observing atmospheric winds with a doppler lidar

4
Observing atmospheric winds with a Doppler lidar By R. Michael Hardesty Madison J. Post, and Robert M. Banta Most lidar systems used for atmo- spheric probing (see the associated articles in this issue) measure the intensity of laser radiation backscattered from the atmosphere to provide information on param- eters such as aerosol structure, at- mospheric density, or trace spe- cies concentration. Doppler lidars are designed to measure the frequency as well as the intensity of backscattered radiation. By comparing the frequency of the backscattered radiation to that of the transmitted laser pulse, the fre- quency change due to the motion of the scatterers (Doppler shift) can be computed and used to infer the component of scatterer velocity along the line of sight of the lidar. Since the particles that effectively scatter laser light are very small (less than a few micrometers in diameter), they move with the wind; hence, measurement of the mean velocity of a volume of scatterers provides a measurement of the mean radial wind speed at the location of the scattering volume. Doppler lidar measurements of wind speeds have been used to provide new observations of a variety of important atmospheric phenomena. Early Doppler lidar systems, de- veloped in the late 1960s and early 1970s, employed con- tinuous wave (CW) carbon dioxide lasers to probe wind structure in, e.g., aircraft wake vortices 1 and dust devils. 2 However, CW Doppler lidar systems are limited to measure- ments within about 200 m of the lidar because range dis- crimination is carried out by changing the focus of the laser beam. Pulsed lidars, on the other hand, are able to measure range-resolved wind velocities to distances of several kilo- meters, making them much more versatile for atmospheric studies. At the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Wave Propagation Laboratory (WPL), we have employed a pulsed Doppler lidar in more than 20 observational cam- paigns, extending throughout the continental United States, as well as into Canada and Hawaii, since the instrument was first demonstrated in the early 1980s. During much of this period, the WPL system has been the only lidar of its kind available to the atmospheric research community. Doppler lidar observations have led to many new insights into mesoscale atmospheric phenomena, most notably in the planetary boundary layer and lower troposphere, where the wind field exhibits considerable spatial and temporal variability. By scanning the beam, the WPL lidar can obtain, with a 2-3 minute observation time, as many as 30,000 measurements of radial wind and backscattered signal intensity (which is directly related to atmospheric turbid- ity) over an area of nearly 3,000 square km. This has enabled studies of the structure and evolution of wind fields associated with, for example, thunderstorm outflows, 3 downslope windstorms, 4 drainage flows in complex ter- rain, 5 large forest fires, 6 and air quality degradation in urban basins. 7 Recently, Doppler lidar measurements have also been analyzed to provide information on the average mo- mentum flux and turbulence profiles in a convective bound- ary layer, 8 and on cirrus cloud physical and radiative prop- erties important to climate change studies. 9 How a Doppler lidar works As with other types of atmospheric lidars, a Doppler lidar operates by irradiating a segment of atmosphere with a pulse of laser radiation. As the pulse propagates through the atmosphere, a portion of the energy is scattered di- rectly back to the lidar by small (typically less than 3 µm diameter) aerosol particles suspended in the atmosphere (lidars operating at wavelengths below about 1 µm also receive significant energy scattered from atmospheric molecules as well as aerosols; molecular scattering is neg- ligible at 10.6 µm, the operating wavelength of most current Doppler lidars). The mean frequency of the backscattered radiation is Doppler shifted by δf = 2v/λ, where v is the component of mean wind velocity toward the lidar, and λis the wavelength. The radiation scattered by the aerosols is collected by the system receiver telescope and directed to the detector. To determine the frequency shift of the backscattered radiation, the NOAA lidar employs heterodyne (coherent) detection, in which the backscattered radiation is optically mixed with radiation from a local oscillator (LO) laser. The beat between the two optical signals produces an alternat- ing current signal in the detector current that is processed to determine the frequency shift resulting from wind-driven motion of the aerosols. In addition to making measurement of the backscattered 12 Optics & Photonics News October 1991 O R S A

Upload: robert-m

Post on 06-Oct-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Observing atmospheric winds with a Doppler lidar

Observing atmospheric winds with a Doppler lidar By R. Michael Hardesty Madison J. Post, and Robert M. Banta

