narra bark as ink.pdf
DESCRIPTION
a research paperTRANSCRIPT
1
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
Permanent markers play an important role in writing and in artworks in different
ways. It was designed to create various permanent writings on objects with enormous
creative and practical possibilities. Aside from its use in writing, it is also used in labeling,
poster creation and calligraphy. With infinite use of permanent markers, many did not know
that markers have limitations. Usually, it is a problem for artists and calligraphers to supply
ink for the markers they are using.
Typically, the inks used in most markers are made from synthetic materials like the
petroleum and chemical solvents. These kinds of materials are hazardous especially to the
health of the users and to the environment as well.
As been made into dyes, the Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) can be an alternative
ingredient for ink instead of petroleum. The Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) is native to
Southeastern Asia and found all over in the Philippine archipelago. It is a large deciduous
tree which is very easily propagated from seeds or large cuttings. It is known for its ability to
take high polish, which is derived from the trees and its alcoholic tincture that produces dark
red color dye in wood and can be used for tanning.
In today’s modern world, almost every product has been commercialized and people
sought for products that are more natural and cheaper instead.
The creation of ink with alternative ingredient to be commercialized is a demand for
the artists, calligraphers as well as for the people. The researcher thinks that Narra has great
potentials in having an alternative permanent marker ink due to its strong tanning color. The
researcher decided to test its effectiveness as an ingredient for permanent marker ink.
jeypi
2
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
This study attempted to determine the effectiveness of Narra (Pterocarpus indicus)
extract as an ingredient for permanent marker ink.
Specifically, it aimed to answer the following questions:
1. Is the Narra ink effective (refers to quality) in terms of the following:
a) Absorption
b) Stick Consistency
c) Color
2. What is the acceptability of the Narra ink in terms of:
a. Color
b. Odor
c. Absorption
d. Rate of Evaporation
3. Is there a significant difference between the Narra ink and the standard ink in terms of
Color, Odor, Absorption and Rate of Evaporation?
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This study is significant to the following:
USERS. This study would be very beneficial to the users of permanent markers. This
study provides many advantages to them, such as they would have a more natural and
cheaper way of having an ink for their markers.
AGRICULTURE. This study provides farmers and planters an additional source of
income. Also, this will increase the number of Narra trees grown in the Philippines.
3
ENVIRONMENT. This study will help to replenish the Narra trees that have been
cut down.
OTHER RESEARCHERS. This will help other researchers as that it will serve as
additional information and will add factual concepts for their review of related literature.
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION
The study aimed to test the effectiveness of Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) bark extract
to produce a permanent marker ink. This study limits its coverage on the discussion of
permanent marker ink production, chemical testing of the sample ink, plantation of Narra tree
and the impact of the permanent marker ink in the environment. The study focused on testing
its effectiveness in terms absorption, stick consistency and color; including its acceptability
in terms of color, odor, absorption and rate of evaporation.
Out of five hundred students (excluding the fourth year students) of Naga City
Science High School, thirty of them were chosen as respondents to test the acceptability of
Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) extract as an ingredient for permanent marker ink. This study
was conducted at Naga City Science High School for the school year 2011-2012.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Figure 1 shows the relationship of the independent and dependent variables of the
study. The independent variables, Narra ink and standard ink, were compared to determine its
effect on the dependent variables and the effect on them. The dependent variables are the
indicators that will show the effectiveness of the ink and its quality.
4
In order to show the relationship between variables, the researchers tested the
following: a) effectiveness of Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) extract as an ingredient for
permanent marker ink; b) the acceptability of the Narra ink; and c) the significant difference
of the Narra ink and standard ink based on standardized tests and statistical treatment.
5
Fig.1 Research Paradigm
Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) Bark Extract as a Permanent
Marker Ink
Standard ink Narra Ink
Effectiveness: Absorption Stick
Consistency
Color
Acceptability (in terms of): Color Odor Absorption Rate of Evaporation
Quality Ink
6
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The following terms are defined operationally:
Absorption. It is the ability of the ink to uptake into the fibers of the paper as rated by the
respondents.
