msn systematic evaluation plan systematic evaluation plan ...msn systematic evaluation plan...
TRANSCRIPT
MSN Systematic Evaluation Plan
Systematic Evaluation Plan for Standard One
I. The mission of the nursing education unit reflects the governing organization’s core values and is congruent with its mission/goals. The governing organization
and program have administrative capacity resulting in effective delivery of the nursing program and achievement of identified program outcomes.
Component Expected
Level of
Achievement
Frequency of
Assessment
Documentation
Found
Person
Responsible
Method of
Assessment
Results of data
collection and
analysis. Level of
Achievement
Actions for
program
development,
maintenance,
or revision.
1.2 The governing
organization and
nursing education
unit ensure
representation of
the nurse
administrator and
nursing faculty in
governance
activities;
opportunities exist
for student
representation in
governance
activities.
100% Annually 1. Graduate
committee
minutes
2. Student
Affairs
committee
minutes
3. Faculty
annual
reports/CV
4. Faculty
senate minutes
5. IU East
Nursing annual
report
6. IU East
committee
minutes
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Faculty review
Annual reports
Membership on
campus, IU
School of
Nursing,
committees
Attendance at
meetings
Annually
Faculty
scholarship and
involvement found
relative to faculty
involvement on
multiple governing
bodies, both
professional
practice and
academia.
100% achieved.
Lack student
involvement at the
graduate level.
Continue to
find ways for
student
involvement.
1.3 Communities
of interest have
input into program
processes and
decision- making.
100% Each semester 1. Advisory
Board minutes
2. Exit survey
results
3. Preceptor
Dean of
Nursing
Graduate
Committee
Attendance at
meetings
Employer and
exit survey
results
Each semester
Fall 2015
Advisory board
report: Graduate
program
accomplishments
No
deficiencies
noted.
surveys
4. Employer
survey results.
Communication
with agency
personnel
Communication
with practicum
preceptors
included:
1. Review Mission
and Vision
The IU East
School of Nursing
Mission and
Vision was
reviewed and
approved by
Graduate Program
faculty.
2. Review
Policies/MSN
handbook
Curriculum
policies were
reviewed, revised,
and approved.
MSN handbook
was reviewed,
revised and
approved for 2015.
2016, FNP student
handbook will be a
separate
handbook.
3. Course
mapping
Each course was
reviewed by the
graduate faculty
throughout the
year and approval
was
made to integrate
graduate QSEN
competencies to
each course map.
4. Curriculum
revision
Graduate faculty
approved revision
of the MSN
Program Learning
Outcomes.
Reid Health
Simulation Center
meeting minutes
and consultant
work with
SimHealth Group.
Ongoing. No
deficiencies
noted.
1.4 Partnerships
that exist promote
excellence in
nursing education,
enhance the
profession, and
benefit the
community.
100% Annually and
each semester
as needed.
1. Clinical
contracts
2. IU East-
Reid-
Simulation
Center Plan
4.Graduate
committee
minutes
5. Service,
scholarship
and service
learning
documentation
6. Faculty
Vitaes
7. Advisory
Board minutes
8. School of
Nursing
website
Dean and
Faculty
Contracts
Specialist
Data
Specialist
Review of
annual reports
Yearly contract
updates
Review of
collaborative
work plans
Membership on
task force and
committees
Annually and
Each semester
as needed.
Fall 2015
Advisory board
report: Graduate
program
accomplishments
included:
1. Review Mission
and Vision
The IU East
School of Nursing
Mission and
Vision was
reviewed and
approved by
Graduate Program
faculty.
2. Review
Policies/MSN
handbook
Curriculum
policies were
reviewed, revised,
and approved.
MSN handbook
was reviewed,
Clinical
contract
updates
found Here
continue to
maintain
current
contracts and
establish new
ones as
programming
needs
change.
No
deficiencies
noted.
revised and
approved for 2015.
2016, FNP student
handbook will be a
separate
handbook.
3. Course
mapping
Each course was
reviewed by the
graduate faculty
throughout the
year and approval
was
made to integrate
graduate QSEN
competencies to
each course map.
4. Curriculum
revision
Graduate faculty
approved revision
of the MSN
program learning
outcomes.
1.5 The nursing
education unit is
administered by a
nurse who holds a
graduate degree
with a major in
nursing and is
doctorally
prepared.
100% Initially at
appointment
and annually
1. Dean of
school’s CV
2. Dean of
school’s
transcripts
3.RCM
responsibilities
4.Dean’s job
description
5.Budget
6.Graduate
committee
minutes
Executive
Vice
Chancellor
of
Academic
Affairs
Document
review of
Dean’s CV and
annual report
Initially at
appointment
and annually
CV and annual
review notes Dean
remains
academically and
experientially
qualified.
100% achieved.
No
deficiencies
noted.
1.6 The nurse
administrator is
experientially
qualified, meets
governing
organization and
state requirements,
and is oriented and
mentored to the
role.
100% Each semester 1. Associate
Dean’s CV
2.Faculty CV’s
3. IU East
Nursing’s
Annual Report
3.
Organizational
chart
4. ISBN
qualifications
5. Position
description for
Associate
Dean
6. Associate
Dean’s
Evaluation
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Document
review
Each semester
CV and annual
review notes
Associate Dean
and faculty
remains
academically and
experientially
qualified.
100% achieved.
No
deficiencies
noted.
1.7 When present,
nursing faculty
who coordinate or
lead program
options/tracks are
academically and
experientially
qualified.
100% Each semester 1. IU
Academic
Handbook
2. Personnel
policies for
appointed staff
3. Graduate
committee
minutes
4. Nursing
Faculty
Handbook
5.Student
Handbook
Executive
Vice
Chancellor
of
Academic
Affairs
Dean of
Nursing
Faculty
Staff
Policy review
Each semester
6-1-15
LaDonna Dulemba
was congratulated
on her recent DNP
graduation from
the University of
Cincinnati and
was welcomed to
the IUESON
Graduate
Committee
No
deficiencies
noted.
1.8 The nurse
administrator has
authority and
responsibility for
the development
Each semester
1. IU
Academic
Handbook
2. Grievance
files
Dean of
Nursing
Document
review
Each semester
and administration
of the program and
has adequate time
and resources to
fulfill the role
responsibilities.