Most l idar systems used for atmo­spher ic probing (see the associated art icles in this issue) measure the i n t e n s i t y of l a s e r r a d i a t i o n backscattered from the atmosphere to prov ide information on param­eters such as aerosol structure, at­mospher ic density, or t race spe­

cies concentrat ion. Doppler l idars are designed to measure the frequency as wel l as the intensity of backscattered radiat ion. By compar ing the frequency of the backscat tered radiat ion to that of the transmit ted laser pulse, the fre­quency change due to the mot ion of the scatterers (Doppler shift) can be computed and used to infer the component of scatterer ve loc i ty along the l ine of sight of the l idar. Since the part icles that effectively scatter laser light are very smal l (less than a few micrometers in diameter), they move wi th the wind; hence, measurement of the mean ve loc i ty of a vo lume of scatterers prov ides a measurement of the mean radial wind speed at the locat ion of the scatter ing vo lume.

Doppler l idar measurements of wind speeds have been used to prov ide new observat ions of a var iety of important atmospher ic phenomena. Ear ly Doppler l idar systems, de­veloped in the late 1960s and early 1970s, employed con­t inuous wave (CW) carbon d iox ide lasers to probe w ind structure in, e.g., aircraft wake vor t ices 1 and dust devi ls . 2

However, CW Doppler l idar systems are l imited to measure­ments wi th in about 200 m of the l idar because range dis­cr iminat ion is carr ied out by changing the focus of the laser beam. Pulsed l idars, on the other hand, are able to measure range-resolved wind veloci t ies to distances of several ki lo­meters, making them much more versat i le for atmospher ic studies.

At the National Oceanic and Atmospher ic Administrat ion's Wave Propagat ion Laboratory (WPL) , we have employed a pulsed Doppler l idar in more than 20 observat ional cam­paigns, extending throughout the cont inental Uni ted States, as wel l as into Canada and Hawai i , s ince the instrument was first demonstrated in the early 1980s. Dur ing much of this per iod, the W P L system has been the only l idar of its k ind available to the atmospher ic research communi ty . Doppler l idar observat ions have led to many new insights into mesoscale atmospher ic phenomena, most notably in the

planetary boundary layer and lower t roposphere, where the wind f ield exhibi ts considerable spat ial and temporal var iabi l i ty. By scanning the beam, the W P L l idar can obtain, wi th a 2-3 minute observat ion t ime, as many as 30,000 measurements of radial w ind and backscat tered signal intensity (which is d i rect ly related to atmospher ic turbid­ity) over an area of nearly 3,000 square km. This has enabled studies of the structure and evolut ion of w ind fields associated wi th, for example, thunderstorm outf lows, 3

downslope windstorms, 4 drainage flows in complex ter­ra in, 5 large forest f ires, 6 and air qual i ty degradat ion in urban basins. 7 Recently, Doppler l idar measurements have also been analyzed to prov ide information on the average mo­mentum flux and turbulence profi les in a convect ive bound­ary layer, 8 and on c i r rus c loud phys ica l and radiat ive prop­erties important to cl imate change studies. 9

How a Doppler lidar works As wi th other types of atmospher ic l idars, a Doppler l idar operates by i rradiat ing a segment of atmosphere wi th a pulse of laser radiat ion. As the pulse propagates through the atmosphere, a por t ion of the energy is scattered di ­rect ly back to the l idar by smal l ( typical ly less than 3 µm diameter) aerosol part ic les suspended in the atmosphere ( l idars operat ing at wavelengths below about 1 µm also receive signif icant energy scat tered f rom atmospher ic molecules as wel l as aerosols; molecular scatter ing is neg­l igible at 10.6 µm, the operat ing wavelength of most current Doppler l idars). The mean frequency of the backscattered radiat ion is Doppler shifted by δf = 2 v / λ , where v is the component of mean wind veloc i ty toward the l idar, and λ is the wavelength.

The radiat ion scattered by the aerosols is col lected by the system receiver te lescope and d i rected to the detector. To determine the frequency shift of the backscattered radiat ion, the N O A A l idar employs heterodyne (coherent) detect ion, in wh i ch the backscat tered radiat ion is opt ical ly mixed wi th radiat ion from a loca l osci l la tor (LO) laser. The beat between the two opt ical signals produces an alternat­ing current signal in the detector current that is processed to determine the frequency shift result ing from wind-dr iven mot ion of the aerosols.

