pancreatic cancer perspectives is there any improvement ? pancreatic cancer perspectives is there...
TRANSCRIPT
Pancreatic cancer Pancreatic cancer perspectives perspectives
Is there any improvement ?Is there any improvement ?
Pancreatic cancer Pancreatic cancer perspectives perspectives
Is there any improvement ?Is there any improvement ?
• 10-15% resectable– DFI 8-13 months– Most recurrences within 2 years
• Recurrences– Retroperitoneum (34-87%)– Liver (38-73%)– Peritoneum (19-53%)– Extraabdominal sites (8-29%)
March 2009March 2009March 2009March 2009
• Predictors for recurrence– Grade, size, nodes, resection margin,
vascular/lymphatic/perineural invasion
• 5-year survival– Node negative disease 25-30%– Node positive disease 10%
• Distant Metastases >> isolated local recurrence
March 2009March 2009March 2009March 2009
• Chemotherapy– Which drugs?
• Role of radiotherapy – Standard?– R1 disease?
• Neoadjuvant treatment– Chemotherapy / radiotherapy– Downstaging
• Definitive chemoradiotherapy
Adjuvant TreatmentAdjuvant TreatmentAdjuvant TreatmentAdjuvant Treatment
Oettle, JAMA 2007, 267
Gemcitabine vs ObservationGemcitabine vs Observation CONKO-001CONKO-001
Gemcitabine vs ObservationGemcitabine vs Observation CONKO-001CONKO-001
RGemcitabine1000 mg/m2 3/4 Wo
Observation
Neoptolemos, NEJM 2004, 1200
European Study Group for Pancreatic CancerEuropean Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer ESPAC-1 ESPAC-1
European Study Group for Pancreatic CancerEuropean Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer ESPAC-1 ESPAC-1
2xFU 500x3 6xFU+LV Beides
Protocol Violations• 30% Chemoradiation
• 9% nil• 50% Chemotherapy
• 17% nil
ComparisonComparison CONKO-001 vs ESPAC-1CONKO-001 vs ESPAC-1
ComparisonComparison CONKO-001 vs ESPAC-1CONKO-001 vs ESPAC-1
ESPAC-1 CONKO-001
2-J-Survival
5-J-Survival
40% v 21%
21% v 9%
47% v 42%
22% v 11%
1-J-DFS 58% v 43% 58% v 31%
Adjuvant Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy
Adjuvant Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy
Adjuvant Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy
Adjuvant Adjuvant ChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy
442 patientswith resected pancreatic cancer
Radiotherapy 50.4 Gy+ FU 250 mg/m2 CI
3 weeksFU 250 mg/m2 CI
Regine, JAMA 2008, 1019
Adjuvante ChemoradiotherapyAdjuvante ChemoradiotherapyGemcitabine vs FluorouracilGemcitabine vs FluorouracilAdjuvante ChemoradiotherapyAdjuvante ChemoradiotherapyGemcitabine vs FluorouracilGemcitabine vs Fluorouracil
12 weeksFU 250 mg/m2 CI
3 weeksGEM1000 mg/m2
12 weeksGEM1000 mg/m2
RTOG 9704
• Median Survival 20.9 Mo (G) vs 16.9 Mo (FU)• 3-J-Survival 31% vs 22% (p=0.09)
ComparisonComparisonAdjuvant TrialsAdjuvant Trials
ComparisonComparisonAdjuvant TrialsAdjuvant Trials
119 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Radiotherapy 60 Gy+ FU 300 mg/m2 CI+ Cisplatin 20 mg/m2 d1-5
Chauffert, Ann Oncol 2008, 1592
Gemcitabine1000 mg/m2 7/8 Wo
• Median Survival 14.3 Mo (G) vs 8.4 Mo (p=0.014)• 1-J-Survival 51% vs 24% (p=0.03)
Gemcitabine1000 mg/m2 3/4 Wo
Definitive ChemoradiotherapyDefinitive ChemoradiotherapyDefinitive ChemoradiotherapyDefinitive Chemoradiotherapy
Loehrer, ASCO 2008
Definitive ChemoradiotherapyDefinitive ChemoradiotherapyECOG 4201ECOG 4201
