morrison's mining reports · pdf filea complete set of morrison's mining reports,...

199
Sherwoods Index to and Outline of Morrison's Mining Reports by Don H. Sherwood

Upload: phungkhanh

Post on 20-Mar-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Sherwood’s Index to and

Outline of

Morrison's

Mining Reports

by Don H. Sherwood

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF

MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS

by Don H. Sherwood

Copyright © 2000

by Don H. Sherwood

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF

MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS

by Don H. Sherwood

CONTENTS

I Introduction 1

General Outline of Morrison’s Mining Reports 3

Outline of the Original Sixteen-Volume Set 5

II

Table of Contents of the Original Sixteen Volumes ...................................................................6

Outline of the Six Supplemental Volumes 28

III

Table of Contents of the Six Supplemental Volumes .............................................................. 29

IV

Alphabetical Index to Principal Cases, Volumes 1-22 51

Alphabetical Table of Principal Cases, Volumes 17-22 70

Alphabetical Table of Cases by Topics and

by Case Names, Volumes 17-22 77

Alphabetical Table of Topic Headings, Grouping Cases

Chronologically, Volumes 17-22 93

V Jurisdictional-Chronological / Alphabetical Table of Principal Cases 109

VI

Volume References to Index Subjects Collecting Cases Through Mid-1890 128

VII

Morrison’s Cumulated Index-Digest Titles, Volumes 1-16 134

VIII

Appendix: Indices to Cases Collected in Volumes 17-22 143

Appendix cases sorted alphabetically by topic and case name 144

Appendix cases sorted by name 153

Appendix cases sorted by jurisdiction 159

Supplemental Appendix of cases from Volumes 15 and 16

not hereinabove named 166

Sorted alphabetically by topic and case name 166

Sorted alphabetically by name 168

Sorted by jurisdiction 169

Please address any comments or suggestions

to the author, Don Sherwood, at E-Mail: [email protected]

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-1- June 2000

I. INTRODUCTION

Robert Stewart Morrison (1843-1920) was the author or editor of many legal publications, mostly on

topics within the field of mineral law. He was best known in his own time and in ours for small volumes

eventually called Mining Rights on the Public Domain. The first edition in that series appeared in 1874. The

fifteenth edition, published in 1917, was his last, as he was killed three years later in an interurban railcar

accident between Boulder and Denver. By that time, the books in that series were co-authored by his

son-in-law, Emilio Dominguez De Soto (1865-1937). The sixteenth and last edition, published in 1936 by Mr.

De Soto and Arthur R. Morrison, both Colorado lawyers (Bender-Moss Company, San Francisco), is still in

regular use by mining lawyers.

Those books were intended for prospectors, surveyors and mining companies as well as attorneys. For

attorneys, however, the most valuable work by Robert S. Morrison was his remarkable series of annotated

volumes of selected cases on mineral law: Mining Reports (published by Callaghan & Company, Chicago).

Over the course of twelve years, he produced a set of sixteen volumes covering the whole of the field,

completed in 1894, and he both corrected some omissions in and supplemented the set with six additional

volumes published from 1903 to 1906. By that time, the modern system of national reporters had supplanted

such individual efforts, and the series was discontinued. A complete set of Morrison's Mining Reports, better

illustrated, annotated and digested than any other source, primary or secondary, has always been and still is for

mining lawyers a prized possession extremely useful in researching antecedents of our present law.

There are three shortcomings in Morrison's Mining Reports. First, not all cases on mining law were

included. Second, the cases are divided among the first fifteen volumes by topics alphabetically and

supplemented in the same fashion in volumes fifteen and sixteen, but in later volumes chronologically. Third,

there is neither a consolidated index to the topics nor a combined table of cases. There is nothing to be gained

now in identifying or supplying omitted cases(many of which are mentioned incidentally in Mr. Morrison's

annotations), but something can be done about the unwieldy and inconsistent sorting and the lack of a

convenient, all-inclusive index and case table. If the absence of personal computers and an Internet helped to

create such problems, such modern devices can help to solve those problems. Recognizing that Morrison's Mining Reports are still one of the best resources available to lawyers working with cases on mining law in

general and American public-domain mining law in particular up through the earliest years of the Twentieth

Century, this index honors the monumental work of Robert Stewart Morrison by making it easy to search that

work for cases which matter.

With but one or two exceptions, the topics selected by Mr. Morrison are entirely familiar to lawyers

working three generations later. His preference, however, for the topic "apex" over the usual "extralateral

rights" in both of his major works can only be explained by the fact that he chose the former before the latter

was popularized by others; in retrospect, his was the better choice, and no other reference to the right of lateral

pursuit will here sully his list.

This is not to say that all the parts of Morrison's Mining Reports are equally useful, as much of the work

is of no real use today. So the purpose of this index and outline is not only to facilitate research in Morrison's Mining Reports but also to sever that therein which continues to be useful from that which is not. The

overriding purpose here is to make available to the owner or user of Morrison's Mining Reports an index and

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-2- June 2000

guide to those cases, and to Morrison's annotations thereto, which are still valuable in the practice of mining

law on the public lands in the Western United States.

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-3- June 2000

GENERAL OUTLINE OF MORRISON'S MINING REPORTS

This outline is organized by the subject categories into which Robert Stewart Morrison divided and

arranged his selected cases.

In his Preface to Volume 1 of his Mining Reports, at iii-iv, written while practicing law in Georgetown,

Colorado, and dated November 21, 1882, Mr. Morrison said:

This and the ensuing volumes of the set are intended to present not merely the

leading, but the bulk or mass of the cases of importance, and not of mere local

interest, bearing on the subject-matter of mines or mining, decided in the appellate

courts of the several States and in the Federal courts. Also the leading irrigation cases

and a large portion of the English mining decisions. Cases reported in nisi prius or

inferior State courts have been in general rejected, as have been most decisions by

divided benches.

The majority of the American decisions obviously come from the Pacific slope

and those States of the East which contain the most noted mineral deposits, especially

Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, North Carolina and Georgia; but the

series contains cases from every State in the Union where a mining case could be

found, from the mining Territories, and often from reports and magazines totally

inaccessible except in the largest public libraries. * * * *

The entire opinion is given in every instance with statement of facts as full as that

contained in the original report; in no instance has any portion of the opinion been

omitted, so that the points of practice and other points not essential to the case as a

mining case, are printed, and the substance indicated in the head notes as completely

as in the original volumes, and as fully as the mining points involved.

The order of arrangement is alphabetical by subject. The leading case under each

subject, where such case presented itself, has been printed first [indicated by asterisk

in the outline below], and the others follow chronologically. Where there has been no

case which could be fairly designated as leading, or more material than its fellows,

they are printed strictly in the order of time as decided.

The last case under each heading is followed by a citation of those decisions bearing

on the same topic, found under other headings in the series, as well as to numerous

other cases bearing on the same subject, but which could not be specifically classed

as mining cases.

In the subsequent Preface to Volume 17 of his Mining Reports, at iii, dated June 9, 1903, Mr. Morrison,

by then practicing in Denver, said:

The sixteenth volume was printed in 1894. The present volume [Volume 17]

contains cases prior to that date which had been omitted and new cases into 1895, to

be followed by the decisions handed down in the following years to date of

copyright. The only material change in the order of printing is that the cases in this

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-4- June 2000

[Volume 17] and succeeding volumes [18 through 22] follow chronologically under a

specific head for each case instead of being grouped under topics as in the original

issue.

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-5- June 2000

OUTLINE OF THE ORIGINAL SIXTEEN-VOLUME SET

The system used in this Outline is:

· BOLD ALL CAPITALS indicates major topics devoted to public-land mining-law subjects.

· Bold Upper- and Lower-Case suggests topics devoted to subjects of interest peripheral to the major

topics.

Some topics have been selected because important mining cases were assigned by Morrison to them;

when thus selected here, all cases collected within that topic are indexed (unless expressly stated otherwise).

Cases appearing under any of the headings indexed herein are identified by the initial names of the

parties searchable in short-form, that is, by a single word (or at most two) in almost all cases.

In subsequent sections supplementing this Outline, the cases are indexed alphabetically and by

jurisdiction, but in this system a reversed case-name index is not necessary to locate a case known only by the

name of the second party, because the name of either party can be searched.

To distinguish one case from another, the jurisdiction and the year of decision are given; in the rare

instances where all of this information is the same, parenthetical superscript numbers warn of possible

duplication. In that regard, it is worthwhile to remember that in the years covered by this Outline, it was fairly

common for separate cases in equity and at law to be reported under identical case names.

Hyphenated page numbers give the coverage devoted to the subject listed. Colons identify the first page

of each indexed case, and parentheses indicate the pages on which topics not indexed herein begin.

Topics not indexed herein are nonetheless listed (in plain lettering), and those topic headings can be

traced through the twenty-two volumes of Morrison’s Mining Reports using this Outline.

Cases from the original sixteen volumes not generally useful today are not indexed herein, because a

table of all cases in the original set appears in the sixteenth volume at pages 675-693. All cases in the six

supplemental volumes, however, are indexed herein at least in the Appendix hereto.

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-6- June 2000

II. TABLE OF CONTENTS OF THE

ORIGINAL SIXTEEN VOLUMES

Where, in Mr. Morrison’s estimation, a leading case existed under any of his topic headings, he presented

that case first and the other cases followed chronologically. Such cases are indicated in this table by leading

asterisks. His annotations are appended at the end of each of his topic headings, and for that reason, this table

identifies the end as well as the beginning of each topic heading.

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Volume 1 (1883) ABANDONMENT [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

1 - 67

*

Derry v. Ross

Colo. 1881

1 : 1

Davis v. Butler

Cal. 1856

1 : 7

McGoon v. Ankeny

Ill. 1850

1 : 9

Richardson v. McNulty

Cal. 1864

1 : 11

Mallett v. Uncle Sam Co.

Nev. 1865

1 : 17

Oreamuno v. Uncle Sam Co.

Nev. 1865

1 : 32

Dougherty v. Cleary

Cal. 1866

1 : 35

Bell v. Bed Rock Co.

Cal. 1868

1 : 45

Strang v. Ryan

Cal. 1873

1 : 48

Morenhaut v. Wilson

Cal. 1877

1 : 53

Stone v. Geyser Co.

Cal. 1877

1 : 59

Seymour v. Wood

Cal. 1878

1 : 62

Dodge v. Marden

Oregon 1879

1 : 63

Accident

(68)

Account

(72)

Act of God

(107)

ADVERSE CLAIM [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

114 - 151

420 Co. v. Bullion Co.

Nev. 1874

1 : 114

Golden Fleece Co. v. Cable Co.

Nev. 1877

1 : 120

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-7- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Smith v. Richardson Utah 1877 1 : 139

Brandt v. Wheaton

Cal. 1877

1 : 145

Shafer v. Constans

Mont. 1879

1 : 147

Frank Co. v. Larimer Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

1 : 150

Adverse Possession

(152)

Agent

(241)

Agricultural Land(s)

492 - 496

Ah Yew v. Choate

Cal. 1864

1 : 492

Aliens [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

497 - 509

*

Chapman v. Toy Long

Oregon 1876

1 : 497

Mitchell v. Hagood

Cal. 1856

1 : 506

Ex parte Ah Pong

Cal. 1861

1 : 507

ANNUAL LABOR [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

510 - 547

*

Belk v. Meagher

U.S. Mont. 1881

1 : 510

Belk v. Meagher

Mont. 1878

1 : 522

Little Gunnell Co. v. Kimber

Colo. 1878

1 : 536

Slavonian Co. v. Perasich

C.C.D. Nev. 1881

1 : 541

APEX [supplemented in Vol. 16]

548 - 582

*

Iron Silver Co. v. Murphy

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

1 : 548

Stevens v. Williams

(1)

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

1 : 557

Stevens v. Williams

(2)

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

1 : 566

Stevens v. Gill

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

1 : 576

Note by R.S. Morrison: “The Leadville Cases”

[Cf. Argentine Co. v. Terrible Co. (U.S. Colo. 1887): 17 Morr. M.R. 109]

(1 : 582)

APPROPRIATION [mining cases only; water cases not listed; continued in Vol. 2)

583 - 699

Martin & Davis v. Browner

Cal. 1858

1 : 613

Gore v. McBrayer

Cal. 1861

1 : 645

Gottschall v. Melsing

Nev. 1866

1 : 667

Overman Co. v. Corcoran

Nev. 1880

1 : 691

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-8- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Volume 2 (1883)

APPROPRIATION (continued from Vol. 1)

1 - 17

Appurtenances

18 - 22

Spencer v. Kunkle

Penna. 1853

2 : 18

Quirk v. Falk

Cal. 1874

2 : 19

Arbitration

(23)

Assay

(28)

Assessment

(33)

Assignment

(36)

Assumpsit

(49)

Attorney

(65)

Bailment

(77)

Barriers

(89)

Bills and Notes

(116)

Blasting

(187)

Bond

(217)

Boundaries [supplemented in Vol. 15]

229 - 273

*

Pollard v. Shively

Colo. 1880

2 : 229

McGee v. Stone

Cal. 1858

2 : 238

Huffman v. Hummer

N.J. 1866

2 : 242

Stoakes v. Monroe

Cal. 1868

2 : 246

Overman Co. v. American Co.

Nev. 1872

2 : 251

Kamphouse v. Gaffner

Ill. 1874

2 : 257

Lampe v. Kennedy

Wisc. 1878

2 : 266

Brick

(274)

Broker

(276)

CLAIM

305 - 345

*

Attwood v. Fricot

Cal. 1860

2 : 305

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-9- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

McKeon v. Bisbee Cal. 1858 2 : 309

McGarrity v. Byington

Cal. 1859

2 : 311

Gillan v. Hutchinson

Cal. 1860

2 : 317

Sparrow v. Strong

U.S. Nev. 1865

2 : 320

Atkins v. Hendree

Idaho 1867

2 : 328

Spencer v. Winselman

Cal. 1871

2 : 334

Correa v. Frietas

Cal. 1871

2 : 336

Houtz v. Gisborn

Utah 1874

2 : 340

Coal

(346)

Colliery

(389)

Common Carrier

(417)

Confusion

(430)

Consideration

(443)

Contract (continued in Vol. 3)

(458)

Volume 3 (1884) Contract (continued from Vol. 2)

(1)

Conveyance

(217)

Cornwall Ore Banks

(416)

Corporation(s) (continued in Vol. 4)

(435)

Volume 4 (1884) Corporation(s) (continued from Vol. 3)

(1)

Covenant

(119)

Crimes

(161)

Custom

233 - 239

Dean and Chapter of Ely v. Warren

U.K. 1741

4 : 233

Perley v. Langley

N.H. 1834

4 : 235

Dam

(240)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-10- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Delivery (282) DESCRIPTION [supplemented in Vol. 15]

291 - 367

*

Dexter Co. v. Dexter

R.I. 1859

4 : 291

Snodgrass v. Ward

Tenn. 1816

4 : 306

Johnston v. Shelton

No. Car. 1845

4 : 308

Johnson v. Parks

Cal. 1858

4 : 316

Ferron v. Sturgeon

Iowa 1859

4 : 319

Tiley v. Moyers

Penna. 1862

4 : 320

Reed v. Spicer

Cal. 1864

4 : 330

State v. Real del Monte Co.

Nev. 1865

4 : 334

Brandow v. Pocotillo Co.

Nev. 1870

4 : 337

Phillpotts v. Blasdel

Nev. 1872

4 : 341

Sobey v. Thomas

Wisc. 1876

4 : 359

DIP [supplemented in Vol. 16]

368 - 389

Baird v. Williamson

U.K. 1863

4 : 368

Leadville Co. v. Fitzgerald

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

4 : 380

Stevens v. Murphy (see Leadville Co. v. Fitzgerald, above)

DISCOVERY [supplemented in Vol. 15]

390 - 446

Golden Terra Co. v. Mahler

Dakota 1879

4 : 390

Zollars v. Evans

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

4 : 407

Jupiter Co. v. Bodie C. Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1881

4 : 411

Crossman v. Pendery

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 431

Erhardt v. Boaro

(1)

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 432

Erhardt v. Boaro

(2)

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 434

Van Zandt v. Argentine Co. (Vanzandt)

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 441

DISTRICT RULES

447 - 503

Packer v. Heaton

Cal. 1858

4 : 447

Roach v. Gray

Cal. 1860

4 : 450

Prosser v. Parks

Cal. 1861

4 : 452

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-11- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

St. John v. Kidd

Cal. 1864

4 : 454

Morton v. Solambo Co.

Cal. 1864

4 : 463

Bradley v. Lee

Cal. 1869

4 : 470

King v. Edwards

Mont. 1870

4 : 480

Leet v. John Dare Co.

Nev. 1870

4 : 487

Harvey v. Ryan

Cal. 1872

4 : 490

Orr v. Haskell

Mont. 1874

4 : 492

Roberts v. Wilson

Utah 1876

4 : 498

Ditch (continued in Vol. 5)

(504)

Volume 5 (1884) Ditch (continued from Vol. 4)

(1)

Dower

(47)

Drainage

(78)

Dump [supplemented in Vol. 16]

160 - 162

Ralston v. Plowman

Idaho 1875

5 : 160

Easement

(163)

Ejectment

198 - 332

Comyn v. Kyneto

U.K. 2 James I c.1604

5 : 198

Whittingham v. Andrews

U.K. 1692

5 : 198

Goodright v. Swymmer

U.K. 1756

5 : 200

Jackson v. Olitz

N.Y. 1832

5 : 202

Waring v. Crow

Cal. 1858

5 : 204

Burke v. Table Mountain Co.

Cal. 1859

5 : 209

Busenius v. Coffee

Cal. 1859

5 : 214

Smith v. Doe

Cal. 1860

5 : 218

Eagan v. Delaney

Cal. 1860

5 : 223

Coryell v. Cain

Cal. 1860

5 : 226

Clement v. Youngman

Penna. 1861

5 : 230

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-12- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Rowe v. Bacigalluppi Cal. 1863 5 : 237

Bell v. Brown

Cal. 1863

5 : 240

Colman v. Clements

Cal. 1863

5 : 247

Depuy v. Williams

Cal. 1864

5 : 251

Bullion Co. v. Croesus Co.

Nev. 1866

5 : 254

Hebrard v. Jefferson Co.

Cal. 1867

5 : 270

Felger v. Coward

Cal. 1868

5 : 273

Rynd v. Rynd Farm Co.

Penna. 1869

5 : 275

Silver Mining Co. v. Fall

Nev. 1870

5 : 283

Karns v. Tanner

Penna. 1870

5 : 289

Herbert v. King

Mont. 1872

5 : 303

Schissler v. Chesshire

Nev. 1872

5 : 309

San Felipe Co. v. Belshaw

Cal. 1875

5 : 315

Sears v. Taylor

Colo. 1877

5 : 318

Union Co. v. Taylor

U.S. Nev. 1879

5 : 323

Murphy v. Cobb

Colo. 1880

5 : 330

Eminent Domain

(333)

Equity

(444)

Estoppel

484 - 586

Outram v. Morewood

U.K. 1803

5 : 484

Feversham v. Emerson

U.K. 1855

5 : 500

Mandlebaum v. North Amer. Co.

Mich. 1857

5 : 506

Green v. Prettyman

Cal. 1861

5 : 515

Troxell v. Lehigh Crane Co.

Penna. 1862

5 : 517

Pool v. Lewis

Georgia 1870

5 : 523

Marquart v. Bradford

Cal. 1872

5 : 528

Mercer Co. v. McKee’s Adm’r

Penna. 1874

5 : 531

Wickersham v. Chicago Zinc Co.

Kansas 1877

5 : 536

Patterson v. Hitchcock

Colo. 1877

5 : 542

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-13- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Stewart v. Munford Ill. 1878 5 : 555

Meyendorf v. Frohner

Mont. 1879

5 : 559

Evidence

(587)

Exception

(656)

Execution

(662)

Executors and Administrators

(670)

Exhausted Mine [subject added in Vol. 15]

---

Volume 6 (1885) Expert

(1)

Fault (geological)

22 - 33

Morris v. Smith

U.K. 1783

6 : 22

Davis v. Shepherd

U.K. 1865

6 : 24

Fixtures

(34)

Flooding

(129)

Flume

(203)

Forcible Entry

(210)

FORFEITURE [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

248 - 362

*

Territory v. Lee

Mont. 1874

6 : 248

Doe v. Bancks

U.K. 1821

6 : 278

Von Schmidt v. Huntington

Cal. 1850

6 : 284

Dutch Flat Co. v. Mooney

Cal. 1859

6 : 303

McKnight v. Kreutz

Penna. 1866

6 : 305

Kreutz v. McKnight

Penna. 1867

6 : 314

Stockbridge Co. v. Cone Iron Works

Mass. 1869

6 : 317

Wiseman v. McNulty

Cal. 1864

6 : 326

Westcott v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1871

6 : 336

Kinsman v. Jackson

U.K. 1880

6 : 352

Vanatta v. Brewer

N.J. 1880

6 : 358

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-14- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Volume 7 (1885) Fraud (continued from Vol. 6)

(1)

Gold Dust

(156)

Guaranty

(181)

Guardian and Ward

(189)

Highways

(193)

Incorporeal Hereditaments

203 - 236

Funk v. Haldeman

Mont. 1866

7 : 203

Grubb v. Grubb

Penna. 1873

7 : 226

Indian Reservation [subject added in Vol. 17]

---

Injunction [supplemented in Vol. 15]

237 - 638

*

Irwin v. Davidson

No. Car. 1844

7 : 237

Bishop of London v. Web

U.K. 1718

7 : 247

Wentworth v. Turner

U.K. 1795

7 : 249

Mitchell v. Dors

U.K. 1801

7 : 250

Grey v. Duke of Northumberland

U.K. 1806

7 : 250

Grey v. Duke of Northumberland

U.K. 1810

7 : 251

Earl Cowper v. Baker

U.K. 1810

7 : 253

Thomas v. Oakley

U.K. 1811

7 : 254

Field v. Beaumont

U.K. 1818

7 : 257

Capner v. Flemington Co.

U.K. 1836

7 : 263

Bracken v. Preston

Wisc. 1845

7 : 267

Moore v. Ferrell

Georgia 1846

7 : 281

McBrayer v. Hardin

No. Car. 1850

7 : 288

Anderson v. Harvey’s Heirs

Virginia 1853

7 : 291

Boyle v. Laird

Wisc. 1853

7 : 301

Waldron v. Marsh

Cal. 1855

7 : 305

Smith v. City of Rome

Georgia 1855

7 : 306

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-15- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Merced Mining Co. v. Fremont(1)

Cal. 1857 7 : 309

Merced Mining Co. v. Fremont

(2)

Cal. 1857

7 : 313

Coker v. Simpson

Cal. 1857

7 : 330

Fremont v. Merced Mining Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1858

7 : 332

United States v. Parrott

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1858

7 : 335

Burnett v. Whitesides

Cal. 1859

7 : 407

Emmons v. McKesson

No. Car. 1859

7 : 409

Bill v. Sierra Nevada Co.

U.K. 1859

7 : 413

Eldridge v. Wright

Cal. 1860

7 : 418

Slade v. Sullivan

Cal. 1860

7 : 419

Brennan v. Gaston

(1)

Cal. 1861

7 : 424

Brennan v. Gaston

(2)

Cal. 1861

7 : 426

Daubenspeck v. Grear

Cal. 1861

7 : 429

Gillett v. Treganza

Wisc. 1861

7 : 432

Elwell v. Crowther

U.K. 1862

7 : 438

McLaughlin v. Kelly

Cal. 1863

7 : 445

Real del Monte Co. v. Pond Co.

Cal. 1863

7 : 452

More v. Massini

Cal. 1867

7 : 455

Mammoth Vein Co. Appeal

Penna. 1867

7 : 460

Munson v. Tryon

Penna. 1867

7 : 469

Lady Bryan G. & S.M. Co. v. Lady Bryan M. Co.

Nev. 1868

7 : 478

Schuylkill & D. Co. v. Schmoele

Penna. 1868

7 : 480

Sherman v. Clark

Nev. 1868

7 : 483

Lyon v. Woodman

Utah 1870

7 : 493

Cole Co. v. Virgina Co.

(1)

C.C.D. Nev. 1871

7 : 503

Cole Co. v. Virgina Co.

(2)

C.C.D. Nev. 1871

7 : 516

Higgins v. Barker

Cal. 1871

7 : 525

West Point Co. v. Reymert

N.Y. 1871

7 : 528

Lockwood v. Lunsford

Mo. 1874

7 : 532

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-16- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Magnet Co. v. Panaca Co. Nev. 1874 7 : 540

Lawrence and Others’ Appeal

Penna. 1875

7 : 542

Leitham v. Cusick

Utah 1875

7 : 546

Sierra Nevada Co. v. Sears

Nev. 1875

7 : 549

Old Telegraph Co. v. Cent’l Co.

Utah 1876

7 : 555

Efford v. South P. Coast RR Co.

Cal. 1877

7 : 557

Kahn v. Old Telegraph Co.

(1)

Utah 1877

7 : 559

Thorn v. Sweeney

Nev. 1877

7 : 564

Clegg v. Jones

Wisc. 1878

7 : 573

Edwards v. Allouez Co.

Mich. 1878

7 : 577

Rivers v. Burbank

Nev. 1878

7 : 583

Blaisdell v. Stephens

Nev. 1879

7 : 599

Central RR Co. v. Standard O. Co.

N.J. 1880

7 : 604

Newton v. Nock

U.K. 1880

7 : 611

Strelley v. Pearson

U.K. 1880

7 : 618

United RR Co. v. Standard O. Co.

N.J. 1880

7 : 625

Vanzandt v. Argentine Co. (Van Zandt)

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

7 : 634

Injunction Bond

(639)

Inspection (continued in Vol. 8)

(667)

Volume 8 (1885) Inspection (continued from Vol. 7)

(1)

Instroke

(52)

Insurance

(53)

Irrigation

(64)

Jurisdiction

(138)

Juror - Jury

(153)

Laches

(163)

Land

(301)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-17- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Lease (continued in Vol. 9) (316)

Volume 9 (1886) Lease (continued from Vol. 8)

(1)

Level

141 - 148

Clayton v. Gregson

U.K. 1835

9 : 141

Libel and Slander

(149)

License

(175)

Lien

(343)

LOCATION [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

429 - 560

*

Gleeson v. Martin White Co.

Nev. 1878

9 : 429

O’Keiffe v. Cunningham

Cal. 1858

9 : 451

Dunning v. Rankin

Cal. 1862

9 : 455

Table Mountain Co. v. Stranahan

Cal. 1862

9 : 457

Table Mountain Co. v. Stranahan

Cal. 1863

9 : 465

Van Valkenburg v. Huff

Nev. 1865

9 : 467

Chase v. Savage Co.

Nev. 1866

9 : 476

Zeckendorf v. Hutchinson

N. Mex. 1871

9 : 483

Sullivan v. Hense

Colo. 1874

9 : 487

Holland v. Mount Auburn Co.

Cal. 1878

9 : 497

Gelchich v. Moriarty

Cal. 1878

9 : 498

Johnson v. Buell

Colo. 1879

9 : 502

Blake v. Butte Co.

Utah c. 1877-80

9 : 503

McCormick v. Varnes

Utah c. 1878-80

9 : 505

Southern Cr. Co. v. Europa Co.

Nev. 1880

9 : 513

Faxon v. Barnard

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

9 : 515

Myers v. Spooner

Cal. 1880

9 : 519

North Noonday Co. v. Orient Co.

(1)

C.C.D. Cal. 1880

9 : 524

North Noonday Co. v. Orient Co.

(2)

C.C.D. Cal. 1880

9 : 529

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-18- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Miller v. Taylor Colo. 1881 9 : 547

Iron Silver Co. v. Cheeseman

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

9 : 552

LOCATION CERTIFICATE [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

561 - 577

*

Kramer v. Settle

Idaho 1873

9 : 561

Conner v. McPhee

Mont. 1868

9 : 570

Stapleton v. Pease

Mont. 1877

9 : 574

LODE [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

578 - 642

*

Eureka Co. v. Richmond Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1877

9 : 578

Brown v. ‘49 and ‘56 Quartz Co.

Cal. 1860

9 : 600

Foote v. National Co.

Mont. 1876

9 : 605

Flagstaff Co. v. Tarbet

U.S. Utah 1878

9 : 607

Tabor v. Dexter (Tabor v. Dexler)

C.C.D. Colo. 1878

9 : 614

Mount Diablo Co. v. Callison

C.C.D. Nev. 1879

9 : 616

Richmond Co. v. Eureka Co.

U.S. Nev. 1880

9 : 634

Lunatic

(643)

Mandamus

(659)

Married Women

(664)

Master and Servant (continued in Vol. 10)

(672)

Volume 10 (1886) Master and Servant (continued from Vol. 9)

(1)

Measure of Damages

(66)

Merger

(322)

Mexican Grant

334 - 369

Boggs v. Merced Co.

Cal. 1859

10 : 334

Ah He v. Crippen

Cal. 1861

10 : 367

MILL SITE

370 - 387

Robinson v. Imperial Co.

Nev. 1869

10 : 370

Mine(s)

388 - 397

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-19- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

* Spencer v. Scurr U.K. 1862 10 : 388

Rex v. Inhabitants of Sedgley

U.K. 1831

10 : 390

Westmoreland Coal Appeal

Penna. 1877

10 : 394

Mineral(s)

398 - 421

Earl of Rosse v. Wainman

U.K. 1845

10 : 398

Darvill v. Roper

U.K. 1855

10 : 406

Bell v. Wilson

U.K. 1866

10 : 415

Mineral Lands

422 - 427

Alford v. Barnum

Cal. 1873

10 : 422

McLaughlin v. Powell

Cal. 1875

10 : 424

Mineral Springs

(428)

Mistake

(434)

Mortgage

(525)

Natural Gas [subject added in Vol. 15]

---

Negligence (continued in Vol. 11)

(614)

Volume 11 (1887) Negligence (continued from Vol. 10)

(1)

Notice

(11)

Nuisance

(21)

Occupation

(98)

Oil

(103)

Option

(152)

Ore [supplemented in Vol. 16]

160 - 167

Blewett v. Coleman

Penna. 1861

11 : 160

Parties

(168)

Partition

(183)

Partnership

(223)

PATENT [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

608 - 697

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-20- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

* 420 Mining Co. v. Bullion Co. C.C.D. Nev. 1876 11 : 608

Fremont v. Seals

Cal. 1861

11 : 632

Gold Hill Co. v. Ish

Oregon 1873

11 : 635

McGarrahan v. New Idria Co.

Cal. 1874

11 : 641

Kahn v. Old Telegraph Co.

(2)

Utah 1877

11 : 645

McGarrahan v. New Idria Co.

U.S. Cal. 1877

11 : 665

St. Louis Smelting Co. v. Kemp

U.S. Colo. 1881

11 : 673

Personal Liability (continued in Vol. 12)

(698)

Volume 12 (1887) Personal Liability (continued from Vol. 11)

(1)

Personal Property

(62)

PLACERS [subject added in Vol. 15]

---

Pleading and Practice

(73)

POSSESSION

178 - 268

*

Harris v. Equator Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

12 : 178

Wild v. Holt

U.K. 1842

12 : 182

West v. Lanier

Tenn. 1849

12 : 184

Turner v. Reynolds

Penna. 1854

12 : 190

Fitzgerald v. Urton

Cal. 1855

12 : 198

Pennsylvania Co. v. Owens Co.

