pdf blood donation costly signalling

1
Its just a little blood Lyle, H. F., Smith, E. A., & Sullivan, R. J. (2009). Blood donations as costly signals of donor quality. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 263-286. Why do we give blood in the first place? Blood donation is pure altruism, there is NO direct benefit to the donor This may explain shortages in blood supply The Costly Signalling Theory suggests donors are honestly signalling cooperative intent and good genetic health AIM: to see if - donors are seen as generous (supported) and healthy (supported) the perceived costs reduce likelihood of donating (supported) and differ between donors & non donors (supported) so we can encourage others MEthod: 346 college students completed an online survey assessing (using likert scales): Cost of donating (Anxiety, pain, negative health consequences, inconvenience) Perceived generosity of donors vs blood demand perceived health of donors Likelihood to make a future donation Compared donor and non donor groups Results: a significant negative relationship was found between likelihood of future donation and both potential negative health consequences and anxiety Donors were found to be considerably less concerned about anticipated pain and anxiety than non donors Blood donors were perceived by both groups to be healthy and disease free, but being physically fit was deemed unnecessary Discussion: A costly signal only serves a positive function if the receiver understands its worth The results show that people understood the need for blood, and so consider donation a generous & altruistic act Reduced anxiety in donors may make them more attractive as an ally or potential mate as they appear to cope better under pressure f u t u r e research should test wether generosity of d o n o r s generalises to other circumstances Luke Costley White

Upload: luke-costley-white

Post on 09-Aug-2015

18 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Its just a little blood Lyle, H. F., Smith, E. A., & Sullivan, R. J. (2009). Blood donations as costly signals of donor quality. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 263-286.

Why do we give blood in the first place? • Blood donation is pure altruism, there is NO

direct benefit to the donor

• This may explain shortages in blood supply

• The Costly Signalling Theory suggests donors are honestly signalling cooperative intent and good genetic health !• AIM: to see if -

• donors are seen as generous (supported) and healthy (supported)

• the perceived costs reduce likelihood of donating (supported)

• and differ between donors & non donors (supported) !

• so we can encourage others

MEthod: • 346 college students

completed an online survey assessing (using likert scales): • Cost of donating (Anxiety, pain,

negative health consequences, inconvenience) • Perceived generosity of

donors vs blood demand • perceived health of

donors • Likelihood to make a

future donation • Compared donor and non

donor groups

Results: • a s i g n i f i c a n t n e g at i v e

relationship was found between likelihood of future donation and both potential negative health consequences and anxiety

• D o n o r s w e r e f o u n d t o b e considerably less concerned about anticipated pain and anxiety than non donors

• Blood donors were perceived by both groups to be healthy and disease free, but being physically fit was deemed unnecessary

Discussion: • A costly signal only

s e rv e s a p o s i t i v e f u n c t i o n i f t h e receiver understands its worth

• The results show that people understood the need for blood, and so consider donation a generous & altruistic act

• Reduced anxiety in donors may make them more attractive as an ally or potential mate as they appear to cope better under pressure

• f u t u r e r e s e a r c h should test w e t h e r generosity of d o n o r s generalises to other circumstances

Luke Costley White