In addi t ion to making measurement of the backscattered

12 Optics & Photonics News October 1991

O R S A

Page 2: Observing atmospheric winds with a Doppler lidar

signal f requency possib le, heterodyne detect ion greatly improves sensit iv i ty in the 10 µm spectra l region by en­abl ing the receiver to operate in a quantum-noise-l imited mode (the quantum noise produced by the local osci l la tor field dominates other noise sources) . This is a signif icant advantage at 10 µm, where photon energies are low and thermal noise is considerable even when detectors are coo led. At 10 µm, heterodyne detect ion can improve sensi­t ivity by as much as 30 dB over incoherent detect ion.

Doppler l idar systems incorporat ing Fabry-Perot etalons for incoherent determinat ion of Doppler shift at shorter wavelengths have been used recent ly for t ropospher ic and stratospheric w ind prof i l ing. 1 0 - 1 2 A l though such systems also require extremely stable laser transmitters, the need for a local osci l lator laser is el iminated. A n example of such a system is descr ibed elsewhere in this issue by Ab reu see page 28).

Design characteristics of a Doppler lidar system In general, a Doppler l idar system is considerably more complex than an incoherent l idar system, wh ich does not attempt to measure phase information in the backscattered signal. Doppler l idar design constraints focus on two cr i t ical issues: ensuring sufficient system frequency stabil i ty to enable measurement of the Doppler shift and maximizing system sensitivity. To minimize frequency uncertainties, a Doppler l idar transmitter is typical ly frequency-locked to a stable CW local osci l lator laser, operates on a single longitu­dinal mode, and produces a pulse wi th good spectral puri ty (low chirp, single transverse mode, narrow bandwidth).

Whi le incoherent l idars usual ly operate with' very short pulses for good range resolut ion, the requirement for a narrow pulse bandwidth l imits the achievable range resolu­t ion of a Doppler system. Roughly, the bandwidth of the laser pulse due to pulse durat ion (which determines range

resolut ion), ch i rp , and f requency instabi l i ty effects should be less than 2σv/λ where σv is the desi red uncertainty in the ve loc i ty measurement. In a 10 µm Doppler system, the shortest laser pulse length that can be used is about 1 us; this l imits range resolut ion to about 150 m. The range resolut ion constraint suggests an advantage for operat ion at shorter wavelengths.

The other key heterodyne l idar issue, sensit iv i ty, is a st rong funct ion of the eff iciency of the coherent mixing process on the detector. For diffuse or rough (i.e., speckle) a tmospher ic targets such as aerosol part ic les, best perfor­mance is achieved when the diameter of the laser beam at the target is min imized, s ince part ial coherence theory shows that min imiz ing incident spot size results in a scat­tered field at the receiver wi th the largest lateral coherence (which gives the most usable signal). Therefore, the laser output pulse shou ld be capable of being focussed to its dif fract ion l imit at the target (the W P L system typical ly is operated wi th the transmit ted beam col l imated, wh ich maximizes performance at more distant ranges in the far f ield, where signal is general ly lowest). Good s ignal /LO matching at the detector is also important: this requires the LO beam cross-sect ional prof i le to be matched to the trans­mitter pulse prof i le, and the LO phase fronts to be precisely al igned wi th those of the backscat tered radiat ion for opt i­mum performance.

M u c h effort has gone into improv ing sensi t iv i ty of the N O A A / W P L l idar (a schemat ic is shown in Figure 1) and understanding the relative effect of each parameter that impacts performance. Details on opt imizat ion of the sys­tem is prov ided in Post et al.13 The heart Of the system is the injection-seeded T E A C O 2 laser, wh i ch produces pulses wi th more than 1 J of energy at pulse rates up to 30 Hz. Frequency stabi l i ty of the l idar is accompl ished wi th three servo loops: one to maintain the inject ion laser on line center, one to match the T E A laser cavi ty resonance to the inject ion laser frequency, and one to maintain the local osci l lator laser f requency at a constant offset (20 MHz) from that of the inject ion osci l lator.

For ease of alignment, a single Mersenne (parabola-pa­rabola) te lescope wi th a 28 c m diameter pr imary mir ror is used for both transmit t ing and receiv ing; polar izat ion rota­t ion is employed to swi tch the transmit and receiver beams. Other important components of the system include a com­puter-control led scanner and a real-time processor and display. The entire l idar is mounted in a semi-trai ler for easy transport to distant si tes. Typica l ly , only 1/2 day is required to ready the l idar for measurements fol lowing arr ival at a field site.