Cal. 1860

12 : 200

English v. Johnson

Cal. 1860

12 : 202

Lentz v. Victor

Cal. 1861

12 : 211

Hawxhurst v. Lander

Cal. 1865

12 : 214

Hess v. Winder

Cal. 1866

12 : 217

Gibson v. Puchta

Cal. 1867

12 : 227

Lavaroni v. Miller

Cal. 1867

12 : 232

Courchaine v. Bullion Co.

Nev. 1868

12 : 235

Hughes v. Devlin

Cal. 1863

12 : 241

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-21- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Maine Boys’ Co. v. Boston Co. Cal. 1869 12 : 247

Campbell v. Rankin

U.S. Mont. 1878

12 : 257

Phenix Co. v. Lawrence

Cal. 1880

12 : 261

Prescription

(269)

Prospecting Contract

(276)

Prospectus

(405)

PUBLIC DOMAIN

418 - 464

*

Moore v. Smaw (Fremont v. Flower)

Cal. 1861

12 : 418

Lorimier v. Lewis

Iowa 1843

12 : 437

McClintock v. Bryden

Cal. 1855

12 : 443

Burdge v. Smith

Cal. 1859

12 : 448

Morton v. State of Nebraska

U.S. Nebr. 1874

12 : 451

Quarries (Quarry)

465 - 469

Keeler v. Green

N.J. 1870

12 : 465

Quo Warranto

(512)

Railroads

(521)

Receiver

(568)

RECORD

602 - 608

Moxon v. Wilkinson

Mont. 1876

12 : 602

Flaherty v. Gwinn

Dakota 1878-79

12 : 605

Release

(609)

RELOCATION [supplemented in Vol. 15]

630 - 634

Gonu v. Russell

Mont. 1879

12 : 630

Rents and Royalties

(635)

Replevin (continued in Vol. 13)

(674)

Volume 13 (1888) Replevin (continued from Vol. 12)

(1)

Rescission

(8)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-22- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Reservation (40) Riparian Rights

(161)

Sale

(169)

Salines

(182)

School Lands

(195)

Severance [supplemented in Vol. 16]

225 - 258

*

Adams v. Briggs Co.

Mass. 1851

13 : 225

Rowe v. Grenfel

U.K. 1826

13 : 234

Stewart v. Chadwick

Iowa 1859

13 : 236

Buckley v. Howell

U.K. 1861

13 : 245

Armstrong v. Caldwell

Penna. 1866

13 : 252

Share - Shareholder

(259)

SIDE LINES [supplemented in Vol. 15]

282 - 291

Wolfley v. Lebanon Co.

Colo. 1878

13 : 282

Freeland v. Hoffman

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

13 : 289

Specific Performance

(292)

Springs

(374)

Statute of Frauds

(383)

Statute of Limitations

(408)

Stock - Stockholder

(435)

Surface

632 - 639

Williams v. Groucott

U.K. 1863

13 : 632

Surface Support (continued in Vol. 14)

640 - 703

Partridge v. Scott

U.K. 1838

13 : 640

Jeffries v. Williams

U.K. 1850

13 : 645

Nicklin v. Williams

U.K. 1854

13 : 650

Smart v. Morton

U.K. 1855

13 : 655

Dugdale v. Robertson

U.K. 1857

13 : 662

Haines v. Roberts

U.K. 1857

13 : 668

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-23- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Brown v. Robins

U.K. 1859

13 : 669

Backhouse v. Bonomi

U.K. 1861

13 : 677

Williams v. Bagnall

U.K. 1866

13 : 686

Jones v. Wagner

Penna. 1870

13 : 690

Smith v. Darby

U.K. 1872

13 : 695

Volume 14 (1888) Surface Support (continued from Vol. 13)

1 - 71

Horner v. Watson

Penna. 1875

14 : 1

Coleman v. Chadwick

Penna. 1876

14 : 9

Birmingham v. Allen

U.K. 1876

14 : 14

Wilson v. Waddell

U.K. 1876

14 : 25

Yards v. Wright

Ind. 1879

14 : 32

Gilmore v. Driscoll

Mass. 1877

14 : 37

Scranton v. Phillips

Penna. 1880

14 : 48

Wilms v. Jess

Ill. 1880

14 : 56

Davis v. Treharne

U.K. 1881

14 : 60

Tailings [supplemented in Vol. 16]

72 - 102

Jones v. Jackson

Cal. 1858

14 : 72

Bell v. Schultz

Cal. 1861

14 : 77

Lincoln v. Rogers

Mont. 1870

14 : 79

Rogers v. Cooney

Nev. 1872

14 : 85

Gregory v. Harris

Cal. 1872

14 : 91

Robinson v. Black Diamond Coal Co.

Cal. 1875

14 : 93

Keyes v. Little York Co.

Cal. 1879

14 : 95

Tax

(103)

Tenant(s) in Common

(221)

Tenant(s) for Life

(358)

Timber

(371)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-24- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Time (389) Tin Streaming

(397)

Townsite [subject added in Volume 17]

---

Trespass [supplemented in Vols. 15 and 16]

403 - 471

United States v. Gear

C.C.D. Ill. 1845

14 : 403

Baker v. King

Penna. 1851

14 : 404

Shoenberger v. Baker

Penna. 1853

14 : 412

Shaw v. Wallace

N.J. 1856

14 : 420

McCarron. v. O’Connell

Cal. 1857

14 : 429

Rowe v. Bradley

Cal. 1859

14 : 431

Henshaw v. Clark

Cal. 1859

14 : 434

Dundas v. Muhlenberg’s Exec’rs

Penna. 1860

14 : 437

Ensminger v. McIntire

Cal. 1863

14 : 440

Roberts v. Rose

U.K. 1865

14 : 441

Johnson v. Lamping

Cal. 1867

14 : 450

Douty v. Bird

Penna. 1869

14 : 454

Yahoola River Co. v. Irby

Georgia 1869

14 : 460

Hugunin v. McCunniff

Colo. 1874

14 : 463

Raffetto v. Fiori

Cal. 1875

14 : 469

Trover

(472)

Trust(s)

(522)

Tunnel(s) [supplemented in Vol. 16]

612 - 622

*

Corning Tunnel Co. v. Pell

Colo. 1878

14 : 612

McAndrews v. Tippett

N.J. 1876

14 : 616

Vendor and Purchaser (continued in Vol. 15)

(623)

Volume 15 (1889) Vendor and Purchaser (continued from Vol. 14)

(1)

Ventilation

(6)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-25- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Wages (47) Warranty

(70)

Waste

(109)

Water

(162)

Way

(215)

Wieghts and Measures

(243)

Workings [supplemented in Vols. 15 (at 695) and 16]

255 - 283

Quarrington v. Arthur

U.K. 1842

15 : 255

Tiley v. Moyers

Penna. 1855

15 : 259

Shafto v. Johnson

U.K. 1863

15 : 262

Lewis v. Fothergill

U.K. 1869

15 : 271

Daniels v. Hilgard

Ill. 1875

15 : 280

Supplemental Authorities - Chronologically by Topics ABANDONMENT [supplementing Vol. 1]

284 - 285

Taylor v. Middleton

Cal. 1885

15 : 284

ADVERSE CLAIM [supplementing Vol. 1]

286 - 323

Mont Blanc Co. v. Debour

Cal. 1882

15 : 286

Hopkins v. Noyes

Mont. 1883

15 : 287

Steel v. Gold Lead Co.

Nev. 1883

15 : 292

Rough v. Simmons

Cal. 1884

15 : 298

Rockwell v. Graham

Colo. 1885

15 : 299

McEvoy v. Hyman

(1)

C.C.D. Colo. 1885

15 : 300

Becker v. Pugh

Colo. 1886

15 : 304

Wolverton v. Nichols

U.S. Mont. 1886

15 : 309

Hamilton v. Southern Nevada Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1887

15 : 314

Aliens [supplementing Vol. 1]

324 - 328

Rosenthal v. Ives

Idaho 1887

15 : 324

ANNUAL LABOR [supplementing Vol. 1]

329 - 349

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-26- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

McGinnis v. Egbert Colo. 1884 15 : 329

DuPrat v. James

Cal. 1884

15 : 341

Renshaw v. Switzer

Mont. 1887

15 : 345

Pharis v. Muldoon

Cal. 1888

15 : 348

Assay

(350)

Bills and Notes

(355)

Boundaries [supplementing Vol. 2]

358 - 360

Leggatt v. Stewart

Mont. 1883

15 : 358

Contract

(360)

Conveyance

(378)

Corporation(s)

(380)

DESCRIPTION [supplementing Vol. 4]

392 - 403

Cullacott v. Cash Co.

Colo. 1884

15 : 392

McEvoy v. Hyman

(2)

C.C.D. Colo. 1885

15 : 397

DISCOVERY [supplementing Vol. 4]

404 - 414

Upton v. Larkin

Mont. 1888

15 : 404

Exhausted Mine [subject added in this Volume]

(415)

FORFEITURE [supplementing Vol. 6]

433 - 434

McCormick v. Rossi

Cal. 1886

15 : 433

Fraud

(435)

Injunction [supplementing Vol. 7]

447 - 452

Erhardt v. Boaro

(1)

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 447

Bullion B. Co. v. Eureka H. Co.

Utah 1887

15 : 449

Lease

(453)

LOCATION [supplementing Vol. 9]

458 - 507

Armstrong v. Lower

Colo. 1883

15 : 458

Eilers v. Boatman

Utah 1883

15 : 462

Eilers v. Boatman

U.S. Utah 1884

15 : 471

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-27- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Erhardt v. Boaro(2)

U.S. Colo. 1885 15 : 472

Gwillim v. Donnellan

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 482

Horswell v. Ruiz

Cal. 1885

15 : 488

Consolidated Republican Co. v. Lebanon Co.

Colo. 1886

15 : 490

Garthe v. Hart

Cal. 1887

15 : 492

Omar v. Soper

Colo. 1888

15 : 496

LOCATION CERTIFICATE [supplementing Vol. 9]

508 - 514

Russell v. Chumasero

Mont. 1882

15 : 508

Drummond v. Long

Colo. 1886

15 : 510

LODE [supplementing Vol. 9]

515 - 534

Pardee v. Murray

Mont. 1882

15 : 515

Hyman v. Wheeler

C.C.D. Colo. 1886

15 : 519

Master and Servant

(535)

Measure of Damages

(544)

Natural Gas [subject added in this Volume]

(556)

Negligence

(559)

Partnership

(562)

PATENT [supplementing Vol. 11]

575 - 590

Jeffords v. Hine

Ariz. 1886

15 : 575

Aurora Hill Co. v. 85 Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1888

15 : 581

PLACERS [subject added in this Volume]

591 - 616

Reynolds v. Iron Silver Co.

U.S. Colo. 1886

15 : 591

Gregory v. Pershbaker

Cal. 1887

15 : 602

Noyes v. Mantle

U.S. Mont. 1888

15 : 611

Prospecting Contract

(617)

RELOCATION [supplementing Vol. 12]

631 - 640

Armstrong v. Lower

Colo. 1882

15 : 631

[Strepey v. Stark (omitted)

Colo. 1884 see 17 : 28]

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-28- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Alexander v. Sherman Ariz. 1887 15 : 638 SIDE LINES [supplementing Vol. 13]

641 - 648

Iron Silver Co. v. Elgin Co.

U.S. Colo. 1886

15 : 641

Specific Performance

(649)

Trespass [supplementing Vol. 14]

655 - 674

Little Pitt. Co. v. L. Chf. Co.

Colo. 1888

15 : 655

Trust(s)

(675)

Vendor and Purchaser

(687)

Weights and Measures

(691)

Workings [supplementing Vol. 15 at p. 255]

695 - 710

Executors of Lord v. Carbon Iron Co.

N.J. 1884

15 : 695

Jones v. Robertson

Ill. 1886

15 : 703

Volume 16 (1894) ABANDONMENT [supplementing Vols. 1 and 15]

1 - 5

McCauley v. McKeig

Mont. 1889

16 : 1

ADVERSE CLAIM [supplementing Vols. 1 and 15]

6 - 15

Marshall Co. v. Kirtley

Colo. 1888

16 : 6

Steves v. Carson

C.C.D. Colo. 1890

16 : 12

Agent

(16)

Aliens [supplementing Vols. 1 and 15]

26 - 32

Anthony v. Jillson

Cal. 1890

16 : 26

ANNUAL LABOR [supplementing Vols. 1 and 15]

33 - 35

DeNoon v. Morrison

Cal. 1890

16 : 33

APEX [supplementing Vol. 1]

38 - 54

[Duggan v. Davey (omitted)

Dakota 1886 see 17 : 59]

[Argentine Co. v. Terrible Co. (omitted)

U.S. Colo. 1887 see 17 : 109]

King v. Amy & Silversmith Co.

Mont. 1890

16 : 38

Contract

(55)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-29- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

Corporation(s) (65) DIP [supplementing Vol. 4]

75 - 90

Pacific Coast Co. v. Spargo

C.C.D. Cal. 1883

16 : 75

Cheesman v. Shreve (Shreeve)

C.C.D. Colo. 1888

16 : 79

Montana Co. v. Clark

C.C.D. Mont. 1890

16 : 81

Dump [supplementing Vol. 5]

91 - 92

Appeal of Erwin

Penna. 1887

16 : 91

Fixtures

(93)

FORFEITURE [supplementing Vols. 6 and 15]

97 - 102

Sunday Lake Co. v. Wakefield

Wisc. 1888

16 : 97

Fraud

(103)

Lease

(108)

License

(116)

LOCATION [supplementing Vols. 9 and 15]

122 - 136

Thomas v. Chisholm

Colo. 1889

16 : 122

Hammer v. Garfield Co.

U.S. Mont. 1889

16 : 125

LOCATION CERTIFICATE [supplementing Vols. 9 and 15]

137 - 144

Metcalf v. Prescott

Mont. 1891

16 : 137

LODE [supplementing Vols. 9 and 15]

145 - 158

Champion Co. v. Consolidated Wyoming Co.

Cal. 1888

16 : 145

Lee v. Stahl

Colo. 1889

16 : 152

Measure of Damages

(159)

Natural Gas [subject added in Volume 15]

(165)

Negligence

(171)

Oil

(179)

Ore [supplementing Vol. 11]

184 - 200

Omaha & Grant Co. v. Tabor

Colo. 1889

16 : 184

Partnership

(201)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-30- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction and Date

Vol. : Page

PATENT [supplementing Vols. 11 and 15] 205 - 213

United States v. Marshall Co.

U.S. Colo. 1889

16 : 205

PLACERS [subject added in Vol. 15]

214 - 235

Dahl v. Raunheim

U.S. Mont. 1889

16 : 214

Iron Silver Co. v. Campbell

U.S. Colo. 1890

16 : 218

Prospecting Contract

(236)

Rents and Royalties

(239)

Severance [supplementing Vol. 13]

243 - 251

Williams v. Gibson

Alabama 1887

16 : 243

Tailings [supplementing Vol. 14]

252 - 259

Fuller v. Swan River Co.

Colo. 1888

16 : 252

Tenant(s) in Common

(260)

Trespass [supplementing Vols. 14 and 15]

263 - 275

Cheesman v. Hart

C.C.D. Colo. 1890

16 : 263

TUNNEL(S) [supplementing Vol. 14]

276 - 280

Bennett v. Shaughnessy

Utah 1889

16 : 276

Vendor and Purchaser

(281)

Workings [supplementing Vols. 14 at 255 and 15 at 695]

288 - 290

Miller v. Chester Slate Co.

Penna. 1889

16 : 288

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-31- June 2000

OUTLINE OF THE SIX SUPPLEMENTAL VOLUMES

Volumes 17-22 (1903-1906)

This table, presenting useful supplemental cases in chronological order, ties those cases to the subject

heading lists given by Mr. Morrison at the beginning of each volume after the sixteenth volume. In this portion

of this Outline, no case is indexed unless identified as meeting the criteria for selection. All of the cases

appearing in these six volumes but not indexed here are, however, listed in the Appendix hereto expanding this

list of cases found in these volumes. Because the six supplemental volumes were never indexed cumulatively,

either with the original sixteen volumes or by themselves as a supplemental group, nor was a table of the

supplemental cases ever published in any form, this is arguably the most useful portion of this Outline. It has

therefore been cross-checked also against and expanded by the index-digest notes in the six supplemental

volumes. Heretofore, the table of cases in Volume 1 of the 1914 third edition of Judge Curtis Holbrook

Lindley’s treatise on Mines was the only source of citations to the cases in these six volumes, despite the fact

that it was not designed for that particular purpose and did not purport to list all such cases.

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-32- June 2000

III. TABLE OF CONTENTS OF THE

SIX SUPPLEMENTAL VOLUMES (17-22)

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Volume 17 (1903)

Volume 17 begins with cases omitted from the original sixteen-volume set. All of the cases in this and subsequent volumes are presented chronologically. Volume 16

ended with cases from mid-1890; Volume 17 caught up to that point near the middle of that volume.

Mineral(s)

Hext v. Gill

U.K. Cornwall 1872

17 : 1

Oil

(22)

RELOCATION

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Flooding

(40)

Barriers

National Co. v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1885

17 : 44

APEX

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

Rescission

(94)

Exhausted Mine

(105)

APEX

Argentine Co. v. Terrible Co.

U.S. Colo. 1887

17 : 109

Boundaries

(117)

Negligence

(123)

Ejectment

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

Drainage

(134)

Lease

(137)

Trover

(143)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-33- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Fault(geological)

Raisbeck v. Anthony

Wisc. 1888

17 : 148

Oil

(164)

Fraud

(169)

PLACERS

Freezer v. Sweeney

Mont. 1889

17 : 179

Mineral Lands

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

Workings

(194)

Agent

Schultz v. Keeler

Idaho 1889

17 : 198

DISTRICT RULES

Parley’s Park Co. v. Kerr

U.S. Utah 1889

17 : 201

PLACERS

White v. Lee

Cal. 1889

17 : 209

Fraud

(213)

Prospecting Contract

Miller v. Butterfield

Cal. 1889

17 : 222

Corporation(s)

(226)

License

(242)

Tenant(s) in Common

(246)

Lease

(253)

LODE

Cheesman v. Shreeve (Shreve)

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Way

(279)

Inspection

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana Co.

Mont. 1890

17 : 283

LOCATION

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-34- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Doe v. Sanger Cal. 1890 17 : 298 APEX

Gilpin v. Sierra Nevada M. Co.

Idaho 1890

17 : 310

LODE

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

Ore

(333)

ADVERSE CLAIM

Hunt v. Eureka Gulch M. Co.

Colo. 1890

17 : 340

Covenant

(348)

Consideration

(357)

Negligence

(362)

Ore

(367)

Forfeiture

(374)

Springs

(383)

Account

(388)

Injunction

(392)

Equity

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

ANNUAL LABOR

Honaker v. Martin

Mont. 1891

17 : 404

Way

(412)

Vendor and Purchaser

(425)

Natural Gas

(429)

PLACERS

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

Water

(449)

Partition

(458)

APEX

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-35- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Larkin v. Upton U.S. Mont. 1892 17 : 465 Blasting

(470)

Indian Reservation

Kendall v. San Juan Silver M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 475

Natural Gas

(481)

Measure of Damages

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

Conveyance

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

ADVERSE CLAIM

Hoffman v. Beecher

Mont. 1892

17 : 503

Trover

(515)

Lease

(523)

Lease

(526)

APEX

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

Oil

(543)

ADVERSE CLAIM

Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold M. Co.

Idaho 1893

17 : 548

Laches

(554)

LODE

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

DISCOVERY

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

ANNUAL LABOR

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

Conveyance

(600)

Way

(609)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-36- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

DISCOVERY

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

RELOCATION

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Injunction

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1893

17 : 658

LODE

Little Josephine Co. v. Fullerton

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 664

ANNUAL LABOR

Mills v. Fletcher

Cal. 1893

17 : 671

Injunction

(677)

Tenant(s) in Common

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

ANNUAL LABOR

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

Townsite

Dower v. Richards

U.S. Cal. 1894

17 : 704

Volume 18 (1903) Fraud

(1)

PLACERS

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

ADVERSE CLAIM

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

APEX

King v. Amy & Silversmith M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 76

Aliens

Manuel v. Wulff

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 85

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-37- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Oil (93) Contract

(98)

LODE

Consolidated Wyoming Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Townsite

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

Lease

(139)

Forfeiture

(145)

Forfeiture

(149)

Married Women

(153)

Abandonment

(158)

Master and Servant

(165)

Statute of Limitations

(179)

APEX

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

Conveyance

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

Oil

(202)

APEX

Last Chance M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

U.S. Idaho 1895

18 : 205

Aliens

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

LOCATION CERTIFICATE

Bennett v. Harkrader

U.S. Alaska 1895

18 : 224

Injunction

(231)

Prospecting Contract

Craw v. Wilson

Nev. 1895

18 : 244

Partnership

(247)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-38- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Statute of Frauds

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Forfeiture

(260)

LOCATION

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

Mineral(s)

(279)

Tenant(s) for Life

(289)

Injunction

(297)

END LINES

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

Tenant(s) in Common

(312)

Oil

(317)

Lease

(320)

Lease

(327)

Tenant(s) in Common

(331)

ADVERSE CLAIM

Girard v. Carson

Colo. 1896

18 : 346

Tenant(s) for Life

(350)

ABANDONMENT

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

Trust(s)

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

ADVERSE CLAIM

Perego v. Dodge

U.S. Utah 1896

18 : 364

Dower

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

Lease

(384)

Oil

(391)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-39- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Severance (395) Oil

(404)

ADVERSE CLAIM

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

ANNUAL LABOR

Royston v. Miller

C.C.D. Nev. 1896

18 : 418

Negligence

(433)

PLACERS

Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

Exhausted Mine

(462)

Vendor and Purchaser

(466)

ABANDONMENT

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

Oil

(478)

Rescission

(485)

Oil

(500)

Confusion

(523)

LOCATION

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

Forfeiture

(542)

Tenant(s) for Life

(548)

Lease

(552)

PATENT

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

APEX

Republican M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1897

18 : 564

APEX

Catron v. Old

Colo. 1897

18 : 569

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-40- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Ejectment

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

PATENT

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

Fraud

(608)

Inspection

(614)

Dump

(616)

KNOWN LODE

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

Trespass

(639)

Estoppel

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

TUNNEL(S)

Enterprise M. Co. v. Rico-Aspen Co.

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 661

Campbell v. Ellet

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 669

Oil

(674)

Agricultural Land(s)

United States v. Blackburn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 684

Appropriation

(689)

Trespass

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

Volume 19 (1904) LODE

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

Waste

(19)

Prospecting Contract

(56)

Contract

(62)

LODE

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-41- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

Townsite

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

Eminent Domain

(96)

Rents and Royalties

(102)

APEX

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

Relation

(137)

Lease

(146)

Lease

(153)

Oil

(157)

Reservation

(169)

PATENT

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1897

19 : 186

Ditch

(193)

Exhausted Mine

(197)

Lease

(205)

Abandonment

(210)

Oil

(213)

Title Bond

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

Prospecting Contract

(227)

MILL SITE

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

Ditch

(243)

Parties

(247)

Quiet Title

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-42- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Blasting (264) LOCATION

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

POSSESSION

Hamilton v. Huson

Mont. 1898

19 : 274

Water

(279)

ANNUAL LABOR

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nevada Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Conveyance

(297)

Partnership

(304)

Rents and Royalties

(310)

Oil

(315)

Oil

(326)

Ore

(339)

Lien

(342)

Dump

(349)

LODE

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

APEX

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

PATENT

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

Stock

(431)

Statute of Frauds

(470)

Conveyance

Boston & Montana Co. v. Montana O.P. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

LODE

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-43- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Mexican Grant

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

Receiver

(515)

Injunction Bond

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 525

Level

(539)

Lease

(544)

Trust(s)

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

Eminent Domain

(566)

PUBLIC DOMAIN

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1898

19 : 575

Lease

(584)

Lease

(593)

Merger

(605)

Evidence

(609)

RELOCATION

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

LOCATION CERTIFICATE

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Instroke

(639)

LOCATION

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

LOCATION

Sanders v. Noble

Mont. 1899

19 : 650

Lease

(682)

LAND OFFICE

Basin M. & C. Co. v. White

Mont. 1899

19 : 690

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-44- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

PLACERS

Mt. Rosa M., M. & L. Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

Specific Performance

(708)

Volume 20 (1905) Injunction

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1899

20 : 1

ABANDONMENT

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

Injunction

(19)

Measure of Damages

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consolidated Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

Laches

(35)

Injunction

(49)

RELOCATION

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

Mortgage

(66)

Tax

(76)

PLACERS

Durant v. Corbin

C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899

20 : 84

Ore

(89)

School Lands

(93)

LOCATION

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

Estoppel

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

DISTRICT RULES

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-45- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Contract (142) LOCATION

Madden v. Connell

Canada Br. Col. 1899

20 : 158

Oil

(160)

Lease

(174)

Lease

(177)

Lease

(182)

Broker

(186)

CROSS LODE

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

Partnership

(222)

Lease

(234)

Lease

(260)

Way

(263)

LOCATION CERTIFICATE

Muldoon v. Brown

Utah 1899

20 : 269

Nuisance

(274)

DISCOVERY

Nevada Sierra Oil Co. v. Home Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

ADVERSE CLAIM

Murray v. Polglase

Mont. 1899

20 : 296

Mineral Lands

(314)

APEX

Roxanna Gold M. & T. Co. v. Cone

C.C.D. Colo. 1899

20 : 323

Trust(s)

(330)

Natural Gas

(335)

Oil

(338)

Oil

(345)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-46- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Oil (350) ADVERSE CLAIM

Blackburn v. Portland Gold M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1900

20 : 358

Oil

(377)

Lease

(393)

Receiver

(399)

POSSESSION

Risch v. Wiseman

Oregon 1900

20 : 409

Abandonment

(412)

Specific Performance

(419)

Rents and Royalties

(428)

Lease

(432)

APEX

Empire Milling Co. v. Tombstone Co.

C.C.D. Conn. 1900

20 : 443

Negligence

(452)

Lien

(461)

Natural Gas

(466)

Contempt

(492)

APEX

Cosmopolitan M. Co. v. Foote

C.C.D. Nev. 1900

20 : 497

Conveyance

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

20 : 507

Mechanics’ Liens

(518)

RELOCATION

Duncan v. Fulton

Colo. App. 1900

20 : 522

Lease

(540)

Fraud

(545)

Prospecting Contract

(553)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-47- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Negligence (573) DISCOVERY SHAFT

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Fixtures

(620)

Surface Support

(636)

Reservation

(649)

FORFEITURE

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Natural Gas

(672)

Tailings

(688)

Mineral Lands

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

Boundaries

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

Tenant(s) in Common

(734)

Injunction

(738)

Volume 21 (1905) LOCATION CERTIFICATE

Wells v. Davis

Utah 1900

21 : 1

LOCATION CERTIFICATE

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

LOCATION CERTIFICATE

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

LOCATION

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

Tenant(s) in Common(adverse)

Malaby v. Rice

Colo. App. 1900

21 : 29

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-48- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

ABANDONMENT

Niles v. Kennan

Colo. 1900

21 : 33

Nuisance

(38)

SIDE LINES

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

Appurtenances

North American E. Co. Ltd. v. Adams

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 65

Corporations(s)

(74)

Tenant(s) for Life

(81)

Trespass

(91)

ADVERSE CLAIM

Johnson v. Munday

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 96

Injunction

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1900

21 : 98

Natural Gas

(102)

Forfeiture

(106)

DISCOVERY SHAFT

Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. M. Co.

U.S. Utah 1900

21 : 113

Assay

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

TUNNEL(S)

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

Tax

(131)

Natural Gas

(139)

Specific Performance

(143)

Statute of Limitations

Peabody Gold Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

TUNNEL(S)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-49- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Brewster v. Shoemaker Colo. 1900 21 : 155 APEX

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

Forfeiture

(179)

Surface Support

(188)

Natural Gas

(194)

License

(198)

LOCATION

Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

ANNUAL LABOR

Wright v. Killian

Cal. 1901

21 : 211

Trust(s)

(220)

APEX

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1901

21 : 232

Master and Servant

(243)

Fraud

(252)

Reservation

(263)

Oil

(275)

Injunction

Maloney v. King

Mont. 1901

21 : 278

MILL SITE

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

LOCATION

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

TOWNSITE

Regan v. Whittaker

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 309

APEX

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-50- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. Fraud

(333)

Instroke

(358)

Lien

(368)

PATENT

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

LOCATION

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Natural Gas

(401)

Quiet Title

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

Vendor and Purchaser

(412)

Mineral(s)

(425)

Vendor and Purchaser

(443)

Quiet Title

(450)

Tailings

(452)

Lease

(460)

ANNUAL LABOR

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

LOCATION

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

LOCATION

Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

Mineral(s)

(489)

Fixtures

(496)

Workings

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson

Colo. App. 1901

21 : 499

Lien

(503)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-51- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

FORFEITURE

Elder v. Horseshoe M. & M. Co.

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 510

Lease

(513)

Surface Support

(517)

Partnership

(532)

KNOWN LODE

Cranes Gulch M. Co. v. Scherrer

Cal. 1901

21 : 549

Negligence

(555)

DISCOVERY

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

Injunction

(586)

Statute of Limitations

Peabody Gold Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

Oil

(600)

Measure of Damages

(605)

Oil

(611)

Fixtures

(619)

Estoppel

(626)

Stock

(629)

Mineral Lands

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

RELOCATION

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

Estoppel

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

DISCOVERY

Tuolumne Consol. M. Co. v. Maier

Cal. 1901

21 : 678

Oil

(683)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-52- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

RECORD

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Vendor and Purchaser

(695)

Water

(699)

Strikes

(708)

FORFEITURE

Haynes v. Briscoe

Colo. 1901

21 : 720

Water

(725)

PLACERS

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co.

U.S. Alaska 1902

21 : 730

Lease

(741)

Surface Support

(745)

Oil

(754)

Oil

(760)

Volume 22 (1906) Instroke

(1)

Tenant(s) in Common

Cedar Canyon M. Co. v. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

Specific Performance

(25)

Option

(32)

Oil

(42)

LOCATION

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Timber

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

Inspection

(61)

RELOCATION

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-53- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Morrison v. Regan Idaho 1902 22 : 69 Tenant(s) in Common

(86)

Townsite

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

APEX

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 104

Exhausted Mine

(111)

Lost Paper(s)(deed from locator)

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

TUNNEL(S)

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

APEX

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 132

RELOCATION

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

Oil

(145)

Injunction

(164)

Forfeiture

(171)

Mechanics’ Liens

(179)

Measure of Damages

Wilkins v. Monson Consol. Slate Co.

Me. 1902

22 : 185

Measure of Damages

(189)

Inspection

State ex rel. Heinze v. District Court

Mont. 1902

22 : 195

Expert

(204)

Inspection

(211)

Negligence

(213)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-54- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Rents and Royalties (229) Mineral(s)

(233)

Partnership

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

Injunction

(259)

Option

(263)

Oil

(269)

FORFEITURE

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Forfeiture

(293)

RECEIVER’S RECEIPT

Bash v. Cascade M. Co.

