monitoring of humidity, cage and bedding … · monitoring of humidity, cage and bedding...
TRANSCRIPT
Monitoring of Humidity, Cage and
Bedding Temperatures in Static
Mouse Caging Following Steam
Sterilization
Gina M Ward, MS, LAT
Husbandry and Facility Coordinator
April 1, 2009
Background
At our institution, many rodent facilities are barrier
maintained where supplies, including caging, are
sterilized before use in rooms.
Due to equipment failure, holidays, and staffing issues,
there may be time constraints as to how quickly clean
supplies can be provided.
BackgroundMajor time constraint may be prolonged cooling time
of cages before use in animal rooms
Sterilized cage set-ups were cool to the touch after
approximately 45 minutes following removal from the
autoclave
Scenario Over the course of 4 months, received reports of unexplained
rodent deaths in 2 cages in isolated facilities
No recent experimental or husbandry manipulations were
described
Only commonality between two isolated events – animals
recently changed into newly sterilized cages
Question / Concern
Although cages felt cool to the touch and can be
handled in less than an hour after autoclaving
…what was the environment like INSIDE the
cages?
…and could this have impacted the mice?
Mice and temperature regulation
Neonates are ectothermic and do not have well-developed temperature control before 20 days of age
Despite various adaptations such as highly vascularized ears and unhaired tails, which increase the surface area for heat loss, thermolysisis very difficult for mice
Mice do not pant, but do possess footpad sweat glands
Mice have low tolerance for extremes in heat.
Normative values range from 70-76°F
Animals exposed to > 85°F without prior acclimation may exhibit clinical effects
According to the Guide:
Mice can tolerate environmental temperatures of 64-79°F
Acceptable room humidity range is 30-70%
Mice and hyperthermia
Working hypothesis
We believed that cage set-ups autoclaved
routinely in our facility were retaining heat
for prolonged periods of time
Internal cage temp
Bedding temp
Cage humidity
Relevant Literature Cage environment post-sterilization NOT previously reported.
Related research:
Differences in temperature among bedding type differed among breeds and housing density
Mice exposed to temperatures ≥ 98.6°F for a period of 60 minutes were shown to exhibit escape behavior
Increase in body weight loss and rectal temperature seen when environmental temperature ≥ 98.6°F for 60 minutes
Cages with filter tops have been shown to impede airflow
The cage microenvironment has been shown to be unaffected by room environmental changes
Facility Background All rodent caging, bedding, food, etc. must be autoclaved
prior to use within barrier facilities
Autoclave conditions:
Sterilizing Temp – 121° Celsius
Sterilizing Time – 16 minutes
Drying Time – 5 minutes
Cage Description Full Cage Set-Up includes:
Polycarbonate cage bottom, wire lid and low profile micro isolator lid.
Cages filled with ¼ inch corncob bedding.
Wire lid filled to capacity with autoclavable rodent chow.
Cages then stacked in two rows,
front and back, ten high and
seven across and placed on
three-sided bulk truck and
covered
Experimental Design Immediately following sterilization,
hygrothermometers placed in cages
Timex TX5170 Indoor/Outdoor Thermometer with Indoor Hygrometer: measures temperature inside cage, humidity inside cage, and temperature of bedding using sensor
Experimental Design Temperature and humidity readings were recorded at 10-
minute intervals following the first reading
Average time from removal of truck from autoclave to first temperature reading = 23 minutes
This includes 10 minutes of acclimation time for hygrometer once placed.
