to

chi

ld p

rote

ctio

n se

rvic

es in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

natio

nal l

egal

fra

mew

ork

# of

par

tner

s su

ppor

ted

with

ch

ild p

rote

ctio

n sp

ecifi

c ac

tivity

pr

ogra

mm

ing

Agen

cy in

for -

mat

ion

on #

of

partn

ers

with

C

P sp

ecifi

c pr

ogra

ms

# of

pa

rt -ne

rs11

Thro

ugho

ut

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, M

oFSP

, Pa

rtner

s

1,48

0,00

01,

480,

000

55

4

# of

chi

ldre

n w

ith p

rote

ctio

n ne

eds

iden

tifie

d an

d re

ferre

d to

spe

cial

ized

se

rvic

es

Gov

ernm

ent

figur

es o

n Sy

rian

girls

/bo

ys in

chi

ld

prot

ectio

n in

stitu

tions

+

UN

ICEF

fig

ures

# of

ch

ildre

n13

097

011

00

26

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

I-FI

CA

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

OM

-M

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(AS

PA

RT

OF

THE

O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 4

.3: E

nhan

ced

evid

ence

bas

ed a

dvo-

cacy

con

duct

ed o

n ke

y ch

ild p

rote

ctio

n is

sues

, in

clud

ing

child

righ

ts

viol

atio

ns

# of

adv

oca-

cy a

ctio

ns

unde

rtake

n on

chi

ld

prot

ectio

n is

sues

with

du

ty b

eare

rs

Info

rmat

ion

from

ag

enci

es/p

artn

ers

on m

onito

ring,

re

ferra

l and

adv

o -ca

cy in

terv

entio

ns

at lo

cal/c

entra

l on

sim

plifi

ed

birth

regi

stra

tion

proc

edur

es,

child

m

arria

ge, c

hild

la

bor m

echa

nism

s,

asse

ssm

ents

un

derta

ken

on

CP

- suc

h as

m

onito

ring

mis

sion

s to

the

UAS

C o

r ch

ild in

stitu

tions

or

prot

ectio

n m

onito

r -in

g m

issi

ons,

and

C

PWG

mee

tings

an

d re

leva

nt P

/CS

wg

mee

tings

and

pr

ovin

cial

boa

rds

mee

ting

of U

NIC

EF

# of

ad -

voca

cy

actio

ns30

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, Pa

rtner

s27

0,00

027

0,00

03

43

Out

put 4

.5: C

omm

uni-

ty-b

ased

chi

ld p

rote

c-tio

n in

terv

entio

ns a

nd

serv

ices

are

ava

ilabl

e fo

r girl

s an

d bo

ys

affe

cted

by

the

Syria

cr

isis

incl

udin

g PS

S

# o

f chi

ldre

n (s

ex d

isag

-gr

egat

ed)

parti

cipa

ting

in s

truct

ured

, su

stai

ned

child

pr

otec

tion

or

psyc

ho-s

o -ci

al s

uppo

rt pr

ogra

mm

es

(indi

vidu

al

and

in

grou

ps)

Agen

cy/p

artn

er

info

rmat

ion

on

num

ber o

f chi

ldre

n (g

irls

and

boys

) re

ceiv

ing

PSS

as

indi

vidu

als

or in

gr

oups

- in

clud

ing

PSS

thro

ugh

CFS

; in

clud

ing

num

ber o

f BI

A/BI

D u

nder

take

n by

UN

HC

R/go

vern

-m

ent/p

artn

ers

# of

ch

ildre

n9,

900

80,1

0090

,000

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, Pa

rtne

rs6,

600,

000

6,60

0,00

05

55

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

8,3

50,0

00

8,3

50,0

00

27


PROTECTIONB

. RE

SIL

IEN

CE

CO

MP

ON

EN

T

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

T-N

ER

S

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R L

IVIN

G

IN C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

M-

MU

NI-

TIE

S

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 4

.2:

Cap

acity

of c

hild

pr

otec

tion

acto

rs

and

natio

nal s

ervi

ces

are

stre

ngth

ened

, an

d m

echa

nism

s to

pr

even

t and

resp

ond

to c

hild

pro

tect

ion

risks

, inc

ludi

ng

inte

r-sec

tora

l co

ordi

natio

n, a

re e

n -ha

nced

, par

ticul

arly

in

em

erge

ncie

s, in

th

e fra

mew

ork

of th

e ex

istin

g le

gisl

atio

n

# of

indi

vidu

als

train

ed o

n ch

ild p

rote

ctio

n m

echa

nism

s fro

m g

over

n-m

ent a

nd s

er-

vice

pro

vide

rs

Agen

cy/

partn

er

info

rmat

ion

on n

umbe

r of

gov

ern -

men

t sta

ff

and

serv

ice

prov

ider

s ta

r -ge

ted

thro

ugh

train

ing

on

SGBV

incl

ud-

ing

UN

ICEF

da

ta o

n #

of e

xper

ts

and

deci

sion

m

aker

s in

th

e pr

ovin

cial

bo

ards

trai

ned

# of

in

divi

d -ua

ls12

2512

25

Thro

ugho

ut

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, M

oFSP

, AF

AD,

DG

MM

, Pa

rtner

s

3,83

7,50

03,

837,

500

55

5

SOPs

on

child

pr

otec

tion

deve

lope

d

SOP

on B

ID/

BIA

and

Chi

ld

Prot

ectio

nYe

s/N

oY

es

Out

put 4

.4:

Impr

oved

life

op

port

uniti

es

are

crea

ted

for

Syria

n an

d Tu

rkis

h af

fect

ed a

dole

s-ce

nts

thro

ugh

peer

sup

port

for

soci

al a

dapt

atio

n,

yout

h m

obili

zatio

n an

d ad

voca

cy, t

o en

hanc

e so

cial

in

clus

ion

and

redu

ce c

hild

pr

otec

tion

risks

# of

you

th

mob

ilized

and

en

rolle

d in

you

th

led

initi

ativ

es"

# of

you

th

atte

ndin

g sp

ecia

lized

co

urse

s su

ch

as li

fe s

kills

pr

ogra

ms

for

adol

esce

nt

girls

/boy

s (e

nsur

e no

ov

erla

p w

ith

Educ

atio

n or

Li

velih

oods

)

# of

yo

uth"

1,76

0"14

,240

"16

,000

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

UN

HC

R,

UN

ICEF

, Pa

rtne

rs4,

120,

000

4,12

0,00

05

55

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

7,9

57,5

00

7,9

57,5

00

28

PROTECTION

SECTOR FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS BY AGENCY

AGENCY/ORGANIZATIONREQUIREMENTS (USD) REFUGEE

COMPONENT 2016REQUIREMENTS (USD) RESIL-

IENCE COMPONENT 2016TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (USD)

FOR 2016

UNHCR 55,006,000 21,982,500 76,988,500

UNICEF 8,120,000 4,500,000 12,620,000

UNFPA 4,300,500 882,000 5,182,500

IOM 2,000,000 1,100,000 3,100,000

UNDP - 13,000,000 13,000,000

TOTAL 69,426,500 41,464,500 110,891,000

29


FOOD SECURITYSECTOR RESPONSE Lead Agencies World Food Programme

Partners International Organisation for Migration, Food and Agriculture Organiza-tion of the United Nations and four NGO partners

Objectives

1. Support stable access to food for the most vulnerable population

impacted by the Syrian crisis.

2. Promote food availability and support sustainable production.

3. Promote utilisation of diversified and quality food.

4. Enhance effective and coordinated food security response.

GENDER MARKER 0

REFUGEE FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT 2016

USD 238,490,868

RESILIENCE FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT 2016

USD 1,904,132

3RP TOTAL FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT 2016

USD 240,395,000

FOOD SECURITY

184,938

60

4,000

574,914

1,000

5,000

%0 %20 %40 %60 %80 %100

# of targeted population who receive food assistance.

# of persons trained on enhancing small scale and familyfarming production

# of Syrians having access to the food kitchens






FOR 2016

UNHCR 55,006,000 21,982,500 76,988,500

UNICEF 8,120,000 4,500,000 12,620,000

UNFPA 4,300,500 882,000 5,182,500

IOM 2,000,000 1,100,000 3,100,000

UNDP - 13,000,000 13,000,000

TOTAL 69,426,500 41,464,500 110,891,000

30

CURRENT SITUATION Food security remains one of the greatest needs for Syrian refugees living in Turkey. Hosting almost half of the 4.2 million displaced Syrians in the region, over the past three years the Government of Turkey has borne the largest share of the refugee burden. Now more than ever, Turkey needs a surge in support and commitment from the international community to boost the two-pillar response approach meeting the needs of both Syrian refugees and the resilience of the host country to withstand potential further influxes.

In camps the Government and partners implement innovative food assistance programmes that meet the daily needs of just over 260,000 Syrians. Whilst in the community, actors, including local government; UN agencies; community based organizations; and international and national non-government organizations (NGOs) support the most vulnerable populations through various assistance modalities, such as in-kind emergency food distributions, hot-food

kitchens and cash-based interventions.

In late 2012, WFP, in partnership with the Turkish Red Crescent (TRC) and in cooperation with the Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD), set up an electronic voucher programme, recognized by the Turkish Government as being among the most valuable contribution to the Syrian refugee crisis response, as it yields large savings to the Government and facilitates harmonized food-assistance to Syrians in camps in Turkey. Food security in 11 camps is covered through a partnership with AFAD, whereby the UN provides 50 Turkish liras (TL) per person per month to the TRC e-food card and AFAD provides 35 TL per person per month to the AFAD e-card for food and non-food items. Monitoring activities in these camps show that 97 percent of the interviewed beneficiaries have an acceptable Food Consumption Score (FCS). Data analysis revealed that the FCS is positively correlated to the duration of stay in the

camp and to the participation in the e-voucher programme. In the remaining 12 camps, AFAD covers the entirety of the food security requirements of camp residents.

Owing in part to the enormity of the Syrian refugee population residing in the community, (which has reached 1.7 million in September 2015); in urban, peri-urban and rural settings, the food security needs are to date, unquantifiable. The Government, local communities, UN and NGOs attempt to target food assistance to only the extremely vulnerable. Over the course of the first nine months of 2015, 3RP actors were able to assist approximately 150,000 individuals living in the community, through various food assistance transfer modalities. The majority of food security programmes use an electronic voucher modality, whereby beneficiaries may redeem vouchers for food in participating supermarkets.

©WFP / Berna Cetin

31


FOOD SECURITY


[1] The columns for target population are only for direct beneficiaries where accurate numbers are available. If you have estimates of indirect beneficiaries for resil-ience building (i.e.: of systems-strengthening, institutional capacity-building, etc.), please include this in the narrative section below rather than in the table.

[2] For each ‘other’ population group (i.e.: PRS, PRL) please add additional rows. Remove rows which are not applicable in your country.

A. Population Group Age GroupsRefugee Resilience

Population In Need

Target Population[1]

Population In Need

Target Population


Men 34,922 1,145

Women 35,075 1,150

Boys 42,700 1,400

Girls 39,955 1,310

Sub Total 152,500 5,000


Men 168,544

Women 169,280

Boys 206,080

Girls 192,832

Sub Total 736,000


Men 1,030

Women 1,035

Boys 1,260

Girls 1,179

Sub Total 4,500

Other Group (1)[2]

Men

Women

Boys

Girls

Sub Total

Other Group (2)

Men

Women

Boys

Girls

Sub Total

Grand Total 888,500 9,500

*Without a comprehensive needs assessment it is not currently possible to estimate the population in need, therefore, these figures represent the total assumed population in 2016.

32

©WFP / Berna Cetin

As no formal comprehensive needs assessment exists on the status of refugees living in the community, it has been difficult to quantify and identify the most vulnerable populations and to determine the most appropriate larger-scale assistance programmes to implement in cooperation with the Government. With resources stretched to the limit, a lack of humanitarian agencies implementing off-camp programmes, and as the number of Syrians living in the community increases and their food-security deteriorates over time, the need for a unified and efficient system to identify and serve only the most vulnerable refugee population living in the community will be vital in 2016. Therefore, priority needs include a joint needs assessment with the Government and a harmonized approach to cash-based interventions among partners.

Ensuring non-discriminatory access to food for the most vulnerable is critical in mitigating protection risks and vulnerabilities faced by the refugees. Throughout 2015, the Food Security sector partners have strenghthed humanitarian coordination mechanisms for non-camp cash based intervention (CBI) actors and activities. The Food Security Working Group facilitates a more focussed review and implementation of food security needs, responses, gaps and coordination in consultation with the other sector working groups, donors and Government authorities. The establishment of the Vulnerability Sub-working Group in late 2015 will aim to develop a vulnerability tool to be used by CBI implementing actors across sectors and thus facilitate an increased understanding of vulnerability and its application in programming in Turkey.

The 3RP actors plan to provide targeted food assistance to approximately 735,000 of the most vulnerable refugees living in the community, which equates to assisting approximately 30 per cent of the projected population of 2.45 million Syrians in the community. The plan seek to meet the needs of the most vulnerable and is also in alignment with government priorities. The 3RP FS chapter represents a response plan based on the currently available

information which will be further refined once comprehensive needs assessments are completed. As a result of these assessment, FS actors will endeavour to scale-up interventions throughout the

year in order to target assistance to as many identified vulnerable Syrians as possible in addition to the plans detailed within the 3RP.

33


FOOD SECURITY

STRATEGIC VISION & RESPONSE PLANThe principal objective for Food Security sector actors in 2016 is to support stable access to food for the most vulnerable population impacted by the Syrian crisis. The target population for these interventions equates to 32 per cent of the total 2016 assumed Syrian refugee population in Turkey: only 30 per cent of refugees living in the community and 50 per cent of the camp population.

Through strengthened coordination and participation in technical working groups dedicated to the harmonization of the way vulnerability is approached and interventions are standardised, WFP, FAO, IOM and the four NGO 3RP partners hope to achieve narrow targeting of assistance to only those in dire need. As

cash based interventions emerge as the most efficient and preferred modality for delivering food assistance in Turkey, 3RP actors plan to further develop cash based transfer activities and opportunities within the country context.