3. AAA
minutes
1.9 The nurse
administrator has
the authority to
prepare and
administer the
program budget
with faculty input.
100% Each semester
1. Graduate
committee
minutes
2. IU
statements
3. IU East
mission
4. IU East
SON mission
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Document
review
Each semester
1.10 Policies
for nursing faculty
and staff are
comprehensive,
provide for the
welfare of faculty
and staff, and are
consistent with
those of the
governing
organization;
differences are
justified by the
goals and
outcomes of the
nursing education
unit.
100% Each semester
1. IU
Academic
Handbook
2. Personnel
policies for
appointed staff
3. Graduate
committee
minutes
4. Nursing
Faculty
Handbook
5.Student
Handbook
Executive
Vice
Chancellor
of
Academic
Affairs
Dean of
Nursing
Faculty
Staff
Policy review
and revision.
Each semester February 24, 2014
graduate
committee minutes
reflect Faculty
policies that were
reviewed and/or
revised.
April 28, 2014
graduate
committee minutes
reflect Governance
and
Administration
policies that were
reviewed and/or
revised.
No
deficiencies
noted.
1.11 Distance
education, when
utilized, is
congruent with the
mission of the
governing
organization and
100% Annually and
as needed.
1. Graduate
committee
minutes
2. IU
statements
3. IU East
mission
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Document
review.
Annually and
as needed.
Current.
100% achieved.
No
deficiencies
noted.
the
mission/philosophy
of the nursing
education unit.
4. IU East
SON mission
Systematic Evaluation Plan for Standard Two
II. Faculty and Staff: Qualified and credentialed faculty are sufficient in number to ensure the achievement of the student learning outcomes and program
outcomes. Sufficient qualified staff are available to support the nursing education unit.
Component Documentation
Found
Person
Responsible
Method of
Assessment
Frequency Expected
Level of
Achievement
Results of data
collection and
analysis. Level
of
Achievement
Action
2.1 Full-time
faculty hold a
minimum of a
graduate degree
with a major in
nursing; a
minimum of
50% of the full-
time faculty
hold earned
doctorates or
are currently
enrolled in
doctoral study.
Full- and part-
time faculty
include those
individuals
teaching and/or
evaluating
students in
classroom,
clinical, or
laboratory
settings.
1. Faculty CVs
2. Faculty annual
reports
3. Faculty
personnel files
Dean of
Nursing
Document review
Interview process
At time of hire and
annually
100%
qualified with
masters
degree;
licensed in
state of
Indiana; at
least 50%
doctorally
prepared
2.2 Part-time
faculty hold a
minimum of a
graduate degree
with a major in
nursing; a
minimum of
50% of the
part-time
faculty hold
earned
doctorates or
are currently
enrolled in
doctoral study.
1. Faculty CVs
2. Faculty annual
reports
3. Faculty
personnel files
Dean of
Nursing
Document review
At time of hire and
annually
100% hold
certification
relevant to
area of
teaching
and/or have a
minimum of 3
years teaching
experience in
higher
education.
2.3 Faculty
(full- and part-
time)
credentials
reflect
expertise in
their area(s) of
teaching and
advanced
practice
certifications
when required.
1. Faculty
assignments
2. Faculty profile
table
3. Faculty CVs
4. Schedule of
Classes
5. Faculty annual
review
Dean of
Nursing
Document review
Each semester
100%
2.4 Preceptors,
when utilized,
are
academically
and
experientially
qualified,
oriented,
mentored, and
monitored, and
have clearly
documented
1. Faculty CVs
2. Faculty annual
reports
3. IU East Nursing
annual report
4. Personnel files
5. List of faculty
publications and
presentations
6. Exemplars by
rank.
Dean of
Nursing
Document review
Annually and
Each semester
100%
roles and
responsibilities.
2.5 The number
of full-time
faculty is
sufficient to
ensure that the
student
learning
outcomes and
program
outcomes are
achieved.
1. Personnel files
2. Job descriptions
for the data
specialist, CHP
director & staff,
administrative
specialist/contracts
manager
3. Resumes/vitas
Dean of
Nursing
Document review
Each semester
100%
2.6 Faculty
(full- and part-
time) maintain
expertise in
their areas of
responsibility,
and their
performance
reflects
scholarship and
evidence-based
teaching and
clinical
practices.
1. Annual reviews
2. Personnel files
3. Peer and
administrative
review
4. Student
evaluations
5. Student
evaluation forms
for faculty,
courses, and
practicums.
6. Copy of annual
review form
7. Exemplars by
rank
Dean of
Nursing
Document review
Peer and
administrative
review
Annually and
Each semester as
needed
100%
2.7 The
number,
utilization, and
credentials of
staff and non-
nurse faculty
within the
nursing
education unit
1.Evaluation
forms
2. Evaluation
policy
3. Personnel files
4. Staff handbook
Dean of
Nursing
Document review
Annually
100%
are sufficient to
achieve the
program goals
and outcomes.
2.8 Faculty
(full- and part-
time) are
oriented and
mentored in
their areas of
responsibility.
1.CTL
development
offerings
2.Faculty
participation in
development
opportunities
3. Faculty annual
reports
Dean of
Nursing
Document review Annually 100%
2.9 Systematic
assessment of
faculty (full-
and part-time)
performance
demonstrates
competencies
that are
consistent with
program goals
and outcomes.
2.10 Faculty
(full- and part-
time) engage in
ongoing
development
and receive
support for
instructional
and distance
technologies.
6-1-15
Tonya
reminded
faculty the
collaborative
workday with
IUK will be
June 24th
10:00-2:00
PM.
6-1-15
.IUE and IUK
Collaborative
workday/retreat,
Danielson Center, New
Castle Indiana. June
24th 10:00-2:00 PM.
Systematic Evaluation Plan for Standard Three III. Students: Student policies and services support the achievement of the student learning outcomes and program outcomes of the nursing education unit.
Component Documentation
Found
Person
Responsible
Method of
Assessment
Frequency Expected Level
of
Achievement
Results of data
collection and
analysis. Level
of Achievement
Action
3.1 Policies for
nursing students
are congruent
with those of
the governing
organization,
publicly
accessible, non-
discriminatory,
and consistently
applied;
differences are
justified by the
student learning
outcomes and
program
outcomes.
