muons crossing the detector (2)
DESCRIPTION
crystals surrounded by low-Z material ( low n yield from m ). water and nitrogen are effective neutron moderators. Spectrum of neutrons in the crystals from QGSP_BIC_ISO physics list (good for m -induced neutrons ). Agreement with FLUKA within a factor of 2. Q bb. Integral: 1.4 n/kg y. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Muons crossing the detector (2)The contribution coming from neutrons and
hadronic showers is < 0.1 %. Due to the specific Gerda set-up:crystals surrounded by low-Z material (low n yield
from )water and nitrogen are effective neutron moderators
In the assumptions that all neutrons above threshold
give (n,n’) interaction, neutron signal is
conservatively < 10% of the EM signal (without any cut)
Spectrum of neutrons in the crystals from QGSP_BIC_ISO
physics list (good for -induced neutrons). Agreement with FLUKA within a factor
of 2 [Araujo et al. NIM A 545 (2005) 398]
Log(Energy/keV)
Events
/bin
/5.4
y
Q
(n,n’) thr
Integral: 1.4 n/kg
yAbove Q: 0.6 n/kg y
Thermal: 0.02 n/kg
y
distance from track (m)
Gerda water tank
radius
Muons interacting in the rock
Water and nitrogen are effective neutron moderators
Conservative estimate: the distance -n is <R> = 0.6 m (from LVD) good chances that neutrons in the
crystal are accompained by the primary in the water (veto is
effective!)
Estimate the contribution from high-energy neutrons produced in the surrounding rock by
cosmic ray ’sSpectrum and total flux (~ 300 n/m2y) from Wulandari et al., hep-ph/0401032 (2004) agrees with LDV
measurementsBackground: ~ 4 · 10-5 cts/keV
kg y(without any cut: can be further reduced by anti-coincidence)
19.1 EdE
dNn
LVD, hep-ex/9905047
Mu-induced activationMuon-induced interactions can create long-lived (> ms) unstable isotopes in the set-up materials with Q
> Q
Isotopes in LN2 (12B, 13N, 16N), copper (60Co, 62Cu) and water (16N, 14O, 12B, 6He, 13B) give contributions below 10-6 cts/keV kg y
Notice: 16N production rate in water is in good agreement with FLUKA (& data from SK) [hep-ph/0504227] good MC
cross-check
cannot be vetoed or shielded against
Isotopes in the crystals are relevant (detected with high-efficiency). From the MC 6· 10-5 cts/keV kg y
74Ga 8.1 m <0.08 ev/kg y
69Ge 39 h <0.05 ev/kg y
75Ga 2 m 0.09 ev/kg y 77Ge 11 h <0.02 ev/kg y
76Ga 33 s 0.06 ev/kg y 71Ge and 75Ge not dangerous
- a
nd
- ca
ptu
ren
captu
re,
in
ela
stic
Neutrons from fission and (,n)Neutrons from rock
radioactivity:flux: ~ 3.8 10-6 n/cm2
s
Ge ~ (40 cm)2 3.8 10-6 n/cm2s 0.0065 0.02
surface fluxLN2
suppression
vertical neutrons (?)
~ 0.2 neutrons/day 3 times higher than -induced flux
thermal component ( 77Ge)
If a neutron enters in the water, it does not get out!
Concern: neutrons channeling through the neck
No extensive simulation, only rough estimate
In water, flux reduced exponentially with <R> ~ 5 cmThen, 2 m of nitrogen suppress of a factor of 150(2 m of LAr: only a factor of
2!)