The UN monitoring and evaluation (M&E) reports from September, 2015 reflect that the average cost of the WFP referential food basket is 62 TL. The current e-voucher transfer of 50 TL per person per month shall be maintained inside and outside of camps on the TRC e-food card in 2016. Through directly working together, the Food Security sector has established a robust food security programme in partnership with the Turkish authorities, which enables beneficiaries

to shop for their food of choice in markets both inside and outside of camps. The injection of cash into the local economy through the TRC e-food card is estimated at just less than USD 27 million in 2015 and over USD 136.5 since the beginning of the e-voucher programme in 2012.

Partnerships with the Government is not limited to in-camp programmes. Whilst the Government is not supplementing 3RP partners’ e-voucher food assistance to refugees living in the community directly, it plays an integral part in working with and supporting the implementation of activities. In some cases, 3RP actors and government bodies are working together on national safety nets, such as supporting the Social Assistance Foundation’s (SSAF) hot-food kitchen in Gaziantep, and working hand-in-hand with the Ministry of Interior Directorate General of Migration Management (DGMM), governors’ offices and SSAF to identify and assist the most vulnerable Syrians living amongst the Turkish community. Via the implementation of assistance programmes with government bodies, national safety nets profit from partnerships based on knowledge sharing, systems strengthening and augmentation of service delivery.

3RP partners will continue to engage Government counterparts to support and strengthen food security programmes and strategies. Food security actors aim to implement large-scale, harmonised food assistance activities that bolster national safety-nets and facilitate an enhanced understanding of vulnerability and improved targeting of assistance for all partners’ programmes. Furthermore the capacity building of local and national NGOs through programme implementation partnerships and the provision of technical assistance is a priority area for FS actors. In addition, where possible the Food Security Sector will implement livelihoods activities to support the resilience needs of the affected populations.©WFP / Barkin Bulbul

34

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

Supp

ort s

tabl

e ac

cess

to fo

od fo

r the

mos

t vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

n im

pact

ed b

y th

e Sy

rian

cris

is

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f tar

gete

d po

pula

tion

who

re

ceiv

e fo

od a

ssis

tanc

e

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

N/A

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 10

0%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Dis

tribu

tion

and

mon

itorin

g re

port

s

SE

CT

OR

RE

SP

ON

SE

OV

ER

VIE

W T

AB

LE

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TA-

BIL

ITY

?

Out

put 1

.1: T

arge

ted

food

ass

ista

nce

prov

ided

to th

e m

ost

vuln

erab

le th

roug

h va

rious

tran

sfer

m

odal

ities

Num

ber o

f in

divi

dual

s re

ceiv

ing

food

ass

is-

tanc

e

Org

ani-

zatio

ns,

repo

rts,

mon

itorin

g

Num

ber

of in

di-

vidu

als

150,

000

734,

500

884,

500

Kilis

, G

azia

ntep

, Sa

nliu

rfa,

Adan

a,

Hat

ay, o

th-

ers

TBC

WFP

, IO

M

and

4 N

GO

pa

rtner

s23

7,33

5,73

60

00

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

237

,335

,736

-

35


FOOD SECURITYO

BJE

CT

IVE

2Pr

omot

e fo

od a

vaila

bilit

y an

d su

ppor

t sus

tain

able

pro

duct

ion

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

IN

DIC

AT

OR

# of

targ

eted

indi

vidu

als

bene

fitin

g fro

m fa

rmin

g pr

oduc

tion

thro

ugh

mic

ro

grde

ning

inita

itive

s

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

0

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 1,

000

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

Trai

ning

and

m

onito

ring

repo

rts

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 2

.1: E

n-ha

nced

sm

all s

cale

an

d fa

mily

farm

ing

prod

uctio

n th

roug

h m

icro

-gar

deni

ng

initi

ativ

es

# of

peo

ple

train

ed in

m

icro

-gar

-de

ning

in

itiat

ives

Trai

ning

At

tend

ance

re

ports

Num

ber

of in

di-

vidu

als

1,00

01,

000

Gaz

iant

ep,

Oth

ers

(TBC

)FA

O25

0,00

010

0,00

04

54

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

250

,000

1

00,0

00

36

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S

OF

VE

RI-

FIC

ATI

ON

UN

ITS

YR

LI

VIN

G IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

M-

MU

NI-

TIE

S

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 2

.2: E

nhan

ce

smal

l sca

le a

nd fa

mily

fa

rmin

g pr

oduc

tion

# of

peo

ple

train

ed in

sm

all s

cale

an

d fa

mily

fa

rmin

g pr

oduc

tion

Trai

ning

At -

tend

ance

re

ports

Num

-be

r of

peop

le1,

000

1,00

0G

azia

ntep

, O

ther

s (T

BC)

FAO

250,

000

100,

000

45

5

Out

put 2

.3: I

mpr

oved

ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duct

ion

thro

ugh

clim

ate

smar

t pr

ogra

mm

es

# of

peo

ple

train

ed in

cl

imat

e sm

art

prog

ram

me

deve

lop-

men

t

Trai

ning

At -

tend

ance

re

ports

Num

-be

r of

peop

le1,

500

1,50

0G

azia

ntep

, O

ther

s (T

BC)

FAO

200,

000

50,0

005

54

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

450

,000

1

50,0

00

37


FOOD SECURITYO

BJE

CT

IVE

3Pr

omot

e ut

ilisa

tion

of d

iver

sifie

d an

d qu

ality

food

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

IN

DIC

AT

OR

# of

indi

vidu

als

that

ben

efitte

d fro

m tr

aini

ngs

and

are

able

to

mak

e m

ore

educ

ated

dec

isio

ns

on th

eir n

utrit

iona

l and

hea

lth

stat

us

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

0

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 1,

000

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

Trai

ning

and

m

onito

ring

repo

rts

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 3

.1: R

aise

d aw

aren

ess

of g

ood

nutri

tiona

l pra

ctic

es

# of

indi

vid-

uals

trai

ned

good

nu

tritio

nal

prac

tices

Trai

ning

At

tend

ance

re

ports

Num

-be

r of

peop

le50

050

01,

000

Gaz

iant

ep,

Oth

ers

(TBC

)FA

O50

,000

20,0

003

43

Out

put 3

.3: P

rom

ote

and

prov

ide

nutri

tion-

al s

uppo

rt to

targ

eted

vu

lner

able

gro

ups.

# of

indi

vid-

uals

trai

ned

good

nu

tritio

nal

prac

tices

Trai

ning

At

tend

ance

re

ports

Num

-be

r of

peop

le10

0010

002,

000

Gaz

iant

ep,

Oth

ers

(TBC

)FA

O10

0,00

050

,000

35

3

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

150

,000

70

,000

38

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S

OF

VE

RI-

FIC

ATI

ON

UN

ITS

YR

LI

VIN

G IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 3

.2: R

aise

d aw

aren

ess

of g

ood

nutri

tiona

l pra

ctic

es

# of

peo

ple

train

ed

Trai

ning

At-

tend

ance

re

ports

Num

-be

r of

peop

le1,

000

1,00

0G

azia

ntep

, O

ther

s (T

BC)

FAO

50,0

0020

,000

45

3

Out

put 3

.4: F

ood

safe

ty m

easu

res

and

polic

ies

enha

nced

# of

peo

ple

train

ed

Trai

ning

At -

tend

ance

re

ports

Num

-be

r of

peop

le1,

000

1,00

0G

azia

ntep

, O

ther

s (T

BC)

FAO

100,

000

50,0

005

43

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

150

,000

7

0,00

0

39


FOOD SECURITY

OB

JEC

TIV

E 4

Enha

nce

effe

ctiv

e an

d co

ordi

nate

d fo

od s

ecur

ity re

spon

seQ

1: C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t?Q

2: S

usta

inab

le

bene

fits?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 4

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f foo

d se

curit

y pr

ogra

mm

es

adhe

ring

to F

SWG

dev

elop

ed

proc

esse

s; in

clud

ing

prog

ram

me

desi

gn a

nd im

plem

enta

tion,

pa

rtic

ipat

ion

in c

oord

inat

ion

and

info

rmat

ion

shar

ing

mec

hani

sms

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

50-8

0%

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 95

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Reg

ular

en

gage

men

t by

all

FS a

ctor

s in

coo

rdin

atio

n fo

rum

s (%

of

atte

ndan

ce).

% o

f FS

acto

rs

uplo

adin

g pr

ogra

mm

e do

cum

ents

to

foru

m

repo

sito

ries.

% o

f FS

act

ors

givi

ng

pres

enta

tions

in

foru

ms.

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

T -N

ER

S

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

-IN

G IN

C

OM

-M

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 4

.1: F

ood

secu

rity

data

and

in

form

atio

n co

llect

ed,

anal

ysed

and

dis

-se

min

ated

% o

f foo

d se

ctor

m

eetin

gs, %

of F

S ac

tors

atte

ndan

ce,

% o

f FS

acto

rs u

p -lo

adin

g pr

ogra

mm

e do

cum

ents

to

foru

m re

posi

to-

ries

and

givi

ng

pres

enta

tions

in

foru

ms.

Mee

ting

min

utes

, wor

k-sh

op re

ports

, re

posi

tory

m

onito

ring,

Per-

cent

age

95%

WFP

334,

262

55

2

Out

put 4

.2: F

ood

secu

rity

inte

rven

-tio

ns a

re e

ffect

ivel

y co

ordi

nate

d w

ithin

an

d ac

ross

sec

tors

% o

f oth

er

sect

ors

that

re

flect

FS

rela

ted

obje

ctiv

es in

pro

-gr

amm

e de

sign

an

d m

onito

ring,

%

of o

ther

sec

tor

acto

rs c

om-

plem

entin

g FS

ac

tiviti

es

Mon

thly

qu

estio

n-na

ire w

ith F

S ac

tors

and

ot

her s

ecto

r ac

tors

, Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

/ atte

ndan

ce

of F

S fo

rum

s

Per-

cent

-ag

e95

%N

GO

Pa

rtne

rs42

0,87

05

52

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

755

,132

-

40

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S

OF

VE

RI-

FIC

ATI

ON

UN

ITS

YR

LI

VIN

G IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

OM

-M

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 4

.3: S

uppo

rt na

tiona

l foo

d se

curit

y st

rate

gy fo

rmul

atio

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

% im

-pr

ovem

ent

Nat

iona

l ca

paci

ty

inde

x

Cap

acity

an

alys

isPe

r-ce

ntag

eTu

rkey

WFP

704

,132

3

43

# of

Syr

ians

ha

ving

ac -

cess

to fo

od

kitc

hens

Mon

itorin

g re

ports

# of

in

divi

d -ua

ls5,

000

5,00

0G

azia

ntep

IOM

600

,000

4

22

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

1,3

04,1

32

-

41


FOOD SECURITY




IENCE COMPONENT 2016TOTAL REQUIREMENTS

(USD) FOR 2016

World Food Programme 212,739,868 704,132 213,444,000

Food and Agriculture Organ-ization

400,000 600,000 1,000,000

International Ogranization for Migration

5,500,000 600,000 6,100,000

NGO Partners 19,851,000 - 19,851,000

TOTAL 238,490,868 1,904,132 240,395,000

42

Lead Agencies UNHCR, UNICEF

PartnersMinistry of National Education (MoNE), Prime Ministry for Emergency and Disaster Management Agency (AFAD), Presidency for Turks Abroad and Related Communities (YTB), IOM

Objectives1

1. Ensure sustained access to formal, non-formal and informal education programmes for refugee children, youth and adults in camps and living in communities that are inclusive and promote life-long learning.

2. Increase the quality of education for Syrian refugee children and youth in protective learning environments, in camps and host communities

GENDER MARKER 0


US$ 89,090,000


US$ 28,325,000


US$ 117,415,000

EDUCATIONSECTOR RESPONSE

226,944

2,740

17,763

13,128

6,500

77

5,300

345,000

9,000

100,000

5,750

24,600

70

4,150

%0 %20 %40 %60 %80 %100

# of school age children enrolled in school

# of children receiving subsidized school transportation

# of targeted children (17-5) b/g enrolled in non-formal orinformal education and/or life skills activities

# of youth and adults participating in language trainingprogrammes

# of education personnel trained

# of educational facilities constructed, refurbished or renovated

# of Syrian volunteer teachers provided with financial incentives



1 The 3RP chapter of Turkey is consistent with the education-related component of the Regional No Lost Generation Initiative which covers 3 objectives, includ-ing system strengthening. In this plan “national education system strengthening” elements are reflected at the output level under two objectives (access and quality) and not as a separate objective.

43


As of late 2015, almost 400,000 of an estimated 663,1382 Syrian refugee children (6-17 years) in Turkey are not enrolled in formal education programmes and large numbers of youth require access to skills training, language programmes and higher education. Increasing access to educational services and enhancing the quality of provision remain key priorities for the sector.

The education response is led by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) and Syrian refugee children may attend Turkish public schools or temporary education centres (TECs) established in camps and host communities, the latter offering instruction in Arabic using a modified version of the Syrian curriculum. The provision of non-formal education for children and adolescents will be scaled up in line with the principles of the No Lost Generation initiative.

At the close of the 2014/2015 school year, 212,009 children were attending formal education programmes3 in camps and urban areas (74,097 in camps, 101,257 in TECs in host communities and 36,655 in Turkish schools) reflecting a significant increase from 2013/2014. Enrolment rates are highest in the lower grades, with numbers dropping sharply in the higher grades. Specific interventions are needed to address the factors affecting boys’ and girls’ enrolment rates in secondary school, including expectations that children and youth will contribute to family income. Children with special education needs and minorities are at increased risk of exclusion.

