Policy issues in mainstreaming gender into land and water

management activities, and natural resources management in the

context of MENARID

By Dina Najjar, ICARDA

Policy issues in mainstreaming gender into land and water management activities, and natural resources management in the context of MENARID

International Context

• Global awakening towards sustained efforts for achieving gender equality and equitable development– For overcoming the wicked problems (vulnerability to

climate change, land degradation, and food insecurity) need to increase the role of and benefits for women (efficiency concerns) (e.g., Najjar 2014)

– Mainstreaming gender into the ex ante diagnostic phase

– Gender transformative approaches beyond technical fixes for complex problems (Humphries et al. 2012)

– Technologies induce no harm for women (e.g., Beucheltand Badstue 2013; Abdelali‐Martini and Dey de Pryck2014).

Main Findings in the IFAD-GEF ARMP II Project

• Micro-credit opportunities for women

– Overcome lack of collateral/assets

– Venue for social networking

• Access to knowledge and training

Main Findings Cont’d

• Women targeted in groups

• Training for women related to household roles

– Pickling and other food-related activities

Policy Recommendations for Training

• Include women in agricultural programs

– Findings reveal that women are heavily involved in agriculture, which can contribute to recognizing their land rights (Najjar 2013)

– Gender-mixed training approaches (Duveskog et al. 2011; Friis-Hansen et al. 2012)

• Value addition

– Alleviate unemployment

For Targeting

• Target individual women (limitations to focus on groups) for more inclusive development

• Strengthen women’s groups (volatile groups)

For Micro-credit

• Control over income-generation from milk production (milk is an entry point)

• Loans are small

• Limited entrepreneurial spirit/risk aversion

For Monitoring and Evaluation

• Collection of sex-disaggregated data

• No harm induced

– Increased labour

• Increased control over natural resources

• Increased decision-making power

– Expenditure of profit

Conclusions

• Intrinsic and instrumental approach to women’s empowerment

– skills, micro-credit, leadership training, awareness campaigns

• Mainstreaming gender into the ex-ante diagnostic phase (including priority setting and targeting)

Acknowledgements

• Dr. Taghrid Khoury’s contributions of fieldwork and respective study report

References • Abdelali‐Martini, M., & Dey de Pryck, J. (2014). DOES THE FEMINISATION OF

AGRICULTURAL LABOUR EMPOWER WOMEN? INSIGHTS FROM FEMALE LABOUR CONTRACTORS AND WORKERS IN NORTHWEST SYRIA. Journal of International Development.

• Beuchelt, T. D., & Badstue, L. (2013). Gender, nutrition-and climate-smart food production: opportunities and trade-offs. Food Security, 5(5), 709-721.

• Duveskog, D., Friis-Hansen, E., Taylor, E.W., 2011. Farmer Field Schools in rural Kenya: A transformative learning experience. Journal of Development Studies, 47 (10), 1–16.

• Friis-Hansen, E., Duveskog, D., Taylor, E. (2012). Less noise in the household: the impact of Farmer Field Schools on gender relations. Journal of Research in Peace, Gender and Development, 2 (2), 44–55.

• Humphries, S., Classen, L., Jiménez, J., Sierra, F., Gallardo, O., & Gómez, M. (2012). Opening Cracks for the Transgression of Social Boundaries: An Evaluation of the Gender Impacts of Farmer Research Teams in Honduras. World Development, 40(10), 2078-2095.

• Najjar, D. (2013). THE MONEY OF QAROON AND THE PATIENCE OF AYOUB: WOMEN AND LAND IN EGYPT’S MUBARAK RESETTLEMENT SCHEME (Thesis format: Monograph) (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario).

• Najjar, D. (2014). Women’s contributions to climate change adaptation in Egypt’s Mubarak Resettlement Scheme through cactus cultivation and adjusted irrigation. In Buechler, S and Hanson A.S. (Eds) A Political Ecology of Women, Water and Global Environmental Change . Routledge.

Go ahead. Ask away.

QUESTIONS

and

ANSWERS