Wash. 1902

22 : 299

LODE

Pennsylvania Co. v. Grass Valley Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1902

22 : 306

Conveyance

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

APEX

Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

RELOCATION

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Measure of Damages

United States v. Homestake M. Co.

8th Cir. S.D. 1902

22 : 365

Measure of Damages

(382)

Injunction

(389)

RELOCATION

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

LOCATION

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Ore. 1902

22 : 414

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-55- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Specific Performance (429) ADVERSE CLAIM

Pennsylvania M. Co. v. Bales

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 436

PROTEST

Neilson v. Champagne M. & M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 438

TUNNEL(S)

Uinta Tunnel Co. v. Creede & C.C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

Exhausted Mine

(456)

Wages

(462)

Stock

Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

Quiet Title

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

Natural Gas

(507)

Conveyance

(515)

Custom

(523)

Account

(527)

LAND OFFICE

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Lease

(545)

Injunction

(550)

APEX

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1903

22 : 555

Quiet Title

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

Escrow

(569)

EJECTMENT

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-56- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Davis v. Shepherd Colo. 1903 22 : 575 APEX

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey

Colo. 1903

22 : 585

Contract

(595)

Fraud

(601)

ADVERSE CLAIM

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Rents and Royalties

(626)

Prospectus

(630)

Oil

(647)

Lease

(656)

Fraud

(672)

Agent

(677)

Forfeiture

(680)

LOCATION

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alas. 1903

22 : 688

Vendor and Purchaser

(709)

PROSPECT

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-57- June 2000

IV. ALPHABETICAL INDEX TO PRINCIPAL CASES, VOLUMES 1-22

The following Tables provide the only known combined indices to all of the principal cases in all twenty-two

volumes. Many of these cases are not available in the modern reporter systems.

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Adams v. Briggs Co.

Mass. 1851

13 : 225

Ah He v. Crippen

Cal. 1861

10 : 367

Ah Pong, Ex parte

Cal. 1861

1 : 507

Ah Yew v. Choate

Cal. 1864

1 : 492

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey

Colo. 1903

22 : 585

Alexander v. Sherman

Ariz. 1887

15 : 638

Alford v. Barnum

Cal. 1873

10 : 422

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

Anderson v. Harvey’s Heirs

Virginia 1853

7 : 291

Anthony v. Jullson

Cal. 1890

16 : 26

Appeal of Erwin

Penna. 1887

16 : 91

Argentine Co. v. Terrible Co.

U.S. Colo. 1887

17 : 109

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

Armstrong v. Caldwell

Penna. 1866

13 : 252

Armstrong v. Lower

Colo. 1882

15 : 631

Armstrong v. Lower

Colo. 1883

15 : 458

Atkins v. Hendree

Idaho 1867

2 : 328

Attwood v. Fricot

Cal. 1860

2 : 305

Aurora Hill Co. v. 85 Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1888

15 : 581

Backhouse v. Bonomi

U.K. 1861

13 : 677

Baird v. Williamson

U.K. 1863

4 : 368

Baker v. King

Penna. 1851

14 : 404

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-58- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Bash v. Cascade M. Co. Wash. 1902 22 : 299 Basin M. & C. Co. v. White

Mont. 1899

19 : 690

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Becker v. Pugh

Colo. 1886

15 : 304

Belk v. Meagher

Mont. 1878

1 : 522

Belk v. Meagher

U.S. Mont. 1881

1 : 510

Bell v. Bed Rock Co.

Cal. 1868

1 : 45

Bell v. Brown

Cal. 1863

5 : 240

Bell v. Schultz

Cal. 1861

14 : 77

Bell v. Wilson

U.K. 1866

10 : 415

Bennett v. Harkrader

U.S. Alaska 1895

18 : 224

Bennett v. Shaughnessy

Utah 1889

16 : 276

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

Bill v. Sierra Nevada Co.

U.K. 1859

7 : 413

Birmingham v. Allen

U.K. 1876

14 : 14

Bishop of London v. Web

U.K. 1718

7 : 247

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

Blackburn v. Portland Gold M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1900

20 : 358

Blaisdell v. Stephens

Nev. 1879

7 : 599

Blake v. Butte Co.

Utah c. 1877-80

9 : 503

Blewett v. Coleman

Penna. 1861

11 : 160

Boggs v. Merced Co.

Cal. 1859

10 : 334

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Boston & Mont. Co. v. Montana O. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

Boyle v. Laird

Wisc. 1853

7 : 301

Bracken v. Preston

Wisc. 1845

7 : 267

Bradley v. Lee

Cal. 1869

4 : 470

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-59- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Brandow v. Pocotillo Co. Nev. 1870 4 : 337 Brandt v. Wheaton

Cal. 1877

1 : 145

Brennan v. Gaston

(1)

Cal. 1861

7 : 424

Brennan v. Gaston

(2)

Cal. 1861

7 : 426

Brewster v. Shoemaker

Colo. 1900

21 : 155

Brown v. ‘49 and ‘56 Quartz Co.

Cal. 1860

9 : 600

Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

Brown v. Robins

U.K. 1859

13 : 669

Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson

Colo. App. 1901

21 : 499

Buckley v. Howell

U.K. 1861

13 : 245

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Bullion B. Co. v. Eureka H. Co.

Utah 1887

15 : 449

Bullion Co. v. Croesus Co.

Nev. 1866

5 : 254

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State-Idaho Mining

& Developing Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

Burdge v. Smith

Cal. 1859

12 : 448

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

Burke v. Table Mountain Co.

Cal. 1859

5 : 209

Burnett v. Whitesides

Cal. 1859

7 : 407

Busenius v. Coffee

Cal. 1859

5 : 214

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

Campbell v. Ellet

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 669

Campbell v. Rankin

U.S. Mont. 1878

12 : 257

Capner v. Flemington Co.

U.K. 1836

7 : 263

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-60- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Catron v. Old Colo. 1897 18 : 569 Cedar Canyon M. Co. v. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

Cent’l RR Co. v. Stand’d O. Co.

N.J. 1880

7 : 604

Cerrusite M. Co. v. Steele

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 462

Champion Co. v. Consolidated Wyo. Co.

Cal. 1888

16 : 145

Chapman v. Toy Long

Oregon 1876

1 : 497

Chase v. Savage Co.

Nev. 1866

9 : 476

Cheesman v. Hart

C.C.D. Colo. 1890

16 : 263

Cheesman v. Shreeve (Shreve)

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Cheesman v. Shreve (Shreeve)

C.C.D. Colo. 1888

16 : 79

Clayton v. Gregson

U.K. 1835

9 : 141

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

Clegg v. Jones

Wisc. 1878

7 : 573

Clement v. Youngman

Penna. 1861

5 : 230

Coker v. Simpson

Cal. 1857

7 : 330

Cole Co. v. Virginia Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1871

7 : 503

Cole Co. v. Virginia Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1871

7 : 516

Coleman v. Chadwick

Penna. 1876

14 : 9

Colman v. Clements

Cal. 1863

5 : 247

Comyn v. Kyneto

U.K. 2 James I c.1604

5 : 198

Conner v. McPhee

Mont. 1868

9 : 570

Consol. Rep. Co. v. Lebanon Co.

Colo. 1886

15 : 490

Consolidated Wyo. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

Corning Tunnel Co. v. Pell

Colo. 1878

14 : 612

Correa v. Frietas

Cal. 1871

2 : 336

Coryell v. Cain

Cal. 1860

5 : 226

Cosmopolitan M. Co. v. Foote

C.C.D. Nev. 1900

20 : 497

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-61- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co. 9th Cir. Cal. 1901 21 : 633 Courchaine v. Bullion Co.

Nev. 1868

12 : 235

Cranes Gulch M. Co. v. Scherrer

Cal. 1901

21 : 549

Craw v. Wilson

Nev. 1895

18 : 244

Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold M. Co.

Idaho 1893

17 : 548

Crossman v. Pendery

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 431

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

Cullacott v. Cash Co.

Colo. 1884

15 : 392

Dahl v. Raunheim

U.S. Mont. 1889

16 : 214

Daniels v. Hilgard

Ill. 1875

15 : 280

Darvill v. Roper

U.K. 1855

10 : 406

Daubenspeck v. Grear

Cal. 1861

7 : 429

Davis v. Butler

Cal. 1856

1 : 7

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

Davis v. Shepherd

U.K. 1865

6 : 24

Davis v. Treharne

U.K. 1881

14 : 60

Dean etc. of Ely v. Warren

U.K. 1741

4 : 233

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

DeNoon v. Morrison

Cal. 1890

16 : 33

Depuy v. Williams

Cal. 1864

5 : 251

Derry v. Ross

Colo. 1881

1 : 1

Dexter Co. v. Dexter

R.I. 1859

4 : 291

Dodge v. Marden

Oregon 1879

1 : 63

Doe v. Bancks

U.K. 1821

6 : 278

Doe v. Sanger

Cal. 1890

17 : 298

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

Dougherty v. Cleary

Cal. 1866

1 : 35

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-62- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Douty v. Bird Penna. 1869 14 : 454 Dower v. Richards

U.S. Cal. 1894

17 : 704

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

Drummond v. Long

Colo. 1886

15 : 510

Dugdale v. Robertson

U.K. 1857

13 : 662

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

Duncan v. Fulton

Colo. App. 1900

20 : 522

Dundas v. Muhlenberg’s Exec’rs

Penna. 1860

14 : 437

Dunning v. Rankin

Cal. 1862

9 : 455

DuPrat v. James

Cal. 1884

15 : 341

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consol. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

Durant v. Corbin

C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899

20 : 84

Dutch Flat Co. v. Mooney

Cal. 1859

6 : 303

Eagan v. Delaney

Cal. 1860

5 : 223

Earl Cowper v. Baker

U.K. 1810

7 : 253

Earl of Rosse v. Wainman

U.K. 1845

10 : 398

Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

Edwards v. Allouez Co.

Mich. 1878

7 : 577

Efford v. South P. Coast RR Co.

Cal. 1877

7 : 557

Eilers v. Boatman

Utah 1883

15 : 462

Eilers v. Boatman

U.S. Utah 1884

15 : 471

Elder v. Horseshoe M. & M. Co.

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 510

Eldridge v. Wright

Cal. 1860

7 : 418

Elwell v. Crowther

U.K. 1862

7 : 438

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

Emmons v. McKesson

No. Car. 1859

7 : 409

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining &

Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 104

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining &

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 132

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-63- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Concentrating Co. Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining &

Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

Empire Milling Co. v. Tombstone Co.

C.C.D. Conn. 1900

20 : 443

English v. Johnson

Cal. 1860

12 : 202

Ensminger v. McIntire

Cal. 1863

14 : 440

Enterprise M. Co. v. Rico-Aspen Co.

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 661

Erhardt v. Boaro

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 432

Erhardt v. Boaro

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 434

Erhardt v. Boaro

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 447

Erhardt v. Boaro

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 472

Eureka Co. v. Richmond Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1877

9 : 578

Ex parte Ah Pong

Cal. 1861

1 : 507

Ex’rs of Lord v. Carbon Co.

N.J. 1884

15 : 695

Faxon v. Barnard

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

9 : 515

Felger v. Coward

Cal. 1868

5 : 273

Ferron v. Sturgeon

Iowa 1859

4 : 319

Feversham v. Emerson

U.K. 1855

5 : 500

Field v. Beaumont

U.K. 1818

7 : 257

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

Fitzgerald v. Urton

Cal. 1855

12 : 198

Flagstaff Co. v. Tarbet

U.S. Utah 1878

9 : 607

Flaherty v. Gwinn

Dakota 1878-79

12 : 605

Foote v. National Co.

Mont. 1876

9 : 605

420 Co. v. Bullion Co.

Nev. 1874

1 : 114

Frank Co. v. Larimer Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

1 : 150

Freeland v. Hoffman

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

13 : 289

Freezer v. Sweeney

Mont. 1889

17 : 179

Fremont v. Flower (see Moore v. Smaw, below)

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-64- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Fremont v. Merced Mining Co. C.C.D. Cal. 1858 7 : 332 Fremont v. Seals

Cal. 1861

11 : 632

Fuller v. Swan River Co.

Colo. 1888

16 : 252

Funk v. Haldeman

Mont. 1866

7 : 203

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

Garthe v. Hart

Cal. 1887

15 : 492

Gelchich v. Moriarty

Cal. 1878

9 : 498

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

Gibson v. Puchta

Cal. 1867

12 : 227

Gillan v. Hutchinson

Cal. 1860

2 : 317

Gillett v. Treganza

Wisc. 1861

7 : 432

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

Gilmore v. Driscoll

Mass. 1877

14 : 37

Gilpin v. Sierra Nevada M. Co.

Idaho 1890

17 : 310

Girard v. Carson

Colo. 1896

18 : 346

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

Gleeson v. Martin White Co.

Nev. 1878

9 : 429

Gold Hill Co. v. Ish

Oregon 1873

11 : 635

Golden Fleece Co. v. Cable Co.

Nev. 1877

1 : 120

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

Golden Terra Co. v. Mahler

Dakota 1879

4 : 390

Gonu v. Russell

Mont. 1879

12 : 630

Goodright v. Swymmer

U.K. 1756

5 : 200

Gore v. McBrayer

Cal. 1861

1 : 645

Gottschall v. Melsing

Nev. 1866

1 : 667

Green v. Prettyman

Cal. 1861

5 : 515

Gregory v. Harris

Cal. 1872

14 : 91

Gregory v. Pershbaker

Cal. 1887

15 : 602

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-65- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Grey v. Duke of Northumberland U.K. 1806 7 : 250 Grey v. Duke of Northumberland

U.K. 1810

7 : 251

Grubb v. Grubb

Penna. 1873

7 : 226

Gwillim v. Donnellan

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 482

Haines v. Roberts

U.K. 1857

13 : 668

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

Hamilton v. Huson

Mont. 1898

19 : 274

Hamilton v. Southern Nev. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1887

15 : 314

Hammer v. Garfield Co.

U.S. Mont. 1889

16 : 125

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

Harris v. Equator Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

12 : 178

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

Harvey v. Ryan

Cal. 1872

4 : 490

Hawxhurst v. Lander

Cal. 1865

12 : 214

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

Haynes v. Briscoe

Colo. 1901

21 : 720

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

Hebrard v. Jefferson Co.

Cal. 1867

5 : 270

Henshaw v. Clark

Cal. 1859

14 : 434

Herbert v. King

Mont. 1872

5 : 303

Hess v. Winder

Cal. 1866

12 : 217

Hext v. Gill

U.K. Cornwall 1872

17 : 1

Higgins v. Barker

Cal. 1871

7 : 525

Hoffman v. Beecher

Mont. 1892

17 : 503

Holland v. Mount Auburn Co.

Cal. 1878

9 : 497

Honaker v. Martin

Mont. 1891

17 : 404

Hopkins v. Noyes

Mont. 1883

15 : 287

Horner v. Watson

Penna. 1875

14 : 1

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-66- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Horswell v. Ruiz Cal. 1885 15 : 488 Houtz v. Gisborn

Utah 1874

2 : 340

Huffman v. Hummer

N.J. 1866

2 : 242

Hughes v. Devlin

Cal. 1863

12 : 241

Hugunin v. McCunniff

Colo. 1874

14 : 463

Hunt v. Eureka Gulch M. Co.

Colo. 1890

17 : 340

Hyman v. Wheeler

C.C.D. Colo. 1886

15 : 519

Iron Silver Co. v. Campbell

U.S. Colo. 1890

16 : 218

Iron Silver Co. v. Cheeseman

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

9 : 552

Iron Silver Co. v. Elgin Co.

U.S. Colo. 1886

15 : 641

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

Iron Silver Co. v. Murphy

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

1 : 548

Irwin v. Davidson

No. Car. 1844

7 : 237

Jackson v. Olitz

N.Y. 1832

5 : 202

Jeffords v. Hine

Ariz. 1886

15 : 575

Jeffries v. Williams

U.K. 1850

13 : 645

Johnson v. Buell

Colo. 1879

9 : 502

Johnson v. Lamping

Cal. 1867

14 : 450

Johnson v. Munday

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 96

Johnson v. Parks

Cal. 1858

4 : 316

Johnston v. Shelton

No. Car. 1845

4 : 308

Jones v. Jackson

Cal. 1858

14 : 72

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

Jones v. Robertson

Ill. 1886

15 : 703

Jones v. Wagner

Penna. 1870

13 : 690

Jupiter Co. v. Bodie C. Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1881

4 : 411

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

Kahn v. Old Telegraph Co.

(1)

Utah 1877

7 : 559

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-67- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Kahn v. Old Telegraph Co.(2)

Utah 1877 11 : 645 Kamphouse v. Gaffner

Ill. 1874

2 : 257

Karns v. Tanner

Penna. 1870

5 : 289

Keeler v. Green

N.J. 1870

12 : 465

Kendall v. San Juan Silver M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 475

Keyes v. Little York Co.

Cal. 1879

14 : 95

King v. Amy & Silversmith Co.

Mont. 1890

16 : 38

King v. Amy & Silversmith M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 76

King v. Edwards

Mont. 1870

4 : 480

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

Kinsman v. Jackson

U.K. 1880

6 : 352

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Kramer v. Settle

Idaho 1873

9 : 561

Kreutz v. McKnight

Penna. 1867

6 : 314

Lady Bryan Co. v. Lady B. Co.

Nev. 1868

7 : 478

Lampe v. Kennedy

Wisc. 1878

2 : 266

Larkin v. Upton

U.S. Mont. 1892

17 : 465

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

Last Chance M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

U.S. Idaho 1895

18 : 205

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Lavaroni v. Miller

Cal. 1867

12 : 232

Lawrence and Others’ Appeal

Penna. 1875

7 : 542

Leadville Co. v. Fitzgerald

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

4 : 380

Lee v. Stahl

Colo. 1889

16 : 152

Leet v. John Dare Co.

Nev. 1870

4 : 487

Leggatt v. Stewart

Mont. 1883

15 : 358

Leitham v. Cusick

Utah 1875

7 : 546

Lentz v. Victor

Cal. 1861

12 : 211

Lewis v. Fothergill

U.K. 1869

15 : 271

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-68- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Lincoln v. Rogers Mont. 1870 14 : 79 Little Gunnell Co. v. Kimber

Colo. 1878

1 : 536

Little Josephine Co. v. Fullerton

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 664

Little Pitt. Co. v. L. Chf. Co.

Colo. 1888

15 : 655

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

Lockwood v. Lunsford

Mo. 1874

7 : 532

Lord, Ex’rs of v. Carbon Co.

N.J. 1884

15 : 695

Lorimier v. Lewis

Iowa 1843

12 : 437

Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. M. Co.

U.S. Utah 1900

21 : 113

Lyon v. Woodman

Utah 1870

7 : 493

Madden v. Connell

Canada Br. Col. 1899

20 : 158

Magnet Co. v. Panaca Co.

Nev. 1874

7 : 540

Maine Boys’ Co. v. Boston Co.

Cal. 1869

12 : 247

Malaby v. Rice

Colo. App. 1900

21 : 29

Mallett v. Uncle Sam Co.

Nev. 1865

1 : 17

Maloney v. King

Mont. 1901

21 : 278

Mammoth Vein Co. Appeal

Penna. 1867

7 : 460

Mandlebaum v. North Amer. Co.

Mich. 1857

5 : 506

Manuel v. Wulff

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 85

Marquart v. Bradford

Cal. 1872

5 : 528

Marshall Co. v. Kirtley

Colo. 1888

16 : 6

Martin & Davis v. Browner

Cal. 1858

1 : 613

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

McAndrews v. Tippett

N.J. 1876

14 : 616

McBrayer v. Hardin

No. Car. 1850

7 : 288

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

McCarron. v. O’Connell

Cal. 1857

14 : 429

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-69- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

McCauley v. McKeig Mont. 1889 16 : 1 McClintock v. Bryden

Cal. 1855

12 : 443

McCormick v. Rossi

Cal. 1886

15 : 433

McCormick v. Varnes

Utah c. 1878-80

9 : 505

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

McEvoy v. Hyman

(1)

C.C.D. Colo. 1885

15 : 300

McEvoy v. Hyman

(2)

C.C.D. Colo. 1885

15 : 397

McGarrahan v. New Idria Co.

Cal. 1874

11 : 641

McGarrahan v. New Idria Co.

U.S. Cal. 1877

11 : 665

McGarrity v. Byington

Cal. 1859

2 : 311

McGee v. Stone

Cal. 1858

2 : 238

McGinnis v. Egbert

Colo. 1884

15 : 329

McGoon v. Ankeny

Ill. 1850

1 : 9

McKeon v. Bisbee

Cal. 1858

2 : 309

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co.

U.S. Alaska 1902

21 : 730

McKnight v. Kreutz

Penna. 1866

6 : 305

McLaughlin v. Kelly

Cal. 1863

7 : 445

McLaughlin v. Powell

Cal. 1875

10 : 424

Merced Mining Co. v. Fremont

Cal. 1857

7 : 309

Merced Mining Co. v. Fremont

Cal. 1857

7 : 313

Mercer Co. v. McKee’s Adm’r

Penna. 1874

5 : 531

Metcalf v. Prescott

Mont. 1891

16 : 137

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Meyendorf v. Frohner

Mont. 1879

5 : 559

Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

Miller v. Butterfield

Cal. 1889

17 : 222

Miller v. Chester Slate Co.

Penna. 1889

16 : 288

Miller v. Taylor

Colo. 1881

9 : 547

Mills v. Fletcher

Cal. 1893

17 : 671

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-70- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Mitchell v. Dors U.K. 1801 7 : 250 Mitchell v. Hagood

Cal. 1856

1 : 506

Mont Blanc Co. v. Debour

Cal. 1882

15 : 286

Montana Co. v. Clark

C.C.D. Mont. 1890

16 : 81

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

20 : 507

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1903

22 : 555

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1897

19 : 186

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1899

20 : 1

Moore v. Ferrell

Georgia 1846

7 : 281

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Moore v. Smaw (Fremont v. Flower)

Cal. 1861

12 : 418

More v. Massini

Cal. 1867

7 : 455

Morenhaut v. Wilson

Cal. 1877

1 : 53

Morris v. Smith

U.K. 1783

6 : 22

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

Morton v. Solambo Co.

Cal. 1864

4 : 463

Morton v. State of Nebraska

U.S. Nebr. 1874

12 : 451

Mount Diablo Co. v. Callison

C.C.D. Nev. 1879

9 : 616

Moxon v. Wilkinson

Mont. 1876

12 : 602

Mt. Rosa M., M. & L. Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

Muldoon v. Brown

Utah 1899

20 : 269

Munson v. Tryon

Penna. 1867

7 : 469

Murphy v. Cobb

Colo. 1880

5 : 330

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Murray v. Polglase

Mont. 1899

20 : 296

Myers v. Spooner

Cal. 1880

9 : 519

National Co. v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1885

17 : 44

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-71- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Neilson v. Champagne Co. (Champaigne) 8th Cir. Colo. 1902 22 : 438 Neilson v. Champaigne Co. (Champagne)

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Newton v. Nock

U.K. 1880

7 : 611

Nicklin v. Williams

U.K. 1854

13 : 650

Niles v. Kennan

Colo. 1900

21 : 33

North American E. Co. Ltd. v. Adams

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 65

North Noonday Co. v. Orient Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1880

9 : 524

North Noonday Co. v. Orient Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1880

9 : 529

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

Noyes v. Mantle

U.S. Mont. 1888

15 : 611

O’Keiffe v. Cunningham

Cal. 1858

9 : 451

Old Telegraph Co. v. Central Co.

Utah 1876

7 : 555

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

Omaha & Grant Co. v. Tabor

Colo. 1889

16 : 184

Omar v. Soper

Colo. 1888

15 : 496

Oreamuno v. Uncle Sam Co.

Nev. 1865

1 : 32

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Ore. 1902

22 : 414

Orr v. Haskell

Mont. 1874

4 : 492

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Outram v. Morewood

U.K. 1803

5 : 484

Overman Co. v. American Co.

Nev. 1872

2 : 251

Overman Co. v. Corcoran

Nev. 1880

1 : 691

Pacific Coast Co. v. Spargo

C.C.D. Cal. 1883

16 : 75

Packer v. Heaton

Cal. 1858

4 : 447

Pardee v. Murray

Mont. 1882

15 : 515

Parley’s Park Co. v. Kerr

U.S. Utah 1889

17 : 201

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1900

21 : 98

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-72- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze Mont. 1901 21 : 232 Partridge v. Scott

U.K. 1838

13 : 640

Patterson v. Hitchcock

Colo. 1877

5 : 542

Peabody Gold Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

Peabody Gold Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

Pennsylvania Co. v. Grass Valley Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1902

22 : 306

Pennsylvania Co. v. Owens Co.

Cal. 1860

12 : 200

Pennsylvania M. Co. v. Bales

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 436

Perego v. Dodge

U.S. Utah 1896

18 : 364

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

Perley v. Langley

N.H. 1834

4 : 235

Pharis v. Muldoon

Cal. 1888

15 : 348

Phenix Co. v. Lawrence

Cal. 1880

12 : 261

Phillpotts v. Blasdel

Nev. 1872

4 : 341

Pollard v. Shively

Colo. 1880

2 : 229

Pool v. Lewis

Georgia 1870

5 : 523

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Prosser v. Parks

Cal. 1861

4 : 452

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Quarrington v. Arthur

U.K. 1842

15 : 255

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

Quirk v. Falk

Cal. 1874

2 : 19

Raffetto v. Fiori

Cal. 1875

14 : 469

Raisbeck v. Anthony

Wisc. 1888

17 : 148

Ralston v. Plowman

Idaho 1875

5 : 160

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

Real del Monte Co. v. Pond Co.

Cal. 1863

7 : 452

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Reed v. Spicer

Cal. 1864

4 : 330

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-73- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Regan v. Whittaker S. Dak. 1901 21 : 309 Renshaw v. Switzer

Mont. 1887

15 : 345

Republican M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1897

18 : 564

Rex v. Inhabi’ts of Sedgley

U.K. 1831

10 : 390

Reynolds v. Iron Silver Co.

U.S. Colo. 1886

15 : 591

Richardson v. McNulty

Cal. 1864

1 : 11

Richmond Co. v. Eureka Co.

U.S. Nev. 1880

9 : 634

Risch v. Wiseman

Oregon 1900

20 : 409

Rivers v. Burbank

Nev. 1878

7 : 583

Roach v. Gray

Cal. 1860

4 : 450

Roberts v. Rose

U.K. 1865

14 : 441

Roberts v. Wilson

Utah 1876

4 : 498

Robinson v. Black Diamond Coal Co.

Cal. 1875

14 : 93

Robinson v. Imperial Co.

Nev. 1869

10 : 370

Rockwell v. Graham

Colo. 1885

15 : 299

Rogers v. Cooney

Nev. 1872

14 : 85

Rosenthal v. Ives

Idaho 1887

15 : 324

Rough v. Simmons

Cal. 1884

15 : 298

Rowe v. Bacigalluppi

Cal. 1863

5 : 237

Rowe v. Bradley

Cal. 1859

14 : 431

Rowe v. Grenfel

U.K. 1826

13 : 234

Roxanna Gold M. & T. Co. v. Cone

C.C.D. Colo. 1899

20 : 323

Royston v. Miller

C.C.D. Nev. 1896

18 : 418

Russell v. Chumasero

Mont. 1882

15 : 508

Rynd v. Rynd Farm Co.

Penna. 1869

5 : 275

San Felipe Co. v. Belshaw

Cal. 1875

5 : 315

Sanders v. Noble

Mont. 1899

19 : 650

Schissler v. Chesshire

Nev. 1872

5 : 309

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-74- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Schultz v. Keeler Idaho 1889 17 : 198 Schuylkill & D. Co. v. Schmoele

Penna. 1868

7 : 480

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

Scranton v. Phillips

Penna. 1880

14 : 48

Sears v. Taylor

Colo. 1877

5 : 318

Seymour v. Wood

Cal. 1878

1 : 62

Shafer v. Constans

Mont. 1879

1 : 147

Shafto v. Johnson

U.K. 1863

15 : 262

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

Shaw v. Wallace

N.J. 1856

14 : 420

Sherman v. Clark

Nev. 1868

7 : 483

Shoenberger v. Baker

Penna. 1853

14 : 412

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

Sierra Nevada Co. v. Sears

Nev. 1875

7 : 549

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

Silver Mining Co. v. Fall

Nev. 1870

5 : 283

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

Slade v. Sullivan

Cal. 1860

7 : 419

Slavonian Co. v. Perasich

C.C.D. Nev. 1881

1 : 541

Smart v. Morton

U.K. 1855

13 : 655

Smith v. City of Rome

Georgia 1855

7 : 306

Smith v. Darby

U.K. 1872

13 : 695

Smith v. Doe

Cal. 1860

5 : 218

Smith v. Richardson

Utah 1877

1 : 139

Snodgrass v. Ward

Tenn. 1816

4 : 306

Sobey v. Thomas

Wisc. 1876

4 : 359

Southern Cr. Co. v. Europa Co.

Nev. 1880

9 : 513

Sparrow v. Strong

U.S. Nev. 1865

2 : 320

Spencer v. Kunkle

Penna. 1853

2 : 18

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-75- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Spencer v. Scurr U.K. 1862 10 : 388 Spencer v. Winselman

Cal. 1871

2 : 334

St. John v. Kidd

Cal. 1864

4 : 454

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana Co.

Mont. 1890

17 : 283

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1893

17 : 658

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1898

19 : 575

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

St. Louis Smelting Co. v. Kemp

U.S. Colo. 1881

11 : 673

Stapleton v. Pease

Mont. 1877

9 : 574

State ex rel. Heinze v. Dist. Court

Mont. 1902

22 : 195

State v. Real del Monte Co.

Nev. 1865

4 : 334

Steel v. Gold Lead Co.

Nev. 1883

15 : 292

Stevens v. Murphy (see Leadville Co. v. Fitzgerald, above) Stevens v. Williams

(1)

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

1 : 557

Stevens v. Williams

(2)

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

1 : 566

Steves v. Carson

C.C.D. Colo. 1890

16 : 12

Stewart v. Chadwick

Iowa 1859

13 : 236

Stewart v. Munford

Ill. 1878

5 : 555

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

Stoakes v. Monroe

Cal. 1868

2 : 246

Stockbridge Co. v. Cone Co.

Mass. 1869

6 : 317

Stone v. Geyser Co.

Cal. 1877

1 : 59

Strang v. Ryan

Cal. 1873

1 : 48

Strelley v. Pearson

U.K. 1880

7 : 618

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

Sullivan v. Hense

Colo. 1874

9 : 487

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-76- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Sunday Lake Co. v. Wakefield Wisc. 1888 16 : 97 Table Mountain Co. v. Stranahan

Cal. 1862

9 : 457

Table Mountain Co. v. Stranahan

Cal. 1863

9 : 465

Tabor v. Dexter (“T. v. Dexler”)

C.C.D. Colo. 1878

9 : 614

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

Taylor v. Middleton

Cal. 1885

15 : 284

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Territory v. Lee

Mont. 1874

6 : 248

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

Thomas v. Chisholm

Colo. 1889

16 : 122

Thomas v. Oakley

U.K. 1811

7 : 254

Thorn v. Sweeney

Nev. 1877

7 : 564

Tiley v. Moyers

Penna. 1855

15 : 259

Tiley v. Moyers

Penna. 1862

4 : 320

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

Troxell v. Lehigh Crane Co.

