non-motor symptoms in early drug-naïve parkinson’s disease · non-motor symptoms in early...
TRANSCRIPT
Results
Non-motor symptoms in early drug-naïve Parkinson’s disease
Rui Liu1, David M. Umbach2, Shyamal D. Peddada2, Zongli Xu1, Alexander I. Tröster3, Xuemei Huang4, Honglei Chen1
1.Epidemiology Branch and 2.Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC. 3.Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ. 4.Department of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University-Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.
PD cases performed substantially worse than controls on nearly all NMS measurements
Male and female PD patients were comparable on motor presentations
Notable sex differences observed for several non-motor features: o Male PD patients experienced more pronounced
deficits in olfaction and several cognitive domains o Female cases had much higher trait anxiety
Similar but smaller sex differences in cognition among controls
A few of these NMS, sense of smell in particular, could effectively differentiate newly diagnosed PD cases from controls o Previous data suggest that the loss of the sense of
smell is among the earliest NMS for PD o Potential predictive values of these symptoms should
be further investigated in longitudinal studies of individual without PD
Conclusions
Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients suffer from a wide array of non-motor symptoms (NMS)
o Prevalent and difficult to treat o Related to poor quality of life, higher morbidity
and mortality
Some NMS may precede PD clinical diagnosis
o May help early case identification and differential diagnosis
Previous data suggest sex difference in PD incidence and possibly progression and risk factors
o No studies look into potential gender differences of NMS in newly diagnosed, untreated PD patients
Introduction
To examine potential sex differences in the presence of NMS in de novo PD patients
Identify patterns of NMS that can best differentiate early PD cases from controls
Objectives
Quantile regression model to assess potential sex-
differences in NMS among PD patients and controls
Stepwise logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to identify NMS that can best differentiate de novo PD cases from controls
All analyses stratified by gender
Statistical Analyses
The Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) study
o 414 de novo, drug-naïve PD patients: • Asymmetric resting tremor or asymmetric
bradykinesia • Diagnosed within two years • Hoehn and Yahr stage I or II • Age 30 years or older at diagnosis • Evidence of dopamine transporter deficit • Untreated for PD
o 188 healthy controls: • Free of neurological disorder • No first-degree relative with PD • No evidence of dopamine transporter deficit • MoCA score >26
NMS assessments
o 12 validated tests and structured questionnaires to examine 5 major areas of non-motor feature: sleep, olfaction, neurobehavioral and autonomic disturbances, and cognitive domains
Methods
PD Patients Healthy Controls
Male (n=269)
Female (n=145)
P a
Male (n=121)
Female (n=67)
P a
Pinteraction
Sleep Disorder Epworth sleepiness scale 6 (3-8) 5 (3-8) 0.4 5 (3-8) 5 (3-7) 0.7 0.95
RBDSQ 4 (2-6) 3 (2-5) 0.2 2 (1-4) 2 (1-4) 1.0 0.39
Olfactory
UPSIT 22 (15-28) 24 (19-31) 0.02 35 (32-37) 36 (34-38) 0.3 0.45 Neurobehavioral
Total anxiety 60 (50-75) 64 (53-76) 0.1 52 (46-64) 54 (45-69) 0.4 0.81
State anxiety 31 (24-38) 31 (25-40) 1.0 25 (21-33) 26 (21-33) 0.9 1.00
Trait anxiety 29 (25-36) 32 (27-40) 0.02 26 (24-32) 29 (23-35) 0.5 0.50
Geriatric depression 2 (1-3) 2 (1-3) 1.0 1 (0-1) 1 (0-2) 1.0 1.00
Cognitive Domains
Global 27 (26-29) 28 (26-29) 0.0008 28 (27-29) 28 (27-29) 0.5 0.06
Memory 46 (41-52) 51 (43-56) 0.0003 50 (43-55) 54 (48-57) 0.0007 0.83
Visuospatial 60 (55-67) 56 (47-61) <.0001 61 (56-67) 56 (50-62) 0.002 0.80 Working Memory-Executive 53 (48-58) 53 (49-57) 0.7 53 (49-58) 54 (50-60) 0.4 0.73
Attention-Processing Speed 45 (39-49) 47 (41-52) 0.3 49 (43-55) 52 (45-58) 0.04 0.27
Autonomic
SCOPA-AUT 8 (5-12) 9 (6-12) 0.2 5 (3-7) 6 (4-9) 0.002 0.16
a Based on quantile regression adjusted for age and education; P for interactions are between sex and enrollment-category.
Table 2. Medians and interquartile range of NMS scores by sex in patients and controls
A. Men B. Women
Significant NMSa
predictors
Regression coefficient
Standard error
P
UPSIT -3.097 0.49 <.0001 RBDSQ 0.646 0.25 0.01 MoCA -0.582 0.28 0.04 a All NMS variables were standardized to z-scores.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics
PD Patients
Male (n=269)
Female (n=145)
P a
Age, y 62 61 0.1
Race (% white) 94 92 0.6
Education, y 16 15 0.2
Disease duration, mo 6 7 0.5
Tremor at diagnosis, (%) 78 78 1.0
Rigidity at diagnosis, (%) 80 69 0.01
Bradykinesia at diagnosis, (%) 84 81 0.5
Postural instability at diagnosis, (%)
7 7 0.9
Family history of PD, (%) 15 10 0.1
UPDRS Part III score 21 20 0.6
Hoehn and Yahr stage, median 2 2 0.8
Healthy Controls
Male (n=121)
Female (n=67)
P
Age, y 62 60 0.2
Race (% white) 95 93 0.4
Education, y 16 15 0.1 a Based on Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the ROC curve (AUC) of NMS assessments for men (A) and women (B)
AUC=0.919 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95) AUC=0.903 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95)
Significant NMSa
predictors
Regression coefficient
Standard error
P
UPSIT -2.353 0.29 <.0001 SCOPA-AUT 1.059 0.28 0.0001 MoCA -0.536 0.23 0.022 a All NMS variables were standardized to z-scores.