ocular motor deficits in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy
TRANSCRIPT
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Ocular motor deficits in oculopharyn-
geal muscular dystrophy
D. Gautiera, I. Penisson-Besnierb,
S. Rivaud-Pechouxc, C. Rabautea
and D. Mileaa,d
aDepartment of Ophtalmologie, Centre
Hospitalier Universitaire d�Angers;bDepartment of Neurologie, Centre de
reference des maladies neuromusculaires,
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d�Angers;cPierre et Marie Curie Universite Paris-6,
INSERM URMS 975, CNRS 7225, Paris,
France; and dDepartment of Ophthalmol-
ogy, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen
University, Denmark
Correspondence: D. Gautier, Department
of Ophtalmologie, Centre Hospitalier
Universitaire d�Angers, 4 rue Larrey,
49933 Angers Cedex 9, France (tel.:
+33241353274; fax: +33241354264;
e-mail: [email protected]).
Keywords: amplitudes of saccades,
ocular motility, oculopharyngeal muscular
dystrophy, saccades, speed of saccades
Received 6 September 2011
Accepted 12 December 2011
Sir,
Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy
(OPMD, MIM #164300) is a rare domi-
nantly inherited myopathy caused by a
short GCG-triplet expansion in the
poly(A) binding protein nuclear 1 gene
(PABPN1) [1]. Presenting signs, starting in
late adulthood, are slowly progressive
ptosis and dysphagia, with subsequent
possible involvement of other voluntary
muscles. Extraocular eye movements in
OPMD are to date poorly described [2].
The aim of this pilot study was to quantify
the ocular saccades in patients with
OPMD.
Subjects and methods
Eye movements of patients with geneti-
cally confirmed OPMD were recorded
using a new dedicated infrared video
oculography device (Mobile EyeBrain
Tracker, e(ye)BRAIN, Ivry-sur-Seine,
France, http://www.eye-brain.com). This
study, approved by the local ethics com-
mittee, was conducted in accordance with
the Declaration of Helsinki.
Characteristics of 20� horizontal sac-
cades (latency, amplitude, gain, and peak
velocity) of left and right eyes were
assessed using a horizontal pro-saccade
(gap) task both in the OPMD group and
in a matched healthy control group (28
volunteers, mean age 71.5 ± 11.8 years).
Because of ptosis, only horizontal
saccades were analyzed. Between-group
comparisons were made using the Mann–
Whitney U test, and P values <0.05 were
considered to be significant.
Results
Six patients with genetically confirmed
OPMD were included, four men and two
women (mean age 75 ± 12.3 years),
originating from five families. All were
heterozygous for the mutation, and the
mean size of GCG expansion was 9
(8–11). Age at referral ranged from 43 to
69 years (mean 57.5 years). The present-
ing symptoms were ptosis, dysphagia, or
limb weakness either in isolation or in
combination. Clinical ocular motor
examination was considered �within nor-
mal limits� by the referring neurologist, in
all included patients. The remainder of the
neuro-ophthalmic examination was nor-
mal. A various degree of proximal limb
weakness was found in five patients.
Horizontal saccades were significantly
slower in patients with OPMD than in
healthy controls (P = 0.00015). Latency,
amplitude, and gain showed no difference
between the two groups (Table 1).
Discussion
Various degrees of ocular motor involve-
ment in OPMD have been previously
described, but only on a clinical, qualita-
tive basis [3]. To the best of our knowl-
edge, no ocular motor study specifically
addressed this question in the past. Our
quantitative pilot study discloses a new
finding: reduced saccades speed, associ-
ated with totally preserved amplitude of
eye movements (explaining the normal
clinical examination). Because of the small
size of this pilot study, we could not
perform correlations between the change
in saccades speed and the progression of
the disease over time. The pathophysio-
logical explanation of the dissociation
between the impaired speed and the
normal amplitude of saccades remains
unclear, and further oculographic studies
should include patients with clinically
impaired eye movements.
References
1. Brais B, Bouchard J-P, Xie Y-G, et al. Short
GCG expansions in the PABP2 gene cause
oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy. Nat
Genet 1998; 18: 164–167.
2. Hill ME, Creed GA, McMullan TF, et al.
Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy:
phenotypic and genotypic studies in
a UK population. Brain 2001; 124: 522–526.
3. Bouchard JP, Brais B, Brunet D, Gould PV,
Rouleau GA. Recent studies on oculopha-
ryngeal muscular dystrophy in Quebec.
Neuromuscul Disord 1997; 7(Suppl. 1):
S22–S29.
Table 1 Saccade characteristics in the two groups
Latency (ms) Amplitude (�) Gain Vmax (�/s)
Patients (n = 6) 284 ± 59 19.5 ± 1.6 0.95 ± 0.04 291 ± 49
Controls (n = 28) 253 ± 56 19.9 ± 1.6 0.97 ± 0.06 505 ± 57
P value >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 0.00015
Latency, amplitude value, (Vmax) peak velocity, (Gain) accuracy. There was a significant
reduction of Vmax in patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy.
e38� 2012 The Author(s)
European Journal of Neurology � 2012 EFNS
European Journal of Neurology 2012, 19: e38 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03657.x