Penna. 1862

5 : 517

Tuolumne Consol. M. Co. v. Maier

Cal. 1901

21 : 678

Turner v. Reynolds

Penna. 1854

12 : 190

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 525

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C.C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

Union Co. v. Taylor

U.S. Nev. 1879

5 : 323

United RR Co. v. Stand’d O. Co.

N.J. 1880

7 : 625

United States v. Blackburn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 684

United States v. Gear

C.C.D. Ill. 1845

14 : 403

United States v. Homestake M. Co.

8th Cir. S.D. 1902

22 : 365

United States v. Marshall Co.

U.S. Colo. 1889

16 : 205

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-77- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

United States v. Parrott C.C.N.D. Cal. 1858 7 : 335 United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

Upton v. Larkin

Mont. 1888

15 : 404

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Van Valkenburg v. Huff

Nev. 1865

9 : 467

Van Zandt v. Argentine Co. (Vanzandt)

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 441

Vanatta v. Brewer

N.J. 1880

6 : 358

Vanzandt v. Argentine Co. (Van Zandt)

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

7 : 634

Von Schmidt v. Huntington

Cal. 1850

6 : 284

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

Waldron v. Marsh

Cal. 1855

7 : 305

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alas. 1903

22 : 688

Waring v. Crow

Cal. 1858

5 : 204

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

Wells v. Davis

Utah 1900

21 : 1

Wentworth v. Turner

U.K. 1795

7 : 249

West Point Co. v. Reymert

N.Y. 1871

7 : 528

West v. Lanier

Tenn. 1849

12 : 184

Westcott v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1871

6 : 336

Westmoreland Coal Appeal

Penna. 1877

10 : 394

White v. Lee

Cal. 1889

17 : 209

Whittingham v. Andrews

U.K. 1692

5 : 198

Wickersham v. Chicago Zinc Co.

Kansas 1877

5 : 536

Wild v. Holt

U.K. 1842

12 : 182

Wilkins v. Monson Consol. Slate Co.

Me. 1902

22 : 185

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-78- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol : Page

Williams v. Bagnall U.K. 1866 13 : 686 Williams v. Gibson

Alabama 1887

16 : 243

Williams v. Groucott

U.K. 1863

13 : 632

Wilms v. Jess

Ill. 1880

14 : 56

Wilson v. Waddell

U.K. 1876

14 : 25

Wiseman v. McNulty

Cal. 1864

6 : 326

Wolfley v. Lebanon Co.

Colo. 1878

13 : 282

Wolverton v. Nichols

U.S. Mont. 1886

15 : 309

Wright v. Killian

Cal. 1901

21 : 211

Yahoola River Co. v. Irby

Georgia 1869

14 : 460

Yards v. Wright

Ind. 1879

14 : 32

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

Zeckendorf v. Hutchinson

N. Mex. 1871

9 : 483

Zollars v. Evans

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

4 : 407

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-79- June 2000

ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF PRINCIPAL CASES

Volumes 17-22

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey

Colo. 1903

22 : 585

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

Argentine M. Co. v. Terrible M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1887

17 : 109

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

Bash v. Cascade M. Co.

Wash. 1902

22 : 299

Basin M. & C. Co. v. White

Mont. 1899

19 : 690

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Bennett v. Harkrader

U.S. Alaska 1895

18 : 224

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

Blackburn v. Portland Gold M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1900

20 : 358

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Boston & Mont. Co. v. Montana O. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

Brewster v. Shoemaker

Colo. 1900

21 : 155

Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson

Colo. App. 1901

21 : 499

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State-Idaho

Mining & Developing Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-80- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co. U.S. Colo. 1901 21 : 381 Campbell v. Ellet

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 669

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

Catron v. Old

Colo. 1897

18 : 569

Cedar Canyon M. Co. V. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

Consolidated W. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

Cosmopolitan M. Co. v. Foote

C.C.D. Nev. 1900

20 : 497

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

Cranes Gulch M. Co. v. Scherrer

Cal. 1901

21 : 549

Craw v. Wilson

Nev. 1895

18 : 244

Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold M. Co.

Idaho 1893

17 : 548

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

Doe v. Sanger

Cal. 1890

17 : 298

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

Dower v. Richards

U.S. Cal. 1894

17 : 704

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

Duncan v. Fulton

Colo. App. 1900

20 : 522

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consol. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-81- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Durant v. Corbin C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899 20 : 84 Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

Elder v. Horseshoe M. & M. Co.

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 510

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan

Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 104

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan

Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 132

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan

Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

Empire Milling Co. v. Tombstone Co.

C.C.D. Conn. 1900

20 : 443

Enterprise M. Co. v. Rico-Aspen Co.

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 661

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

Freezer v. Sweeney

Mont. 1889

17 : 179

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

Gilpin v. Sierra Nevada M. Co.

Idaho 1890

17 : 310

Girard v. Carson

Colo. 1896

18 : 346

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

Hamilton v. Huson

Mont. 1898

19 : 274

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

Haynes v. Briscoe

Colo. 1901

21 : 720

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-82- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Hext v. Gill U.K. Cornwall 1872 17 : 1 Hoffman v. Beecher

Mont. 1892

17 : 503

Honaker v. Martin

Mont. 1891

17 : 404

Hunt v. Eureka Gulch M. Co.

Colo. 1890

17 : 340

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

Johnson v. Munday

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 96

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

Kendall v. San Juan Silver M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 475

King v. Amy & Silversmith M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 76

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Larkin v. Upton

U.S. Mont. 1892

17 : 465

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

Last Chance M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

U.S. Idaho 1895

18 : 205

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Little Josephine M. Co. v. Fullerton

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 664

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. M. Co.

U.S. Utah 1900

21 : 113

Madden v. Connell

Canada Br. Col. 1899

20 : 158

Malaby v. Rice

Colo. App. 1900

21 : 29

Maloney v. King

Mont. 1901

21 : 278

Manuel v. Wulff

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 85

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-83- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co. U.S. Alaska 1902 21 : 730 Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

Miller v. Butterfield

Cal. 1889

17 : 222

Mills v. Fletcher

Cal. 1893

17 : 671

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

20 : 507

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1897

19 : 186

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1899

20 : 1

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1903

22 : 555

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

Mt. Rosa M., M. & Land Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

Muldoon v. Brown

Utah 1899

20 : 269

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Murray v. Polglase

Mont. 1899

20 : 296

National Co. v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1885

17 : 44

Neilson v. Champagne M. & M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 438

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Niles v. Kennan

Colo. 1900

21 : 33

North American E. Co. Ltd. v. Adams

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 65

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Oregon 1902

22 : 414

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Parley’s Park Silver M. Co. v. Kerr

U.S. Utah 1889

17 : 201

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-84- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze Mont. 1900 21 : 98 Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1901

21 : 232

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

Pennsylvania Co. v. Grass Valley Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1902

22 : 306

Pennsylvania M. Co. v. Bales

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 436

Perego v. Dodge

U.S. Utah 1896

18 : 364

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

Raisbeck v. Anthony

Wisc. 1888

17 : 148

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Regan v. Whittaker

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 309

Republican M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1897

18 : 564

Risch v. Wiseman

Oregon 1900

20 : 409

Roxanna Gold M. & T. Co. v. Cone

C.C.D. Colo. 1899

20 : 323

Royston v. Miller

C.C.D. Nev. 1896

18 : 418

Sanders v. Noble

Mont. 1899

19 : 650

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

Schultz v. Keeler

Idaho 1889

17 : 198

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana Co.

Mont. 1890

17 : 283

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1893

17 : 658

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-85- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co. U.S. Mont. 1898 19 : 575 St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

State ex rel. Heinze v. Dist. Court

Mont. 1902

22 : 195

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

Tuolumne Consol. M. Co. v. Maier

Cal. 1901

21 : 678

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 525

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C. C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

United States v. Blackburn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 684

United States v. Homestake M. Co.

8th Cir. S. Dak. 1902

22 : 365

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alaska 1903

22 : 688

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-86- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Wells v. Davis Utah 1900 21 : 1 White v. Lee

Cal. 1889

17 : 209

Wilkins v. Monson Consol. Slate Co.

Me. 1902

22 : 185

Wright v. Killian

Cal. 1901

21 : 211

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-87- June 2000

ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF CASES BY TOPICS AND BY CASE NAMES

Volumes 17-22

In the following tables, each case selected for indexing from the six supplemental volumes appears under the

topic heading used by Mr. Morrison for the case, and under each pertinent index-digest heading to which he

assigned the case in the volume in it was published. Each case therefore appears in this table at least once under

its topic heading indicated by the pointer [>], and those pointers therefore identify the principal cases under the

heading. All other cases listed under that topic heading are those which are merely digested under that heading

in Mr. Morrison’s index-digests.

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

ABANDONMENT

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

>

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

>

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

>

Niles v. Kennan

Colo. 1900

21 : 33

>

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

ADVERSE CLAIM >

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

>

Blackburn v. Portland Gold M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1900

20 : 358

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire

State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

>

Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold M. Co.

Idaho 1893

17 : 548

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

>

Girard v. Carson

Colo. 1896

18 : 346

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-88- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

>

Hoffman v. Beecher

Mont. 1892

17 : 503

>

Hunt v. Eureka Gulch M. Co.

Colo. 1890

17 : 340

>

Johnson v. Munday

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 96

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

>

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

>

Murray v. Polglase

Mont. 1899

20 : 296

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

>

Pennsylvania M. Co. v. Bales

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 436

>

Perego v. Dodge

U.S. Utah 1896

18 : 364

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

>

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

Adverse possession

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

AGENT >

Schultz v. Keeler

Idaho 1889

17 : 198

AGRICULTURAL LAND(S) >

United States v. Blackburn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 684

Alaska

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

ALIENS >

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

>

Manuel v. Wulff

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 85

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-89- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co. U.S. Alaska 1902 21 : 730

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

ANNUAL LABOR

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

>

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

>

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

>

Honaker v. Martin

Mont. 1891

17 : 404

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

>

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

>

Mills v. Fletcher

Cal. 1893

17 : 671

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

>

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

>

Royston v. Miller

C.C.D. Nev. 1896

18 : 418

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-90- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Wright v. Killian Cal. 1901 21 : 211

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

APEX >

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey

Colo. 1903

22 : 585

>

Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

>

Argentine M. Co. v. Terrible M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1887

17 : 109

>

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

Boston & Mont. Co. v. Montana O. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

>

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire

State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

>

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

>

Catron v. Old

Colo. 1897

18 : 569

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Consolidated W. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

>

Cosmopolitan M. Co. v. Foote

C.C.D. Nev. 1900

20 : 497

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

>

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

>

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

>

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

>

Empire Milling Co. v. Tombstone Co.

C.C.D. Conn. 1900

20 : 443

>

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining &

Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 104

>

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 132

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

>

Gilpin v. Sierra Nevada M. Co.

Idaho 1890

17 : 310

>

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

>

King v. Amy & Silversmith M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 76

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-91- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Larkin v. Upton U.S. Mont. 1892 17 : 465

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

>

Last Chance M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

U.S. Idaho 1895

18 : 205

Maloney v. King

Mont. 1901

21 : 278

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

>

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1903

22 : 555

>

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1901

21 : 232

>

Republican M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1897

18 : 564

>

Roxanna Gold M. & T. Co. v. Cone

C.C.D. Colo. 1899

20 : 323

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

Appurtenances >

North American E. Co. Ltd. v. Adams

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 65

Assay >

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

Barriers >

National Co. v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1885

17 : 44

BOUNDARIES

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

>

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

CONVEYANCE >

Boston & Mont. Co. v. Montana O. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

Hext v. Gill

U.K. Cornwall 1872

17 : 1

>

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

>

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

20 : 507

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-92- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Stinchfield v. Gillis Cal. 1895 18 : 195 >

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

CROSS LODE

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

>

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

DISCOVERY

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

>

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

Cedar Canyon M. Co. V. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

>

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

>

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

>

Tuolumne Consol. M. Co. v. Maier

Cal. 1901

21 : 678

>

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

DISCOVERY SHAFT >

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Brewster v. Shoemaker

Colo. 1900

21 : 155

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-93- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Girard v. Carson Colo. 1896 18 : 346 >

Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. M. Co.

U.S. Utah 1900

21 : 113

Madden v. Connell

Canada Br. Col. 1899

20 : 158

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

DISTRICT RULES

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

>

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

>

Parley’s Park Silver M. Co. v. Kerr

U.S. Utah 1889

17 : 201

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

DOWER >

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

EJECTMENT >

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

>

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

>

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

END LINES

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Consolidated W. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

Doe v. Sanger

Cal. 1890

17 : 298

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-94- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co. 9th Cir. Mont. 1900 21 : 57 >

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

EQUITY >

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

ESTOPPEL

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

>

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

>

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

>

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

FAULT (GEOLOGICAL)

Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

>

Raisbeck v. Anthony

Wisc. 1888

17 : 148

Forest Reserves (exchanges)

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

FORFEITURE >

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

>

Elder v. Horseshoe M. & M. Co.

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 510

>

Haynes v. Briscoe

Colo. 1901

21 : 720

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

>

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

Fraud

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

INDIAN RESERVATION >

Kendall v. San Juan Silver M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 475

INJUNCTION

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-95- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Maloney v. King Mont. 1901 21 : 278 >

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1899

20 : 1

>

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1900

21 : 98

>

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1893

17 : 658

INJUNCTION BOND >

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 525

INSPECTION

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

>

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana Co.

Mont. 1890

17 : 283

>

State ex rel. Heinze v. Dist. Court

Mont. 1902

22 : 195

KNOWN LODE >

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

>

Cranes Gulch M. Co. v. Scherrer

Cal. 1901

21 : 549

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

LAND OFFICE >

Basin M. & C. Co. v. White

Mont. 1899

19 : 690

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

>

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C. C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

LOCATION

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

>

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

>

Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-96- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Cleary v. Skiffich Colo. 1901 21 : 284 >

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

>

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

>

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

>

Doe v. Sanger

Cal. 1890

17 : 298

>

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

>

Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

>

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

>

Madden v. Connell

Canada Br. Col. 1899

20 : 158

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

>

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Oregon 1902

22 : 414

>

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Regan v. Whittaker

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 309

Risch v. Wiseman

Oregon 1900

20 : 409

>

Sanders v. Noble

Mont. 1899

19 : 650

>

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

>

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-97- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido Cal. 1902 22 : 360

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

>

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alaska 1903

22 : 688

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

>

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

LOCATION CERTIFICATE >

Bennett v. Harkrader

U.S. Alaska 1895

18 : 224

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

>

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

>

Muldoon v. Brown

Utah 1899

20 : 269

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Oregon 1902

22 : 414

>

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

>

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C. C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alaska 1903

22 : 688

>

Wells v. Davis

Utah 1900

21 : 1

Location notice

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-98- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman Utah 1901 21 : 296

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

LODE

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson

Colo. App. 1901

21 : 499

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

>

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

>

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

>

Consolidated W. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

>

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

>

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

>

Little Josephine M. Co. v. Fullerton

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 664

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Mt. Rosa M., M. & Land Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

>

Pennsylvania Co. v. Grass Valley Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1902

22 : 306

>

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

>

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

>

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

LOST PAPER (deed from locator) >

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-99- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

MEASURE OF DAMAGES >

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

>

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consol. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

>

United States v. Homestake M. Co.

8th Cir. S. Dak. 1902

22 : 365

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

>

Wilkins v. Monson Consol. Slate Co.

Me. 1902

22 : 185

MEXICAN GRANT >

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

MILL SITE >

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

>

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

MINERAL LANDS >

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

Durant v. Corbin

C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899

20 : 84

>

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

>

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

MINERAL(S) >

Hext v. Gill

U.K. Cornwall 1872

17 : 1

Mining Claim

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

PARTNERSHIP >

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

PATENT >

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

>

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-100- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co. C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897 18 : 592

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

>

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1897

19 : 186

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1898

19 : 575

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

>

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

PLACERS

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

>

Durant v. Corbin

C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899

20 : 84

>

Freezer v. Sweeney

Mont. 1889

17 : 179

>

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

>

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

>

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co.

U.S. Alaska 1902

21 : 730

>

Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

>

Mt. Rosa M., M. & Land Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alaska 1903

22 : 688

>

White v. Lee

Cal. 1889

17 : 209

POSSESSION

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-101- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co. Colo. 1891 17 : 396

Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

>

Hamilton v. Huson

Mont. 1898

19 : 274

>

Risch v. Wiseman

Oregon 1900

20 : 409

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

PROSPECT

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

>

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

PROSPECTING CONTRACT >

Craw v. Wilson

Nev. 1895

18 : 244

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

>

Miller v. Butterfield

Cal. 1889

17 : 222

PROTEST >

Neilson v. Champagne M. & M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 438

PUBLIC DOMAIN

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

>

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1898

19 : 575

QUIET TITLE

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

>

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

>

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

>

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

>

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

Mt. Rosa M., M. & Land Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-102- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Shattuck v. Costello Ariz. 1902 22 : 136 RECEIVER’S RECEIPT >

Bash v. Cascade M. Co.

Wash. 1902

22 : 299

Record

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

>

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Relation (back)

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

RELOCATION

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

>

Duncan v. Fulton

Colo. App. 1900

20 : 522

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

>

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

>

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

>

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

>

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

>

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

>

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

>

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

>

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Wright v. Killian

Cal. 1901

21 : 211

>

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Side Lines >

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-103- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Side Veins

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

STATUTE OF FRAUDS >

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

Statute of Limitations

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

>

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

>

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

STOCK >

Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

TENANT(S) IN COMMON >

Cedar Canyon M. Co. V. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

>

Malaby v. Rice

Colo. App. 1900

21 : 29

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

>

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

TIMBER >

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

TITLE BOND >

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

TOWNSITE >

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

>

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

>

Dower v. Richards

U.S. Cal. 1894

17 : 704

>

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

>

Regan v. Whittaker

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 309

TRESPASS

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consol. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-104- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

United States v. Homestake M. Co. 8th Cir. S. Dak. 1902 22 : 365

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

>

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

TRUST(S) >

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

>

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

TUNNEL(S) >

Brewster v. Shoemaker

Colo. 1900

21 : 155

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

>

Campbell v. Ellet

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 669

>

Enterprise M. Co. v. Rico-Aspen Co.

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 661

>

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

>

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

>

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C. C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Workings >

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson

Colo. App. 1901

21 : 499

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-105- June 2000

ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF TOPIC HEADINGS,

GROUPING CASES CHRONOLOGICALLY

Volumes 1-22

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

ABANDONMENT >

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

>

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

>

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

>

Niles v. Kennan

Colo. 1900

21 : 33

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

ADVERSE CLAIM

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

>

Hunt v. Eureka Gulch M. Co.

Colo. 1890

17 : 340

>

Hoffman v. Beecher

Mont. 1892

17 : 503

>

Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold M. Co.

Idaho 1893

17 : 548

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

>

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

>

Girard v. Carson

Colo. 1896

18 : 346

>

Perego v. Dodge

U.S. Utah 1896

18 : 364

>

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-106- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke Ariz. 1899 19 : 625 >

Murray v. Polglase

Mont. 1899

20 : 296

>

Blackburn v. Portland Gold M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1900

20 : 358

>

Johnson v. Munday

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 96

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire

State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

>

Pennsylvania M. Co. v. Bales

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 436

>

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Adverse possession

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

AGENT >

Schultz v. Keeler

Idaho 1889

17 : 198

AGRICULTURAL LAND(S) >

United States v. Blackburn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 684

Alaska

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

ALIENS >

Manuel v. Wulff

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 85

>

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co.

U.S. Alaska 1902

21 : 730

ANNUAL LABOR

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-107- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co. Colo. 1891 17 : 396 >

Honaker v. Martin

Mont. 1891

17 : 404

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

>

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

>

Mills v. Fletcher

Cal. 1893

17 : 671

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

>

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

>

Royston v. Miller

C.C.D. Nev. 1896

18 : 418

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

>

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

>

Wright v. Killian

Cal. 1901

21 : 211

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

>

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

APEX

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-108- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Duggan v. Davey Dakota 1886 17 : 59 >

Argentine M. Co. v. Terrible M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1887

17 : 109

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

>

Gilpin v. Sierra Nevada M. Co.

Idaho 1890

17 : 310

>

Larkin v. Upton

U.S. Mont. 1892

17 : 465

>

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

>

King v. Amy & Silversmith M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 76

Consolidated W. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

>

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

>

Last Chance M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

U.S. Idaho 1895

18 : 205

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

>

Republican M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1897

18 : 564

>

Catron v. Old

Colo. 1897

18 : 569

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

>

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

>

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

Boston & Mont. Co. v. Montana O. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

>

Roxanna Gold M. & T. Co. v. Cone

C.C.D. Colo. 1899

20 : 323

>

Empire Milling Co. v. Tombstone Co.

C.C.D. Conn. 1900

20 : 443

>

Cosmopolitan M. Co. v. Foote

C.C.D. Nev. 1900

20 : 497

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

>

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

>

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1901

21 : 232

Maloney v. King

Mont. 1901

21 : 278

>

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire

State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-109- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.,

9th Cir. Idaho 1902 22 : 104

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

>

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 132

>

Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

>

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1903

22 : 555

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

>

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey

Colo. 1903

22 : 585

Appurtenances >

North American E. Co. Ltd. v. Adams

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 65

Assay >

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

Barriers >

National Co. v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1885

17 : 44

BOUNDARIES

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

>

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

CONVEYANCE

Hext v. Gill

U.K. Cornwall 1872

17 : 1

>

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

>

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

>

Boston & Mont. Co. v. Montana O. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

>

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

20 : 507

>

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

CROSS LODE

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-110- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

>

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

DISCOVERY >

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

>

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

>

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

>

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

>

Tuolumne Consol. M. Co. v. Maier

Cal. 1901

21 : 678

Cedar Canyon M. Co. V. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

DISCOVERY SHAFT

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Girard v. Carson

Colo. 1896

18 : 346

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

Madden v. Connell

Canada Br. Col. 1899

20 : 158

>

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

>

Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. M. Co.

U.S. Utah 1900

21 : 113

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-111- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Brewster v. Shoemaker Colo. 1900 21 : 155 DISTRICT RULES >

Parley’s Park Silver M. Co. v. Kerr

U.S. Utah 1889

17 : 201

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

>

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

DOWER >

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

EJECTMENT

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

>

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

>

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

>

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

END LINES

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Doe v. Sanger

Cal. 1890

17 : 298

Consolidated W. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

>

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

EQUITY

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-112- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co. Colo. 1891 17 : 396 ESTOPPEL

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

>

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

>

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

>

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

FAULT (GEOLOGICAL) >

Raisbeck v. Anthony

Wisc. 1888

17 : 148

Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

Forest Reserves (exchanges)

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

FORFEITURE

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

>

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

>

Elder v. Horseshoe M. & M. Co.

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 510

>

Haynes v. Briscoe

Colo. 1901

21 : 720

>

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Fraud

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

INDIAN RESERVATION >

Kendall v. San Juan Silver M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 475

INJUNCTION >

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1893

17 : 658

>

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1899

20 : 1

>

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1900

21 : 98

>

Maloney v. King

Mont. 1901

21 : 278

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-113- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

INJUNCTION BOND >

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 525

INSPECTION

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

>

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana Co.

Mont. 1890

17 : 283

>

State ex rel. Heinze v. Dist. Court

Mont. 1902

22 : 195

KNOWN LODE

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

>

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

>

Cranes Gulch M. Co. v. Scherrer

Cal. 1901

21 : 549

LAND OFFICE

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

>

Basin M. & C. Co. v. White

Mont. 1899

19 : 690

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C. C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

>

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

LOCATION

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

>

Doe v. Sanger

Cal. 1890

17 : 298

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-114- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Doe v. Waterloo M. Co. 9th Cir. Cal. 1895 18 : 265 >

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

>

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

>

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

>

Sanders v. Noble

Mont. 1899

19 : 650

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

>

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

>

Madden v. Connell

Canada Br. Col. 1899

20 : 158

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Risch v. Wiseman

Oregon 1900

20 : 409

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

>

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

>

Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

>

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

Regan v. Whittaker

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 309

>

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

>

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

>

Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

>

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

>

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Oregon 1902

22 : 414

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-115- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Lavagnino v. Uhlig Utah 1903 22 : 610 >

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alaska 1903

22 : 688

LOCATION CERTIFICATE

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

>

Bennett v. Harkrader

U.S. Alaska 1895

18 : 224

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

>

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

>

Muldoon v. Brown

Utah 1899

20 : 269

>

Wells v. Davis

Utah 1900

21 : 1

>

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

>

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Oregon 1902

22 : 414

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C. C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alaska 1903

22 : 688

Location notice

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1895

18 : 265

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-116- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co. Utah 1900 21 : 125

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

LODE

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

>

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

>

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

>

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

>

Little Josephine M. Co. v. Fullerton

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 664

>

Consolidated W. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

>

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

>

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

>

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

>

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

Mt. Rosa M., M. & Land Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson

Colo. App. 1901

21 : 499

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

>

Pennsylvania Co. v. Grass Valley Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1902

22 : 306

LOST PAPER (deed from locator) >

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

MEASURE OF DAMAGES >

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

>

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consol. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-117- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Wilkins v. Monson Consol. Slate Co. Me. 1902 22 : 185 >

United States v. Homestake M. Co.

8th Cir. S. Dak. 1902

22 : 365

MEXICAN GRANT >

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

MILL SITE >

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

>

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

MINERAL LANDS >

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

Durant v. Corbin

C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899

20 : 84

>

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

>

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

MINERAL(S) >

Hext v. Gill

U.K. Cornwall 1872

17 : 1

Mining Claim

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

PARTNERSHIP >

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

PATENT

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

>

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

>

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

>

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1897

19 : 186

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

>

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-118- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co. U.S. Mont. 1898 19 : 575

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

>

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

PLACERS >

Freezer v. Sweeney

Mont. 1889

17 : 179

>

White v. Lee

Cal. 1889

17 : 209

>

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

>

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

>

Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

>

Mt. Rosa M., M. & Land Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

>

Durant v. Corbin

C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899

20 : 84

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

>

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co.

U.S. Alaska 1902

21 : 730

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alaska 1903

22 : 688

POSSESSION

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

>

Hamilton v. Huson

Mont. 1898

19 : 274

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-119- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

> Risch v. Wiseman Oregon 1900 20 : 409

Talmadge v. St. John

Cal. 1900

21 : 13

Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

PROSPECT

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

>

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

PROSPECTING CONTRACT >

Miller v. Butterfield

Cal. 1889

17 : 222

>

Craw v. Wilson

Nev. 1895

18 : 244

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

PROTEST >

Neilson v. Champagne M. & M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 438

PUBLIC DOMAIN

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

>

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1898

19 : 575

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

QUIET TITLE

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

>

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

Mt. Rosa M., M. & Land Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

>

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

>

Montana O. Co. v. Boston & Mont. Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

>

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill &

Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

RECEIVER’S RECEIPT >

Bash v. Cascade M. Co.

Wash. 1902

22 : 299

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-120- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Record

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

>

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Relation (back)

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

RELOCATION >

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Cheesman v. Shreeve

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

>

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

>

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

>

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

>

Duncan v. Fulton

Colo. App. 1900

20 : 522

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Wright v. Killian

Cal. 1901

21 : 211

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

>

Neilson v. Champaigne M. & M. Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

>

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

>

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

>

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

>

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Side Lines >

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

Side Veins

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-121- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

STATUTE OF FRAUDS >

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

Statute of Limitations >

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

>

Peabody Gold M. Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

STOCK >

Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

TENANT(S) IN COMMON >

Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

>

Malaby v. Rice

Colo. App. 1900

21 : 29

>

Cedar Canyon M. Co. V. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

TIMBER >

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

TITLE BOND >

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

TOWNSITE >

Dower v. Richards

U.S. Cal. 1894

17 : 704

>

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

>

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

>

Regan v. Whittaker

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 309

>

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

TRESPASS >

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consol. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

United States v. Homestake M. Co.

8th Cir. S. Dak. 1902

22 : 365

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-122- June 2000

Subject

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

TRUST(S) >

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

>

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

TUNNEL(S)

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

>

Enterprise M. Co. v. Rico-Aspen Co.

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 661

>

Campbell v. Ellet

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 669

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

>

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

>

Brewster v. Shoemaker

Colo. 1900

21 : 155

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

>

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

>

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C. C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

Workings >

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson

Colo. App. 1901

21 : 499

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-123- June 2000

V. JURISDICTIONAL-CHRONOLOGICAL / ALPHABETICAL

TABLE OF PRINCIPAL CASES

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Federal Court Cases Sparrow v. Strong

U.S. Nev. 1865

2 : 320

Morton v. State of Nebraska

U.S. Nebr. 1874

12 : 451

McGarrahan v. New Idria Co.

U.S. Cal. 1877

11 : 665

Campbell v. Rankin

U.S. Mont. 1878

12 : 257

Flagstaff Co. v. Tarbet

U.S. Utah 1878

9 : 607

Union Co. v. Taylor

U.S. Nev. 1879

5 : 323

Richmond Co. v. Eureka Co.

U.S. Nev. 1880

9 : 634

Belk v. Meagher

U.S. Mont. 1881

1 : 510

St. Louis Smelting Co. v. Kemp

U.S. Colo. 1881

11 : 673

Eilers v. Boatman

U.S. Utah 1884

15 : 471

Erhardt v. Boaro

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 447

Erhardt v. Boaro

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 472

Gwillim v. Donnellan

U.S. Colo. 1885

15 : 482

Iron Silver Co. v. Elgin Co.

U.S. Colo. 1886

15 : 641

Reynolds v. Iron Silver Co.

U.S. Colo. 1886

15 : 591

Wolverton v. Nichols

U.S. Mont. 1886

15 : 309

Argentine Co. v. Terrible Co.

U.S. Colo. 1887

17 : 109

Glacier Mountain Co. v. Willis

U.S. Colo. 1888

17 : 127

Noyes v. Mantle

U.S. Mont. 1888

15 : 611

United States v. Marshall Co.

U.S. Colo. 1889

16 : 205

Parley’s Park Co. v. Kerr

U.S. Utah 1889

17 : 201

Hammer v. Garfield Co.

U.S. Mont. 1889

16 : 125

Dahl v. Raunheim

U.S. Mont. 1889

16 : 214

Iron Silver Co. v. Campbell

U.S. Colo. 1890

16 : 218

Benson M. Co. v. Alta M. Co.

U.S. Ariz. 1892

17 : 488

Iron Silver Co. v. Mike & Starr Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 436

Kendall v. San Juan Silver M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1892

17 : 475

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-124- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Larkin v. Upton U.S. Mont. 1892 17 : 465 Turner v. Sawyer

U.S. Colo. 1893

17 : 683

Dower v. Richards

U.S. Cal. 1894

17 : 704

King v. Amy & Silversmith M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 76

Manuel v. Wulff

U.S. Mont. 1894

18 : 85

Bennett v. Harkrader

U.S. Alaska 1895

18 : 224

Last Chance M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

U.S. Idaho 1895

18 : 205

Black v. Elkhorn M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1896

18 : 375

Perego v. Dodge

U.S. Utah 1896

18 : 364

Campbell v. Ellet

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 669

Enterprise M. Co. v. Rico-Aspen Co.