1. IU East
catalog
2. IU East
website
3. IU East
Nursing
website
4. Student
handbook
5. IU Student
Rights and
Responsibilities
6. Graduate
Committee
minutes
7. Student
policies
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
dean
Faculty
Data
Specialist
Document and
website review
Three years and
each semester as
needed
100% 8-31-15
With different
members, a
review of
policy
responsibilities
was completed
along with a
review of the
policy rotation.
Cindy Evans
will complete
faculty affairs
policies; Tonya
will complete
governance,
curriculum, and
the handbook;
APG will be
completed by
Amanda; and
Student Affairs
by Paula. APG
and Students
Affairs will be
reviewed Fall
of 2015
***(This was
8-31-15
Policies will be
scheduled by
responsible faculty for
one of the upcoming fall
meeting dates.
listed under
Standard 1, but
I think it fits
better here.)
11-16-15
Student Affairs
Policies
reviewed.
Confidentiality - Approved
with minor
editorial
revisions
Student
Consent for
Retention &
Use of Course
Related Work - Approved
with minor
editorial
revisions
Essential
Abilities for
Admissions –
Student with
disabilities and
Essential
Ability Policies
were all
combined into
this one.
Determined this
policy should
be an APG
Policy -
11-16-15
Policies approved with
minor editorial revisions
Motion: C. Evans,
Second: P. Bauman,
Motion: Approved
Infectious Disease,
Testing and
Immunization & the
Controlled Substance
Abuse Policy, were not
approved and will carry
forward.
approved with
minor editorial
revisions
Infectious
Disease,
Testing &
Immunization
Policy: Not
approved and
will carry
forward.
(Added #4 –
“Students must
receive a yearly
influenza
vaccine”,
suggested we
remove the
vaccination
record sheet
and provide just
a list of
required
immunization
proof and a
statement that if
“proof cannot
be furnished,
titers must be
drawn”.)
Student
Online and
Social
Networking
Policy -
Approved with
minor editorial
revisions
Students with
Learning
Disabilities
Policy -
Approved with
minor editorial
revisions
Controlled
Substance
Abuse Policy -
Not approved
and will carry
forward. (Not
approved due to
the urine drug
screen
requirements.)
Training in
Universal /
Standard
Precautions -
Approved with
minor editorial
revisions
1-5-16
APG policies
were reviewed
and voted on
during the
January 5, 2016
meeting. They
were as
follows:
Academic
1-5-16
Policies Approved with
noted revision to the
Admission Policy.
Motion: P. O’Malley,
Second: C. Evans,
Motion: Approved.
Standing
Policy: Approved
Admission and
Progression of
students who
are HIV or
HBV+ Policy: Approved
Dismissal
Policy: Approved
Academic
Standing
Policy: Approved
Essential
Abilities
Policy: Approved
National
Criminal
Background
Check Policy: Approved
Sex Offenders
Screening
Policy: Approved
Master of
Science in
Nursing
Admission
Policy: Approved, with
slight revision.
The committee
feels that Urine
Drug Screen
needs to be
added to 5.
Criminal
Background
Check under
the Application
Policy section.
The committee
approves the
Admission
Policy with this
change.
1-5-16
In the October
5, 2015
meeting it was
discussed that
the committee
members would
review the
handbook and
provide
comments by
November 1,
2015 to T.
Breymier. In
the meeting
January 5,
2016, T.
Breymier
presented a
MSN student
handbook that
has been
updated to
include all
student related
IUE Policies
and Procedures.
This revised
1-5-16
Tonya to e-mail MSN
student handbook to
committee members
prior to the start of the
spring session for
review and approval.
handbook will
be e-mailed to
the committee
members for
review and
approval prior
to the start of
the spring
session.
1-5-16
In the past,
notes of having
chicken pox as
a child from a
student’s
mother was
considered an
acceptable form
of
immunization
documentation.
During the
January 5, 2016
meeting, the
committee
determined the
only form of
Varicella
immunization
documentation
to be accepted
for the graduate
program is
physician
documentation
or titers.
1-5-16
Typhon is
1-5-16
Approved. Motion: P.
O’Malley, Second: A.
Carmack, Motion:
Approved.
1-5-16
Approved by
currently being
used as the
documentation
tracker for the
graduate
program. The
program was
chosen with the
FNP students in
mind as it has a
clinical hours
function. The
program is
costly for the
Administration
and Education
graduate
students who
do not need the
clinical hour’s
functionality. It
was voted by
the committee
to continue to
use Typhon to
track
documentation
for the FNP
Students.
1-5-16
It was voted by
the committee
to use Certified
Profile to track
documentation
for the
Administration
and Education
Students as it is
committee, Passed
unanimously.
1-5-16
Approved by
committee, Passed
unanimously.
more cost
effective and
fits their needs.
3.2 Public
information is
accurate, clear,
consistent, and
accessible,
including the
program’s
accreditation
status and the
ACEN contact
information.
1. IU East
catalog
2. IU East
website
3. Student
handbook
4. Student
Support
Services and
Tutorial
Services
materials
5. Graduate
committee
minutes
6. Syllabus
template
8. IT website
9. CHP website
and materials
10. Financial
aid website
Executive
Vice
Chancellor of
Academic
Affairs
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Vice
Chancellor of
Academic
Affairs/Dean
of Students
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Director of IT
Document and
website review
Each semester
100%
3.3 Changes in
policies,
procedures, and
program
information are
clearly and
consistently
communicated
to students in a
timely manner.
1. IU East
policy on
student records
2. FERPA
policy and
training
3. Nursing
policy on
student records
4. Graduate
committee
Executive
Vice
Chancellor of
Academic
Affairs
Dean of
Nursing
Registrar
Data
Specialist
Administrative
Document and
website review
Each semester
100%
compliant.
minutes
6. Database of
student records
7. IU East
policy on
financial
records
Specialist
Director of
Financial Aid
Associate
dean
Faculty
3.4 Student
services are
commensurate
with the needs
of nursing
students,
including those
receiving
instruction
using
alternative
methods of
delivery.
1. Financial aid
materials
2. Financial aid
website
3. Institutional
policy
regarding Title
IV
4. Loan default
rates
Director of
Financial Aid
Document review
Annually
100%
3.5 Student
educational
records are in
compliance
with the
policies of the
governing
organization
and state and
federal
guidelines.
