8/9/2019 Nazism vs Communism - Prager

1/3

Why Doesn't Communism Have as Bad a Name

as Nazism?By Dennis Prager

http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34460

FrontPageMagazine.com | Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Why is it that when people want to describe particularly evil individuals or regimes, theyuse the terms "Nazi" or "Fascist" but almost never "Communist?"

Given the amount the human suffering Communists have caused - 70 million killed inChina, 20-30 million in the former Soviet Union, and almost one-third of allCambodians; the decimation of Tibetan and Chinese culture; totalitarian enslavement of

North Koreans, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Russians; a generation deprived of humanrights in Cuba; and much more -- why is "Communist" so much less a term of revulsion

than "Nazi?"

There are Mao Restaurants in major cities in the Western world. Can one imagine HitlerRestaurants? Che Guevara T-shirts are ubiquitous, yet there are no Heinrich Himmler T-shirts.

This question is of vital significance. First, without moral clarity, humanity has littlechance of avoiding a dark future. Second, the reasons for this moral imbalance tell us agreat deal about ourselves today.

Here, then, are seven reasons.

1. Communists murdered their own people; the Nazis murdered others. Under Maoabout 70 million people died - nearly all in peacetime! - virtually all of themChinese. Likewise, the approximately 30 million people that Stalin had killed werenearly all Russians, and those who were not Russian, Ukrainians for example,were members of other Soviet nationalities. The Nazis, on the other hand, killedvery few fellow Germans. Their victims were Jews, Slavs, and members of other"non-Aryan" and "inferior" groups. "World opinion" - that vapid amoral concept -deems the murder of members of one's group far less noteworthy than the

murder of outsiders. That is one reason why blacks killing millions of fellowblacks in the Congo right now elicits no attention from "world opinion." But if anIsraeli soldier is charged with having killed a Gaza woman and two children, itmakes the front page of world newspapers.

2. Communism is based on lovely sounding theories; Nazism is based on heinoussounding theories. Intellectuals, among whom are the people who write history,are seduced by words -- so much so that deeds are deemed considerably lesssignificant. Communism's words are far more intellectually and morally appealing

http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/authors.aspx?GUID=655f18b8-3f29-4aa3-b60d-da0af5fd247fhttp://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34460http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34460http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/authors.aspx?GUID=655f18b8-3f29-4aa3-b60d-da0af5fd247f

8/9/2019 Nazism vs Communism - Prager

2/3

than the moronic and vile racism of Nazism. The monstrous evils of communistshave not been focused on nearly as much as the monstrous deeds of the Nazis.

The former have been regularly dismissed as perversions of a beautiful doctrine(though Christians who committed evil in the name of Christianity are neverregarded by these same people as having perverted a beautiful doctrine),whereas Nazi atrocities have been perceived (correctly) as the logical andinevitable results of Nazi ideology. This seduction by words while ignoring deeds

has been a major factor in the ongoing appeal of the left to intellectuals. Howelse explain the appeal of a Che Guevara or Fidel Castro to so many left-wingintellectuals, other than that they care more about beautiful words than aboutvile deeds?

3. Germans have thoroughly exposed the evils of Nazism, have taken responsibilityfor them, and attempted to atone for them. Russians have not done anythingsimilar regarding Lenin's or Stalin's horrors. Indeed, an ex-KGB man runs Russia,Lenin is still widely revered, and, in the words of University of London Russian

historian Donald Rayfield, "people still deny by assertion or implication, Stalin'sholocaust." Nor has China in any way exposed the greatest mass murderer and

enslaver of them all, Mao Zedong. Mao remains revered in China. Until Russiaand China acknowledge the evil their states have done under communism,communism's evils will remain less acknowledged by the world than the evils ofthe German state under Hitler.

4. Communism won, Nazism lost. And the winners write history.

5. Nothing matches the Holocaust. The rounding up of virtually every Jewish man,woman, child, and baby on the European continent and sending them to die isunprecedented and unparalleled. The communists killed far more people thanthe Nazis did but never matched the Holocaust in the systemization of murder.

The uniqueness of the Holocaust and the enormous attention paid to it sincethen has helped ensure that Nazism has a worse name than communism.

6. There is, simply put, widespread ignorance of communist atrocities compared tothose of the Nazis. Whereas, both right and left loathe Nazism and teach its evilhistory, the left dominates the teaching profession, and therefore almost no oneteaches communist atrocities. As much as intellectuals on the left may argue thatthey loathe Stalin or the North Korean regime, few on the left loathecommunism. As the French put it, "pas d'enemis a la gauche," which in Englishmeans "no enemies on the left." This is certainly true of Chinese, Vietnamese,and Cuban communism. Check your local university's courses and see how manyclasses are given on communist totalitarianism or mass murder compared to the

number of classes about Nazism's immoral record.

7. Finally, in the view of the left, the last "good war" America fought was WorldWar II, the war against German and Japanese fascism. The left does not regard

America's wars against communist regimes as good wars. The war againstVietnamese communism is regarded as immoral and the war against Korean (andChinese) communism is simply ignored.

8/9/2019 Nazism vs Communism - Prager

3/3

Until the left and all the institutions influenced by the left acknowledge how evil

communism has been, we will continue to live in a morally confused world. Conversely,the day the left does come to grips with communism's legacy of human destruction, itwill be a very positive sign that the world's moral compass has begun to correct itself.

Dennis Prager hosts a nationally syndicated radio talk show based in Los Angeles. He isthe author of four books, most recently "Happiness is a Serious Problem"

(HarperCollins). His website is www.dennisprager.com. To find out more about Dennis

Prager, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

http://www.dennisprager.com/http://www.creators.com/http://www.creators.com/http://www.dennisprager.com/