U.S. Colo. 1897

18 : 661

Del Monte M. Co. v. Last Chance Co.

U.S. Colo. 1898

19 : 370

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

U.S. Mont. 1898

19 : 575

Walrath v. Champion M. Co.

U.S. Cal. 1898

19 : 410

Blackburn v. Portland Gold M. Co.

U.S. Colo. 1900

20 : 358

Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. M. Co.

U.S. Utah 1900

21 : 113

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

U.S. Colo. 1901

21 : 381

McKinley Creek Co. v. Alaska Co.

U.S. Alaska 1902

21 : 730

Little Josephine Co. v. Fullerton

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 664

Oscamp v. Crystal River M. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1893

17 : 651

Gillis v. Downey

8th Cir. Wyo. 1898

19 : 253

Durant M. Co. v. Percy Consol. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1899

20 : 27

Johnson v. Munday

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 96

North American E. Co. Ltd. v. Adams

8th Cir. Colo. 1900

21 : 65

Thallmann v. Thomas

8th Cir. Colo. 1901

21 : 573

Larned v. Jenkins

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 94

Neilson v. Champagne Co. (Champaigne)

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 438

Uinta Tun. Co. v. Creede & C.C. Co.

8th Cir. Colo. 1902

22 : 445

United States v. Homestake M. Co.

8th Cir. S.D. 1902

22 : 365

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-125- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Doe v. Waterloo M. Co. 9th Cir. Cal. 1895 18 : 265 Migeon v. Montana Cent. Ry. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1896

18 : 446

Carson City Co. v. North Star Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 118

Republican M. Co. v. Tyler M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1897

18 : 564

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

9th Cir. Cal. 1897

19 : 1

Shoshone M. Co. v. Rutter

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 356

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1898

19 : 525

Valcalda v. Silver Peak Mines

9th Cir. Nev. 1898

19 : 233

Northmore v. Simmons

9th Cir. Cal. 1899

20 : 128

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

20 : 507

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1900

21 : 57

Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State-Idaho Mining &

Developing Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1901

21 : 317

Cosmos Expl’n Co. v. Gray Eagle Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 633

Peabody Gold Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

9th Cir. Cal. 1901

21 : 591

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining &

Concentrating Co

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 104

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining &

Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 132

Oregon King M. Co. v. Brown

9th Cir. Ore. 1902

22 : 414

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

9th Cir. Mont. 1902

22 : 127

United States v. Van Winkle

9th Cir. Idaho 1902

22 : 56

Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining &

Concentrating Co.

9th Cir. Idaho 1903

22 : 560

Walton v. Wild Goose M. & T. Co.

9th Cir. Alas. 1903

22 : 688

Harkrader v. Carroll

C.C.D. Alaska 1896

18 : 474

Meydenbauer v. Stevens

C.C.D. Alaska 1897

18 : 578

Fremont v. Merced Mining Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1858

7 : 332

North Noonday Co. v. Orient Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1880

9 : 524

North Noonday Co. v. Orient Co.

C.C.D. Cal. 1880

9 : 529

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-126- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Jupiter Co. v. Bodie C. Co. C.C.D. Cal. 1881 4 : 411 Pacific Coast Co. v. Spargo

C.C.D. Cal. 1883

16 : 75

United States v. Parrott

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1858

7 : 335

Consolidated Wyo. Co. v. Champion Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 113

Peabody Gold Co. v. Gold Hill Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900

21 : 151

Pennsylvania Co. v. Grass Valley Co.

C.C.N.D. Cal. 1902

22 : 306

Waterloo M. Co. v. Doe

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1893

17 : 586

Gird v. California Oil Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1894

18 : 45

Nevada Sierra O. Co. v. Home O. Co.

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1899

20 : 283

Olive Land & Dev. Co. v. Olmstead

C.C.S.D. Cal. 1900

20 : 700

Tabor v. Dexter (“T. v. Dexler”)

C.C.D. Colo. 1878

9 : 614

Leadville Co. v. Fitzgerald

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

4 : 380

Stevens v. Williams

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

1 : 557

Stevens v. Williams

C.C.D. Colo. 1879

1 : 566

Faxon v. Barnard

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

9 : 515

Freeland v. Hoffman

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

13 : 289

Iron Silver Co. v. Murphy

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

1 : 548

Vanzandt v. Argentine Co. (Van Zandt)

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

7 : 634

Zollars v. Evans

C.C.D. Colo. 1880

4 : 407

Crossman v. Pendery

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 431

Erhardt v. Boaro

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 432

Erhardt v. Boaro

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 434

Frank Co. v. Larimer Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

1 : 150

Harris v. Equator Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

12 : 178

Iron Silver Co. v. Cheeseman

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

9 : 552

Van Zandt v. Argentine Co. (Vanzandt)

C.C.D. Colo. 1881

4 : 441

McEvoy v. Hyman

C.C.D. Colo. 1885

15 : 300

McEvoy v. Hyman

C.C.D. Colo. 1885

15 : 397

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-127- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Hyman v. Wheeler C.C.D. Colo. 1886 15 : 519 Cheesman v. Shreve (Shreeve)

C.C.D. Colo. 1888

16 : 79

Cheesman v. Shreeve (Shreve)

C.C.D. Colo. 1889

17 : 260

Cheesman v. Hart

C.C.D. Colo. 1890

16 : 263

Steves v. Carson

C.C.D. Colo. 1890

16 : 12

Del Monte M. Co. v. New York Co.

C.C.D. Colo. 1895

18 : 188

Roxanna Gold M. & T. Co. v. Cone

C.C.D. Colo. 1899

20 : 323

Neilson v. Champaigne Co. (Champagne)

C.C.D. Colo. 1901

21 : 664

Empire Milling Co. v. Tombstone Co.

C.C.D. Conn. 1900

20 : 443

Tyler M. Co. v. Last Chance M. Co.

C.C.D. Idaho 1895

18 : 303

United States v. Gear

C.C.D. Ill. 1845

14 : 403

Montana Co. v. Clark

C.C.D. Mont. 1890

16 : 81

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana M. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1893

17 : 658

Carter v. Thompson

C.C.D. Mont. 1894

18 : 134

Boston & Mont. Co. v. Montana O. Co.

C.C.D. Mont. 1898

19 : 480

Cole Co. v. Virginia Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1871

7 : 503

Cole Co. v. Virginia Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1871

7 : 516

Eureka Co. v. Richmond Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1877

9 : 578

Mount Diablo Co. v. Callison

C.C.D. Nev. 1879

9 : 616

Slavonian Co. v. Perasich

C.C.D. Nev. 1881

1 : 541

Hamilton v. Southern Nev. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1887

15 : 314

Aurora Hill Co. v. 85 Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1888

15 : 581

Book v. Justice M. Co.

C.C.D. Nev. 1893

17 : 617

Royston v. Miller

C.C.D. Nev. 1896

18 : 418

Bonner v. Meikle

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 83

Justice M. Co. v. Barclay

C.C.D. Nev. 1897

19 : 68

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-128- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Cosmopolitan M. Co. v. Foote C.C.D. Nev. 1900 20 : 497 Brown v. Oregon King M. Co.

C.C.D. Oregon 1901

21 : 485

Golden Reward M. Co. v. Buxton Co.

C.C.D. S. Dak. 1897

18 : 592

Perigo v. Erwin

C.C.D. Utah 1898

19 : 269

Durant v. Corbin

C.C.E.D. Wash. 1899

20 : 84

State and Territorial Court Cases Williams v. Gibson

Alabama 1887

16 : 243

Jeffords v. Hine

Ariz. 1886

15 : 575

Alexander v. Sherman

Ariz. 1887

15 : 638

Watervale M. Co. v. Leach

Ariz. 1893

17 : 568

Schultz v. Allyn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 649

United States v. Blackburn

Ariz. 1897

18 : 684

Kinney v. Fleming

Ariz. 1899

20 : 13

Providence Gold M. Co. v. Burke

Ariz. 1899

19 : 625

Shattuck v. Costello

Ariz. 1902

22 : 136

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump

Ark. 1902

22 : 276

Von Schmidt v. Huntington

Cal. 1850

6 : 284

Fitzgerald v. Urton

Cal. 1855

12 : 198

McClintock v. Bryden

Cal. 1855

12 : 443

Waldron v. Marsh

Cal. 1855

7 : 305

Davis v. Butler

Cal. 1856

1 : 7

Mitchell v. Hagood

Cal. 1856

1 : 506

Coker v. Simpson

Cal. 1857

7 : 330

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-129- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

McCarron. v. O’Connell Cal. 1857 14 : 429 Merced Mining Co. v. Fremont

Cal. 1857

7 : 309

Merced Mining Co. v. Fremont

Cal. 1857

7 : 313

Johnson v. Parks

Cal. 1858

4 : 316

Jones v. Jackson

Cal. 1858

14 : 72

Martin & Davis v. Browner

Cal. 1858

1 : 613

McGee v. Stone

Cal. 1858

2 : 238

McKeon v. Bisbee

Cal. 1858

2 : 309

O’Keiffe v. Cunningham

Cal. 1858

9 : 451

Packer v. Heaton

Cal. 1858

4 : 447

Waring v. Crow

Cal. 1858

5 : 204

Boggs v. Merced Co.

Cal. 1859

10 : 334

Burdge v. Smith

Cal. 1859

12 : 448

Burke v. Table Mountain Co.

Cal. 1859

5 : 209

Burnett v. Whitesides

Cal. 1859

7 : 407

Busenius v. Coffee

Cal. 1859

5 : 214

Dutch Flat Co. v. Mooney

Cal. 1859

6 : 303

Henshaw v. Clark

Cal. 1859

14 : 434

McGarrity v. Byington

Cal. 1859

2 : 311

Rowe v. Bradley

Cal. 1859

14 : 431

Attwood v. Fricot

Cal. 1860

2 : 305

Brown v. ‘49 and ‘56 Quartz Co.

Cal. 1860

9 : 600

Coryell v. Cain

Cal. 1860

5 : 226

Eagan v. Delaney

Cal. 1860

5 : 223

Eldridge v. Wright

Cal. 1860

7 : 418

English v. Johnson

Cal. 1860

12 : 202

Gillan v. Hutchinson

Cal. 1860

2 : 317

Pennsylvania Co. v. Owens Co.

Cal. 1860

12 : 200

Roach v. Gray

Cal. 1860

4 : 450

Slade v. Sullivan

Cal. 1860

7 : 419

Smith v. Doe

Cal. 1860

5 : 218

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-130- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Ah He v. Crippen Cal. 1861 10 : 367 Ah Pong, Ex parte

Cal. 1861

1 : 507

Bell v. Schultz

Cal. 1861

14 : 77

Brennan v. Gaston

Cal. 1861

7 : 424

Brennan v. Gaston

Cal. 1861

7 : 426

Daubenspeck v. Grear

Cal. 1861

7 : 429

Ex parte Ah Pong

Cal. 1861

1 : 507

Fremont v. Seals

Cal. 1861

11 : 632

Gore v. McBrayer

Cal. 1861

1 : 645

Green v. Prettyman

Cal. 1861

5 : 515

Lentz v. Victor

Cal. 1861

12 : 211

Moore v. Smaw (Fremont v. Flower)

Cal. 1861

12 : 418

Prosser v. Parks

Cal. 1861

4 : 452

Dunning v. Rankin

Cal. 1862

9 : 455

Table Mountain Co. v. Stranahan

Cal. 1862

9 : 457

Bell v. Brown

Cal. 1863

5 : 240

Colman v. Clements

Cal. 1863

5 : 247

Ensminger v. McIntire

Cal. 1863

14 : 440

Hughes v. Devlin

Cal. 1863

12 : 241

McLaughlin v. Kelly

Cal. 1863

7 : 445

Real del Monte Co. v. Pond Co.

Cal. 1863

7 : 452

Rowe v. Bacigalluppi

Cal. 1863

5 : 237

Table Mountain Co. v. Stranahan

Cal. 1863

9 : 465

Ah Yew v. Choate

Cal. 1864

1 : 492

Depuy v. Williams

Cal. 1864

5 : 251

Morton v. Solambo Co.

Cal. 1864

4 : 463

Reed v. Spicer

Cal. 1864

4 : 330

Richardson v. McNulty

Cal. 1864

1 : 11

St. John v. Kidd

Cal. 1864

4 : 454

Wiseman v. McNulty

Cal. 1864

6 : 326

Hawxhurst v. Lander

Cal. 1865

12 : 214

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-131- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Dougherty v. Cleary Cal. 1866 1 : 35 Hess v. Winder

Cal. 1866

12 : 217

Gibson v. Puchta

Cal. 1867

12 : 227

Hebrard v. Jefferson Co.

Cal. 1867

5 : 270

Johnson v. Lamping

Cal. 1867

14 : 450

Lavaroni v. Miller

Cal. 1867

12 : 232

More v. Massini

Cal. 1867

7 : 455

Bell v. Bed Rock Co.

Cal. 1868

1 : 45

Felger v. Coward

Cal. 1868

5 : 273

Stoakes v. Monroe

Cal. 1868

2 : 246

Bradley v. Lee

Cal. 1869

4 : 470

Maine Boys’ Co. v. Boston Co.

Cal. 1869

12 : 247

Correa v. Frietas

Cal. 1871

2 : 336

Higgins v. Barker

Cal. 1871

7 : 525

Spencer v. Winselman

Cal. 1871

2 : 334

Gregory v. Harris

Cal. 1872

14 : 91

Harvey v. Ryan

Cal. 1872

4 : 490

Marquart v. Bradford

Cal. 1872

5 : 528

Alford v. Barnum

Cal. 1873

10 : 422

Strang v. Ryan

Cal. 1873

1 : 48

McGarrahan v. New Idria Co.

Cal. 1874

11 : 641

Quirk v. Falk

Cal. 1874

2 : 19

McLaughlin v. Powell

Cal. 1875

10 : 424

Raffetto v. Fiori

Cal. 1875

14 : 469

Robinson v. Black Diamond Coal Co.

Cal. 1875

14 : 93

San Felipe Co. v. Belshaw

Cal. 1875

5 : 315

Brandt v. Wheaton

Cal. 1877

1 : 145

Efford v. South P. Coast RR Co.

Cal. 1877

7 : 557

Morenhaut v. Wilson

Cal. 1877

1 : 53

Stone v. Geyser Co.

Cal. 1877

1 : 59

Gelchich v. Moriarty

Cal. 1878

9 : 498

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-132- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Holland v. Mount Auburn Co. Cal. 1878 9 : 497 Seymour v. Wood

Cal. 1878

1 : 62

Keyes v. Little York Co.

Cal. 1879

14 : 95

Myers v. Spooner

Cal. 1880

9 : 519

Phenix Co. v. Lawrence

Cal. 1880

12 : 261

Mont Blanc Co. v. Debour

Cal. 1882

15 : 286

DuPrat v. James

Cal. 1884

15 : 341

Rough v. Simmons

Cal. 1884

15 : 298

Horswell v. Ruiz

Cal. 1885

15 : 488

Taylor v. Middleton

Cal. 1885

15 : 284

McCormick v. Rossi

Cal. 1886

15 : 433

Garthe v. Hart

Cal. 1887

15 : 492

Gregory v. Pershbaker

Cal. 1887

15 : 602

Champion Co. v. Consolidated Wyo. Co.

Cal. 1888

16 : 145

Pharis v. Muldoon

Cal. 1888

15 : 348

Gale v. Best

Cal. 1889

17 : 186

Miller v. Butterfield

Cal. 1889

17 : 222

White v. Lee

Cal. 1889

17 : 209

Anthony v. Jullson

Cal. 1890

16 : 26

DeNoon v. Morrison

Cal. 1890

16 : 33

Doe v. Sanger

Cal. 1890

17 : 298

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1892

17 : 497

Mills v. Fletcher

Cal. 1893

17 : 671

Quigley v. Gillett

Cal. 1894

18 : 68

Moore v. Hamerstag

Cal. 1895

18 : 256

Stinchfield v. Gillis

Cal. 1895

18 : 195

Altoona Q. Co. v. Integral Q. Co.

Cal. 1896

18 : 410

Trevaskis v. Peard

Cal. 1896

18 : 353

Argonaut M. Co. v. Kennedy M. Co.

Cal. 1900

21 : 163

Conway v. Hart

Cal. 1900

21 : 20

McCann v. McMillan

Cal. 1900

21 : 6

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-133- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Talmadge v. St. John Cal. 1900 21 : 13 Cranes Gulch M. Co. v. Scherrer

Cal. 1901

21 : 549

Eaton v. Norris

Cal. 1901

21 : 205

Emerson v. McWhirter

Cal. 1901

21 : 470

Tuolumne Consol. M. Co. v. Maier

Cal. 1901

21 : 678

Wright v. Killian

Cal. 1901

21 : 211

Yreka M. & M. Co. v. Knight

Cal. 1901

21 : 478

Temescal Oil M. Co. v. Salcido

Cal. 1902

22 : 360

Hugunin v. McCunniff

Colo. 1874

14 : 463

Sullivan v. Hense

Colo. 1874

9 : 487

Patterson v. Hitchcock

Colo. 1877

5 : 542

Sears v. Taylor

Colo. 1877

5 : 318

Corning Tunnel Co. v. Pell

Colo. 1878

14 : 612

Little Gunnell Co. v. Kimber

Colo. 1878

1 : 536

Wolfley v. Lebanon Co.

Colo. 1878

13 : 282

Johnson v. Buell

Colo. 1879

9 : 502

Murphy v. Cobb

Colo. 1880

5 : 330

Pollard v. Shively

Colo. 1880

2 : 229

Derry v. Ross

Colo. 1881

1 : 1

Miller v. Taylor

Colo. 1881

9 : 547

Armstrong v. Lower

Colo. 1882

15 : 631

Armstrong v. Lower

Colo. 1883

15 : 458

Cullacott v. Cash Co.

Colo. 1884

15 : 392

McGinnis v. Egbert

Colo. 1884

15 : 329

Strepey v. Stark

Colo. 1884

17 : 28

Rockwell v. Graham

Colo. 1885

15 : 299

Becker v. Pugh

Colo. 1886

15 : 304

Consol. Rep. Co. v. Lebanon Co.

Colo. 1886

15 : 490

Drummond v. Long

Colo. 1886

15 : 510

Fuller v. Swan River Co.

Colo. 1888

16 : 252

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-134- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Little Pitt. Co. v. L. Chf. Co. Colo. 1888 15 : 655 Marshall Co. v. Kirtley

Colo. 1888

16 : 6

Omar v. Soper

Colo. 1888

15 : 496

Lee v. Stahl

Colo. 1889

16 : 152

Omaha & Grant Co. v. Tabor

Colo. 1889

16 : 184

Thomas v. Chisholm

Colo. 1889

16 : 122

Hunt v. Eureka Gulch M. Co.

Colo. 1890

17 : 340

Drake v. Gilpin County M. Co.

Colo. 1891

17 : 396

Hall v. Kearny

Colo. 1893

17 : 594

Justice M. Co. v. Lee

Colo. 1895

18 : 220

Girard v. Carson

Colo. 1896

18 : 346

Hallack v. Traber

Colo. 1896

18 : 360

Argonaut Consolidated Co. v. Turner

Colo. 1897

18 : 556

Catron v. Old

Colo. 1897

18 : 569

Taylor v. Parenteau

Colo. 1897

18 : 534

Wakeman v. Norton

Colo. 1897

18 : 698

Calhoun Gold Co. v. Ajax Gold Co.

Colo. 1899

20 : 192

Mt. Rosa M., M. & L. Co. v. Palmer

Colo. 1899

19 : 696

Beals v. Cone

Colo. 1900

20 : 591

Brewster v. Shoemaker

Colo. 1900

21 : 155

Healey v. Rupp

Colo. 1900

21 : 117

Niles v. Kennan

Colo. 1900

21 : 33

Cleary v. Skiffich

Colo. 1901

21 : 284

Haynes v. Briscoe

Colo. 1901

21 : 720

Kirk v. Meldrum

Colo. 1901

21 : 393

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey

Colo. 1903

22 : 585

Davis v. Shepherd

Colo. 1903

22 : 575

Rebecca Gold M. Co. v. Bryant

Colo. 1903

22 : 538

Duncan v. Fulton

Colo. App. 1900

20 : 522

Malaby v. Rice

Colo. App. 1900

21 : 29

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-135- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Buckeye M. & M. Co. v. Carlson Colo. App. 1901 21 : 499 Buck v. Jones

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 467

Cerrusite M. Co. v. Steele

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 462

Pennsylvania M. Co. v. Bales

Colo. App. 1902

22 : 436

Flaherty v. Gwinn

Dakota 1878-79

12 : 605

Golden Terra Co. v. Mahler

Dakota 1879

4 : 390

Duggan v. Davey

Dakota 1886

17 : 59

Moore v. Ferrell

Georgia 1846

7 : 281

Smith v. City of Rome

Georgia 1855

7 : 306

Yahoola River Co. v. Irby

Georgia 1869

14 : 460

Pool v. Lewis

Georgia 1870

5 : 523

Atkins v. Hendree

Idaho 1867

2 : 328

Kramer v. Settle

Idaho 1873

9 : 561

Ralston v. Plowman

Idaho 1875

5 : 160

Rosenthal v. Ives

Idaho 1887

15 : 324

Schultz v. Keeler

Idaho 1889

17 : 198

Burke v. McDonald

Idaho 1890

17 : 325

Gilpin v. Sierra Nevada M. Co.

Idaho 1890

17 : 310

Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold M. Co.

Idaho 1893

17 : 548

Van Buren v. McKinley

Idaho 1901

21 : 690

Morrison v. Regan

Idaho 1902

22 : 69

McGoon v. Ankeny

Ill. 1850

1 : 9

Kamphouse v. Gaffner

Ill. 1874

2 : 257

Daniels v. Hilgard

Ill. 1875

15 : 280

Stewart v. Munford

Ill. 1878

5 : 555

Wilms v. Jess

Ill. 1880

14 : 56

Jones v. Robertson

Ill. 1886

15 : 703

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-136- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Yards v. Wright

Ind. 1879

14 : 32

Lorimier v. Lewis

Iowa 1843

12 : 437

Ferron v. Sturgeon

Iowa 1859

4 : 319

Stewart v. Chadwick

Iowa 1859

13 : 236

Wickersham v. Chicago Zinc Co.

Kansas 1877

5 : 536

Adams v. Briggs Co.

Mass. 1851

13 : 225

Stockbridge Co. v. Cone Co.

Mass. 1869

6 : 317

Gilmore v. Driscoll

Mass. 1877

14 : 37

Wilkins v. Monson Consol. Slate Co.

Me. 1902

22 : 185

Mandlebaum v. North Amer. Co.

Mich. 1857

5 : 506

Westcott v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1871

6 : 336

Edwards v. Allouez Co.

Mich. 1878

7 : 577

National Co. v. Minnesota Co.

Mich. 1885

17 : 44

Lockwood v. Lunsford

Mo. 1874

7 : 532

Funk v. Haldeman

Mont. 1866

7 : 203

Conner v. McPhee

Mont. 1868

9 : 570

King v. Edwards

Mont. 1870

4 : 480

Lincoln v. Rogers

Mont. 1870

14 : 79

Herbert v. King

Mont. 1872

5 : 303

Orr v. Haskell

Mont. 1874

4 : 492

Territory v. Lee

Mont. 1874

6 : 248

Foote v. National Co.

Mont. 1876

9 : 605

Moxon v. Wilkinson

Mont. 1876

12 : 602

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-137- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Stapleton v. Pease Mont. 1877 9 : 574 Belk v. Meagher

Mont. 1878

1 : 522

Gonu v. Russell

Mont. 1879

12 : 630

Meyendorf v. Frohner

Mont. 1879

5 : 559

Shafer v. Constans

Mont. 1879

1 : 147

Pardee v. Murray

Mont. 1882

15 : 515

Russell v. Chumasero

Mont. 1882

15 : 508

Hopkins v. Noyes

Mont. 1883

15 : 287

Leggatt v. Stewart

Mont. 1883

15 : 358

Renshaw v. Switzer

Mont. 1887

15 : 345

Upton v. Larkin

Mont. 1888

15 : 404

Freezer v. Sweeney

Mont. 1889

17 : 179

McCauley v. McKeig

Mont. 1889

16 : 1

King v. Amy & Silversmith Co.

Mont. 1890

16 : 38

St. Louis M. Co. v. Montana Co.

Mont. 1890

17 : 283

Honaker v. Martin

Mont. 1891

17 : 404

Metcalf v. Prescott

Mont. 1891

16 : 137

Hoffman v. Beecher

Mont. 1892

17 : 503

Mattingly v. Lewisohn

Mont. 1893

17 : 693

Casey v. Thieviege

Mont. 1897

18 : 624

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1897

19 : 186

Hamilton v. Huson

Mont. 1898

19 : 274

Montana M. Co. v. St. Louis M. Co.

Mont. 1898

19 : 218

Basin M. & C. Co. v. White

Mont. 1899

19 : 690

Bramlett v. Flick

Mont. 1899

20 : 103

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1899

20 : 1

Murray v. Polglase

Mont. 1899

20 : 296

Sanders v. Noble

Mont. 1899

19 : 650

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1900

21 : 98

Power v. Sla

Mont. 1900

20 : 659

Maloney v. King

Mont. 1901

21 : 278

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-138- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Parrot Silver & C. Co. v. Heinze Mont. 1901 21 : 232 Anaconda Copper M. Co. v. Heinze

Mont. 1902

22 : 346

McDermott M. Co. v. McDermott

Mont. 1902

22 : 338

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1902

22 : 471

State ex rel. Heinze v. Dist. Court

Mont. 1902

22 : 195

Gemmell v. Swain

Mont. 1903

22 : 716

Montana Ore P. Co. v. Boston Co.

Mont. 1903

22 : 555

Perley v. Langley

N.H. 1834

4 : 235

Shaw v. Wallace

N.J. 1856

14 : 420

Huffman v. Hummer

N.J. 1866

2 : 242

Keeler v. Green

N.J. 1870

12 : 465

McAndrews v. Tippett

N.J. 1876

14 : 616

Cent’l RR Co. v. Stand’d O. Co.

N.J. 1880

7 : 604

United RR Co. v. Stand’d O. Co.

N.J. 1880

7 : 625

Vanatta v. Brewer

N.J. 1880

6 : 358

Ex’rs of Lord v. Carbon Co.

N.J. 1884

15 : 695

Lord, Ex’rs of v. Carbon Co.

N.J. 1884

15 : 695

Zeckendorf v. Hutchinson

N. Mex. 1871

9 : 483

Lockhart v. Wills

N. Mex. 1898

19 : 497

Deeney v. Mineral Creek Milling Co.

N. Mex. 1902

22 : 47

Jackson v. Olitz

N.Y. 1832

5 : 202

West Point Co. v. Reymert

N.Y. 1871

7 : 528

Mallett v. Uncle Sam Co.

Nev. 1865

1 : 17

Oreamuno v. Uncle Sam Co.

Nev. 1865

1 : 32

State v. Real del Monte Co.

Nev. 1865

4 : 334

Van Valkenburg v. Huff

Nev. 1865

9 : 467

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-139- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Bullion Co. v. Croesus Co. Nev. 1866 5 : 254 Chase v. Savage Co.

Nev. 1866

9 : 476

Gottschall v. Melsing

Nev. 1866

1 : 667

Courchaine v. Bullion Co.

Nev. 1868

12 : 235

Lady Bryan Co. v. Lady B. Co.

Nev. 1868

7 : 478

Sherman v. Clark

Nev. 1868

7 : 483

Robinson v. Imperial Co.

Nev. 1869

10 : 370

Brandow v. Pocotillo Co.

Nev. 1870

4 : 337

Leet v. John Dare Co.

Nev. 1870

4 : 487

Silver Mining Co. v. Fall

Nev. 1870

5 : 283

Overman Co. v. American Co.

Nev. 1872

2 : 251

Phillpotts v. Blasdel

Nev. 1872

4 : 341

Rogers v. Cooney

Nev. 1872

14 : 85

Schissler v. Chesshire

Nev. 1872

5 : 309

420 Co. v. Bullion Co.

Nev. 1874

1 : 114

Magnet Co. v. Panaca Co.

Nev. 1874

7 : 540

Sierra Nevada Co. v. Sears

Nev. 1875

7 : 549

Golden Fleece Co. v. Cable Co.

Nev. 1877

1 : 120

Thorn v. Sweeney

Nev. 1877

7 : 564

Gleeson v. Martin White Co.

Nev. 1878

9 : 429

Rivers v. Burbank

Nev. 1878

7 : 583

Blaisdell v. Stephens

Nev. 1879

7 : 599

Overman Co. v. Corcoran

Nev. 1880

1 : 691

Southern Cr. Co. v. Europa Co.

Nev. 1880

9 : 513

Steel v. Gold Lead Co.

Nev. 1883

15 : 292

Jones v. Prospect Mountain Co.

Nev. 1892

17 : 530

Craw v. Wilson

Nev. 1895

18 : 244

Nesbitt v. Delamar’s Nev. Gold Co.

Nev. 1898

19 : 286

Sisson v. Sommers

Nev. 1899

19 : 644

Irwin v. Davidson

No. Car. 1844

7 : 237

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-140- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Johnston v. Shelton No. Car. 1845 4 : 308 McBrayer v. Hardin

No. Car. 1850

7 : 288

Emmons v. McKesson

No. Car. 1859

7 : 409

Gold Hill Co. v. Ish

Oregon 1873

11 : 635

Chapman v. Toy Long

Oregon 1876

1 : 497

Dodge v. Marden

Oregon 1879

1 : 63

Risch v. Wiseman

Oregon 1900

20 : 409

Crown Point Gold M. Co. v. Crismon

Oregon 1901

21 : 406

Baker v. King

Penna. 1851

14 : 404

Shoenberger v. Baker

Penna. 1853

14 : 412

Spencer v. Kunkle

Penna. 1853

2 : 18

Turner v. Reynolds

Penna. 1854

12 : 190

Tiley v. Moyers

Penna. 1855

15 : 259

Dundas v. Muhlenberg’s Exec’rs

Penna. 1860

14 : 437

Blewett v. Coleman

Penna. 1861

11 : 160

Clement v. Youngman

Penna. 1861

5 : 230

Tiley v. Moyers

Penna. 1862

4 : 320

Troxell v. Lehigh Crane Co.

Penna. 1862

5 : 517

Armstrong v. Caldwell

Penna. 1866

13 : 252

McKnight v. Kreutz

Penna. 1866

6 : 305

Kreutz v. McKnight

Penna. 1867

6 : 314

Mammoth Vein Co. Appeal

Penna. 1867

7 : 460

Munson v. Tryon

Penna. 1867

7 : 469

Schuylkill & D. Co. v. Schmoele

Penna. 1868

7 : 480

Douty v. Bird

Penna. 1869

14 : 454

Rynd v. Rynd Farm Co.