Benzalkonium Chloride. In the study, it is an additive that prevents the Narra bark ink from
solidifying.
Effective. This refers to how the ink.
Ferrous Sulfate. In the study, it is the compound responsible for the black coloration of the
ink and is a disinfectant.
Glycerin/Glycerol. It refers to the ingredient responsible for the increase in rate of extraction
of the tanning in the pigment.
Narra bark. It is the source of extract as the main ingredient of a permanent marker ink.
Odor. It is how strong the scent of the ink as rated by the respondents.
Rate of Evaporation. The rate of how fast the ink dries up as rated by the respondents.
Stick Consistency. It is the consistency of the ink to stick in the paper as rated by the
respondents.
7
Chapter II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
The following are the literatures and studies that are related to the conduct of the
study.
Related Literature
Long before, ink is usually made from natural products such as berries, barks and
leaves extract. They have been used for centuries to create numerous colors and when mixed
to other substances can be an ink, dye or paint. Tea leaves have been also used for centuries
to make ink because of its various shades that create yellow, green, brown or black ink.
(Lopierre, Lopi. <http://www.google.com/leaf-extracts-can-used-ink.html>.)
Plants that contain tanning color can be reliable for making ink. For centuries, galls
nestled from oak trees as primary ingredient to make a black ink. The rich tanning color of
dogwood and alder tee also results to natural inks. Galls and barks achieve more intense,
lasting inks than most of the flower-based inks. Also, Egyptians achieved quality red ink with
poppies. (<http://www.google.com/make-ink-using-petals.html>.) According to
Helmenstine, any acidic fruit juice can be used to make an invisible ink when combined with
vinegar to make the ink last longer. (<http://google.com/invisibeinks.html>.)
Robbins (2010) described marker pens as pens which have their own ink source and
usually has a tip made of absorbent and pressed fiber and was first created by Sidney
Rosenthal in 1952. This marker pen had been one of the commonly used writing instruments
for about fifty years.
8
Ink, according to Encyclopedia.com (2011), is a combination of a coloring agent,
pigment and a liquid containing oils, resins and chemical solvents. In the past, ink was
fashioned from different colored juices, plant and animal extracts. But today, synthetic
materials are used in addition to these natural ingredients to improve the quality of ink
making; however, ink must have two basic components: the pigment coloring and the
vehicle, a liquid which allow the ink to be dispersed.
In addition, according to the article found in the Student’s Encyclopedia, “The ink
should make a clear permanent mark that when dry does not fade from exposure to light or
run from exposure to moisture. It should flow freely and dry quickly when written in a
surface and it must contain nothing that might damage either the pen or the paper.”
Neumann’s and Schluttig’s definition of ink as cited in Lindquist, clearly stated the
properties of ink that would be helpful in having a good quality ink. The ink must be clear,
filterable solution but not a suspension, should flow easily from the pen and should not
spread on paper. Since the ink is natural, no mold must be seen on the solution and has no
pronounced unpleasant odor. Likewise, it must have an intense color which does not become
paler nor bleach out entirely as it is used in writing. Furthermore, Lindquist added that every
good ink, whether writing, or combined writing and copying, should have qualities that give
writing that, after drying for eight days, is not removed by water or alcohol -- even by
treatment for days -- to such an extent that it becomes illegible. (Lindquist, Evan. Old
Ink.n.d.<http://www.evanlindquist.com/oldink.html>.)
9
Related Study
Caparas (2010) conducted a study to determine if the extract of Narra tree’s sawdust
is effective as a dye. There were 30 randomly selected respondents as the sample size. The
result obtained shows that 75% of the respondents said that Narra’s sawdust can be made into
a dye for clothes. However, 25% of the respondents say that it can’t be a dye. According to
the observations and results obtained, Caparas concluded that Narra’s sawdust can be a
source of natural dye which is very effective, and it produces more dyes that are
environmental-friendly.
In accordance to the study, Thomson (2006) stated in his article “Pterocarpus indicus
(Narra)” that the heartwood of Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) contains various red compounds,
and is used to make a red dye. The bark extract can be used for tanning. Tannin or tannic acid
is the brown substance found in the bark and leaves of trees.