1. IU East
bulletin
2. IU East
website
3. Posting of
certification for
NLNAC
4. Program
brochures
5. Student
handbook
6. Pre-nursing
handbook
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Document review
Biennially and
Each semester
as needed
100%
3.6 Compliance
with the Higher
1. Nursing
Communication
Dean of
Nursing
Document and
website review
Each semester 100%
Education
Reauthorization
Act Title IV
eligibility and
certification
requirements is
maintained,
including
default rates
and the results
of financial or
compliance
audits.
3.6.1A written,
comprehensive
student loan
repayment
program
addressing
student loan
information,
counseling,
monitoring, and
cooperation
with lenders is
available.
3.6.2 Students
are informed of
their ethical
responsibilities
regarding
financial
assistance.
3.6.3 Financial
aid records are
maintained in
compliance
policy
2. Nursing
website
4. Student
handbook
5. E-mail
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Data
Specialist
Administrative
Specialist
with the
policies of the
governing
organization,
state, and
federal
guidelines.
3.7 Records
reflect that
program
complaints and
grievances
receive due
process and
include
evidence of
resolution.
1. IT website
2. IT materials
3. Graduate
committee
minutes
4. Oncourse
materials
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Director of IT
Library
Document review
MSN
orientation and
each semester as
needed
100%
3.8 Orientation
to technology is
provided, and
technological
support is
available to
students.
1.IT website
2.IT materials
3.Oncourse
materials
4. CTL student
assistance
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Director of IT
Library
Document review Each semester 100%
3.9 Information
related to
technology
requirements
and policies
specific to
distance
education are
accurate, clear,
consistent, and
accessible.
Systematic Evaluation Plan for Standard Four
IV. Curriculum: The curriculum supports the achievement of the identified student learning outcomes and program outcomes of the nursing education unit
consistent with safe practice in contemporary healthcare environments.
Component Documentation
Found
Person
Responsible
Method of
Assessment
Frequency Expected
Level of
Achievement
Results of data collection and
analysis. Level of
Achievement
Action
4.1 The
curriculum is
congruent with
established
standards for
master's/post-
master's
programs,
including
appropriate
advanced
nursing practice
competencies,
role-specific
professional
standards and
guidelines, and
certification
requirements,
and has clearly
articulated
student learning
outcomes and
program
outcomes
consistent with
contemporary
practice.
1. AACN
Essentials for
Masters
Education
2. Curriculum
outline,
outcomes, and
competencies
3. Curriculum
revision materials
4. Graduate
committee
minutes
Faculty
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Document
review
Each semester
100%
4.2 The student
learning
1. Curriculum
framework,
Faculty
Dean of
Document
review
Each semester
100%
outcomes are
used to organize
the curriculum,
guide the
delivery of
instruction,
direct learning
activities, and
evaluate student
progress.
outcomes, and
competencies
2. Curriculum
revision materials
3. Graduate
committee
minutes.
Nursing
Associate
Dean
4.3 The
curriculum is
developed by
the faculty and
regularly
reviewed to
ensure integrity,
rigor, and
currency.
1. Curriculum
framework,
outcomes, and
competencies
2. Curriculum
revision materials
3. Graduate
committee
minutes.
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Document
review
Each semester and
bi-annually
100% 6-1-15
P. O’Malley shared the R500
(Research) course map. Class
was just taught this past
spring semester and will be
offered next spring of 2016.
After discussion and review
committee recommended:
1) MSN program learning
outcome #2 add the QSEN
informatics competency.
2) Move course learning
outcome in MSN learning
outcome #5 to activity and
add course learning outcome
#4.
3) Move course learning
outcome in MSN learning
outcome #7 to activity and
add course learning outcome
#5.
Tonya reminded faculty the
revised MSN learning
outcomes are in effect Fall
2015. So the template for the
fall 2015 (contains the revised
MSN learning outcomes)
6-1-15
C. R500
(Research)
course map
approved with
noted
amendments.
Tonya will set
up a files for
each course in
IU Box for
storage of
course
resources. Will
review at July
20th meeting.
should be used for future
course maps. This includes
any courses offered fall 2015
and beyond.
Pat also discussed with
faculty where the statistics
concepts are integrated, as
well as the innovative use of
TED talks.
Discussion ensued regarding
where to place faculty
resources, easy accessibility
was discussed for when a new
faculty member or someone
needed to teach in an
emergency situation. Tonya
offered to set up each course
a file in IU Box for storage.
Discussion ensued regarding
already having those items in
the course LMS. After
discussion faculty decided it
would be advantageous to
have all course resources
available to all faculty. Then
faculty do not need to be put
into the various courses.
6-1-15
Tonya and Paula will be
working on the R590
process/course revisions this
afternoon. Will have revisions
for approval by July 20th
meeting.
6-1-15
Exit surveys/R590
evaluations/ Education
portfolio results - Assessment
and evaluation review for
July 20th
7-20-15
Tonya and Paula presented
revisions to the R590 course
map based on last month’s
committee decision to begin
selecting a topic for R590
students to work on. Tonya
reiterated that students will
still submit scholarly projects
independently, but a R590
mentor will have a group of
students working on the same
topic. Revised course learning
outcomes were approved. See
attached.
7-20-15
Committee also reviewed a
revised rubric for the
Scholarly project, a request to
add Conceptual Model to
Framework will read
“Conceptual/Framework” in
section Theoretical
Framework of the rubric.
7-20-15
Amanda Carmack presented
revised course learning
outcomes to committee for
approval. Amanda pointed
out that the Bloom’s
taxonomy verbs previously
were low for graduate
learning outcomes, the
7-20-15
Motion passed
to approve
revised R590
course learning
outcomes and
revised R590
rubric as
amended and
presented.
7-20-15
Revised L671
course learning
outcomes were
approved as
presented. See
attached.
revised outcomes were more
on the analysis level.
Discussion ensued and faculty
concurred.
8-31-15
Tonya distributed a copy of
the proposed curriculum.
Current curriculum changed
to more of a concept-based
curriculum using J595 as
didactic and practicum
courses until final courses
approved. The program
would still finish with F578.
FNP committee to meet with
Mario Ortiz, FNP director to
finalize.