Penna. 1869

5 : 275

Jones v. Wagner

Penna. 1870

13 : 690

Karns v. Tanner

Penna. 1870

5 : 289

Grubb v. Grubb

Penna. 1873

7 : 226

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-141- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Mercer Co. v. McKee’s Adm’r Penna. 1874 5 : 531 Horner v. Watson

Penna. 1875

14 : 1

Lawrence and Others’ Appeal

Penna. 1875

7 : 542

Coleman v. Chadwick

Penna. 1876

14 : 9

Westmoreland Coal Appeal

Penna. 1877

10 : 394

Scranton v. Phillips

Penna. 1880

14 : 48

Appeal of Erwin

Penna. 1887

16 : 91

Miller v. Chester Slate Co.

Penna. 1889

16 : 288

Dexter Co. v. Dexter

R.I. 1859

4 : 291

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 615

Reagan v. McKibben

S. Dak. 1898

19 : 556

McCarthy v. Speed

S. Dak. 1899

20 : 124

Elder v. Horseshoe M. & M. Co.

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 510

Regan v. Whittaker

S. Dak. 1901

21 : 309

Snodgrass v. Ward

Tenn. 1816

4 : 306

West v. Lanier

Tenn. 1849

12 : 184

Lyon v. Woodman

Utah 1870

7 : 493

Houtz v. Gisborn

Utah 1874

2 : 340

Leitham v. Cusick

Utah 1875

7 : 546

Old Telegraph Co. v. Central Co.

Utah 1876

7 : 555

Roberts v. Wilson

Utah 1876

4 : 498

Kahn v. Old Telegraph Co.

Utah 1877

7 : 559

Kahn v. Old Telegraph Co.

Utah 1877

11 : 645

Smith v. Richardson

Utah 1877

1 : 139

Blake v. Butte Co.

Utah c. 1877-80

9 : 503

McCormick v. Varnes

Utah c. 1878-80

9 : 505

Eilers v. Boatman

Utah 1883

15 : 462

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-142- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Bullion B. Co. v. Eureka H. Co. Utah 1887 15 : 449 Bennett v. Shaughnessy

Utah 1889

16 : 276

Hayes v. Lavagnino

Utah 1898

19 : 485

Muldoon v. Brown

Utah 1899

20 : 269

Silver City G. & S. M. Co. v. Lowry

Utah 1899

20 : 55

Fissure M. Co. v. Old Susan M. Co.

Utah 1900

21 : 125

Strickley v. Hill

Utah 1900

20 : 722

Wells v. Davis

Utah 1900

21 : 1

Copper Globe M. Co. v. Allman

Utah 1901

21 : 296

Murray Hill M. & M. Co. v. Havenor

Utah 1901

21 : 668

Scott v. Crouch

Utah 1902

22 : 117

Lavagnino v. Uhlig

Utah 1903

22 : 610

Anderson v. Harvey’s Heirs

Virginia 1853

7 : 291

Bash v. Cascade M. Co.

Wash. 1902

22 : 299

Cedar Canyon M. Co. v. Yarwood

Wash. 1902

22 : 11

Yarwood v. Johnson

Wash. 1902

22 : 398

Raisbeck v. Anthony

Wisc. 1888

17 : 148

Bracken v. Preston

Wisc. 1845

7 : 267

Boyle v. Laird

Wisc. 1853

7 : 301

Gillett v. Treganza

Wisc. 1861

7 : 432

Sobey v. Thomas

Wisc. 1876

4 : 359

Clegg v. Jones

Wisc. 1878

7 : 573

Lampe v. Kennedy

Wisc. 1878

2 : 266

Sunday Lake Co. v. Wakefield

Wisc. 1888

16 : 97

Hartney v. Gosling

Wyo. 1902

22 : 239

British and Canadian Cases

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-143- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Madden v. Connell Canada Br. Col. 1899 20 : 158 Comyn v. Kyneto

U.K. 2 James I c.1604

5 : 198

Whittingham v. Andrews

U.K. 1692

5 : 198

Bishop of London v. Web

U.K. 1718

7 : 247

Dean etc. of Ely v. Warren

U.K. 1741

4 : 233

Goodright v. Swymmer

U.K. 1756

5 : 200

Morris v. Smith

U.K. 1783

6 : 22

Wentworth v. Turner

U.K. 1795

7 : 249

Mitchell v. Dors

U.K. 1801

7 : 250

Outram v. Morewood

U.K. 1803

5 : 484

Grey v. Duke of Northumberland

U.K. 1806

7 : 250

Earl Cowper v. Baker

U.K. 1810

7 : 253

Grey v. Duke of Northumberland

U.K. 1810

7 : 251

Thomas v. Oakley

U.K. 1811

7 : 254

Field v. Beaumont

U.K. 1818

7 : 257

Doe v. Bancks

U.K. 1821

6 : 278

Rowe v. Grenfel

U.K. 1826

13 : 234

Rex v. Inhabi’ts of Sedgley

U.K. 1831

10 : 390

Clayton v. Gregson

U.K. 1835

9 : 141

Capner v. Flemington Co.

U.K. 1836

7 : 263

Partridge v. Scott

U.K. 1838

13 : 640

Quarrington v. Arthur

U.K. 1842

15 : 255

Wild v. Holt

U.K. 1842

12 : 182

Earl of Rosse v. Wainman

U.K. 1845

10 : 398

Jeffries v. Williams

U.K. 1850

13 : 645

Nicklin v. Williams

U.K. 1854

13 : 650

Darvill v. Roper

U.K. 1855

10 : 406

Feversham v. Emerson

U.K. 1855

5 : 500

Smart v. Morton

U.K. 1855

13 : 655

Dugdale v. Robertson

U.K. 1857

13 : 662

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-144- June 2000

Case Name

Jurisdiction-Date

Vol. : Page

Haines v. Roberts U.K. 1857 13 : 668 Bill v. Sierra Nevada Co.

U.K. 1859

7 : 413

Brown v. Robins

U.K. 1859

13 : 669

Backhouse v. Bonomi

U.K. 1861

13 : 677

Buckley v. Howell

U.K. 1861

13 : 245

Elwell v. Crowther

U.K. 1862

7 : 438

Spencer v. Scurr

U.K. 1862

10 : 388

Baird v. Williamson

U.K. 1863

4 : 368

Shafto v. Johnson

U.K. 1863

15 : 262

Williams v. Groucott

U.K. 1863

13 : 632

Davis v. Shepherd

U.K. 1865

6 : 24

Roberts v. Rose

U.K. 1865

14 : 441

Bell v. Wilson

U.K. 1866

10 : 415

Williams v. Bagnall

U.K. 1866

13 : 686

Lewis v. Fothergill

U.K. 1869

15 : 271

Smith v. Darby

U.K. 1872

13 : 695

Hext v. Gill

U.K. Cornwall 1872

17 : 1

Birmingham v. Allen

U.K. 1876

14 : 14

Wilson v. Waddell

U.K. 1876

14 : 25

Kinsman v. Jackson

U.K. 1880

6 : 352

Newton v. Nock

U.K. 1880

7 : 611

Strelley v. Pearson

U.K. 1880

7 : 618

Davis v. Treharne

U.K. 1881

14 : 60

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-145- June 2000

VI. VOLUME REFERENCES TO INDEX SUBJECTS

COLLECTING CASES THROUGH MID-1890

Supplemental cases, added chronologically, appear in Volume 17 from within the period covered in Volumes 1

- 16 (through mid-1890). The apparent division point in Volume 17 is at the end of page 347.

Index Subject

Vols. 1-15

Vol. 15

Vol. 16

Vol. 17

Abandonment

1 : 1

15 : 284

16 : 1

Accident

1 : 68

Account

1 : 72

Act of God

1 : 107

ADVERSE CLAIM

1 : 114

15 : 286

16 : 6

17 : 340

Adverse Possession

1 : 152

Agent

1 : 241

16 : 16

17 : 198

Agricultural Land(s)

1 : 492

Aliens

1 : 497

15 : 324

16 : 26

Annual Labor

1 : 510

15 : 329

16 : 33

APEX

1 : 548

16 : 38

17 : 59

"

17 : 109

"

17 : 310

APPROPRIATION

1 : 583

Appurtenances

2 : 18

Arbitration

2 : 23

Assay

2 : 28

15 : 350

Assessment

2 : 33

Assignment

2 : 36

Assumpsit

2 : 49

Attorney

2 : 65

Bailment

2 : 77

Barriers

2 : 89

17 : 44

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-146- June 2000

Index Subject

Vols. 1-15

Vol. 15

Vol. 16

Vol. 17

Bills and Notes 2 : 116 15 : 355 Blasting

2 : 187

Bond

2 : 217

Boundaries

2 : 229

15 : 358

17 : 117

Brick

2 : 274

Broker

2 : 276

CLAIM

2 : 305

Coal

2 : 346

Colliery

2 : 389

Common Carrier

2 : 417

Confusion

2 : 430

Consideration

2 : 443

Contract

2 : 458

15 : 360

16 : 55

Conveyance

3 : 217

15 : 378

Cornwall Ore Banks

3 : 416

Corporation(s)

3 : 435

15 : 380

16 : 65

17 : 226

Covenant

4 : 119

Crimes

4 : 161

Custom

4 : 233

Dam

4 : 240

Delivery

4 : 282

DESCRIPTION

4 : 291

15 : 392

DIP

4 : 368

16 : 75

DISCOVERY

4 : 390

15 : 404

DISTRICT RULES

4 : 447

17 : 201

Ditch

4 : 504

Dower

5 : 47

Drainage

5 : 78

17 : 134

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-147- June 2000

Index Subject

Vols. 1-15

Vol. 15

Vol. 16

Vol. 17

Dump 5 : 160 16 : 91 Easement

5 : 163

EJECTMENT

5 : 198

17 : 127

Eminent Domain

5 : 333

Equity

5 : 444

ESTOPPEL

5 : 484

Evidence

5 : 587

Exception

5 : 656

Execution

5 : 662

Executors and Administrators

5 : 670

Exhausted Mine

---

15 : 415

17 : 105

Expert

6 : 1

Fault(geological)

6 : 22

17 : 148

Fixtures

6 : 34

16 : 93

Flooding

6 : 129

17 : 40

Flume

6 : 203

Forcible Entry

6 : 210

Forfeiture

6 : 248

15 : 433

16 : 97

Fraud

6 : 363

15 : 435

16 : 103

17 : 169

"

17 : 213

Gold Dust

7 : 156

Guaranty

7 : 181

Guardian and Ward

7 : 189

Highways

7 : 193

Incorporeal Hereditaments

7 : 203

INJUNCTION

7 : 237

15 : 447

Injunction Bond

7 : 639

Inspection

7 : 667

17 : 283

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-148- June 2000

Index Subject

Vols. 1-15

Vol. 15

Vol. 16

Vol. 17

Instroke 8 : 52 Insurance

8 : 53

Irrigation

8 : 64

Jurisdiction

8 : 138

Juror - Jury

8 : 153

Laches

8 : 163

Land

8 : 301

Lease

8 : 316

15 : 453

16 : 108

17 : 137

"

17 : 253

Level

9 : 141

Libel and Slander

9 : 149

License

9 : 175

16 : 116

17 : 242

Lien

9 : 343

LOCATION

9 : 429

15 : 458

16 : 122

17 : 298

Location Certificate

9 : 561

15 : 508

16 : 137

LODE

9 : 578

16 : 145

17 : 260

"

17 : 325

Lunatic

9 : 643

Mandamus

9 : 659

Married Women

9 : 664

Master and Servant

9 : 672

15 : 535

Measure of Damages

10 : 66

15 : 544

16 : 159

Merger

10 : 322

Mexican Grant

10 : 334

Mill Site

10 : 370

Mine(s)

10 : 388

Mineral(s)

10 : 398

17 : 1

Mineral Lands

10 : 422

17 : 186

Mineral Springs

10 : 428

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-149- June 2000

Index Subject

Vols. 1-15

Vol. 15

Vol. 16

Vol. 17

Mistake

10 : 434

Mortgage

10 : 525

Natural Gas

---

15 : 556

16 : 165

Negligence

10 : 614

15 : 559

16 : 171

17 : 123

Notice

11 : 11

Nuisance

11 : 21

Occupation

11 : 98

Oil

11 : 103

16 : 179

17 : 22

"

17 : 164

Option

11 : 152

Ore

11 : 160

16 : 184

17 : 333

Parties

11 : 168

Partition

11 : 183

Partnership

11 : 223

15 : 562

16 : 201

PATENT

11 : 608

15 : 575

Personal Liability

11 : 698

Personal Property

12 : 62

PLACERS

---

15 : 591

16 : 214

17 : 179

"

17 : 209

Pleading and Practice

12 : 73

POSSESSION

12 : 178

Prescription

12 : 269

Prospecting Contract

12 : 276

15 : 617

16 : 236

17 : 222

Prospectus

12 : 405

Public Domain

12 : 418

Quarries(Quarry)

12 : 465

Quo Warranto

12 : 512

Railroads

12 : 521

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-150- June 2000

Index Subject

Vols. 1-15

Vol. 15

Vol. 16

Vol. 17

Receiver 12 : 568 Record

12 : 602

Release

12 : 609

RELOCATION

12 : 630

15 : 631

17 : 28

Rents and Royalties

12 : 635

16 : 239

Replevin

12 : 674

Rescission

13 : 8

17 : 94

Reservation

13 : 40

Riparian Rights

13 : 161

Sale

13 : 169

Salines

13 : 182

School Lands

13 : 195

Severance

13 : 225

16 : 243

Share - Shareholder

13 : 259

SIDE LINES

13 : 282

15 : 641

Specific Performance

13 : 292

15 : 649

Springs

13 : 374

Statute of Frauds

13 : 383

Statute of Limitations

13 : 408

Stock - Stockholder

13 : 435

Surface

13 : 632

Surface Support

13 : 640

Tailings

14 : 72

16 : 252

Tax

14 : 103

Tenant(s) in Common

14 : 221

16 : 260

17 : 246

Tenant(s) for Life

14 : 358

Timber

14 : 371

Time

14 : 389

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-151- June 2000

Index Subject

Vols. 1-15

Vol. 15

Vol. 16

Vol. 17

Tin Streaming 14 : 397 TRESPASS

14 : 403

15 : 655

16 : 263

Trover

14 : 472

17 : 143

Trust(s)

14 : 522

15 : 675

Tunnel(s)

14 : 612

16 : 276

Vendor and Purchaser

14 : 623

15 : 687

16 : 281

Ventilation

15 : 6

Wages

15 : 47

Warranty

15 : 70

Waste

15 : 109

Water

15 : 162

Way

15 : 215

17 : 279

Weights and Measures

15 : 243

15 : 691

Workings

15 : 255

15 : 695

16 : 288

17 : 194

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-152- June 2000

VII. MORRISON’S CUMULATED INDEX – DIGEST TITLES,

VOLUMES 1 - 16

PRINCIPAL SUBJECTS

Index / Digest-Only Headings Cases Indexed [ Vol. : Page ]

ABANDONMENT [1 : 1-67, 15 : 284-285 and 16 : 1-5]

Accession

ACCIDENT

ACCOUNT

Acknowledgment

ACT OF GOD

Admissions

ADVERSE CLAIM [1 : 114-151, 15 : 286-323, 16 : 6-15, and 17 : 340]

ADVERSE POSSESSION

Affidavit

AGENT

A. Appointment: Proof of Agency

B. Relation to Principal

C. Relation to Third Parties

D. Powers of

E. Ratification

F. Revocation

G. Admissions by

H. Compensation

AGRICULTURAL LAND(S) [1 : 492-496]

ALIENS [1 : 497-509 and 15 : 324-328 and 16 : 26-32]

Alterations and Erasures

Amendment

ANNUAL LABOR [1 : 510 - 547 and 15 : 329 - 349 and 16 : 33 - 35]

APEX [1 : 548-582 and 16 : 38-54 and 17 : 59, 109 & 310]

Appeal

APPROPRIATION [1 : 583 - 699]

APPURTENANCES [2 : 18 - 22]

ARBITRATION

ASSAY

ASSESSMENT

ASSIGNMENT

ASSUMPSIT

Attachment

ATTORNEY

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-153- June 2000

Attorney at Law

Attorney in Fact

BAILMENT

BARRIERS

Bill of Exceptions

BILLS AND NOTES

A. In General

B. Execution - Delivery - Parol Evidence

C. Consideration

D. Negotiability

E. Checks

F. Indorsement - Assignment

G. Bona Fide Holder

H. Acceptance

I. Pleading

BLASTING

Bona Fide Purchaser

BOND

BOUNDARIES [2 : 229-273, 15 : 358-360, and 17 : 117]

BRICK

BROKER

Certiorari

CLAIM [2 : 305 - 345]

Change of Venue

COAL

COLLIERY

COMMON CARRIER

Common Law

Condition

CONFUSION

CONSIDERATION

Conspiracy

Constitution

Contempt

Continuance

CONTRACT

A. Parties

B. Execution - Delivery

C. Consideration

D. Construction

E. Performance - Enforcement - Condition

F. Abandonment - Rescission - Survival - Estoppel

G. Public Policy

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-154- June 2000

H. Evidence

I. Ratification

J. Measure of Damages

K. Miscellaneous

Conversion

CONVEYANCE

A. In General

B. Parties

C. Consideration

D Description

E. Execution

F. Agreement for - Escrow

G Severance

H. Quit Claim

I. Warranty

J Construction

K. Possession - Verbal Sale - Bill of Sale

L. Notice - Innocent Purchaser - Record

M. Void

N. Acknowledgment

CORNWALL ORE BANKS

CORPORATION(S)

A. Organization - Articles - Charter

B. Officers - Agents

C. Stock

D. Stockholders

E. Elections - Meetings

F. By-laws

G. Contracts - Power - Duties

H. Personal Liability

I. Seal

J. Dissolution - Consolidation

K. Quo Warranto

L. Ultra Vires

M. Fraud

N. Miscellaneous

O. Foreign

Costs

COVENANT

CRIMES

Cross Lode

CUSTOM [4 : 233-239]

DAM

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-155- June 2000

Debt

Default

DELIVERY

Demand

Deposition

DESCRIPTION [4 : 291-367 and 15 : 392-403]

Devise

Diligence

DIP [4 : 368-389 and 16 : 75-90]

DISCOVERY [4 : 390-446 and 15 : 404-414]

Discovery - Discovery Shaft

DISTRICT RULES [4 : 447-503 and 17 : 201]

DITCH

DOWER

DRAINAGE

DUMP [5 : 160-162 and 16 : 91-92]

Duress

EASEMENT

EJECTMENT [5 : 198-332 and 17 : 127]

EMINENT DOMAIN

End Lines (see Location; Side Lines)

EQUITY

Error

Escrow

ESTOPPEL [5 : 484-586]

EVIDENCE

A. Admissions and Declarations

B. Best and Secondary

C. Burden of Proof

D. Certificates - Copies - Lost Papers

E. Circumstantial

F. Corporation(s)

G. Cross-Examination

H. Documentary

I. Fraud

J. Handwriting

K. Identity

L. Judicial Notice

M. Irrelevant

N. Leading Questions

O. Letters

P. Measure of Damages

Q. Memoranda

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-156- June 2000

R. Negligence

S. Objections to Testimony

T. Opinions - Belief

U. Parol to Vary Writing

V. Presumptions - Privileged Communications

W. Rebuttal

X. Records

Y. Variance

Z. Weight and Sufficiency - Witness

EXCEPTION

EXECUTION

EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS

EXHAUSTED MINE

EXPERT

FAULT(GEOLOGICAL) [6 : 22-33 and 17 : 148]

Findings

FIXTURES

FLOODING

FLUME

FORCIBLE ENTRY

FORFEITURE [6 : 248-362 and 15 : 433-434 and 16 : 97-102]

Former Recovery

FRAUD

A. In General

B. By Vendor

C. By Vendee

D. Between Associates

E. By or upon Agents

F. Against Creditors

G. Bona Fide Purchasers

H. Laches

I. Practice - Parties - Evidence

Furnace

Garnishment

Gift

GOLD DUST

GUARANTY

GUARDIAN AND WARD

HIGHWAYS

Homestead

Husband and Wife

Hydraulics

INCORPOREAL HEREDITAMENTS [7 : 203-236]

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-157- June 2000

INDIAN RESERVATION

Indictment

Infant

INJUNCTION [7 : 237-638 and 15 : 447-452]

A. Jurisdiction

B. In General - Trespass and other Instances

C. Parties

D. Pleading

E. Practice

F. Notice

G. Prayer

H. Dissolution

I. Discretion - Insolvency

J. Title and Suit at Law

K. Mandatory

L. Accounting

M. Past Injuries

N. Laches - Estoppel

O. Appeal

P. Contempt

INJUNCTION BOND

Innocent Purchaser

Insolvency

INSPECTION

INSTROKE

Instructions

INSURANCE

Interest

IRRIGATION

Joinder

Joint Stock Company

Judgment

JURISDICTION

JUROR - JURY

Justice of the Peace

Known Lode (see Placers)

LACHES

LAND

Land Office

Lateral Support

LEASE

A. In General

B. The Term, The Thing Demised

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-158- June 2000

C. License - Parol Lease

D. The Covenants

E. Rents and Royalties

F. Assignment

G. Forfeiture - Abandonment - Eviction

H. Fixtures

Ledge (see Lode)

LEVEL [9 : 141-148]

LIBEL(AND SLANDER)

LICENSE

LIEN

Lis Pendens

LOCATION [9 : 429-560, 15 : 458-507, 16 : 122-136 and 17 : 298]

A. In General

B. Discovery

C. Notice

D. Staking - Monuments - Description

E. Record

F. By Agent

G. Lodes - Placers

H. Surface

I. Size of Claim - Length - Width - End Lines

J. Side Veins

K. Apex - Dip

L. Time - Priority

M. Possession

N. Trespass - Intimidation

O. Evidence - Presumptions

LOCATION CERTIFICATE [9 : 561-577, 15 : 508-514 and 16 : 137-144]

Location Notice

LODE [9 : 578-642, 15 : 515-534, 16 : 145-158 and 17 : 260 and 325]

Lost Papers

LUNATIC

Malicious Prosecution

MANDAMUS

Maps

MARRIED WOMEN

MASTER AND SERVANT

MEASURE OF DAMAGES

A. In General

B. In Actions Ex Contractu

C. In Actions Ex Delicto

D. Exemplary - Excessive

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-159- June 2000

E. Interest - Nominal

F. Liquidated

G. Damnum Absque Injuria

Mechanics’ Liens

MERGER

MEXICAN GRANT [10 : 334-369]

MILL SITE [10 : 370-387]

MINE(S) [10 : 388-397]

MINERAL(S) [10 : 398-421 and 17 : 1]

MINERAL LANDS [10 : 422-427 and 17 : 186]

MINERAL SPRINGS

Mining Claim

MISTAKE

MORTGAGE

Municipal Corporation(s)

NATURAL GAS

NEGLIGENCE

A. Defined - Instances

B. Degrees of - Measure of Damages

C. Parties - Master and Servant

D. Machinery - Workings - Mine Accidents

E. Knowledge - Notice

F. Pleading - Practice

G. Evidence

H. Contributory

New Trial

NOTICE

Novation

NUISANCE

OCCUPATION

Officer

OIL

OPTION

ORE [11 : 160-167, 16 : 184-200 and 17 : 333]

PARTIES

PARTITION

PARTNERSHIP

A. What Constitutes - Relations Inter Se

B. Powers - Liabilities

C. Funds - Assets - Assessments

D. Limited - Special

E. Mining Distinguished from Other Partnerships

F. Dissolution - Survivorship - Accounting

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-160- June 2000

G. Suits, by, between and against

PATENT [11 : 608-697, 15 : 575-590 and 16 : 205-213]

Payment

PERSONAL LIABILITY

PERSONAL PROPERTY

PLACERS [15 : 591-616, 16 : 214-235 and 17 : 179 and 209]

PLEADING AND PRACTICE

A. Admissions by Pleading

B. Amendment

C. Answer

D. Appeal

E. Assignment of Error

F. Bill of Exceptions

G. Change of Venue

H. Common Counts

I. Complaint

J. Continuance

K. Cross-Complaint

L. Default

M. Demurrer

N. Error and Review

O. Evidence - Witness

P. Findings

Q. Form of Action

R. Former Suit or Recovery

S. Instructions

T. Issue

U. Judgment and Decree

V. Jurisdiction

W. Motions - Notice - Orders - Rules

X. New Trial

Y. Non-Suit

Z. Parties - Joinder and Misjoinder

AA. Pleadings in General

BB. Prayer

CC. Process

DD. Remittitur

EE. Replication

FF. Trial - Reference - Jury

GG. Variance - Waiver

HH. Verdict

POSSESSION [12 : 178-268]

PRESCIPTION

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-161- June 2000

Principal and Surety

Probate

Process

Production of Papers

PROSPECTING CONTRACT

PROSPECTUS

PUBLIC DOMAIN [12 : 418-464]

QUARRIES(QUARRY) [12 : 465-469]

Quiet Title

QUO WARRANTO

RAILROADS

Ratification

Real Estate

RECEIVER

Receiver’s Receipt

RECORD [12 : 602-608]

Relation

RELEASE

RELOCATION [12 : 630-634, 15 : 631-640 and 17 : 28]

RENTS AND ROYALTIES

REPLEVIN

Res Adjudicata

RESCISSION

RESERVATION

RIPARIAN RIGHTS

SALE

SALINES

SCHOOL LANDS

Seal

Set-Off

SEVERANCE [13 : 225-258 and 16 : 243-251]

SHARE - SHAREHOLDER

Sheriff’s Sale

SIDE LINES [13 : 282-291 and 15 : 641-648]

Side Veins See Lode

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

SPRINGS

Statute

STATUTE OF FRAUDS

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

Stipulation

STOCK - STOCKHOLDER

Sunday

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-162- June 2000

SURFACE [13 : 632-639]

SURFACE SUPPORT [13 : 640-703]

TAILINGS [14 : 72-102 and 16 : 252-259]

TAX

TENANT(S) IN COMMON

TENANT(S) FOR LIFE

Tender

TIMBER

TIME

TIN STREAMING

Title Bond

TOWNSITE

TRESPASS [14 : 403-471, 15 : 655-674 and 16 : 263-275]

Trial

TROVER

TRUST(S)

TUNNEL(S) [14 : 612-622 and 16 : 276-280]

Ultra Vires

Usage

Variance

VENDOR AND PURCHASER

Vendor’s Lien

VENTILATION

Verdict

Vested Estate

Void and Voidable

WAGES

Waiver

WARRANTY

WASTE

WATER

Water-course

WAY

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Witness

WORKINGS [15 : 255-283 and 695-710, 16 : 288-290 and 17 : 194]

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-163- June 2000

VIII. APPENDIX: INDICES TO CASES COLLECTED IN VOLUMES 17-22

BUT NOT HEREINABOVE NAMED

Unlike the original sixteen-volume set, which contains a consolidated table of cases, there is no such

table consolidating the cases found in the last six volumes of Morrison’s Mining Reports. This Appendix lists

all cases found in those six volumes which are not listed in the indices and tables to which this list is appended.

At the foot of this Appendix is a table of cases which are neither fish nor fowl: 44 cases which are found

in Volume 15 (pages 350-end) and in Volume 16 (pages 1-290), but not, therefore, in the last six volumes, and

which were decided after the original work was completed (that is, through Volume 15 to page 349), but are not

otherwise indexed above. Though listed in the consolidated table of cases printed in Volume 16, those cases are

listed below to overcome the objection that it should be possible to find them in this Appendix just as it is

possible herein to find all of those cases which appear in the last six volumes but which are not otherwise

indexed herein.

