morbidity rounds

17
Phil Ukrainetz Thursday, May 7, 2009

Upload: keita

Post on 10-Feb-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Phil Ukrainetz Thursday, May 7, 2009. Morbidity Rounds. Objective. Are we adequately identifying septic patients in the ED? Are we optimally managing septic patients in the ED? How can we better manage the septic patient in the ED? What are our next steps if any?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Morbidity Rounds

Phil UkrainetzThursday, May 7, 2009

Page 2: Morbidity Rounds

Objective

Are we adequately identifying septic patients in the ED?

Are we optimally managing septic patients in the ED?

How can we better manage the septic patient in the ED?

What are our next steps if any?

Page 3: Morbidity Rounds

“Straight forward patient” Hx: 76 F, sent from Cardiac Function Clinic, precarious CHF, new bilateral leg cellulitis with heel ulcers

PMHx: Aortic Valve Replacement, CHF, bilateral leg DVT’s, DDR pacemaker, RA, hypothyroid, Afib

Meds: ASA, Amiodarone, Candesartan, Lasix, Imdur, Nitro patch, Losec, Coumadin, K-Dur, Metoprolol, Prednisone, Adalimumab

Jehovah Witness – No blood products

Page 4: Morbidity Rounds

And by the way…

BP 80/50 (normal as per pt SBP 90), P 78, T 37.1, Sat 94% on 3L NP

Already juicy and Cr rising as per function clinic – so please avoid saline infusions

Over next 2 hrs – SBP’s as low as 58/38

Positive urine

Page 5: Morbidity Rounds

Patient c/o:

Little “dizzy” Swollen warm legs No chest pain, no SOB on 3L NP – 92%

NAD

Page 6: Morbidity Rounds

EP Mngmt:

Foley Antibiotics 250 NS boluses Dopamine after 750 NS Central line and then norepi MTU/ICU/CCU consults

Page 7: Morbidity Rounds

Patient outcome – did fine admit to CCU Mentated throughout 20 hr stay – vague, nonclinically helpful complaints

Vitals of approx SBP 80/50 and Sats of 92% maintained throughout

ICU 5 hrs to assess – gave fluid/norepi/?ccu

CCU 5 hrs to assess- chf/minor infection - admit

Page 8: Morbidity Rounds

Non-Fatal Harm Morbidity Case Patient was felt by CCU to be more CHF then sepsis

Worried about excessive fluids given

Couldn’t get off pressor – never changed urine output or oxygenation with mngmt

Admitted

Page 9: Morbidity Rounds

Long and short of it

Pt given 3L fluids/20 hrs but never had incr O2 needs

Patient did well Most of us would manage similarly

Lets learn from this difficult case

Page 10: Morbidity Rounds

Sepsis Priorities

Identify sepsis early Early antibiotics Early “liberal” fluids Monitor frequently, accurately and “fly ahead of the plane”

Page 11: Morbidity Rounds

Sepsis Management

EGDT – Emmanuel Rivers 2001 U/S?? Arterial Line Tracing Interpretation??

Early Sepsis Hotline??

Page 12: Morbidity Rounds

EGDT – Hard to Deny

“Golden hours” means ED must be involved

Who is best suited to do CVP placement monitoring? Detroit Model??

Will it aid and abet longer ED stays?

What if it were your mom?

Page 13: Morbidity Rounds

Ultrasound CVP Equivalent? Looks promising – train our own Non-invasive – don’t add to nurse burden

Longer ED stays? Do we see enough to be true experts?

Page 14: Morbidity Rounds

Arterial Line Tracing Interpretation

RTs are now putting in arterial lines

Promising but promotes long ED stays??

Will we truly have the expertise?

Page 15: Morbidity Rounds

Sepsis Hotline

We identify the patient Stroke team like “swoop down” – glorious!

If central line/CVP needed patient is fast-tracked

No beds then CVP placed/ICU manages in ED or in ICU depending on bedspace

Page 16: Morbidity Rounds

Objective

Are we adequately identifying septic patients in the ED? - yes

Are we optimally managing septic patients in the ED? – no – CVP’s should be utilized

How can we better manage the septic patient in the ED? – open dialogue with ICU

What are our next steps if any? -who else is doing ED CVPs in Alberta or Canada? what does ICU think of EGDT team? identify a champion/Jason for the cause

Page 17: Morbidity Rounds

Thanks

Shawn Dowling Jason Lord Rob Hall Gavin Greenfield Tom Rich My mom