Definitive ChemoradiotherapyDefinitive ChemoradiotherapyECOG 4201ECOG 4201
9.2 v 11 Mo (.034)
6 mos 12 mos 18 mos 24 mos
GEM alone 76% 32% 11% 4%
GEM plus XRT 74% 50% 29% 12%
Huguet, JCO 2007, 326
Test chemotherapy before definitive Test chemotherapy before definitive ChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy
Test chemotherapy before definitive Test chemotherapy before definitive ChemoradiotherapyChemoradiotherapy
15 v 11.7 Mo (.0009)
10.8 v 7.4 Mo (.005)
• Chemotherapy– Which drugs? Gemcitabine, ESPAC-3
• Role of radiotherapy – Standard? Probably not– R1 disease? Maybe
• Neoadjuvant treatment– Chemotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy? Efficacy– Increase resectability? Worth a try
• Definitive chemoradiotherapy? Sequential
Adjuvant TreatmentAdjuvant TreatmentAdjuvant TreatmentAdjuvant Treatment
Gem ± Marimasmat (Bramhall, 2002) NA 5.5
Gem ± Pemetrexed (Richards, 2004) 3.3 6.2Gem ± CPT-11 (Rocha-Lima, 2004) 3.4 6.3
Gem ± Tifarbinib (Van Cutsem, 2004) 3.7 6.4Gem ± Exatecan (O’Reilly, 2004) 3.7 6.7
Gem ± Cisplatin (Heinemann, 2003) 5.3 7.5Gem ± Oxaliplatin (Louvet, 2004) 5.8 9.0Gem ± Oxaliplatin (Poplin, 2006) - 5.9Gem ± Bevacizumab (Kindler, 2007) - 6.1Gem ± Cetuximab (Philip, 2007) - 6.4Gem ± Erlotinib (Moore, 2005) 3.7 6.4
Gem ± 5FU bolus (Berlin, 2002) 3.4 6.7
Gem ± Capecitabine (Cunningham, 2005) - 7.4
Gem ± Capecitabine (Herrmann, 2005) 4.8 8.4Gem ± 5FU/LV (Riess, 2005) 4.9 5.9
Best chemotherapy option in metastatic Best chemotherapy option in metastatic pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer
Best chemotherapy option in metastatic Best chemotherapy option in metastatic pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer
Sultana, JCO 2007, 2607
Moore, JCO 2007, 1960
Gemcitabine Gemcitabine ± ± ErlotinibErlotinibGemcitabine Gemcitabine ± ± ErlotinibErlotinib
Overall Survival by Treatment Arm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 12 24 36Months After Registration
GemcitabineGemcitabine and Cetuximab
N369366
Events338331
Medianin Months
66
P = 0.14
5.96.4
Philip, ASCO 2007
Gemcitabine Gemcitabine ± ± CetuximabCetuximabSWOG S0205SWOG S0205
Gemcitabine Gemcitabine ± ± CetuximabCetuximabSWOG S0205SWOG S0205
Moore, ASCO 2007
Possible predictive factors for EGFR drugsPossible predictive factors for EGFR drugsKRAS StatusKRAS Status
Possible predictive factors for EGFR drugsPossible predictive factors for EGFR drugsKRAS StatusKRAS Status
Pelzer, Proc ASCO 2008, 4508
Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer
Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer
Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer
Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic Second-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer
Pelzer, Proc ASCO 2008, 4508
• Adjuvant chemotherapy• Maybe chemoradiotherapy in R1 disease• Hint of additive effect of EGFR drugs in metastatic
disease• Effective second-line chemotherapy in metastatic
disease– May have impact on choice of first-line chemotherapy
• Only translational research will lead to real progress
Improvements in the treatment of Improvements in the treatment of pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer
Improvements in the treatment of Improvements in the treatment of pancreatic cancerpancreatic cancer