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-164- June 2000

APPENDIX CASES SORTED ALPHABETICALLY

BY TOPIC AND CASE NAME

Abandonment

Palmer v. Moore U.K. New South Wales 1900 20 : 412

Stage v. Boyer Penna. 1898 19 : 210

Woodward v. Mitchell Ind. 1895 18 : 158

Account

Taylor v. Thomas Colo. 1903 22 : 527

Tecumseh Iron Co. v. Camp Alabama 1891 17 : 388

Agent

Calumet M. & M. Co. v. Phillips Colo. 1903 22 : 677

Appropriation

Cardoza v. Calkins Cal. 1897 18 : 689

Blasting

Belleville Stone Co. v. Mooney N.J. 1898 19 : 264

Berg v. Boston & Mont. Consol. Co. Mont. 1892 17 : 470

Boundaries

Ashman v. Wigton Penna. 1887 17 : 117

Broker

Leech v. Clemons Colo. App. 1899 20 : 186

Confusion

St. Clair v. Cash Gold M. & M. Co. Colo. App. 1896 18 : 523

Consideration

Coles v. Kennedy Iowa 1890 17 : 357

Contempt

Boston Co. v. Montana Ore P. Co. Mont. 1900 20 : 492

Contract

Anvil M. Co. v. Humble U.S. Mich. 1894 18 : 98

Caley v. Portland Colo. App. 1903 22 : 595

Kimberley W. Co. v. DeBeers Co. U.K. Cape Pr. 1897 19 : 62

McIntyre v. Ajax M. Co. Utah 1899 20 : 142

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-165- June 2000

Conveyance

King v. New York & Cleveland Co. Penna. 1903 22 : 515

Lehigh Z. Co. v. New Jersey Z. Co. N.J. 1893 17 : 600

Paine v. Griffiths 3rd Cir. Penna. 1898 19 : 297

Corporation(s)

Glengary Consol. M. Co. v. Boehmer Colo. 1900 21 : 74

Pittsburg M. Co. v. Spooner Wisc. 1889 17 : 226

Covenant

Crawford v. Witherbee Wisc. 1890 17 : 348

Custom

Jones v. Holden Mass. 1903 22 : 523

Ditch

Smith v. Hawkins Cal. 1898 19 : 243

Welch v. Garrett Idaho 1897 19 : 193

Drainage

Ulmer v. Farnsworth Me. 1888 17 : 134

Dump

Boileau v. Heath U.K. 1898 19 : 349

Scheel v. Alhambra M. Co. C.C.D. Nev. 1897 18 : 616

Eminent Domain

Byrnes v. Douglass 9th Cir. Nev. 1897 19 : 96

Manufacturers’ N. Gas Co. v. Leslie Ind. App. 1898 19 : 566

Escrow

Rubie C. Co. v. Princess Alice Co. Colo. 1903 22 : 569

Estoppel

Bunker Hill M. Co. v. Pascoe Utah 1901 21 : 626

Evidence

Hines v. Miller (Reader v. Miller) Cal. 1898 19 : 609

Exhausted Mine

Blake v. Lobb’s Estate Mich. 1896 18 : 462

Brooks v. Cook Alabama 1902 22 : 456

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-166- June 2000

Diamond Iron Co. v. Buckeye I. Co. Minn. 1897 19 : 197

Fritzler v. Robinson Iowa 1886 17 : 105

Hewitt Iron M. Co. v. Dessau Co. Mich. 1902 22 : 111

Expert

Douthett v. Fort Pitt Gas Co. Penna. 1902 22 : 204

Fixtures

Cook v. Enright Cal. 1901 21 : 496

Couch v. Welsh Utah 1901 21 : 619

Updegraff v. Lesem Colo. App. 1900 20 : 620

Flooding

Ezzard v. Findley Gold M. Co. Ga. 1885 17 : 40

Forfeiture

Bartley v. Phillips Penna. 1895 18 : 145

Bartley v. Phillips Penna. 1897 18 : 542

Edwards v. Iola Gas Co. Kansas 1902 22 : 293

Gadbury v. Ohio & Indiana C. Co. Ind. 1903 22 : 680

Joseph v. Davenport Iowa 1902 22 : 171

Lynch v. Versailles Fuel Gas Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 149

Marshall v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1901 21 : 179

Ray v. Western Penn. N. Gas Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 374

Shellar v. Shivers Penna. 1895 18 : 260

South Penn Oil Co. v. Edgell W. Va. 1900 21 : 106

Fraud

Clark v. Buffalo Hump M. Co. 9th Cir. Idaho 1903 22 : 672

Edelman v. Latshaw Penna. 1897 18 : 608

Hanley v. Sweeny 9th Cir. Idaho 1901 21 : 333

Lagarde v. Anniston Lime Co. Alabama 1900 20 : 545

Lawrence v. Gayetty Cal. 1889 17 : 169

Mudsill M. Co. v. Watrous 6th Cir. Mich. 1894 18 : 1

Sun Dance Gold M. Co. v. Frost Ariz. 1901 21 : 252

Synnott v. Shaughnessy U.S. Idaho 1889 17 : 213

Upton v. Weisling Ariz. 1903 22 : 601

Injunction

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey Colo. 1902 22 : 259

Armstrong v. Auen Penna. 1891 17 : 392

Copper King, Ltd. v. Wabash M. Co. C.C.S.D. Cal. 1902 22 : 164

Dimick v. Shaw 8th Cir. Colo. 1899 20 : 49

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-167- June 2000

Erskine v. Forest Oil Co. C.C.W.D. Penna. 1895 18 : 297

Harley v. Montana Ore P. Co. Mont. 1903 22 : 550

Indianapolis Co. v. Kibbey Ind. 1893 17 : 677

Lindsley v. Union Silver Star Co. Wash. 1901 21 : 586

McCann v. Wallace C.C.D. Oregon 1902 22 : 389

Silver Peak Mines v. Hanchett C.C.D. Nev. 1899 20 : 19

Stahl v. Van Vleck Ohio 1895 18 : 231

Williams v. Long Cal. 1900 20 : 738

Inspection

Henszey v. Langdon-Henszey Coal Co. C.C.E.D. N.C. 1897 18 : 614

People ex rel. Calumet v. DeFrance Colo. 1902 22 : 61

State ex rel. Geyman v. Dist. Court Mont. 1902 22 : 211

Instroke

Potter v. Rend Penna. 1902 22 : 1

Madison v. Garfield Coal Co. Iowa 1901 21 : 358

Webber v. Vogel Penna. 1899 19 : 639

Laches

Curtis v. Lakin 8th Cir. Utah 1899 20 : 35

Johnson v. Standard M. Co. U.S. Colo. 1893 17 : 554

Lease

Ahrns v. Chartiers Valley Oil Co. Penna. 1898 19 : 584

Aye v. Philadelphia Co.(1)

Penna. 1899 20 : 177

Aye v. Philadelphia Co.(2)

Penna. 1899 20 : 182

Brooks v. Kunkle Ind. App. 1900 20 : 540

Chambers v. Smith Penna. 1897 19 : 146

Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Pryor Colo. 1898 19 : 544

Denniston v. Haddock Penna. 1901 21 : 513

Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Curless Ind. App. 1899 19 : 682

Double v. Union Heat & Light Co. Penna. 1896 18 : 327

Duffield v. Hue Penna. 1889 17 : 253

Eclipse Oil Co. v. South Penn Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 234

Edmonds v. Mounsey Ind. App. 1896 18 : 384

Fisher v. Guffey Penna. 1899 20 : 174

Gaines v. Virginia & Alabama Co. Alabama 1900 20 : 393

Glasgow v. Chartiers Oil Co. Penna. 1892 17 : 523

Henderson v. Ferrell Penna. 1898 19 : 205

Hooks v. Forst Penna. 1895 18 : 139

Jackson v. O’Hara Penna. 1897 19 : 153

Johnston v. Filer Penna. 1902 21 : 741

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-168- June 2000

Knotts v. McGregor W. Va. 1900 20 : 432

Leatherman v. Oliver Penna. 1892 17 : 526

Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey W. Va. 1903 22 : 545

Lowther O. Co. v. Miller-Sibley Co. W. Va. 1903 22 : 656

Mathews v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1897 18 : 552

Mickle v. Douglas Iowa 1888 17 : 137

Ober v. Schenck Utah 1901 21 : 460

Steiner v. Marks Penna. 1896 18 : 320

Stone v. Marshall Oil Co. Penna. 1898 19 : 593

Trees v. Eclipse Oil Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 260

Level

Cambers v. Lowry Mont. 1898 19 : 539

License

Fairchild v. Dunbar Furnace Co. Penna. 1889 17 : 242

Hosford v. Metcalf Iowa 1901 21 : 198

Lien

Beck v. O’Connor Mont. 1898 19 : 342

Butte Hardware Co. v. Frank Mont. 1901 21 : 368

Chappius v. Blankman Cal. 1900 20 : 461

Frowenfeld v. Hastings Cal. 1901 21 : 503

Married Women

Kunkle v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 153

Master and Servant

Mather v. Rillston U.S. Mich. 1895 18 : 165

Uren v. Golden Tunnel M. Co. Wash. 1901 21 : 243

Measure of Damages

Gerkins v. Kentucky Salt Co. Ky. Ct. App. 1902 22 : 189

Keppel v. Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. Penna. 1901 21 : 605

Kincaid v. Price Colo. App. 1902 22 : 382

Mechanics’ Liens

Hendrie & B. Co. v. Holy Cross Co. Colo. App. 1902 22 : 179

Holter Hardware Co. v. Ontario Co. Mont. 1900 20 : 518

Merger

Wade v. South Penn Oil Co. W. Va. 1898 19 : 605

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-169- June 2000

Mineral Lands

Johnson v. California Lustral Co. Cal. 1899 20 : 314

Mineral(s)

Armstrong v. Lake Champlain Co. N.Y. 1895 18 : 279

Burns v. Clark Cal. 1901 21 : 489

Great Western Ry. Co. v. Blades U.K. S. Staffs. 1901 21 : 425

Phelps v. Church of Our Lady 3rd Cir. D.N.J. 1902 22 : 233

Mortgage

G.V.B. Mining Co. v. First N. Bank 9th Cir. Idaho 1899 20 : 66

Natural Gas

Burton v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1903 22 : 507

Iams v. Carnegie Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 335

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 20 : 672

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 21 : 102

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 21 : 139

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1901 21 : 194

McKnight v. Manufacturers’ Co. Penna. 1892 17 : 429

Ohio Oil Co. v. State of Indiana U.S. Ind. 1900 20 : 466

Peoples Gas Co. v. Tyner Ind. 1892 17 : 481

State v. Moore Ind. App. 1901 21 : 401

Negligence

Asbestos & Asbestic Co. v. Durand Canada L. Can. 1900 20 : 452

Deserant v. Cerillos Coal R.R. Co. U.S. N. Mex. 1900 20 : 573

Gowen v. Bush 8th Cir. In.T. 1896 18 : 433

New York M. Syndicate v. Rogers Colo. 1888 17 : 123

Portland Gold M. Co. v. Flaherty 8th Cir. Colo. 1901 21 : 555

Sampson M. & M. Co. v. Schaad Colo. 1890 17 : 362

Union Gold M. Co. v. Crawford Colo. 1902 22 : 213

Nuisance

McGregor v. Camden W. Va. 1899 20 : 274

Strobel v Kerr Salt Co. N.Y. 1900 21 : 38

Oil

Balfour v. Russell Penna. 1895 18 : 202

Bettman v Harness W. Va. 1896 18 : 500

Calhoon v. Neely Penna. 1902 21 : 754

Cassell v. Crothers Penna. 1899 20 : 160

Colgan v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 338

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-170- June 2000

Galey Bros. v. Kellerman Penna. 1889 17 : 164

Harris v. Ohio Oil Co. Ohio 1897 19 : 157

Huggins v. Daley 4th Cir. W.Va. 1900 20 : 377

Indianapolis Gas Co. v. Teters Ind. App. 1896 18 : 391

Jones v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1900 20 : 350

Kelly v. Marshall Penna. 1896 18 : 317

Kleppner v. Lemon Penna. 1896 18 : 404

Kleppner v. Lemon Penna. 1901 21 : 275

Lawson v. Kirchner W. Va. 1901 21 : 683

Lynch v. Burford Penna. 1901 21 : 611

McClay v. Western Pennsylvania Co. Penna. 1902 21 : 760

McNish v. Stone Penna. 1879 17 : 22

Northwestern Ohio Gas Co. v. Ullery Ohio 1903 22 : 647

Parish Fork Co. v. Bridgewater Co. W. Va. 1902 22 : 145

Roberts v. Bettman W. Va. 1898 19 : 326

South Penn Oil Co. v. Latshaw 4th Cir. W.Va. 1901 21 : 600

Steelsmith v. Gartlan W. Va. 1898 19 : 315

Van Etten v. Kelly Ohio 1902 22 : 269

Venture Oil Co. v. Fretts Penna. 1893 17 : 543

Wagner v. Mallory N.Y. 1902 22 : 42

Wettengel v. Gormley Penna. 1894 18 : 93

Wettengel v. Gormley Penna. 1898 19 : 213

Williams v. Guffy Penna. 1896 18 : 478

Windfall Mfg. Co. v. Patterson Ind. 1897 18 : 674

Young v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 345

Option

National Oil & Pipe L. Co. v. Teel Texas 1902 22 : 263

Snow v. Nelson C.C.D. Nev. 1902 22 : 32

Ore

Finding v. Hartman Colo. 1890 17 : 333

Fox v. Mackay Cal. 1899 20 : 89

Silver V. Co. v. No. Carolina Co. N. Car. 1898 19 : 339

West v. Humphrey Nev. 1890 17 : 367

Parties

Donovan v. Campion 8th Cir. Colo. 1898 19 : 247

Partition

Haeussler v. Missouri Iron Co. Mo. 1892 17 : 458

Partnership

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-171- June 2000

Childers v. Neely W. Va. 1899 20 : 222

Markle v. Wilbur Penna. 1901 21 : 532

Trayes v. Johns Colo. App. 1898 19 : 304

Vietti v. Nesbitt Nev. 1895 18 : 247

Prospecting Contract

Cisna v. Mallory C.C.D. Wash. 1898 19 : 227

Raymond v. Johnson Wash. 1897 19 : 56

Rice v. Rigley Idaho 1900 20 : 553

Prospectus

Wiser v. Lawler U.S. Ariz. 1903 22 : 630

Quiet Title

Ramus v. Humphreys Cal. 1901 21 : 450

Receiver

Curran v. Campion (see Kelley v. Boettcher, below)

Kelley v. Boettcher C.C.D. Colo. 1898 19 : 515

Welch v. Renshaw Colo. App. 1900 20 : 399

Relation

Murray v. Tingley Mont. 1897 19 : 137

Rents and Royalties

Eclipse Oil Co. v. Garner W. Va. 1903 22 : 626

Lasier v. Appleton Land & Iron Co. Mich. 1902 22 : 229

Maloney v. Love Colo. App. 1898 19 : 310

Snodgrass v. South Penn Oil Co. W. Va. 1900 20 : 428

Wright v. Warrior Run Coal Co. Penna. 1897 19 : 102

Rescission

Barnard v. Roane Iron Co. Tenn. 1886 17 : 94

Crocker v. Manley Ill. 1896 18 : 485

Reservation

Harris v. Cobb W. Va. 1901 21 : 263

Johnstone v. Crompton & Co. U.K. 1900 20 : 649

Murray v. Allred Tenn. 1897 19 : 169

School Lands

Saunders v. La Purisima Gold M. Co. Cal. 1899 20 : 93

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-172- June 2000

Severance

Virginia Coal & Iron Co. v. Kelly Va. 1896 18 : 395

Specific Performance

Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co. 7th Cir. Ind. 1902 22 : 429

Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co. C.C.D. Ind. 1902 22 : 25

Hexter v. Pearce U.K. Devons. 1900 21 : 143

Oakford v. Hackley C.C.W.D. Penna. 1899 19 : 708

Prince v. Lamb Cal. 1900 20 : 419

Springs

Collins v. Chartiers Valley Gas Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 383

Statute of Frauds

Walker Bros. v. Bamberger Utah 1898 19 : 470

Statute of Limitations

Lewey v. H.C. Frick Coke Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 179

Stock

Kelly v. Clark Mont. 1898 19 : 431

Crowley v. Walton R.I. 1901 21 : 629

Strikes

Reinecke Coal M. Co. v. Wood C.C.W.D. Ky. 1901 21 : 708

Surface Support

Hall v. Duke of Norfolk U.K. 1900 20 : 636

Matulys v. Philadelphia & R. Co. Penna. 1902 21 : 745

Noonan v. Pardee Penna. 1901 21 : 517

Youghiogheny River Co. v. Hopkins Penna. 1901 21 : 188

Tailings

Otaheite Gold & Silver Co. v. Dean C.C.D. Nev. 1900 20 : 688

York v. Davidson Oregon 1901 21 : 452

Tax

Eureka Hill Co. v. City of Eureka Utah 1900 21 : 131

St. Mary’s Gas Co. v. County of Elk Penna. 1899 20 : 76

Tenant(s) for Life

Blakley v. Marshall Penna. 1896 18 : 350

Hook v. Garfield Coal Co. Iowa 1900 21 : 81

Koen v. Bartlett W. Va. 1895 18 : 289

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-173- June 2000

Marshall v. Mellon Penna. 1897 18 : 548

Tenant(s) in Common

Abbey v. Wheeler N.Y. 1902 22 : 86

Enterprise Co. v. National Tr. Co. Penna. 1896 18 : 312

Franklin M. Co. v. O’Brien Colo. 1896 18 : 331

Fulmer’s Appeal(F. v. Williams) Penna. 1889 17 : 246

People ex rel. Breene v. Dist. Ct. Colo. 1900 20 : 734

Trespass

Donovan v. Consolidated Coal Co. Ill. 1900 21 : 91

United Coal Co. v. Canon City Co. Colo. 1897 18 : 639

Trover

Hartford Iron M. Co. v. Cambria Co. Mich. 1892 17 : 515

National Transit Co. v. Weston Penna. 1888 17 : 143

Trust(s)

Costa v. Silva Cal. 1899 20 : 330

Geyser-Marion Gold M. Co. v. Stark 8th Cir. Utah 1901 21 : 220

Vendor and Purchaser

Bailey v. Bond 9th Cir. Wash. 1896 18 : 466

Carter v. Rhodes Cal. 1901 21 : 695

Griffin v. American Gold M. Co. 9th Cir. Alas. 1903 22 : 709

Hardwick v. McClurg Colo. App. 1901 21 : 412

McGowan v. Bailey Penna. 1892 17 : 425

Stephens v. Wood Oregon 1901 21 : 443

Wages

Cerrusite M. Co. v. Steele Colo. App. 1902 22 : 462

Waste

Williamson v. Jones W. Va. 1897 19 : 19

Water

Cardelli v. Comstock Tunnel Co. Nev. 1901 21 : 699

Fairplay Hydraulic M. Co. v. Weston Colo. 1901 21 : 725

Last Chance Co. v. Bunker Hill Co. C.C.D. Idaho 1892 17 : 449

Schwab v. Beam C.C.D. Colo. 1898 19 : 279

Way

Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 412

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-174- June 2000

McCracken v. Gumbert Penna. 1890 17 : 279

Reliance Coal Co. v. Kentucky Co. Tenn. 1893 17 : 609

Uhl v. Ohio River R.R. Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 263

Workings

Woodworth v. McLean Mo. 1889 17 : 194

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-175- June 2000

APPENDIX CASES SORTED BY NAME

Abbey v. Wheeler N.Y. 1902 22 : 86

Ahrns v. Chartiers Valley Oil Co. Penna. 1898 19 : 584

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey Colo. 1902 22 : 259

Anvil M. Co. v. Humble U.S. Mich. 1894 18 : 98

Armstrong v. Auen Penna. 1891 17 : 392

Armstrong v. Lake Champlain Co. N.Y. 1895 18 : 279

Asbestos & Asbestic Co. v. Durand Canada L. Can. 1900 20 : 452

Ashman v. Wigton Penna. 1887 17 : 117

Aye v. Philadelphia Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 177

Aye v. Philadelphia Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 182

Bailey v. Bond 9th Cir. Wash. 1896 18 : 466

Balfour v. Russell Penna. 1895 18 : 202

Barnard v. Roane Iron Co. Tenn. 1886 17 : 94

Bartley v. Phillips Penna. 1895 18 : 145

Bartley v. Phillips Penna. 1897 18 : 542

Beck v. O’Connor Mont. 1898 19 : 342

Belleville Stone Co. v. Mooney N.J. 1898 19 : 264

Berg v. Boston & Mont. Consol. Co. Mont. 1892 17 : 470

Bettman v Harness W. Va. 1896 18 : 500

Blake v. Lobb’s Estate Mich. 1896 18 : 462

Blakley v. Marshall Penna. 1896 18 : 350

Boileau v. Heath U.K. 1898 19 : 349

Boston Co. v. Montana Ore P. Co. Mont. 1900 20 : 492

Brooks v. Cook Alabama 1902 22 : 456

Brooks v. Kunkle Ind. App. 1900 20 : 540

Bunker Hill M. Co. v. Pascoe Utah 1901 21 : 626

Burns v. Clark Cal. 1901 21 : 489

Burton v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1903 22 : 507

Butte Hardware Co. v. Frank Mont. 1901 21 : 368

Byrnes v. Douglass 9th Cir. Nev. 1897 19 : 96

Caley v. Portland Colo. App. 1903 22 : 595

Calhoon v. Neely Penna. 1902 21 : 754

Calumet M. & M. Co. v. Phillips Colo. 1903 22 : 677

Cambers v. Lowry Mont. 1898 19 : 539

Cardelli v. Comstock Tunnel Co. Nev. 1901 21 : 699

Cardoza v. Calkins Cal. 1897 18 : 689

Carter v. Rhodes Cal. 1901 21 : 695

Cassell v. Crothers Penna. 1899 20 : 160

Cerrusite M. Co. v. Steele Colo. App. 1902 22 : 462

Chambers v. Smith Penna. 1897 19 : 146

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-176- June 2000

Chappius v. Blankman Cal. 1900 20 : 461

Childers v. Neely W. Va. 1899 20 : 222

Cisna v. Mallory C.C.D. Wash. 1898 19 : 227

Clark v. Buffalo Hump M. Co. 9th Cir. Idaho 1903 22 : 672

Coles v. Kennedy Iowa 1890 17 : 357

Colgan v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 338

Collins v. Chartiers Valley Gas Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 383

Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Pryor Colo. 1898 19 : 544

Cook v. Enright Cal. 1901 21 : 496

Copper King, Ltd. v. Wabash M. Co. C.C.S.D. Cal. 1902 22 : 164

Costa v. Silva Cal. 1899 20 : 330

Couch v. Welsh Utah 1901 21 : 619

Crawford v. Witherbee Wisc. 1890 17 : 348

Crocker v. Manley Ill. 1896 18 : 485

Crowley v. Walton R.I. 1901 21 : 629

Curran v. Campion (see Kelley v. Boettcher, below)

Curtis v. Lakin 8th Cir. Utah 1899 20 : 35

Denniston v. Haddock Penna. 1901 21 : 513

Deserant v. Cerillos Coal R.R. Co. U.S. N. Mex. 1900 20 : 573

Diamond Iron Co. v. Buckeye I. Co. Minn. 1897 19 : 197

Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Curless Ind. App. 1899 19 : 682

Dimick v. Shaw 8th Cir. Colo. 1899 20 : 49

Donovan v. Campion 8th Cir. Colo. 1898 19 : 247

Donovan v. Consolidated Coal Co. Ill. 1900 21 : 91

Double v. Union Heat & Light Co. Penna. 1896 18 : 327

Douthett v. Fort Pitt Gas Co. Penna. 1902 22 : 204

Duffield v. Hue Penna. 1889 17 : 253

Eclipse Oil Co. v. Garner W. Va. 1903 22 : 626

Eclipse Oil Co. v. South Penn Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 234

Edelman v. Latshaw Penna. 1897 18 : 608

Edmonds v. Mounsey Ind. App. 1896 18 : 384

Edwards v. Iola Gas Co. Kansas 1902 22 : 293

Enterprise Co. v. National Tr. Co. Penna. 1896 18 : 312

Erskine v. Forest Oil Co. C.C.W.D. Penna. 1895 18 : 297

Eureka Hill Co. v. City of Eureka Utah 1900 21 : 131

Ezzard v. Findley Gold M. Co. Ga. 1885 17 : 40

Fairchild v. Dunbar Furnace Co. Penna. 1889 17 : 242

Fairplay Hydraulic M. Co. v. Weston Colo. 1901 21 : 725

Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co. C.C.D. Ind. 1902 22 : 25

Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co. 7th Cir. Ind. 1902 22 : 429

Finding v. Hartman Colo. 1890 17 : 333

Fisher v. Guffey Penna. 1899 20 : 174

Fox v. Mackay Cal. 1899 20 : 89

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-177- June 2000

Franklin M. Co. v. O’Brien Colo. 1896 18 : 331

Fritzler v. Robinson Iowa 1886 17 : 105

Frowenfeld v. Hastings Cal. 1901 21 : 503

Fulmer’s Appeal (F. v. Williams) Penna. 1889 17 : 246

G.V.B. Mining Co. v. First N. Bank 9th Cir. Idaho 1899 20 : 66

Gadbury v. Ohio & Indiana C. Co. Ind. 1903 22 : 680

Gaines v. Virginia & Alabama Co. Alabama 1900 20 : 393

Galey Bros. v. Kellerman Penna. 1889 17 : 164

Gerkins v. Kentucky Salt Co. Ky. Ct. App. 1902 22 : 189

Geyser-Marion Gold M. Co. v. Stark 8th Cir. Utah 1901 21 : 220

Glasgow v. Chartiers Oil Co. Penna. 1892 17 : 523

Glengary Consol. M. Co. v. Boehmer Colo. 1900 21 : 74

Gowen v. Bush 8th Cir. In.T. 1896 18 : 433

Great Western Ry. Co. v. Blades U.K. S. Staffs. 1901 21 : 425

Griffin v. American Gold M. Co. 9th Cir. Alas. 1903 22 : 709

Haeussler v. Missouri Iron Co. Mo. 1892 17 : 458

Hall v. Duke of Norfolk U.K. 1900 20 : 636

Hanley v. Sweeny 9th Cir. Idaho 1901 21 : 333

Hardwick v. McClurg Colo. App. 1901 21 : 412

Harley v. Montana Ore P. Co. Mont. 1903 22 : 550

Harris v. Cobb W. Va. 1901 21 : 263

Harris v. Ohio Oil Co. Ohio 1897 19 : 157

Hartford Iron M. Co. v. Cambria Co. Mich. 1892 17 : 515

Henderson v. Ferrell Penna. 1898 19 : 205

Hendrie & B. Co. v. Holy Cross Co. Colo. App. 1902 22 : 179

Henszey v. Langdon-Henszey Coal Co. C.C.E.D. N.C. 1897 18 : 614

Hewitt Iron M. Co. v. Dessau Co. Mich. 1902 22 : 111

Hexter v. Pearce U.K. Devons. 1900 21 : 143

Hines v. Miller (Reader v. Miller) Cal. 1898 19 : 609

Holter Hardware Co. v. Ontario Co. Mont. 1900 20 : 518

Hook v. Garfield Coal Co. Iowa 1900 21 : 81

Hooks v. Forst Penna. 1895 18 : 139

Hosford v. Metcalf Iowa 1901 21 : 198

Huggins v. Daley 4th Cir. W.Va. 1900 20 : 377

Iams v. Carnegie Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 335

Indianapolis Co. v. Kibbey Ind. 1893 17 : 677

Indianapolis Gas Co. v. Teters Ind. App. 1896 18 : 391

Jackson v. O’Hara Penna. 1897 19 : 153

Johnson v. California Lustral Co. Cal. 1899 20 : 314

Johnson v. Standard M. Co. U.S. Colo. 1893 17 : 554

Johnston v. Filer Penna. 1902 21 : 741

Johnstone v. Crompton & Co. U.K. 1900 20 : 649

Jones v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1900 20 : 350

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-178- June 2000

Jones v. Holden Mass. 1903 22 : 523

Joseph v. Davenport Iowa 1902 22 : 171

Kelley v. Boettcher C.C.D. Colo. 1898 19 : 515

Kelly v. Clark Mont. 1898 19 : 431

Kelly v. Marshall Penna. 1896 18 : 317

Keppel v. Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. Penna. 1901 21 : 605

Kimberley W. Co. v. DeBeers Co. U.K. Cape Pr. 1897 19 : 62

Kincaid v. Price Colo. App. 1902 22 : 382

King v. New York & Cleveland Co. Penna. 1903 22 : 515

Kleppner v. Lemon Penna. 1896 18 : 404

Kleppner v. Lemon Penna. 1901 21 : 275

Knotts v. McGregor W. Va. 1900 20 : 432

Koen v. Bartlett W. Va. 1895 18 : 289

Kunkle v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 153

Lagarde v. Anniston Lime Co. Alabama 1900 20 : 545

Lasier v. Appleton Land & Iron Co. Mich. 1902 22 : 229

Last Chance Co. v. Bunker Hill Co. C.C.D. Idaho 1892 17 : 449

Lawrence v. Gayetty Cal. 1889 17 : 169

Lawson v. Kirchner W. Va. 1901 21 : 683

Leatherman v. Oliver Penna. 1892 17 : 526

Leech v. Clemons Colo. App. 1899 20 : 186

Lehigh Z. Co. v. New Jersey Z. Co. N.J. 1893 17 : 600

Lewey v. H.C. Frick Coke Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 179

Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 412

Lindsley v. Union Silver Star Co. Wash. 1901 21 : 586

Lowther O. Co. v. Miller-Sibley Co. W. Va. 1903 22 : 656

Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey W. Va. 1903 22 : 545

Lynch v. Burford Penna. 1901 21 : 611

Lynch v. Versailles Fuel Gas Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 149

Madison v. Garfield Coal Co. Iowa 1901 21 : 358

Maloney v. Love Colo. App. 1898 19 : 310

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 20 : 672

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 21 : 102

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 21 : 139

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1901 21 : 194

Manufacturers’ N. Gas Co. v. Leslie Ind. App. 1898 19 : 566

Markle v. Wilbur Penna. 1901 21 : 532

Marshall v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1901 21 : 179

Marshall v. Mellon Penna. 1897 18 : 548

Mather v. Rillston U.S. Mich. 1895 18 : 165

Mathews v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1897 18 : 552

Matulys v. Philadelphia & R. Co. Penna. 1902 21 : 745

McCann v. Wallace C.C.D. Oregon 1902 22 : 389

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-179- June 2000

McClay v. Western Pennsylvania Co. Penna. 1902 21 : 760

McCracken v. Gumbert Penna. 1890 17 : 279

McGowan v. Bailey Penna. 1892 17 : 425

McGregor v. Camden W. Va. 1899 20 : 274

McIntyre v. Ajax M. Co. Utah 1899 20 : 142

McKnight v. Manufacturers’ Co. Penna. 1892 17 : 429

McNish v. Stone Penna. 1879 17 : 22

Mickle v. Douglas Iowa 1888 17 : 137

Mudsill M. Co. v. Watrous 6th Cir. Mich. 1894 18 : 1

Murray v. Allred Tenn. 1897 19 : 169

Murray v. Tingley Mont. 1897 19 : 137

National Oil & Pipe L. Co. v. Teel Texas 1902 22 : 263

National Transit Co. v. Weston Penna. 1888 17 : 143

New York M. Syndicate v. Rogers Colo. 1888 17 : 123

Noonan v. Pardee Penna. 1901 21 : 517

Northwestern Ohio Gas Co. v. Ullery Ohio 1903 22 : 647

Oakford v. Hackley C.C.W.D. Penna. 1899 19 : 708

Ober v. Schenck Utah 1901 21 : 460

Ohio Oil Co. v. State of Indiana U.S. Ind. 1900 20 : 466

Otaheite Gold & Silver Co. v. Dean C.C.D. Nev. 1900 20 : 688

Paine v. Griffiths 3rd Cir. Penna. 1898 19 : 297

Palmer v. Moore U.K. New S. Wales 1900 20 : 412

Parish Fork Co. v. Bridgewater Co. W. Va. 1902 22 : 145

People ex rel. Breene v. Dist. Ct. Colo. 1900 20 : 734

People ex rel. Calumet v. DeFrance Colo. 1902 22 : 61

Peoples Gas Co. v. Tyner Ind. 1892 17 : 481

Phelps v. Church of Our Lady 3rd Cir. D.N.J. 1902 22 : 233

Pittsburg M. Co. v. Spooner Wisc. 1889 17 : 226

Portland Gold M. Co. v. Flaherty 8th Cir. Colo. 1901 21 : 555

Potter v. Rend Penna. 1902 22 : 1

Prince v. Lamb Cal. 1900 20 : 419

Ramus v. Humphreys Cal. 1901 21 : 450

Ray v. Western Penn. N. Gas Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 374