10-5-15
In the future scholarly
projects will be put in groups
and each mentor will work
with a group whose project
falls under the umbrella of the
mentor’s expertise. This year,
there are four Administration
students to do scholarly
projects. The committee
discussed if they should be
put into groups or mentored
separately. It was determined
that the scholarly project
forms need to be sent to the
students to determine their
project topic to see if they can
be placed in groups or if we
will mentor them separately.
Karen will also be asked for
the Spring mentor
8-31-15
Motion to
endorse new
MSN FNP
curriculum was
made by A.
Carmack,
seconded by P.
O’Malley.
Motion
approved.
assignments.
100%
4.4 The
curriculum is
designed to
prepare
graduates to be
information
literate and to
practice from an
evidence-based
approach in
their direct and
indirect
advanced
nursing roles.
1. Graduate
committee
minutes
2. Portfolio
guidelines
3. Portfolio
assessment
results
4. Exit survey
results
5. Alumni survey
results
Dean of
Nursing
Faculty
Associate
Dean
Document
review
Each semester
100%
100%
4.5 The
curriculum is
designed so that
graduates of the
program are
able to practice
in a culturally
and ethnically
diverse global
society.
1. Course syllabi
2. Program
outcomes and
competencies
3. Principles for
Graduate
Education
4. Examples of
student work
Faculty
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Survey
Portfolio
review
Document
review
Each semester/End
of
practicum/scholarly
project experiences
100%
4.6 The
curriculum and
instructional
processes reflect
educational
theory,
interprofessional
collaboration,
research, and
current
standards of
practice.
1. Portfolio
guidelines and
rubrics
2. Portfolio
assessment data
3. Practicum
outcomes
evaluation
4. Exit survey
results
5. Alumni survey
results.
6. Course syllabi
Dean of
Nursing
Faculty
Associate
Dean
Document
review
Each semester
100%
7. Scholarly
project outcomes.
4.7 Evaluation
methodologies
are varied,
reflect
established
professional and
practice
competencies,
and measure the
achievement of
the student
learning
outcomes.
1. Graduate
committee
minutes
2. Syllabi
3. Technology
requirements
4. Oncourse
6. Exposure to
simulations
Dean of
Nursing
Faculty
Associate
Dean
Document
review
Each semester
100% 6-1-15
Three MSN Nursing
Education R590 Scholarly
projects were approved
electronically spring 2015.
The majority of the faculty
responded.
6-1-15
Full approval
prior to
graduation was
granted. R590,
three were
approved after
electronic
review.
4.8 Program
length is
congruent with
the attainment
of identified
student learning
outcomes and
program
outcomes and
consistent with
the policies of
the governing
organization,
state and
national
standards, and
best practices.
1. Program
outline
2. Program plans
3. Student files
4. Schedule of
classes
5. Graduate
committee
minutes
6. Policy on
program
completion
7. Retention rates
Dean of
Nursing
Faculty
Adm.
Specialist/
Contracts
Manager
Learning
lab
coordinator
Associate
Dean
Document
review
Clinical agency
evaluations
Periodic review
of agency
contract list.
Annually and
Each semester as
needed
100%
4.9 Practice
learning
environments
support the
achievement of
student learning
outcomes and
program
outcomes.
4.10- Students
participate in
clinical
experiences that
are evidence-
based and
reflect
contemporary
practice and
nationally
established
patient health
and safety goals.
1. Course
curriculum maps
2. Student course
surveys
3.Student Faculty
surveys
4. Oncourse
materials
Dean
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Document
review
Oncourse
review
Graduate
Committee
meeting
minutes
Each semester
100%
4.11 Written
agreements for
clinical practice
agencies are
current, specify
expectations for
all parties, and
ensure the
protection of
students.
4.12 Learning
activities,
instructional
materials, and
evaluation
methods are
appropriate for
all delivery
formats and
consistent with
the student
learning
outcomes.
Systematic Evaluation Plan for Standard Five V. Resources: Fiscal, physical, and learning resources are sustainable and sufficient to ensure the achievement of the student learning outcomes and program
outcomes of the nursing education unit.
Component Supporting
Documentation
Person
Responsible
Method of
Assessment
Frequency Expected
Level of
Achievement
Results of data
collection and
analysis. Level
of
Achievement
Action
5.1 Fiscal
resources are
sustainable,
sufficient to
ensure the
achievement of
the student
learning
outcomes and
program
outcomes, and
commensurate
with the
resources of
the governing
organization.
1. IU East School of
Nursing Budget
2. Salary listing for faculty
and administration.
3. AACN survey of
faculty salaries
Executive
Vice
Chancellor
of
Academic
Affairs
Dean of
Nursing
Vice
Chancellor
of Facilities
and Finance
Budget
comparisons
AACN survey of
faculty salary
comparisons
Document review
Annually, and
Each semester
as needed
100%
5.2 Physical
resources are
sufficient to
ensure the
achievement of
the nursing
education unit
outcomes, and
meet the needs
of the faculty,
staff, and
students.
1. Blueprints of facilities
2. Room seating capacity
listing
3. Room scheduling
process
4. Diagram of faculty
office
5. Learning laboratory
equipment inventory
6. IT list of classroom
equipment
Vice
Chancellor
of Facilities
and Finance
Dean of
Nursing
Executive
Vice
Chancellor
of
Academic
Affairs
Registrar
Document review
Each year
100%
5.3 Learning
resources and
1. Library holding
2. Library mini-grants
Library
Director
Document and
website review
Each year
100%
technology are
selected with
faculty input
and are
comprehensive,
current, and
accessible to
faculty and
students.
3. Database accessibility
4. IT resources
5. Library and IT websites
6. IU East website
7. Center for Teaching and
Learning website and e-
mail newsletter
8. Interlibrary loan
agreements
Library
Liaison
Director IT
CTL
Director
and staff
Dean of
Nursing
Faculty
Review of lab
inventory and
library holdings
Criterion 5.4-
Fiscal,
physical,
technological,
and learning
resources are
sufficient to
meet the needs
of the faculty
and students
engaged in
alternative
methods of
delivery.
1. Collaborative
meeting minutes
for the two
graduate
programs.
2. Monthly
Leadership (IUE
and IUK)
collaborative
meeting minutes
Dean for
IUE
Dean for
IUK
Associate
Dean for
IUE
Associate
Dean for
IUK
All faculty
Document review Each year 100%
Systematic Evaluation Plan for Standard VI: VI. Outcomes: Program evaluation demonstrates that students and graduates have achieved the student learning outcomes, program outcomes, and role-specific
graduate competencies of the nursing education unit.