The N O A A l idar can measure winds to hor izonta l ranges of 30 km, al though day-to-day performance can vary cons id­erably as a funct ion of a tmospher ic aerosol content and relat ive humidi ty (water vapor cont inuum absorpt ion is non-negligible in the 10 µm spectra l region). Accuracy of a radial w ind measurement is approximately 0.5 m s - 1 for estimates obtained f rom three pulse averages (the normal operat ing mode). Range resolut ion is either 150 or 300 m,

FIGURE 1 SCHEMATIC OF THE NOAA WAVE PROPAGATION

LABORATORY PULSED CO2 DOPPLER LIDAR TRANS­CEIVER, SHOWING SERVO CONTROL LOOPS NECES­

SARY FOR FREQUENCY STABILITY.

October 1991 Optics & Photonics News 1 3

Page 3: Observing atmospheric winds with a Doppler lidar

depending on the pulse length employed. In addition to estimates of radial velocity, the signal processor computes real-time measurements of backscattered signal intensity and spectral width, displays the results in several display formats, and stores all data on magnetic tape.

Application of the lidar for atmospheric winds measurement Use of the WPL lidar has evolved considerably during its nearly 10-year existence. Initially, the system was most commonly used in field experiments to measure real-time vertical profiles of the horizontal wind 1 4 to the mid- or upper troposphere. Because the measurements could be produced about every three minutes, lidar observations were much better than those from balloons for observing changing tropospheric wind structure. With the develop­ment of radar wind profilers,1 5 which produce wind profiles under nearly all meteorological conditions to heights of 15 km, we have shifted our emphasis toward characterizing phenomena where the wind fields exhibit high spatial and temporal variability.

Some of the our significant results have been obtained in observations of mountain, valley, and canyon flows. For example, during the 1985 Brush Creek experiment7 (part of the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Science in Com­plex Terrain Project), the lidar was used to measure cross-sections of the nocturnal drainage flow field at 300 m intervals along a 25 km length of a 1 km wide mountain valley. At least twice per hour, wind measurements at 20,000 points spread over a region of approximately 100 km 2 and extending to a height of 2500 m were obtained. By continuing the measurements for 12 hours, from dusk to dawn, we were able to use the data to observe evolution of the drainage flow, formation and spatial variation of the drainage jet, and down-valley changes in mass flux. This is one measurement scenario in which the Doppler lidar provided orders of magnitude more information than would have been obtained by conventional meteorological ob­serving tools. Typically, wind measurements in such stud­ies are obtained from tethered balloons or Doppler acous­tic sounders; one lidar scan provided the equivalent of thousands of balloon or acoustic sounder measurements.

The Brush Creek complex terrain study was a precursor to the application of the Doppler lidar in January 1990 to measure flows in some of the most complex of all terrain— the bottom of the Grand Canyon. 1 6 In this experiment, the lidar observed wind flows below the rim of the Grand Canyon as part of a regional-scale study to determine the extent to which the Navajo Generating Station at Page, Ariz., was affecting visibility in Grand Canyon National Park. From a vantage point on the canyon rim, the instru­ment measured the three-dimensional structure of down-canyon winds and aerosol from the canyon floor to above the rim. The color figure onthe cover shows a lidar-mea­sured cross-section of the winds within the canyon, where color denotes the speed of the along-canyon flow. Signifi­

cant spatial variability of the wind field can be seen, as well as a shift in wind direction at the canyon rim. By combining lidar measurements of below-rim winds, which provide information on the direct flow from Page to the Canyon, with measurements from other sources such as balloons and wind profilers, the relative contributions of the Navajo station compared to Phoenix and Los Angeles, for example, are being assessed.