State-of-the-Art
Based on the articles gathered, the Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) extract had been
proven to be effective as a natural dye as what the study of Caparas (2010) showed.
Therefore, the Narra bark is capable of being an ingredient for ink making. And use to the
need of making new inks; this study is envisioned to determine if the extract of Narra
(Pterocarpus indicus) bark is effective as a source of alternative inks.
10
End Notes
Lopierre, Lopi.Leaf Extracts That Can Be Used As Ink.2011<http://www.google.com/leaf-
extracts-can-used-ink.html>.
How to Make Inks Using Petals.2011. <http://www.google.com/make-ink-using-
petals.html>.
Helmenstine, Anne Marie, Ph. D., 2010. <http://google.com/invisibleinks.html>.
Robbins, Nicholas. "Yahoo! Contributor Network." 2010.
<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2269561/all_about_permanent_markers.html>.
"Marker." 1998. How Products Are Made. <http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-
2896700065.html>.
Halsey, William D. and Emanuel Friedman. Merit Students Encyclopedia. Macmillan
Educational Company, 1986. 426.
Lindquist, Evan. Old Ink. n.d. <http://www.evanlindquist.com/oldink.html>.
Caparas. "The Production of Natural Dye Out of Narra." 2010.
<http://www.scribd.com/doc/35811949/The-Production-of-Natural-Dye-Out-of-Narra>.
Paul, Werner. "Calligraphy Idea Exchange." n.d. Dragon's Blood and Ashes.
<http://www.evanlindquist.com/oldinkrecipes.html>.
Thomson, Lex A.J. “Pterocarpus indicus (Narra)”. Special Profiles for Pacific Island Agro
forestry (2006): 12.
11
Chapter III
METHODOLOGY
The study used the experimental method of research. The method is a highly
controlled procedure in which manipulated treatment or actions from a factor or condition,
called the experimental variable (the Narra ink) were applied upon another factor or
condition, and called the dependent variables (absorption, stick consistency and color) to
determine the effect of the former upon the latter. All other factors or variables were kept
constant or equal so that any change in the dependent variables is attributable only to the
independent variable.
This study also focused on how the Narra extract is capable of being utilized as
ingredient for the permanent marker ink. Additionally, the Narra extract was tested to
determine its effectiveness and through experiments, observations were gathered and utilized
as a collective in making conclusions.
The experimental set-up consists of three (3) sub set-ups and the controlled set-up.
Each set-up had undergone the same process, same environment and same tests in order to
avoid alteration and confusion of observation. The set-up with three (3) replications was
tested with the use of a standardized test, the Waterproof Test.
This study also used another method in data gathering. Thirty respondents were asked
to rate the ink in terms of absorption, color and over-all acceptability.
12
INSTRUMENTATION
The study used the following method of instrumentation in data gathering:
Questionnaire. The questionnaire was framed by the researcher in order to gather
data in determining a) the effectiveness of Narra ink in terms of the indicators, absorption,
stick consistency, color and over-all acceptability of the ink and b) the significant difference
between the standard ink and Narra ink. This had two parts, the respondent’s profile, and
question-scale part.
Part I was composed of personal information of the respondents such as name, section
and sex. It also includes the date of observation. The respondents were identified through
random sampling.
Part II was divided into two parts: a) the acceptability of the Narra ink and b)
significant difference between the Narra ink and standard ink. Respondents rated the Narra
ink and standard ink in terms of color, odor, and rate of evaporation and absorption of ink.
In order to rate the variables, the Likert’s scale was used in which 5 means
exceptional, 4 means very good, 3 means good, 2 means fair and 1 means poor. Instructions
were given that served as guide for the respondents on how to rate the variables.