Component Documentation
Found
Person
Responsible
Method of
Assessment
Frequency Expected
Level of
Achievement
Results of data
collection and analysis.
Level of Achievement
Action
6.1 The
systematic plan
for evaluation of
the nursing
education unit
emphasizes the
ongoing
assessment and
evaluation of
each of the
following:
•Student learning
outcomes;
•Program
outcomes;
•Role-specific
professional
competencies;
and
•The ACEN
Standards.
The systematic
plan of
evaluation
contains specific,
measurable
expected levels
of achievement;
frequency of
assessment;
appropriate
assessment
methods; and a
minimum of
1. Systematic
evaluation plan
2. Graduate
assessment plan
3. Campus
assessment
report
4. Graduate
Committee/NFC
minutes
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Review and
discussion
Each semester
100% 6-1-15
Tonya asked faculty to
review some revisions
to the Nursing
Education
portfolio/reflection
rubric. Tonya reminded
faculty that inter-rater
reliability was poor last
year. Suggested
revisions/changes with
course so far:
1) Students reflect to
the NLN Nurse
Educator
Competencies each
week during the
practicum semester
(versus reflecting to
both MSN learning
outcomes and NLN
Competencies, Tonya
felt this created
confusion to the
students last year).
2) The final rubric was
revised to better align
with the students final
portfolio/reflection
rubric. The final
portfolio/reflection
included both MSN
6-1-15
After discussion
and review faculty
agreed to revised
Nursing Education
Portfolio/reflection
rubric. Tonya will
compile
portfolio/reflections
from spring 2015
and disseminate to
faculty (Baumann,
Dulemba, Bow and
O’Malley). Results
should be returned
to Tonya by July
10, 2015.
three years of
data for each
component
within the
plan.**
program learning
outcomes and NLN
competencies.
3) Tonya removed the
4-3-2-1 for each
example the NLN
notes could be
evidence of meeting
the competency.
Instead, there is now an
evaluation grid of 4-3-
2-1 for the NLN
competency only.
Faculty reviewed the
evaluation grid:
4=Excellence Evident
in Meeting MSN
Outcome
Evaluator easily finds
evidence that is
presented
professionally; and
Evidence presented
shows that student has
mastered the
competency in a
manner that suggests
the best
practice/exemplary
practice; or
Demonstrates high
level of integration of
knowledge, unusually
strong insight.
3=Satisfactory
Performance Evident in
Meeting MSN
Outcome
Evaluator easily finds
evidence that is
presented
professionally; and
Evidence presented
shows that the student
has mastered the
competency in a
complete manner; or
Demonstrates good
integration of
knowledge, insight.
2=Just Below
Satisfactory
Performance Evident in
Meeting MSN
Outcome
Evaluator finds
evidence only after
searching the portfolio;
or
Evaluator finds that
evidence is not
presented in a
professional manner; or
Evidence presented
shows some areas that
are lacking with regard
to achievement of the
competency.
1=Unsatisfactory
Performance Evident in
Meeting MSN
Outcome
Evaluator is unable to
find evidence pertinent
to the competency; or
Evidence presented
does not show that the
student addressed the
competency in a
relevant/reasonable
manner (lacks attention
to basic aspects of
competency); or
Evidence presented is
found to be unsafe,
unethical, or
fraudulent.
4=Excellence Evident
3=Satisfactory
Performance
2=Just Below
Satisfactory.
1=Unsatisfactory
Performance
Faculty suggested
noting on the rubric
that the NLN Nurse
Educator
Competencies have
“suggested items of
evidence” but are not
necessarily all-
inclusive to meet the
criteria.
An example of the
revised rubric would
look like (this is one
section):
Program/Learning
Outcome #1
Model excellence in
nursing leadership to
improve nursing
practice within the
health care system.
Program Outcome 1
Total _____
Maximum = 12
End of Program
Outcome 1 Average _
Use assessment and
evaluation strategies
Suggested
examples/evidence:
Uses a variety of
strategies to assess and
evaluate learning in the
cognitive,
psychomotor, and
affective domains.
Implements evidence-
based assessment and
evaluation strategies
that are appropriate to
the learner and to
learning goals.
Uses assessment and
evaluation data to
enhance the teaching-
learning process.
Provides timely,
constructive, and
thoughtful feedback to
learners.
Demonstrates skill in
the design and use of
tools for assessing
clinical practice.
4 3 2 1
Comments:
6.2 Evaluation
findings are
aggregated and
trended by
program option,
location, and date
of completion
and are sufficient
to inform
program
decision-making
for the
maintenance and
improvement of
the student
learning
outcomes and the
program
outcomes.
1. Exit survey
results
2. Alumni
survey results
3.National
certification
results
4. Portfolio
review results
5. Nursing
Study/Scholarly
project review
results.
6. Graduate
committee
minutes
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Review and
discussion
Exit and
Alumni surveys
at one and four
year post-
graduation.
R590 and
T679/L579
after each
semester
offered.
Every semester
with student
feedback,
concerns, and
suggestions.
100%
6.3 Evaluation
findings are
shared with
communities of
interest.
1. Advisory
board minutes
2.IU East
Nursing Faculty
minutes
3. Graduate
committee
minutes
4. IU East
Assessment
Report
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Document review
Each year
100%
6.4 The program
demonstrates
evidence of
achievement in
meeting the
program
outcomes.
6.4.1Performance
on licensure
and/or
certification
exams:
•For entry-level
master’s
programs, the
program's three-
year mean for the
licensure exam
pass rate will be
at or above the
national mean for
the same three-
year period.
•The certification
exam pass rates
for first-time
candidates will
be at or above the
national mean.
6.4.2Program
completion:
Expected levels
of achievement
for program
completion are
determined by
the faculty and
reflect student
demographics
1. NLN CNE
pass rates.
2. NC-BC pass
rates.
3. Graduate
committee
minutes.
4. MSN
retention data
5. Graduation
rates
for the School
of Nursing
6. Results of
exit, alumni,
and employer
surveys.
7. Advisory
board minutes
8. Letters/e-
mails from
students.
9. Collaborative
faculty and
leadership
meetings
Dean of
Nursing
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Data
Specialist
Curriculum
committee
Kokomo
faculty
Review of National
Certification pass
rates compared to
national average.