The national system is under pressure to expand in order to accommodate Syrian refugee children. Increased enrolments, larger classes and the use of Turkish public schools after-hours place greater strain on school infrastructure and increase operational and maintenance costs. Teachers in Turkish schools require

assistance in order to adapt materials and methods to address the needs of students who are not proficient in Turkish or need additional academic or psycho-social support. The number of Syrian volunteer teachers benefiting from regular financial incentives and the amount paid needs to be increased, along with opportunities for professional development.

MoNE is taking noteworthy steps to ensure that refugee students’ school attendance and academic achievement is certified. In June 2015 MoNE conducted an Equivalency Examination for Foreign Students, administered in Arabic, for Syrian and Iraqi high school (Grade 12) students.

There is a high demand for Turkish language courses offered free by MoNE’s Public Education Centres and NGOs, which will support access to skills training opportunities, and promote self-reliance and social integration. The Presidency for Turks Abroad (YTB) subsidises access to advanced Turkish language programmes, facilitating access to higher education. Demand for all language programmes exceeds the current levels of provision.

The Government of Turkey has waived university tuition fees for Syrian students and provides 1,000 full scholarships for Syrian refugees each year. Large numbers of Syrian youth wish to enrol in universities but cannot due to financial or language constraints.

EDUCATION

CURRENT SITUATION

©UNICEF/ Noorani

2 Based on a population of 1.93 million registered Syrian refugees in Turkey as of the end of August 2015, and Syrian school age children calculated at 34.20% of the total population.3 Based on enrolments in Grades 1-12 are reported by the Ministry of National Education as of June 2015.

44



Population In Need




Men 19,620 5,050 19,620 2,500

Women 19,620 5,050 19,620 2,500

Boys 65,000 56,250 65,000 50,000

Girls 65,000 56,250 65,000 50,000

Sub Total 169,240 122,600 169,240 105,000


Men 160,230 12,075 160,230 7,500

Women 160,230 12,075 160,230 7,500

Boys 423,850 187,500 423,850 150,000

Girls 423,850 187,500 423,850 150,000

Sub Total 1,168,160 399,150 1,168,160 315,000


Men data not available 5250 data not available 4,000

Women data not available 5250 data not available 4,000

Boys data not available 15,500 data not available 14,125

Girls data not available 15,500 data not available 14,125

Sub Total N/A 41,500 N/A 36,250

Grand Total 1,337,400 563,250 1,337,400 456,250

Access to all educational services needs to expand significantly in 2016Participation rates in all educational sub-sectors need to be enhanced through increasing access to national institutions and expanding the provision of quality formal schooling, non-formal education, language and skills training, and university preparation programmes. The number of refugees is expected to rise in 2016 and provision will need to expand rapidly to address the needs of newcomers and the almost 400,000 children who are currently out of school. As enrolment rates in camps are relatively high, expansion of access to education will focus on refugees living in the community in 2016, where less than 30 per cent of children are in school, while maintaining levels of access and quality of provision in camps. Financing teachers’ incentives and providing professional development

is critical for teacher retention, recognition and improving the quality of classroom teaching.

Small-scale assessments have shown that interventions are needed that address barriers to enrolment, including the creation of additional educational spaces and addressing economic factors that limit educational participation as families prioritize expenditure on basic needs over school transport and materials. Response strategies need to address economic barriers to education, particularly the provision of safe, regular transportation between home and school.

As refugee students enter the national system in greater numbers, programmes designed to promote proficiency in the language of instruction, provide academic support for refugee students,

promote social inclusion in schools and maintain mother tongue proficiency are needed.

Outreach and advocacy remain an important part of the response strategy as refugee families are not always aware of the full range of educational opportunities available (including formal education, language and skills training and higher education).

Many children have been out of school for three or more years and need specialized support in order to reintegrate into formal education programmes, and academic support is needed for those already in school. Informal and non-formal programmes are needed for children and youth that facilitate access to other educational and skills training pathways.

45


STRATEGIC VISION & RESPONSE PLAN

Demand for access to higher education is high, as evidenced by the almost 6,000 applications received for the DAFI4 scholarship programme and more than 4,000 applications for Government-supported scholarships for Syrian refugees. However, many are unable to benefit from the university tuition fee waiver as they are unable to meet the Turkish language proficiency requirements for admission.

By the end of 2016, refugee population estimates predict that there will be 990,000 school age refugee children living in Turkey. MoNE aims to ensure that 460,000 children are enrolled by the end of the 2016 school year, doubling current enrolments. In addition, MONE with other key stakeholders in education will encourage the scale up of innovative approaches to reach 40,000 children and adolescents through a wider range of educational opportunities in non-formal settings with services provided s through a wide range of actors including NGOs and INGOs. Significant budget increases are required to scale up the response in all education sub-sectors, and expand the coverage and raise rates of teacher incentives.

Objective 1:

Ensure sustained access to formal, and non-formal education programmes for refugee children, youth and adults in camps and living in communities that are inclusive and promote life-long learning.

Objective 2:

Increase the quality of education for Syrian refugee children and youth in protective learning environments, in camps and host communities. The No Lost Generation Initiative, which frames the Turkey education sector’s vision and priorities for 2016, focuses on scaling up supply of and access to quality educational services for refugees of all ages in both

schools and non-formal settings and mobilizing and engaging communities to increase demand for these services, while strengthening the national education system and other national institutions to respond to the refugee crisis.

Initiatives which started in 2015 related to increasing access to education will be continued and expanded. These include: construction of prefabricated schools to house TECs, expanding national capacity, establishing second shift TECs utilizing Turkish school buildings, supporting teachers incentives and training, outreach to students, contributing to the operating costs of educational institutions, and the

provision of material support including subsidized transportation to students.

Access to early childhood education for both Turkish and Syrian pre-primary aged children and inclusive education opportunities will be expanded in a way that will strengthen the national system. Informal education programmes for out-of-school children and youth will be expanded through NGO partners and will focus on supporting reintegration into the formal system or providing supportive programmes that will lay the foundation for access to other learning pathways, including distance education, life skills and entrepreneurship for youth.

EDUCATION

©UNICEF / YURTSEVER

4 Deutsche Akademische Flüchtlingsinitiative or Albert Einstein German Academic Refugee Initiative

46

Initiatives addressing the educational needs of adolescents and youth will be expanded through the establishment and expansion of informal and non-formal life skills and skill development programmes offered by MoNE and NGOs. Higher education preparation and scholarship programmes will be expanded through collaboration with higher education institutions, donors and YTB. The recognition of accredited online higher education programmes will be discussed with relevant state authorities.

Turkish language programmes will be provided for children, youth and adults in order to provide access to education and skills development programmes offered by Turkish national institutions and to facilitate social integration. The ability to communicate with peers, neighbors and authorities yields protection dividends, supports social integration, and contributes to self-reliance. Current provision will be expanded and state institutions supported to ensure that curricula are responsive to refugees’ needs.

Existing efforts to enhance the quality of education offered in TECs, which include payment of teacher incentives to reduce turn-over and enhance motivation and the provision of professional development and delivery of teaching materials, will continue and be expanded. The payment

of regular teacher incentives to volunteer teachers is a core element in ensuring teacher retention, enhancing motivation and recognizing volunteers’ professional contribution. The quality of educational provision will be enhanced through the provision of core learning support materials to students and schools, professional development opportunities for education personnel in TECs and state schools and supporting the Ministry in recognizing and certifying learning achievements.

By its very nature, education contributes directly to building the resilience of both individuals and communities and creates safe spaces and a sense of normalcy for the youth within the greater community. At the same time as increasing access to and improving the quality of formal schooling, access to language training and skills development programmes will be prioritized in order to strengthen opportunities for social cohesion and interaction between the host and refugee communities, and providing opportunities for self-reliance.

All activities carried out related to formal and non-formal education are planned and implemented in partnership with MoNE. As the national system expands to accommodate additional students and educational infrastructure is used to operate second-shift TECs, a range

of programmes will be implemented to ensure that the quality of education offered through these institutions is not adversely affected by the refugee influx. Programmes to support and enhance the data management, planning and response capacity of the Ministry at different levels, such as through provincial action plans, will continue in 2016. Efficiencies of scale will be achieved through enhancing access to state institutions and utilizing existing infrastructure to offer additional educational places.

Vocational and skills training activities within the Education sector are limited to those provided by MoNE institutions. Synergies will be sought with the Livelihoods sector with respect to skills training, supporting entrepreneurship, and safe access to income generating activities.

Linkages between education and protection will be strengthened through collaboration with child protection actors and application of lessons learned from informal education programmes. Education management systems will be strengthened to support in the collection and analysis of relevant inter-sectoral data to monitor education service provision and identify gaps that could be addressed by other sectors.

©IOM/ Selen Muldur

47


EDUCATION

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

ATI

ON

UN

IT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

-E

TAR

Y

RE

QU

IRE

-M

EN

T FO

R

2016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(AS

PA

RT

OF

THE

O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TA-

BIL

ITY

?

1.1

Syria

n re

fuge

e ch

ildre

n an

d ch

ildre

n in

vul

nera

ble

host

co

mm

uniti

es h

ave

incr

ease

d ac

cess

to

com

mun

ity-b

ased

ear

ly

child

hood

edu

catio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

# of

chi

ldre

n (T

urki

sh a

nd

Syria

n re

fuge

es)

enro

lled

in E

CE

cent

res

YOBI

S - M

inis

try

of N

atio

nal E

d -uc

atio

n Fo

reig

n St

uden

t Inf

orm

a-tio

n M

anag

emen

t Sy

stem

(Ya

banc

ı Ö

ğrenc

iler B

ilgi

ğğlet

im S

iste

mi)

# of

pe

rson

s 1

0,00

0 2

5,00

0 2

5,00

0 6

0,00

0

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

ns o

f Sy

rians

MoN

E,

AFAD

, N

GO

s6,

750,

000

6,75

0,00

05

54

1.3

Syr

ian

refu

gee

boys

, girl

s an

d yo

uth,

in

clud

ing

thos

e w

ith

spec

ial e

duca

tiona

l ne

eds,

livi

ng in

urb

an

area

s ha

ve in

crea

sed

acce

ss to

sch

oolin

g w

hile

thos

e liv

ing

in

cam

ps m

aint

ain

curre

nt

leve

ls o

f acc

ess

# of

Syr

ian

refu

gee

child

ren

enro

lled

in

scho

ols

(Gra

des

1-12

)

YOBI

S#

of

child

ren

100

,000

3

00,0

00

400

,000

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

ns o

f Sy

rians

MoN

E,

AFAD

6,65

0,00

06,

650,

000

55

5

1.5

Out

-of-s

choo

l Syr

i-an

refu

gee

and

Turk

ish

child

ren

and

yout

h ha

ve

acce

ss to

pro

gram

mes

th

at fa

cilit

ate

rein

te-

grat

ion

in th

e fo

rmal

ed

ucat

ion

syst

em a

nd

or p

rom

ote

life

skills

.

# of

refu

gee

chil -

dren

par

ticip

at-

ing

in in

form

al

and

nonf

orm

al

educ

atio

n pr

ogra

mm

es to

su

ppor

t rei

nte-

grat

ion

in th

e fo

rmal

edu

catio

n sy

stem

NG

O a

nd M

ON

E re

ports

# of

ch

ildre

n 2

,500

5

0,00

0 5

,000

5

7,50

0

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

ns o

f Sy

rians

MoN

E,

AFAD

, N

GO

s15

,600

,000

15,6

00,0

005

55

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

Ensu

re s

usta

ined

acc

ess

to fo

rmal

, non

-form

al a

nd in

form

al e

duca

tion

prog

ram

mes

for r

efug

ee c

hild

ren,

you

th a

nd

adul

ts in

cam

ps a

nd u

rban

are

as th

at a

re in

clus

ive

and

prom

ote

life-

long

lear

ning

.Q

1: C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t?Q

2: S

usta

inab

le

bene

fits?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

IN

DIC

AT

OR

# of

boy

s, g

irls,

men

and

w

omen

enr

olle

d in

edu

catio

nal

prog

ram

mes

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

:

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

Enro

lmen

t dat

a pr

ovid

ed b

y go

vern

men

t and

pa

rtne

rs

SE

CT

OR

RE

SP

ON

SE

OV

ER

VIE

W T

AB

LE

48

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

1.7

You

ng S

yria

n re

f-ug

ee m

en a

nd w

om-

en h

ave

incr

ease

d ac

cess

to v

ocat

iona

l an

d hi

gher

edu

catio

n pr

ogra

mm

es

# of

per

sons

pa

rtici

patin

g in

voc

atio

nal

train

ing

pro -

gram

mes

AFAD

and

M

oNE

parti

cipa

tion

data

# of

pe

rson

s en

rolle

d 4

,000

2

,000

5

00

6,5

00

Nat

ionw

ide

MoN

E,

AFAD

2,82

0,00

0 2

,820

,000

5

55

# of

per

sons

aw

arde

d hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion

scho

lars

hips

YTB

and

UN

HC

R D

AFI p

artic

i -pa

tion

data

# of

stu

-de

nts

100

1

50

250

1.9

Ref

ugee

ch

ildre

n, y

outh

an

d ad

ults

hav

e ac

cess

to fo

rmal

and

no

n-fo

rmal

lang

uage

tra

inin

g pr

ogra

mm

es

that

dev

elop

Tur

kish

pr

ofic

ienc

y, s

uppo

rt th

e m

aint

enan

ce o

f ac

adem

ic p

rofic

ienc

y in

Ara

bic

and

may

fa

cilit

ate

acqu

isiti

on

of o

ther

lang

uage

s.

# of

Syr

ian

boys

, girl

s,

men

and

w

omen

w

ho a

re

parti

cipa

ting

in la

ngua

ge

pro -

gram

mes

.