Waterproof Test. The waterproof test was also used in the study to test the stick
consistency of the ink
13
LIST OF MATERIALS
Fig. 3 Test tubes on the
test tube rack
Fig. 2 Vials Fig. 4 50mL and 100mL
Beakers
Fig. 5 10mL, 20mL, 50mL
and 100mL graduated
cylinders
Fig. 6 Funnels Fig. 7 Stirring Rod
Fig. 8 Mortar and Pestle Fig. 9 Filter Paper Fig. 10 Double Beam
Balance
Fig. 11 Laboratory
Gloves
Fig. 12 Bolo
14
LIST OF INGREDIENTS
GENERAL PROCEDURE
A. GETTING THE BARK OF NARRA
The first step was getting the Narra bark to be used. It can be from an old
grown and or a fallen tree. It was removed with the aid of a cutting tool, bolo.
Fig. 17 Getting the Narra Bark
Fig. 13Glycerol/
Glycerin
Fig. 14 Benzalkonium
Chloride
Fig. 15 Narra Bark
Extract
Fig. 16 Ferrous
Sulfate
15
B. PREPARATION OF NARRA EXTRACT
After getting the bark, it was pounded using mortar and pestle. Next, the
pounded bark was placed in a container and was mixed with Benzalkonium chloride
to get the extract. The extract was then transferred to a container with a filter to
remove unwanted small particles and other residue.
Fig. 18 Pounding the Narra Bark Fig. 19 Narra Bark with Benzalkonium
Chloride
Fig. 20 Filtering the Narra Bark Extract Fig. 21 Narra ink on the container
16
C. PREPARATION OF THE INK
Other substances known as additives such as glycerol or glycerin and ferrous
sulfate were added with three different proportions. The Benzalkonium chloride
prevents the ink from solidifying. This helps in reducing the surface tension of the ink
solution, allowing the ink to soak more quickly into the paper fibers. It also prevents
molds from growing in the ink.
The glycerol was also used because of its viscous nature and high absorbency
on paper. It increases the rate of extraction of tannin in the pigment.
The ferrous sulfate is a disinfectant that aids in the inhibition of growth of
microorganisms in the ink in. It is responsible for the black color of Narra ink.
The formulized ink from the extract of bark of Narra was transferred into ink
bottles and was left undisturbed for 24 hours before undergoing a series of tests. The
recycled permanent marker containers were refilled with the Narra ink. The table
below shows the proportion of ingredients that was used in making the Narra ink. The
proportion of ingredients was based on the old recipes of ink making.
Table 1.Proportions of Narra Ink Ingredients
Sample
NARRA
BARK
(gram)
GLYCEROL
(mL)
BENZALKONIUM
CHLORIDE
(ml)
FERROUS
SULFATE
(mg)
A 100 1.0 108 1500
B 100 2.25 108 1500
C 100 3.5 108 1500
17
EVALUATION OF SAMPLES
The researcher evaluated each sample to determine the difference between the Narra
ink and standard ink using a waterproof test for quality inks:
i. Waterproof Test of Ink
Both the Narra and standard ink are subjected to the same test on the same
sheet of paper.
Samples were written in the paper and the page was left out overnight (about 9
hours) before doing the test. The water test included holding the page under running
water for about 30 seconds on each side of the page. To dry, the page was put
between two paper towels with a lightweight box placed on top to aid in drying.
For the judging factors, the results will be observed carefully for clarity of
stroke, retention of original color, and leftover 'halos' of ink around the letters. The
paper towels that were used to dry the papers were also examined for ink transfer.
The judging factors will determine the score or rating on each ink with 5 as the
highest, indicating the ink’s retention on the paper, and 1 as the lowest, indicating that
the words were unreadable after test.
Fig. 23 Marker B (Narra ink) Fig. 22 Marker A (Standard ink)
18
STATISTICAL TOOL
The data gathered from the questionnaire were classified, tabulated, computed and
analyzed statistically using chi-square and weighted mean to test the hypothesis of the study.
The chi-square test of homogeneity shows the significant difference between the
Narra ink and the standard ink. The weighted mean tests the acceptability of the Narra ink.
The formula to be used for the chi-square test of homogeneity is:
Wherein O is the observed frequency, E is the expected frequency and is the p-value.
To compute for E, use:
, where RT is the total in a row, CT is the total in a
column and GT is the grand total.
19
Chapter IV
ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter contains the analysis, and interpretation of data in order to answer the
objectives of the study.
