multiscale modeling of lipid bilayer interactions with solid substrates
DESCRIPTION
Multiscale Modeling of Lipid Bilayer Interactions with Solid Substrates. David R. Heine, Aravind R. Rammohan, and Jitendra Balakrishnan October 23 rd , 2008 RPI High Performance Computing Conference. Outline. Background structure of lipid bilayers applications of supported lipid bilayers - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Science &Technology
Multiscale Modeling of Lipid Bilayer Interactions with Solid Substrates
David R. Heine, Aravind R. Rammohan, and Jitendra Balakrishnan
October 23rd, 2008
RPI High Performance Computing Conference
2Science & Technology
Outline• Background
– structure of lipid bilayers– applications of supported lipid bilayers
• Modeling challenges• Atomistic modeling• Mesoscale modeling• Experimental work• Conclusions
3Science & Technology
Lipids and Bilayers
4Science & Technology
Technological Relevance of Supported Lipid Bilayers• SLBs are important for various biotech applications
– Biological research• Model systems to study the properties of cell membranes• Stable, immobilized base for research on membrane moieties• Biosensors for the activity of various biological species• Cell attachment surfaces
– Pharmaceutical research• Investigation of membrane receptor drug targets• Membrane microarrays: High throughput screening for drug
discovery– How does bilayer-substrate interaction affect bilayer behavior?
5Science & Technology
Supported Lipid Bilayers at Corning• Applications: Membrane-protein
microarrays for pharmaceutical drug discovery
• Substrate texture is important in the adhesion and conformation of bilayers on the surface– Crucial for the biological
functionality of bilayers
• Objective: Quantify the effect of substrate topography and chemical composition on bilayer conformation and dynamics
6Science & Technology
Bilayer Length & Time Scales• Bilayer dynamics vary over large length and time scales, suggesting a
multiscale approach.
Undulations:
4 Å – 0.25 mm
Bilayer Thickness: 4 nm
Area per lipid: 60 +/- 2 Å2
Stokes Radius: 2.4 nm
Length Scales
Peristaltic Modes:
1-10 ns
Undulatory Modes
0.1 ns – 0.1 ms
Lateral Diffusion
Time: 4 ps
Bond Vibrations: fs
Membrane Fusion: 1-10 s
Time Scales
7Science & Technology
Multiscale Approach• Atomistic model
– capture local structure and short term dynamics• Mesoscale model
– capture longer length and time scales– sufficient to look at interaction with rough surfaces
8Science & Technology
Atomistic Model• The bilayer is composed of 72 DPPC
lipid molecules described in full atomistic detail using the CHARMM potential
• Water uses the flexible SPC model to allow for bond angle variations near the substrate
• The substrate is the [100] face of -quartz with lateral dimensions of 49 x 49 Å described by the ClayFF potential
ji ij
ji
ji ij
ijo
ij
ijoijononbond r
qqerR
rR
DE0
26
,
12
,, 4
2
lipid
water
substrate
9Science & Technology
Simulation Technique• System is periodic in x and y
directions with a repulsive wall above the water surface in the z direction
• NVT ensemble must be used since pressure control is prohibited by the solid substrate
• Temperature is maintained at 323K with a Nose-Hoover thermostat
• Total energy and force on the bilayer are extracted during the simulation.
Heine et al. Molecular Simulations, 2007, 33(4-5), pp.391-397. Substrate
Water
Bila
yer
Water
Lipids
Upper leaflet
Lower leaflet
10Science & Technology
Simulation Technique• System is periodic in x and y
directions with a repulsive wall above the water surface in the z direction
• NVT ensemble must be used since pressure control is prohibited by the solid substrate
• Temperature is maintained at 323K with a Nose-Hoover thermostat
• Total energy and force on the bilayer are extracted during the simulation.
Heine et al. Molecular Simulations, 2007, 33(4-5), pp.391-397.