Monitoring sessions lasted for 150 minutes
Performed three trials for the front of the truck, and three trials for the back
Experimental Design For each trial, 6 cages selected from center column and either
side column
Recorded room temp and humidity, as well as cage temp, humidity, and bedding temp in a cool mouse cage prior to experiment
Side Center
1 Top Top
2
3
4
5 Middle Middle
6
7
8
9
10 Bottom Bottom
Experimental Design Measurements taken in 6 cages
occupied with 5 adult mice, in am
and pm, every 10 minutes for one
hour, on two different days
Measurements taken in empty
cage at the beginning of each
sterilizing trial. Cage cooled for
at least 24 hours
ResultsOccupied Cage
(5 mice)
Unoccupied
Cage
Cage Temperature (oF) 72.3 ± 2.57 72.5 ± 1.2
Cage Humidity (%) 81.8 ± 4.52 49.2 ± 4.5
Bedding Temperature (oF) 70.7 ± 0.38 71.0 ± 1.2
Results No significant difference between front and back rows,
thus data combined for a total of 6 data points for each
spot: top side, middle side, bottom side, top center,
middle center, bottom center
Range
At time 0 At 150 minutes
Cage Temperature 84.8-107.6 oF 71.8-80.6oF
Bedding
Temperature
96.7-124.9oF 71.6-86.2oF
Cage Humidity* 63-91% 52-91%
* Hygrometer could not measure humidity over 91%
Results Took on average 13 minutes to move trucks out of
autoclave into cooling room, unpack truck, place
hygrometers, and repack truck
Allowed 10 minute acclimation for hygrometer before
time 0 recorded
Temperature Inside of Cage
Difference across spots at 60 minutes (p=0.014).
At 60 minutes, top side cooler (p=0.037) and middle center hotter
(p=0.0017) than average.
Bottom side cooled more quickly (p=0.0044).
70
80
90
100
110
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Deg
rees
Fa
hre
nh
eit
Top Side
Middle Side
Bottom Side
Top Center
Middle Center
Bottom Center
Temperature of Bedding
70
80
90
100
110
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Deg
rees
Fa
hre
nh
eit
Top Side
Middle Side
Bottom Side
Top Center
Middle Center
Bottom Center
Difference across spots at 50 minutes (p=0.017).
At 50 minutes, top side cooler (p=0.025) and middle center hotter
(p=0.0032), than average.
Bottom side cooled more quickly (p=0.0002).
Humidity Inside of Cage
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
% H
um
idit
y
Top Side
Middle Side
Bottom Side
Top Center
Middle Center
Bottom Center
Difference across spots at 20 minutes (p=0.0041).
At 20 minutes, top side lower (p=0.032) and middle center higher
(p=0.0032) humidity than average.
Both cages on top decreased humidity more quickly (p > 0.001).
Conclusions
Cages across the top had fastest internal humidity drop
Middle center cage had consistently higher cage and bedding temperatures
Internal cage and bedding temperature cooled more quickly for the bottom side cage
Despite being cool to the touch after 45 minutes, the inside environment of rodent cages and bedding remains extremely hot, average 86oF and 92oF respectively
Conclusions Mice can be maintained at environmental conditions of up
to 79oF. On average the inside of the cage lowered to this temperature by 100 minutes and the bedding did so by130 minutes
Recall it took on average 23 minutes to start collecting data from the time the cages left the autoclave
Given these findings, trucks must be allowed to cool a minimum of 2.5 to 3 hours, with autoclavable cover removed, before use
Optimal conditions would allow for overnight cooling
Acknowledgements: Dr. F. Claire Hankenson, Senior Associate Director, ULAR,
University of Pennsylvania
Dr. Kurt Hankenson and Jason Combs, University of Pennsylvania Veterinary School of Medicine
Kelly Cole, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine
Jamal Edwards and Troy Hillanbrand, ULAR, University of Pennsylvania
Financial support for this project was graciously provided by University Laboratory Animal Resources. Ms. Cole was partially supported by funds from the American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine.
References: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. 2006. Laboratory
Mouse Handbook. AALAS, Memphis.
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, N. R. C. 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Smith, E., J. D. Stockwell, I. Schweitzer, S. H. Langley, and A. L. Smith. 2004. Evaluation of cage micro-environment of mice housed on various types of bedding materials. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 43:12-7.
Harikai, N., T. Sugawara, K. Tomogane, K. Mizuno, and S. Tashiro. 2004. Acute heat stress induces jumping escape behavior in mice. Physiol Behav83:373-6.
Harikai, N., K. Tomogane, M. Miyamoto, K. Shimada, S. Onodera, and S. Tashiro. 2003. Dynamic responses to acute heat stress between 34 degrees C and 38.5 degrees C, and characteristics of heat stress response in mice. BiolPharm Bull 26:701-8.
Reeb, C.K. Jones, R.B., Bearg, D.W., Bedigan, H., Paigen, B.1997. Impact of Room Ventilation rates on mouse cage ventilation and microenvironment. Cont. Top. Lab Anim Sci 36 (1): 74-79.