1UNCLASSIFIED

Multinational Planning Augmentation Team Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)(MPAT)

and and Automated Coalition Consequence Automated Coalition Consequence

ManagementManagementAdvanced Technology DemonstrationAdvanced Technology Demonstration

(ACCM ATD)(ACCM ATD)

DRAFT 03 October 2006

2UNCLASSIFIED

• What is MPAT?

• Multinational Force Standing Operating Procedures (MNF SOP)

• ACCM Concept• Identified Problems• JOEF• Closing the Gaps• Objectives• Solution Set• Process• Organization• Co-Sponsors

Agenda

3UNCLASSIFIED

A cadre of military planners ...

• From nations with Asia-Pacific interests

• Capable of rapidly augmenting a multinational force (MNF) headquarters (HQ)

• Established to plan and execute coalition operations

• In response to military operations other than war (MOOTW) / small scale contingencies (SSC)

MPATMPAT

5UNCLASSIFIED

AustraliaAustralia Bangladesh Bangladesh BruneiBruneiCanadaCanada East TimorEast Timor FranceFranceFijiFiji GermanyGermany IndiaIndiaIndonesiaIndonesia ItalyItaly JapanJapanKoreaKorea Madagascar Madagascar MalaysiaMalaysiaMaldivesMaldives MauritiusMauritius MongoliaMongoliaNepalNepal New ZealandNew Zealand Papua New GuineaPapua New GuineaCambodiaCambodia PhilippinesPhilippines SingaporeSingaporeSolomon IslandsSolomon Islands Sri LankaSri Lanka ThailandThailandTongaTonga TuvaluTuvalu UKUKUSUS VanuatuVanuatu VietnamVietnam

(33 countries)(33 countries)

MPAT Participant Nations

6UNCLASSIFIED

• Improve Speed of Multinational Crisis Response

• Improve Multinational Force Interoperability

• Increase CTF Mission Effectiveness

• Unity of Effort

• Strengthen & Practice Common Crisis Action Planning Procedures

• Develop and become familiar with common Standing Operating Procedures (SOP) for MNF CTF HQ

Objectives & Methods

8UNCLASSIFIED

•Increase multinational force (MNF):–Speed of Initial Response–Interoperability–Overall Mission Effectiveness–Unity of Effort

HQ Procedures for Multinational Force OPS

MNF SOP Purpose

9UNCLASSIFIED

Humanitarian Community

MilitaryCivil

Governmental

UnifiedActionUnifiedAction

Operating Concept

How Do We Coordinate, Cooperate, How Do We Coordinate, Cooperate, Synchronize Efforts?Synchronize Efforts?

…….in a CBRN-TIM Threat Environment?.in a CBRN-TIM Threat Environment?

10UNCLASSIFIED

•Addressing capability gaps via Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTPs):• CBRN-TIM Special Staff Procedures

• CBRN-TIM Defense Procedures (Multinational force protection perspective)

• CM Procedures (for CM branch, sequel & dedicated CM mission)

• Medical Procedures (CBRN-TIM Appendix)

MNF SOP CBRN-TIM & CM

11UNCLASSIFIED

Event Links

SOP-9 (Nov06)

TE-11 (Mar07)

CG07 (May07)

Develop Procedures

Test Procedures

Validate Procedures

SOP Development:•SOP Rewrite•CM•CBRN-TIM Staff•Medical•International Standards

MULTINATIONAL FORCE STANDING OPERATING

PROCEDURES(MNF SOP)

Version: 2.0 (Working Draft)Last Update: 7 July 2006

12UNCLASSIFIED

Identified Problems inMultinational Operations

• The US lacks an early, effective, joint and multinational CBRN-related indication, warning, modeling & decision support capability.

• Required coordination across a disparate and geographically distant set of partners complicates multinational procedures and cooperation.

• International community and the US have many coalition-centric CBRN capability gaps and shortfalls relevant to

– Risk Assessment– Decision Analysis Capabilities– Common Operating Picture of the Environment– Integrated Early Warning– Modeling & Simulation

13UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Operational Effects Federation

6

JOEF Objectives*

Deliver DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS to determine and assess the operational effects and impacts of CBRN and TIM hazards on operations.

Deliver CBRN PLANNING TOOLS (e.g., OPLAN annex, staff estimate, vulnerability analysis, risk assessment). Including Resource Allocation and Medical Support

Access REAL-TIME CBRN DATA AND HAZARD PREDICTIONS by integrating with, making use of, and federating with transport and dispersion and hazard information systems and models

*REF: “CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT (CDD) FOR JOINT OPERATIONAL EFFECTS FEDERATION (JOEF)”Increment: 1, Version 1.2, 18 March 2005

16UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Operational Effects Federation

(JOEF) Program OverviewDESCRIPTION

JOEF is an ACAT III Modeling & Simulation Program that will enable Joint Warfighters and Planners to predict CBRN effects on personnel, equipment and operations and to recommend COAs to minimize or eliminate the CBRN threat.