Review and
comparison of
attrition and
graduation rates with
campus and national
norms.
Survey
Document review
Annually and
each semester
as needed
7-20-15
Faculty discussed NLN
competency self –
assessment and
compared to last year’s
results. Committee
agreed that comparing
the two cohorts had too
many variables to
compare appropriately.
The 2014 cohort only
had 50% participate
and they took the self-
assessment on their
time at home, non-
proctored. The 100%
of the 2015 cohort
participated and the
self-assessment was
proctored. Tonya
reiterated that the NLN
still offers no
benchmarking
suggestions.
Committee agreed that
the self-assessment
should continue for the
next education cohort.
7-20-15
Faculty discussed MSN
exit results. Three
students participated,
all elements were agree
or strongly agree for
the majority of the
responses. One student
marked the program as
needs improvement
and commented
7-20-15
MSN program will
continue self-
assessment for next
cohort.
7-20-15
Tonya will let
future students
know if they would
like to additional
teaching
experiences prior to
the practicum they
can seek out
faculty.
and program
options.
6.4.3Graduate
program
satisfaction:
Qualitative and
quantitative
measures address
graduates six to
twelve months
post-graduation.
6.4.4Employer
program
satisfaction:
Qualitative and
quantitative
measures address
employer
satisfaction with
graduate
preparation for
entry-level
positions six to
twelve months
post-graduation.
6.4.5Job
placement rates:
Expected levels
of achievement
are determined
by the faculty
and are addressed
through
quantified
measures six to
twelve months
post-graduation.
**Newly-
established
programs are
improvement was
needed because he/she
felt they could not
secure a teaching
position related to no
doctorate. Tonya noted
that three of the four
students applied for
full time positions at
our institution, and
those that were hired
had doctoral degrees or
were accepted to begin
doctoral study. Another
student comment
pertained to offering
more hands-on
teaching before the
practicum. Discussion
ensued: Some faculty
felt that was the
purpose of the
practicum and others
felt offering
opportunity for
students could be
offered. Tonya
cautioned that most
MSN students were
working full time and
struggled the way it
was with program
expectations. Overall,
exit results were
positive.
7-20-15
R590 evaluations-
Most response were
agree and strongly
required to have
data from the
time of the
program’s
inception.
agree with two
responses as “neither”
related to faculty
mentor knowledge
about their topic and
timeliness of feedback
to the students. Tonya
reminded faculty that
all R590 evaluations
were combined to
protect confidentiality
and anonymity for the
student’s sake. As we
progress with the
revised R590 process a
faculty mentor will
have more than one
mentee and
individualized results
will be able to be
presented to the faculty
mentor for
improvement. Overall,
R590 evaluations were
positive.
7-20-15
Portfolios- Each
student final semester
portfolio was reviewed
by at least 2 different
reviewers. Interrater
reliability was better
this year than previous
year. Results are
attached with
assessment and
evaluation summary.
Discussion ensued on
7-20-15
Portfolio process
was revised to
better ensure MSN
program learning
outcomes are met
by having students
drop graded
assignments in their
portfolio each
semester. This will
provide, ongoing
and continuous
how to further improve
portfolio process. After
detailed discussion
faculty agreed to
integrate portfolio
process for each
course, student will
drop graded
assignments. Faculty
agreed that course map
identifies which
assignments are
aligned with specific
program learning
outcomes and NLN
competencies. The
final practicum
students will continue
to journal each week to
the NLN competencies.
Portfolio review will
consist of the R590
faculty member
ensuring each student
has a complete
portfolio by the end of
the program.
review.
6.4.1 For entry-
level master’s
programs, the
program
licensure exam
pass rates will be
at or above the
national mean.
No entry level
masters
program is
offered.
NA NA NA NA NA NA
6.4.2 Eighty
percent of first-
time candidates
for certification
exams will pass
the exams.
Alumni surveys Dean
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Review and
discussion
Four year
alumni survey
80% To date one graduate
has taken the CNE and
passed, 16% of the
graduates have taken
the CNE with a 100%
rate.
Alumni survey in
2015 will elicit
more education
major data and
Alumni survey in
2018 will glean
Administration majors
will not be eligible to
sit for the
administration
certification exam for
at least two years.
administration
major data.
6.4.3 Eighty
percent of
students will
graduate from
their program
within 1 ½ times
the length of the
program.
Program
enrollment
numbers.
Dean
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Review and
discussion
Annually,
spring semester
80% Program completion is
slightly below within
target of 1.5 times
program length at 67%
Discovered that
different admitting
semesters didn’t align
the collaborative
courses with Kokomo.
67% level of
achievement.
Will be reported to
graduate faculty
workday in August
for discussion and
plan.
IU Kokomo was
able to move
NURS Y520 and
Y510 to better
align the two
programs course
offerings.
Program completion is
slightly below within
target of 1.5 times
program length at 67%
(80% benchmark).
Reported to campus
assessment and
evaluation, spring
2014.
Program completion is
100% for nursing
education majors,
spring 2015.
6.4.4 Eighty
percent of
graduates and
their employers
will express
satisfaction with
the program.
1. Exit surveys
2. Alumni
surveys
3. Employer
surveys
Dean
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Review and
discussion
Annually and
each year the
employer
survey is sent
out
80% Exit surveys May,
2014- Education-
100% of the exit
survey responses noted
all NLN Nurse
Educator competencies
were met by agree or
strongly agree.
Written comments
were noted as follows:
Strengths-
Flexibility, hybrid-type
model, instructors are
great (0000008444
Anonymous)
I feel that the
instructors had the time
and dedication to
provide individual
attention to each
student and their needs.
My mentoring process
during the graduate
project was excellent.
The attention given to
me during my project
not only promoted my
success but took the
project to a level that
promotes my lifelong
learning and interest
beyond graduation.
(0000008717
Anonymous)
The face to face
contact with instructors
instead of an all online
process. (0000008720
Anonymous)
The leaders in the
program were available
for consultation. They
remained positive
when changes and
fluctuations occurred.
They frequently asked
for feedback as we
were the first cohort.
They challenged us to
evaluate each class to
be sure we felt we were
meeting the MSN
Nurse Educator
Competencies. I
enjoyed the face-to
face instruction time
(blended with online
learning), although the
classes should be
offered later in the day
to accommodate
working nurses.
