natureview farm : harvard business school case

30
Natureview Farm Case Study

Upload: anmol-agrawal

Post on 16-Apr-2017

1.777 views

Category:

Marketing


9 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Natureview Farm Case Study

Page 2: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

BACKGROUND

1989

• Founded and manufactured in Cabot, Vermont• Entered market with 8-oz and 32-oz with plain and vanilla flavor• Used natural ingredient with longer average shelf-life of 50 days

1999

• Company revenue growth from $ 100,000 to $13 million• Fruit on the bottom yogurt• Low-cost “guerilla marketing” tactics

2000• Expanded to 12 yogurt flavors in 8-oz. & 4 flavors in 32-oz.• Exploring multipack yogurt products (for children)

Page 3: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

ISSUES & GOALSVC needed to cash out of its investment

Need to find a path to grow revenues by over 50% before the end of 2001 ($20

million)

Should Natureview Farm expand into supermarket channel?

Page 4: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

THE 4PsPR

ODU

CT

• Natural yogurt (organic)

• 8 –oz. size with 12 flavors

• 32-oz. size with 4 flavors

PRIC

E • Affordable according to it’s channel

PLAC

E • Natural food channel

• Warehouse clubs

• Convenience and drug store

• Mass merchandisers

PRO

MO

TIO

N • It’s natural flavor with high quality and great taste growth in the national distribution and natural food channel

• Low-cost guerilla marketing

Page 5: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

PRODUCT• 12 yogurt flavors in 8-oz.• 4 yogurt flavors in 32-oz. yogurt flavors in 32-oz

86%

14%

Revenues 20008-oz32-oz

Started exploring kid multipack yogurt product (4-oz)

Page 6: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Factors Considered By Consumers When Buying Yogurt Products

Packaging type/size Taste Flavor

Price Freshness Ingredient

Organic or not

Page 7: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Yogurt Market Share by Packaging Segment,1999

74%

9%

8%

9%8-oz. cup smaller

Children's multipacks

32-oz. cups

Others

Page 8: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Yogurt Distribution Channel,1999

97%

3%Distribution Channel

SupermarketsNatural food stores

Page 9: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Yogurt Market Share by Region,1999

26%

22%25%

27%Northwest

Midwest

Southwest

West

Page 10: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Length of Channel to Market

Supermarket ChannelChannel Natural Foods Channel Natural Foods ChannelManufacturer

Distributor

Retailer

Customer

Manufacturer

Natural Foods Wholesaler

Natural Foods Distributor

Retailer

Customer

15%

27%35%

9%

7%

Page 11: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Yogurt Market Share by Brand,1999

Dannon33%

Yoplait24%

Others23%

Private Label15%

Columbo5%

Supermarket Channel

Natureview Farm24%

Brown Cow15%

Horizon Organic19%

White Wave7%

Others35%

Natural Foods Channel

Page 12: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Yogurt Production Costs and Retail Prices by Channel

Natural Food Channel

Supermarket Food Channel

Manufacturing Cost

8-oz. cup $ 0.88 $ 0.74 $0.31

32-oz. cup $ 3.19 $ 2.70 $0.99

4-oz. cup multipack $ 3.35 $ 2.85 $1.15

Page 13: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

OPTIONS & DILEMMAOPTION 1

• Expand in Northeast and West supermarket region

• Bring in top 6 SKUs of the 8-oz. size

OPTION 2

• Expand in supermarket nationally

• Bring in the 4SKUs of the 32-oz. size

OPTION 3

• Stay in natural food channel

• Introduce 2 children’s multipack

Page 14: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

OPTION 1: Expand 6 SKUs of the 8-oz into eastern and western supermarket regions

PROs

8-oz have highest incremental demand

Significant Revenue Potential

First organic yogurt brand to enter supermarket has a first mover advantage

CONs

High risk & high cost (marketing)

Require quarterly trade promotions

Advertising plan would cost $1.2 million per region per year

SG&A expenses increase by $320,000 annually

Need to pay one time slotting fee

Page 15: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

OPTION 2:Expand 4 SKUs of the 32-oz size nationally into supermarket regions

PROs

Generate higher gross profit margin than 8-oz size(43.6% vs. 36% for 8-oz. line)Strong competitive advantage: longer shelf life(45% share in Natural foods)

Lower promotion expenses : promoted only twice a year

CONs

Doubt on claim of new users would readily “enter the brand” via a multi-use size Doubt on sales team’s ability to achieve full national distribution in 12 monthsNeeds to hire sales personnel and establish relationships with supermarket brokersThe 32-oz. expansion option would increase SG&A expense by $160,000

OPTION 2: Expand 4 SKUs of the 32-oz. size nationally into supermarket channel

Page 16: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

PROs

The sales team was confident that they could achieve distribution for the two SKUs.

The financial potential was very attractive (Gross profitability : 37.6%)

Lower marketing expenses; no additional SG&A costs to introduce the productThe natural foods channel was growing almost seven times faster than the supermarket.

CONs

There were many potential conflicts and other uncertain factors that the manager could not determine.

OPTION 3:Introduce two SKUs of a children multipack into the natural foods channel

OPTION 3: Introduce 2 SKUs of a children’s multi-pack into the natural foods channel

Perfect Positioning into their core sales channel

Page 17: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Now which option to consider ?

Let’s see first “Qualitatively” by examining PROs & CONs

Page 18: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

• Strong relationships

• Perfect positioning

• Attractive financial potential

• Natural food channel is growing 7 times faster than supermarkets

Option3

Page 19: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

• Competitive advantage– Strong relationship with natural foods

retailers ex: Whole Foods and Wild Oats.– Sustainable competitive advantage– Main profit comes from natural foods

channel.

Page 20: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

• Power and conflict– If stays with natural foods stores, there will

be no conflict.– Option 1 and 2 could potentially create

conflict between the firm and natural foods channel.

“…you can’t lose sight of what has made this company great.” –Barry Landers (CEO)

Page 21: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

• Brand Image– Organic yogurt– Shoppers at natural foods stores earn more

income, more educated and not price sensitive.

– Natural foods store shoppers are more concern on health issue, not price.

– If expand to supermarket, its brand image will be doubted by current consumers.

Page 22: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

• Financial and Risk Analysis– No extra slotting fees and advertising expense– Option 1 and 2 creates more expense – Lowest risk and cost if choose option 3– Will not have to compete with two main

competitors in supermarket channel which are Dannon and Yoplait

Page 23: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Let’s Analyze now by “Financial” Point of View, if Option 3 is feasible or not ?

Page 24: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Financial StatementYear 2000 Financial Forecast

Page 25: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Option 1

Advertising Cost is abundance, Natureview would have paid

4,800,000 on ads by year 2001

Page 26: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Option 2

The slotting fee is too much, Nature view would have to enter 64

supermarkets

Page 27: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Option 3

No SG&A, Broker Fee, and Slotting Fee

Page 28: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

Solution Financial Forecast’01

Page 29: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case

A Presentation by

ANMOL AGRAWAL , BIT Mesra (Ranchi)

during an intern under

Prof. Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow

Page 30: Natureview Farm : Harvard Business School Case