modern chemistry ii department of chemistry, carnegie mellon university

20
Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University Introduction to Kinetics: The Phasing Out of CFC’s

Upload: aqua

Post on 20-Jan-2016

46 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Introduction to Kinetics: The Phasing Out of CFC’s. Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University. 1930: Chapman’s theory of stratospheric ozone. Formation of ozone O 2 + hv  O + O O + O 2  O 3. Ozone protects earth from UV rays - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II

Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Introduction to Kinetics:The Phasing Out of CFC’s

Page 2: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1930: Chapman’s theory of stratospheric ozone

Formation of ozoneO2 + hv O + OO + O2 O3

Ozone protects earth from UV raysO3 + hv O2 + O

O + O2 O3

Destruction of ozoneO + O3 O2 + O2

Page 3: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1940’s and 1950’s

• 1945: Most home refrigerators use CFC-12 as a safe refrigerant (CFC-12 = dichlorodifluoromethane, CF2Cl2)

• 1950: CFCs are used increasingly in manufacture of styrofoam.

Page 4: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1972

• F. Sherwood Rowland attends talk in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida on discovery of new molecule in the atmosphere: CFC-12, CF2Cl2

• Most scientists conclude this is nothing to worry about

Page 5: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1972

Molina Rowland

• Mario J. Molina leaves Mexico to attend graduate school at Berkeley, to study with Rowland

• Rowland and Molina begin thinking about implications of finding CFC’s in upper atmosphere

Page 6: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1973

• Rowland and Molina: What will happen to CFC’s in the stratosphere?– CCl3F +UV light → Cl +CCl2F (lasts 50 yrs)

– CCl2F2 + UV light → Cl + CClF2 (lasts 100 years)• Proposed mechanism for chlorine atoms destroying ozone

Cl + O3 → ClO + O2

ClO + O → Cl + O2

O3 + O → O2 + O2 (overall reaction)

Page 7: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1974

• Molina and Roland publish paper in Nature entitled “The stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalyzed destruction of ozone.”

• Receives little attention at first• Rowland: “At the time, the figure we had was 6 billion spray

cans produced every year in the world, and in our home we had 15 of them. So my wife went around and threw them all out, and I thought ’15 down, 6 billion to go.’”

Page 8: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1975

• Molina: “We were talking about this invisible gas rising in the atmosphere to affect an invisible layer that was protecting us from invisible rays.”

• Molina: “The idea that a lot of people pressing these little buttons inadvertently were actually polluting the planet --- this eventually caught the attention of the press.”

• Value of CFCs produced: 2 billion dollars. • Value of industrial processes that used

them: 200 billion dollars.

Page 9: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

Molina: looking back at 1975

• “Isn’t it a responsibility of scientists, if you believe that you have found something that can affect the environment, isn’t it your responsibility to actually do something about it, enough so that action actually takes place? There was nobody else at that time that would actually fulfill that role. So that’s why Sherry and I, pretty consciously then, decided to take that additional step to make sure the government would actually pay attention.”

Page 10: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1976-1977

• The use of CFCs in spray cans is banned first in the U.S., then in Canada, Norway, and Sweden.

• No other countries follow suit.• CFCs continue to be used as refrigerants and solvents.

Page 11: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

Early 1980’s

• Gradual improvement in techniques used to measure concentrations of chemical species in the stratosphere

Page 12: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1985

• In early 80’s, the British Antarctic Survey notices a drop in ozone when the sun rises in the spring (September).

• At first, they thought this was a problem with their instruments.

• Publish their results in 1985.

Page 13: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1985

• NASA TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer) realizes that the anomalously low values of ozone their software had been throwing away were real.

Page 14: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1986

• Senator John Chafee of Rhode Island: “There is a very real possibility that man, through ignorance or indifference or both, has irreversibly altered the ability of our atmosphere to support life.”

• Representatives of fluorocarbon manufacturers emphasize that ozone depletion may be a completely natural phenomenon.

• Secretary of Interior Hodel: “perhaps it is possible to protect ourselves with sunglasses” (press responds by running cartoons of elephants, lions and zebras wearing sunglasses).

Page 15: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1987

• Plan flights over the Antarctic just before October sun rise• U2 spy plane to fly 3000 miles over the Antarctic and back

again. One engine, with no backup plan for engine failure.• Data collection is automatic, with no monitoring.

• Goal: simultaneous measurement of O3 and ClO: The “smoking gun” experiment

Page 16: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1987

• Ozone detector worked fine• ClO detector failed on first two flights (mid August)

– sketches in January – unassembled hardware in May – a marginally operational flight system in July– software development—by an undergraduate--under the wing of

the airplane in driving rain at stops in Panama and Chile• Third flight (August 23): ClO high, Ozone normal• Fourth flight (September 16): ClO high, 2/3 of ozone gone

Page 17: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1988

•March 15: Press conference of Ozone Trends Panel concludes that ozone hole is caused by CFC’s

“We’ve found more than the smoking gun. We’ve found the corpse.”

• March 25: DuPont Company, largest manufacturer of CFCs, announced that they would no longer manufacture these compounds.

Page 18: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

1992

• In Copenhagen, international agreement for a complete ban of production of CFCs by all industrialized countries by the end of 1995.

• Because of long recovery times, ozone hole over Antarctica will not disappear until around 2050.

Page 19: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

Kinetics

• How do we think about the rate of reactions, such as those that destroy ozone?

• What is a mechanism?• How do we support (prove) a mechanism?

Page 20: Modern Chemistry II Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University

Modern Chemistry II The phasing out of CFC’s

Sources

• Molina and Roland’s speech in honor of Senator Chafee http://www.ncseonline.org/NCSEconference/2000conference/Chafee

• Ozone Milestones http://remus.jpl.nasa.gov/milestones.htm • Center for Atmospheric Science, University of Cambridge

http://www.atm.ch.cam.ac.uk/tour/index.html