MO

NE

and

NG

O re

ports

# of

pe

rson

s 1

00,0

00

300

,000

1

,000

1

,000

4

02,0

00

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

ns o

f Sy

rians

MoN

E,

AFAD

,N-

GO

s, Y

TB

and

othe

rs

11,4

50,0

0011

,450

,000

55

5

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

43,

270,

000

43,

270,

000

49


EDUCATION

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

ID-

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I -TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

1.2

Sta

te s

choo

ls

and

TEC

s in

are

as

with

hig

h co

ncen

tra-

tion

of S

yria

ns a

re

cons

truct

ed a

nd/o

r fin

anci

ally

sup

port -

ed to

ope

rate

the

scho

ols

# of

sch

ools

ho

stin

g re

fuge

es

that

are

co

nstru

cted

or

whe

re

runn

ing

cost

s ar

e su

ppor

ted

MO

NE

and

AFAD

en

gine

erin

g re

ports

; fin

anci

al

repo

rts

# of

sc

hool

s -

2

51,5

00

1,8

00

180

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

ns o

f Sy

rians

MoN

E,

AFAD

21,1

00,0

0021

,100

,000

55

5

1.4

Res

pons

ible

en

titie

s at

nat

iona

l an

d pr

ovin

cial

le

vel s

uppo

rted

in

effe

ctiv

e pl

anni

ng,

info

rmat

ion

man

age-

men

t and

co-

ordi

na-

tion

of th

e ed

ucat

ion

sect

or re

spon

se, a

s re

ques

ted

# of

st

uden

ts

who

se d

ata

is re

cord

ed

in Y

OBI

S

YOBI

S da

ta#

of s

tu-

dent

s 1

00,0

00

300

,000

4

00,0

00

Nat

ionw

ide

MO

NE

450,

000

450,

000

54

5

1.6

Cap

acity

of

natio

nal i

nstit

utio

ns

offe

ring

voca

tiona

l, sk

ills a

nd T

urki

sh

lang

auge

trai

ning

to

you

th a

nd a

dults

st

reng

then

ed

# of

per

sons

pa

rtici

patin

g in

cou

rses

of

fere

d by

Pub

lic

Educ

atio

n C

entre

s

MO

NE

reco

rds

# of

pe

rson

s50

0015

000

8000

28,0

00na

tionw

ide

MoN

E1,

700,

000

1,00

0,00

05

45

1.8

Cap

acity

of

educ

atio

n in

stitu

tions

to

pro

vide

incl

usiv

e ed

ucat

ion

and

soci

al in

tera

ctio

n op

portu

nitie

s to

bo

th S

yria

n re

fuge

e an

d Tu

rkis

h ch

ildre

n st

reng

then

ed

# of

teac

h -er

s an

d ed

ucat

ion

offic

ials

tra

ined

on

incl

usiv

e ed

ucat

ion

and

soci

al

cohe

sion

Trai

ning

At

tend

ance

Re

ports

# of

te

ach -

ers

and

edu-

catio

n of

ficia

ls

-

350

4

50

-

800

na

tionw

ide

MoN

E1,

100,

000

1,10

0,00

05

55

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

24,

350,

000

23,

650,

000

50

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DIV

IDU

ALS

) IN

201

6

TOTA

L TA

RG

ET -

ED

LOC

ATI

ON

PA

RTN

ER

S

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R L

IV-

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IM-

PA

CTE

D

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

2.1

Qua

lity

of e

duca

tion

serv

ices

pro

mot

ed

thro

ugh

the

prov

isio

n of

te

achi

ng a

nd le

arni

ng

supp

ort m

ater

ials

in

sch

ools

and

the

crea

tion

of s

afe,

sec

ure

and

incl

usiv

e le

arni

ng

envi

ronm

ents

.

# of

sch

ool p

ro-

vide

d w

ith te

ach-

ing

mat

eria

ls

Dis

tribu

tion

reco

rds

# of

sc

hool

s 2

5 1

50

175

Nat

ionw

ide

MoN

E,

AFAD

, N

GO

s12

,390

,000

12,3

90,0

00#

of c

hild

ren

prov

ided

with

le

arni

ng s

uppo

rt m

ater

ials

Dis

tribu

tion

reco

rds

# of

ch

ildre

n 8

0,00

0 2

45,0

00

70,

000

5,0

00

400

,000

2.3

Tea

cher

s of

Syr

ian

refu

gee

child

ren

have

ac

cess

to re

leva

nt a

nd

appr

opria

te p

rofe

ssio

nal

deve

lopm

ent o

ppor

tuni

-tie

s an

d re

late

d su

ppor

t se

rvic

es.

# of

vol

unte

er

teac

hers

trai

ned

Trai

ning

At

tend

ance

Re

ports

# of

te

ach -

ers

2,0

00

8,0

00

10,

000

Nat

iona

l

MoN

E,

AFAD

, PTT

, N

GO

S an

d ot

hers

32,0

80,0

0032

,080

,000

# of

vol

un-

teer

teac

hers

re

ceiv

ing

regu

lar

ince

ntiv

es

PTT

and

MO

NE

repo

rts

# of

te

ach-

ers

2,0

00

8,0

00

1

0,00

0

2.5

Ref

ugee

chi

ldre

n an

d te

ache

rs h

ave

incr

ease

d ac

cess

to

psyc

ho-s

ocia

l sup

port

serv

ices

offe

red

thro

ugh

scho

ols

and

tem

pora

ry

educ

atio

n ce

ntre

s

# of

teac

hers

tra

ined

on

psy-

cho-

soci

al s

up-

port

and

refe

rral

mec

hani

sms

Trai

ning

At

tend

ance

Re

ports

# of

te

ach-

ers

1,0

00

2,5

00

3,5

00

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

ns o

f Sy

rians

MoN

E,

AFAD

and

O

ther

s1,

350,

000

1,35

0,00

0

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

45,

820,

000

45,

820,

000

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

Incr

ease

the

qual

ity o

f edu

catio

n fo

r Syr

ian

refu

gee

child

ren

and

yout

h in

pro

tect

ive

lear

ning

env

ironm

ents

, in

cam

ps a

nd

host

com

mun

ities

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% a

nd #

of c

hild

ren

enro

lled

rece

ivin

g re

port

car

ds a

t the

en

d of

the

scho

ol y

ear 1

00,0

00

child

ren

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

100,

000

ch

ildre

n

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

:

400,

000

child

ren

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

YOB

IS d

ata

51


EDUCATION

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I -TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI -

TY?

2.2

Sta

te in

stitu

tions

ar

e su

ppor

ted

to

ensu

re p

rovi

sion

of

lang

uage

and

cu

rricu

lar s

uppo

rt th

at fa

cilit

ates

the

incl

usio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gee

child

ren

in

the

natio

nal e

duca

-tio

n sy

stem

# of

chi

ldre

n be

nefit

-in

g fro

m

lang

uage

te

achi

ng

mat

eria

ls

MO

NE

repo

rts#

of

child

ren

- 1

00,0

00

--

100

,000

na

tionw

ide

MoN

E, N

GO

s an

d O

ther

s1,

000,

000

1,00

0,00

0

2.4

Tea

cher

s in

St

ate

scho

ols

train

ed

to e

ffect

ivel

y su

ppor

t th

e ac

adem

ic,

lingu

istic

and

psy

-ch

o-so

cial

nee

ds o

f re

fuge

e ch

ildre

n an

d to

redu

ce le

vels

of

bully

ing

and

tens

ion

in s

choo

ls.

# of

teac

h-er

s tra

ined

Trai

ning

pa

rtici

patio

n re

cord

s

# of

te

ach -

ers

- 3

0,00

0 2

6,00

0 -

56,

000

natio

nwid

eM

oNE

and

othe

rs1,

400,

000

1,40

0,00

0

2.6

Ski

lls tr

aini

ng

prog

ram

mes

are

m

ore

resp

onsi

ve to

ne

eds

in a

reas

hos

t-in

g la

rge

num

bers

of

refu

gees

# of

cou

rses

de

velo

ped

Indi

cate

w

hat w

ill be

th

e m

eans

of

ver

ifica

-tio

n fo

r thi

s in

dica

tor

prog

ress

# of

co

urse

s-

--

- 1

2

Hig

hest

m

ost

logi

cal g

e -og

raph

ical

gr

oupi

ng

Inse

rt al

l pa

rtner

s w

orki

ng o

n th

is o

utpu

t.

Inse

rt a

sep -

arat

e lin

e fo

r G

over

nmen

t re

quire

men

ts

1,00

0,00

01,

000,

000

2.7

The

edu

catio

nal

atta

inm

ent o

f ref

ugee

ch

ildre

n an

d yo

uth

is

mon

itore

d, c

ertif

ied,

do

cum

ente

d an

d re

cogn

ized

by

rele

-va

nt a

utho

ritie

s.

# of

Syr

ian

refu

gee

stud

ents

re

ceiv

ing

repo

rt ca

rds

at th

e en

d of

th

e ac

adem

-ic

yea

r

YOBI

S da

ta#

chil-

dren

20

0,00

0 2

00,0

00

-

1,0

00

401

,000

N

atio

nwid

e

MoN

E,

UN

ICEF

, U

NH

CR,

AF

AD

575,

000

575,

000

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

3,9

75,0

00

3,9

75,0

00

52

EDUCATION



COMPONENT 2016

REQUIREMENTS (USD) RESILIENCE COMPONENT

2016

TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (USD) FOR 2016

UNHCR 15,070,000 7,175,000 22,245,000

UNICEF 71,320,000 21,150,000 92,470,000

IOM 2,700,000 2,700,000

TOTAL 89,090,000 28,325,000 117,415,000

53


Lead Agencies WHO, UNHCR

Partners IOM, UNFPA, UNICEF and other partners

Objectives

1. Coordination for essential health response strengthening and streamlining of decision making in partnership with authorities and other actors

2. Continuation and strengthening of essential health care services (including medication for chronic diseases) for Syrian refugees

3. Strengthening communicable diseases surveillance, detection and response, including immunization

4. Strengthening capacity of health service delivery, health promotion and protection interventions, including SRH SGBV services and nutrition

5. Increasing access to mental health services through improved quality

GENDER MARKER 1


US$ 19,896,400


US$ 9,310,000


US$ 29,206,400

HEALTHSECTOR RESPONSE

HEALTH

1,046,366

10

19

8

7

7

7

2,500,000

30

500

20

20

10

4

%0 %20 %40 %60 %80 %100

# of PHC consultations

# of public and private health facilities supported

# of service providers attending MHPSS trainings

# of partner health care services to Syrian Refugees (MoHapproved OPD clinics)

Increased delivery capacity of National PHC facilities inimpected communities

# of community centers or counseling units supported orstrengthened to provide SGBV/RH counseling and response…

# of capacity building activities and training sessions conductedon SRH/SGBV response


SECTOR ACHIEVEMENTS (OCTOBER 2015)

54

The overall health response is strongly led by the Government of Turkey. Under the Temporary Protection Regulation, Syrian refugees are provided with the same health care services as Turkish nationals, whilst health insurance is also being covered by the Government. The 3RP Health sector partners aim to strengthen the existing national health system in order for it to accommodate the additional case load and needs of the two million Syrian refugees residing in Turkey, and undertake an information and communication campaign to raise awareness among Syrians on how to access health care in the country.

The Ministry of Health (MoH) has made significant efforts to provide refugees residing in camps with free access to health services. Registered Syrian refugees in the community (who therefore benefit from the Temporary Protection Regulation) also receive free health care in all provinces of Turkey. Emergency health care is provided to both registered and unregistered Syrians.

CURRENT SITUATION

Continuous arrivals of refugees in 2015 increased the gap between the demands for health services and the capacity of the national health infrastructure to respond. Polyclinics and hospitals have reported an additional patient load of 30 to 40 per cent in 2015. Local hospitals have been enlarged and equipped to cover the most acute needs. Because of the high demand in some locations hosting large numbers of Syrians, the time allocated to patients is too short to ensure the quality of service.

Of the total Syrian population in Turkey, 25 per cent are women at reproductive age and 4 per cent are pregnant/childbearing women. Some 15 per cent of deliveries require high-risk emergency interventions. Syrian refugees, especially those living in host communities are increasingly exposed to vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles and pertussis. There are also concerns regarding the increasing mental health and psychological problems of Syrian refugees. There are large numbers of

patients from conflict areas who are severely injured and require surgery and intensive care, and their long-term post-operative rehabilitation requires a huge amount of human and financial resources.

Little data on the nutritional condition of Syrian children living in Turkey is available. Many Syrian families living outside of the camps struggle to meet their basic nutritional needs. Infant and young child feeding practices are of concern, particularly low rates of exclusive breast-feeding before six months by Syrian women, which can have an impact on child health and nutritional status.

There are different interpretations and practices in the implementation of the Temporary Protection Regulation from province to province, resulting in inconsistencies in the practice of health service provisions. The language barrier, the high mobility of the population, and the lack of information regarding availability and accessibility further hinder Syrians access to health services.

©UNFPA

55


HEALTH



Population In Need




Men 68,400 68,400 68,400 34,200

Women 69,000 69,000 69,000 34,500

Boys 84,000 84,000 84,000 42,000

Girls 78,600 78,600 78,600 39,300

Sub Total 300,000 300,000 300,000 150,000


Men 558,600 186,200 558,600 111,720

Women 563,500 187,833 563,500 112,700

Boys 686,000 228,667 686,000 137,200

Girls 641,900 213,967 641,900 128,380

Sub Total 2,450,000 816,667 2,450,000 490,000


Men - 139,540 - 197,128

Women - 135,999 - 192,125

Boys - 64,461 - 91,063

Girls - 60,000 - 84,762

Sub Total 8,200,000 400,000 8,200,000 565,078

Grand Total 10,950,000 1,516,667 10,950,000 1,205,078

The MoH and Health sector partners have identified three main challenges in health care service delivery for Syrian refugees: lack of registration; language barriers; and lack of information about the health care services available and how to access them. A health assessment was conducted to assess access to health services, health needs, and immunization coverage among non-camp Syrian refugees in Turkey. Mental health and immunization assessments have been

coordinated with the MoH and will be conducted in the last quarter of 2015. These assessments are expected to highlight the key challenges and provide information and recommendations to improve health service provision to Syrian refugees in general and immunization, in particular, for children. In addition, Health sector partners are advocating for more active information sharing and coordination between the national health institutions and aid

agencies, to enable gaps to be identified and synergy of interventions. An increased level of funding is needed for public administration to take necessary measures to overcome the language barrier and the lack of information among the refugee communities. In addition, health sector partners endeavour to address these issues more effectively through supporting to MoH in establishing mobile health centres and conduct information campaign to refugees.

