nirb prehearing conference pond inlet and igloolik, nunavut mark dahl

Environment Canada Presentation to Nunavut Impact

Review Board Regarding Baffinland Mary

River Project

NIRB Prehearing ConferencePond Inlet and Igloolik, NunavutMark DahlEnvironmental Assessment Coordinator Prairie and Northern RegionEnvironment CanadaNovember, 2011

Outline

• EC Mandate

• How EC Fulfills its Mandate

• EC Role in Nunavut

• EC Role in Review of the Mary River Project

• Summary of Unresolved Issues

EC Mandate (http://www.ec.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=BD3CE17D-1)

• Department of the Environment Act general responsibility for environmental management and

protection;

• Preserve and enhance water, air and soil quality;

• Conserve Canada's renewable resources: migratory birds, flora and fauna;

• Conserve and protect Canada's water resources;

• Provide meteorological information;

• Coordinate environmental policies and programs.

How EC Fulfills its Mandate

Relevant Acts and Regulations: • Canadian Environmental Protection Act

air quality spill contingency planning waste management

• Fisheries Act Section 36(3) water quality

• Migratory Birds Convention Act

• Species at Risk Act

EC Role in Nunavut

Environment Canada:

• Screens and reviews development proposals for environmental impacts falling within its mandate

• Provides recommendations and expert advice to the Nunavut Impact Review Board and Nunavut Water Board

EC Role in Mary River Review

To date, EC has provided recommendations and advice related to:

Air Quality Water Quality Migratory Birds Species at Risk Waste Management Environmental Emergency and Spill Contingency

Planning

EC’s Main Concerns

• Potential Impacts from year-round shipping

• Further baseline data should be collected to ensure: Wildlife Mitigation and Monitoring Plans are thorough and

scientifically defensible, Impact predictions can be confirmed Potential impacts can be identified early and mitigated

• Comprehensive monitoring needed to address gaps in baseline knowledge, detect project-related impacts and inform adaptive management

Resolved Issues

• Majority of issues raised in EC’s technical submission have been resolved

• Examples of resolved issues include… Modelling (Ship emissions, climate change and ice regimes) Migratory birds – data presentation, monitoring, avoidance of key areas Freshwater discharge quality predictions Marine Impacts – chronic discharges, ballast water, propeller wash

• Resolution… Baffinland committed to provide requested information or adopt

requested approaches

Resolved Issues

• EC 4.2(b) Disturbance / Displacement of Birds at the Port Sites Baffinland commited to conduct eider nest surveys in 2012

• EC 4.6 Contamination from Chronic Ship Discharges, EC 4.7 Ballast Water Discharge Monitoring, EC 4.9 Propeller Wash Impacts

Committed to consider water and sediment quality as well as benthic and pelagic organisms in the Environmental Effects Monitoring framework.

Committed to selecting suitable monitoring targets and appropriate early warning indicators

• EC 4.8 Assessment of Wake Effects Committed to include coastal foraging and nesting habitat where data

exists

• EC 7.2 Need for Wildlife Protection in Spill Contingency planning Committed to include outstanding items

Potentially Resolved Issues

• Discussions between Baffinland, EC and other agencies have been initiated to address gaps in baseline data and to work on the design of monitoring programs

• Some outstanding issues may be resolved as discussions progress

Outstanding Issues

• Shipping Minimizing Ship Based Emissions While in Transit Ship Wakes

• Discharges to Marine Environment Discharge Quality Predictions

• Freshwater Baseline & Reference

• Monitoring Study Design

• Emergency Response Risk Assessment

Shipping – Related to EC 3.1 Air Quality

• Recommendation… Use low sulphur fuel in project ships while in Canadian waters

• Goal… To minimize ship emissions and emission related impacts while in transit To ensure project related shipping conforms to emission standards that apply in

the south

• Baffinland Position… Will obey applicable regulations

• Notes… Shipping route is not in Emission Control Area (ECA). Ships during transport are the largest sources air emissions for this project.

• Timeline: FEIS

Proposed ECA Boundary

Shipping EC 4.8 a(i) Wake Impacts

• Recommendation… Model the expected vessel wake from ore carriers based on

speed, distance from shore and water depth

• Goal… To improve understanding of ship wakes in order to inform

adaptive management decisions

• Baffinland Position… Not addressed in Baffinland commitments.

• Timeline: FEIS

Shipping – EC 4.8 (b) Wake Impacts

• Recommendation… Adjust the shipping route and vessel speed to ensure wake

height is less than natural mean wave height

• Goal… To protect migratory bird nesting, foraging and staging habitat

from ship wakes.

• Baffinland Position… Not addressed in Proponent commitments.

• Timeline: FEIS

Marine Discharge Predictions - EC 4.15

• Recommendation… Provide equation(s) and raw data used to predict

concentrations of water quality parameters in wastewater effluent and runoff from ore stockpiles in Steensby Inlet.

• Goal… Allow EC to verify quality predictions for effluent discharging

into Steensby Inlet.

• Baffinland… Not addressed in Baffinland commitments.

• Timeline: FEIS

Freshwater Baseline & Reference – EC 5.1; Monitoring Study Design

• Recommendation… Provide a framework for aquatic monitoring Select and sample appropriate reference sites prior to construction. Provide measures that will be employed to prevent project related work

from impacting baseline or reference site sampling

• Goal… Ensure adequate sampling has been completed prior to development, To ensure project-related changes can be detected


• Timeline: FEIS

Freshwater Baseline & Reference – EC 5.1; Monitoring Study Design

• Recommendation… Increase coverage of baseline sampling along rail alignment

prior to quarrying/construction and railway operation.

• Goal… To ensure that project-related changes can be detected and

mitigated


• Timeline: Prior to Construction

Shipping – EC 7.2 Emergency Response

• Spill Risk Analysis… Commitment # 89 - Provide a more detailed risk analysis and

discussion related to shipping accidents

• Request… Incorporate the knowledge gained from the recent National

Energy Board Arctic spill response gap analysis. Identify areas and times along each shipping route where the

risk of accidents is higher. Identify the best route and times for bulk fuel shipments

• Timeline: FEIS

Recommendation “Taken under Advisement/Consideration”

• EC 6.15 Maintain a buffer of 100m between the high water mark and

borrow sources or quarries

THANK YOU

nirb prehearing conference pond inlet and igloolik, nunavut mark dahl

Documents

environmental impacts

nunavut water board

environmental management

outlineec mandatehow

ec mandate http

canadas water resources

monitoring plans

risk act page