One potentially important application of Doppler lidar is still evolving: detecting microbursts (regions of intense downdrafts) generated by thunderstorms, which have been implicated in several recent air crashes. Although lidar systems are not effective in penetrating convective clouds or regions of heavy rain, so-called "dry" microbursts—in which the region of strong downdrafts does not contain precipitation—have been observed with the WPL Doppler lidar. Dry microbursts are often difficult to detect with Doppler radars (the traditional instrument for thunder­storm surveillance) because of the absence of effective radar scatterers and because microbursts can occur near the surface where they are masked by radar ground clutter. The demonstrated capability of Doppler lidar for wind shear detection makes the technique a potential comple­ment to radars for ground-based wind shear detection. Currently, a research effort is also underway to assess the utility of an aircraft-mounted Doppler lidar for on-board wind shear detection.1 7

Because Doppler lidar measures only the radial compo­nent of the wind, quantitative interpretation of information from lidar scans can sometimes be difficult. Often, how­ever, assumptions on the properties of the wind flow can be used to extract additional information. Figure 2 shows the

FIGURE 2 FLOW IN THE VICINITY OF A FOREST FIRE DERIVED

FROM DOPPLER LIDAR OBSERVATIONS BY ASSUMING RADIAL SYMMETRY OF THE WIND FIELD AND APPLYING MASS CONTINUITY CONSTRAINTS.

14 Optics & Photonics News October 1991

Page 4: Observing atmospheric winds with a Doppler lidar

estimated flow in the region of a prescribed forest burn in Ontario, Canada, computed from lidar returns. To estimate two-dimensional winds from the field of radial measure­ments, the analysis assumed radial symmetry of the wind field and applied mass continuity constraints beginning at the surface and extending to 3 km. The resulting wind field agrees well with predictions by mesoscale models of wind flow in the vicinity of a strong heat source.

More information on Doppler lidar applications, includ­ing measurements of turbulence fluxes, free atmosphere aerosol backscatter climatology,18 water vapor,19 and diur­nal variation in sea breeze properties20 can be obtained from the references. A fairly comprehensive bibliography of references related to coherent lidar is presented by Menzies and Hardesty.21

Anticipated developments Although the WPL pulsed CO2 lidar continues to be in demand for a variety of atmospheric studies, work is pro­ceeding on several fronts toward new lidar systems with unique measurement capabilities. We are completing a compact CO2 coherent system designed to probe rapidly-changing phenomena in the planetary boundary layer.22

This new lidar incorporates radio-frequency (RF) excita­tion to produce pulses of about 10 mJ at pulse repetition rates of as high as 10 KHz. Because the RF technology will permit long-term, sealed-off operation, it is hoped that this lidar can be the basis for an unattended instrument that operates without the "tender loving care" required by most current lidars.

To date, almost all coherent lidars used for atmospheric studies have employed CO2 lasers as the system transmit­ter. One of the more exciting advancements in recent years is the emergence of solid state lasers of yttrium-aluminum garnet (YAG) doped with neodymium, holmium, thulium, and/or chromium, that are suitable for coherent lidar sys­tems.23 In addition to the potential benefits relating to compactness and reliability (the lasers can be pumped by diode lasers), operation at shorter wavelengths gives im­proved range resolution over CO2 Doppler systems. At WPL, we are developing a solid state Doppler lidar to operate near 2.1 µm for high spatial and temporal resolu­tion atmospheric probing from surface, shipboard, and aircraft platforms.

To date, Doppler lidars have operated on surface or aircraft platforms in mesoscale research applications. How­ever, NASA has under development a space-based Doppler lidar—the Laser Atmospheric Wind Sounder (LAWS)24— that will provide measurements of wind fields on global scales from an Earth Observing System (EOS) platform.22

The LAWS instrument will include a laser of approximately 20 J per pulse and telescope of 1.5 m diameter to produce measurements of winds throughout much of the tropo­sphere. The lidar measurements of global wind fields and cloud climatologies (the space-based instrument will easily detect and measure the height of cloud tops) will aid

numerical weather forecasting, as well as provide new data on important phenomena such as the global hydrological cycle, planetary scale dynamics, boundary layer structure, and transport of trace gases and aerosols.