56

STRATEGIC VISION & RESPONSE PLANThe response of the Health sector partners is formulated on the assumption that the number of non-camp Syrian refugees will remain stable, while resources will continue to diminish in 2016/2017. For this reason, the provision of primary health care for both refugees and the host community will need to be strongly addressed through both short-term interventions targeting primarily Syrian refugees, and medium to longer-term interventions aimed at increasing the capacities of the Government health care system. Within its legal framework, the MoH increasingly approve the participation of Health sector partners in health service provision. The Directive on ‘Principles of Health Services for Persons under Temporary Protection’ of MoH entered into force on 28 March 2015. The Directive regulates the referral steps; defines the health institutions that can provide services; sets forth the principles for opening of health institutions by associations or foundations, and

outlines the procedural issues related to employment of personnel working at these institutions. Articles 10-14 regulate the procedures and principles for ‘voluntary health services’ to be established by foundations and associations. The initial permission for such institutions is granted for six months, to be renewed for another six months, after which an evaluation is conducted on the continued need and the standards. The procedures for recruitment of personnel are outlined in the Directive. Accordingly, partners have established 16 temporary health centres (THC) for refugees in southeast Turkey to date. This number is expected to increase to 25-30. As the situation for Syrians living in Turkey becomes more protracted, and with even more arrivals expected in the coming year, higher levels of funding are required to enable the sector to respond effectively.

In 2016, the Health sector will continue to support the MoH and the Ministry of Family

and Social Policies in strengthening the health service delivery capacity for Syrian refugees and host communities, and to strengthen secondary and tertiary care to respond to the needs of the growing population in Turkey. The focus will be on primary health care provision to reduce the patient load on secondary and tertiary healthcare and the respective costs. Specifically, the MoH will be supported in developing a comprehensive mid-term health care strategy which addresses health issues related to non-camp refugees and the impacted communities. Health sector partners will support the MoH to integrate Syrian health professionals into Turkish health system which will make positive steps in addressing the language barrier for Syrian patients. The role of the family, community health centres, and THCs as the primary care providers for Syrian refugees will be strengthened to improve primary health care, including mental health care, and to reduce the burden on hospitals, which


57


HEALTH

currently serve as the entry point for most refugees. Measures will also include the expansion of the existing health information system to register and record data on Syrian refugees, to enable better planning. Advocacy efforts will continue to encourage more health partners to provide health and mental care for refugees, and for the temporary inclusion of Syrian health professionals in service provision.

A specific focus will be placed on reproductive health care as a core intervention by the humanitarian community to support primary health care

to ensure that sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs are met. In addition, the risks and causes of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity will be addressed, including safe delivery, neonatal care, unwanted pregnancy, sexual violence and exploitation, and other reproductive health-related conditions. Capacity building of Government and NGO partners on SRH and sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) will be supported. A national SRH group will be established and a national action plan on SRH emergency preparedness will be developed and expected to be included into the National Contingency Plan.

Information materials in Arabic on health issues, access to health services, vaccination schedules, reproductive health, and communicable and non-communicable disease risks and prevention will continue to be developed in 2016. Establishing women and girls safe spaces (WGSS) will be the entry point for the provision of SRH and SGBV services, which will be expanded through partners. Additionally, SMS texts will be used and a hotline will be established to strengthen information outreach to Syrians.

©UNHCR / S. Malkawi

58

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

Coo

rdin

atio

n fo

r ess

entia

l hea

lth re

spon

se s

treng

then

ing

and

stre

amlin

ing

of d

ecis

ion

mak

ing

in p

artn

ersh

ip w

ith

auth

oriti

es a

nd o

ther

act

ors

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

IN

DIC

AT

OR

# of

join

t act

iviti

es (A

sses

smen

ts,

cont

inge

ncy

plan

s, s

trate

gic

docu

men

ts e

tc.)

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

0O

BJE

CT

IVE

IN

DIC

AT

OR

T

AR

GE

T:

10M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Join

t rep

orts

and

do

cum

ents

with

M

oH4

44

SE

CT

OR

RE

SP

ON

SE

OV

ER

VIE

W T

AB

LE

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I -TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI -

TY?

Out

put 1

.1 T

he

heal

th c

are

prov

isio

n st

rate

gy is

ad-

just

ed a

ccor

ding

to

the

evol

ving

ci

rcum

stan

ces

of a

pr

otra

cted

cris

is.

# of

Joi

nt

high

leve

l m

eetin

gs

with

GoT

, U

N o

rgan

-iz

atio

ns,

priv

ate

sect

or a

nd

NG

Os

Mee

ting

min

utes

/ re

ports

Coo

rdi -

nate

d ac

tivi-

ties

--

--

12

Anka

ra,

ista

nbul

, iz

mir,

Bur

sa,

Kony

a,

Gaz

inte

p,

Hat

ay, K

ilis,

sanl

ıurfa

, Ad

ana,

M

ersi

n,

Mar

din

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

400

,000

0

44

4

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

400

,000

-

59


HEALTHB

. RE

SIL

IEN

CE

CO

MP

ON

EN

T

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 1

.2 S

trate

gic

deci

sion

mak

ing

is in

form

ed a

nd

coor

dina

ted

# of

Mee

t -in

gs h

eld

with

the

invo

lvem

ent

of M

oH a

t na

tiona

l and

pr

ovin

cial

le

vels

Mee

ting

min

utes

/ re

ports

of

UN

age

ncie

s

Coo

rdi -

natio

n m

eet-

ings

--

--

12

Anka

ra,

Ista

nbul

, Iz

mir,

Bur

-sa

, Kon

ya,

Gaz

inte

p,

Hat

ay, K

ilis,

Sanl

ıurfa

, Ad

ana,

M

ersi

n,

Mar

din

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

440

,000

0

44

4

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

440

,000

-

60

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

Con

tinua

tion

and

stre

ngth

enin

g of

ess

entia

l hea

lth c

are

serv

ices

(inc

ludi

ng m

edic

atio

n fo

r chr

onic

dis

ease

s) fo

r Syr

ian

refu

gees

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% c

hang

e of

con

sulta

tions

re

ceiv

ed b

y Sy

rian

refu

gees

in

prim

ary

heal

th c

are

serv

ices

in

2016

as

com

pare

d to

201

5

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

0

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

:

20%

in

crea

se

in p

rimar

y ca

re

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

Hea

lth re

gist

ries

of M

oH a

nd

NG

Os

faci

litie

s4

44

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 2

.1 E

ssen

tial

prim

ary

heal

th c

are

serv

ices

(with

focu

s on

MC

H/S

RH) a

re

supp

orte

d an

d ac

-ce

ssib

le to

refu

gees

.

# of

co

nulta

tions

re

ceiv

ed b

y re

fuge

es

and

im-

pact

ed h

ost

com

mun

ities

in

prim

ary

heal

th

thro

ugh

20 P

HC

un

its in

five

pr

ovin

ces

Regi

strie

s of

PH

C

units

in fi

ve

prov

ince

s

num

ber

50,0

0060

,000

40,0

0015

0,00

0

Sanl

iurfa

, G

azia

ntep

, H

atay

(tw

o m

ore

will

be

sele

cted

)

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

13,

396,

400

04

44

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

13,

396,

400

-

61


HEALTH

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I -TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 2

.2 C

ontin

-ue

d an

d st

reng

eth-

ened

sup

port

to

natio

nal i

nsitu

tions

to

pro

vide

targ

eted

as

sist

ance

and

su

ppor

t to

the

mos

t vu

lner

able

refu

gees

an

d ho

st c

omm

unity

pr

ovis

ion

of b

asic

eq

uipm

ent s

uppl

ies

incl

udin

g la

b

# of

pub

lic

and

priv

ate

faci

lties

su

ppor

ted

Proj

ect

prog

ress

re

ports

# of

fa

cilit

es34

Anka

ra,

Ista

nbul

, Iz

mir,

Bur

-sa

, Kon

ya,

Gaz

inte

p,

Hat

ay, K

ilis,

Sanl

ıurfa

, Ad

ana,

M

ersi

n,

Mar

din

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

7,6

00,0

00

04

44

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

7,6

00,0

00

-

62

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

Stre

ngth

enin

g co

mm

unic

able

dis

ease

s su

rvei

llanc

e, d

etec

tion

and

resp

onse

, inc

ludi

ng im

mun

izat

ion.

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f Syr

ian

refu

gees

chi

ldre

n un

der 5

yea

rs re

ceiv

ed ro

utin

e va

ccin

atio

n. A

nd A

FP c

ase

dete

ntio

n ra

te

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

0

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

:

90%

co

vera

ge;

2.0

AFP

de

tect

ion

rate

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

Vacc

inat

ion

Ass

essm

ent

by W

HO

in

2015

and

201

6,

surv

eilla

nce

data

44

4

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 3

.1 I

n -cr

ease

d ac

cess

to

prev

entiv

e m

easu

res

of c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es, i

nclu

ding

aw

aren

ess

and

im-

mun

isat

ion

serv

ices

# of

Syr

ian

child

ren

at

imm

unis

a -tio

n ag

e im

mun

ised

ac

cord

ing

to

the

Turk

ish

imm

u -ni

satio

n sc

hedu

le

mea

sure

d by

sur

veys

(e

nd o

f 201

5 an

d en

d of

20

16)

Num

-be

r of

child

ren

unde

r 5

32,5

8719

3,06

9-

-22

5,65

6

Anka

ra,

Ista

nbul

, Iz

mir,

Bur

-sa

, Kon

ya,

Gaz

inte

p,

Hat

ay, K

ilis,

Sanl

ıurfa

, Ad

ana,

M

ersi

n,

Mar

din

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

300

,000

0

44

4

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

300

,000

-

63


HEALTHB

. RE

SIL

IEN

CE

CO

MP

ON

EN

T

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI -

TY?

Out

put 3

.2 P

rimar

y an

d pu

blic

hea

lth

care

cap

acity

to p

re-

vent

com

mun

icab

le

dise

ases

incl

udin

g ve

ctor

-bor

ne d

isea

s-es

stre

ngth

ened

Prop

ortio

n of

out

brea

ks

in re

fuge

es

and

surro

undi

ng

com

mun

ity

dete

cted

an

d re

-sp

onde

d to

w

ithin

72

h

Activ

ity

repo

rts

# of

pr

ovin

c -es

9090

90-

90

Anka

ra,

ista

nbul

, iz

mir,

Bur

-sa

, Kon

ya,

Gaz

inte

p,

Hat

ay, K

ilis,

Sanl

ıurfa

, Ad

ana,

M

ersi

n,

Mar

din

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

450

,000

0

55

5

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

450

,000

-

64

OB

JEC

TIV

E 4

Stre

ngth

en c

apac

ity o

f hea

lth s

ervi

ce d

eliv

ery,

hea

lth p

rom

otio

n an

d pr

otec

tion

inte

rven

tions

, inc

ludi

ng S

RH

, SG

BV

serv

ices

and

nut

ritio

nQ

1: C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t?Q

2: S

usta

inab

le

bene

fits?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 4

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f wom

en a

nd c

hild

ren

in c

omm

uniti

es w

ith a

hig

h pe

rcen

tage

of r

efug

ees

rece

ive

targ

eted

inte

rven

tions

(hea

lth

prom

otio

n, p

rote

ctio

n in

form

atio

n in

rele

vant

lang

uage

s)

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

0O

BJE

CT

IVE

IN

DIC

AT

OR

T

AR

GE

T:

50%

ME

AN

S O

F

VE

RIF

ICA

-T

ION

MoH

hea

lth

regi

strie

s-

--

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TA-

BIL

ITY

?

Out

put 4

.1 M

CH

, se

xual

and

repr

o-du

ctiv

e he

alth

car

e,

incl

udin

g ob

stet

ric

care

and

fam

ily

plan

ning

ser

vice

s an

d SG

BV re

spon

se

are

acce

ssib

le to

re

fuge

es th

roug

h he

alth

pro

mot

ion.

# of

com

mu-

nity

cen

ters

su

ppor

ted

to p

rovi

de

heal

th a

nd

nutri

tion

serv

ices

to

vuln

arab

le

refu

gees

offic

ial

reco

rds

regi

s -te

red/

offic

ial

cent

ers

sup -

porte

d

2510

1045

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

gee

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

4,35

0,00

00

34

4

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

4,3

50,0

00

-

65


HEALTH

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put4

.2 C

apac

ity

of h

ealth

aut

horit

ies

and

partn

ers

on p

ro-

mot

ion

of M

CH

, nu-

tritio

n, re

prod

uctiv

e he

alth

car

e se

rvic

es

and

SGBV

resp

onse

st

reng

then

ed.

# of

peo

ple

train

ed

Num

ber o

f ac

tivity

/trai

n -in

g re

port

num

-be

r of

even

ts50

150

150

350

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

gee

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

Inse

rt al

l pa

rtner

s w

orki

ng o

n th

is o

utpu

t.

Inse

rt a

sepa

rate

lin

e fo

r G

over

nmen

t re

quire

-m

ents

340,

000

04

44

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

340

,000

-

66

OB

JEC

TIV

E 5

Incr

easi

ng a

cces

s to

men

tal h

ealth

ser

vice

s th

roug

h im

prov

ed q

ualit

yQ

1: C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t?Q

2: S

usta

inab

le

bene

fits?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 5

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f Syr

ian

refu

gees

rece

ivin

g m

enta

l hea

lth s

ervi

ces

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

0

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 50

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Reg

istri

es o

f M

oH a

nd N

GO

44

4

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 5

.1 M

enta

l he

alth

ser

vice

s ar

e ac

cess

ible

to

refu

gees

# of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

re

ceiv

ed

men

tal

heal

th /

PSS

serv

ices

Partn

ers

repo

rts

Num

-be

r of

Syria

ns

refu

-ge

es

130,

349

96,5

35-

-22

6,88

4

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

gee

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

1,45

0,00

00

44

4

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

1,4

50,0

00

-

67


HEALTH

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI -

TY?

