PBN Implementation Plan Norway ICAO EUR PBN TF & EUROCONTROL RAiSG

Brussel 12-14 March 2014

PBN Implementation Plan - NORWAY

• PBN Implementation plan Norway

• PBN organization in Norway

• Status PBN implementation

• PBN planning 2014-2016

• PBN requirements and reversionary modes

• Challenges

- Edition 1.0 (December 2009)

- Revision 2.0 (February 2012)

- Revision 3.0 (June 2013)

AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLAD AT:

http://www.luftfartstilsynet.no/avdelinger/Flyplass_og_flysikring/article10421.ece

PBN Organization in Norway

PBN project Group (CAA)

PBN plan working group (CAA and Avinor)

AIM

Coordination meeting

ATM/AIM

Prioritized/documented

APV/LNAV and RNAV 1

SID/STAR procedures

from airport divisions

(Avinor airports)

AIRAC-plan

Avinor input

to PBN plan

CAA

PBN-plan

Non-

Avinor

airports

PBN Group

Stakeholder

meetings (CAA)

PBN Project

National regulation (BSL G 4-1): Implement APV procedures at all instrument

RWY ends within 31 December 2016

P-RNAV (RNAV 1) SID og STAR – ATC airports

Status AIRAC 06 MAR 2014

TMA ATC airports SID STAR Infrastructure (RNAV)

Oslo ENGM P-RNAV P-RNAV GNSS or DME/DME

Farris ENTO

ENRY

P-RNAV

P-RNAV

P-RNAV

P-RNAV

GNSS or DME/DME

Kjevik ENCN P-RNAV P-RNAV GNSS

Sola ENZV

ENHD

Conventional

Conventional

P-RNAV

P-RNAV

GNSS (DME/DME planned)

GNSS

Flesland ENBR Conventional P-RNAV GNSS (DME/DME planned)

Vigra ENAL Conventional P-RNAV GNSS

Kvernberget ENKB Conventional P-RNAV

Conventional

GNSS

Ørland ENOL Conventional None

Vaernes ENVA P-RNAV P-RNAV GNSS

Røros ENRO None None -

Bodø ENBO P-RNAV P-RNAV GNSS

Evenes ENEV Conventional Conventional

Bardufoss ENDU Conventional Conventional

Andøya ENAN None Conventional

Tromsø ENTC P-RNAV P-RNAV GNSS

Alta ENAT Conventional Conventional

Banak ENNA Conventional Conventional

Kirkenes ENKR RNAV 1 RNAV 1 GNSS

APV Instrument Runway ends

• Instrument RWY end where an APV (LPV and/or LNAV/VNAV)

procedure can be established based upon the valid Pans Ops

criteria

• LPV: Max +- 5º offset from the extended centreline and with Vertical

Path angle (VPA) up to 6,3º

• Some RWY ends which are LPV capable by design can not have

the procedure implemented due lack of EGNOS coverage north of

70N

• LNAV/VNAV (Baro-VNAV): No offset from extended centreline and

with a VPA limit of 3º - 3,5º

• 77 APV Instrument RWY ends (+8 RWY ends possible APV

candidates)

Total 108 RWY ends.

Status pr. AIRAC 06 MAR 2014

ATS RWY

ends

APV RWY

ends

LNAV APV RNP AR A-RNP SCAT-1

(GBAS)

ATC (20) 46 39* 21 0 0 0

AFIS (33) 62 38* 30 0 0 0 26

Total 108 77* 51 0 0 0 26

RNP AR and A-RNP procedures will be implemented as necessary in close cooperation with

airport and operator

* Possible 5 more ATC RWY ends and 3 more AFIS RWY ends. Analysis required

PBN Implementation 2014 - 2016

• Safety Assesments for LNAV and APV under development (Q2 2014)

• RNAV 1 (P-RNAV) SID/STAR at all airports with ATC/AFIS medio 2015

• LNAV /APV procedures 2014-2016 • 23 LNAV/VNAV and 13 LPV planned on AIRAC 13 NOV 2014

• Implementation plan 2015/2016 under development

• RNP AR /Advanced RNP as necessary 2015-2016

PBN - requirements and revisionary modes

Flight phase NAV-

application NAV

specification NAV

infrastructure NAV infra

Back-up NAV appl.

Fall-back

En-route

Bodø Oceanic

ATS-ruter RNP 10 GNSS IRS/INS

En-route ATS-ruter RNAV 5

(B-RNAV) GNSS VOR/DME

(required)

Radar

TMA SID/STAR RNAV 1

(P-RNAV) GNSS DME/DME

(as necessary)*

Radar

Conventional SID/STAR

Vectoring service

APP IAP APV LNAV

GNSS Conventional (LS, VOR/ DME, NDB)

Conventional IAP

(type/number based on

analysis)

* DME/DME coverage will only be established as necessary in TMAs taking into account

TFC/complexity. Oslo TMA and Farris TMA have DME/DME coverage. DME/DME coverage is also

planned established in Sola TMA and Flesland TMA, no other plans.

Challenges:

• EGNOS coverage north of 70° N

• Coverage limitation north of 70°N

• Geometrical limitations at high latitude ( >60°N ?)

• Barometric issues at extreme low temperatures

• APV / LNAV safety assessment

• NO users of LPV …

Coverage beyond 70N ?

LPV:

13 airports outside EGNOS coverage!

(10 on mainland, 3 at Svalbard)

LPV is not an option until coverage is extended!!

High latitude Coverage calculations

«Challenges» related to foilage, shadowing and

reflections/multipath tend to increase at higher latitudes …

09 0 9

High latitude Coverage calculations

- Antenna radiation (reception) pattern:

Effective view of antenna

w/ antenna mask

𝜶

𝜷

09 0 9

Where α = satellite elevation angle,

and β = a/c antenna masking angle,

defined as when the amplification of the

antenna drops below 0 dBic.

Conclusion; LPV will require: α ≥ β

Note; β (angle where 0 dBic) is typically at 15°…

09 0 9

High latitude Coverage calculations

𝜶

09 0 9

Cross-wind:

25 G 35

High Latitude Coverage calculations:

- Other complications; crosswind

- Crab … or

- Slip …?

Question for the pilots in the audience; What is the preferred cross-wind approach

method at «narrow and short runways» when flying a regional aircraft ..?

LPV at high latitude

Theoretical

«cut off» at 70°N

Practical «cut off» due to antenna

reception pattern?

Practical “cut off” due to antenna

reception pattern AND 15° roll angle

(side-slip during final approach) ?

APV (Baro-VNAV):

Baro-VNAV

MET-conditions:

In the blue’er areas (plus Svalbard)

we typically have “dry climate

conditions”:

Summer : + 30° C,

Winter : - 45° C

Develop “winter” and “summer” IAP?

Conclusions on the challenges:

Administrative issues comment

APV / LNAV safety assessment Sorted

NO operators equipped for LPV Remains a PROBLEM

Technical issues Status

«Baro» issues at extreme low

temperatures

Sorted

No EGNOS coverage north of

70° N latitude

Planned expanded in 2015 ..?

EGNOS coverage/geometrical

limitations at high latitude

Solvable if EGNOS signals

were transmittes by non-GEO

satellites … this will be available

in 20??...?

Thank you for your attention!

Questions ?

Norwegian PBN Implementation team