(0000008454
Anonymous)
Weaknesses-
I would have liked to
have started my project
earlier in the program
so that I could have
seen it used, obtained
feedback and made
revisions to prefect the
tool. (0000008717
Anonymous)
Some course
assignment
expectations were very
vague, limited focus on
the 3 "p's"
(0000008444
Anonymous)
Sometimes
disorganized--might be
a challenge for
someone who cannot
be flexible. Part of that,
I'm sure, was due to
this being the first
group to navigate
through--but most was
due to a consistently
disorganized instructor.
(0000008454
Anonymous)
We were required to
meet weekly and this
was difficult with
family and work
schedules.
(0000008720
Anonymous)
Administration-
100% of the exit
survey responses noted
all AONE Nurse
Administration
competencies were met
by agree or strongly
agree.
Written comments
were noted as follows:
Strengths-
Flexibility! I'm a full
time mom & wife that
works 50+ hours/week.
Weaknesses-
The Nurse
Administrator track for
MSN did not get much
attention in comparison
to the Nurse Educator
track.
6.4.5- Eighty
percent of those
1. Exit surveys
2. Alumni
Dean
Associate
Review and
discussion
Annually and
each year the
80% Exit survey May, 2014-
Education- two
seeking
employment will
be involved in
role-related
professional
practice at one
year post-
graduation.
surveys
3. Employer
surveys
Dean
Faculty
alumni survey
is sent out
graduates have already
secured adjunct and
fulltime positions
teaching.
Administration- both
graduates already
employed in role, one
received promotion
during program.
6.5- The
systematic plan
for evaluation
encompasses
students enrolled
in distance
education and
includes
evidence that
student learning
and program
outcomes are
comparable for
all students.
1. Systematic
evaluation plan
2. Graduate
assessment plan
3. Campus
assessment
report
4. Graduate
Committee/NFC
minutes
Dean
Associate
Dean
Faculty
Review and
discussion
Each semester
100% Course maps were
reviewed again in April
and May of 2013, with
additional review
scheduled for August
of 2013. Revisions and
faculty requests
approved by graduate
committee.
100% achieved.
Updated as needed.
Feedback used for
programmatic and
curricular
improvement.
Feedback reviewed
by faculty at
regularly scheduled
faculty meetings.
See noted course
map revisions
above in Standard
6.3.
100% Course maps reviewed
summer 2014, fall
2014, and spring 2015
Updated as needed.
Feedback reviewed
by faculty at
regularly scheduled
faculty meetings.
MSN Program Assessment Report- 2013/2014
I. Mission and Vision- the IU East School of Nursing Mission and Vision was reviewed and
approved.
II. Policies- Faculty and Governance & Administration policies were reviewed, revised, and
approved.
III. Course mapping- Each course was reviewed by the graduate faculty throughout the
year and approval was made to integrate graduate QSEN competencies to each course
map. Courses reviewed this year were: L574; N504; T679; L579; R505; Y510; Y520; L671;
T619; R590; R500; J595; T617; I630; N502; T619; T670.
IV. Curriculum revision- After investigation of several graduate programs faculty voted to
eliminate Statistics (R505) from the curriculum. The Education concentration will now
require N504, Leadership for Advanced Practice and the Administration concentration will
require an additional 3 credit hours of elective. The proposed FNP program does not
require stats.
V. Certified Nurse Educator (CNE) certification self-assessment results-
Major Area Points Percent correct
Facilitate Learning 8/16
10/16
14/16
50%
63%
88%
Facilitate Learner
Development and Socialization
6/7
7/7
4/7
86%
100%
57%
Use Assessment and Evaluation
Strategies
7/10
6/10
6/10
70%
60%
60%
Participate in Curriculum
Design and Evaluation of
Program Outcomes
7/12
8/12
9/12
58%
67%
75%
Pursue Continuous Quality
Improvement in the Academic
Nurse Educator Role
4/8
4/8
5/8
50%
50%
63%
Engage in Scholarship, Service,
and Leadership
7/12
8/12
11/12
60%
67%
92%
Summary 39/65
43/65
49/65
60%
66%
75%
To date one graduate has taken the CNE and has passed!
VI. Graduation and Retention- To date the first two cohorts admitted to the IUE MSN
program has been 14. Eight graduated within 1 ½ times the length of the program. Of the
original 14, two moved out of the geographical area (out-of-state) after semester one and
semester two, one decided to pursue opportunities outside of nursing, two have taken a
leave of absence due to health issues, and one student did not meet the minimum
requirements for the NURS T617 course and has decided to pursue other options to
continue her education.
This resulted in 67% of the graduates completing their program within the 1 ½ times the
length of the program. It should be noted; however, that of the five who will not be
graduating at this time, only one was due to inability to pass course learning outcomes. The
rest of the cohort moved out of the area or changed their mind about a MSN degree at this
time.
For the first time a graduate hooding was held during the school of nursing recognition
ceremony. Seven of the eight MSN graduates participated in the hooding and walked in
graduation.
VII. FNP proposal- Graduate committee approved a 42 credit hour Family Nurse
Practitioner (FNP) program. To date this has been further approved by: Nurse Faculty
Council, IU East Faculty Senate, IU Academic Leadership Council, one more approval in
June of 2014. Program anticipates admitting the first cohort of 15 January of 2015.
VIII. WEAVE- 2013/2014 assessment data has been uploaded successfully to WEAVE.
IV. ACEN Accreditation- ACEN accreditation was approved in March of 2014.
2015 Goals:
1) ACEN Change report: Upon approval of FNP program, the ACEN substantial change
report will be submitted. Anticipate an accreditation visit fall of 2014.
2) Begin FNP program January 2015- Will be implementing an FNP curriculum committee
after approval of FNP program. Curriculum work will begin to admit January 2015
cohort.
3) Advanced Practice Education Associates (APEA)- Begin work with APEA for
assessment and review exams for FNP program to ensure successful Advanced Practice
Certification pass rates for our graduates.
4) Pilot Meditreck- Web-based tracking system for portfolios, survey administration and
evaluation, report tracking, immunization and annual requirements tracking.
5) Hire a part-time FNP to direct FNP program.
6) Review portfolio process- Evaluate and review education and administration portfolio
process with graduate committee.