Out

put 5

.2: C

apac

ity

of c

omm

unity

, men

tal

heal

th a

nd p

sych

o-so

cial

ser

vice

pro

-vi

ders

and

par

tner

s st

reng

then

ed.

# of

peo

ple

train

ed o

n ps

ycho

so-

cial

sup

port

serv

ices

in

clud

ing

refe

rral

Num

ber o

f ac

tivity

/trai

n -in

g re

port

num

-be

r of

even

ts25

100

--

50

Prov

ince

s w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

gee

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

WH

O,

UN

ICEF

, U

NFP

A,

IOM

, UN

-H

CR

480,

000

04

44

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

480

,000

-

68

HEALTH



COMPONENT 2016REQUIREMENTS (USD) RE-

SILIENCE COMPONENT 2016TOTAL REQUIREMENTS

(USD) FOR 2016

WHO 4,100,000 1,325,000 5,425,000

IOM 2,260,000 120,000 2,380,000

UNICEF 3,000,000 250,000 3,250,000

UNFPA 3,286,400 1,290,000 4,576,400

UNHCR 7,250,000 6,325,000 13,575,000

TOTAL 19,896,400 9,310,000 29,206,400

69


Lead Agencies UNHCR

Partners IOM, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF

Objectives

1. Adequate shelter solutions continue to be available in camp and to most vulnerable population in urban areas

2. Targeted populations have continued and equitable support to meet their needs for basic and domestic items

3. Targeted populations live in satisfactory conditions of sanitation and hygiene

GENDER MARKER 0


US$ 170,875,700


US$ 50,700,000


US$ 221,575,700

BASIC NEEDSSECTOR RESPONSE

BASIC NEEDS

45,060

4,575

11,832

74,436

12,320

244,679

9,002

746

65,000

18,000

57,500

95,000

20,000

1,155,000

57,500

640

%0 %20 %40 %60 %80 %100

# of HH supported with NFIs

# of vulnerable families receiving support for their basic needs(non-cash)

# of HH supported with one time, short term or regular financialassistance

# of HH receiving winterization supplies

# of HH supported with shelter solutions

# of hygiene kits provided to refugees and members ofimpacted communities

# of HH receiving cash assistance for support to hygiene

# of sanitary facilities constructed or improved



70

Turkey is committed to streamlining assistance to Syrian refugees through existing national institutions, and demonstrates a high level of ownership in providing protection and emergency response to more than two million refugees, with about 12% (260,000 Syrians) residing in 23 refugee camps and 88% (1,740,000 Syrians) living in host communities.

During the sudden influx of Syrian’s at the Akcakale border in June 2015, Turkey activated a robust emergency response mechanism. The Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) was able to mobilise a vast amount of core relief items for new arrivals, and 3RP partners supplemented its effort. Following this emergency, several 3RP partners have created, and are maintaining an emergency stock of tents, food and non-food items, medicines, and equipment for potential influxes of people, and the inter-agency contingency plan process

CURRENT SITUATION provides regular review and coordination on the stockpiles.

With regard to assisting Syrian refugees who are already in Turkey, the Government plays a lead role in the response. While the assistance of 3RP partners to camp refugees is more systematically organised in partnership with AFAD and the Turkish Red Crescent (TRC), the identification of the needs among Syrians in the host communities remains the biggest challenge facing the sector partners. In addition, as more aid agencies are working in the provision of assistance, it is becoming crucial for effective coordination and harmonisation of standards between organisations.

Many Syrian refugees arrive in a desperate condition to Turkey, their personal belongings, if any, minimal and very basic. As the access to labour market is delayed and pending the issuance of

a secondary regulation, many refugees are engaged in informal employment, and often subject to exploitation, discrimination and harassment. Child labour is a common phenomenon as there is a need for children to support their family. As a result, the Syrian refugee population is becoming progressively destitute after five years of displacement in Turkey.

As long as refugees cannot become self-reliant in Turkey, they will continue to depend on the assistance of national institutions and aid agencies. It should be noted that the distribution of core relief items, cash-based interventions, and the delivery of basic services cannot be achieved by one intervention. The recurring nature of the needs in this sector underlines the importance of continued funding to ensure the survival of the most vulnerable families and stabilise the population movement from Turkey.


71


BASIC NEEDS



Population In Need




Men 68,400 50,160 68,400 84,000

Women 69,000 50,600 69,000 78,600

Boys 84,000 61,600 84,000 68,400

Girls 78,600 57,640 78,600 69,000

Sub Total 300,000 220,000 300,000 300,000


Men 558,600 346,560 558,600 24,625

Women 563,500 349,600 563,500 24,725

Boys 686,000 425,600 686,000 30,100

Girls 641,900 398,240 641,900 28,050

Sub Total 2,450,000 1,520,000 2,450,000 107,500


Men - - - -

Women - - - -

Boys - - - -

Girls - - - -

Sub Total 8,200,000 200,000 8,200,000 500,000

Grand Total 10,950,000 1,940,000 10,950,000 907,500

Syrian refugees living in urban and peri-urban setting have great difficulty meeting basic domestic needs, given their minimal financial means and the high cost of living for food, accommodation, water, electricity, gas and heating fuel costs. Nor do the international humanitarian community have the means to cover the basic needs of all persons of concern residing in Turkey. This assistance can only be offered to the extremely vulnerable.

In Turkey, it is only the Turkish authorities responsible for registration of Syrian refugees, to which the 3RP partners do not have access. Lack of registration data presents challenges in the identification of persons in need of assistance. While camp-based refugees benefit from all

©UNICEF / Ayberk Yurts

72

STRATEGIC VISION & RESPONSE PLAN

essential services which are provided in the camps, those refugees and asylum seekers living in urban, peri-urban and rural areas experience greater difficulties in satisfying their basic needs.

Support the municipalities in delivering basic services is also identified as a priority, in particular those causing increased risk of public health such as waste management.

In the absence of vulnerability data, the identification of beneficiaries living in urban, peri-urban and rural areas and the distribution of both cash-based assistance and non-food items will be managed in coordination with national and local institutions. An integral part of the resilience strategy will be to expand the capacity of central and local social safety nets for the identification of needs and vulnerabilities, and improve outreach activities in order to identify vulnerable refugees in the community.

The coordination with local and central authorities and the partners will also reduce duplication. The 3W (Who, What, Where) mapping will be strengthened and updated on a regular basis. Additionally, the criteria for vulnerabilities, targeting

and distribution mechanisms, and the value of assistance needs to be aligned where possible, to achieve equitable assistance for refugees and avoid inconsistencies in different locations and amongst partners.

Basic Needs and Essential Service Sector has had two-pronged approach: firstly, supporting the emergency preparedness and response to new arrivals; secondly, supporting vulnerable Syrian families already living in Turkey and national capacities delivering services to impacted communities. The response to the Syrian crisis is transforming from an emergency response, to now addressing both the immediate needs and formulating a medium and long-term strategy to increase the resilience of the population. This transition will be materialized through strengthened support to national institutions in the delivery of services and assistances.

In the Basic Needs and Essential Services sector, 3RP partners are supporting the authorities to meet the most pressing needs, which includes a combination of multi-purpose cash-based interventions, the distribution of non-food items, as well as shelter and WASH assistance to the refugees in camps and in the community.

Cash-based interventions can also be used to support refugees in renting accommodation for themselves.

At all levels, the response strategy will be guided by principles to strengthen the overall protection environment for the affected population, including men, women, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities.In 2016, different modalities will be used for supporting the persons of concern, including in-kind distribution, cash, and voucher assistance. The assistance modality will focus more on cash-based interventions whenever possible for refugees in the community. The provision of non-food items will be prioritized for new arrivals, camp residents and the most vulnerable refugees in the community, or where cash schemes are not able to be implemented due to operational constraints.

The shelter and WASH strategy will support the Government in maintaining

proper conditions of, and access to, sanitation and hygiene facilities and services in camps, and in municipalities hosting large numbers of refugees. In addition, ensuring secure access and use of sanitation facilities for refugee women in the camps is an important protection activity to mitigate the risk of SGBV. While the provision of hygiene kits will address the short term needs of the refugees, hygiene promotion activities will increase the capacity of the refugee community to better cope with the living conditions caused by their displacement.

The urban outreach activities will focus on improving the capacity of local authorities to respond to the needs of a dispersed population, simultaneously serving both the immediate well-being of refugees, and also host communities. Implementation of multi-purpose cash interventions positively impact other sectors.

©ILO Bilge Pinar Yenigun

73


BASIC NEEDS

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

SO

-C

IAL

CO

-H

ES

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 1

.1 S

helte

r is

prov

ided

to S

yria

ns

in th

e ca

mps

, she

lter

assi

stan

ce is

pro

-vi

ded

to v

ulne

rabl

e of

f-cam

p pe

rson

s an

d th

e G

over

nmen

t of

Tur

key

is s

up-

porte

d in

pro

vidi

ng

and

impr

ovin

g th

e co

nditi

ons

of s

helte

r so

lutio

ns

# of

in

divi

dual

s

supp

orte

d w

ith s

helte

r so

lutio

ns

Org

anis

a -tio

ns re

ports

; di

strib

utio

n lis

ts

# of

in

divi

d-ua

ls 1

39,0

00

10,

000

--

149

,000

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

gee

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

IOM

, AFA

D,

Partn

ers

20,0

80,0

00N

/A4

21

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

20,0

80,0

00

-

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

Ade

quat

e sh

elte

r sol

utio

ns c

ontin

ue to

be

avai

labl

e in

cam

p an

d to

mos

t vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

n in

urb

an a

reas

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?Q

3: S

ocia

l C

ohes

ion/

Stab

ility

?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f tar

gete

d in

divi

dual

s / H

Hs

prov

ided

or s

uppo

rted

with

ad

equa

te s

helte

r sol

utio

ns

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

TBD

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 80

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Dis

tribu

tion

lists

, Mon

thly

or

gani

zatio

nal

prog

ress

re

port

s/m

onth

ly

dash

boar

d

42

1

SE

CT

OR

RE

SP

ON

SE

OV

ER

VIE

W T

AB

LE

74

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R L

IVIN

G

IN C

OM

MU

-N

ITIE

S

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 1

.2 S

uppo

rt -in

g th

e G

over

nmen

t of

Tur

key

in a

sses

s-in

g th

e co

nditi

ons

of

and

enha

ncin

g sh

el-

ter i

nfra

stru

ctur

es

in th

e m

ost r

efug

ee

affe

cted

are

as, a

s re

ques

ted

# of

as-

sess

men

ts

cond

ucte

d by

GO

T w

ith

the

supp

ort

of h

uman

-ita

rian

com

mun

ity

to e

nhan

ce

shel

ter

cond

ition

s an

d ot

her

infra

stru

c -tu

re

Activ

ity

repo

rts,

asse

ssm

ent

repo

rts

# of

as

sess

-m

ents

--

--

1 as

sess

-m

ent c

on-

duct

ed o

r su

ppor

ted

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Sy

rian

refu

-ge

es, S

yria

n re

fuge

e ca

mps

in

S/E

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R,

AFAD

, M

oFSP

500,

000

N/A

43

2

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

500

,000

-

75


BASIC NEEDS

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

T-E

D C

OM

-M

UN

ITIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 2

.1 H

ouse

-ho

ld g

oods

pro

vide

d to

new

arri

vals

and

lim

ited

dist

ribut

ion

of N

FIs

for r

eple

n-is

hmen

t for

peo

ple

alre

ady

host

ed b

y th

e G

over

nmen

t of

Turk

ey in

the

cam

ps

(incl

. log

istic

s co

sts

for w

areh

ousi

ng a

nd

trans

port)

# of

per

sons

su

ppor

ted

with

NFI

s

Dis

tribu

tion

repo

rts, p

ost

dist

ribut

ion

mon

itorin

g,

field

uni

ts'

verif

icat

ion

# of

pe

rson

s 1

00,0

00

675

,000

-

-77

5,00

0G

over

no-

rate

s w

ith

high

con

-ce

ntra

tion

of S

yria

n re

fuge

es,

Syria

n re

fu-

gee

cam

ps

in S

/E T

urke

y

UN

HC

R,

IOM

, AFA

D,

MoF

SP,

Partn

er

NG

Os,

Lo

cal A

u -th

oriti

es

94,2

55,7

000

12

2

# of

per

sons

su

ppor

ted

with

Win

teri-

zatio

n Ite

ms

Dis

tribu

tion

repo

rts, p

ost

dist

ribut

ion

mon

itorin

g,

field

uni

ts'

verif

icat

ion

# of

pe

rson

s 1

00,0

00

675

,000

-

-77

5,00

0

Out

put 2

.3 V

ulne

r-ab

le h

ouse

hold

s in

cam

ps a

nd

host

com

mun

ities

su

ppor

ted

with

m

ultip

urpo

se c

ash

or e

mer

genc

y no

n-ca

sh a

ssis

tanc

e (fo

r N

FIs,

win

teriz

atio

n,

Hyg

iene

and

oth

er

basi

c ne

eds

exce

pt

food

and

edu

catio

n)

# of

per

sons

re

ceiv

ing

emer

genc

y,

cash

or

cash

-vou

ch-

er a

ssis

-ta

nce

Partn

ers'

di

strib

utio

n re

ports

, pos

t di

strib

utio

n m

onito

ring,

SO

Ps, a

ssis

-ta

nce

lists

# of

pe

rson

s 1

0,00

0 4

75,0

00

--

485,

000

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

-ge

e ca

mps

in

S/E

Tur

key

UN

HC

R,

IOM

, U

NIC

EF,

AFAD

, MoF

-SP

, Par

tner

N

GO

s,

Loca

l Au-

thor

ities

41,8

50,0

000

22

3

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

36,

105,

700

-

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

Targ

eted

pop

ulat

ions

hav

e co

ntin

ued

and

equi

tabl

e su

ppor

t to

mee

t the

ir ne

eds

for b

asic

and

dom

estic

item

sQ

1: C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t?Q

2: S

usta

inab

le

bene

fits?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 2

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f tar

gete

d in

divi

dual

s re

ceiv

ing

assi

stan

ce to

hel

p w

ith

thei

r bas

ic a

nd d

omes

tic it

em

need

s

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

TBD

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 75

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Dis

tribu

tion

repo

rts,

pa

rtne

r's

repo

rts,

age

ncy

repo

rts

22

3

76

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S

OF

VE

RI-

FIC

ATI

ON

UN

ITS

YR

LI

VIN

G IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R L

IVIN

G

IN C

OM

MU

-N

ITIE

S

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 2

.3 J

oint

so

cio-

econ

omic

an

alys

is o

f unm

et

basi

c ne

eds

in m

ain

refu

gee

host

ing

urba

n ar

eas,

to

supp

ort t

he G

oT in

re

spon

ding

to th

e ne

eds

of e

xtre

mel

y vu

lner

able

peo

ple.

