national science foundation: transforming undergraduate education in science, technology,...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES)
Seeks to improve the quality of STEM education for undergraduate students
Goals of the program reflect national concerns about producing skilled STEM professionals and citizens knowledgeable about STEM and how it relates to their lives
What TUES grants support Bring advances in STEM disciplinary knowledge
into the curriculum Create or adapt learning materials and teaching
strategies Develop faculty expertise Promote widespread implementation of educational
innovations Prepare future K-12 teachers Enhance our understanding of how students learn
STEM topics Enhance our understanding how faculty adopt
instructional approaches Build capacity for assessment and evaluation Further the work of the program itself
Project Types: Scale & ScopeType 1*: up to $200k; 2-3 years
A pilot study to begin understanding how various factors affect how students learn particular content or skills (*This is good for new PIs)
Type 2: up to $600k; 2-4 yearsA study involving several diverse institutions to build
on smaller scale proven ideasType 3: up to $5 million; 3-5 years
A project that involves a regional or national effort to disseminate proven materials or pedagogies
TUES Central Resource Projects: variesTypically for small focused workshops; can be
submitted any time after discussing with program officer
TUES Submission Dates
◦Application deadlines: May 27, 2011 - Type 1 proposals January 13, 2012 - Type 2 & 3
proposals and TUES Central Resource Project proposals
May 29, 2012 - Type 1 proposals January 14, 2012 - Type 2 & 3
proposals and TUES Central Resource Project proposals
TUES Success Rates
Money is distributed to each discipline; currently, engineering gets the most and that is about 50% (applies to Type 1)
Success rates in Type 1 proposals is <20%, but proposals that receive good reviews and are revised following reviewers and program officers advice usually have a higher success rate
TUES Fast FactsApplication completed in NSF FastlanePI will need registration in NSF Fastlane
◦Contact GO Office to set up Fastlane accountIf submitting 5/27, earliest start date Dec.Budget Total- $200k for Type 1 proposalsProject duration- 2-3 yearsProject Description section limit: 15
pagesCost-share is not required
NSF Fielded Searches
Be sure to complete the NSF Organization field by selecting “DUE: Division of Undergraduate Education” to isolate pertinent abstracts in results.
You can also refine search to specific field of application or put a keyword into the term search field.
Go to the NSF Fielded Search website to query abstracts for awarded institutions and projects.
NSF Fielded Search: Sample Search
Project Components
Creating Learning Materials and Strategies
Implementing New Instructional Strategies
Developing Faculty Expertise
Assessing and Evaluating Student Achievement
Conducting Research on Undergraduate STEM Education
Creating New Learning Materials and Strategies
Type 1projects can focus on piloting new educational materials and instructional methodologies; must be guided by research on teaching and learning and relate to advances within discipline.
Type 1projects can focus on outcomes at a single site, but must include assessment and community engagement.
Proposals may request funds in any budget category supported by NSF, including instrumentation.
Implementing New Instructional Strategies
Usually Type 1 projectsMust result in locally improved STEM
education via implementation of exemplary materials, laboratory experiences, or educational practices previously developed and tested by the STEM community.
TUES-Implementation projects should stand as models for broader adaptation throughout the community and must encourage widespread adoption.
Proposals may request funds in any budget category supported by NSF, including instrumentation
Developing Faculty ExpertiseMethods that enable faculty to gain expertise
(develop new knowledge and skills needed to revise curricula or pedagogy)
May range from short-term workshops to sustained activities
Foster new communities of scientists in undergraduate education
Cost-effective professional development◦ Diverse group of faculty◦ Leading to implementation/adoption
Must include evaluation efforts that describe impact on faculty, and/or on student learning.
Assessing and Evaluating Student Achievement
Design and test new assessment and evaluation tools and processes.
Apply new and existing tools to conduct broad-based assessments of student understanding ◦ Must span multiple institutions and be of
general interestProjects using established instruments
and strategies and/or likely to have only a local impact are discouraged.
Conducting Research on Undergraduate STEM Education
Develop new models about how students learn
Synthesize previous results and theories
Practical focus◦ Testable new ideas ◦ Impact on STEM educational practices
May be combined with other components
Important Features of Successful TUES Projects
Quality, Relevance, and Impact
Student Focus
Use of and Contribution to Knowledge about STEM Education
STEM Education Community-Building
Sustainability
Expected Measurable Outcomes
Project Evaluation
NSF Merit Review Criteria
Intellectual Merit◦ Importance of proposed activity to discipline or across
different fields◦ Proposer’s qualifications and his/her ability to conduct project◦ Extent of creative, original, or potentially transformative
concepts◦ Well conceived and organization of proposed activity◦ Sufficient access to resources
Broader Impacts◦ Advance discovery and understanding while promoting
teaching, training, and learning◦ Participation of underrepresented groups◦ Enhancement of infrastructure for research and education◦ Broad Dissemination◦ Benefits to society
How to Really Learn about Programs and Proposal Application Process
Become a reviewer for the program and become part of the proposal review process. ◦ Send an e-mail to the lead or disciplinary
program officer. ◦ Your name will be added to the database of
potential reviewers.◦ NSF wants to use new reviewers each year,
especially for Type 1 projects.
Resources from the Grants OfficeThe GO can provide the
following:◦Assistance in understanding program
guidelines◦Successful proposal samples◦Tips/Hints from Program directors◦Assistance in preparing application
forms◦Proposal editing and proposal
packaging◦Assistance in budget development◦Internal review and approval process
support
NSF TUES Submission ResourcesProgram Announcement
Application Guide
Program Director Contact Information
What has been funded?
Additional Resources & Tips
Open Discussion/Questions?
Grants Office Contact Information
F-218
P.O. Box 195
Pomona, NJ 08240
Phone: (609) 652-4844
Fax: (609) 626-3467
www.stockton.edu/grantsoffice