MedicalSPODs

Mobile Forces

Consequence MgmtTTPsFighter Bases

APODs

Requirements

– Aerial Ports of Debarkation (APOD)s; Fighter Bases

– Sea Ports of Debarkation (SPODs) – Mobile Forces – Automated Tactics, Techniques, and

Procedures (TTPs) – Medical – Consequence Management

SCHEDULE FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

VV&A Process

Inc. 1 MSMS CMS B IOC FOCMS A

FTA I FTA II FTA III

FTA (AoA)

P1

Prototyping/Road-shows

Formal SW Dev

Build 1 Build 2

Software Updates

P2 P3

Deliveries

OT Report

Ops TestOp Test

2nd EA/OA1st EA/OA

EA/OA

DT Report

Dev Test V&V Report

Dev Test,IV&V Accreditation

AccreditationReviewSRR PDR CDR IPR

OT TRR

IPR

Tech Reviews

17UNCLASSIFIED

APAN

Closingthe Gaps

CrisisDESIRED

END STATE

MULTINATIONAL FORCE STANDING OPERATING

PROCEDURES(MNF SOP)

Version: 2.0 (Working Draft)

Last Update: 7 July 2006

ACCM

Procedures Tools

Multinational Partners

InteragencyResponse

18UNCLASSIFIED

ACCM ATD Objectives

• Apply tools, technologies and data to improve U.S. CBRN Defense and CM procedures and operations

• Develop capabilities that are releasable to partner nations for multinational use

• Test and Demonstrate through MPAT program and USPACOM exercises in a joint and multinational operational environmentNot a New Tool – This is Combining ExistingMature Technologies to Increase Capabilities

19UNCLASSIFIED

Automated Coalition Consequence Management

Advanced Technology Demonstration (ACCM ATD)

(FY07 ATD Candidate)Problem:•Warfighters lack a multinational-capable, CBRN-focused indication, warning, modeling and decision support capability.•This gap is a source of significant operational risk for US forces that participate in coalition operations.•Without this capability, coalition force flow in response to CBRN-crises is delayed, staff work becomes the limiting factor for rapid coalition operations, and military and civilian casualties increase significantly. Objectives:•Apply fielded tools, technologies and data to mitigate U.S. risk in coalition operations. Test the proposed solution through the MPAT program in USPACOM exercises executed in a multinational environment.

Technologies:•JOEF Increment I, II & III Software•CBRN Data•CBRN Defense Models and Decision Support Tools•Asia Pacific Area Network (APAN)•CBRN Defense Fusion Center

Residuals:•JOEF Increment I, II & III Software•Support Servers•Crisis Action Planning templates•Revised CONOPS/SOPs•Contractor Support

Participants:•JSTO, JPM-IS, AFRL-WP•USPACOM, USARPAC, MARFORPAC, MPAT, select coalition forces•JFCOM, JRO CBRND

Comments:•Improves U.S. participation in coalition event. Improves coalition training, response times, interoperability, mission effectiveness & unity of effort in CBRN Defense & CM missions.

Milestones Demonstrations

•Mr. Scott A. Weidie (808) 477-8267 – weidie@mpat.org or scott.weidie@pacom.smil.mil (Deputy J72, HQ USPACOM)

ACCMATD

FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10

Demonstration CONOPS Dev CONOPS, Soft &

Hardware Integration, Testing & Training, & Network Integration

JOEF Residual Support

A CB1 2

20UNCLASSIFIED

InteragencyPartnerTools

Multinational PartnerTools

CBRNDModeling &

DecisionTools

CBRN-DFC

APAN

JOEFI II & III

ACCMSolutions

22UNCLASSIFIED

23UNCLASSIFIED

ACCM ATD Management

Oversight GroupChair: Joint Science & Technology Office

(JSTO)

Technical Manager (TM)

Air Force Research LabWright Patterson

(AFRL-WP)

Chem Bio Defense Programs Office

Operational Manager (OM)

US Pacific Command(USPACOM)

Multinational Training(J722)

Transition Manager (XM)

Joint Program Executive Office (JPEO)

Joint Program Manager – Information Systems

(JPM IS)

Integrated Product Team (IPT)

Chair: Applied Technologies (DTRA/RCX)

24UNCLASSIFIED

ACCM Operational Co-Sponsors

• Committed–USPACOM J73 Asia-Pacific Area Network–USPACOM J8 Joint Experimentation

• Ongoing Coordination–USPACOM staff sections:

J07 Surgeon General / Medical J3 Operations J56 Theatre Security Cooperation Plans Division J57 WMD/HLD Division

–U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)–Marine Forces Pacific (MARFORPAC) –State of Hawai’i

26UNCLASSIFIED

MPAT:

www.mnfsop.com

Or send email to:

mpat@mpat.org