ODOT/FHWA Stewardship Oversight Committee Meeting

Gary Bowling (ODOT) and Tim Rogers (FHWA)

May 29, 2012

Bridge Program Performance Measure Overview

Bridge Program Area

FHWA Lead – Tim Rogers ODOT Lead – Bruce Johnson “Bridge” Performance and Compliance

Indicators address the following: Performance Indicators1 &2: Bridge

Condition Compliance Indicators 3 thru 5: Bridge

Inspection Performance Indicators 6 & 7: Bridge

Maintenance

Bridge Condition Performance Indicators

1. Percent of NHS bridges rated structurally and functionally deficient as measured by deck area

2. Percent of Non-NHS bridges rated structurally and functionally deficient as measured by deck area

Structurally Deficient = Structural Components are in “Poor” or worse condition or the “Structural Evaluation” or “Waterway Adequacy” is intolerable.

Functionally Deficient = Deck geometry, load carrying capacity, clearance, or approach roadway alignment no longer meets the criteria for the system.

Bridge Condition Performance Indicators

1. Percent of NHS Bridge Deck area rated structurally and functionally deficient

Bridge Condition Performance Indicators

2. Percent of Non-NHS Bridge Deck area rated structurally and functionally deficient

Bridge Inspection Program Compliance Indicators

3. Percent of routine bridge inspections completed within the established bridge inspection cycle

24 month inspection cycle

4. Percent of fracture critical bridge inspections completed within the established bridge inspection cycle

24 month inspection cycle

5. Percent of underwater bridge inspections completed within the established bridge inspection cycle

60 month inspection cycle

Bridge Inspection Program Compliance Indicators

Percent of bridge inspections completed within the established bridge inspection cycle3. Routine Inspections

4. Fracture Critical

5. Underwater

2010 96.7%

2010 86.1%

2010 99.7%

Bridge Maintenance Performance Indicators

6. Number of “urgent” maintenance recommendations not resolved after 12 months

Needs to be repaired ASAP to address a specific traffic safety concern.

Structural component rated in Poor Condition

7. Number of “critical” maintenance recommendations not resolved after 12 months

Needs to be repaired to prevent structure from being load posted.

Structural Component rated in Serious Condition

Bridge Maintenance Performance Indicators

6. Number of Urgent maintenance recommendations not resolved after 12 months

7. Number of Critical maintenance recommendations not resolved after 12 months

Year State Bridges Local Bridges

2011 134 605

2010 252 656

Year State Bridges Local Bridges

2011 2 2

2010 2 4

2009 2 3

Future Changes to Bridge Program Performance Indicators?

Bridge Inspection Program Compliance Indicators Incorporate the results of the annual National Bridge

Inspection Program (NBIP) compliance reviews: % of NBIP Metrics in Satisfactory Performance Level % of NBIP Metrics in Actively Improving Performance Level % of NBIP Metrics in Unsatisfactory Performance Level

Delete the following:3. Percent of routine bridge inspections completed within

the established bridge inspection cycle4. Percent of fracture critical bridge inspections completed

within the established bridge inspection cycle5. Percent of underwater bridge inspections completed

within the established bridge inspection cycle

Future Changes to Bridge Program Performance Indicators?

Bridge Inspection Program Compliance Indicators

ODOT NBIP Performance Levels

Year Satisfactory

Actively Improving

Unsatisfactory

2011 20 3 0

Bridge Program Performance Measure Overview

Questions?