otgb - student symposium poster

1
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2007 www.PosterPresentations.com Implementation of safety control systems in laboratory station for advanced research in energy storage Introduction Automated systems have proven to improve safety and increase productivity. In compliance with Oregon Tech’s Safety Policy, this project will outline safe and reliable equipment to further the research in energy storage on campus. Objectives Method Results Renewable Energy Engineering Paulo Vasconcelos, Frank Rytkonen, PE, Dr. Claudia Torres Garibay, Dr. Lawrence J Wolf, PE The main objectives of this project are: 1. To develop a Safety Study Analysis of incident causes 2. To design and implement safety control systems 3. To develop engineering documentation and training Motivation: • Safety is a priority for Oregon Tech. • Help fellow students to focus on their research not on monitoring the system. Fig. 2. Damage inside glovebox after incident. Fig. 6. Protection Layers. Old system had only the first layer of protection. Fig. 7. Remote monitoring system schematic. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people: • Frank Rytkonen, PE, Dr. Claudia Torres Garibay and Dr. Lawrence J Wolf and John Beaudry from Jacobs. • Jeremiah Deboever, Michelle Kantor and Jon Waldrip that provided me the inspiration to take-on this project. • All Oregon Tech classmates, staff and faculty who were involved in the process. Conclusions Paulo [email protected] 503.781.8577 Fig. 3. Major damage. Reconstruction to determine cause of implosion. Preliminary Hazard Analysis Examples Fig. 1. Glove box in operation Documentation & Training - Phase 3: • System documentation (i.e. PFD, P&IDs, Loop diagrams, mechanical installation details, spec sheets) • Operation Manual • Maintenance Manuals User’s training. Process Function Potential Failure Potential Effect RPN Normal Operation Low pressure inside work chamber Gloves implosion, equipment/materials damage and human injury 1000 Gas supply depleted 800 Boundaries leak outwards work chamber Oxygen levels inside work chamber increase damaging chemicals, solutions, cathodes and anodes 720 Oxygen levels inside work chamber high Start -up after emergency shut down Oxygen levels inside work chamber high Chemicals, solution, cathodes and anodes damage 800 Table I – Highest Risk Priority Numbers (FMEA) Monitoring System This work developed safety control systems that were installed on the glove box in the REE Laboratory. The final goal ensured that the laboratory station is safer for student researchers develop projects without the need to constantly monitor the glove box variables. Multiple new features: (1)improved safety (2)remote monitoring capabilities (3)graphic user interface (GUI) (4)user's guide and maintenance manuals (5)design and implementation documentation (6)connection to an external Potentiostat. Contact Information Fig. 9. Personal devices GUI Fig. 4. Incident about to happen. Fig. 5. Engineering Design Process (Hynes, 2010) Fig. 11. PLC and Vacuum Pump control panels. Fig. 8. DL06-AR PLC and DIN-AP3 home automation unit Fig. 12. System setup. Student Project Symposium June 2016 Fig. 10. HMI Screens and Alarms

Upload: paulo-vasconcelos

Post on 14-Apr-2017

34 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2007

www.PosterPresentations.com

Implementation of safety control systems in laboratory

station for advanced research in energy storage

Introduction

Automated systems have proven to improve safetyand increase productivity. In compliance with OregonTech’s Safety Policy, this project will outline safe andreliable equipment to further the research in energystorage on campus.

Objectives

Method Results

Renewable Energy EngineeringPaulo Vasconcelos, Frank Rytkonen, PE, Dr. Claudia Torres Garibay, Dr. Lawrence J Wolf, PE

The main objectives of this project are:

1. To develop a Safety Study Analysis of incidentcauses

2. To design and implement safety control systems3. To develop engineering documentation and

training

Motivation:• Safety is a priority for Oregon Tech.• Help fellow students to focus on their research not on monitoring the system.

Fig. 2. Damage inside glovebox after incident.

Fig. 6. Protection Layers. Old system had only thefirst layer of protection.

Fig. 7. Remote monitoring system schematic.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the following people:

• Frank Rytkonen, PE, Dr. Claudia Torres Garibay and Dr.Lawrence J Wolf and John Beaudry from Jacobs.• Jeremiah Deboever, Michelle Kantor and Jon Waldrip thatprovided me the inspiration to take-on this project.• All Oregon Tech classmates, staff and faculty who wereinvolved in the process.

Conclusions

[email protected]

Fig. 3. Major damage. Reconstruction to determine cause of implosion.

Preliminary Hazard Analysis ExamplesFig. 1. Glove box in operation

Documentation & Training - Phase 3:• System documentation (i.e. PFD, P&IDs, Loop diagrams, mechanical installation details, spec sheets)• Operation Manual• Maintenance Manuals• User’s training.

Process Function

Potential Failure Potential Effect RPN

Normal Operation

Low pressure inside work chamber Gloves implosion,

equipment/materials damage

and human injury

1000

Gas supply depleted 800

Boundaries leak outwards work chamber

Oxygen levels inside work chamber

increase damaging chemicals, solutions,

cathodes and anodes

720

Oxygen levels inside work chamber high

Start-up after emergency shut down

Oxygen levels inside work chamber high

Chemicals, solution, cathodes and

anodes damage800

Table I – Highest Risk Priority Numbers (FMEA)

Monitoring System

This work developed safety control systems that wereinstalled on the glove box in the REE Laboratory. The finalgoal ensured that the laboratory station is safer for studentresearchers develop projects without the need to constantlymonitor the glove box variables.Multiple new features:(1)improved safety(2)remote monitoring capabilities(3)graphic user interface (GUI)(4)user's guide and maintenance manuals(5)design and implementation documentation(6)connection to an external Potentiostat.

Contact Information

Fig. 9. Personal devices GUI

Fig. 4. Incident about to happen.

Fig. 5. Engineering Design Process (Hynes, 2010)

Fig. 11. PLC and Vacuum Pump control panels.

Fig. 8. DL06-AR PLC and DIN-AP3 home automation unit

Fig. 12. System setup.

Student Project

Symposium

June 2016

Fig. 10. HMI Screens and Alarms