Table 2. Ink Content of the Markers
SAMPLE CONTENT
MARKER A (standard ink) 5 mL
MARKER B (narra ink) 5 mL
The table 2 showed the amount of ink refilled in each marker. The two markers were
both filled by a 5mL ink before the test was conducted.
Table 3. Weighted mean for acceptability of Narra Ink
Odor Color Absorption Rate of Evaporation
3.13 2.83 2.33 2.17
The table 3 showed the weighted mean for the acceptability of the Narra ink. It also
showed the result of the survey from the 30 respondents. The first row is the indicators and
the second one is the mean. In terms of odor, the Narra ink has a mean of 3.13 (means
Satisfactory) as the grade based from the questionnaire. For the color, it has a mean of 2.97
which is also satisfactory. Regarding absorption, it has a mean of 2.33 which is
unsatisfactory. While the rate of evaporation that has a mean of 2.1. The results show that the
Narra ink has a poor rating and only the color and odor are the average factors of it. Odor has
20
mostly not pleasant smell. The color is pale and it has a very slow evaporation and
unsatisfactory absorption which causes the paper to stay damp for several minutes.
Table 4. Respondents’ weighted score for the two inks
Samples Odor Color Absorption Rate of
Evaporation
Marker A
(with standard
ink)
3.27 4.27 4.13 4.30
Marker B
(with Narra ink)
3.13 2.83 2.33 2.17
The odor between the two inks is not significantly different. Table 4 showed that the
weighted score for Narra ink is almost at the same level with standard ink having a difference
of 0.14. On the other hand, the color, absorption and rate of evaporation of standard ink were
much higher than the Narra ink having a difference ranging from 1.34 - 2.17. Therefore, it
showed that the standard ink is better than the Narra ink.
Table 5.Rating score of the two inks in the Waterproof Standardized Test
NARRA INK STANDARD INK
3.5 4.5
Table 5 showed the rating score of the two inks in the conducted waterproof test. The
Narra Ink had some halo, but the letters are still clear and dark. It has a little change in color.
One (1) point was taken off for the halo, and a half point for the color loss. The ink soaked
through completely to the other side. The standard ink, on the other hand, has some evident,
21
but minimal, formation of halo. The excess ink washed away when left under heavy running
water, yet the ink bled through the page slightly more after water exposure. The individual
strokes were blended together and the stroke detail was lost. A half point was taken off for
the loss of stroke detail and minimal haloing. Letters were still clear and the color was intact.
It suggests that the ink has a higher score than the Narra ink.
Table 6. Significant difference between Narra Ink and Standard Ink
Indicator Computed
Value (CV)
Degree of
Freedom (df)
Tabulated
Value (TV)
Relationship
of CV and TV Remarks
Odor 6.688 4
9.488*
CV < TV Not
Significant
Color 15.882 4 CV > TV Significant
Absorption 26.182 4 CV > TV Significant
Rate of
Evaporation 39.108 4 CV > TV Significant
* at 0.05 level of significance
Table 6 shows whether there is a significant difference between the Narra ink and
standard ink. The computed value for Odor, Color, Absorption and Rate of Evaporation were
6.688, 15.882, 26.182 and 39.108, respectively. The tabulated value obtained from the degree
of freedom of 4 is 9.488 at 0.05 level of significance.
It shows that the two inks have a significant difference in terms of Color, Absorption
and Rate of Evaporation while no significant difference in Odor.
In the first indicator, the odor, having no significant difference implies that both inks
have the same odor as for the respondents.
For the second indicator, the color, having a significant difference means that the
color of the two inks is comparable to each other.
22
In the third and last indicator, the absorption and rate of evaporation indicate that
there is a significant difference which means that the absorption and rate of evaporation of
the two inks is comparable to each other according to the respondents’ perceptions.
23
Chapter V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This chapter presents the summary, conclusion and recommendation of the study.
The study attempted to determine the effectiveness of Narra (Pterocarpus indicus)
Extract as an ingredient for permanent marker ink with 30 respondents and conducted at
Naga City Science High School for school year 2011-2012.