# of

so -

cio-

econ

om-

ic a

naly

ses

cond

ucte

d

Anal

ysis

re

ports

# of

jo

int

anal

y-se

s

--

--

1 jo

int a

s-se

ssm

ent

cond

ucte

d

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

gee

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

UN

DP,

Lo

cal

auth

oriti

es,

Loca

l soc

ial

assi

stan

ce

mec

ha-

nism

s

850,

000

02

33

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

850

,000

-

77


BASIC NEEDS

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 3

.1 C

ore

hygi

ene

kits

and

ite

ms

are

prov

ided

in

cam

ps a

nd to

ex

trem

ely

vuln

erab

le

pers

ons

and

host

co

mm

uniti

es in

urb

an

setti

ngs

thro

ugh

com

mun

ity c

entre

s an

d/or

in p

artn

er-

ship

with

rele

vant

au

thor

ities

# of

per

sons

pr

ovid

ed

with

hyg

iene

ki

ts o

r oth

er

sani

tary

m

ater

ials

(in

clud

ing

sani

tary

su

pplie

s fo

r w

omen

and

gi

rls)

Dis

tribu

tion

repo

rts, p

ost

dist

ribut

ion

mon

itorin

g,

field

uni

ts'

verif

icat

ion

# of

pe

r -so

ns 2

20,0

00

1,5

20,0

00

200

,000

-

1,94

0,00

0

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

refu

gee

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

UN

HC

R,

UN

FPA,

U

NIC

EF,

IOM

, AFA

D,

Partn

er

NG

Os,

Lo

cal a

nd

Nat

iona

l au

thor

ities

14,6

90,0

000

22

2

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

14,

690,

000

-

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

Targ

eted

pop

ulat

ions

live

in s

atis

fact

ory

cond

ition

s of

san

itatio

n an

d hy

gien

eQ

1: C

apac

ity

Dev

elop

men

t?Q

2: S

usta

inab

le

bene

fits?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 3

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f tar

gete

d in

divi

dual

s pr

ovid

ed w

ith a

cces

s to

sa

nita

tion,

hyg

iene

ser

vice

s an

d fa

cilit

ies

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

TBD

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 50

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Mon

thly

pr

ogre

ss

repo

rts,

di

strib

utio

n lis

ts.

43

3

78

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I -TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

R-

ALL

BU

DG

ET)

U

SD

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 3

.2 S

uppo

rt to

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Tu

rkey

and

loca

l m

unic

ipal

ities

in

the

cons

truct

ion,

m

aint

enan

ce a

nd

impr

ovem

ent o

f co

mm

unity

san

itary

fa

cilit

ies

/ lat

rines

as

wel

l as

was

te m

an-

agem

ent s

yste

ms

in th

e ca

mps

and

in

urb

an a

reas

as

requ

este

d

# of

san

itary

fa

cilit

ies

cons

truct

ed

or im

prov

ed

Activ

ity

Repo

rts,

orga

nisa

-tio

ns re

ports

, pr

ojec

t re

ports

# of

fa-

cilit

ies

--

--

1,05

0

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Sy

rian

refu

-ge

es, S

yria

n re

fuge

e ca

mps

in

S/E

Turk

ey

UN

DP,

U

NH

CR,

IO

M, A

FAD

, Lo

cal

auth

oriti

es

49,3

50,0

000

53

3

# of

per

sons

su

ppor

t -ed

with

im

prov

ed

acce

ss

to W

ASH

se

rvic

es

Activ

ity

Repo

rts,

orga

nisa

-tio

ns re

ports

, pr

ojec

t re

ports

# of

pe

rson

s 3

00,0

00

107

,500

5

00,0

00

-90

7,50

0

# of

loca

l m

unic

ipal

-iti

es s

up-

porte

d

Activ

ity

Repo

rts,

orga

nisa

-tio

ns re

ports

, pr

ojec

t re

ports

# of

m

unic

i-pa

litie

s-

--

-2

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

49,

350,

000

-

79


BASIC NEEDS





FOR 2016

UNHCR 152,155,700 10,300,000 162,455,700

IOM 7,280,000 400,000 7,680,000

UNICEF 4,000,000 - 4,000,000

UNFPA 7,440,000 - 7,440,000

UNDP - 40,000,000 40,000,000

TOTAL 170,875,700 50,700,000 221,575,700

80

Lead Agencies UNDP

Partners UNHCR, FAO, ILO, IOM, UNIDO and partners

Objectives1. Improved livelihoods and living conditions at the local level, including

better and decent work conditions both for Syrians and host communities

GENDER MARKER 1


US$ 18,750,000


US$ 68,750,000


US$ 87,500,000

LIVELIHOODSSECTOR RESPONSE

668

7,080

63,000

18,500

%0 %20 %40 %60 %80 %100

# of male and female refugees and host community populationbenefiting from livelihoods and income generating activities and

trainings

# of refugees or host community members participating at thetrainings or receiving various grants.



81


LIVELIHOODS

CURRENT SITUATION 6,750 Syrians participated in social gathering, language and vocational activities. Language training included: Tomer, English, Arabic, and Yos. Livelihoods activities and life skills focussing on refugees living in communities are being prepared.

Technical analysis in consultation with municipality’s to identify local waste management equipment requirements to strengthen capacities of municipalities were completed.

Pilot vocational training programmes on textiles and apparel, aimed at women and youth began. Training of the trainers, and consultations with camp management and content of the training programmes were completed for three camps in two cities. Machinery was procured and gender training provided to trainers.

A field research study was undertaken to assess labour market demand and the status of Turkish employers to understand sectors, enterprises, and labour market expectations, and attitudes of Turkish employers towards Syrians labour participation. The study helped identify potential recommended policies. A situation analysis for Syrian children working on the streets in Çankaya, Altındag and Yenimahalle districts in Ankara was undertaken to identify demographic and socioeconomic status of street children and to understand the causes, living conditions and problems faced by street children.

To support livelihoods for families living in refugee camps projects were developed to address improved dietary living and nutritional awareness at family level. This will provide knowledge about horticulture production with limited land and water use. It will support restoration of agricultural livelihoods for rural communities hosting Syrian refugees with provision of short-term cash support (vouchers/cash grants) for key agricultural inputs and capacity development in good agricultural and marketing practices.

According to the 2015 study “Effects of the Syrian Refugees on Turkey” , the crisis led to public service deficits because of increased populations. Many refugees will possibly remain in Turkey for years, but do not yet have formal access to livelihoods and employment. They cannot positively contribute to society, or become

self-reliant, without the ability to work. This places risks within both host and refugee communities and can lead to community instability and social tensions, also with concrete implications of refugees seeking opportunities outside of Turkey, through irregular and dangerous routes.

The Regulation on Temporary Protection adopted in October 2014 foresaw access to work and social security for Syrian refugees. However, secondary legislation to detail the scope of this Regulation was still not announced as of October 2015. This legislative delay means work permit status of refugees is unresolved and limits refugees’ access to formal employment. Therefore, self-employment or illegal work remain the only options for refugees, which increases their risks of exploitation and low pay, and increases vulnerabilities of people and communities.

In the absence of opportunities for formal work, it is increasingly reported that refugees in Southeast provinces of Turkey take up informal jobs of unskilled Turkish workers, with very low wages (AFAD Report suggests that over 50 per cent of refugees living in communities earn less than USD250 per annum). This situation leads to discontent among vulnerable people, especially in poorer parts of Turkey who already face reductions in salaries dropping to one fifth of previous levels, since the crisis. Child labour is

common with children leaving school to supplement family incomes. Additionally, the cost of living increased significantly, with rents trebled, and incomes reduced, since the beginning of the crises, which is resulting in reduced purchasing power, inflation, and fewer employment opportunities overall.

On the other hand, there are some positive implications of the crisis on regional trade and local employment. For example, Gaziantep’s exports to Syria almost tripled in 2011-2014 according to Turkish Exporters Assembly. World Bank research suggests that while refugees displace informal, unpaid workers, they also generate demand for higher-quality jobs filled by Turkish workers.

Therefore, there is urgent need for developing policies, services and opportunities of employment/livelihoods taking into account the needs of the labor market to ensure self-reliance of the Syrian refugees and their peaceful co-existence in Turkey.

©IOM/ Cemil Carcar

82



Population In Need




Men 11,661 11,661 58,588 58,588

Women 11,712 11,712 58,844 58,844

Boys 3,666 3,666 18,421 18,421

Girls 3,462 3,462 17,397 17,397

Sub Total 30,501 30,500 153,250 153,250


Men 17,395 17,395 78,831 78,831

Women 17,471 17,471 79,175 79,175

Boys 5,469 5,469 24,785 24,785

Girls 5,165 5,165 23,408 23,408

Sub Total 45,500 45,500 206,200 206,200


Men 3,058 3,058 1,961,601 1,961,601

Women 3,071 3,071 1,970,167 1,970,167

Boys 962 962 616,748 616,748

Girls 908 908 582,484 582,484

Sub Total 8,000 8,000 *5,131,000 *5,131,000

Grand Total 84,000 84,000 5,490,450 5,490,450

Note: Populations in Need relate to only youth and adults age groups in need of employability and vocational skills training* number to be reviewed in 2016

Within refugee camps, some marketable livelihood initiatives undertaken included activities such as carpet weaving, sewing and hair dressing, while refugees living in urban areas are limited to informal, insecure, and low paid employment opportunities. This impacts women and youth, sometimes forcing them into exploitative coping strategies such as prostitution. Some sources report the daily rate for seasonal workers has been reduced by one fifth since the crises, and as little as USD 2.5 per day in the southeast Anatolia region, highlighting the exploitative nature of the informal labour market. To address this, the Ministry of Labour and Social Security developed a proposal to be adopted by the Council of Ministers, to enable refugees’ to access

©UNFPA

83


LIVELIHOODS

legal employment through a sectoral, geographical study of areas with potential for increased labour. Relevant 3RP partners will support policy development which aims to enhance decent and fair employment opportunities, reduce malpractices such as child labour and low wages.

While plans to address the refugee crises are undeveloped, the focus will be on employability and livelihoods opportunities. Capacities of local partners will be strengthened in order for them to support refugees in accessing employment and vocational skills.

Initiatives to improve job opportunities which are related to labour demand (e.g. new investments to boost local economic development, trade, and labour supply-related interventions to improve the quality of Syrian and vulnerable host community) will be undertaken. Skills development will include basic life skills training, Turkish language courses, entrepreneurshıp, and vocational training, responding to identified needs. Livelihood interventions (small enterprises, in kind grants and private sector engagement to establish livelihoods) will be explored in 2016.

Labour market assessments will be needed to analyse occupational and employability profiles of Syrian refugees and impacts on the labour market. These studies will assess the challenges faced by Syrian women, and the skills sets of Syrian and host community workers, to enable job matching exercises. Although the Government of Turkey conducts some research, increased livelihoods research is needed (which would be subject to prior Government approval in Turkey).

There is also need for further analysis of the local economy and sectors, with a view to strengthen the meaningful involvement of Syrian businesses in it. The almost three-fold increase in Gaziantep’s export show that there are business opportunities that can be used to engage with private sector, and expand employment opportunities.

When work permit legislation is complete, a communication strategy in coordination

with relevant authorities targeting Syrians and host communities will be needed to disseminate knowledge to encourage refugees to access to formal labour markets. As this legislation will allow registered refugees to access formal employment, it will also serve as a motivating incentive for more refugees to become registered which will also enable them to access formal employment and training opportunities. Further, the legislation will help reduce negative coping mechanisms, support

access to decent work that conforms to national laws, provide information on work conditions, labour rights, and Syrian worker responsibilities. Accessing national labour laws will in turn increase incomes and help families to send children to school, prevent child labour, early marriages, lost generations, and will improve women’s empowerment, and reduce gender-based violence. Overall, this will positively contribute towards self-reliance and social stability.

©UNDP/ Guray Balaban

84

STRATEGIC VISION & RESPONSE PLANThe 2015-2016 response is built on the assumption that the number of Syrian refugees in Turkey will reach 2.750 million in 2016 and most will remain in Turkey. Therefore there is an urgent need for targeted resources to build the resilience of individual people, refugees and host communities, and to strengthen institutions like central/local public service units to strengthen community resilience. It will be crucial to enable Syrian refugees to have a stake in society, and to become actively engaged in productive employment, to have hope and contribute to the economy. Such measures will also reduce the risks of social tensions, increase refugees’ self-reliance and mitigate negative impacts on host communities. Refugee and host communities can become resilient and prosper through a people-centric approach that helps establish sustainable livelihoods and skills for refugees, thus enabling them to contribute to the economy acquiring skills that can be utilized both in Turkey, or if they return to Syria, when conditions permit.