Raymond v. Johnson Wash. 1897 19 : 56

Reinecke Coal M. Co. v. Wood C.C.W.D. Ky. 1901 21 : 708

Reliance Coal Co. v. Kentucky Co. Tenn. 1893 17 : 609

Rice v. Rigley Idaho 1900 20 : 553

Roberts v. Bettman W. Va. 1898 19 : 326

Rubie C. Co. v. Princess Alice Co. Colo. 1903 22 : 569

Sampson M. & M. Co. v. Schaad Colo. 1890 17 : 362

Saunders v. La Purisima Gold M. Co. Cal. 1899 20 : 93

Scheel v. Alhambra M. Co. C.C.D. Nev. 1897 18 : 616

Schwab v. Beam C.C.D. Colo. 1898 19 : 279

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-180- June 2000

Shellar v. Shivers Penna. 1895 18 : 260

Silver Peak Mines v. Hanchett C.C.D. Nev. 1899 20 : 19

Silver V. Co. v. No. Carolina Co. N. Car. 1898 19 : 339

Smith v. Hawkins Cal. 1898 19 : 243

Snodgrass v. South Penn Oil Co. W. Va. 1900 20 : 428

Snow v. Nelson C.C.D. Nev. 1902 22 : 32

South Penn Oil Co. v. Edgell W. Va. 1900 21 : 106

South Penn Oil Co. v. Latshaw 4th Cir. W.Va. 1901 21 : 600

St. Clair v. Cash Gold M. & M. Co. Colo. App. 1896 18 : 523

St. Mary’s Gas Co. v. County of Elk Penna. 1899 20 : 76

Stage v. Boyer Penna. 1898 19 : 210

Stahl v. Van Vleck Ohio 1895 18 : 231

State ex rel. Geyman v. Dist. Court Mont. 1902 22 : 211

State v. Moore Ind. App. 1901 21 : 401

Steelsmith v. Gartlan W. Va. 1898 19 : 315

Steiner v. Marks Penna. 1896 18 : 320

Stephens v. Wood Oregon 1901 21 : 443

Stone v. Marshall Oil Co. Penna. 1898 19 : 593

Strobel v Kerr Salt Co. N.Y. 1900 21 : 38

Sun Dance Gold M. Co. v. Frost Ariz. 1901 21 : 252

Synnott v. Shaughnessy U.S. Idaho 1889 17 : 213

Taylor v. Thomas Colo. 1903 22 : 527

Tecumseh Iron Co. v. Camp Alabama 1891 17 : 388

Trayes v. Johns Colo. App. 1898 19 : 304

Trees v. Eclipse Oil Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 260

Uhl v. Ohio River R.R. Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 263

Ulmer v. Farnsworth Me. 1888 17 : 134

Union Gold M. Co. v. Crawford Colo. 1902 22 : 213

United Coal Co. v. Canon City Co. Colo. 1897 18 : 639

Updegraff v. Lesem Colo. App. 1900 20 : 620

Upton v. Weisling Ariz. 1903 22 : 601

Uren v. Golden Tunnel M. Co. Wash. 1901 21 : 243

Van Etten v. Kelly Ohio 1902 22 : 269

Venture Oil Co. v. Fretts Penna. 1893 17 : 543

Vietti v. Nesbitt Nev. 1895 18 : 247

Virginia Coal & Iron Co. v. Kelly Va. 1896 18 : 395

Wade v. South Penn Oil Co. W. Va. 1898 19 : 605

Wagner v. Mallory N.Y. 1902 22 : 42

Walker Bros. v. Bamberger Utah 1898 19 : 470

Webber v. Vogel Penna. 1899 19 : 639

Welch v. Garrett Idaho 1897 19 : 193

Welch v. Renshaw Colo. App. 1900 20 : 399

West v. Humphrey Nev. 1890 17 : 367

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-181- June 2000

Wettengel v. Gormley Penna. 1894 18 : 93

Wettengel v. Gormley Penna. 1898 19 : 213

Williams v. Guffy Penna. 1896 18 : 478

Williams v. Long Cal. 1900 20 : 738

Williamson v. Jones W. Va. 1897 19 : 19

Windfall Mfg. Co. v. Patterson Ind. 1897 18 : 674

Wiser v. Lawler U.S. Ariz. 1903 22 : 630

Woodward v. Mitchell Ind. 1895 18 : 158

Woodworth v. McLean Mo. 1889 17 : 194

Wright v. Warrior Run Coal Co. Penna. 1897 19 : 102

York v. Davidson Oregon 1901 21 : 452

Youghiogheny River Co. v. Hopkins Penna. 1901 21 : 188

Young v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 345

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-182- June 2000

APPENDIX CASES SORTED BY JURISDICTION

Federal Court Cases

Synnott v. Shaughnessy U.S. Idaho 1889 17 : 213

Johnson v. Standard M. Co. U.S. Colo. 1893 17 : 554

Anvil M. Co. v. Humble U.S. Mich. 1894 18 : 98

Mather v. Rillston U.S. Mich. 1895 18 : 165

Ohio Oil Co. v. State of Indiana U.S. Ind. 1900 20 : 466

Deserant v. Cerillos Coal R.R. Co. U.S. N. Mex. 1900 20 : 573

Wiser v. Lawler U.S. Ariz. 1903 22 : 630

Paine v. Griffiths 3rd Cir. Penna. 1898 19 : 297

Phelps v. Church of Our Lady 3rd Cir. D.N.J. 1902 22 : 233

Huggins v. Daley 4th Cir. W.Va. 1900 20 : 377

South Penn Oil Co. v. Latshaw 4th Cir. W.Va. 1901 21 : 600

Mudsill M. Co. v. Watrous 6th Cir. Mich. 1894 18 : 1

Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co. 7th Cir. Ind. 1902 22 : 429

Donovan v. Campion 8th Cir. Colo. 1898 19 : 247

Dimick v. Shaw 8th Cir. Colo. 1899 20 : 49

Gowen v. Bush 8th Cir. In.T. 1896 18 : 433

Curtis v. Lakin 8th Cir. Utah 1899 20 : 35

Geyser-Marion Gold M. Co. v. Stark 8th Cir. Utah 1901 21 : 220

Portland Gold M. Co. v. Flaherty 8th Cir. Colo. 1901 21 : 555

Bailey v. Bond 9th Cir. Wash. 1896 18 : 466

Byrnes v. Douglass 9th Cir. Nev. 1897 19 : 96

G.V.B. Mining Co. v. First N. Bank 9th Cir. Idaho 1899 20 : 66

Hanley v. Sweeny 9th Cir. Idaho 1901 21 : 333

Clark v. Buffalo Hump M. Co. 9th Cir. Idaho 1903 22 : 672

Griffin v. American Gold M. Co. 9th Cir. Alas. 1903 22 : 709

Copper King, Ltd. v. Wabash M. Co. C.C.S.D. Cal. 1902 22 : 164

Schwab v. Beam C.C.D. Colo. 1898 19 : 279

Kelley v. Boettcher C.C.D. Colo. 1898 19 : 515

Last Chance Co. v. Bunker Hill Co. C.C.D. Idaho 1892 17 : 449

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-183- June 2000

Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co. C.C.D. Ind. 1902 22 : 25

Reinecke Coal M. Co. v. Wood C.C.W.D. Ky. 1901 21 : 708

Scheel v. Alhambra M. Co. C.C.D. Nev. 1897 18 : 616

Silver Peak Mines v. Hanchett C.C.D. Nev. 1899 20 : 19

Otaheite Gold & Silver Co. v. Dean C.C.D. Nev. 1900 20 : 688

Snow v. Nelson C.C.D. Nev. 1902 22 : 32

Henszey v. Langdon-Henszey Coal Co. C.C.E.D. N.C. 1897 18 : 614

McCann v. Wallace C.C.D. Oregon 1902 22 : 389

Erskine v. Forest Oil Co. C.C.W.D. Penna. 1895 18 : 297

Oakford v. Hackley C.C.W.D. Penna. 1899 19 : 708

Cisna v. Mallory C.C.D. Wash. 1898 19 : 227

State and Territorial Court Cases

Tecumseh Iron Co. v. Camp Alabama 1891 17 : 388

Gaines v. Virginia & Alabama Co. Alabama 1900 20 : 393

Lagarde v. Anniston Lime Co. Alabama 1900 20 : 545

Brooks v. Cook Alabama 1902 22 : 456

Sun Dance Gold M. Co. v. Frost Ariz. 1901 21 : 252

Upton v. Weisling Ariz. 1903 22 : 601

Lawrence v. Gayetty Cal. 1889 17 : 169

Cardoza v. Calkins Cal. 1897 18 : 689

Hines v. Miller(Reader v. Miller) Cal. 1898 19 : 609

Smith v. Hawkins Cal. 1898 19 : 243

Costa v. Silva Cal. 1899 20 : 330

Fox v. Mackay Cal. 1899 20 : 89

Johnson v. California Lustral Co. Cal. 1899 20 : 314

Saunders v. La Purisima Gold M. Co. Cal. 1899 20 : 93

Chappius v. Blankman Cal. 1900 20 : 461

Prince v. Lamb Cal. 1900 20 : 419

Williams v. Long Cal. 1900 20 : 738

Carter v. Rhodes Cal. 1901 21 : 695

Burns v. Clark Cal. 1901 21 : 489

Frowenfeld v. Hastings Cal. 1901 21 : 503

Cook v. Enright Cal. 1901 21 : 496

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-184- June 2000

Ramus v. Humphreys Cal. 1901 21 : 450

New York M. Syndicate v. Rogers Colo. 1888 17 : 123

Finding v. Hartman Colo. 1890 17 : 333

Sampson M. & M. Co. v. Schaad Colo. 1890 17 : 362

Franklin M. Co. v. O’Brien Colo. 1896 18 : 331

United Coal Co. v. Canon City Co. Colo. 1897 18 : 639

Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Pryor Colo. 1898 19 : 544

People ex rel. Breene v. Dist. Ct. Colo. 1900 20 : 734

Glengary Consol. M. Co. v. Boehmer Colo. 1900 21 : 74

Fairplay Hydraulic M. Co. v. Weston Colo. 1901 21 : 725

People ex rel. Calumet v. DeFrance Colo. 1902 22 : 61

Union Gold M. Co. v. Crawford Colo. 1902 22 : 213

Ajax Gold M. Co. v. Hilkey Colo. 1902 22 : 259

Taylor v. Thomas Colo. 1903 22 : 527

Rubie C. Co. v. Princess Alice Co. Colo. 1903 22 : 569

Calumet M. & M. Co. v. Phillips Colo. 1903 22 : 677

St. Clair v. Cash Gold M. & M. Co. Colo. App. 1896 18 : 523

Trayes v. Johns Colo. App. 1898 19 : 304

Maloney v. Love Colo. App. 1898 19 : 310

Leech v. Clemons Colo. App. 1899 20 : 186

Welch v. Renshaw Colo. App. 1900 20 : 399

Updegraff v. Lesem Colo. App. 1900 20 : 620

Hardwick v. McClurg Colo. App. 1901 21 : 412

Hendrie & B. Co. v. Holy Cross Co. Colo. App. 1902 22 : 179

Kincaid v. Price Colo. App. 1902 22 : 382

Cerrusite M. Co. v. Steele Colo. App. 1902 22 : 462

Caley v. Portland Colo. App. 1903 22 : 595

Ezzard v. Findley Gold M. Co. Ga. 1885 17 : 40

Welch v. Garrett Idaho 1897 19 : 193

Rice v. Rigley Idaho 1900 20 : 553

Crocker v. Manley Ill. 1896 18 : 485

Donovan v. Consolidated Coal Co. Ill. 1900 21 : 91

Peoples Gas Co. v. Tyner Ind. 1892 17 : 481

Indianapolis Co. v. Kibbey Ind. 1893 17 : 677

Woodward v. Mitchell Ind. 1895 18 : 158

Windfall Mfg. Co. v. Patterson Ind. 1897 18 : 674

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 20 : 672

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-185- June 2000

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 21 : 102

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1900 21 : 139

Manufacturers’ Co. v. Indiana Co. Ind. 1901 21 : 194

Gadbury v. Ohio & Indiana C. Co. Ind. 1903 22 : 680

Edmonds v. Mounsey Ind. App. 1896 18 : 384

Indianapolis Gas Co. v. Teters Ind. App. 1896 18 : 391

Manufacturers’ N. Gas Co. v. Leslie Ind. App. 1898 19 : 566

Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Curless Ind. App. 1899 19 : 682

Brooks v. Kunkle Ind. App. 1900 20 : 540

State v. Moore Ind. App. 1901 21 : 401

Fritzler v. Robinson Iowa 1886 17 : 105

Mickle v. Douglas Iowa 1888 17 : 137

Coles v. Kennedy Iowa 1890 17 : 357

Hook v. Garfield Coal Co. Iowa 1900 21 : 81

Hosford v. Metcalf Iowa 1901 21 : 198

Madison v. Garfield Coal Co. Iowa 1901 21 : 358

Joseph v. Davenport Iowa 1902 22 : 171

Edwards v. Iola Gas Co. Kansas 1902 22 : 293

Gerkins v. Kentucky Salt Co. Ky. Ct. App. 1902 22 : 189

Jones v. Holden Mass. 1903 22 : 523

Ulmer v. Farnsworth Me. 1888 17 : 134

Hartford Iron M. Co. v. Cambria Co. Mich. 1892 17 : 515

Blake v. Lobb’s Estate Mich. 1896 18 : 462

Hewitt Iron M. Co. v. Dessau Co. Mich. 1902 22 : 111

Lasier v. Appleton Land & Iron Co. Mich. 1902 22 : 229

Diamond Iron Co. v. Buckeye I. Co. Minn. 1897 19 : 197

Woodworth v. McLean Mo. 1889 17 : 194

Haeussler v. Missouri Iron Co. Mo. 1892 17 : 458

Berg v. Boston & Mont. Consol. Co. Mont. 1892 17 : 470

Murray v. Tingley Mont. 1897 19 : 137

Beck v. O’Connor Mont. 1898 19 : 342

Kelly v. Clark Mont. 1898 19 : 431

Cambers v. Lowry Mont. 1898 19 : 539

Boston Co. v. Montana Ore P. Co. Mont. 1900 20 : 492

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-186- June 2000

Holter Hardware Co. v. Ontario Co. Mont. 1900 20 : 518

Butte Hardware Co. v. Frank Mont. 1901 21 : 368

State ex rel. Geyman v. Dist. Court Mont. 1902 22 : 211

Harley v. Montana Ore P. Co. Mont. 1903 22 : 550

Silver V. Co. v. No. Carolina Co. N. Car. 1898 19 : 339

Lehigh Z. Co. v. New Jersey Z. Co. N.J. 1893 17 : 600

Belleville Stone Co. v. Mooney N.J. 1898 19 : 264

Armstrong v. Lake Champlain Co. N.Y. 1895 18 : 279

Strobel v Kerr Salt Co. N.Y. 1900 21 : 38

Wagner v. Mallory N.Y. 1902 22 : 42

Abbey v. Wheeler N.Y. 1902 22 : 86

West v. Humphrey Nev. 1890 17 : 367

Vietti v. Nesbitt Nev. 1895 18 : 247

Cardelli v. Comstock Tunnel Co. Nev. 1901 21 : 699

Stahl v. Van Vleck Ohio 1895 18 : 231

Harris v. Ohio Oil Co. Ohio 1897 19 : 157

Van Etten v. Kelly Ohio 1902 22 : 269

Northwestern Ohio Gas Co. v. Ullery Ohio 1903 22 : 647

Stephens v. Wood Oregon 1901 21 : 443

York v. Davidson Oregon 1901 21 : 452

McNish v. Stone Penna. 1879 17 : 22

Ashman v. Wigton Penna. 1887 17 : 117

National Transit Co. v. Weston Penna. 1888 17 : 143

Galey Bros. v. Kellerman Penna. 1889 17 : 164

Fairchild v. Dunbar Furnace Co. Penna. 1889 17 : 242

Fulmer’s Appeal(F. v. Williams) Penna. 1889 17 : 246

Duffield v. Hue Penna. 1889 17 : 253

McCracken v. Gumbert Penna. 1890 17 : 279

Ray v. Western Penn. N. Gas Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 374

Collins v. Chartiers Valley Gas Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 383

Armstrong v. Auen Penna. 1891 17 : 392

Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co. Penna. 1891 17 : 412

McGowan v. Bailey Penna. 1892 17 : 425

McKnight v. Manufacturers’ Co. Penna. 1892 17 : 429

Glasgow v. Chartiers Oil Co. Penna. 1892 17 : 523

Leatherman v. Oliver Penna. 1892 17 : 526

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-187- June 2000

Venture Oil Co. v. Fretts Penna. 1893 17 : 543

Wettengel v. Gormley Penna. 1894 18 : 93

Hooks v. Forst Penna. 1895 18 : 139

Bartley v. Phillips Penna. 1895 18 : 145

Lynch v. Versailles Fuel Gas Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 149

Kunkle v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 153

Lewey v. H.C. Frick Coke Co. Penna. 1895 18 : 179

Balfour v. Russell Penna. 1895 18 : 202

Shellar v. Shivers Penna. 1895 18 : 260

Enterprise Co. v. National Tr. Co. Penna. 1896 18 : 312

Kelly v. Marshall Penna. 1896 18 : 317

Steiner v. Marks Penna. 1896 18 : 320

Double v. Union Heat & Light Co. Penna. 1896 18 : 327

Blakley v. Marshall Penna. 1896 18 : 350

Kleppner v. Lemon Penna. 1896 18 : 404

Williams v. Guffy Penna. 1896 18 : 478

Bartley v. Phillips Penna. 1897 18 : 542

Marshall v. Mellon Penna. 1897 18 : 548

Mathews v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1897 18 : 552

Edelman v. Latshaw Penna. 1897 18 : 608

Wright v. Warrior Run Coal Co. Penna. 1897 19 : 102

Chambers v. Smith Penna. 1897 19 : 146

Jackson v. O’Hara Penna. 1897 19 : 153

Henderson v. Ferrell Penna. 1898 19 : 205

Stage v. Boyer Penna. 1898 19 : 210

Wettengel v. Gormley Penna. 1898 19 : 213

Ahrns v. Chartiers Valley Oil Co. Penna. 1898 19 : 584

Stone v. Marshall Oil Co. Penna. 1898 19 : 593

Webber v. Vogel Penna. 1899 19 : 639

St. Mary’s Gas Co. v. County of Elk Penna. 1899 20 : 76

Cassell v. Crothers Penna. 1899 20 : 160

Fisher v. Guffey Penna. 1899 20 : 174

Aye v. Philadelphia Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 177

Aye v. Philadelphia Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 182

Iams v. Carnegie Natural Gas Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 335

Colgan v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 338

Young v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1899 20 : 345

Jones v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1900 20 : 350

Marshall v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1901 21 : 179

Youghiogheny River Co. v. Hopkins Penna. 1901 21 : 188

Kleppner v. Lemon Penna. 1901 21 : 275

Denniston v. Haddock Penna. 1901 21 : 513

Noonan v. Pardee Penna. 1901 21 : 517

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-188- June 2000

Markle v. Wilbur Penna. 1901 21 : 532

Keppel v. Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. Penna. 1901 21 : 605

Lynch v. Burford Penna. 1901 21 : 611

Johnston v. Filer Penna. 1902 21 : 741

Matulys v. Philadelphia & R. Co. Penna. 1902 21 : 745

Calhoon v. Neely Penna. 1902 21 : 754

McClay v. Western Pennsylvania Co. Penna. 1902 21 : 760

Potter v. Rend Penna. 1902 22 : 1

Douthett v. Fort Pitt Gas Co. Penna. 1902 22 : 204

Burton v. Forest Oil Co. Penna. 1903 22 : 507

King v. New York & Cleveland Co. Penna. 1903 22 : 515

Crowley v. Walton R.I. 1901 21 : 629

Barnard v. Roane Iron Co. Tenn. 1886 17 : 94

Reliance Coal Co. v. Kentucky Co. Tenn. 1893 17 : 609

Murray v. Allred Tenn. 1897 19 : 169

National Oil & Pipe L. Co. v. Teel Texas 1902 22 : 263

Walker Bros. v. Bamberger Utah 1898 19 : 470

McIntyre v. Ajax M. Co. Utah 1899 20 : 142

Eureka Hill Co. v. City of Eureka Utah 1900 21 : 131

Ober v. Schenck Utah 1901 21 : 460

Couch v. Welsh Utah 1901 21 : 619

Bunker Hill M. Co. v. Pascoe Utah 1901 21 : 626

Virginia Coal & Iron Co. v. Kelly Va. 1896 18 : 395

Koen v. Bartlett W. Va. 1895 18 : 289

Bettman v Harness W. Va. 1896 18 : 500

Williamson v. Jones W. Va. 1897 19 : 19

Steelsmith v. Gartlan W. Va. 1898 19 : 315

Roberts v. Bettman W. Va. 1898 19 : 326

Wade v. South Penn Oil Co. W. Va. 1898 19 : 605

Childers v. Neely W. Va. 1899 20 : 222

Eclipse Oil Co. v. South Penn Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 234

Trees v. Eclipse Oil Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 260

Uhl v. Ohio River R.R. Co. W. Va. 1899 20 : 263

McGregor v. Camden W. Va. 1899 20 : 274

Snodgrass v. South Penn Oil Co. W. Va. 1900 20 : 428

Knotts v. McGregor W. Va. 1900 20 : 432

South Penn Oil Co. v. Edgell W. Va. 1900 21 : 106

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-189- June 2000

Harris v. Cobb W. Va. 1901 21 : 263

Lawson v. Kirchner W. Va. 1901 21 : 683

Parish Fork Co. v. Bridgewater Co. W. Va. 1902 22 : 145

Lowther Oil Co. v. Guffey W. Va. 1903 22 : 545

Eclipse Oil Co. v. Garner W. Va. 1903 22 : 626

Lowther O. Co. v. Miller-Sibley Co. W. Va. 1903 22 : 656

Raymond v. Johnson Wash. 1897 19 : 56

Uren v. Golden Tunnel M. Co. Wash. 1901 21 : 243

Lindsley v. Union Silver Star Co. Wash. 1901 21 : 586

Pittsburg M. Co. v. Spooner Wisc. 1889 17 : 226

Crawford v. Witherbee Wisc. 1890 17 : 348

British and Canadian Cases

Asbestos & Asbestic Co. v. Durand Canada Lower Canada 1900 20 : 452

Kimberley W. Co. v. DeBeers Co. U.K. Cape Pr. 1897 19 : 62

Boileau v. Heath U.K. 1898 19 : 349

Palmer v. Moore U.K. New South Wales 1900 20 : 412

Hall v. Duke of Norfolk U.K. 1900 20 : 636

Johnstone v. Crompton & Co. U.K. 1900 20 : 649

Hexter v. Pearce U.K. Devons 1900 21 : 143

Great Western Ry. Co. v. Blades U.K. S. Staffs 1901 21 : 425

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-190- June 2000

SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX OF CASES

FROM VOLUMES 15 AND 16 NOT HEREINABOVE NAMED

This Supplemental Appendix lists cases not otherwise indexed from Volume 15, page 350, through Volume 16,

page 290. See text at the head of this Appendix.

SORTED ALPHABETICALLY BY TOPIC AND CASE NAME

Agent

Lockhart v. Rollins Idaho 1889 16 : 16

Assay

Phipps v. Hully Nevada 1883 15 : 350

Bills & Notes

Miller v. Mickel Colo. 1886 15 : 355

Contract

Oliphant v. Woodburn Coal Co. Iowa 1884 15 : 365

Ray v. Hodge Oregon 1887 15 : 371

Skidmore v. Eikenberry Iowa 1880 15 : 360

Wando Phosphate Co. v. Gibbon So. Car. 1888 16 : 55

Conveyance

Ketchum v. Barber Cal. 1886 15 : 378

Corporation(s)

Durham v. Carbon C. & Min. Co. Kan. 1879 15 : 380

McKinley v. Wheeler U.S. Colo. 1888 16 : 65

Sellers v. Phoenix Iron Co. C.C.E.D. Penna. 1881 15 : 388

Exhausted Mine

Green v. Atkinson Mich. 1887 15 : 428

Krum & Peters v. Mersher Penna. 1887 15 : 415

Muhlenberg v. Henning Penna. 1887 15 : 423

Fixtures

Roseville Alta Co. v. Iowa Gulch Co. Colo. 1890 16 : 93

Fraud

Chatham Furnace Co. v. Moffatt Mass. 1888 16 : 103

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-191- June 2000

Southern Devel. Co. v. Silva U.S. Cal. 1888 15 : 435

Lease

Cowan v. Radford Iron Co. Virginia 1887 15 : 453

Garman v. Potts Penna. 1890 16 : 108

License

Hodgson v. Perkins Virginia 1888 16 : 116

Master & Servant

Trihay v. Brooklyn Lead M. Co. Utah 1886 15 : 535

Measure of Damages

Coal Creek M. Co. v. Moses Tenn. 1885 15 : 544

Foster v. Weaver Penna. 1888 15 : 551

Smith v. Bolles C.C.N.D. Ohio 1889 16 : 159

Natural Gas

Johnston’s Appeal Penna. 1886 15 : 556

Washington N.G. Co. v. Johnson Penna. 1889 16 : 165

Negligence

Canter v. Colorado United Co. C.C.D. Colo. 1888 15 : 559

Silver Cord Co. v. McDonald Colo. 1890 16 : 171

Oil

Rice v. Ege C.C.N.D. N.Y. 1890 16 : 179

Partnership

Manville v. Parks Colo. 1883 15 : 565

Slater v. Haas Colo. 1891 (1890) 16 : 201

Snyder v. Burnham Mo. 1882 15 : 562

Prospecting Contract

Chadbourne v. Davis Colo. 1886 15 : 620

Jennings v. Rickard Colo. 1887 15 : 624

Moritz v. Lavelle Cal. 1888 16 : 236

Page v. Summers Cal. 1886 15 : 617

Rents and Royalties

McCahan v. Wharton Penna. 1888 16 : 239

Severance

Williams v. Gibson Alabama 1887 16 : 243

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-192- June 2000

Specific Performance

Lewis v. James U.K. Ct. Ap. 1886 15 : 649

Tenant(s) in Common

Sawyer v. Turner C.C.D. Colo. 1888 16 : 260

Trust(s)

Pierce v. Pierce Mich. 1885 15 : 675

Vendor and Purchaser

Hill v. Sumner U.S. Colo. 1889 16 : 281

Waterman v. Waterman (Porter) C.C.D. Cal. 1886 15 : 687

Weights and Measures

Bourne v. Netherseal C. Co. U.K. Q.B. 1887 15 : 691

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-193- June 2000

SORTED ALPHABETICALLY BY NAME

Bourne v. Netherseal C. Co. U.K. Q.B. 1887 15 : 691

Canter v. Colorado United Co. C.C.D. Colo. 1888 15 : 559

Chadbourne v. Davis Colo. 1886 15 : 620

Chatham Furnace Co. v. Moffatt Mass. 1888 16 : 103

Coal Creek M. Co. v. Moses Tenn. 1885 15 : 544

Cowan v. Radford Iron Co. Virginia 1887 15 : 453

Durham v. Carbon C. & Min. Co. Kan. 1879 15 : 380

Foster v. Weaver Penna. 1888 15 : 551

Garman v. Potts Penna. 1890 16 : 108

Green v. Atkinson Mich. 1887 15 : 428

Hill v. Sumner U.S. Colo. 1889 16 : 281

Hodgson v. Perkins Virginia 1888 16 : 116

Jennings v. Rickard Colo. 1887 15 : 624

Johnston’s Appeal Penna. 1886 15 : 556

Ketchum v. Barber Cal. 1886 15 : 378

Krum & Peters v. Mersher Penna. 1887 15 : 415

Lewis v. James U.K. Ct. Ap. 1886 15 : 649

Lockhart v. Rollins Idaho 1889 16 : 16

Manville v. Parks Colo. 1883 15 : 565

McCahan v. Wharton Penna. 1888 16 : 239

McKinley v. Wheeler U.S. Colo. 1888 16 : 65

Miller v. Mickel Colo. 1886 15 : 355

Moritz v. Lavelle Cal. 1888 16 : 236

Muhlenberg v. Henning Penna. 1887 15 : 423

Oliphant v. Woodburn Coal Co. Iowa 1884 15 : 365

Page v. Summers Cal. 1886 15 : 617

Phipps v. Hully Nevada 1883 15 : 350

Pierce v. Pierce Mich. 1885 15 : 675

Ray v. Hodge Oregon 1887 15 : 371

Rice v. Ege C.C.N.D. N.Y. 1890 16 : 179

Roseville Alta Co. v. Iowa Gulch Co. Colo. 1890 16 : 93

Sawyer v. Turner C.C.D. Colo. 1888 16 : 260

Sellers v. Phoenix Iron Co. C.C.E.D. Penna. 1881 15 : 388

Silver Cord Co. v. McDonald Colo. 1890 16 : 171

Skidmore v. Eikenberry Iowa 1880 15 : 360

Slater v. Haas Colo. 1891(1890) 16 : 201

Smith v. Bolles C.C.N.D. Ohio 1889 16 : 159

Snyder v. Burnham Mo. 1882 15 : 562

Southern Devel. Co. v. Silva U.S. Cal. 1888 15 : 435

Trihay v. Brooklyn Lead M. Co. Utah 1886 15 : 535

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-194- June 2000

Wando Phosphate Co. v. Gibbon So. Car. 1888 16 : 55

Washington N.G. Co. v. Johnson Penna. 1889 16 : 165

Waterman v. Waterman(Porter) C.C.D. Cal. 1886 15 : 687

Williams v. Gibson Alabama 1887 16 : 243

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-195- June 2000

SORTED BY JURISDICTION

Federal Court Cases

Southern Devel. Co. v. Silva U.S. Cal. 1888 15 : 435

McKinley v. Wheeler U.S. Colo. 1888 16 : 65

Hill v. Sumner U.S. Colo. 1889 16 : 281

Waterman v. Waterman(Porter) C.C.D. Cal. 1886 15 : 687

Sawyer v. Turner C.C.D. Colo. 1888 16 : 260

Canter v. Colorado United Co. C.C.D. Colo. 1888 15 : 559

Sellers v. Phoenix Iron Co. C.C.E.D. Penna. 1881 15 : 388

Rice v. Ege C.C.N.D. N.Y. 1890 16 : 179

Smith v. Bolles C.C.N.D. Ohio 1889 16 : 159

State and Territorial Court Cases

Williams v. Gibson Alabama 1887 16 : 243

Page v. Summers Cal. 1886 15 : 617

Ketchum v. Barber Cal. 1886 15 : 378

Moritz v. Lavelle Cal. 1888 16 : 236

Manville v. Parks Colo. 1883 15 : 565

Miller v. Mickel Colo. 1886 15 : 355

Chadbourne v. Davis Colo. 1886 15 : 620

Jennings v. Rickard Colo. 1887 15 : 624

Roseville Alta Co. v. Iowa Gulch Co. Colo. 1890 16 : 93

Silver Cord Co. v. McDonald Colo. 1890 16 : 171

Slater v. Haas Colo. 1891(1890) 16 : 201

Lockhart v. Rollins Idaho 1889 16 : 16

Skidmore v. Eikenberry Iowa 1880 15 : 360

Oliphant v. Woodburn Coal Co. Iowa 1884 15 : 365

Durham v. Carbon C. & Min. Co. Kan. 1879 15 : 380

SHERWOOD’S INDEX TO AND OUTLINE OF MORRISON’S MINING REPORTS BY DON H. SHERWOOD OF THE DENVER BAR

-196- June 2000

Chatham Furnace Co. v. Moffatt Mass. 1888 16 : 103

Pierce v. Pierce Mich. 1885 15 : 675

Green v. Atkinson Mich. 1887 15 : 428

Snyder v. Burnham Mo. 1882 15 : 562

Phipps v. Hully Nevada 1883 15 : 350

Ray v. Hodge Oregon 1887 15 : 371

Johnston’s Appeal Penna. 1886 15 : 556

Krum & Peters v. Mersher Penna. 1887 15 : 415

Muhlenberg v. Henning Penna. 1887 15 : 423

Foster v. Weaver Penna. 1888 15 : 551

McCahan v. Wharton Penna. 1888 16 : 239

Washington N.G. Co. v. Johnson Penna. 1889 16 : 165

Garman v. Potts Penna. 1890 16 : 108

Wando Phosphate Co. v. Gibbon So. Car. 1888 16 : 55

Coal Creek M. Co. v. Moses Tenn. 1885 15 : 544

Trihay v. Brooklyn Lead M. Co. Utah 1886 15 : 535

Cowan v. Radford Iron Co. Virginia 1887 15 : 453

Hodgson v. Perkins Virginia 1888 16 : 116

British and Canadian Cases

Lewis v. James U.K. Ct. Ap. 1886 15 : 649

Bourne v. Netherseal C. Co. U.K. Q.B. 1887 15 : 691