11Science & Technology
Comparison with Experimental Measurements
SFA Measurements Between Substrate and Bilayer
Bilayer-Substrate Interaction Energy from Simulations
Simulations show an energy minimum at a separation of 3 to 3.5 nm
Experimental measurements show a repulsion starting around 4 nm and pullout at 3 nm separations
courtesy J. Israelachvili, UCSB
12Science & Technology
Bilayer structure near the substrate
• Lower monolayer is compressed in the vicinity of substrate
• Upper monolayer seems relatively unaffected
13Science & Technology
Effect of substrate on lateral lipid diffusion• Reduction in lateral
diffusivity observed, compared to free bilayers
– Bulk simulations match diffusivity of free bilayers
• Suppression of transverse fluctuations near substrate inhibit a key mechanism for lateral diffusion
Experimental valueFor free bilayers
Transverse lipid motion enables lateral diffusion
Substrate reduces transverse motion & reduces diffusivity
14Science & Technology
Atomistic Simulation Results• MD simulations show bilayer-substrate equilibrium
separation of 3 – 3.5 nm, in agreement with SFA experiments
• Lateral diffusion of the lipid head groups decreases as the bilayer approaches the substrate
• Suppression of transverse fluctuations may be responsible for reduced lateral diffusion
15Science & Technology
Mesoscopic Model
Membrane
Substrate
Continuum solvent
• Dissipative force– Formulation based on
Newtonian solvent viscosity
vaF ijwaterEDISSIPATIV
6
VECONSERVATIRANDOMEDISSIPATIV FFFdtvdm
ijwaterB
RANDOM
rTkDtttDF
6)'(23
• Random force– Formulation based on
fluctuation-dissipation theorem
• Conservative force– Elastic stretching of bilayer– Bending modes of bilayer– Surface interactions– Other (electrostatic, etc.)
16Science & Technology
Mesoscopic Modeling of Supported Lipid Bilayers• Continuum representation
to study large length and time scales– 1 m2, 1 ms
• Allows study of bilayer behavior on textured substrates
• Dynamic model that includes effect of solvent and environment All dimensions in nanometers
z axis not to scale
17Science & Technology
x
y
0 25 50 75 1000
25
50
75
100
z: 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12
x
y
0 25 50 75 1000
25
50
75
100
z: 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8
Mesoscopic Model Results
Substrate topography contours Membrane topography contours
18Science & Technology
Mesoscopic Model Results
Maximum and Minimum Separation
-10123456789
0 3 6 9 12 15Roughness in nm
Sepa
ratio
ns in
nm
Min_SepMax_SepMembrane
Coating Membrane spanning
MaximumSeparation
MinimumSeparation
19Science & Technology
Mesoscopic Model Results• Allows study of bilayer on micron and microsecond scales
• Minimum surface roughness of 4-5 nm required for membrane spanning conformation
• Spanning configuration important for maintaining bilayer mobility
20Science & Technology
AFM measurementsSpreading of Bilayer on Synthetic Substrates
AFM image & measurements
courtesy Sergiy Minko,
Clarkson University
Ref: Nanoletters, 2008, 8(3), 941-944
21Science & Technology
AFM measurementsSmoothening of membrane on rough substrates
AFM image & measurements
courtesy Sergiy Minko,
Clarkson University
22Science & Technology
Substrate roughness (nm)
Sep
arat
ion
from
subs
trate
(nm
)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
0
2
4
6
8
10
Minimum SeparationMaximum Separation
Membrane conformation vs.substrate roughness
• Model shows membrane coating up to about 4-5 nm• AFM images show membrane coating 5 nm particles
Lipid membrane conformationNumerical and Experimental Results
AFM images courtesy Sergiy Minko, Clarkson U.Macroscopic model predictions
MaximumSeparation
MinimumSeparation
~ 5 nm
SUBSTRATE
BILAYER
Roiter et al. Nanoletters 8, 941 (2008)
23Science & Technology
Conclusions• MD simulations show bilayer-substrate separation of 3 – 3.5 nm, in agreement
with SFA experiments
• MD simulations show reduced lateral diffusion in lipids as the bilayer approaches the substrate
• Mesoscopic model shows membranes coat particles up to 4 – 5 nm in diameter, in agreement with AFM observations
• Larger surface features are needed to achieve separation between bilayer and substrate
• High-performance computing has opened up new approaches for understanding biomolecule-substrate interactions, which aids design
• There is still plenty of room to grow as these models are still restricted in terms of size, timescale, and complexity
24Science & Technology
Acknowledgements• Professor Sergiy Minko & his group at Clarkson U.
• Professor Jacob Israelachvili & his group at U. C. Santa Barbara
26Science & Technology
Lipid Behavior on Nanoparticles• Bilayer conforms to
Nanoparticles < 1.2 nm
• Bilayer undergoes structural re-arrangement involving formation of holes between 1.2 – 22 nm
• Beyond 22 nm bilayer
envelops the particle
Ref: Nanoletters, 2008, 8(3), 941-944