Creating opportunities for new skill sets and employment will not only reduce the flow of refugees to other countries through dangerous routes, but will contribute to the Turkish economy and social cohesion. The response in the Livelihoods sector will have two interconnected components: transitioning refugees from relief to self-reliance; and strengthening the stability of impacted communities. This will need both short-term and long-term interventions. Partners will develop refugee employability skills, to maximize employment opportunities and help to build the resilience of both refugee and host communities, prioritizing refugees living in Turkey for more than three years and whose resources are depleted. Livelihood opportunities will benefit both host and refugee communities.

When the adoption of the Temporary Protection Regulation permits access to employment, longer term interventions to increase the self-reliance of affected communities will be possible through

livelihoods. Until then, in 2016 the 3RP response strategy in Turkey will focus on improving employability, empowerment and entrepreneurship for impacted communities.

Initiatives to boost local economy, increase employment opportunities and job matching initiatives are needed. Livelihood response will enable low skilled employable refugees to integrate into the labor market by acquiring life skills and vocational training which also strengthens resilience and social stability.

The first step for identifying the needs for skills development will be skills mapping for Syrian refugees, which can identify the gaps between labour market needs and skills available. These skills will include entrepreneurial skills allowing Syrian entrepreneurs to establish new businesses individually or in partnership with Turkish entrepreneurs. This possibility will be available under the new legislative and administrative framework. Such assessments and training will be conducted in partnership with local agencies including the Employment Agency (ISKUR) and Entrepreneurship Support Administration (KOSGEB). Upon clarification of the terms and conditions of work permits for Syrians under Temporary Protection, use of cash-for-work schemes will also be explored and developed for short-term livelihood opportunities for refugees. Dialogue will need to be established with private sector, employers’ organizations and employers to facilitate access to decent employment opportunities for both Syrian refugee and host communities.

Advocacy for access to livelihood opportunities for Syrian refugees will reduce risk of exploitative negative coping mechanisms, and facilitate safe, dignified and decent work opportunities conforming with national labour laws.

Strengthening the capacity of local economies to increase work opportunities and of local institutions to provide

employment services to all Syrian and local workers will be a key component of the resilience strategy. Complementing short-term initiatives which aim at increasing employability and livelihoods for Syrian refugees, 3RP partners will respond with medium-term interventions addressing both the demand and supply side of the labour market. In this regard, dialogue needs to be established with workers’ organizations and partners to prevent potential risks of competition and conflicts between local and Syrian workers in order to establish a harmonized working environment for all.

Initiatives to strengthen local economic development to create employment for both communities will be based on comparative advantages of the region, mainly on agro-industry. Such initiatives will aim to strengthen the resilience of local economies through new investments for expanded production, marketing opportunities and increase labour demand (economic activities/investments).

3RP partners will explore piloting initiatives with the private sector to boost local economies through production of goods and services (including those addressing the needs of refugees) for Turkish workers and refugees alike. For example, establishing vocational training on textile and apparel making, inside the camps and making the refugees self-sufficient or even income-generators.

85


LIVELIHOODS O

BJE

CT

IVE

1Im

prov

ed L

ivel

ihoo

ds a

nd li

ving

con

ditio

ns a

t the

loca

l lev

el, i

nclu

ding

bet

ter a

nd d

ecen

t wor

k co

nditi

ons

both

for

Syria

ns a

nd h

ost c

omm

uniti

es

Q1:

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent?

Q2:

Sus

tain

able

be

nefit

s?

Q3:

Soc

ial

Coh

esio

n/St

abili

ty?

OB

JEC

TIV

E 1

IN

DIC

AT

OR

% o

f tar

gete

d Sy

rians

with

in

crea

sed

acce

ss to

voc

atio

nal

train

ing

and

livel

ihoo

ds

oppo

rtun

ities

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

BA

SE

LIN

E:

N/A

OB

JEC

TIV

E

IND

ICA

TO

R

TA

RG

ET

: 10

%M

EA

NS

OF

V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

N

Indi

cate

wha

t w

ill b

e th

e m

eans

of

verifi

catio

n fo

r th

is in

dica

tor

SE

CT

OR

RE

SP

ON

SE

OV

ER

VIE

W T

AB

LE

A. R

EFU

GE

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI -

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S O

F V

ER

IFIC

A-

TIO

NU

NIT

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CA

MP

S

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

SU

S-

TAIN

-A

BLE

B

EN

E-

FITS

?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TA-

BIL

ITY

?

Out

put 1

.1: S

uppo

rt em

ploy

abilit

y/

voca

tiona

l ski

lls o

f m

ale

and

fem

ale

refu

gees

to b

ette

r re

spon

d to

the

need

s of

the

labo

ur m

arke

t de

man

d

# of

mal

e an

d fe

mal

e re

fuge

es

and

host

co

mm

unity

po

pula

tion

bene

fit-

ing

from

vo

catio

nal

train

ing

Activ

ity

Repo

rts

No.

of

pers

ons

30,5

0045

,500

8,00

00

84,0

00

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

, Sy

rian

cam

ps in

S/

E Tu

rkey

UN

DP

(G

AP R

DA,

IS

KUR,

and

se

rvic

e pr

o -vi

ders

),FAO

, (M

in. o

f Fo

od A

gri-

cultu

re, a

nd

Live

stoc

k),

UN

HC

R,

IOM

, ILO

, pa

rtner

s,

Gov

erno

-ra

tes,

and

Mun

icip

al-

ities

, wor

k-er

s, a

nd

empl

oyer

or

gani

za-

tions

18,7

50,0

0070

0,00

02

34

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

18,

750,

000

700

,000

86

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S

OF

VE

RI-

FIC

ATI

ON

UN

ITS

YR

LI

VIN

G IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

U-

NIT

IES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI -

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

T FO

R 2

016

(US

D)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL -

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

ILI-

TY?

Out

put 1

.2:Im

pact

-ed

com

mun

ities

pr

ovid

ed w

ith

ente

rpre

nuer

ship

su

ppor

t inc

ludi

ng

skills

bui

ldin

g an

d bu

sine

ss s

uppo

rt

# of

refu

fees

or

hos

t co

mm

unity

m

embe

rs

parti

cipa

t -in

g at

the

train

ing

or

rece

ivin

g va

rious

gr

ants

Activ

ity

Repo

rts

No.

of

pers

ons

1,50

02,

750

3,00

00

7,25

0

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Sy

rian

refu

-ge

es, S

yria

n ca

mps

in

S/E

Turk

ey

UN

DP,

UN

-H

CR,

GAP

RD

A, a

nd

gove

rno -

rate

s, lo

cal

busi

ness

co

mm

unity

, FA

O, M

inis

try

of F

ood

Agri -

cultu

re, a

nd

Live

stoc

k

26,2

00,0

0060

0,00

02

44

Out

put 1

.3: E

m-

ploy

men

t sup

port

inte

rven

tions

pro

vid-

ed in

clud

ing

loca

l w

orkf

orce

ana

lysi

s of

Syr

ian

men

and

w

omen

and

hos

t co

mm

uniti

es, i

ncom

e ge

nera

tion

train

ing

for S

yria

n an

d ho

st

popu

latio

n (w

ith

spec

ific

focu

s on

yo

uth)

to e

nsur

e th

e de

velo

pmen

t of m

ar-

keta

ble

skills

and

al-

tern

ativ

e pu

blic

wor

k sc

hem

es, i

nclu

ding

w

ide

rang

ing

train

ing

that

incl

ude

basi

c lif

e sk

ills, l

angu

age,

em

ploy

men

t an

d in

com

e ge

nera

tion

train

ing

# of

men

an

d w

omen

be

nefit

-in

g fro

m

empl

oym

ent

and

inco

me

gene

ratio

n

entrp

re-

neur

ship

se

rvic

es

Activ

ity

Repo

rts

No.

of

pers

ons

1,00

036

,800

15,5

000

53,3

00

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Sy

rian

refu

-ge

es, S

yria

n ca

mps

in

S/E

Turk

ey

UN

DP,

U

NH

CR,

ILO

, IO

M, U

NID

O,

AFAD

, MoS

IT,

GAP

, RD

A,

and

Gov

er-

nora

tes,

loca

l bu

sine

ss

com

mun

ity,

wor

kers

and

em

ploy

er o

r-ga

niza

tions

20,5

00,0

00

Iden

tify

the

part

of b

udge

tary

re

quire

men

t de

sign

ated

to

NLG

act

iviti

es

44

4

87


LIVELIHOODS

B. R

ES

ILIE

NC

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OU

TPU

TS

M&

E IN

DIC

ATO

RS

TAR

GE

TED

PO

PU

LATI

ON

BY

TY

PE

(IN

DI-

VID

UA

LS) I

N 2

016

TOTA

L TA

RG

ETE

DLO

CA

TIO

NP

AR

TNE

RS

BU

DG

ET

RE

SIL

IEN

CE

LE

NS

IND

ICA

TOR

ME

AN

S

OF

VE

RI-

FIC

ATI

ON

UN

ITS

YR

LI

VIN

G IN

C

AM

PS

SY

R

LIV

ING

IN

CO

MM

UN

I-TI

ES

ME

M-

BE

RS

OF

IMP

AC

TED

C

OM

MU

NI-

TIE

S

OTH

ER

P

OP

G

RO

UP

S

BU

DG

ETA

RY

R

EQ

UIR

E-

ME

NT

FOR

20

16 (U

SD

)

NLG

BU

DG

ET

(A

S P

AR

T O

F TH

E O

VE

RA

LL

BU

DG

ET)

US

D

Q1:

CA

-P

AC

ITY

D

EV

EL-

OP

-M

EN

T?

Q2:

S

US

-TA

IN-

AB

LE

BE

NE

-FI

TS?

Q3:

S

OC

IAL

CO

HE

-S

ION

/S

TAB

IL-

ITY

?

Out

put 1

.4: A

doca

cy

and

awar

enes

s-ra

isin

g fo

r the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

labo

ur re

gula

tions

an

d th

e ne

w la

bour

la

w (w

hen

pass

ed),

to

redu

ce w

orst

form

s of

la

bour

exp

loita

tion

and

child

labo

ur ta

rget

ing

empl

oyer

s an

d m

ale

/fe

mal

e em

ploy

ees

with

a v

iew

to in

crea

se

acce

ss o

f the

Syr

ian

re

fuge

e po

pula

tions

to

lega

l wor

k

# of

ad

voca

cy

inte

rven

tions

an

d aw

are -

ness

rais

ing

cam

paig

ns

on la

bour

re

gula

tions

Activ

ity

Repo

rts

# of

ad -

voca

cy

rela

ted

even

ts

50,0

0055

,000

7,00

03,

000

10

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Sy

rian

refu

-ge

es, S

yria

n ca

mps

in

S/E

Turk

ey

UN

HC

R, IL

O,

Gov

erno

-ra

tes,

and

Pr

ovin

cial

D

irect

orat

es,

of L

abou

r, w

orke

rs a

nd

empl

oyer

or -

gani

zatio

ns

1,20

0,00

020

0,00

03

55

Out

put 1

.5:J

oint

as

sess

emen

ts c

arrie

d ou

t in

urba

n an

d ru

ral

setti

ngs

with

focu

s on

m

ain

host

ing

area

s ,

with

a v

iew

to id

entif

y po

ssib

le in

terv

entio

ns

for e

nhan

ced

busi

ness

an

d jo

b op

portu

nitie

s fo

r men

and

wom

en.,

with

a fo

cus

on th

e ga

p be

twee

n la

bour

de

man

d an

d su

pply

fo

r mal

e an

d fe

mal

e w

orkf

orce

# of

ass

ess-

men

ts o

n th

e im

pact

of

the

cris

es

on th

e lo

cal

econ

omy

with

focu

s on

mai

n ho

stin

g ar

eas,

in

clud

ing

the

impa

ct

of c

ash

assi

stan

ce

on lo

cal

econ

omy

Activ

ity

Repo

rts

As-

sess

e-m

ents

10

0,00

010

5,00

010

5,00

03,

000

5

Gov

erno

-ra

tes

with

hi

gh c

on-

cent

ratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

UN

DP,

ILO

, IIO

M,F

AO,

Gov

eror

ates

an

d lo

cal

busi

ness

co

mm

unity

w

orke

rs a

nd

empl

oyer

or -

gani

zatio

ns

1,05

0,00

050

,000

33

3

Out

put 1

.6:S

uppo

rt

pilo

t ini

tiativ

es w

ith

the

priv

ate

and

/or

publ

ic s

ecto

rs a

imed

at

boo

stin

g th

e lo

cal

econ

omie

s th

roug

h th

e pr

oduc

tion

of g

oods

an

d se

rvic

es

# of

peo

ple

bene

fitin

g

from

pilo

t in

itiat

ives

.

No.

of R

e -po

rts a

nd

bene

ficie

ry

feed

back

750

506,

250

1000

500

700

4

Gov

eror

ates

w

ith h

igh

conc

en-

tratio

n of

Syr

ian

refu

gees

UN

HC

R, U

N-

IDO

, AFA

D,

MoS

IT, P

ri -va

te S

ecto

r, M

inis

try o

f La

bour

, oth

er

rele

vent

au

thor

ities

14,3

00,0

000

43

3

TOTA

L B

UD

GE

TAR

Y R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS A

T O

UTP

UT

LEV

EL

46,

700,

000

600

,000

88

LIVELIHOODS





FOR 2016

UNDP 6,000,000 26,250,000 32,250,000

IOM 2,000,000 4,100,000 6,100,000

FAO 1,500,000 4,500,000 6,000,000

ILO 4,000,000 4,800,000 8,800,000

UNHCR 5,250,000 14,100,000 19,350,000

UNIDO - 15,000,000 15,000,000

TOTAL 18,750,000 68,750,000 87,500,000

turkey - 3rp regional refugee & resilience plan … turkey regional refugee & resilience...

Documents