References 1. R .M. Huffaker et al., "Laser Dopp ler sys tem for detect ion of aircraft t ra i l ing

vor t ices , " P roc . IEEE 58, 1970, 322-326. 2. R.L. Schwiesow and R.E. Cupp , "Remote Dopp le r ve loc i ty measurements of

a tmospher ic dust dev i l vor t ices , " A p p l . Opt . 15, 1976, 1-2. 3. J . M . Intrieri et al., "Detai ls of co l l id ing thunders torm outf lows as observed

by Dopp ler l idar," J . A tmos . Sci . 47, 1081-1098. 4. P.J . Ne iman et al., "Dopp ler l idar observat ion of a downs lope w inds torm,"

M o n t h . Weath . Rev. 45 2265-2275. 5. M.J . Post and W.D. Neff, "Dopp ler l idar measurements of w inds in a nar row

mounta in val ley," Bu l l . A m . Meteoro lo l . Soc. 67 274-281. 6. R .M. Banta et al., "Dopp ler l idar observat ions of a rotat ing convect ive

smoke co lumn, " Proc . , 11th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteoro logy, M issou la , Mont. , 1991 (in press) .

7. W.D. Neff, "Remote sens ing of a tmospher ic processes over complex terra in," in A tmospher i c Processes Over Comp lex Ter ra in , W . B lumen, ed. , Amer i can Meteoro log ica l Society, Bos ton , Mass. , 1990, 173-228.

8. W.L. Eberhard et a l . , " Dopp le r l idar measurement of prof i les of turbu lence and momentum flux," J . A tmos . and Ocean. Tech . , 28 809-819.

9. J . M . Intrieri et al., "Determinat ion of c i r rus c loud part ic le effective radi i us ing radar and l idar backscat ter ing data, " Prepr in ts , 25th International Conference on Radar Meteoro logy, Par is , France, 1991 ( in press) .

10. V . J . A b r e u et al., "Observat ions of w inds wi th an incoherent laser detec­tor," A p p l . Opt . (in press) .

11. M.L. Chan in et al., " A Dopp le r l idar for measur ing winds in the midd le a tmosphere, Geophy . Res. Let. 16, 1989, 1273.

12. C.L. K o r b and B . M . Gentry, "The edge technique for l idar measurements of a tmospher ic w inds, " Abst rac ts of Papers, Fifteenth International Laser Radar Conference, Tomsk , USSR, 1990, 265-266.

13. M.J . Post and R.E. Cupp , "Opt imiz ing a pu lsed Dopp ler l idar," A p p l . Opt. 29, 1990, 4145-4158.

14. F.F. Ha l l et al., "W ind measurement accu racy of the N O A A pu lsed Dopp ler infrared l idar," A p p l . Opt. 23 1984, 2503-2506.

15. R.G. St rauch et al., "The prec is ion and relat ive accuracy of prof i ler w ind measurements," J . A tmos . and Ocean. T e c h . 4, 1987, 563-571.

16. R .M. Banta and L.D. Ol iv ier , "Dopp ler l idar observat ions of air flow in the Grand Canyon , " Proceedings, 84th Annua l Meet ing A i r and Waste Manage­ment Assoc ia t ion , Vancouver , B.C., 1991 ( in press) .

17. R. Targ and R. Bowles, "Coherent l idar a i rborne shear sensor (CLASS)" , Proceedings, Fifth Conference on Coherent Laser Radar, M u n i c h , FRG, 1989, 41-44.

18. M.J. Post , "A tmospher i c purging of E l Ch ichon Debr is " , J . Geophys . Res. 91, 1986, 5222-5228.

19. R .M. Hardesty, "Coherent DIAL measurement of range-resolved water vapo r concent ra t ion" , A p p l . Opt . 23, 1984, 2545-2553.

20. J . M . Intrieri et al., "The land/sea breeze exper iment (LASBEX) , Bu l l . Amer . Meteoro l . Soc. 71, 1990, 656-664.

21. R.T. Menz ies and R.M. Hardesty, "Coherent Dopp le r l idar for measure­ments of w ind f ields," P roc . IEEE 77, 1989, 449 -462 .

22. G.N. Pearson, "The design and per formance character is t ics of a compact CO2 Dopp le r l idar t ransmit ter," Proceedings SPIE ( in press) .

23. T .J . Kane et a l . , "Coherent laser radar at 1.06 µm using N d : Y A G lasers," Opt. Lett. 12, 1971, 239-.

24. L A W S (Laser A tmospher i c W ind Sounder) Instrument Panel Report , Ear th Observ ing System, Vo lume IIg, Washington, D. C., NASA, 1987.

R. Michael Hardesty, Madison J. Post, and Robert M. Banta are with the NOAA/ERL Wave Propagation Laboratory in Boulder, Colo.

October 1991 Opt ics & Photon ics News 15