non-point source pollutant modeling
DESCRIPTION
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling. Analysis and Prediction David Munn. Non-Point Source Pollution. Does not come from a single source Results from pollutants being washed out of large areas during storms Difficult to model without use of GIS or current NPSP models. Goals. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling
Analysis and Prediction
David Munn
Non-Point Source Pollution
Does not come from a single source Results from pollutants being washed out of
large areas during storms Difficult to model without use of GIS or
current NPSP models
Goals
Predicting pollutant runoff loads Defining problem areas within the
Watershed Determine what factors effect pollutant
loading Determine streams with highest impact Pollutants considered:
BOD Suspended Solids
Total Phosphorous
Total Nitrogen
Study Area
Brazos County Buffered boundary
Process Overview
Gather data Data preparation
Reproject grids and shapefiles Clip themes and set analysis extents
Calculate curve numbers Delineate watersheds Calculate pollutant contribution Determine weighted accumulation Analyze data
Data/ThemesDEM
TNRISSoil Classification
STATSGO County Boundaries
ESRI, Tiger filesLand Use/Land Cover
Txdata, Provided by Dr. Olivera
PrecipitationTxdata, Annual and Monthly
LULC Pollutant Contribution DataCornell University Hydraulics Study
Reprojecting
Reprojected grids using ArcInfo-Workstation Reprojected geographic shapefiles using
CRWR-Vector Data Already in a Projection was reprojected
using ArcCatalog Final Projection: State Plane 1927
Central Texas, Zone 5376 Units = feet
Delineating Watersheds
CRWR-Prepro Burned in Streams Filled Sinks Determined Flow
Direction Determined Flow
Accumulation Defined Streams Segmented Streams Defined Outlets Delineated Watersheds Vectorized Grids
Curve Numbers
Used to determine runoff STATSGO data spatially documents soil
types (component makeup) Scripts provided by CVEN 689 Website
Soilgrp script – calculates % of hydrologic groups per soil type
cn script – creates curve numbers based on soil composition
Run-off
Rainfall given per month (January)
Calculate Run-off (mm) using SCS method Map Calculator
combined formulas with rainfall and CN
Created new grid giving run-off depth per cell
Pollutant Contributions
Q (mm)
Pollutant Concentration (mg/l)
Cell size (ft2)
= Mass (mg)
* Map Calculator
Pollutant Flow/Accumulation
Weighted flow accumulation Executed in ArcInfo Assigns weights to cells based on a Grid
.5 1.0 2.0
1.0 .5 1.0
.75 1.5 1.5
.5 .5 1.0
1.0 .5 1.0
.75 1.0 .5
Weights Direction Accumulation
Analysis
Determine what land-uses and soil types contribute the largest amount of pollutants
Determine what rivers suffer the greatest impact
Locate areas that contribute large masses of pollutants
Land Use Relationships (Zonal Summaries)
Soil Type Relationships(Zonal Summaries)
Impacted Rivers
Method Map query Changed to shapefile
Results too dependent on general accumulation
More statistical work needed
* BOD / SS* TP / TN
Areas of Concern
Conclusions
Urban areas contributed the largest mass of BOD and suspended solids per unit area
Agricultural areas contributed the largest mass of Nitrogen and Phosphorous / area
Rivers > 700,000 cell accumulation were impacted Soil types differed in impact between pollutants
Nutrients:
Crocket-Luling-Benchley & Zack-Zulch-Booneville BOD and Suspended Solids
Zack-Zulch-Booneville
Future Applications
Determining Pollutant Concentrations Calculate run-off volume using weighted
accumulation Sum run-off volumes with base flows Calculate in-stream concentrations
Better Statistical Analyis of Impacted Rivers
Problems
REPROJECTING!!!!!!! Calculating pollutant contributions
(map calculator) Floating point analysis
QUESTIONS
What up?