Specifically, the study aimed to answer the following:
1) Is the Narra extract ink effective in terms of the absorption, stick consistency and
color?
Summary of Findings:
The Narra ink had a score of 3.5 for the stick consistency which implies that
there is a loss of color and the ink marks spread evenly on the paper. Based on the
results of the survey, it showed that the Narra ink got a weighted score of 2.93 in
color. It clearly shows that the ink’s color looks to be from bright to pale-black. In
terms of absorption, the ink got a weighted score of 2.33 which means that it has low
soaking ability in papers.
Conclusion:
The waterproof test concludes that the Narra ink cannot be advertised as
waterproof but very resistant. Based on the results, the ink, therefore, is not effective
in terms of color and absorption.
24
2) What is the acceptability of the Narra ink in terms of color, odor, absorption and rate
of evaporation?
Summary of Findings:
The odor received a weighted score of 3.13 (Satisfactory) which means that
unpleasant odor is still bearable to the respondents. For the color, it has 2.83
(Satisfactory) rating, which is lower than of the standard ink, meaning it has bright to
pale-black color. Lastly, the absorption and rate of evaporation parameters, received
2.33 and 2.13 (Unsatisfactory) weighted score respectively, showing that most of the
respondents do not accept the ink in terms of these indicators.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the findings, the ink has low acceptability when it comes to rate of
evaporation and absorption in paper but nearly low acceptability in terms of the color.
However, the ink’s odor is acceptable.
3) Is there a significant difference between the Narra (Pterocarpus indicus) bark extract
as an ink and the standard ink in terms of Color, Odor, Absorption and Rate of
Evaporation?
Summary of Findings:
Findings showed that the computed value for color, absorption and rate of
evaporation, which are 15.882, 26.182 and 39.108, respectively is higher than the
tabulated value of 9.488 suggesting that the two inks are comparable but not in odor
having a 6.688 computed value which is lower.
25
Conclusion:
There is a significant difference between the two inks in terms of color,
absorption and rate of evaporation but there is no significant difference in terms of
odor.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. The researcher recommends finding a solution for the coagulation of ink after several
days and also undergoes the additional standardized test.
2. It is advisable to improve the color of the Narra ink and know what ingredient can
improve the absorption of the ink, rate of evaporation and odor.
3. The researcher advocates re-associating the difference between the two inks using
other tests in order to justify the result of this study. Furthermore, having a good
quality ink must be focused on before undergoing a series of test.
4. The researcher also suggests finding a device that will make the extraction of the
Narra bark extract to be easier.
5. The researcher advises to conduct other parallel tests based on the components of the
standard ink and the Narra ink.
26
BIBLIOGRAPHY
"Marker." 1998. How Products Are Made. <http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-
2896700065.html>.
Caparas. "The Production of Natural Dye Out of Narra." 2010.
<http://www.scribd.com/doc/35811949/The-Production-of-Natural-Dye-Out-of-Narra>.
Ellie. “The Pen Hunter”. 6 November 2008. 2011
<http://penhunter.blogspot.com/2008/11/waterproof-tests.html>.
Halsey, William and Emanuel Friedman. Merit Students Encyclopedia. Macmillan
Educational Company, 1986. 426.
Helmenstine, Anne Marie, Ph. D., 2010. <http://google.com/invisibleinks.html>.
How to Make Inks Using Petals.2011. <http://www.google.com/make-ink-using-
petals.html>.
Lindquist, Evan. Old Ink. n.d. <http://www.evanlindquist.com/oldink.html>.
Lopierre, Lopi.Leaf Extracts That Can Be Used As Ink.2011<http://www.google.com/leaf-
extracts-can-used-ink.html>.
Paul, Werner. "Calligraphy Idea Exchange." n.d. Dragon's Blood and Ashes.
<http://www.evanlindquist.com/oldinkrecipes.html>.
Robbins, Nicholas. "Yahoo! Contributor Network." 2010.
<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2269561/all_about_permanent_markers.html>.
Thomson, Lex A.J. “Pterocarpus indicus (Narra)”. Special Profiles for Pacific Island Agro
forestry (2006): 12
.