Specific MC needed
Materials & masses in Phase II set-up
Part Material Mass [g]
Crystal Germanium 2400 (per detector)
Holder CopperTeflon
31 (per holder)7 (per holder)
Cable CopperKaptonCopperNickelGoldAluminum
1.3 (per cable)0.8 (per cable)0.04 (per detector)0.04 (per detector)5.6·10-4 (per detector)8.2·10-4 (per detector)
Support strings Copper 10 (per string)
Electronics misc (mixture) 100 (per set)
Measured activities in materials Material Contamination
Copper (from LENS) ≤ 16 μBq/kg≤ 19 μBq/kg≤ 10 μBq/kg
Ra-226Th-228Co-60
Teflon ≤ 160 μBq/kg≤ 160 μBq/kg
Ra-226Th-228
Kapton ~ 2 mBq/kg [1] Ra-226, Th-228, Co-60
Enr. Germanium ≤ 0.1 μBq/kg≤ 0.1 μBq/kg145 atoms/kg40 atoms/kg0.63 μBq/surface0.13 μBq/surface
Ra-226Th-228Ge-68Co-60Pb-210Th-232
Electronics 10 mBq/kg [1] Ra-226, Th-228
[1] estimate!
Background estimationPart Bkg Rate
[10-3 cnts/kg/keV/y]Events
[cnts/y] [1]
Crystal U-238Th-232Co-60Ge-68Pb-210 (s)Th-232 (s)
0.250.050.031.530.130.17
0.250.050.031.550.130.17
Holder all (copper)all (Teflon)
0.120.17
0.120.17
Cables all (copper)all (Kapton)
0.021.31
0.021.34
Electronics all 23.65 23.84
Sum ~27 ~27
[1] 20 keV window
Plan for further studies in Munich
Pulse shape simulation and analysis first results show suppression ~4 at 90% signal efficiency for
photons
Ensemble tests based on MaGe and statistical analysis
Implementation of test-stands geometries into MaGe (for local MPI set-ups)
Neutron studies (-produced and from radioactivity)
Simulation of LArGe setup at MPIKSimulation of LArGe integrated in the MaGe
frameworkSimplified toy-
geometryGoal: complete
simulation of the scintillation photons
understand better shadowing effects and optimize the detector
packing
Possibly, understand and derive optical properties of interest (e.g. reflectivity of Ge
crystals), that are poorly known in the UV
LAr scintillation: large yield (40,000 ph/MeV) but in the UV
(128 nm)
PMT
crystal
reflector and WLS
tank
Output from the simulation
Frequency spectrum of
photons at the PM (to be
convoluted with QE!)
The ratio between the LAr peak and the optical part depends on the WLS QE: critical parameter
Scintillation yield 40,000 ph/MeV
Ar peak
VM2000 emission
Cerenkov spectrum
avoid the work duplication for the common parts (generators, physics, materials, management)provide the complete simulation chain
more extensive validation with experimental datarunnable by script; flexible for experiment-specific implementation of geometry and output;
Generator, physics processes, material, management, etc.
mjgeometry mjio
gerdaiogerdageometry
Idea: collaboration of the two MC groups for the development of a common framework based on
Geant4
The MaGe framework
34 p.e. (60%
WLS QE)
Measurement with collimated 57CoLArGe setup irradiated with external collimated 57Co source
Measurement:
Drawback: the simulation is very slow (a few seconds
per 122-keV event)
From measurement: 122 keV correspond to 24.5 p.e.
Simulation of 122 keV line: (PMT QE included)
46 p.e. (80%
WLS QE)
Optimization of Cerenkov vetoAssumptions on Cerekov veto threshold: 120 MeV (~60 cm)
40 p.e. (0.5% cov + VM2000) 80 PMTs
Detailed Monte Carlo studies (Tuebingen and Dubna) with optical photons to optimize the placement of the PMTs
neck minimum GS coverage
Pb plate
shadow
Input angular
spectrum
cos
Optimization of Cerenkov veto (2)
Optical photons tracked within the MaGe framework. CPU-intensive but works ok. It also
works with LAr scintillation and WLS
top -veto
Water tank
“Pillbox”
“Ring”
VM2000
PMT
Configurations with 72 and 78 PMTs are
being explored.
Crytical regions:
neck and bottom of cryovessel