27
APPENDICES
28
APPENDIX A
TALLY SHEET
Computation for the Weighted Mean Scores
Respondents
Standard Ink Narra Ink
Odor Color Absorption Rate of
Evaporation Odor Color Absorption
Rate of
Evaporation
1 4 5 5 5 3 4 1 1
2 5 5 5 5 3 2 3 3
3 4 4 5 5 3 4 2 2
4 2 4 5 5 5 4 4 2
5 3 4 5 5 5 4 2 2
6 5 5 4 4 4 5 3 3
7 4 5 5 5 5 2 1 1
8 1 3 5 5 1 5 2 1
9 1 3 5 5 5 5 2 2
10 3 5 5 5 4 5 3 3
11 5 5 5 5 3 1 1 1
12 4 5 4 5 4 3 1 1
13 3 5 4 4 3 2 1 2
14 2 5 2 3 3 1 4 3
15 2 5 3 3 4 3 4 3
16 3 5 4 5 1 3 2 3
17 2 5 4 3 4 2 2 2
18 3 5 4 5 1 2 1 2
19 3 5 4 5 1 3 2 3
20 4 5 5 5 3 3 2 3
21 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2
22 2 4 3 3 4 3 2 2
23 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 2
24 4 5 3 4 3 2 1 2
25 4 5 5 4 3 2 2 2
26 5 1 2 2 5 1 4 1
27 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 4
28 4 5 4 4 3 3 3 2
29 3 2 4 4 1 1 3 3
30 4 3 5 5 1 2 4 2
Σx 98 128 124 129 94 85 70 65
3.27 4.27 4.13 4.3 3.13 2.83 2.33 2.17
29
APPENDIX B
Computation for the Chi-Square Test of Homogeneity
A. Odor
Excellent VSatisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Total
Marker A 4 4.5 10 8.5 8 9.5 6 3.5 2 4.0 30
Marker B 5 4.5 7 8.5 11 9.5 1 3.5 6 4.0 30
Total 9 17 19 7 8 60
Σx2 = 0.056 + 0.056 + 0.265 + 0.265 + 0.237 + 0.237 + 1.786 + 1.786 + 1 + 1
= 0.112 + 0.53 + 0.474 +3.572 + 2
Σx2 = 6.688
30
B. Color
Excellent VSatisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Total
Marker A 18 11.5 5 5.0 5 6.0 1 5.0 1 2.5 30
Marker B 5 11.5 5 5.0 7 6.0 9 5.0 4 2.5 30
Total 23 10 12 10 5 60
Σx2 = 3.674 + 3.674 + 0.167 + 0.167 + 3.2 + 3.2 + 0.9 + 0.9
= 7.348 + 0.334 + 6.4 + 1.8
Σx2 =15.882
31
C. Absorption
Excellent VSatisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Total
Marker A 13 7.0 10 7.5 5 5.0 2 6.5 0 4.0 30
Marker B 1 7.0 5 7.5 5 5.0 11 6.5 8 4.0 30
Total 14 15 10 13 8 60
Σx2 = 5.143 + 5.143 + 0.833 + 0.833 + 3.115 + 3.115 + 4 + 4
= 10.286 + 1.666 + 6.23 + 8.0
Σx2 = 26.182
32
D. Rate of Evaporation
Excellent VSatisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Total
Marker A 17 8.5 6 3.5 6 7.0 1 8.0 0 3.0 30
Marker B 0 8.5 1 3.5 8 7.0 15 8.0 6 3.0 30
Total 17 7 14 16 6 60
Σx2 = 8.5 + 8.5 + 1.786 + 1.786 + 0.143 + 0.143 + 6.125 + 6.125 + 3 + 3
= 17 + 3.572 + 0.286 + 12.25 + 6
Σx2 = 39.108
33
CURRICULUM VITAE
Name: John Paul C. Antioquia
Age: 17
Birth date: January 11, 1995
Email address: [email protected]
Mobile number: +639489688401
Address: Salvacion, Bula, Camarines Sur
Mother: Charito C. Antioquia
Father: John H. Antioquia